Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Biparametric MRI for Detecting Prostate Cancer—A Comparative Multireader Multicase Accuracy Study
Previous Article in Journal
Camera Port Swapping in Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Feasible Alternative to the Retroperitoneal Approach for Posterior Renal Tumors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Short-Term Morphological and Quantitative Changes in Non-Exudative Macular Neovascularization Using Spectral-Domain OCT and OCT Angiography: A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Panretinal Congenital Hypertrophy of the RPE in an 8-Year-Old Girl with an X-Linked STAG2 Mutation

1
Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA
2
Jonas Children’s Vision Care, and Bernard & Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
3
College of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
4
Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
5
Edward S. Harkness Clinical Coordinating Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and have co-first authorship.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(17), 6110; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176110
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Revised: 26 August 2025 / Accepted: 27 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Clinical Advances in Macular Degeneration)

Abstract

Introduction: Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) is a benign proliferation of the melanin-producing retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Although often a benign and incidental finding, multifocal CHRPE may mimic lesions associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Case Description: We describe an 8-year-old girl presenting with optic disc pallor and widespread multifocal bear track CHRPE observed bilaterally on dilated fundoscopy. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging showed uniform areas of hypoautofluorescence corresponding to the bear track lesions. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) demonstrated normal lamination without atrophy. The full-field electroretinogram (ffERG) was within normal limits. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed a likely pathogenic heterozygous variant in the STAG2 gene (c.3222dup, p.Ser1075IlefsTer12). Conclusions: We present a rare case of bilateral, panretinal bear track CHRPE in a child with a likely pathogenic variant in STAG2. Using multimodal imaging, we contrast bear track lesions of the retina with FAP-associated CHRPE. We also present possible ophthalmic manifestations in carriers of pathogenic STAG2 variants.

1. Introduction

Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) is a benign proliferation of melanin-producing retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells [1,2]. Overall, the prevalence in the general population is estimated to be 1.2% [3]. Typically, CHRPE presents as a unifocal, flat, and hyperpigmented retinal lesion often discovered incidentally on fundus examination. Multifocal CHRPE is a less common manifestation that is characterized by clustering of smaller CHRPE lesions (100–300 μm) from the disc to the periphery, creating the characteristic appearance of bear tracks [2,4]. Although often benign, multifocal CHRPE should warrant additional investigation due to systemic associations with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and Gardner syndrome, where it manifests in up to 90% of cases [5,6]. Given the potential risk of future malignancy, differentiating between benign bear tracks and atypical, FAP-associated CHRPE is an important diagnostic consideration.
The present case also introduces a possible novel genetic association. The STAG2 gene encodes a subunit of the cohesin complex, which is involved in the cohesion of sister chromatids during cell division, DNA repair, and modulation of gene expression [7,8]. Loss-of-function variants in cohesin genes can result in multisystem developmental disorders known as cohesinopathies, which most likely arise due to the cohesin complex’s role in gene expression during embryogenesis. Specifically, loss-of-function in STAG2 is associated with X-linked Mullegama–Klein–Martinez syndrome (MIM# 301043) and X-linked holoprosencephaly (MIM# 301022), with significant phenotypic variability across males and females [9]. STAG2 is highly expressed in the prosencephalic neural folds of the developing embryo, a tissue that later gives rise to the RPE among other neural tissues. Genes involved in early neural differentiation may influence not only the structure and development of the brain, but also that of the RPE and retina. The ophthalmic manifestations of disease are not well characterized. Here, we report a rare case of panretinal bear track CHRPE in an 8-year-old girl with a likely pathogenic frameshift variant in STAG2, using multimodal imaging to distinguish these lesions from FAP-associated CHRPE.

2. Methods

Patient evaluation included a thorough medical and family history, as well as a comprehensive ophthalmic examination with measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, anterior segment evaluation, and dilated fundus examination following pharmacologic dilation with phenylephrine (2.5%) and tropicamide (1%). Multimodal imaging included color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Digital color fundus photographs were obtained (Zeiss Clarus 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). FAF was acquired using Zeiss Clarus 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). SD-OCT was acquired using a Spectralis HRA + OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Full-field electroretinogram (ffERG) was performed in-house using Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow (DTL) electrodes and Ganzfeld stimulation on a Diagnosys Espion Electrophysiology System (Diagnosys LLC, Littleton, MA, USA) according to international standards [10]. ffERG photopic responses were categorized as within normal limits, attenuated, or extinguished based on a clinician’s interpretation of a detectable waveform on the 30 Hz ERG, with reproducible phases; scotopic responses were based on a detectable waveform on the 0.01 dark-adapted ERG [11,12]. Proband-only whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using peripheral blood through the New York Genome Center. Interpretation of variants followed ACMG guidelines [13]. Variant information was queried using the gnomAD v3.1.2 database to assess allele frequency [14]. In silico prediction of variant pathogenicity was performed using combined annotation-dependent depletion (CADD v1.7) [15]. Informed consent was waived due to the minimal risk conferred to the patient and the retrospective nature of the study design as per the Institutional Review Board at Columbia University (protocol AAAB6560). All procedures were reviewed and in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

3. Background

An 8-year-old girl was referred to Columbia University Irving Medical Center for evaluation of unusually extensive bear track lesions identified on routine eye exam. Her medical history was significant for difficulty swallowing as an infant and speech delay, which improved with speech-language therapy. Family history revealed Sephardic Jewish ancestry and a paternal uncle with known colonic polyps but no bear track lesions. Both parents had undergone unremarkable screening colonoscopies. There was a further history of two miscarriages of unknown sex. One of the patient’s four older sisters had a history of developmental delay, including poor feeding in infancy and speech delay requiring therapy.

4. Clinical Findings

On examination, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/20 in both eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured as 18 mmHg in the right eye and 20 mmHg in the left eye. Dilated fundus examination found temporal optic nerve pallor and diffuse bear tracks extending into the macula with an increase in density and size of the lesions in the periphery (Figure 1A,B).

5. Investigations

Autofluorescence imaging showed uniformly hypoautofluorescent spots corresponding with the bear track lesions (Figure 2A,B). Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) demonstrated otherwise normal retinal architecture (Figure 2C,D). A ffERG was performed on-site and showed normal scotopic and photopic responses (Figure 3). Proband-only whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed a likely pathogenic heterozygous variant in the STAG2 gene (c.3222dup, p.Ser1075IlefsTer12). The patient’s clinical findings are summarized in Table 1.

6. Outcome and Follow-Up

At 2-year follow-up, the patient’s vision, exam findings, and imaging all remained stable. Retinal examination and imaging of the patient’s sisters were unremarkable.

7. Discussion

We present a rare case of bilateral bear track CHRPE, a pattern that can mimic FAP-associated CHRPE, but is typically benign. Additionally, we draw a potentially novel retinal association with female carriers of pathogenic STAG2 mutations. FAP-associated CHRPE presents as multiple, bilateral lesions haphazardly distributed throughout the retina. The lesions are nonuniform in pigmentation and are oval or pisciform, with a fishtail-shaped area of hypopigmentation. In contrast, our patient exhibited uniformly pigmented, well-demarcated lesions, consistent with benign bear tracks, despite their uncommon bilateral distribution [22]. On autofluorescence, both FAP-associated and bear track CHRPE appear hypoautofluorescent. However, FAP-associated lesions may have a hyperautofluorescent halo or tail, whereas bear tracks often appear uniformly hypoautofluorescent [23]. OCT findings of FAP-associated CHRPE often reveal RPE extension into the retina, hyperreflectivity and thickening of the RPE, and atrophy of the overlying photoreceptor layer at the level of the lesion [24]. Choroidal elevation, excavations, and serous detachments at the level of the lesions have also been reported [25]. In contrast, RPE cells in bear tracks are normal-sized, and OCT shows normal lamination with no photoreceptor layer atrophy (Figure 2F) [22,24].
Once FAP-associated CHRPE has been excluded, management of bear tracks is conservative, as the lesions are asymptomatic and carry a very low risk of malignancy. Patients with bear tracks do not have an increased risk of developing colon cancer compared to the general population [26]. The restricted surface area of the lesions in bear track CHRPE also explains the overall normal rod and cone function seen in the patient’s ffERG (Figure 3) [27]. However, the development of scotomas as a result of RPE neovascularization has rarely been reported [22,28]. Follow-up visits to monitor for lesion progression, and infrequent visual field testing for prospective new visual field defects are recommended [29].
Pathogenic variants in STAG2 are associated with X-linked Mullegama–Klein–Martinez syndrome and X-linked holoprosencephaly [7,16]. Mullegama–Klein–Martinez syndrome manifests with developmental delay, microcephaly, and congenital anomalies. A summary of genotype–phenotype correlations is outlined in Table 1. Pathogenic variants in STAG2 are generally lethal or result in severe disease in males, while females can manifest with a wide spectrum of severity, likely due to variable patterns of X-inactivation [7,9]. A previous case series by Kumar et al. found that female carriers ranged from mild intellectual disability, including speech delay, to normal cognitive function [9]. The majority of this cohort demonstrated normal growth and development. Other features reported included short stature, small head circumference, and facial hypotonia. Our patient’s history of difficulty swallowing and speech delay aligns with this spectrum. Further, the absence of male siblings and the presence of two miscarriages may reflect male lethality associated with dysfunction in STAG2. Interestingly, the patient’s sisters did not have any retinal findings on exam, although one required therapy for poor feeding as an infant and speech therapy as a toddler.
While some studies in STAG2-related disease have reported ocular abnormalities such as strabismus, there is a paucity of detailed retinal phenotyping [7,16,17,18,19,20,21]. One prior report described optic nerve hypoplasia, which may account for the temporal nerve pallor observed in this patient [7]. Additionally, Freyberger et al. reported an atrophic retinal scar in a male patient with a pathogenic STAG2 variant [20]. Unfortunately, neither study included retinal imaging for comparison.
The multisystem congenital abnormalities observed in cohesinopathies primarily arise from impaired gene expression during embryogenesis, as mutations causing overt failure of chromosomal segregation or DNA repair are likely to be lethal [8,30]. The most common cohesinopathy, Cornelia de Lange syndrome, is caused by dysfunction in a variety of cohesin subunits, such as NIPBL, SMC1A, SMC3, RAD21, BRD4, HDAC8, and ANKRD11 [31]. Indeed, human cell lines and murine models have shown greatly altered gene expression during development, while chromatid cohesion and DNA repair remained largely intact [32]. As part of Cornelia de Lange syndrome, patients may have ocular manifestations such as ptosis, strabismus, high myopia, and nystagmus [30,31].
Functional studies in other cohesinopathies, including STAG2-related disease, have shown similar support for altered gene expression as the primary cause of syndromic abnormalities rather than poor chromatid cohesion [7,16]. Using Giemsa staining, Mullegama et al. found that while some mutant cells with a loss-of-function STAG2 variant actually displayed tighter chromatid cohesion, premature separation did not occur [16]. Furthermore, Kruszka et al. showed that the cohesin genes STAG2 and SMC1A are highly expressed in the prosencephalic neural folds during primary neurulation in mouse embryos, supporting their role in forebrain development [7]. This tissue gives rise to the retina, RPE, and optic nerve, suggesting a potential developmental link with ocular dysgenesis. Supporting this, Gibellato et al. reported ocular manifestations from dysfunction in SMC1A, with visual impairment observed in 25% of a large international cohort of SMC1A epilepsy syndrome [33].
This patient’s variant is absent from population databases (gnomAD v3.1.2), suggesting it is not a common benign variant in the general population [14]. The c.3222dup variant in STAG2, located in exon 30 of this 35-exon gene, is predicted to result in a frameshift with a premature stop codon (p.Ser1075IlefsTer12) leading to loss-of-function via nonsense-mediated decay. In silico prediction with CADD (v1.7, GRCh38) yielded a score of 34 for the patient’s variant, supporting a high likelihood of pathogenicity [15]. Additionally, although most reported loss-of-function variants in the literature are upstream of c.3222, a nearby downstream loss-of-function variant has been identified in an affected individual [19]. Future in vitro and in vivo studies must be performed to properly characterize this variant’s effects.
This report is limited by the single-subject design and the absence of functional validation of the reported STAG2 variant. While the c.3222dup variant is predicted to result in loss-of-function via nonsense-mediated decay, supporting experimental data is lacking. Future development of mouse models or human cell lines is vital for the validation of this novel variant’s pathogenicity. Giemsa staining of patient-derived cells would also be useful in determining levels of chromatid cohesion. Additional neuroimaging for both the patient and family members would have been useful in supporting our findings. Further genetic testing of family members, including verification of the Y chromosome in miscarried fetuses, could provide stronger support for the X-linked inheritance pattern and associated male lethality.

8. Conclusions

This case of panretinal CHRPE in the context of a likely pathogenic STAG2 mutation highlights a rare retinal presentation that mimics FAP-associated CHRPE and expands upon the phenotypic spectrum of STAG2-associated disease. It also highlights the utility of ophthalmic examination and WGS in diagnosing patients with genetic diseases that may carry potential systemic manifestations. Multimodal imaging was essential in distinguishing benign bear track CHRPE from syndromic forms, supporting conservative management. Future studies should explore the prevalence of retinal pigmentary abnormalities, including CHRPE, in individuals with STAG2 variants to assess for potential phenotypic patterns. Functional assays and animal models could also help clarify whether STAG2 expression directly contributes to retinal development and RPE morphology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.K., M.M.S., J.K.O., V.S.D., M.S., A.D., S.E.B., I.H.M. and S.H.T.; Methodology, M.D.K., M.M.S., J.K.O., V.S.D., M.S., A.D., S.E.B., I.H.M. and S.H.T.; Software, M.D.K. and M.M.S.; Validation, M.D.K., M.M.S. and J.K.O.; Formal Analysis, M.D.K., M.M.S. and J.K.O.; Investigation, M.D.K., M.M.S., J.K.O., V.S.D., M.S., A.D., S.E.B., I.H.M. and S.H.T.; Resources, S.H.T.; Data Curation, M.D.K., M.M.S. and J.K.O.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.D.K. and M.M.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.D.K., M.M.S., J.K.O., V.S.D., M.S., A.D., S.E.B., I.H.M. and S.H.T.; Visualization, M.D.K. and M.M.S.; Supervision, A.D., S.E.B., I.H.M. and S.H.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Jonas Children’s Vision Care is supported by the National Institute of Health (U01EY030580, U01EY034590, R24EY028758, R24EY027285, R01EY033770, R01EY018213, R01EY024698), the Foundation Fighting Blindness TA-GT-0321-0802-COLU-TRAP, the Lynette and Richard Jaffe Foundation, NYEE Foundation, the Rosenbaum Family Foundation, the Gebroe Family Foundation, the Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Physician-Scientist Award, and unrestricted funds from RPB, New York, NY, USA.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures were reviewed and in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, as approved by the Institutional Review Board (protocol AAAB6560, date of approval 20 December 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived due to minimal patient risk and the retrospective study design.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

S.H.T. receives financial support from Abeona Therapeutics, Inc., and Emendo is on the scientific and clinical advisory board for Nanoscope Therapeutics. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Braga, C.S.; Ricardo, O.M.P.; Cordeiro, F.M.; Vieira, J.M.; Nogueira, F.B. Suspect asymptomatic lesions: Congenital hypertrophy of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium (CHRPE). Rom. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 65, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Deibert, B.; Ferris, L.; Sanchez, N.; Weishaar, P. The link between colon cancer and congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE). Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2019, 15, 100524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Coleman, P.; Barnard, N.A. Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium: Prevalence and ocular features in the optometric population. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2007, 27, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Regillo, C.D.; Eagle, R.C., Jr.; Shields, J.A.; Shields, C.L.; Arbizo, V.V. Histopathologic findings in congenital grouped pigmentation of the retina. Ophthalmology 1993, 100, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Traboulsi, E.I.; Murphy, S.F.; de la Cruz, Z.C.; Maumenee, I.H.; Green, W.R. A clinicopathologic study of the eyes in familial adenomatous polyposis with extracolonic manifestations (Gardner’s syndrome). Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1990, 110, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wallis, Y.L.; Macdonald, F.; Hulten, M.; Morton, J.E.; McKeown, C.M.; Neoptolemos, J.P.; Keighley, M.; Morton, D.G. Genotype-phenotype correlation between position of constitutional APC gene mutation and CHRPE expression in familial adenomatous polyposis. Hum. Genet. 1994, 94, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kruszka, P.; Berger, S.I.; Casa, V.; Dekker, M.R.; Gaesser, J.; Weiss, K.; Martinez, A.F.; Murdock, D.R.; Louie, R.J.; Prijoles, E.J.; et al. Cohesin complex-associated holoprosencephaly. Brain 2019, 142, 2631–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brooker, A.S.; Berkowitz, K.M. The roles of cohesins in mitosis, meiosis, and human health and disease. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1170, 229–266. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar, R.; Corbett, M.A.; Van Bon, B.W.; Gardner, A.; Woenig, J.A.; Jolly, L.A.; Douglas, E.; Friend, K.; Tan, C.; Van Esch, H.; et al. Increased STAG2 dosage defines a novel cohesinopathy with intellectual disability and behavioral problems. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 7171–7181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Robson, A.G.; Nilsson, J.; Li, S.; Jalali, S.; Fulton, A.B.; Tormene, A.P.; Holder, G.E.; Brodie, S.E. ISCEV guide to visual electrodiagnostic procedures. Doc. Ophthalmol. 2018, 136, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andreasson, S.O.; Sandberg, M.A.; Berson, E.L. Narrow-band filtering for monitoring low-amplitude cone electroretinograms in retinitis pigmentosa. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1988, 105, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Berson, E.L.; Rosner, B.; Sandberg, M.A.; Hayes, K.C.; Nicholson, B.W.; Weigel-DiFranco, C.; Willett, W. A randomized trial of vitamin A and vitamin E supplementation for retinitis pigmentosa. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1993, 111, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gudmundsson, S.; Singer-Berk, M.; Watts, N.A.; Phu, W.; Goodrich, J.K.; Solomonson, M.; Genome Aggregation Database, C.; Rehm, H.L.; MacArthur, D.G.; O’Donnell-Luria, A. Variant interpretation using population databases: Lessons from gnomAD. Hum. Mutat. 2022, 43, 1012–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schubach, M.; Maass, T.; Nazaretyan, L.; Roner, S.; Kircher, M. CADD v1.7: Using protein language models, regulatory CNNs and other nucleotide-level scores to improve genome-wide variant predictions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, D1143–D1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mullegama, S.V.; Klein, S.D.; Mulatinho, M.V.; Senaratne, T.N.; Singh, K.; Center, U.C.G.; Nguyen, D.C.; Gallant, N.M.; Strom, S.P.; Ghahremani, S.; et al. De novo loss-of-function variants in STAG2 are associated with developmental delay, microcephaly, and congenital anomalies. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2017, 173, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yuan, B.; Neira, J.; Pehlivan, D.; Santiago-Sim, T.; Song, X.; Rosenfeld, J.; Posey, J.E.; Patel, V.; Jin, W.; Adam, M.P.; et al. Clinical exome sequencing reveals locus heterogeneity and phenotypic variability of cohesinopathies. Genet. Med. 2019, 21, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aoi, H.; Lei, M.; Mizuguchi, T.; Nishioka, N.; Goto, T.; Miyama, S.; Suzuki, T.; Iwama, K.; Uchiyama, Y.; Mitsuhashi, S.; et al. Nonsense variants of STAG2 result in distinct congenital anomalies. Hum. Genome Var. 2020, 7, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rinaldi, B.; Race, V.; Corveleyn, A.; Van Hoof, E.; Bauters, M.; Van Den Bogaert, K.; Denayer, E.; de Ravel, T.; Legius, E.; Baldewijns, M.; et al. Next-generation sequencing in prenatal setting: Some examples of unexpected variant association. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2020, 63, 103875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Freyberger, F.; Kokotovic, T.; Krnjak, G.; Frkovic, S.H.; Nagy, V. Expanding the known phenotype of Mullegama-Klein-Martinez syndrome in male patients. Hum. Genome Var. 2021, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schmidt, J.; Dreha-Kulaczewski, S.; Zafeiriou, M.P.; Schreiber, M.K.; Wilken, B.; Funke, R.; Neuhofer, C.M.; Altmuller, J.; Thiele, H.; Nurnberg, P.; et al. Somatic mosaicism in STAG2-associated cohesinopathies: Expansion of the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 1025332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Comaratta, M.; Bakall, B. Extensive Grouped Congenital Hypertrophy of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Ophthalmol. Retina 2018, 2, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, C.J.; Yaghy, A.; Shields, C.L. Pigmented Ocular Fundus Lesions Associated with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2020, 51, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ly, A.; Nivison-Smith, L.; Hennessy, M.; Kalloniatis, M. Pigmented Lesions of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2015, 92, 844–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Traboulsi, E.I. Ocular manifestations of familial adenomatous polyposis (Gardner syndrome). Ophthalmol. Clin. N. Am. 2005, 18, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shields, C.L.; Mashayekhi, A.; Ho, T.; Cater, J.; Shields, J.A. Solitary congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium: Clinical features and frequency of enlargement in 330 patients. Ophthalmology 2003, 110, 1968–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Santos, A.; Morales, L.; Hernandez-Quintela, E.; Jimenez-Sierra, J.M.; Villalobos, J.J.; Panduro, A. Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium associated with familial adenomatous polyposis. Retina 1994, 14, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shields, C.L.; Materin, M.A.; Walker, C.; Marr, B.P.; Shields, J.A. Photoreceptor loss overlying congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006, 113, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marmoy, O.R.; Blackwell, C.; Cornelius, S.; Thompson, D.A.; Henderson, R.H. Diffuse bear-track retina: Profound, bilateral, grouped congenital pigmentation of the retinal pigment epithelium in an infant. J. AAPOS 2020, 24, 384–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Piche, J.; Van Vliet, P.P.; Puceat, M.; Andelfinger, G. The expanding phenotypes of cohesinopathies: One ring to rule them all! Cell Cycle 2019, 18, 2828–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kline, A.D.; Moss, J.F.; Selicorni, A.; Bisgaard, A.M.; Deardorff, M.A.; Gillett, P.M.; Ishman, S.L.; Kerr, L.M.; Levin, A.V.; Mulder, P.A.; et al. Diagnosis and management of Cornelia de Lange syndrome: First international consensus statement. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018, 19, 649–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dorsett, D.; Krantz, I.D. On the molecular etiology of Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1151, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gibellato, E.; Cianci, P.; Mariani, M.; Parma, B.; Huisman, S.; Smigiel, R.; Bisgaard, A.M.; Massa, V.; Gervasini, C.; Moretti, A.; et al. SMC1A epilepsy syndrome: Clinical data from a large international cohort. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2024, 194, e63577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Color fundus photography of an 8-year-old girl with panretinal, bilateral bear tracks, showing temporal pallor and round, flat, hyperpigmented lesions spanning the fundus, including the macula. Lesions start small closer to the disc and then increase in density and size in the periphery. OD = right eye (A); OS = left eye (B).
Figure 1. Color fundus photography of an 8-year-old girl with panretinal, bilateral bear tracks, showing temporal pallor and round, flat, hyperpigmented lesions spanning the fundus, including the macula. Lesions start small closer to the disc and then increase in density and size in the periphery. OD = right eye (A); OS = left eye (B).
Jcm 14 06110 g001
Figure 2. Autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography imaging of an 8-year-old girl with panretinal, bilateral bear tracks. Autofluorescence imaging of the right (A) and left eye (B) revealed small areas of hypoautofluorescence, consistent with the hyperpigmented lesions observed on fundoscopy. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging (C,D) revealed organized lamination with no photoreceptor layer atrophy, retinal pigment epithelium thickening, or hyperreflectivity at the level of the lesions denoted by red arrows (E,F).
Figure 2. Autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography imaging of an 8-year-old girl with panretinal, bilateral bear tracks. Autofluorescence imaging of the right (A) and left eye (B) revealed small areas of hypoautofluorescence, consistent with the hyperpigmented lesions observed on fundoscopy. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging (C,D) revealed organized lamination with no photoreceptor layer atrophy, retinal pigment epithelium thickening, or hyperreflectivity at the level of the lesions denoted by red arrows (E,F).
Jcm 14 06110 g002
Figure 3. Full-field electroretinogram (ffERG) recordings of an 8-year-old girl with panretinal, bilateral bear track retina. ffERG revealed normal rod and cone amplitudes with no implicit time delay.
Figure 3. Full-field electroretinogram (ffERG) recordings of an 8-year-old girl with panretinal, bilateral bear track retina. ffERG revealed normal rod and cone amplitudes with no implicit time delay.
Jcm 14 06110 g003
Table 1. Summary of reported STAG2 variants with associated systemic and ocular findings. Data are compiled from the present study and previously published case reports and series describing genotype–phenotype correlations, with ophthalmologic features included when available. Abbreviations: PFO = patent foramen ovale; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus; VSD = ventricular septal defect; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux; CDH = congenital diaphragmatic hernia; NR = not reported.
Table 1. Summary of reported STAG2 variants with associated systemic and ocular findings. Data are compiled from the present study and previously published case reports and series describing genotype–phenotype correlations, with ophthalmologic features included when available. Abbreviations: PFO = patent foramen ovale; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus; VSD = ventricular septal defect; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux; CDH = congenital diaphragmatic hernia; NR = not reported.
Reported VariantSexSummary of Systemic FindingsOcular Findings
Present Studyc.3222dup, p.Ser1075IlefsTer12FFeeding problems, speech delayOptic nerve pallor, congenital hypertrophy of the RPE
Mullegama et al., 2017 [16]c.205C > T, p.Arg69TerFDysgenesis of splenium and corpus callosum, speech delay, cleft palate, bilateral microtia, hearing loss, hemivertebrae, butterfly vertebrae, fifth finger clinodactyly, VSDStrabismus
Kruszka et al., 2019 [7]c.3034C > T, p.Arg1012TerFAlobar brain, microcephaly, midline cleft palate, low-set ears, lumbar spina bifida, GERDNR
c.205C > T, p.Arg69TerFSemi-lobar brain, global developmental delay, growth delay, microcephaly, cleft palate, micrognathia, PFO, PDANR
c.436C > T, p.Arg146TerFAlobar brain, growth delay, microcephaly, absent nose, hypognathia, hypoplastic ear, hemivertebrae, VSD, duodenal atresiaCyclopia
c.2533 + 1G > A (intronic)FSemi-lobar brain, microcephaly, hypoplastic left heart, double outlet right ventricleNR
c.2898_2899del, p.Glu968SerfsTer15FMicroform brain, developmental delay, growth delay, microcephalyNR
c.775C > T, p.Arg259TerFSepto-optic dysplasia, intellectual disability, motor delay, left hip dysplasia, VSDBilateral optic nerve hypoplasia
Yuan et al., 2019 [17]c.418C > T, p.Gln140TerFSeizure disorder, motor and speech delay, dysmorphic ears, vertebral clefts, hypoplastic left heartNR
c.1605T > A, p.Cys535TerFIntellectual disability, motor and speech delay, growth delay, microcephaly, micrognathia, microtia, hearing loss, fifth finger clinodactylyStrabismus
c.1811G > A, p.Arg604GlnFIntellectual disability, growth delay, microcephaly, micrognathia, hypotonia, vertebral clefts, CDH, pulmonary hypoplasia, GERDNR
c.1658_1660delinsT, p.Lys533IlefsTer6FMicroform brain with agenesis of the corpus callosum, seizure disorder, intellectual disability, motor and speech delay, growth delay, microcephaly with colpocephaly, single central incisor, micrognathia, dysmorphic ears, vertebral anomalies NR
c.476A > G, p.Tyr159CysMEctopic posterior pituitary, intellectual disability, growth delay, cleft palate, low-set ears, hypotonia, scoliosis, single kidneyNone
Aoi et al., 2020 [18]c.3097C > T, p.Arg1033TerMHoloprosencephaly, cleft palate, hypoplastic left heart NR
c.2229C > T, p.Trp743TerFWhite matter hypoplasia, seizure disorder, intellectual disability, growth delay, cleft palate, hearing loss, thoracic hemivertebraeNR
Rinaldi et al., 2020 [19]c.3724C > T, p.Arg1242TerFHoloprosencephaly, low-set ears, CDH, ambiguous genitaliaUnspecified eye abnormalities
Freyberger et al., 2021 [20]c.475T > C, p.Tyr159HisMPolymicrogyria with hypotrophic corpus callosum, dolichocephaly, high arched palate, hypotoniaAtrophic retinal and uveal scar
Schmidt et al., 2022 [21]c. 2184G > T, p.Gln728HisFHypotrophic right hemisphere with dysplastic corpus callosum and white matter hypoplasia, microcephaly, low-set ears, hearing loss, hemivertebrae, butterfly vertebrae, hemangiomaLimbal dermoid
c.1412_1416 + 9del (intronic)FHoloprosencephaly, speech and motor delay, microcephaly, low-set ears, retrognathia, dystonia, scoliosisStrabismus
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kong, M.D.; Sylla, M.M.; Oh, J.K.; Dedania, V.S.; Soucy, M.; Demirkol, A.; Brodie, S.E.; Maumenee, I.H.; Tsang, S.H. Panretinal Congenital Hypertrophy of the RPE in an 8-Year-Old Girl with an X-Linked STAG2 Mutation. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176110

AMA Style

Kong MD, Sylla MM, Oh JK, Dedania VS, Soucy M, Demirkol A, Brodie SE, Maumenee IH, Tsang SH. Panretinal Congenital Hypertrophy of the RPE in an 8-Year-Old Girl with an X-Linked STAG2 Mutation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(17):6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176110

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kong, Maximilian D., Mohamed M. Sylla, Jin Kyun Oh, Vaidehi S. Dedania, Megan Soucy, Aykut Demirkol, Scott E. Brodie, Irene H. Maumenee, and Stephen H. Tsang. 2025. "Panretinal Congenital Hypertrophy of the RPE in an 8-Year-Old Girl with an X-Linked STAG2 Mutation" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 17: 6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176110

APA Style

Kong, M. D., Sylla, M. M., Oh, J. K., Dedania, V. S., Soucy, M., Demirkol, A., Brodie, S. E., Maumenee, I. H., & Tsang, S. H. (2025). Panretinal Congenital Hypertrophy of the RPE in an 8-Year-Old Girl with an X-Linked STAG2 Mutation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(17), 6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176110

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop