Next Article in Journal
Endoscopic Bridging Stent Placement Improves Bile Leaks After Hepatic Surgery
Previous Article in Journal
Healthcare Models and Quality Indicators in the Management of Patients with Heart Failure in Spain: Results from the CARABELA-HF Initiative
Previous Article in Special Issue
Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide Compared with Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Transplantation of Multiple Myeloma: A Long-Term Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Recent Advances

Program for Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico di Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3379; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103379
Submission received: 1 May 2025 / Accepted: 7 May 2025 / Published: 13 May 2025
Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation was the first form of cell therapy to be developed [1,2] and is still a cornerstone in treating hematologic malignancies [3,4]. One limitation of allogeneic transplantation is its toxicity, and many complications may follow the transplant; these complications affect various organs and, in some cases, may be severe enough to determine treatment-related mortality [5].
Initially, toxicity was thought to be caused essentially by the high doses of radio-chemotherapy administered [6], and in addition, it was shown that the activation of the coagulation pathway [7] and endothelial dysfunction [8] were contributing factors. Later, it became clear that alloreactivity is a crucial determinant of endothelial dysfunction after allogeneic HSCT [8,9].
This Special Issue of JCM, dedicated to advancements in HSCT, includes fifteen papers, one of which is an extensive review of the mechanisms of endothelial damage after allogeneic transplantation [10]. This review also highlights treatments with new agents, such as drugs which are active on the Ang 1/Ang 2 axis, moderators of thrombin activation, thrombomodulin, and the pleiotropic agent defibrotide.
Another aspect that, together with toxicity, reduces the success rate of the transplant technique is the recurrence of underlying haematological malignancies. The optimisation of the eradication conditioning phase could reduce the risk of post-transplant recurrence, as determined in a review by Jethava YS [11]. This can be attempted by incorporating into conditioning drug-conjugated monoclonal antibodies or antibody–radionuclide conjugates targeting CD45 or other antigens present in neoplastic or leukaemic cells [12,13,14]. In this JCM Special Issue, a study by Stoffel T et al. investigated the association of Polatuzumab vedotin, a drug-conjugated monoclonal antibody, with the high-dose and eradicating chemotherapy regimen BeAM which is used for conditioning to an autologous transplant in patients affected by relapsed or refractory NHL [15]. Polatuzumab vedotin is an anti-CD79b antibody that is conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, a microtubule inhibitor. Although preliminary and obtained from only 12 patients affected by NHL, the results were encouraging. With a median follow-up of one and a half years, 11/12 patients were in CR. Further studies incorporating other monoclonal antibodies active in B-cell-type neoplasia are awaited.
In this JCM Special Issue, the results obtained from multiple myeloma patients receiving transplants in the outpatient setting are described. The study by K Larsen et al., carried out at the MM Center in Little Rock [16], described 500 of such procedures. Sixty-one percent of the patients were treated under an outpatient regime, and in these patients, the hospitalisation rate was 31.6%; the remaining portion of patients (68.4%) did not require hospitalisation. The predictive factors for admission were female sex, age, and type of conditioning. The safety of the technique was confirmed with a low TRM: 0.5% in the first 30 days in the overall series of the first autologous HSCT, whereas the TRM at 100 days was 2.9%.
One of the major advances in this field over the past decade has been the use of high-dose cyclophosphamide at an early stage after allogeneic transplantation (CTX-post), which has allowed the use of donors with limited HLA compatibility (haploidentical family donors) [17,18]. CTX-post has also broadened the number of candidates for HSCT, especially for patients whose ethnicity is under-represented in the donor registry [19]. CTX-post may be used in graft-versus-host prophylaxis from donors other than those who are haploidentical [20]. However, the advantage of CTX-post compared to other types of GVHD prophylaxis in the UD setting is not firmly established. An area that has attracted interest from many clinical investigators is the use of CTX-post in combination with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) [21,22,23,24]. In this Special Issue, a group from S. Raffaele Hospital reports on their experience combining, in haploidentical transplantations, a post-transplant dose of ATG with the standard dose of post-transplant cyclophosphamide [25].
Determining the most convenient donor is a topic that, over time, has increased in importance. Since CTX-post allows for the safe clinical use of a haploidentical family donor, each patient has an increased number of possible donors compared to the past, and thus, in everyday practice, the choice between unrelated donors and haploidentical donors is often encountered [26,27,28]. In this JCM issue, advice is provided regarding the choice of the donor [29]. According to the author, the selection criteria should differ based on the degree of donor/recipient compatibility (10/10 HLA match versus 7/8 HLA match).
Graft failure is a rare but severe complication of HSCT [30] that may be observed in sensitised patients who have high anti-HLA titres and in patients with specific underlying haematological pathologies, such as thalassemia and myelofibrosis. Intensifying pre-transplant immunosuppression is an effective way to reduce graft failure [31]. In this JCM issue, Mulas and colleagues [32] reviewed the conditioning of thalassemia patients, which now includes an intensive immunosuppressive phase.
Diseases based on an autoimmune mechanism are increasingly treated via autologous hematopoietic transplants. High doses of chemotherapy and autologous support have been adopted for more than 20 years in multiple sclerosis treatment, as determined in the review by H Zephir [33]. Autologous HSCT is effective in relapsing–remitting subtypes of multiple sclerosis, as highlighted in this JCM Special Issue [34].
In the future, the introduction of new drugs and new cellular therapies will reduce the need for autologous transplantation in the treatment of lymphomas and multiple myeloma. However, these new approaches will be limited by their high cost compared to the wide applicability of high doses of chemotherapy supported by transplantation. Furthermore, new drugs, such as bispecific monoclonal antibodies, CAR-T cells, check-point inhibitors, and, in general, all-targeted pharmacological therapies, would benefit from the existence of synergy with the graft-versus-tumour effect after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Conceivably, these agents will also have synergy with autologous transplantation. Therefore, an area of clinical research that will be pursued in the future is the integration of these therapies [35,36].
Hopefully, in the coming years, other innovations will reach the stage of full clinical application. The selection and expansion of specific cellular lymphoid populations will allow for the goal of inhibiting acute GVHD and maintaining GVT to be achieved [37]. New ways of assessing alloreactivity will allow for a more precise means of using pharmacologic immunosuppressant drugs, while a better understanding of microbiota will be exploited with the aim of modulating alloreactivity [38,39].

Author Contributions

All authors participated in the elaboration of the concepts and in the selection of appropriate references. G.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Thomas, E.D.; Buckner, C.D.; Cheever, M.A.; Clift, R.A.; Einstein, A.B.; Fefer, A.; Neiman, P.E.; Sanders, J.; Storb, R.; Weiden, P.L. Marrow transplantation for leukemia and aplastic anemia. Transplant. Proc. 1976, 8, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weiden, P.L.; Flournoy, N.; Thomas, E.D.; Prentice, R.; Fefer, A.; Buckner, C.D.; Storb, R. Antileukemic effect of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of allogeneic-marrow grafts. N. Engl. J. Med. 1979, 300, 1068–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Döhner, H.; Wei, A.H.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Craddock, C.; DiNardo, C.D.; Dombret, H.; Ebert, B.L.; Fenaux, P.; Godley, L.A.; Hasserjian, R.P.; et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood 2022, 140, 1345–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Loke, J.; Buka, R.; Craddock, C. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: Who, when, and how? Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 659595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gooley, T.A.; Chien, J.W.; Pergam, S.A.; Hingorani, S.; Sorror, M.L.; Boeckh, M.; Martin, P.J.; Sandmaier, B.M.; Marr, K.A.; Appelbaum, F.R.; et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 2091–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  6. Bearman, S.I.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Buckner, C.D.; Petersen, F.B.; Fisher, L.D.; Clift, R.A.; Thomas, E.D. Regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. J. Clin. Oncol. 1988, 6, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Haire, W.D. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 30 (Suppl. 5), S257–S262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Carreras, E.; Diaz-Ricart, M. The role of the endothelium in the short-term complications of hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011, 46, 1495–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Palomo, M.; Diaz-Ricart, M.; Carbo, C.; Rovira, M.; Fernandez-Aviles, F.; Martine, C.; Ghita, G.; Escolar, G.; Carreras, E. Endothelial dysfunction after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Role of the conditioning regimen and the type of transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010, 16, 985–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Milone, G.; Bellofiore, C.; Leotta, S.; Milone, G.A.; Cupri, A.; Duminuco, A.; Garibaldi, B.; Palumbo, G. Endothelial Dysfunction after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Review Based on Physiopathology. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Jethava, Y.S.; Sica, S.; Savani, B.; Socola, F.; Jagasia, M.; Mohty, M.; Nagler, A.; Bacigalupo, A. Conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants in acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017, 52, 1504–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tuazon, S.A.; Sandmaier, B.M.; Gooley, T.A.; Fisher, D.R.; Holmberg, L.A.; Becker, P.S.; Lundberg, S.J.; Orozco, J.J.; Gopal, A.K.; Till, B.G.; et al. 90Y-labeled anti-CD45 antibody allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for high-risk multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021, 56, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Griffin, J.M.; Healy, F.M.; Dahal, L.N.; Floisand, Y.; Woolley, J.F. Worked to the bone: Antibody-based conditioning as the future of transplant biology. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2022, 15, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  14. Volta, L.; Myburgh, R.; Hofstetter, M.; Koch, C.; Kiefer, J.D.; Gobbi, C.; Manfredi, F.; Zimmermann, K.; Kaufmann, P.; Fazio, S.; et al. A single-chain variable fragment-based bispecific T-cell activating antibody against CD117 enables T-cell mediated lysis of acute myeloid leukemia and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Hemasphere 2024, 8, e70055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Stoffel, T.; Bacher, U.; Banz, Y.; Daskalakis, M.; Novak, U.; Pabst, T. BeEAM High-Dose Chemotherapy with Polatuzumab (Pola-BeEAM) before ASCT in Patients with DLBCL—A Pilot Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Larsen, K.; Spencer, H.; Mohan, M.; Bailey, C.; Hill, K.; Kottarathara, M.; Parikh, R.; Hoque, S.; Erra, A.; Mitma, A.A.; et al. Feasibility of Outpatient Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma and Risk Factors Predictive of Hospital Admission. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. O’Donnell, P.V.; Luznik, L.; Jones, R.J.; Vogelsang, G.B.; Leffell, M.S.; Phelps, M.; Rhubart, P.; Cowan, K.; Piantados, S.; Fuchs, E.J. Nonmyeloablative bone marrow transplantation from partially HLA-mismatched related donors using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002, 8, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Luznik, L.; O’Donnell, P.V.; Symons, H.J.; Chen, A.R.; Leffell, M.S.; Zahurak, M.; Gooley, T.A.; Piantadosi, S.; Kaup, M.; Ambinder, R.F.; et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008, 14, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Auletta, J.J.; Kou, J.; Chen, M.; Bolon, Y.T.; Broglie, L.; Bupp, C.; Christianson, D.; Cusatis, R.N.; Devine, S.M.; Eapen, M.; et al. Real-World Data Showing Trends and Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Transplant. Cell. Ther. 2023, 29, e1–e346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Bolanos-Meade, J. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duléry, R.; Brissot, E.; Mohty, M. Combining post-transplant cyclophosphamide with anti-thymocyte globulin for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in haematological malignancies. Blood Rev. 2023, 62, 101080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, Y.; Wu, D.P.; Liu, Q.F.; Xu, L.P.; Liu, K.Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Yu, W.-J.; Xu, Y.; Huang, F.; Huang, X.-J. Low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin as an effective strategy for GVHD prevention in haploidentical patients. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, T.; He, Q.; Yang, J.; Cai, Y.; Huang, C.; Xu, X.; Qiu, H.; Niu, J.; Zhou, K.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Low-Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Plus Low-Dose Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide as an Effective Regimen for Prophylaxis of Graft versus Host Disease After Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation With Maternal/Collateral Related Donors. Cell Transplant. 2022, 31, 9636897221139103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Kim, D.H.; Shin, D.Y.; Koh, Y.; Kim, I.; Yoon, S.S.; Byun, J.M.; Hong, J. Dual T-cell depletion with individually tailored anti-thymocyte globulin and attenuated dose of post-transplant cyclophosphamide in haploidentical peripheral stem cell transplantation. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. Xue, E.; Lorentino, F.; Lupo Stanghellini, M.T.; Giglio, F.; Piemontese, S.; Clerici, D.T.; Farina, F.; Mastaglio, S.; Bruno, A.; Campodonico, E.; et al. Addition of a Single Low Dose of Anti T-Lymphocyte Globulin to Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Pilot Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Barriga, F.; Lima, A.C.M. Donor selection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2024, 31, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Timofeeva, O.A.; Philogene, M.C.; Zhang, Q.J. Current donor selection strategies for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Hum. Immunol. 2022, 83, 674–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Spellman, S.R.; Sparapani, R.; Maiers, M.; Shaw, B.E.; Laud, P.; Bupp, C.; He, M.; Devine, S.M.; Logan, B.R. Novel machine learning technique further clarifies unrelated donor selection to optimize transplantation outcomes. Blood Adv. 2024, 8, 6082–6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Crocchiolo, R.; Rombolà, G. Human Leucocyte Antigen System and Selection of Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors: Impact of Patient–Donor (Mis)matching and New Challenges with the Current Technologies. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kharfan-Dabaja, M.A.; Kumar, A.; Ayala, E.; Aljurf, M.; Nishihori, T.; Marsh, R.; Burroughs, L.M.; Majhail, N.; Al-Homsi, A.S.; Al-Kadhimi, Z.S.; et al. Standardizing Definitions of Hematopoietic Recovery, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Poor Graft Function, and Donor Chimerism in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Transplant. Cell. Ther. 2021, 27, 642–649. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kongtim, P.; Vittayawacharin, P.; Zou, J.; Srour, S.; Shaffer, B.; Shapiro, R.M.; Varma, A.; McGuirk, J.; Dholaria, B.R.; McCurdy, S.R.; et al. ASTCT Consensus Recommendations on Testing and Treatment of Patients with Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies. Transplant. Cell. Ther. 2024, 30, 1139–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mulas, O.; Mola, B.; Caocci, G.; La Nasa, G. Conditioning Regimens in Patients with β-Thalassemia Who Underwent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Scoping Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zephir, H.; Puyade, M.; Gueguen, A.; Michel, L.; Terriou, L.; Dive, D.; Laureys, G.; Mathey, G.; Labauge, P.; Marjanovic, Z.; et al. Indications de l’autogreffe dans la sclérose en plaques: Recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC) en lien avec la Société francophone de la sclérose en plaques [Indications and follow-up for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) in association with the Francophone Society of Multiple Sclerosis]. Bull. Cancer 2019, 106, S92–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Patti, F.; Chisari, C.G.; Toscano, S.; Arena, S.; Finocchiaro, C.; Cimino, V.; Milone, G. Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Monocentric Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Zou, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Xin, X.; Tu, S.; Li, Y. Combination strategies to optimize the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in haematological malignancies. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 954235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  36. Ghobadi, A.; Foley, N.C.; Cohen, J.; Rettig, M.P.; Cashen, A.F.; Gehrs, L.; Christ, S.; Street, E.; Wallace, N.; Ritchey, J.; et al. Blinatumomab consolidation post-autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2024, 8, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Edinger, M.; Hoffmann, P.; Ermann, J.; Drago, K.; Fathman, C.G.; Strober, S.; Negrin, R.S. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells preserve graft-versus-tumor activity while inhibiting graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 1144–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Godefroy, E.; Chevallier, P.; Haspot, F.; Vignes, C.; Daguin, V.; Lambot, S.; Verdon, M.; De Seilhac, M.; Letailleur, V.; Jarry, A.; et al. Human gut microbiota-reactive DP8α Tregs prevent acute graft-versus-host disease in a CD73-dependent manner. JCI Insight. 2024, 9, e179458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  39. Yazdandoust, E.; Hajifathali, A.; Roshandel, E.; Zarif, M.N.; Pourfathollah, A.A.; Parkhideh, S.; Mehdizadeh, M.; Amini-Kafiabad, S. Gut microbiota intervention by pre and probiotics can induce regulatory T cells and reduce the risk of severe acute GVHD following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transpl. Immunol. 2023, 78, 101836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Milone, G.; Leotta, S.; Cupri, A. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Recent Advances. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3379. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103379

AMA Style

Milone G, Leotta S, Cupri A. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Recent Advances. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(10):3379. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103379

Chicago/Turabian Style

Milone, Giuseppe, Salvatore Leotta, and Alessandra Cupri. 2025. "Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Recent Advances" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 10: 3379. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103379

APA Style

Milone, G., Leotta, S., & Cupri, A. (2025). Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Recent Advances. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(10), 3379. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103379

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop