Next Article in Journal
Recovery and Protective Effect of Direct Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Acute and Subacute Fibular Tunnel Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Serum Presepsin Might Not Detect Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip Arthroplasty
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Thyroid Cancer in Childhood Leukemia Survivors: A Systematic Review of the Incidence and Survival Outcomes

by
Vasiliki Rengina Tsinopoulou
,
Eleni P. Kotanidou
,
Savvas Kolanis
,
Athanasios Tragiannidis
,
Emmanouel Hatzipantelis
and
Assimina Galli-Tsinopoulou
*
2nd Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4248; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124248
Submission received: 13 May 2025 / Revised: 8 June 2025 / Accepted: 11 June 2025 / Published: 14 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Pediatrics)

Abstract

Background/Objective: Radiotherapy for leukemia, the most common childhood malignancy, often exposes patients to radiation, increasing the risk of second malignancies, including thyroid cancer. To assess the incidence and survival outcomes of thyroid cancer after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Methods: We systematically reviewed articles reporting the incidence of thyroid cancer in childhood leukemia survivors (age at diagnosis < 18 years) published between 2000–2024 in Science Direct, PubMed, Google Scholar, CENTRAL, and EMBASE. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was utilized to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies. Descriptive statistics and calculations of incidence were performed using Microsoft Excel. Results: The literature search yielded 1265 articles, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. Data from 135,861 childhood cancer survivors, among whom 102,070 had a confirmed diagnosis of childhood leukemia, including ALL. The crude incidence of secondary malignancies after childhood leukemia was 10.1 per 1000 patients. Among these, 1.5 per 1000 patients developed second thyroid carcinomas. Overall, 14.6% of the second malignancies in childhood leukemia survivors were thyroid carcinomas, mostly of the papillary type. Survival rates after second thyroid cancer were 100% in all 11/18 studies reporting this outcome. Radiotherapy had been used as part of ALL treatments in 17/18 studies. The use of radiotherapy, female sex, and younger age at the diagnosis of primary ALL emerged as important risk factors for thyroid cancer. Conclusions: Thyroid carcinomas account for ~15% of secondary malignancies after childhood leukemia, with radiation remaining a significant risk factor despite its overall reduced use for the treatment of ALL in the last few decades. Importantly, survival rates remain high. Further research is warranted to determine the incidence and outcomes of thyroid cancer in childhood ALL survivors

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Leukemia is a common malignancy in pediatric populations, accounting for a significant percentage of cancer-related mortality and morbidity in this population [1]. The two main phenotypes of leukemia, acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), account for about 30% of all pediatric leukemia cases. Among these two phenotypes, ALL is more prevalent than AML in the pediatric population, accounting for 80% of childhood leukemia occurring under 19 years of age, whereas AML only represents 15–20% [1,2]. Other types of leukemia, such as chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), only account for about 3% of all childhood leukemia cases [3]. These leukemia subtypes differ in terms of their etiologies, prognosis, and treatment response, and even in terms of their clinical manifestations. Across all etiologies, both prenatal and postnatal factors play a crucial role in the determination of the onset of childhood leukemia [4].
While leukemia is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children, the survival of these patients has greatly improved over the years. Currently, it is estimated that more than 85% of the patients diagnosed with childhood cancer survive for at least 5 years [5]. However, despite being very much desired, this increased survival is accompanied by an increased risk of developing comorbidities related to childhood cancer diagnosis [5], including the development of second primary malignancies (SPMs) after the successful treatment of the childhood cancer. The 30-year cumulative incidence of SPMs in patients with primary leukemia was reported to be 5.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5–6.7%) [6]. Risk factors for developing secondary neoplasms after childhood cancer include female sex, age at primary childhood cancer diagnosis, the use of radiation therapy, the intensity of chemotherapeutic agents, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation due to high-dose conditioning regimens, and immunotherapeutic regimens [6,7].
Many radiological and epidemiological studies have established that exposure to radiation during childhood is one of the main risk factors for the development of thyroid cancer after childhood cancer [8]. This is expected considering the high sensitivity of the thyroid gland, especially the pediatric one, to radiation. The use of radiotherapy in ALL has decreased dramatically over the past few decades, mainly owing to the development and intensification of chemotherapy protocols [9]. However, regimens for the treatment of pediatric cancer may still involve the use of radiation, making survivors prone to developing second cancers, including thyroid carcinoma [8]. While a rare occurrence in childhood cancer survivors, thyroid carcinoma still accounts for some of the major cancers after childhood cancer.
This systematic review aimed to summarize the current evidence on the incidence and related outcomes of thyroid carcinoma after childhood leukemia, specifically ALL, given its higher prevalence in the pediatric population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Protocol and Registration

This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) [10]. The protocol of the review was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C4J5R).

2.2. Literature Search

The literature search was conducted independently by two reviewers, VRT and AGT, using two approaches. In the first approach, the reviewers used a set of keywords to perform a comprehensive search in five electronic databases, i.e., Science Direct, PubMed, Google Scholar, CENTRAL, and EMBASE, in order to identify articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2024. The keywords utilized for the electronic search included (Second Malignancy OR Second Neoplasms, OR Second Thyroid Cancer) AND (Pediatric Leukemia OR Childhood Leukemia Survivors OR Childhood Cancer Survivors). These keywords were modified for each database to maximize the number of results. In the second approach, the reviewers checked the lists of the references of the obtained studies to find additional studies that would not have been identified in the initial search. Finally, the reviewers searched for any trial registered in the clinical trial.gov registry for any completed trial with results that did not have published outcomes available.

2.3. Eligibility Criteria

After obtaining all the articles from the databases and registries, the authors utilized the prespecified eligibility criteria to analyze each article before including it in the review.
Articles were selected if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) published in English, (2) inclusion of childhood survivors of primary leukemia (diagnosis of leukemia prior to age of 18 years), (3) reporting the incidence of thyroid cancer after primary leukemia, (4) designed as case-control studies, cohort studies, and case series.
Studies were excluded from the review during the eligibility analysis if they met the following exclusion criteria: (1) not including patients with primary leukemia; (2) including patients diagnosed with leukemia after the age of 18 years; (3) not reporting the incidence of thyroid cancer as a second malignancy after primary leukemia; (4) being secondary studies, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and narrative reviews.

2.4. Data Extraction

Two reviewers, VRT and AGT, independently conducted the data extraction for the review. In case of disagreement during the data extraction process, the two reviewers discussed the arising discrepancies until they reached a consensus. As per the PRISMA guidelines, before data extraction, the authors conducted a review of all the references obtained through various phases. The initial phases entailed abstract screening for the relevance of the articles, after which all irrelevant articles were eliminated. The full text of the remaining articles was then searched and also assessed for eligibility. Those that met the inclusion criteria were used for data extraction. The information obtained from each article included the author ID, study setting, subtype of leukemia, sample size (overall, leukemia only), age at the diagnosis of primary leukemia, time to the diagnosis of thyroid cancer or SPM, type of treatment for leukemia, type of treatment for thyroid cancer, analyzed outcomes, survival of patients with second thyroid cancer, and follow-up time. The reviewers also obtained details of second malignancies, including the overall incidence of second malignancies and the incidence of thyroid cancer, as well as the type of thyroid cancer, if specified, in the study. Other relevant factors, such as the dose of radiation in cases where radiotherapy was used for the treatment of leukemia, were also extracted.

2.5. Quality/Risk-of-Bias Assessment

An assessment of the risk of bias was performed by using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). This scale, which is adapted for both cohort and case-control studies, is used to analyze the methodological quality of each study in terms of cohort selection, cohort comparability, and outcome reporting, taking into account the follow-up period. Each reviewer rated the included studies using stars as specified in an accompanying key. The total number of stars for each of the NOS domains was then used to determine the overall Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standard of the study [11].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics, the calculations of the means and standard deviations of raw data provided for the subgroups of patients, and the calculation of the crude incidence of thyroid cancer among childhood leukemia survivors were performed using Microsoft Excel version 16.66.1.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

Our literature search yielded 1265 articles, among which 876 were duplicates and thus were excluded from the study. This led to 389 abstracts being screened. After the abstract screening, 302 articles were considered irrelevant to the topic of study and were thus excluded from the study, and the remaining 87 articles were searched for the retrieval of the full text and an assessment for eligibility for our review. After the eligibility assessment, 18 articles were included in the review, and 69 were excluded. The following were the reasons for excluding these 69 studies: 8 were secondary studies, 51 did not report the incidence of thyroid cancer as a second malignancy of leukemia, and 10 were duplicate reports from the same cohort of patients, including the Childhood Cancer Survivor study and the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database. A PRISMA diagram summarizing the search strategy followed is presented in Figure 1.

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies

The characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1. This review included 18 cohort studies that summarized data from a pooled cohort of 135,861 patients, among whom 102,070 had a confirmed diagnosis of leukemia prior to the age of 18 years. The median follow-up time ranged from 0 to 40 years across studies.
Table 2 shows the disease and treatment characteristics. The common types of leukemia were ALL and AML. The age of the patients with thyroid cancer at the time of the diagnosis of leukemia (or other primary cancer, if not specified) ranged from 0 to 19.7 years. The latency to thyroid cancer development after the diagnosis of primary leukemia ranged from 1 to 35.5 years. The different subtypes of thyroid carcinoma reported included papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Most of the included studies analyzed the incidence of second malignancies, including thyroid carcinoma. A few studies analyzed the outcomes after second malignancies, including survival, and a few studies performed a subgroup analysis of these outcomes based on the type of cancer.

3.3. Methodological Quality of the Included Studies

All the included studies had good methodological quality in both the selection of participants and the reporting of the outcomes. The comparability of the different cohorts was also good within each study, and most of the studies adjusted the reported outcomes for confounding factors such as age, sex, and the occurrence of death (Table 3).

3.4. Incidence of Thyroid Cancer

All the included studies reported the incidence of second malignancies after childhood leukemia, with one of the second malignancies being thyroid carcinoma. In a sample of 102,070 patients with leukemia, including ALL, there were 1108 patients who developed SPMs, of whom 162 developed second thyroid cancer (14.6%). The crude incidence of second malignancies in leukemia survivors was 10.1 malignancies per 1000 patients, while that for second thyroid carcinomas was 1.6 malignancies per 1000 patients. The study by Taylor et al. did not provide the total number of patients with leukemia despite reporting that of patients with leukemia who developed thyroid cancer, and hence, it was excluded from further calculations [27]. Thus, considering 17 studies, the crude incidence of second thyroid carcinomas among patients with childhood leukemia was 1.5 malignancies per 1000 patients. However, there was great heterogeneity across studies, with the effect size (% rate) ranging from 0.045% in the study by Bhatia et al. to 100% in the studies by Achaya et al. and Martucci et al. Removing these two later studies as major outliers did not have a major impact on incidence (1.4 per 1000 persons), as both studies included only a few patients [12,15,20]. The additional removal of three more studies reporting quite high rates of thyroid cancer among childhood leukemia patients (Gow et al.: 35.3%, Koh et al.: 11.1%, Oudin et al.: 52% [18,19,22]) also did not change the crude incidence (1.1 per 1000 patients) significantly.

3.5. Risk Factors for the Development of Thyroid Cancer

Most of the included studies did not specifically attempt to determine risk factors for the development of thyroid cancer, specifically, but rather for the development of second malignancies, in general.
Across the studies, the emerging risk for the development of second malignancies was the regimens used to treat the primary malignancies, including radiation, allogenic bone marrow transplantation, and chemotherapy agents, with radiation-based regimens being associated with greater risk than other regimens [26,29]. Seventeen of the eighteen included studies reported the use of radiotherapy to treat leukemia, either as monotherapy or in combination with other regimens (Table 2). Bhatia et al. reported that patients who received 2400 cGY of radiation therapy for primary ALL had a significantly higher risk of developing thyroid cancer than the general population (relative risk of 30.8; 95% CI = 1.2–62.9) [15]. Furthermore, Veiga et al. found that, across all primary tumors, all regimens that included radiation directed to the thyroid (regardless of the dose) significantly increased the risk of thyroid cancer compared to chemotherapy alone [29]. Interestingly, in patients who received radiation doses <2000 cGy, the use of chemotherapy, and particularly of anthracyclines and alkylating agents, was associated with a 4-fold higher risk for thyroid cancer. Similar results were reported by Taylor et al., whereby 88% of the 50 childhood cancer survivors with thyroid SPM included in their study had received radiation directed either within or close to the thyroid gland, with doses ranging from 1000 to 4600 cGy [27]. Of the 50 survivors, 9 had survived childhood ALL and had received radiotherapy to the whole brain, imposing a risk of exposure of the thyroid [27]. Total body irradiation at high doses (≥1000 cGy of singledose or ≥1300 cGy of fractionated) was reported to be associated with a higher risk of solid cancers [26]. In the study by Borgmann et al., SPMs were significantly associated with stem cell transplantation, high cumulative doses of cranial irradiation (>1800 cGy), as well as with etoposide and cyclophosphamide regimens [16]. In contrast, Oudin et al. reported only a trend for the risk imposed by the type of treatment followed for leukemia [22].
The age at childhood leukemia diagnosis also appeared as an important factor for developing SPM. Maule et al. highlighted that patients diagnosed with leukemia at the age of 1–4 years were more prone to developing second malignancies, including thyroid cancer [21]. The authors pointed out that such an increased risk was expected considering that the incidence of pediatric leukemia is highest within that age group [21]. Taylor et al. reported similar results, with all patients with thyroid cancer who were survivors of ALL having been diagnosed with ALL between 2 and 9 years of age [27].
Contrary to other studies, Oudin et al. found that female sex was the only significant risk factor for the development of thyroid cancer after childhood leukemia in a sample of 502 patients [cumulative incidence at 20 years: 17.1% (95% CI = 10.6–27) vs. 2.3% (95% CI = 0.6–8.2) for female and male, respectively, p < 0.001] [22]. Across most studies that provided information on the sex, most of the affected patients with SPMs were women (Table 1).

3.6. Type and Treatment of Thyroid Cancer

In most cases, the type of thyroid cancer in childhood leukemia survivors was papillary. This is consistent with data from post-Chernobyl studies reporting that more than 90% of radiation-induced thyroid neoplasms were papillary [30]. Mutations in the RET/PTC oncogene have been reported to play an important role in the development of papillary carcinomas after radiation exposure [31].
Only a few studies reported the treatment followed for second malignancies after leukemia. Borgmann et al. indicated that the treatment was personalized and followed the protocols for the specific secondary malignancy [16]. In the studies that reported the treatments followed for second thyroid cancer, most patients underwent either subtotal or total thyroidectomy, while radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation was also used in some cases [12,18,22]. For patients with lymph node involvement, cervical nodal dissection was also performed [18].

3.7. Outcomes After Second Primary Thyroid Cancer

The 5-year survival outcome after thyroid cancer was reported in 11 of 18 studies, for a total of 102 of 162 leukemia survivors with second primary thyroid cancer, all of whom were alive at follow-up, resulting in a survival rate of 100%.
When considering all patients with SPMs, Berger et al. found significantly lower survival rates in those with SPMs than in those without SPMs (59.5 ± 7.3% vs. 75.7 ± 0.8% at 5 years; p = 0.003) [14]. However, when the authors compared patients with SPMs caused by irradiation and those with SPMs unrelated to irradiation, the former seemed to have better survival rates (82.2 ± 8.1%). The authors attributed this to the higher frequency of papillary thyroid carcinoma as the SPM among these patients, which generally has a good prognosis [14]. In their study, Toret et al. investigated the survival outcomes of patients who developed SPMs after childhood leukemia [28]. The authors reported a mean survival time of 165.9 ± 23.1 months and 5-year survival rates estimated at 70%. Moreover, they found that patients with SPMs who had been diagnosed with ALL at a younger age (<5 years) had better survival outcomes than those diagnosed at a later age [28]. Notably, these findings indicate the pooled survival of all patients with SPMs and not specifically of those with second-to-thyroid cancer.
For childhood cancer survivors, including childhood leukemia survivors, Koh et al. investigated the survival outcomes in those who developed SPMs, stratifying them by the type of SPM [19]. The survival rate was much better for second thyroid cancer than for other second cancers, including AML, osteosarcomas, and central nervous system tumors [19]. Specifically, the overall 5-year survival probability for the 15 patients who developed thyroid cancer was 100%, including two ALL survivors. Consistent results were reported by other studies, including Perkins et al. in a sample of 4806 leukemia survivors among whom 18 developed thyroid cancer [23]; Oudin et al. in smaller sample of 502 patients, among whom 26 had thyroid cancer [22]; and Schiemegelow et al. in a very large sample of around 54,000 patients with ALL, among whom 32 developed thyroid cancer [25]. Gow et al. also reported 100% survival in 17 patients who developed second thyroid cancer, including six patients who had a primary diagnosis of ALL, although for a shorter median follow-up period of 3.6 (0.2–21.7) years [18]. Finally, Martucci et al. investigated the event-free survival of patients with second thyroid cancer, showing similar results to those in patients with primary thyroid cancer [20].

4. Discussion

This systematic review aimed to summarize the current evidence on the occurrence of thyroid cancer after childhood leukemia. We found that the crude incidence of second malignancies after childhood leukemia is 10.1 per 1000 patients. Of these, thyroid carcinoma occurred in 1.5 per 1000 survivors, accounting for about 15% of second malignancies in this population. The 5-year survival was 100% in all studies that reported survival outcomes.
Our findings demonstrate that thyroid cancer represents a substantial proportion of second malignancies in childhood leukemia survivors. Previous evidence indicates that thyroid cancer is one of the most common types of SPMs among all childhood cancer survivors, mainly due to exposure during therapy [32]. Given this elevated risk, childhood cancer survivors require systematic surveillance [33]. The current guidelines recommend frequent monitoring for various endocrine disorders in childhood cancer survivors to enable early detection and prompt management, ensuring optimal patient outcomes. For example, the guidelines of the Children’s Oncology Group recommend the palpation of the thyroid gland once every year, while guidelines from other societies recommend ultrasound examination once every 3–5 years [34,35]. The surveillance should be initiated within the first 5 years of any form of radiotherapy, including total body irradiation [35].
Consistent with the established literature [32], a radiation-based regimen for leukemia emerged as an important risk factor in our analysis. Among the included studies in our review, all reported the use of radiotherapy except one that did not provide information on the treatment used for leukemia. Radiation exposure was previously identified as a significant risk factor for thyroid cancer among adults, even when used at low levels for diagnostic purposes [36]. However, results in adult cancer patients are not as strong as in pediatrics. A previous systematic review and meta-analysis indicated no significant risk of thyroid cancer development following radiation therapy in adult patients, although it stressed that more research is needed on the topic [8]. This discrepancy between children and adults is expected because of the higher sensitivity of the pediatric thyroid gland to radiation [37]. Other risk factors for thyroid cancer in childhood leukemia survivors identified via our systematic review included a young age at leukemia diagnosis and female sex, in agreement with a previous pooled analysis of 16,757 childhood cancer survivors [38].
Beyond incidence and risk factors, treatment outcomes of thyroid cancer are encouraging. In our review, the reported treatment approaches generally followed the current guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer, which indicate total thyroidectomy as the preferred option [39]. Thyroidectomy may be followed by the administration of RAI, which may help reduce the incidence of thyroid cancer or treat any persistent thyroid disease. The use of RAI is, however, preserved for patients with high-risk thyroid cancer and is not recommended for patients at low risk [39]. Treatment variations according to the patient presentation were documented in one study, such as nodal dissection in patients who had lymph node involvement [18]. Overall, these treatments have excellent outcomes, especially in early-stage thyroid cancer [40]. In agreement, our systematic review indicated a 100% survival rate for at least 5 years in patients with second thyroid cancer following leukemia.

Limitations

The study results should be considered in light of certain limitations. The main limitation was the limited number of studies focusing solely on patients with ALL, which did not allow us to calculate the incidence of second thyroid cancer specifically in this cohort but rather in all patients with leukemia, including ALL, AML, CML, and biphenotypic acute leukemia (Table 1). Another limitation is that we only calculated the crude incidence of thyroid cancer and did not conduct a meta-analysis. This was, firstly, because the sample size of leukemia survivors was quite small in some studies (e.g., only two patients had leukemia, both of whom developed thyroid cancer), and second, because only patients with thyroid cancer as an SPM had been included according to the selection criteria in other studies. In both cases, this resulted in an incidence of second thyroid cancer of 100%, which is far from the true occurrence of this SPM in childhood leukemia survivors. Furthermore, we did not conduct a meta-analysis of the survival outcomes. Although such an analysis was possible, we considered it would not have provided any additional information, since the survival rates were 100% in all studies that reported this outcome after thyroid cancer. Finally, since none of the identified studies investigated the prognostic impact of the occurrence of thyroid cancer in childhood leukemia survivors, we could not conclude whether these patients are at risk of developing third cancers or other comorbidities.

5. Conclusions

We found that thyroid carcinomas account for ~15% of secondary malignancies after childhood leukemia, including ALL, with a crude incidence of approximately 1.5 per 1000 patients. Radiation exposure remains a significant risk factor despite its overall reduced use for the treatment of leukemia in the last few decades. Although survival rates among these patients remain high (100% according to our analysis), children who have survived leukemia should be regularly monitored for the appearance of second thyroid cancer to ensure prompt treatment. Our study sets the basis for further research to determine the incidence and outcomes of thyroid cancer in childhood ALL survivors and to develop novel, radiation-free therapies to reduce the associated risks. Since our findings are based mainly on the subgroup analyses of various cohort studies, a future meta-analysis of larger cohorts of patients with ALL is necessary. Moreover, while establishing the incidence of thyroid cancer after childhood leukemia is important, it is also necessary to establish the prognostic implications of these malignancies later in the life of these patients. This may help inform care and follow-up. The careful analysis of the associated risk factors might also help prevent the development of these second malignancies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.R.T., E.P.K., S.K., E.H., A.T. and A.G.-T.; methodology, V.R.T., E.P.K., S.K. and A.G.-T.; software, V.R.T. and A.G.-T.; validation, V.R.T., A.T., E.H. and A.G.-T.; formal analysis, V.R.T., E.P.K., S.K., A.T., E.H. and A.G.-T.; investigation, V.R.T. and A.G.-T.; resources, V.R.T. and A.G.-T.; data curation, V.R.T. and A.G.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, V.R.T., E.P.K., S.K., E.H., A.T. and A.G.-T.; writing—review and editing, V.R.T., E.P.K., S.K., E.H., A.T. and A.G.-T.; visualization, V.R.T., E.P.K. and S.K.; supervision, V.R.T. and A.G.-T.; project administration, V.R.T. and A.G.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that no external funding was received related to this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ALLacute lymphoblastic leukemia
AMLacute myelogenous leukemia
CMLchronic myeloid leukemia
IRBInstitutional Review Board
NOSNewcastle Ottawa Scale
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
RAIradioactive iodine
SEERSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
SPMsecond primary malignancies

References

  1. Tower, R.L.; Spector, L.G. The Epidemiology of Childhood Leukemia with a Focus on Birth Weight and Diet. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2007, 44, 203–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marcotte, E.L.; Spector, L.G.; Mendes-De-Almeida, D.P.; Nelson, H.H. The prenatal origin of childhood leukemia: Potential applications for epidemiology and newborn screening. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 639479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Metayer, C.; Milne, E.; Clavel, J.; Infante-Rivard, C.; Petridou, E.; Taylor, M.; Schüz, J.; Spector, L.G.; Dockerty, J.D.; Magnani, C.; et al. The Childhood Leukemia International Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013, 37, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Greaves, M.F.; Wiemels, J. Origins of Chromosome Translocations in Childhood Leukaemia. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bhatia, S.; Tonorezos, E.S.; Landier, W. Clinical Care for People Who Survive Childhood Cancer: A Review. JAMA 2023, 330, 1175–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Friedman, D.L.; Whitton, J.; Leisenring, W.; Mertens, A.C.; Hammond, S.; Stovall, M.; Donaldson, S.S.; Meadows, A.T.; Robison, L.L.; Neglia, J.P. Subsequent Neoplasms in 5-Year Survivors of Childhood Cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2010, 102, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Demoor-Goldschmidt, C.; De Vathaire, F. Review of Risk Factors of Secondary Cancers among Cancer Survivors. Br. J. Radiol. 2019, 92, 20180390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mirkatouli, N.B.; Hirota, S.; Yoshinaga, S. Thyroid Cancer Risk after Radiation Exposure in Adults-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Radiat. Res. 2023, 64, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jairam, V.; Roberts, K.B.; Yu, J.B. Historical Trends in the Use of Radiation for Pediatric Cancers: 1973–2008. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 85, e151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Landman, A.J.E.M.C.; Don, E.E.; Vissers, G.; Ket, H.C.J.; Oudijk, M.A.; de Groot, C.J.M.; Huirne, J.A.F.; de Boer, M.A. Modified Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and AHRQ Standards. PLoS ONE 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Acharya, S.; Sarafoglou, K.; LaQuaglia, M.; Lindsley, S.; Gerald, W.; Wollner, N.; Tan, C.; Sklar, C. Thyroid Neoplasms after Therapeutic Radiation for Malignancies during Childhood or Adolescence. Cancer 2003, 97, 2397–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bebeshko, V.G.; Bruslova, K.M.; Lyashenko, L.O.; Tsvietkova, N.M.; Galkina, S.G.; Yaroshenko, Z.S.; Gonchar, L.O.; Boyarska, O.Y.; Kuzmenko, V.F.; Trykhlib, I.V.; et al. Thyroid disease in the late observation period upon chemo and radiotherapy in children/survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Probl. Radiac. Med. Radiobiol. 2021, 26, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Berger, C.; Trombert-Paviot, B.; Casagranda, L.; Mialou, V.; Frappaz, D.; Plantaz, D.; Collardeau-Frachon, S.; Freycon, F. Second Malignant Neoplasms Following Childhood Cancer: A Study of a Recent Cohort (1987–2004) from the Childhood Cancer Registry of the Rhône-Alpes Region (ARCERRA) in France. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2011, 28, 364–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bhatia, S.; Sather, H.N.; Pabustan, O.B.; Trigg, M.E.; Gaynon, P.S.; Robison, L.L. Low Incidence of Second Neoplasms among Children Diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after 1983. Blood 2002, 99, 4257–4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Borgmann, A.; Zinn, C.; Hartmann, R.; Herold, R.; Kaatsch, P.; Escherich, G.; Möricke, A.; Henze, G.; von Stackelberg, A. Secondary malignant neoplasms after intensive treatment of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood. Eur. J. Cancer 2008, 44, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Echecopar, C.; del Val Rey, I.; Galán-Gómez, V.; González-Pérez, C.; Mozo del Castillo, Y.; González Martínez, B.; Pérez-Martínez, A. The Paradigm of Total Body Irradiation in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: Therapeutic Effectiveness versus the Challenges of Toxicity. An. Pediatr. 2024, 100, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gow, K.W.; Lensing, S.; Hill, D.A.; Krasin, M.J.; McCarville, M.B.; Rai, S.N.; Zacher, M.; Spunt, S.L.; Strickland, D.K.; Hudson, M.M. Thyroid Carcinoma Presenting in Childhood or after Treatment of Childhood Malignancies: An Institutional Experience and Review of the Literature. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2003, 38, 1574–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Koh, K.N.; Yoo, K.H.; Im, H.J.; Sung, K.W.; Koo, H.H.; Kim, H.S.; Han, J.W.; Yoon, J.H.; Park, H.J.; Park, B.K.; et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of Second Malignant Neoplasms after Childhood Cancer Treatment: Multi-Center Retrospective Survey. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2016, 31, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martucci, C.; Crocoli, A.; De Pasquale, M.D.; Spinelli, C.; Strambi, S.; Brazzarola, P.; Morelli, E.; Cassiani, J.; Mancera, J.; Luengas, J.P.; et al. Thyroid Cancer in Children: A Multicenter International Study Highlighting Clinical Features and Surgical Outcomes of Primary and Secondary Tumors. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 914942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maule, M.; Scélo, G.; Pastore, G.; Brennan, P.; Hemminki, K.; Tracey, E.; Sankila, R.; Weiderpass, E.; Olsen, J.H.; McBride, M.L.; et al. Risk of Second Malignant Neoplasms after Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma: An International Study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007, 99, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Oudin, C.; Auquier, P.; Bertrand, Y.; Chastagner, P.; Kanold, J.; Poirée, M.; Thouvenin, S.; Ducassou, S.; Plantaz, D.; Tabone, M.D.; et al. Late Thyroid Complications in Survivors of Childhood Acute Leukemia. An L.E.A. Study. Haematologica 2016, 101, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Perkins, S.M.; DeWees, T.; Shinohara, E.T.; Reddy, M.M.; Frangoul, H. Risk of Subsequent Malignancies in Survivors of Childhood Leukemia. J. Cancer Surviv. 2013, 7, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Renard, M.; Suciu, S.; Bertrand, Y.; Uyttebroeck, A.; Ferster, A.; van der Werff ten Bosch, J.; Mazingue, F.; Plouvier, E.; Robert, A.; Boutard, P.; et al. Second Neoplasm in Children Treated in EORTC 58881 Trial for Acute Lymphoblastic Malignancies: Low Incidence of CNS Tumours. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2011, 57, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schiemegelow, K.; Levinsen, M.F.; Attarbaschi, A.; Baruchel, A.; Devidas, M.; Escherich, G.; Gibson, B.; Heydrich, C.; Horibe, K.; Ishida, Y.; et al. Second Malignant Neoplasms after Treatment of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2469–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Socié, G.; Curtis, R.E.; Deeg, H.J.; Sobocinski, K.A.; Filipovich, A.H.; Travis, L.B.; Sullivan, K.M.; Rowlings, P.A.; Kingma, D.W.; Banks, P.M.; et al. New Malignant Diseases after Allogeneic Marrow Transplantation for Childhood Acute Leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2000, 18, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Taylor, A.J.; Croft, A.P.; Palace, A.M.; Winter, D.L.; Reulen, R.C.; Stiller, C.A.; Stevens, M.C.G.; Hawkins, M.M. Risk of Thyroid Cancer in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Results from the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 125, 2400–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Toret, E.; Aytac, S.; Guzelkucuk, Z.; Celkan, T.; Genc, D.B.; Sezgin-Evim, M.; Cakmakli, H.F.; Bahadir, A.; Karapinar, T.H.; Oren, H.; et al. Prognosis of Second Primary Malignancies in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Survivors: A Multicenter Study by the Turkish Pediatric Hematology Society. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2024, 46, e363–e367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Veiga, L.H.S.; Bhatti, P.; Ronckers, C.M.; Sigurdson, A.J.; Stovall, M.; Smith, S.A.; Weathers, R.; Leisenring, W.; Mertens, A.C.; Hammond, S.; et al. Chemotherapy and Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2012, 21, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Williams, D. Twenty Years’ Experience with Post-Chernobyl Thyroid Cancer. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 22, 1061–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prescott, J.D.; Zeiger, M.A. The RET Oncogene in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancer 2015, 121, 2137–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lorenz, E.; Scholz-Kreisel, P.; Baaken, D.; Pokora, R.; Blettner, M. Radiotherapy for Childhood Cancer and Subsequent Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2018, 33, 1139–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hudson, M.M.; Bhatia, S.; Casillas, J.; Landier, W. Long-Term Follow-up Care for Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors. Pediatrics 2021, 148, e2021053127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tonorezos, E.S.; Barnea, D.; Moskowitz, C.S.; Chou, J.F.; Sklar, C.A.; Elkin, E.B.; Wong, R.J.; Li, D.; Tuttle, R.M.; Korenstein, D.; et al. Screening for Thyroid Cancer in Survivors of Childhood and Young Adult Cancer Treated with Neck Radiation. J. Cancer Surviv. 2016, 11, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Van Iersel, L.; Mulder, R.L.; Denzer, C.; Cohen, L.E.; Spoudeas, H.A.; Meacham, L.R.; Sugden, E.; Schouten-Van Meeteren, A.Y.N.; Hoving, E.W.; Packer, R.J.; et al. Hypothalamic-Pituitary and Other Endocrine Surveillance Among Childhood Cancer Survivors. Endocr. Rev. 2022, 43, 794–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Han, M.A.; Kim, J.H. Diagnostic X-Ray Exposure and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thyroid 2018, 28, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sinnott, B.; Ron, E.; Schneider, A.B. Exposing the Thyroid to Radiation: A Review of Its Current Extent, Risks, and Implications. Endocr. Rev. 2010, 31, 756–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Veiga, L.H.S.; Lubin, J.H.; Anderson, H.; De Vathaire, F.; Tucker, M.; Bhatti, P.; Schneider, A.; Johansson, R.; Inskip, P.; Kleinerman, R.; et al. A Pooled Analysis of Thyroid Cancer Incidence Following Radiotherapy for Childhood Cancer. Radiat. Res. 2012, 178, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Filetti, S.; Durante, C.; Hartl, D.; Leboulleux, S.; Locati, L.D.; Newbold, K.; Papotti, M.G.; Berruti, A. Thyroid Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1856–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. American Cancer Society. Thyroid Cancer Survival Rates, by Type and Stage. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/thyroid-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html (accessed on 7 March 2025).
Figure 1. PRISMA diagram summarizing the search strategy of the included studies, along with reasons for excluding studies.
Figure 1. PRISMA diagram summarizing the search strategy of the included studies, along with reasons for excluding studies.
Jcm 14 04248 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
StudyStudy SettingType of LeukemiaTreatment for LeukemiaSample Size (Total/
Leukemia)
No./Sex of Patients with Second MalignanciesAge at Diagnosis of Leukemia or of Primary Malignancy (Years) aTime to Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis After Leukemia (Years)Type of Thyroid CancerTreatment for Thyroid CancerReported OutcomesSurvival at 5 Years After Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis
Total/
After Leukemia
Thyroid Cancer After Leukemia
Acharya et al., 2003 [12]USAALL and AMLRadiation therapy33/313/33 F (2 after ALL and
1 after AML)
5.6 ± 1.015.3 ± 3.3Follicular and papillaryNear-total thyroidectomy and RAI therapyThyroid neoplasms after radiation therapyNR
Bebeshko et al., 2021 [13]UkraineALLStandard chemotherapy and radiotherapy92/921/11 FNR11PapillaryNRIncidence of thyroid diseaseNR
Berger et al., 2011 [14]FranceALL and CMLTBI (n = 11), allogeneic
marrow transplantation (n = 11)
2907/85454 (28 F)/213 (2 after ALL and 1 after CML)7.8 ± 5.515.0 ± 5.8NSNRIncidence of second malignancy and patient outcomes3/3
Bhatia et al., 2002 [15]USA and CanadaALLCP (100%), anthracyclines (100%), and radiation (50%)8831/883163/634 (2F and 2M)2.9 (1.5–4.0)9.7 (5.5–11.8)PapillaryNRRisk of developing second malignancy4/4
Borgman et al., 2008 [16]GermanyALLCranial irradiation, TBI, multi-drug chemotherapy protocols1376/137621/212 (1F and 1M)5.1 ± 0.715.7 ± 6.9NSNS (treatment based on disease-specific protocol)Cumulative incidence of secondary malignancy2/2
Echecopar et al., 2024 [17]SpainALLTBI ± HSCT or HSCT alone57/577/726.3 ± 3.9 bNRFollicularNRSurvival of ALL patients after TBINR
Gow et al., 2003 [18]USAALLChemotherapy + radiation (70.6%), chemotherapy only (5.9%), radiation only (11.8%)17/1717 (13 F)/66NR16.2 (0.9–29.2)Papillary (88.2%) and follicular (11.8%)Total thyroidectomy, cervical nodal dissection, and RAI ablationOutcomes of thyroid carcinoma6/6
Koh et al., 2016 [19]KoreaALL, AML, BALChemotherapy, TBI, and HSCT102/1818/1826.6 (0–19.7) c6.8 (4.1–18.5) cPapillaryThyroidectomyOutcomes of second malignancy2/2
Martucci et al., 2022 [20]Italy, Brazil, UK, Argentina, and FranceALLRadiotherapy255/513/5514 (1–18.4) c9.0 ± 4.8Adenoma and papillaryHemi- or total thyroidectomySurvival5/5
Maule et al., 2007 [21]Australia, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Scotland, Iceland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain, and SingaporeNSNR16,540/ 12,731133/ 6791–1410–19NSNRCumulative incidence of thyroid cancerNR
Oudin et al., 2016 [22]FranceALL and AMLCNS irradiation, HSCT with or without prior TBI502/50226/26267.4 ± 0.2 bNR
Age at diagnosis of TC: 20.5 (17.1–24.1)
PapillaryRAI therapy and subtotal or total thyroidectomyPrevalence and risk factors for thyroid cancer26/26
Perkins et al., 2013 [23]USAALL and AMLRadiation therapy4806/480682/8218 (16 after ALL; 14 F)7.0 (0–18.0)~7–35.5NSNRSurvival of primary and second malignancy18/18
Renard et al., 2011 [24]USAALLRadiotherapy and regimens including topoisomerase-II inhibitors, HSCT2216/207722/202 F5.0 ± 1.05.5 ± 0.9PapillaryNRIncidence of second malignancy2/2
Schiemegelow et al., 2013 [25]North America, Europe, and AsiaALLCP, EPT, CNS irradiation54,058/54,058642/64232 (17 F)5.0 (3.1–6.5)10.1 (7.8–13.5)NSNRIncidence of second malignancy and survival32/32
Socie’ et al., 2000 [26]USAALLAllogeneic BMT, conditioning regimen (TBI or limited field irradiation ± CP ± other drugs), SCT3182/2022 d45/452 d7.4 ± 2.6 e7.7 ± 4.5PapillaryNRRisk of developing second malignancy2/2
Taylor et al., 2009 [27]UKALL and AMLTBI, cranial radiotherapy, chemotherapy17,980/NS50 (31 F)/1313 (9 after ALL and
4 after AML)
2–148–33Papillary, follicular, otherNRCumulative incidence of thyroid carcinomaNR
Toret et al., 2024 [28]TurkeyALLCranial radiotherapy (39%), HSCT (12%), TBI (12%)10,360/10,36041/4155.3 ± 4.318.9 ± 8.4 fNSNRSurvivalNR
Veiga et al., 2012 [29]USA and CanadaNSChemotherapy (alkylating agents, anthracyclines, bleomycin, platinum compounds, and EPT), radiotherapy12,547/4261119/27275.7 ± 4.021.0 ± 7.7Papillary and mixed papillary, follicular, otherNRCumulative incidence of thyroid cancer according to the treatment regimenNR
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; BAL, biphenotypic acute leukemia; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; CP, cyclophosphamide; EPT, epipodophyllotoxin; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; NR, not reported; NS, not specified; RAI, radioactive iodine; SCT, stem cell transplant; TBI, total body irradiation; TC, thyroid cancer. The age at leukemia diagnosis and time to thyroid cancer diagnosis are presented as mean ± standard deviation or as median (IQR or range). These data were collected from each study or calculated using Microsoft Excel according to the provided raw data for individual patients. a patients with leukemia who developed thyroid cancer unless otherwise specified; b entire sample, not only to patients with thyroid cancer as SPMs after leukemia; c entire sample, not only to patients with leukemia; d includes only cases of ALL and excludes cases of non-lymphocytic leukemia and cases of acute leukemia undifferentiated or not otherwise specified; e age at BMT; f latency for diagnosis of all second solid tumors in the sample, not only thyroid cancer.
Table 2. Disease and treatment characteristics.
Table 2. Disease and treatment characteristics.
Study Type of LeukemiaTreatment for
Leukemia
Radiation Dose (cGy)Age at Diagnosis of Leukemia or of Primary Malignancy (Years) aTime to Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis After Leukemia (Years)Type of Thyroid CancerTreatment for Thyroid CancerSurvival at 5 Years After Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis
Acharya et al., 2003 [12] ALL and AMLRadiation therapy1000–18005.6 ± 1.015.3 ± 3.3Follicular and papillary Near-total thyroidectomy and RAI therapyNR
Bebeshko et al., 2021 [13] ALLStandard chemotherapy and radiotherapy 1200–1800NR11 Papillary NRNR
Berger et al., 2011 [14] ALL and CMLTBI and allogeneic
marrow transplantation
12007.8 ± 5.515.0 ± 5.8PapillaryNR3/3
Bhatia et al., 2002 [15] ALLCP (100%), anthracyclines (100%), and radiation (50%)1800–24002.9 (1.5–4.0)9.7 (5.5–11.8)Papillary NR4/4
Borgman et al., 2008 [16] ALLCranial irradiation, TBI, multi-drug chemotherapy protocols Cranial: 1800–2400
TBI: 1200
5.1 ± 0.7 15.7 ± 6.9NSNS (treatment based on disease-specific protocol)2/2
Echecopar et al., 2024 [17] ALLTBI ± HSCT or HSCT aloneNR6.3 ± 3.9 bNRFollicular NRNR
Gow et al., 2003 [18] ALLchemotherapy + radiation (70.6%), chemotherapy only (5.9%), radiation only (11.8%) NSNR16.2 (0.9–29.2)Papillary (88.2%); follicular (11.8%)Total thyroidectomy, cervical nodal dissection, and RAI ablation6/6
Koh et al., 2016 [19] ALL, AML, BALChemotherapy, TBI, and HSCTNR6.6 (0–19.7) c6.8 (4.1–18.5) cPapillary Thyroidectomy2/2
Martucci et al., 2022 [20] ALLRadiotherapyNR14 (1–18.4) c9.0 ± 4.8Adenoma and papillary Hemi- or total thyroidectomy 5/5
Maule et al., 2007 [21] NSNRNR1–1410–19NSNRNR
Oudin et al., 2016 [22] ALL and AMLCNS irradiation and HSCT with or without prior TBI1800 and 24007.4 ± 0.2 bNR
Age at diagnosis of TC: 20.5 (17.1–24.1)
Papillary RAI therapy and subtotal or total thyroidectomy26/26
Perkins et al., 2013 [23] ALL and AMLRadiation therapyNR7.0 (0–18.0)~7–35.5NSNR18/18
Renard et al., 2011 [24] ALLRadiotherapy and regimens including topoisomerase-II inhibitors and HSCTNR5.0 ± 1.05.5 ± 0.9Papillary NR 2/2
Schiemegelow et al., 2013 [25] ALLCP, EPT, CNS irradiation NR5.0 (3.1–6.5)10.1 (7.8–13.5)NSNR32/32
Socie’ et al., 2000 [26] ALLAllogeneic BMT, conditioning regimen (TBI or limited field irradiation ± CP ± other drugs), SCT low dose or high dose (≥1000 single-dose or ≥1300 fractionated)7.4 ± 2.6 d7.7 ± 4.5Papillary NR2/2
Taylor et al., 2009 [27] ALL and AMLTBI, cranial radiotherapy, chemotherapyCranial: 1000–2500
TBI: 1000
2–148–33Papillary, follicular, otherNRNR
Toret et al., 2024 [28]ALLCranial radiotherapy (39%), HSCT (12%),
TBI (12%)
NR5.3 ± 4.318.9 ± 8.4 eNSNRNR
Veiga et al., 2012 [29] NSChemotherapy (alkylating agents, anthracyclines, bleomycin, platinum compounds, and EPT) and radiotherapy 0–40005.7 ± 4.0 21.0 ± 7.7Papillary and mixed papillary, follicular, otherNRNR
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; BAL, biphenotypic acute leukemia; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; CP, cyclophosphamide; EPT, epipodophyllotoxin; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; NR, not reported; NS, not specified; RAI, radioactive iodine; SCT, stem cell transplant; TBI, total body irradiation; TC, thyroid cancer. The age at leukemia diagnosis and time to thyroid cancer diagnosis are presented as mean ± standard deviation or as median (IQR or range). These data were collected from each study or calculated using Microsoft Excel according to the provided raw data for individual patients. a patients with leukemia who developed thyroid cancer unless otherwise specified; b entire sample, not only to patients with thyroid cancer as SPMs after leukemia; c entire sample, not only to patients with leukemia; d includes only cases of ALL and excludes cases of non-lymphocytic leukemia and cases of acute leukemia undifferentiated or not otherwise specified; e age at BMT; f latency for diagnosis of all second solid tumors in the sample, not only thyroid cancer.
Table 3. The methodological quality of the included studies.
Table 3. The methodological quality of the included studies.
Study ID
(Authors; Reference)
Selection
(Maximum
of 3 Stars)
Comparability
(Maximum of
2 Stars)
Outcomes
(Maximum
of 3 Stars)
Quality
Assessment a
Acharya et al., 2003 [12]313Good
Bebeshko et al., 2021 [13]213Fair
Berger et al., 2011 [14]323Good
Bhatia et al., 2002 [15]313Good
Borgman et al., 2008 [16]313Good
Echecopar et al., 2024 [17]313Good
Gow et al., 2003 [18]313Good
Koh et al., 2016 [19]312Good
Martucci et al., 2022 [20]313Good
Maule et al., 2007 [21]323Good
Oudin et al., 2016 [22]323Good
Perkins et al., 2013 [23]323Good
Renard et al., 2011 [24]313Good
Schiemegelow et al., 2013 [25]323Good
Socie’ et al., 2000 [26] 323Good
Taylor et al., 2009 [27]313Good
Toret et al., 2024 [28]313Good
Veiga et al., 2012 [29]323Good
AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. a quality assessment as per the AHRQ standard [11].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsinopoulou, V.R.; Kotanidou, E.P.; Kolanis, S.; Tragiannidis, A.; Hatzipantelis, E.; Galli-Tsinopoulou, A. Thyroid Cancer in Childhood Leukemia Survivors: A Systematic Review of the Incidence and Survival Outcomes. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124248

AMA Style

Tsinopoulou VR, Kotanidou EP, Kolanis S, Tragiannidis A, Hatzipantelis E, Galli-Tsinopoulou A. Thyroid Cancer in Childhood Leukemia Survivors: A Systematic Review of the Incidence and Survival Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(12):4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsinopoulou, Vasiliki Rengina, Eleni P. Kotanidou, Savvas Kolanis, Athanasios Tragiannidis, Emmanouel Hatzipantelis, and Assimina Galli-Tsinopoulou. 2025. "Thyroid Cancer in Childhood Leukemia Survivors: A Systematic Review of the Incidence and Survival Outcomes" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 12: 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124248

APA Style

Tsinopoulou, V. R., Kotanidou, E. P., Kolanis, S., Tragiannidis, A., Hatzipantelis, E., & Galli-Tsinopoulou, A. (2025). Thyroid Cancer in Childhood Leukemia Survivors: A Systematic Review of the Incidence and Survival Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(12), 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop