Next Article in Journal
Reply to Trudzinski et al. Comment on “Akil et al. Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3750”
Previous Article in Journal
CA125 as a Potential Biomarker in Non-Malignant Serous Effusions: Diagnostic and Prognostic Considerations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

MRI-Based Prediction of Meniscal Tear Repairability Demonstrates Limited Accuracy and Reliability

1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38104, USA
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, 3301 C Street, Suite 1600, Sacramento, CA 95816, USA
3
Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4160; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124160
Submission received: 1 May 2025 / Revised: 3 June 2025 / Accepted: 8 June 2025 / Published: 11 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Sports Medicine)

Abstract

Background: While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to identify meniscal tears, intraoperative assessment typically dictates repairability. This study evaluated whether a simplified MRI-based scoring system could reliably predict meniscal repair versus meniscectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent meniscectomy or meniscal repair between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative MRIs were independently reviewed in a blinded fashion by two radiologists and one orthopedic sports surgeon. Reviewers scored images based on four arthroscopic criteria for tear repairability, with one point awarded for each of the following criteria—(1) proximity within 4 mm of the meniscosynovial junction, (2) length >10 mm, (3) presence of intact inner meniscal segment, and (4) >50% meniscal thickness. Tears scoring four points were considered repairable. Accuracy, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated against the actual procedure performed. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using kappa statistics. The predictive performance of each individual criterion was also analyzed. Results: A total of 202 meniscal tears were included (134 meniscectomies and 68 repairs). Reviewer accuracy in predicting repairability ranged from 48% to 76%. Intraobserver reliability was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.42–0.66), whereas interobserver reliability was poor to moderate (pairwise κ = 0.07–0.43; Fleiss’ κ = 0.11). Analysis of individual MRI criteria demonstrated limited predictive value, with most criteria achieving less than 50% accuracy across reviewers. Conclusions: MRI-based prediction of meniscal repairability using arthroscopic criteria demonstrated limited accuracy and poor interobserver reliability. Overall predictive reliability remains insufficient for clinical decision-making. Further investigation, integrating advanced imaging techniques and artificial intelligence, may improve the preoperative assessment of meniscal repairability.
Keywords: meniscus; meniscal repair; MRI; repairability; reliability meniscus; meniscal repair; MRI; repairability; reliability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Holland, C.T.; Tse, S.; Bateni, C.P.; Chen, D.; Lee, C.A. MRI-Based Prediction of Meniscal Tear Repairability Demonstrates Limited Accuracy and Reliability. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4160. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124160

AMA Style

Holland CT, Tse S, Bateni CP, Chen D, Lee CA. MRI-Based Prediction of Meniscal Tear Repairability Demonstrates Limited Accuracy and Reliability. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(12):4160. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124160

Chicago/Turabian Style

Holland, Christopher T., Shannon Tse, Cyrus P. Bateni, Dillon Chen, and Cassandra A. Lee. 2025. "MRI-Based Prediction of Meniscal Tear Repairability Demonstrates Limited Accuracy and Reliability" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 12: 4160. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124160

APA Style

Holland, C. T., Tse, S., Bateni, C. P., Chen, D., & Lee, C. A. (2025). MRI-Based Prediction of Meniscal Tear Repairability Demonstrates Limited Accuracy and Reliability. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(12), 4160. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124160

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop