Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Reliability of Compliance with the General Treatment Recommendations by Patients Treated for Temporomandibular Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence and Trends in Active Smoking Among Adults Living with HCV in the U.S. over the Last Decade: A Population-Level Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Updates in Diagnostic Tools for ILD
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Interstitial Lung Disease in 2025—Progress, Challenges, and Hope Ahead

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Integrated Hospital Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(18), 6673; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186673
Submission received: 2 September 2025 / Accepted: 17 September 2025 / Published: 22 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates on Interstitial Lung Disease)
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains one of the most challenging conditions in respiratory medicine, with outcomes often as poor as those seen in advanced malignancies. Despite a decade of progress in diagnostics and management, ILD continues to be a relentlessly progressive disorder for many patients. Mortality remains high, and the burden on patients, caregivers, and health systems is immense; as such, ILD remains a focus of intensive research and clinical innovation.
The defining feature of ILD is its heterogeneity. The term “ILD” encompasses a spectrum of fibrosing and inflammatory lung disorders, ranging from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) to connective tissue disease-associated ILD, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and rarer entities such as pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. Each subtype presents unique clinical, radiological, and histopathological characteristics, underscoring the need for personalized approaches to diagnosis and care. A “one-size-fits-all” strategy is not adequate; individualized management anchored in disease phenotyping and patients’ personal values should be the standard of care.
Our understanding of ILD has evolved, leading to refinements in nomenclature and diagnostic criteria. The updated 2025 guidelines provide new terminology and frameworks that reflect current knowledge of disease biology and progression [1]. Clinicians now have access to emerging blood-based biomarkers, genomic assays, and advanced imaging tools that may improve early detection and prognostication. While many remain investigational, such tools bring us closer to the use of precision medicine in ILD. These advances also facilitate better stratification in clinical trials, ensuring that novel therapies are tested in the patients most likely to benefit from them. Despite these advances, the role of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) remains central in reaching accurate diagnoses, ensuring nuanced decision-making in a field where subtle distinctions can profoundly influence management [2].
Therapeutically, the last transformative breakthrough in ILD came in 2014 with the introduction of antifibrotic agents, which slowed IPF disease progression for the first time and later demonstrated benefits across a broader spectrum of progressive fibrosing ILD [3,4]. Yet antifibrotics remain imperfect solutions: they mitigate but do not halt fibrosis, and they do not reverse established disease. Encouragingly, the therapeutic pipeline has accelerated. Multiple phase 2 and 3 trials are investigating agents that target novel pathways, including anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, and regenerative strategies. Early data are promising, fueling cautious optimism that the next decade will deliver therapies capable of altering the natural history of these devastating disorders [5]. Nerandomilast, a PDE4B inhibitor, recently reached its primary endpoint in a phase three trial, marking the first positive trial of a novel agent since antifibrotics [6].
This thematic issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine brings together a collection of original research studies and state-of-the-art reviews that reflect both pragmatic aspects of day-to-day ILD care and the frontiers of discovery. Topics range from optimal strategies for symptom management and supportive care to advances in molecular diagnostics and emerging therapeutic modalities. Together, these contributions underscore both the progress achieved and the urgent unmet needs that remain.
As we look ahead, the ILD field stands at a critical juncture. With refined diagnostic tools, deeper biological insights, and a rich therapeutic pipeline, there is reason to hope that patient outcomes will improve in the years to come.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ryerson, C.J.; Adegunsoye, A.; Piciucchi, S.; Hariri, L.P.; Khor, Y.H.; Wijsenbeek, M.S.; Wells, A.U.; Sharma, A.; Cooper, W.A.; Antoniou, K.; et al. Update of the International Multidisciplinary Classification of the Interstitial Pneumonias: An ERS/ATS Statement. Eur. Respir. J. 2025, 2500158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tharwani, A.; Ribeiro Neto, M.L. Updates in Diagnostic Tools for ILD. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. Richeldi, L.; du Bois, R.M.; Raghu, G.; Azuma, A.; Brown, K.K.; Costabel, U.; Cottin, V.; Flaherty, K.R.; Hansell, D.M.; Inoue, Y.; et al. INPULSIS Trial Investigators. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 2071–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. King, T.E., Jr.; Bradford, W.Z.; Castro-Bernardini, S.; Fagan, E.A.; Glaspole, I.; Glassberg, M.K.; Gorina, E.; Hopkins, P.M.; Kardatzke, D.; Lancaster, L.; et al. ASCEND Study Group. A phase 3 trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 2083–2092, Erratum in N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moua, T.; Baqir, M.; Ryu, J.H. What Is on the Horizon for Treatments in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis? J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  6. Richeldi, L.; Azuma, A.; Cottin, V.; Kreuter, M.; Maher, T.M.; Martinez, F.J.; Oldham, J.M.; Valenzuela, C.; Clerisme-Beaty, E.; Gordat, M.; et al. FIBRONEER-IPF Trial Investigators. Nerandomilast in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025, 392, 2193–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sehgal, S.; Mehta, A. Interstitial Lung Disease in 2025—Progress, Challenges, and Hope Ahead. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 6673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186673

AMA Style

Sehgal S, Mehta A. Interstitial Lung Disease in 2025—Progress, Challenges, and Hope Ahead. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(18):6673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sehgal, Sameep, and Atul Mehta. 2025. "Interstitial Lung Disease in 2025—Progress, Challenges, and Hope Ahead" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 18: 6673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186673

APA Style

Sehgal, S., & Mehta, A. (2025). Interstitial Lung Disease in 2025—Progress, Challenges, and Hope Ahead. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(18), 6673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop