Next Article in Journal
Pleural Effusion in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Clinical and Prognostic Implications—An Observational, Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
ESKD Risk Prediction Model in a Multicenter Chronic Kidney Disease Cohort in China: A Derivation, Validation, and Comparison Study
Previous Article in Journal
Plasma Level of Pyrophosphate Is Low in Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum Owing to Mutations in the ABCC6 Gene, but It Does Not Correlate with ABCC6 Genotype
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association between Urolithiasis and History Proton Pump Inhibitor Medication: A Nested Case-Control Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Global, Regional, and National Incidence and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for Urolithiasis in 195 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA (People’ s Liberation Army) General Hospital, 69 Yongding Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 1048; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031048
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Epidemiology of Kidney Disease)

Abstract

:
Purpose: Urolithiasis is highly prevalent worldwide. The aim of this study was to report the results of the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study on urolithiasis burden estimates grouped by gender, regions, countries or territories, and sociodemographic index (SDI) from 1990 to 2019 globally. Methods: We reported detailed estimates and temporal trends of the burden estimates of urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019 in 195 countries and territories and further evaluated the relationship between these estimates and SDI, a composite indicator of income per person, years of education, and fertility as a measurement of country/region socio-economic level. Urolithiasis incidence and disability-adjusted life years by gender, regions, countries or territories, and SDI were reported. The percentage change and estimated annual percentage change of these burden estimates were calculated to quantify temporal trends. Results: From 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of urolithiasis decreased globally by 0.459% and 1.898% per year, respectively. Such a trend of ASIR was prominently due to the decline in the middle, high-middle, and high SDI countries, including Eastern Asia, high-income Eastern Europe, and high-income North America. During this period, these estimates increased in low and low-middle SDI countries, particularly in South Asia, Andean Latin America, and Western Europe. A decline in DALYs was observed in all SDI countries. An approximate positive linear association existed between the burden estimate’s decreased APC and SDI level, except at the high SDI level. Both males and females showed the same trend. Conclusions: This study provides comprehensive knowledge of the burden estimate of urolithiasis. Although the burden estimates of urolithiasis showed a global decrease during the past 29 years, this progress has yet to be universal; the increasing trends were observed in countries with low and low-middle SDI countries. Research in these countries is needed and helps with the appropriate allocation of health resources for prevention, screening, and treatment strategies.

1. Introduction

Urolithiasis is a highly prevalent disease worldwide with prevalence rates ranging from 1% to 20% [1], it is characterized by significant morbidity, economic costs and days lost from work [2]. In addition, about half of the stone formers have one lifetime recurrence [3]. High recurrence is observed in more than 10% of urolithiasis patients [4]. There is significant variation in rates based on geography, climate, diet style, ethnicity, gender, and age [5]. In countries such as Sweden, Canada or the United States, the prevalence of stones are notably high (more than 10%) [3,6,7]. However, in Asian countries, there was little epidemiologic data about urolithiasis. Yasui et al. [8] reported that the incidence of urolithiasis in Japan was 134.0 per 100,000 person/year, which was significantly lower than that reported in Western countries. Due to the high rates of new and recurrent stones, management of stones is expensive.
Understanding the epidemiology of urolithiasis measures among different regions/nations, and changing trends is crucial for treatment outcome. Furthermore, reliable and accurate statistics on patterns and disease trends in various geographic locations give policy makers the proof they need to allocate resources properly. However, few evaluations have been carried out at the national level, and there is no study addressing the trend in disease burden of urolithiasis. The majority of epidemiological studies of urolithiasis were based on general practice surveys, selected population surveys, or hospitals [9]. For understanding of a nation’s actual demographic status, they are insufficient. A historical evaluation and a comparison of different countries are also impossible. The global burden of disease (GBD) study evaluated the prevalence of urolithiasis in 195 nations and territories, offering a rare chance to comprehend the epidemiology of this condition. By combining several forms of data, it gives a thorough assessment of changes in disease health status. A cycle of continuous quality improvement of this database has additionally led to substantial changes, including new data sources, identification of novel causes of death, and updated methods, which serve as global information freely available for policy makers and public groups seeking to improve human health [10].
Although there were several studies addressing this issue based on GBD 2019 [11,12,13], they did not demonstrate the global disease burden of urolithiasis stratified by sex, countries and territories. Therefore, we have reported an in-depth examination of the global burden of urolithiasis from a complete time series of incidence from 1990 to 2019, with disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and investigated the disease burden to determine the temporal trends of these estimates at global, regional, and national levels. The relationships of estimates of the global burden of urolithiasis with socioeconomic development level, and measured SDI, were further assessed.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Sources

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) is a systematic, scientific effort to quantify the comparative magnitude of health loss due to diseases, injuries, and risk factors by age, sex, and geography over time. The conceptual and analytical framework for GBD 2019, with details of the hierarchy of causes and risk factors, data inputs and processing, and analytical methods, has been published elsewhere [14,15,16]. GBD Results Tool provides the details of different risk factors, causes and impairments related to health in terms of deaths, Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs), Years Lived with Disability (YLDs), Years of Life Lost (YLLs) and prevalence via age, year, gender, and location. Results from the GBD 2019 study, which evaluated 354 causes and 3484 sequelae, were obtained from 195 different nations [14]. These results were generated using a total of 68,781 data sources, including a thorough literature review, hospital and clinical data, surveillance and survey data from various sources, and inpatient and outpatient medical records [14,17]. In our study, data on urolithiasis incidence and DALYs and their uncertainty intervals were curated from GBD 2019 data sources (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool (accessed on 1 December 2021)) provided by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. The present study complies with the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) recommendations (Table S1).

2.2. Modeling

The major data inputs for the distribution of urolithiasis globally included national health surveys, population representative surveys and cohort studies, and a variety of published and unpublished studies which were described in the appendix (Supplementary Materials, Supplementary Tables S2–S6). In the GBD 2019, urolithiasis was defined as stone formation located anywhere along the genitourinary tract. Using DisMod-MR, version 2.1, a disease modeling computational tool that is the standard GBD modeling approach for non-fatal health outcomes, the incidence of urolithiasis was estimated by region, age, sex, and year (Figure S1). The identification of all accessible data sources, their evaluation for data extraction based on inclusion criteria, the determination of sequelae severity distributions, the incorporation of disability weights to quantify severity, and comorbidity adjustment of sequelae were all steps in the process of estimating the incidence of urolithiasis.
DALYs, a summary measure of total health loss, were calculated for urolithiasis by summing YLLs and YLDs for each location, age, sex, and year (Figure S1). YLD captures years lived with less-than-ideal health because of urolithiasis and was estimated by a multiplication of prevalent cases of urolithiasis and a disability weight [16,18]. YLL is a measure of the years lost owing to premature mortality due to urolithiasis and was based on the remaining life expectancy compared with a reference standard life table at age of death [16].

2.3. The Socio-Demographic Index

The Socio-demographic Index (SDI) is a summary measure that estimates a location’s position on a spectrum of development [19]. Briefly, the SDI was computed on the basis of the geometric mean of three indicators: lag-distributed income per capita, educational attainment over the age of 15 years, and total fertility rate in women aged 15–49 years. SDI scores were scaled from 0 to 1, and each location was assigned an SDI score for each year. A total of five SDI quintiles, high, high-middle, middle, low-middle, and low, were selected based on SDI values (Table S7). Average relationships between SDI and incidence and DALYs of urolithiasis were estimated using spline regressions, which were then used to estimate expected values at each level of SDI. The results presented for SDI quintiles in this study reflect each country’s position based on its SDI values in 2019.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

To measure the trend in the global burden of urolithiasis, we utilized the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR), DALYs, percentage change (PC), and estimated annual percentage change (APC) [20]. When comparing populations with varied age structures or for the same population across time when the age profiles change proportionally, standardization is required. By adding the products of the age-specific rates and the number of people in the same age subgroup of the chosen reference standard population, and then dividing the total by the standard population weights, the age-standardized rates according to the direct approach were determined. The GBD world population standard was used for calculation of age-standardized rates. APC is a widely used measure of the ASR trend over a specific time interval. A regression line was fitted to the natural logarithm of the rates. APC and 95% confidential interval (CI) values can also be obtained from the linear regression model [21]. We employed a generalized additive model with Loess smoother on SDI to estimate the associations between SDI and ASIR and DALYs using GBD estimates from all national locations across the years from 1990 to 2019 [22]. Uncertainty intervals (UI) were defined as the 2.5th and 97.5th values of the ordered draws. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (Version 23, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and the R program (Version 3.4.4, R core team, Vienna, Austria), with p-Values <.001 considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Age Standardized Incidence Rate (ASIR) of Urolithiasis

Globally, ASIR of urolithiasis changed from 1146.048 per 100,000 individuals in 1990 to 1031.497 per 100,000 individuals in 2019, representing a shift of −0.459% per year (95%CI: −0.506%–−0.411%) and −9.995% in total. Both male and female showed a decrease in ASIR of urolithiasis, which were −0.557% and −0.312% per year, respectively (Table 1).
There was a decreasing trend observed in 12 of 21 regions. The largest decrease in APC was observed in Eastern Asia (−1.396%), followed by high-income Eastern Europe (−0.317%) and high-income North America (−0.305%), which collectively contributed to 73.130% of the decreasing trend. Conversely, an increasing trend, was observed in another 9 regions. The largest increase in APC was detected in South Asia (0.568%), followed by Andean Latin America (0.381%) and Western Europe (0.261%). These three regions contributed 58.815% of the overall increasing trend. (Figure 1 and Table 2).
Between 1990 and 2019, APC of ASIR decreased in 53 of the 195 countries, among which statistical significance was reached in 38 countries (71.70%). The top three were China (−1.492%), Indonesia (−0.900%), and New Zealand (−0.673%). Almost three-fourths of the countries or territories (142/195) displayed an increasing trend during the observational period, the majority with statistical significance (89.29%). Territories of Taiwan (a part of China) showed the most pronounced increase with an average of 1.208% per year, followed by Ecuador (APC = 1.006%) and Belgium (APC = 0.891%) (Figure 2 and Table 3).
When stratified by SDI quintiles, ASIR of urolithiasis increased in countries/regions at low and low-middle SDI quintiles but decreased in those at middle, high-middle and high SDI quintiles. There was an approximate positive linear association that existed between the decrease in APC and SDI except at high SDI levels. Both male and female demonstrated the same results. High-middle SDI (APC, −1.165%) and low SDI quintiles (APC, 0.335%) contributed most significantly to the decreasing and increasing trends, respectively (Table 4).

3.2. Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) of Urolithiasis

Globally, age-standardized DALYs of urolithiasis decreased by 35.862% from 9.427 per 100,000 individuals in 1990 to 6.046 per 100,000 individuals in 2019, with −1.898% per year (95%CI: −2.117–1.679%). Both male and female showed a decrease in age-standardized DALYs of urolithiasis, which were −1.812% and −2.078% per year, respectively (Table 1).
There was a decreasing trend observed in 12 of 21 regions. The largest decrease in APC was observed in Eastern Asia (−4.678%), followed by Central Europe (−2.776%) and Eastern Europe (−1.768%), which collectively contributed to 53.12% of the decreasing trend. Conversely, an increasing trend, was observed in another 9 regions. The largest increase in APC was detected in Tropical Latin America (3.248%), followed by the Caribbean (1.133%) and high-income Asia Pacific (0.670%). These three regions contributed 61.525% of the overall increasing trend (Figure 3 and Table 5).
Between 1990 and 2019, APC of DALYs decreased in 122 of the 195 countries, among which statistical significance was reached in 101 countries (82.79%). The top three were Bulgaria (−6.073%), American Samoa (−4.974%), and China (−4.811%). Almost one-third of the countries or territories (73/195) displayed an increasing trend during the observational period, the majority with statistical significance (72.60%). Brazil showed the most pronounced increase with an average of 3.279% per year, followed by Trinidad and Tobago (APC = 3.217%) and Armenia (APC = 0.1.995%) (Figure 4 and Table 6).
The associations between global burden estimates of urolithiasis and SDI levels for each of the 21 GBD regions for all individual years between 1990 and 2019 are illustrated in Figure 3 and Table 7. In general, a decreasing trend was observed at all SDI levels, and there was an approximate positive linear association that existed between the decrease in APC and SDI except at the high SDI levels. High-middle SDI (APC, −3.096%) contributed most significantly to the decreasing trends. Both male and female demonstrated a similar demographic pattern.

4. Discussion

Based on the GBD 2019 data, we comprehensively assessed the recent burden estimates as well as temporal trends in urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019 at the global, regional, and national levels. During the study period, the global urolithiasis burden decreased as measured by ASIR and DALYs. However, the temporal trends of these burden estimates varied considerably by SDI levels and regions. The ASIR decrease in urolithiasis was observed in the middle, high middle, and high SDI countries, but an increase was shown in low and low middle SDI countries. A decline in DALYs was observed in all SDI levels. Additionally, an approximate positive linear association existed between the decreased APC of burden estimates and SDI, except for at the high SDI levels.
This study showed a slight decline in the incidence of urolithiasis globally for both genders, consistent with several previous evaluations of regional trends in urolithiasis. A recent population-based study from Rochester showed the incidence rates might have decreased in males and reached a plateau in females since 1990 [23]. This study reported relatively stable incidence rates from 1970 to 2000 and a downward trend in the overall incidence of kidney stones in the Caucasian population [23]. Numerous previous data reported that urolithiasis prevalence in most countries has been rising in recent decades [3,7,8,24,25], such as the United States, New Zealand, Germany, and Japan. While the incidence trend was slightly decreased or stable, it implies that new urolithiasis cases increased more slowly.
Although the consequences are not life-threatening in most stone patients, it is a significant cause of morbidity, hospitalization, and days lost from work [26]. There has been a significant decrease in the DALYs of urolithiasis globally, and it decreased linearly with SDI except for high SDI countries. From 1990 to 2019, Global DALYs of urolithiasis, with 122 of 195 countries or territories, had improved. Over the last three decades, this decreasing pattern in the age-standardized DALY rate of urolithiasis may be partly attributable to surgical innovations and better treatment guidelines [27]. These advances have made interventions safe, effective, and associated with shorter recovery duration and lesser discomfort [28].
There is significant geographic variation in urolithiasis incidence worldwide. Even though throughout a country, the incidence may have a drastic range [5]. The variation in demography is impacted by many factors, such as climate, ethnicity, environmental factors, availability of medical practice, dietary styles, and age distribution; these factors interact in complex ways. This study observed a decreasing trend in 12 of 21 regions. The most significant decrease in APC was observed in Eastern Asia, followed by high-income Eastern Europe and high-income North America, collectively contributing to 73.130% of the decreasing trend. In addition, the APC of ASIR decreased in 53 of the 195 countries; the top three were China, Indonesia, and New Zealand. This decreasing trend has been influenced by some regions, particularly in populous East Asia. For example, as the most populous country in the world, China has experienced a remarkable decline. In the last decades, the diet structure of China has greatly changed, and the consumption of fruits and vegetables is on the rise, which are protective factors for urolithiasis development [29]. This could partially help to explain the decreasing trend.
However, an increasing trend was observed in the other nine regions. The most significant increase in APC was detected in South Asia, followed by Andean Latin America and Western Europe. These three regions contributed 58.815% of the overall increasing trend. In addition, between 1990 and 2019, almost three-fourths of the countries or territories displayed a rising trend during the observational period, the majority with statistical significance. The territories of Taiwan (a part of China) showed the most pronounced increase, followed by Ecuador and Belgium. The progress in diagnostic procedures, such as sonography, has led to a significant improvement in early diagnosis of asymptomatic urolithiasis, which may increase the trend in low and low-middle SDI nations [30]. Significant changes in nutritional and environmental factors might also lead to progress in the burden of urolithiasis [30].
While most countries in the low and low-middle SDI quintiles showed an increase in ASIR, these values declined in the middle, high-middle, and high SDI quintile countries. Between-country variations in factors, such as socioeconomic status (per-capita income, fertility, and education levels), access to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment facilities, and differences in clinical practice, could further lead to heterogeneity in these burden estimates. Socioeconomic status (SES) differences in health outcomes are among the most consistent epidemiological findings [31]. An earlier ecological study also reported an association of diversity of income and education levels with incidence and mortality differences of disease in each region [32], patients with higher SES levels might have less unhealthy living behavior than lower SES patients [32]. Furthermore, compared to countries with low income, high-income countries have more advocacy, media attention, and funding for the prevention and treatment of disease [33]. Therefore, to further reduce the disease burden, more regions, especially countries with low or middle SDI, should consider increasing the investment in health careers [34]. Changes in socioeconomic conditions over time, and the subsequent changes in dietary styles, have affected not only the incidence rate but also the location and composition of stones [2]. In addition, the observed variation in urolithiasis estimated burden among the SDI quintiles levels was not only due to differences in socioeconomic status but also to differences in genetic background, lifestyles, and exposure to environmental and nutritional factors.
In addition, due to global warming from climate change, it is expected that the prevalence of kidney stone disease will increase due to more significant insensible water losses, resulting in more concentrated urine and altered urinary flow. In line with this, Kaufman et al. found that an increased burden of kidney stone disease on healthcare systems attributed to climate warming is very likely [35]. Especially the burden of greenhouse gas emissions was more prominently observed in low-income countries [36], which may be another plausible reason for explaining the disease burden trend discrepancy between various income levels of regions and countries.
The Asian–Africa stone-forming belt includes the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Myanmar, India, Pakistan, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Sudan. In this area, urolithiasis was detected in all age groups, with prevalence ranging from 4% to 20% [37]. The higher prevalence in these stone-forming belt countries is possibly determined by the high consanguinity among ethnic groups [38]. In the current study, we found that this stone belt still exists. However, the estimated burden of a few countries declined, and the decreased trend was significant in Indonesia, Thailand, and Sudan.
There were several limitations of the study. First, GBD estimates are a combination of data and largely depend on the quality and quantity of data used in the modeling [10]. The health surveys and other data systems in different countries result in wide uncertainty in these estimates. Several statistical procedures have been developed to address this flaw, including modeling based on regional patterns and disease-specific covariates [39]. Furthermore, differences in data collection practices and coding systems and the quality of data sources remain major challenges. However, the GBD 2019 study has made a substantial effort to solve these difficulties in the methodological framework, including applying corrections for under-registration and garbage code redistribution algorithms [40]. Secondly, given the misclassification of urolithiasis and the adoption of different disease coding systems in the input data sources, we failed to estimate temporal trends in the burden of urolithiasis stratified by stone location and composition. Thirdly, SDI utility is restricted in countries with income inequality. The applicability of SDI could therefore be enhanced by taking into account social heterogeneity within countries [41]. However, data from GBD is the most thorough and standardized when compared to other sources because it provides complete time series and outcomes at the country level. This is useful for policymakers who need to effectively distribute the limited resources in their healthcare systems.

5. Conclusions

Since urolithiasis is a common disease worldwide, elucidating the trends and burden estimates over time is essential to establish policies and accurately set priorities for action. The GBD 2019 study provides an opportunity to assess the latest evidence, and monitor these trends to determine where interventions exert an effect. Our findings collectively indicate that while progress has been made in reducing the global burden of urolithiasis in the middle, high-middle, and high-SDI countries, more effective prevention strategies are required for low and low-middle SDI countries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm12031048/s1, Figure S1: Flowchart, urolithiasis incidence to DALY estimation; Table S1: GATHER checklist; Table S2: The geographical coverage of urolithiasis data by measure in GBD 2019; Table S3: Covariates selected for CODEm for urolithiasis and expected direction of covariate; Table S4: Total number of site years by cause and source type for GBD 2019; Table S5: Results for CODEm model testing; Table S6: Comparison of GBD 2016 and GBD 2019 covariates used and level of covariates; Table S7: Socio-Demographic Index groupings by location, based on 2019 values. References [42,43,44,45,46] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

G.Y. had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. G.Y.: Protocol/project development; J.L., Y.Z., Z.X. and G.Y.: Data collection or management; J.L., Y.Z., Z.X. and G.Y.: Data analysis; J.L., Y.Z., Z.X. and G.Y.: Manuscript writing/editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent from all eligible patients was obtained.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the Global Health Data Exchange query tool (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool (accessed on 1 December 2021)).

Acknowledgments

We give special thanks to all the colleagues at the Department of Urology of the Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital for their help and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trinchieri, A.; Curhan, G.; Karlsen, S.; Jun, W.K. Epidemiology. In Stone Disease; Segura, J., Conort, P., Khoury, S., Eds.; ICUD: Paris, France, 2003; Distributed by Editions 21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Croppi, E.; Ferraro, P.M.; Taddei, L.; Gambaro, G.; GEA Firenze Study Group. Prevalence of renal stones in an Italian urban population: A general practice-based study. Urol. Res. 2012, 40, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hesse, A.; Brändle, E.; Wilbert, D.; Köhrmann, K.-U.; Alken, P. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur. Urol. 2003, 44, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Keoghane, S.; Walmsley, B.; Hodgson, D. The natural history of untreated renal tract calculi. BJU Int. 2010, 105, 1627–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sorokin, I.; Mamoulakis, C.; Miyazawa, K.; Rodgers, A.; Talati, J.; Lotan, Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J. Urol. 2017, 35, 1301–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sanchez-Martin, F.M.; Martínez-Rodríguez, R. Incidence and prevalence of published studies about urolithiasis in Spain. A review. Actas Urol. Esp. 2007, 31, 511–520. [Google Scholar]
  7. Stamatelou, K.K.; Francis, M.E.; Jones, C.A.; Nyberg, L.M., Jr.; Curhan, G.C. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003, 63, 1817–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yasui, T.; Iguchi, M.; Suzuki, S.; Kohri, K. Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan: National trends between 1965 and 2005. Urology 2008, 71, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boyce, W.H.; Garvey, F.K.; Strawcutter, H.E. Incidence of urinary calculi among patients in general hospitals, 1948 to 1952. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1956, 161, 1437–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roth, G.A.; Abate, D.; Abate, K.H.; Abay, S.M.; Abbafati, C.; Abbasi, N.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdela, J.; Abdelalim, A.; et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1736–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Qian, X.; Wan, J.; Xu, J.; Liu, C.; Zhong, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S. Epidemiological Trends of Urolithiasis at the Global, Regional, and National Levels: A Population-Based Study. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2022, 2022, 6807203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, S.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.; Yue, S.; Hou, X.; Hu, L.; Wu, J. Trends in the Incidence and DALYs of Urolithiasis From 1990 to 2019: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 825541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lang, J.; Narendrula, A.; El-Zawahry, A.; Sindhwani, P.; Ekwenna, O. Global Trends in Incidence and Burden of Urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis of Global Burden of Disease Study Data. Eur. Urol. Open Sci. 2022, 35, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. James, S.L.; Abate, D.; Abate, K.H.; Abay, S.M.; Abbafati, C.; Abbasi, N.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdela, J.; Abdelalim, A.; et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1789–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Stanaway, J.D.; Afshin, A.; Gakidou, E.; Lim, S.S.; Abate, D.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbasi, N.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1923–1994. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kyu, H.H.; Abate, D.; Abate, K.H.; Abay, S.M.; Abbafati, C.; Abbasi, N.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdela, J.; Abdelalim, A.; et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1859–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hassan, B.; Ahmed, R.; Li, B.; Noor, A.; Hassan, Z.U. A comprehensive study capturing vision loss burden in Pakistan (1990–2025): Findings from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mokdad, A.H.; Ballestros, K.; Echko, M.; Glenn, S.; Olsen, H.E.; Mullany, E.; Lee, A.; Khan, A.R.; Ahmadi, A.; Ferrari, A.J.; et al. The State of US Health, 1990–2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States. JAMA 2018, 319, 1444–1472. [Google Scholar]
  19. McKee, S. Rethinking Development and Health: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study; Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation: Seattle, WA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hankey, B.F.; Ries, L.A.; Kosary, C.L.; Feuer, E.J.; Merrill, R.M.; Clegg, L.X.; Edwards, B.K. Partitioning linear trends in age-adjusted rates. Cancer Causes Control 2000, 11, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Yuan, H.; Fang, Q.; Cai, N.; Suo, C.; Jin, L.; Zhang, T.; Chen, X. The trends in incidence of primary liver cancer caused by specific etiologies: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 and implications for liver cancer prevention. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feigin, V.L.; Nichols, E.; Alam, T.; Bannick, M.S.; Beghi, E.; Blake, N.; Culpepper, W.J.; Dorsey, E.R.; Elbaz, A.; Ellenbogen, R.G.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 459–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lieske, J.C.; De La Vega, L.S.P.; Slezak, J.M.; Bergstralh, E.J.; Leibson, C.L.; Ho, K.L.; Gettman, M.T. Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: An update. Kidney Int. 2006, 69, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Du, J.; Johnston, R.; Rice, M. Temporal trends of acute nephrolithiasis in Auckland, New Zealand. N. Z. Med. J. 2009, 122, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Trinchieri, A.; Coppi, F.; Montanari, E.; Del Nero, A.; Zanetti, G.; Pisani, E. Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upper urinary tract stones during the last ten years. Eur. Urol. 2000, 37, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shuster, J.; Scheaffer, R.L. Economic impact of kidney stones in white male adults. Urology 1984, 24, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Türk, C.; Petřík, A.; Sarica, K.; Seitz, C.; Skolarikos, A.; Straub, M.; Knoll, T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur. Urol. 2016, 69, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Türk, C.; Petřík, A.; Sarica, K.; Seitz, C.; Skolarikos, A.; Straub, M.; Knoll, T. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur. Urol. 2016, 69, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiao, Y.; Su, C.; Ouyang, Y.; Zhang, B. Trends of vegetables and fruits consumption among Chinese adults aged 18 to 44 years old from 1991 to 2011. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2015, 36, 232–236. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liao, B.; Luo, D.; Wang, K.; Li, H.; Zeng, G. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian J. Urol. 2018, 5, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Krieger, N.; Williams, D.R.; Moss, N.E. Measuring social class in US public health research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu. Rev. Public Health 1997, 18, 341–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Razi, S.; Ghoncheh, M.; Mohammadian-Hafshejani, A.; Aziznejhad, H.; Mohammadian, M.; Salehiniya, H. The Incidence and Mortality of Ovarian Cancer and Their Relationship. Ecancermedicalscience 2016, 10, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Weiderpass, E.; Oh, J.-K.; Algeri, S.; Bellocco, R. Socioeconomic status and epithelial ovarian cancer survival in Sweden. Cancer Causes Control 2014, 25, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ginsburg, O.; Bray, F.; Coleman, M.P.; Vanderpuye, V.; Eniu, A.; Kotha, S.R.; Sarker, M.; Huong, T.T.; Allemani, C.; Dvaladze, A.; et al. The global burden of women’s cancers: A grand challenge in global health. Lancet 2017, 389, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kaufman, J.; Vicedo-Cabrera, A.M.; Tam, V.; Song, L.; Coffel, E.; Tasian, G. The impact of heat on kidney stone presentations in South Carolina under two climate change scenarios. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khan, M.M.H.; Havukainen, J.; Horttanainen, M. Impact of utilizing solid recovered fuel on the global warming potential of cement production and waste management system: A life cycle assessment approach. Waste Manag. Res. 2021, 39, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Llanos, A.; Warner, W.A.; Luciani, S.; Lee, T.Y.; Bajracharya, S.; Slovacek, S.; Roach, V.; Lamont-Greene, M. Gynecologic cancer mortality in Trinidad and Tobago and comparisons of mortality-to-incidence rate ratios across global regions. Cancer Causes Control 2017, 28, 1251–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Robertson, W.G. Renal stones in the tropics. Semin. Nephrol. 2003, 23, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ali, S.H.; Rifat, U.N. Etiological and clinical patterns of childhood urolithiasis in Iraq. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2005, 20, 1453–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fitzmaurice, C.; Abate, D.; Abbasi, N.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdel-Rahman, O.; Abdelalim, A.; Abdoli, A.; Abdollahpour, I.; Abdulle, A.S.M.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived with Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 1553–1568. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ahern, R.M.; Lozano, R.; Naghavi, M.; Foreman, K.; Gakidou, E.; Murray, C.J. Improving the public health utility of global cardiovascular mortality data: The rise of ischemic heart disease. Popul. Health Metr. 2011, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Data Input Sources Tool; Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation: Seattle, WA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2019/data-input-sources (accessed on 1 December 2022).
  43. Das Gupta, P. Standardization and Decomposition of Rates: A User’s Manual; U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 19–36. [Google Scholar]
  44. Das Gupta, P. Standardization and Decomposition of Rates from Cross-Classified Data. Genus 1994, 50, 171–196. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Chevan, A.; Sutherland, M. Revisiting Das Gupta: Refinement and extension of standardization and decomposition. Demography 2009, 46, 429–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bowe, B.; Xie, Y.; Li, T.; Xian, H.; Al-Aly, Z. Particulate Matter Air Pollution and the Risk of Incident CKD and Progression to ESRD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018, 29, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 21 regions. (A) APC of ASIR stratified by SDI levels of both gender; (B) APC of ASIR stratified by SDI levels of male; (C) APC of ASIR stratified by SDI levels of female.
Figure 1. Annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 21 regions. (A) APC of ASIR stratified by SDI levels of both gender; (B) APC of ASIR stratified by SDI levels of male; (C) APC of ASIR stratified by SDI levels of female.
Jcm 12 01048 g001
Figure 2. Percentage change and annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 195 Countries and territories. (A) PC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of both gender; (B) APC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of both gender; (C) PC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of male. (D) APC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of male; (E) PC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of female; (F) APC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of female.
Figure 2. Percentage change and annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 195 Countries and territories. (A) PC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of both gender; (B) APC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of both gender; (C) PC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of male. (D) APC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of male; (E) PC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of female; (F) APC of ASIR stratified 195 Countries and territories of female.
Jcm 12 01048 g002
Figure 3. Annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 21 regions. (A) APC of DALYs stratified by SDI levels of both gender; (B) APC of DALYs stratified by SDI levels of male. (C) APC of DALYs stratified by SDI levels of female.
Figure 3. Annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 21 regions. (A) APC of DALYs stratified by SDI levels of both gender; (B) APC of DALYs stratified by SDI levels of male. (C) APC of DALYs stratified by SDI levels of female.
Jcm 12 01048 g003
Figure 4. Percentage change and annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 195 Countries and territories. (A) PC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of both gender; (B) APC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of both gender; (C) PC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of male; (D) APC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of male; (E) PC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of female; (F) APC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of female.
Figure 4. Percentage change and annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 195 Countries and territories. (A) PC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of both gender; (B) APC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of both gender; (C) PC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of male; (D) APC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of male; (E) PC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of female; (F) APC of DALYs stratified 195 Countries and territories of female.
Jcm 12 01048 g004
Table 1. The global age standardized incidence rate and disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019 stratified by gender.
Table 1. The global age standardized incidence rate and disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019 stratified by gender.
ASIRDALYs
YearBoth Male and FemaleMaleFemaleBoth Male and FemaleMaleFemale
19901146.0476411440.793066875.81148579.42700125511.188637737.973054209
19911140.9112181436.61929868.50978499.3906147711.162706897.922430885
19921135.7622331431.9645861.71921019.3665805211.095855617.930221913
19931130.1914621426.5021855.02698929.29974519210.995293617.881904971
19941124.6452751420.736097848.9014349.05348531510.732586337.638401684
19951119.4365541415.011279843.65542328.69209224710.345416617.285534651
19961113.8592531408.393382838.74900178.2828384349.8691893746.923735513
19971107.691471400.543025833.9314498.0059279949.6255293216.606542967
19981101.1556281392.024039829.10176867.7578491869.3239766266.39918849
19991095.0414471383.898419824.76635537.6037039499.14402016.264852915
20001090.0209061377.162259821.26829177.4425990329.0127319936.06963117
20011086.0139631371.772109818.47719547.2510612018.8592523565.842025802
20021082.6279381367.045562816.25129637.0817996478.6985388365.660230101
20031079.4221371362.43179814.27207696.9121262558.5407299825.476002512
20041076.4081711357.917612812.57744356.7591823218.3780387795.326008996
20051073.3995591353.298749811.01040476.6406807048.234882175.222382904
20061065.9852071341.19763808.13310636.4496636978.0056669555.061498996
20071052.9130511319.364923803.66586216.3033754557.8106082224.956258738
20081038.2407311294.641594798.91027256.2332674817.7044166744.917888338
20091026.3203371274.275091795.30649526.1246499777.5312188574.867998357
20101021.5611361265.710553794.32829726.0793124897.4337864394.868709668
20111021.9316621265.637737795.14692976.0094754537.3259088624.830072279
20121022.7981591266.314351796.21513295.9792768477.2703610074.819140076
20131024.0036671267.443282797.50201035.982197697.2383291774.851921944
20141025.4948091268.944095798.93001146.0274586817.2594503184.917627711
20151027.2787211270.930727800.470746.096575887.3172484554.995490077
20161029.2512881273.264415802.04853356.1139281357.3315951535.015602337
20171029.3424881274.353335802.12643346.1248176457.3306053335.014520307
20181030.3661881275.154675803.43261216.1634311497.2867511884.953148863
20191031.4971871276.066795803.76090316.0462720997.2677620284.946559974
Abbreviations: Age standardized Incidence rate, ASIR; Disability adjusted life years, DALYs.
Table 2. Percentage change and annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 21 regions.
Table 2. Percentage change and annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 21 regions.
Both Male and FemaleMaleFemale
PCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-Value
Central Asia−1.065 −0.006 −0.063 0.050 0.818 −1.530 −0.010 −0.080 0.060 0.772 −2.341 −0.076 −0.127 −0.025 0.005
Eastern Asia−24.330 −1.396 −1.653 −1.138 <0.001 −24.363 −1.402 −1.675 −1.130 <0.001 −23.715 −1.335 −1.557 −1.114 <0.001
High-income Asia Pacific−0.485 −0.062 −0.091 −0.033 <0.001 −0.854 −0.066 −0.087 −0.045 <0.001 −2.032 −0.130 −0.171 −0.088 <0.001
South Asia13.301 0.568 0.481 0.656 <0.001 13.904 0.564 0.490 0.638 <0.001 14.777 0.660 0.550 0.770 <0.001
Southeast Asia−4.006 −0.253 −0.329 −0.177 <0.001 −5.788 −0.336 −0.413 −0.259 <0.001 −0.610 −0.099 −0.173 −0.026 0.010
Central Europe−6.216 −0.196 −0.229 −0.162 <0.001 −7.562 −0.237 −0.263 −0.210 <0.001 −5.417 −0.182 −0.226 −0.137 <0.001
Eastern Europe−7.412 −0.317 −0.434 −0.200 <0.001 −7.647 −0.336 −0.454 −0.217 <0.001 −9.720 −0.393 −0.529 −0.257 <0.001
Western Europe4.148 0.262 0.219 0.304 <0.001 2.298 0.188 0.148 0.229 <0.001 3.852 0.263 0.212 0.314 <0.001
Andean Latin America7.773 0.382 0.340 0.424 <0.001 6.184 0.317 0.275 0.358 <0.001 9.655 0.456 0.411 0.501 <0.001
Central Latin America−1.064 −0.029 −0.074 0.017 0.205 −0.919 −0.038 −0.096 0.020 0.193 −0.571 0.011 −0.019 0.041 0.464
Southern Latin America0.496 −0.032 −0.052 −0.013 0.002 0.874 −0.016 −0.035 0.003 0.098 0.102 −0.051 −0.073 −0.028 <0.001
Tropical Latin America−2.436 −0.084 −0.142 −0.025 0.007 −4.542 −0.285 −0.368 −0.202 <0.001 0.489 0.157 0.094 0.221 <0.001
High-income North America−5.087 −0.305 −0.491 −0.120 0.002 −6.431 −0.572 −0.779 −0.365 <0.001 −5.464 0.001 −0.207 0.209 0.992
Central Sub-Saharan Africa4.118 0.194 0.154 0.234 <0.001 4.962 0.225 0.179 0.270 <0.001 3.656 0.169 0.140 0.197 <0.001
Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa2.022 0.094 0.042 0.146 0.001 2.130 0.097 0.039 0.155 0.002 2.891 0.136 0.088 0.184 <0.001
Southern Sub-Saharan Africa2.884 0.127 0.109 0.144 <0.001 3.415 0.135 0.129 0.141 <0.001 2.876 0.135 0.116 0.154 <0.001
Western Sub-Saharan Africa1.653 0.078 0.055 0.101 <0.001 2.655 0.111 0.080 0.142 <0.001 2.451 0.124 0.095 0.154 <0.001
North Africa and Middle East3.135 0.140 0.110 0.169 <0.001 3.475 0.163 0.136 0.191 <0.001 1.180 0.037 0.007 0.067 0.016
Oceania−0.158 −0.013 −0.041 0.015 0.363 1.933 0.070 0.039 0.101 <0.001 −3.025 −0.143 −0.166 −0.120 <0.001
Australasia−3.774 −0.067 −0.136 0.001 0.054 −5.276 −0.127 −0.200 −0.054 0.001 −3.053 −0.035 −0.106 0.036 0.315
Caribbean5.131 0.216 0.197 0.235 <0.001 6.675 0.268 0.248 0.288 <0.001 4.064 0.176 0.158 0.195 <0.001
Abbreviations: PC: percentage change; APC: annual percentage change. p < 0.001 considered significant.
Table 3. Percentage change and annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 195 Countries and territories.
Table 3. Percentage change and annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 195 Countries and territories.
Both Male and FemaleMaleFemale
NumberCountries and TerritoriesPCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-Value
1Afghanistan2.105 0.106 0.078 0.134 <0.001 2.540 0.116 0.092 0.140 <0.001 2.374 0.094 0.075 0.114 <0.001
2Albania1.031 0.057 0.034 0.080 <0.001 0.925 0.066 0.034 0.098 <0.001 2.053 0.079 0.064 0.093 <0.001
3Algeria2.295 0.098 0.087 0.108 <0.001 1.942 0.089 0.077 0.102 <0.001 2.043 0.077 0.068 0.086 <0.001
4American Samoa−10.603 −0.520 −0.573 −0.466 <0.001 −8.667 −0.430 −0.484 −0.376 <0.001 −11.115 −0.548 −0.590 −0.506 <0.001
5Andorra0.186 −0.037 −0.052 −0.022 <0.001 0.859 0.006 −0.012 0.024 0.491 2.008 0.047 0.035 0.060 <0.001
6Angola2.561 0.131 0.105 0.158 <0.001 4.465 0.200 0.173 0.227 <0.001 3.386 0.162 0.136 0.188 <0.001
7Antigua and Barbuda6.458 0.244 0.232 0.256 <0.001 5.941 0.226 0.213 0.238 <0.001 5.040 0.195 0.189 0.202 <0.001
8Argentina2.269 0.087 0.073 0.101 <0.001 2.539 0.097 0.085 0.109 <0.001 2.059 0.077 0.064 0.090 <0.001
9Armenia−5.537 −0.208 −0.280 −0.136 <0.001 −4.310 −0.145 −0.218 −0.071 <0.001 −7.671 −0.332 −0.393 −0.272 <0.001
10Australia−0.339 0.028 −0.009 0.064 0.129 −2.071 −0.035 −0.083 0.012 0.140 0.518 0.059 0.032 0.087 <0.001
11Austria6.372 0.277 0.012 0.541 0.041 7.061 0.295 −0.080 0.671 0.118 −0.339 −0.002 −0.080 0.076 0.954
12Azerbaijan5.502 0.280 0.207 0.352 <0.001 4.577 0.254 0.148 0.360 <0.001 3.702 0.200 0.144 0.257 <0.001
13Bahrain3.254 0.175 0.154 0.196 <0.001 2.001 0.090 0.083 0.096 <0.001 1.285 0.038 0.033 0.042 <0.001
14Bangladesh8.883 0.327 0.296 0.359 <0.001 11.902 0.436 0.390 0.483 <0.001 6.904 0.267 0.235 0.299 <0.001
15Barbados2.702 0.140 0.126 0.154 <0.001 0.566 0.083 0.050 0.116 <0.001 2.920 0.134 0.117 0.151 <0.001
16Belarus5.666 0.227 0.128 0.326 <0.001 7.651 0.299 0.199 0.399 <0.001 2.929 0.145 0.031 0.258 0.014
17Belgium17.111 0.891 0.628 1.155 <0.001 17.327 0.912 0.626 1.198 <0.001 13.416 0.731 0.515 0.947 <0.001
18Belize6.754 0.249 0.243 0.254 <0.001 7.918 0.285 0.275 0.294 <0.001 4.740 0.179 0.158 0.200 <0.001
19Benin2.202 0.097 0.070 0.123 <0.001 1.602 0.060 0.042 0.079 <0.001 2.936 0.139 0.110 0.167 <0.001
20Bermuda3.960 0.179 0.165 0.193 <0.001 5.262 0.216 0.201 0.231 <0.001 1.910 0.104 0.087 0.121 <0.001
21Bhutan8.416 0.309 0.287 0.331 <0.001 8.959 0.342 0.311 0.372 <0.001 6.192 0.235 0.216 0.254 <0.001
22Bolivia2.084 0.098 0.084 0.112 <0.001 1.169 0.069 0.053 0.084 <0.001 2.885 0.128 0.114 0.141 <0.001
23Bosnia and Herzegovina4.153 0.165 0.154 0.176 <0.001 4.099 0.174 0.161 0.188 <0.001 3.308 0.126 0.119 0.133 <0.001
24Botswana3.260 0.133 0.107 0.159 <0.001 3.197 0.126 0.104 0.148 <0.001 2.787 0.120 0.100 0.140 <0.001
25Brazil−2.582 −0.089 −0.149 −0.029 0.005 −4.772 −0.298 −0.383 −0.212 <0.001 0.438 0.159 0.094 0.224 <0.001
26Brunei−3.843 −0.153 −0.175 −0.131 <0.001 −4.072 −0.174 −0.183 −0.165 <0.001 1.050 0.047 0.038 0.056 <0.001
27Bulgaria−15.062 −0.616 −0.754 −0.478 <0.001 −16.907 −0.715 −0.859 −0.570 <0.001 −12.332 −0.488 −0.610 −0.366 <0.001
28Burkina Faso1.022 0.050 0.038 0.062 <0.001 0.922 0.041 0.026 0.055 <0.001 1.711 0.089 0.070 0.109 <0.001
29Burundi3.680 0.139 0.085 0.192 <0.001 0.447 0.005 −0.058 0.068 0.873 2.964 0.125 0.078 0.171 <0.001
30Cambodia5.173 0.211 0.165 0.256 <0.001 4.426 0.189 0.135 0.243 <0.001 4.206 0.161 0.132 0.190 <0.001
31Cameroon1.129 0.060 0.037 0.083 <0.001 1.012 0.045 0.027 0.063 <0.001 1.037 0.066 0.036 0.097 <0.001
32Canada2.296 0.105 0.097 0.114 <0.001 1.780 0.091 0.082 0.099 <0.001 1.498 0.068 0.057 0.079 <0.001
33Cape Verde4.380 0.183 0.152 0.214 <0.001 3.366 0.149 0.118 0.180 <0.001 2.315 0.106 0.083 0.129 <0.001
34Central African Republic4.741 0.199 0.167 0.231 <0.001 5.124 0.204 0.171 0.236 <0.001 3.754 0.166 0.136 0.195 <0.001
35Chad4.400 0.183 0.156 0.210 <0.001 2.836 0.111 0.085 0.138 <0.001 3.213 0.151 0.119 0.183 <0.001
36Chile−4.029 −0.326 −0.383 −0.269 <0.001 −3.394 −0.291 −0.347 −0.236 <0.001 −4.931 −0.373 −0.436 −0.310 <0.001
37China−26.411 −1.492 −1.764 −1.220 <0.001 −26.565 −1.500 −1.787 −1.213 <0.001 −25.503 −1.424 −1.656 −1.191 <0.001
38Colombia3.242 0.123 0.100 0.146 <0.001 3.749 0.144 0.122 0.166 <0.001 3.511 0.129 0.109 0.150 <0.001
39Comoros1.315 0.057 0.011 0.103 0.018 1.757 0.071 0.022 0.121 0.006 2.113 0.084 0.046 0.121 <0.001
40Congo4.186 0.179 0.154 0.204 <0.001 3.259 0.134 0.108 0.160 <0.001 3.137 0.144 0.124 0.165 <0.001
41Costa Rica1.848 0.073 0.054 0.093 <0.001 2.726 0.106 0.086 0.127 <0.001 2.157 0.085 0.061 0.109 <0.001
42Cote d’Ivoire1.304 0.053 0.027 0.078 <0.001 1.317 0.034 0.011 0.057 0.005 1.942 0.092 0.069 0.115 <0.001
43Croatia−11.731 −0.605 −0.711 −0.499 <0.001 −15.729 −0.749 −0.947 −0.551 <0.001 −8.157 −0.480 −0.541 −0.419 <0.001
44Cuba5.371 0.221 0.192 0.251 <0.001 7.643 0.291 0.263 0.319 <0.001 3.718 0.169 0.141 0.198 <0.001
45Cyprus−1.128 −0.162 −0.246 −0.077 0.001 1.872 0.027 0.004 0.050 0.021 −7.131 −0.546 −0.765 −0.327 <0.001
46Czech Republic−9.462 −0.288 −0.381 −0.196 <0.001 −10.369 −0.258 −0.383 −0.132 <0.001 −11.376 −0.457 −0.528 −0.385 <0.001
47Democratic Republic of the Congo4.480 0.210 0.162 0.257 <0.001 5.193 0.238 0.183 0.294 <0.001 3.770 0.172 0.141 0.203 <0.001
48Denmark1.823 −0.039 −0.118 0.041 0.325 0.480 −0.123 −0.238 −0.008 0.037 1.210 −0.001 −0.022 0.020 0.901
49Djibouti0.180 −0.011 −0.029 0.008 0.257 −0.960 −0.050 −0.073 −0.028 <0.001 0.373 0.013 −0.012 0.039 0.287
50Dominica7.734 0.301 0.288 0.315 <0.001 6.972 0.273 0.249 0.296 <0.001 4.330 0.173 0.157 0.190 <0.001
51Dominican Republic5.455 0.229 0.208 0.249 <0.001 6.870 0.277 0.250 0.305 <0.001 4.285 0.170 0.157 0.183 <0.001
52Ecuador20.409 1.006 0.889 1.124 <0.001 15.411 0.829 0.721 0.936 <0.001 26.535 1.209 1.076 1.342 <0.001
53Egypt2.670 0.103 0.090 0.117 <0.001 2.474 0.100 0.088 0.113 <0.001 1.959 0.072 0.060 0.083 <0.001
54El Salvador3.046 0.116 0.094 0.138 <0.001 5.040 0.182 0.161 0.204 <0.001 2.796 0.116 0.095 0.138 <0.001
55Equatorial Guinea7.297 0.321 0.284 0.359 <0.001 8.401 0.346 0.288 0.404 <0.001 5.772 0.262 0.233 0.291 <0.001
56Eritrea2.160 0.039 0.012 0.066 0.006 1.512 −0.033 −0.071 0.006 0.097 3.915 0.144 0.118 0.169 <0.001
57Estonia−3.388 −0.165 −0.265 −0.064 0.002 −6.013 −0.303 −0.384 −0.222 <0.001 −4.609 −0.174 −0.295 −0.053 0.006
58Ethiopia−0.327 0.031 −0.062 0.123 0.501 −2.463 −0.039 −0.156 0.079 0.506 2.128 0.133 0.055 0.210 0.002
59Federated States of Micronesia−3.597 −0.158 −0.169 −0.146 <0.001 1.147 0.034 0.006 0.062 0.019 −9.703 −0.418 −0.453 −0.384 <0.001
60Fiji1.621 0.073 0.054 0.092 <0.001 2.101 0.085 0.067 0.103 <0.001 1.702 0.070 0.051 0.089 <0.001
61Finland−6.480 −0.242 −0.593 0.110 0.169 −8.061 −0.334 −0.655 −0.011 0.043 −8.630 −0.292 −0.683 0.101 0.139
62France2.136 0.058 0.037 0.079 <0.001 0.697 0.011 −0.018 0.040 0.448 2.543 0.072 0.061 0.082 <0.001
63Gabon2.436 0.098 0.093 0.103 <0.001 1.942 0.068 0.060 0.075 <0.001 2.201 0.099 0.088 0.109 <0.001
64Georgia−5.470 −0.295 −0.355 −0.234 <0.001 −7.376 −0.386 −0.457 −0.315 <0.001 −5.282 −0.275 −0.323 −0.228 <0.001
65Germany17.760 0.833 0.722 0.944 <0.001 16.550 0.805 0.681 0.929 <0.001 13.405 0.667 0.568 0.766 <0.001
66Ghana1.944 0.072 0.058 0.085 <0.001 2.850 0.094 0.082 0.107 <0.001 3.080 0.142 0.116 0.169 <0.001
67Greece1.826 0.033 0.018 0.047 <0.001 1.508 0.017 −0.003 0.037 0.100 1.587 0.031 0.021 0.040 <0.001
68Greenland2.691 0.104 0.093 0.114 <0.001 −0.371 −0.026 −0.049 −0.003 0.031 1.222 0.049 0.038 0.060 <0.001
69Grenada5.659 0.249 0.194 0.304 <0.001 0.707 0.063 −0.059 0.186 0.299 4.733 0.187 0.168 0.206 <0.001
70Guam−5.518 −0.258 −0.306 −0.209 <0.001 −2.170 −0.110 −0.137 −0.082 <0.001 −9.831 −0.462 −0.513 −0.410 <0.001
71Guatemala3.224 0.137 0.106 0.168 <0.001 4.964 0.200 0.172 0.228 <0.001 3.287 0.140 0.113 0.166 <0.001
72Guinea3.424 0.147 0.111 0.183 <0.001 3.898 0.154 0.116 0.191 <0.001 2.672 0.120 0.088 0.152 <0.001
73Guinea-Bissau−0.253 −0.019 −0.048 0.010 0.196 −0.373 −0.033 −0.054 −0.013 0.003 1.255 0.044 0.010 0.077 0.012
74Guyana6.636 0.248 0.230 0.266 <0.001 8.053 0.307 0.281 0.334 <0.001 5.779 0.206 0.203 0.208 <0.001
75Haiti5.985 0.243 0.218 0.267 <0.001 7.402 0.296 0.262 0.329 <0.001 5.623 0.236 0.208 0.263 <0.001
76Honduras4.862 0.156 0.145 0.167 <0.001 5.446 0.168 0.155 0.182 <0.001 4.933 0.176 0.171 0.180 <0.001
77Hungary−16.069 −0.543 −0.615 −0.471 <0.001 −17.486 −0.590 −0.665 −0.514 <0.001 −15.098 −0.512 −0.580 −0.445 <0.001
78Iceland−5.340 −0.314 −0.385 −0.243 <0.001 −8.058 −0.461 −0.559 −0.363 <0.001 −1.580 −0.098 −0.128 −0.068 <0.001
79India14.709 0.638 0.534 0.742 <0.001 14.550 0.603 0.519 0.687 <0.001 17.276 0.775 0.641 0.908 <0.001
80Indonesia−16.520 −0.900 −1.050 −0.749 <0.001 −19.533 −1.044 −1.197 −0.891 <0.001 −10.651 −0.628 −0.772 −0.485 <0.001
81Iran3.079 0.019 −0.116 0.155 0.772 3.550 0.045 −0.101 0.191 0.534 3.182 0.030 −0.092 0.151 0.617
82Iraq−0.311 −0.002 −0.013 0.009 0.703 −0.717 −0.017 −0.031 −0.002 0.024 −0.374 −0.003 −0.015 0.009 0.587
83Ireland2.518 0.068 0.053 0.083 <0.001 1.935 0.041 0.019 0.063 0.001 2.448 0.055 0.042 0.069 <0.001
84Israel3.152 0.088 0.076 0.100 <0.001 2.727 0.067 0.053 0.081 <0.001 2.628 0.061 0.049 0.073 <0.001
85Italy−13.545 −0.665 −0.861 −0.469 <0.001 −17.931 −0.893 −1.026 −0.760 <0.001 −8.570 −0.400 −0.714 −0.086 0.015
86Jamaica6.283 0.244 0.236 0.252 <0.001 7.186 0.265 0.258 0.272 <0.001 4.290 0.177 0.161 0.193 <0.001
87Japan−1.348 −0.108 −0.141 −0.074 <0.001 −1.209 −0.088 −0.112 −0.064 <0.001 −3.429 −0.209 −0.262 −0.156 <0.001
88Jordan2.986 0.127 0.100 0.154 <0.001 2.265 0.100 0.089 0.111 <0.001 1.462 0.060 0.045 0.075 <0.001
89Kazakhstan−8.764 −0.328 −0.360 −0.297 <0.001 −8.258 −0.256 −0.298 −0.213 <0.001 −11.232 −0.480 −0.521 −0.439 <0.001
90Kenya3.821 0.143 0.110 0.176 <0.001 5.110 0.182 0.155 0.210 <0.001 3.298 0.126 0.090 0.162 <0.001
91Kiribati−0.710 −0.024 −0.053 0.004 0.084 −0.320 −0.001 −0.040 0.038 0.966 0.481 0.008 −0.001 0.016 0.083
92Kuwait−1.278 −0.064 −0.096 −0.032 <0.001 1.975 0.080 0.072 0.088 <0.001 1.540 0.069 0.064 0.073 <0.001
93Kyrgyzstan−3.843 −0.104 −0.159 −0.049 0.001 −7.849 −0.280 −0.338 −0.222 <0.001 0.452 0.096 0.021 0.172 0.015
94Laos6.147 0.237 0.192 0.282 <0.001 6.120 0.242 0.181 0.303 <0.001 4.152 0.154 0.129 0.180 <0.001
95Latvia−8.826 −0.395 −0.497 −0.294 <0.001 −9.813 −0.484 −0.576 −0.392 <0.001 −10.211 −0.427 −0.550 −0.304 <0.001
96Lebanon2.910 0.116 0.104 0.128 <0.001 2.385 0.098 0.087 0.109 <0.001 1.853 0.077 0.065 0.088 <0.001
97Lesotho3.328 0.129 0.102 0.156 <0.001 4.882 0.186 0.159 0.212 <0.001 3.377 0.136 0.106 0.166 <0.001
98Liberia2.544 0.153 0.105 0.200 <0.001 3.396 0.186 0.136 0.237 <0.001 3.004 0.162 0.123 0.200 <0.001
99Libya−0.126 0.032 0.011 0.053 0.004 1.969 0.083 0.074 0.092 <0.001 1.688 0.071 0.062 0.081 <0.001
100Lithuania−10.033 −0.408 −0.512 −0.304 <0.001 −11.906 −0.480 −0.556 −0.404 <0.001 −7.838 −0.304 −0.427 −0.182 <0.001
101Luxembourg10.205 0.182 −0.066 0.430 0.144 6.913 0.025 −0.218 0.268 0.835 10.308 0.276 0.010 0.542 0.043
102Macedonia1.776 0.073 0.057 0.089 <0.001 2.013 0.084 0.071 0.098 <0.001 1.728 0.065 0.053 0.077 <0.001
103Madagascar2.832 0.118 0.072 0.165 <0.001 4.177 0.161 0.111 0.211 <0.001 2.615 0.121 0.083 0.160 <0.001
104Malawi3.150 0.111 0.079 0.144 <0.001 4.413 0.159 0.121 0.197 <0.001 3.530 0.149 0.108 0.190 <0.001
105Malaysia5.510 0.189 0.168 0.211 <0.001 4.894 0.170 0.140 0.201 <0.001 4.000 0.126 0.113 0.138 <0.001
106Maldives5.354 0.219 0.144 0.295 <0.001 5.877 0.235 0.195 0.276 <0.001 2.305 0.096 0.072 0.121 <0.001
107Mali3.341 0.144 0.111 0.177 <0.001 3.259 0.136 0.098 0.173 <0.001 2.476 0.121 0.088 0.154 <0.001
108Malta11.694 0.634 0.494 0.774 <0.001 8.636 0.548 0.389 0.708 <0.001 11.539 0.562 0.462 0.661 <0.001
109Marshall Islands−3.624 −0.187 −0.209 −0.164 <0.001 −1.073 −0.051 −0.083 −0.020 0.002 −7.890 −0.408 −0.498 −0.318 <0.001
110Mauritania−0.273 −0.008 −0.037 0.021 0.592 0.142 0.006 −0.032 0.044 0.748 −1.533 −0.049 −0.074 −0.025 <0.001
111Mauritius3.926 0.128 0.112 0.144 <0.001 3.850 0.122 0.108 0.136 <0.001 3.107 0.100 0.083 0.117 <0.001
112Mexico−4.399 −0.156 −0.222 −0.090 <0.001 −4.791 −0.200 −0.293 −0.108 <0.001 −3.403 −0.076 −0.115 −0.037 <0.001
113Moldova5.635 0.286 0.161 0.411 <0.001 5.921 0.297 0.158 0.437 <0.001 4.767 0.257 0.140 0.374 <0.001
114Mongolia−0.587 0.019 −0.062 0.100 0.637 5.854 0.312 0.220 0.404 <0.001 −6.690 −0.297 −0.375 −0.219 <0.001
115Montenegro2.168 0.088 0.074 0.101 <0.001 2.149 0.088 0.072 0.105 <0.001 1.444 0.063 0.052 0.075 <0.001
116Morocco2.288 0.089 0.066 0.112 <0.001 2.144 0.090 0.075 0.104 <0.001 1.932 0.069 0.056 0.082 <0.001
117Mozambique4.829 0.216 0.190 0.242 <0.001 6.813 0.284 0.264 0.304 <0.001 4.307 0.193 0.159 0.228 <0.001
118Myanmar4.117 0.176 0.137 0.215 <0.001 6.740 0.283 0.233 0.332 <0.001 4.326 0.170 0.140 0.199 <0.001
119Namibia1.929 0.094 0.071 0.116 <0.001 2.887 0.117 0.096 0.139 <0.001 2.259 0.117 0.091 0.143 <0.001
120Nepal8.460 0.321 0.287 0.354 <0.001 11.222 0.415 0.365 0.465 <0.001 7.660 0.285 0.257 0.313 <0.001
121Netherlands−2.467 −0.098 −0.123 −0.074 <0.001 −4.608 −0.179 −0.205 −0.152 <0.001 −2.554 −0.106 −0.127 −0.085 <0.001
122New Zealand−21.001 −0.673 −0.915 −0.430 <0.001 −21.187 −0.693 −0.903 −0.482 <0.001 −21.354 −0.674 −0.984 −0.364 <0.001
123Nicaragua4.133 0.161 0.135 0.186 <0.001 4.729 0.184 0.156 0.211 <0.001 3.051 0.126 0.103 0.148 <0.001
124Niger1.941 0.097 0.055 0.139 <0.001 2.650 0.117 0.071 0.163 <0.001 2.833 0.146 0.107 0.186 <0.001
125Nigeria1.185 0.064 0.045 0.083 <0.001 3.089 0.134 0.097 0.170 <0.001 2.587 0.136 0.107 0.166 <0.001
126North Korea6.919 0.294 0.243 0.346 <0.001 5.019 0.249 0.184 0.314 <0.001 3.930 0.161 0.136 0.185 <0.001
127Northern Mariana Islands−8.478 −0.340 −0.372 −0.309 <0.001 −0.985 −0.047 −0.071 −0.022 0.001 −15.525 −0.683 −0.706 −0.660 <0.001
128Norway9.477 0.515 0.412 0.619 <0.001 13.009 0.731 0.562 0.899 <0.001 −3.009 −0.138 −0.162 −0.115 <0.001
129Oman4.436 0.193 0.123 0.264 <0.001 2.002 0.084 0.075 0.093 <0.001 1.755 0.074 0.068 0.080 <0.001
130Pakistan8.496 0.316 0.289 0.344 <0.001 10.865 0.389 0.355 0.422 <0.001 6.605 0.260 0.235 0.284 <0.001
131Palestine4.429 0.156 0.147 0.166 <0.001 2.835 0.114 0.104 0.125 <0.001 2.512 0.099 0.081 0.117 <0.001
132Panama2.655 0.102 0.078 0.126 <0.001 2.990 0.112 0.087 0.137 <0.001 2.965 0.118 0.096 0.140 <0.001
133Papua New Guinea0.270 0.005 −0.026 0.037 0.727 2.446 0.089 0.055 0.123 <0.001 −3.156 −0.147 −0.175 −0.119 <0.001
134Paraguay3.015 0.118 0.110 0.126 <0.001 2.968 0.120 0.108 0.133 <0.001 3.077 0.122 0.114 0.130 <0.001
135Peru3.332 0.141 0.120 0.161 <0.001 3.272 0.135 0.110 0.161 <0.001 3.377 0.143 0.127 0.160 <0.001
136Philippines3.481 −0.019 −0.367 0.330 0.911 2.955 −0.060 −0.442 0.323 0.750 6.341 0.144 −0.140 0.428 0.308
137Poland−6.833 −0.193 −0.223 −0.163 <0.001 −9.146 −0.273 −0.338 −0.208 <0.001 −4.978 −0.139 −0.198 −0.080 <0.001
138Portugal−1.138 −0.114 −0.156 −0.073 <0.001 −5.605 −0.342 −0.426 −0.258 <0.001 5.214 0.211 0.176 0.247 <0.001
139Puerto Rico4.651 0.186 0.167 0.206 <0.001 5.721 0.231 0.210 0.251 <0.001 4.282 0.164 0.152 0.175 <0.001
140Qatar4.731 0.248 0.214 0.282 <0.001 1.720 0.081 0.076 0.087 <0.001 1.492 0.049 0.046 0.051 <0.001
141Romania1.995 0.088 0.075 0.102 <0.001 1.982 0.089 0.078 0.100 <0.001 1.776 0.074 0.062 0.085 <0.001
142Russian Federation−8.925 −0.360 −0.462 −0.257 <0.001 −10.881 −0.449 −0.555 −0.343 <0.001 −10.095 −0.383 −0.504 −0.262 <0.001
143Rwanda2.390 0.121 0.064 0.179 <0.001 3.382 0.149 0.094 0.205 <0.001 3.113 0.152 0.109 0.196 <0.001
144Saint Lucia6.169 0.229 0.221 0.238 <0.001 6.504 0.260 0.234 0.285 <0.001 3.317 0.110 0.066 0.155 <0.001
145Saint Vincent and the Grenadines6.514 0.241 0.227 0.255 <0.001 3.842 0.137 0.119 0.154 <0.001 4.552 0.183 0.169 0.197 <0.001
146Samoa−0.597 −0.049 −0.066 −0.031 <0.001 1.906 0.068 0.046 0.090 <0.001 −4.237 −0.229 −0.251 −0.206 <0.001
147Sao Tome and Principe3.755 0.167 0.133 0.201 <0.001 3.768 0.165 0.132 0.199 <0.001 2.984 0.138 0.110 0.166 <0.001
148Saudi Arabia1.690 0.079 0.059 0.100 <0.001 1.999 0.088 0.080 0.096 <0.001 1.981 0.073 0.063 0.084 <0.001
149Senegal1.543 0.067 0.032 0.102 0.001 1.471 0.050 0.011 0.089 0.014 2.566 0.119 0.088 0.150 <0.001
150Serbia−0.273 −0.020 −0.043 0.002 0.077 −4.874 −0.264 −0.328 −0.201 <0.001 5.046 0.251 0.215 0.288 <0.001
151Seychelles5.307 0.186 0.159 0.214 <0.001 3.868 0.117 0.096 0.137 <0.001 3.272 0.112 0.099 0.124 <0.001
152Sierra Leone2.899 0.125 0.079 0.171 <0.001 2.973 0.115 0.073 0.158 <0.001 2.857 0.134 0.098 0.170 <0.001
153Singapore−1.730 −0.049 −0.080 −0.018 0.003 −1.903 −0.048 −0.083 −0.013 0.010 −0.040 0.002 −0.023 0.027 0.894
154Slovakia−3.070 −0.224 −0.272 −0.176 <0.001 1.384 −0.057 −0.140 0.027 0.178 −9.854 −0.512 −0.564 −0.459 <0.001
155Slovenia−7.616 −0.382 −0.470 −0.294 <0.001 −8.886 −0.439 −0.536 −0.342 <0.001 −8.851 −0.432 −0.509 −0.356 <0.001
156Solomon Islands−1.853 −0.082 −0.115 −0.048 <0.001 2.609 0.108 0.068 0.147 <0.001 −5.460 −0.260 −0.289 −0.230 <0.001
157Somalia2.097 0.085 0.036 0.135 0.002 1.969 0.062 0.016 0.108 0.010 3.425 0.157 0.106 0.207 <0.001
158South Africa3.120 0.142 0.123 0.162 <0.001 3.408 0.143 0.132 0.153 <0.001 2.860 0.138 0.120 0.157 <0.001
159South Korea3.072 0.095 0.075 0.115 <0.001 1.573 0.026 0.012 0.040 0.001 2.073 0.082 0.067 0.097 <0.001
160South Sudan−2.323 −0.095 −0.106 −0.083 <0.001 −1.567 −0.061 −0.071 −0.051 <0.001 −0.358 −0.003 −0.028 0.022 0.807
161Spain3.496 0.106 0.093 0.119 <0.001 2.607 0.071 0.048 0.094 <0.001 2.779 0.071 0.059 0.084 <0.001
162Sri Lanka0.963 0.030 −0.007 0.067 0.104 3.962 0.145 0.113 0.178 <0.001 2.776 0.091 0.071 0.111 <0.001
163Sudan2.728 0.110 0.101 0.118 <0.001 2.480 0.106 0.091 0.121 <0.001 2.177 0.091 0.074 0.108 <0.001
164Suriname1.372 0.110 0.041 0.179 0.003 0.124 0.104 −0.016 0.224 0.086 4.912 0.197 0.183 0.212 <0.001
165Swaziland2.746 0.107 0.097 0.118 <0.001 3.137 0.114 0.108 0.121 <0.001 3.013 0.123 0.104 0.143 <0.001
166Sweden−2.233 −0.071 −0.237 0.094 0.384 −5.924 −0.176 −0.383 0.031 0.093 1.160 −0.002 −0.101 0.097 0.967
167Switzerland7.571 0.149 0.021 0.276 0.024 8.179 0.163 0.014 0.312 0.034 2.701 −0.015 −0.108 0.079 0.749
168Syria2.343 0.108 0.097 0.119 <0.001 2.499 0.112 0.100 0.124 <0.001 2.447 0.098 0.086 0.110 <0.001
169Taiwan50.579 1.208 0.738 1.681 <0.001 63.051 1.482 0.937 2.029 <0.001 36.035 0.908 0.585 1.232 <0.001
170Tajikistan3.941 0.222 0.130 0.314 <0.001 2.512 0.177 0.057 0.296 0.005 3.401 0.188 0.120 0.257 <0.001
171Tanzania3.344 0.143 0.102 0.184 <0.001 3.792 0.150 0.105 0.194 <0.001 3.318 0.151 0.113 0.188 <0.001
172Thailand−7.106 −0.369 −0.417 −0.320 <0.001 −11.754 −0.606 −0.695 −0.517 <0.001 2.379 0.053 0.015 0.091 0.009
173The Bahamas4.776 0.203 0.183 0.224 <0.001 5.729 0.225 0.209 0.241 <0.001 2.392 0.126 0.105 0.146 <0.001
174The Gambia0.712 0.036 −0.001 0.073 0.056 1.403 0.057 0.024 0.091 0.001 2.278 0.110 0.078 0.142 <0.001
175Timor-Leste5.936 0.226 0.181 0.271 <0.001 7.670 0.281 0.228 0.335 <0.001 4.081 0.161 0.133 0.189 <0.001
176Togo1.686 0.072 0.039 0.105 <0.001 2.294 0.086 0.057 0.116 <0.001 2.818 0.133 0.099 0.167 <0.001
177Tonga1.981 0.065 0.048 0.083 <0.001 1.507 0.046 0.024 0.068 <0.001 1.879 0.068 0.047 0.089 <0.001
178Trinidad and Tobago1.874 0.169 0.098 0.239 <0.001 0.735 0.129 0.060 0.199 0.001 2.794 0.203 0.137 0.270 <0.001
179Tunisia1.239 0.053 0.038 0.067 <0.001 2.256 0.091 0.078 0.104 <0.001 1.538 0.069 0.057 0.081 <0.001
180Turkey7.071 0.407 0.331 0.482 <0.001 11.530 0.613 0.498 0.728 <0.001 −0.535 0.015 −0.009 0.039 0.205
181Turkmenistan6.083 0.302 0.212 0.391 <0.001 5.477 0.292 0.182 0.403 <0.001 3.725 0.193 0.132 0.255 <0.001
182Uganda3.251 0.142 0.101 0.183 <0.001 5.502 0.225 0.182 0.267 <0.001 3.935 0.166 0.128 0.203 <0.001
183Ukraine−6.342 −0.353 −0.523 −0.182 <0.001 −2.580 −0.212 −0.382 −0.042 0.016 −12.187 −0.597 −0.790 −0.404 <0.001
184United Arab Emirates3.938 0.168 0.147 0.190 <0.001 2.124 0.094 0.087 0.101 <0.001 1.717 0.061 0.055 0.067 <0.001
185United Kingdom4.643 0.747 0.508 0.987 <0.001 1.631 0.551 0.356 0.747 <0.001 6.956 0.974 0.657 1.293 <0.001
186United States−5.819 −0.352 −0.559 −0.145 0.002 −7.233 −0.646 −0.877 −0.415 <0.001 −6.156 −0.007 −0.238 0.224 0.949
187Uruguay2.431 0.088 0.080 0.096 <0.001 3.258 0.120 0.116 0.124 <0.001 1.927 0.068 0.058 0.078 <0.001
188Uzbekistan4.127 0.228 0.157 0.300 <0.001 4.048 0.237 0.142 0.332 <0.001 2.801 0.163 0.108 0.219 <0.001
189Vanuatu0.745 0.034 −0.001 0.069 0.058 2.526 0.104 0.076 0.131 <0.001 0.375 0.021 −0.012 0.054 0.207
190Venezuela1.662 0.067 0.041 0.093 <0.001 2.580 0.089 0.064 0.114 <0.001 0.355 0.024 −0.002 0.051 0.073
191Vietnam7.532 0.299 0.259 0.338 <0.001 7.540 0.309 0.257 0.361 <0.001 4.169 0.158 0.134 0.183 <0.001
192Virgin Islands, U.S.1.292 0.065 −0.021 0.151 0.134 6.349 0.246 0.118 0.375 0.001 −3.586 −0.132 −0.172 −0.092 <0.001
193Yemen2.381 0.089 0.080 0.098 <0.001 2.507 0.102 0.089 0.115 <0.001 2.189 0.088 0.073 0.103 <0.001
194Zambia−0.354 −0.019 −0.050 0.012 0.214 0.639 0.023 0.007 0.038 0.007 0.674 0.035 −0.013 0.083 0.146
195Zimbabwe1.296 0.032 0.021 0.043 <0.001 2.546 0.062 0.045 0.079 <0.001 2.560 0.101 0.075 0.127 <0.001
Abbreviations: PC: percentage change; APC: annual percentage change. p < 0.001 considered significant.
Table 4. Percentage change and annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and SDI level.
Table 4. Percentage change and annual percentage change of age standardized incidence rate of urolithiasis stratified by gender and SDI level.
Both Male and FemaleMaleFemale
PCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-Value
Global−9.995 −0.459 −0.506 −0.411 <0.001 −11.433 −0.557 −0.615 −0.499 <0.001 −8.227 −0.312 −0.367 −0.258 <0.001
Low SDI7.620 0.335 0.268 0.403 <0.001 9.028 0.375 0.307 0.443 <0.001 7.492 0.352 0.280 0.423 <0.001
Low-middle SDI2.899 0.121 0.094 0.147 <0.001 3.145 0.107 0.089 0.126 <0.001 4.540 0.221 0.174 0.268 <0.001
Middle SDI−11.840 −0.625 −0.731 −0.520 <0.001 −14.600 −0.783 −0.920 −0.646 <0.001 −5.982 −0.309 −0.363 −0.254 <0.001
High-middle SDI−23.757 −1.165 −1.255 −1.074 <0.001 −24.098 −1.204 −1.311 −1.096 <0.001 −25.151 −1.195 −1.271 −1.120 <0.001
High SDI−1.774 −0.103 −0.174 −0.033 0.006 −3.155 −0.218 −0.293 −0.143 <0.001 −2.358 −0.009 −0.096 0.079 0.840
Abbreviations: PC: percentage change; APC: annual percentage change; SDI: sociodemographic index. p < 0.001 considered significant.
Table 5. Percentage change and annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 21 regions.
Table 5. Percentage change and annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 21 regions.
Both Male and FemaleMaleFemale
PCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-Value
Central Asia−18.427 −1.325 −1.663 −0.986 <0.001 −15.861 −1.145 −1.439 −0.849 <0.001 −23.294 −1.646 −2.061 −1.230 <0.001
Eastern Asia−65.808 −4.678 −4.953 −4.403 <0.001 −62.349 −4.110 −4.352 −3.867 <0.001 −71.220 −5.633 −6.046 −5.218 <0.001
High-income Asia Pacific13.003 0.670 0.577 0.762 <0.001 4.323 0.270 0.200 0.341 <0.001 22.671 1.092 0.964 1.221 <0.001
South Asia−11.841 −0.459 −0.562 −0.355 <0.001 −10.493 −0.343 −0.425 −0.261 <0.001 −10.347 −0.477 −0.659 −0.295 <0.001
Southeast Asia3.713 −0.284 −0.517 −0.050 0.019 −5.895 −0.742 −0.989 −0.494 <0.001 30.817 0.765 0.470 1.060 <0.001
Central Europe−53.614 −2.776 −3.305 −2.245 <0.001 −52.706 −2.678 −3.177 −2.176 <0.001 −55.245 −2.947 −3.509 −2.382 <0.001
Eastern Europe−28.217 −1.768 −2.177 −1.357 <0.001 −29.962 −1.845 −2.239 −1.451 <0.001 −30.651 −1.918 −2.369 −1.465 <0.001
Western Europe−10.909 −0.137 −0.318 0.044 0.132 −11.504 −0.168 −0.346 0.010 0.063 −12.669 −0.199 −0.398 <0.001 0.050
Andean Latin America−10.561 −0.323 −0.406 −0.240 <0.001 −12.678 −0.359 −0.442 −0.276 <0.001 −7.983 −0.280 −0.383 −0.176 <0.001
Central Latin America3.083 0.172 −0.127 0.471 0.249 −4.440 −0.057 −0.328 0.214 0.668 12.273 0.420 0.082 0.760 0.017
Southern Latin America−2.953 −0.181 −0.229 −0.134 <0.001 −2.691 −0.129 −0.206 −0.052 0.002 −3.069 −0.226 −0.296 −0.156 <0.001
Tropical Latin America115.258 3.248 3.142 3.354 <0.001 89.802 2.770 2.649 2.892 <0.001 141.624 3.668 3.549 3.788 <0.001
High-income North America−2.392 0.022 −0.168 0.212 0.815 −7.531 −0.391 −0.584 −0.197 <0.001 1.858 0.454 0.223 0.687 <0.001
Central Sub-Saharan Africa−3.961 −0.254 −0.318 −0.190 <0.001 −1.286 −0.165 −0.228 −0.101 <0.001 −4.459 −0.275 −0.336 −0.214 <0.001
Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa−21.744 −1.194 −1.319 −1.069 <0.001 −19.306 −1.049 −1.160 −0.938 <0.001 −23.094 −1.288 −1.440 −1.137 <0.001
Southern Sub-Saharan Africa−2.270 −0.264 −0.789 0.263 0.312 5.779 −0.005 −0.523 0.516 0.984 −11.691 −0.614 −1.195 −0.029 0.040
Western Sub-Saharan Africa−17.285 −0.993 −1.146 −0.839 <0.001 −15.489 −0.978 −1.166 −0.790 <0.001 −19.677 −1.002 −1.119 −0.885 <0.001
North Africa and Middle East0.932 0.035 −0.036 0.106 0.322 3.794 0.206 0.143 0.268 <0.001 −4.249 −0.274 −0.381 −0.167 <0.001
Oceania−29.103 −1.420 −1.555 −1.284 <0.001 −22.757 −1.021 −1.195 −0.848 <0.001 −33.942 −1.724 −1.837 −1.611 <0.001
Australasia−34.669 −1.304 −1.686 −0.920 <0.001 −37.597 −1.509 −1.890 −1.127 <0.001 −33.330 −1.185 −1.584 −0.784 <0.001
Caribbean25.854 1.133 0.986 1.280 <0.001 38.205 1.401 1.284 1.518 <0.001 14.286 0.832 0.572 1.093 <0.001
Abbreviations: PC: percentage change; APC: annual percentage change. p < 0.001 considered significant.
Table 6. Percentage change and annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 195 Countries and territories.
Table 6. Percentage change and annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and 195 Countries and territories.
Both Male and FemaleMaleFemale
NumberCountries and TerritoriesPCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-Value
1Afghanistan15.058 0.712 0.610 0.813 <0.001 12.701 0.588 0.494 0.682 <0.001 20.151 0.927 0.809 1.046 <0.001
2Albania−23.995 −0.891 −1.161 −0.620 <0.001 −37.147 −1.568 −2.023 −1.110 <0.001 0.662 −0.016 −0.041 0.008 0.182
3Algeria5.555 0.249 0.228 0.270 <0.001 3.006 0.132 0.114 0.150 <0.001 9.369 0.422 0.386 0.459 <0.001
4American Samoa−57.879 −4.974 −6.065 −3.871 <0.001 −63.640 −5.687 −6.894 −4.463 <0.001 −49.481 −4.080 −5.072 −3.078 <0.001
5Andorra−8.383 −0.309 −0.421 −0.198 <0.001 −10.128 −0.345 −0.413 −0.276 <0.001 −4.363 −0.158 −0.361 0.045 0.121
6Angola−6.882 −0.471 −0.562 −0.381 <0.001 −3.606 −0.353 −0.449 −0.256 <0.001 −5.742 −0.409 −0.497 −0.320 <0.001
7Antigua and Barbuda28.971 1.047 0.839 1.256 <0.001 9.861 0.373 0.262 0.485 <0.001 44.867 1.578 1.246 1.910 <0.001
8Argentina−1.901 −0.007 −0.112 0.097 0.889 −5.406 −0.163 −0.320 −0.005 0.044 1.871 0.151 0.083 0.218 <0.001
9Armenia50.908 1.995 1.279 2.716 <0.001 61.061 2.221 1.585 2.860 <0.001 39.743 1.669 0.877 2.467 <0.001
10Australia−35.315 −1.425 −1.752 −1.098 <0.001 −39.554 −1.654 −1.993 −1.313 <0.001 −32.122 −1.275 −1.602 −0.946 <0.001
11Austria−50.089 −1.786 −2.365 −1.203 <0.001 −40.020 −0.955 −1.356 −0.552 <0.001 −59.048 −2.804 −3.593 −2.007 <0.001
12Azerbaijan23.858 0.821 0.638 1.003 <0.001 10.600 0.414 0.373 0.454 <0.001 32.914 1.083 0.770 1.396 <0.001
13Bahrain5.745 −0.134 −0.361 0.093 0.235 4.565 0.143 0.101 0.186 <0.001 2.802 −0.805 −1.339 −0.268 0.005
14Bangladesh−16.943 −0.491 −0.615 −0.367 <0.001 −6.171 0.045 −0.129 0.218 0.601 −29.580 −1.239 −1.341 −1.138 <0.001
15Barbados−4.192 0.201 0.055 0.347 0.009 −4.387 0.078 −0.053 0.209 0.234 −6.469 0.252 −0.079 0.584 0.130
16Belarus−31.658 −1.956 −2.133 −1.779 <0.001 −20.341 −1.298 −1.449 −1.147 <0.001 −41.282 −2.606 −2.816 −2.396 <0.001
17Belgium28.074 1.353 1.041 1.665 <0.001 27.147 1.251 0.944 1.559 <0.001 27.233 1.404 1.086 1.722 <0.001
18Belize41.679 1.259 1.023 1.495 <0.001 47.698 1.181 0.892 1.472 <0.001 35.897 1.269 1.012 1.526 <0.001
19Benin−17.242 −1.019 −1.178 −0.860 <0.001 −20.757 −1.373 −1.610 −1.136 <0.001 −9.717 −0.421 −0.494 −0.347 <0.001
20Bermuda−6.617 −0.057 −0.235 0.122 0.521 1.328 0.316 0.232 0.401 <0.001 −12.465 −0.349 −0.643 −0.054 0.022
21Bhutan−20.917 −0.897 −0.931 −0.863 <0.001 −19.047 −0.699 −0.762 −0.635 <0.001 −24.403 −1.193 −1.257 −1.129 <0.001
22Bolivia−21.064 −0.619 −0.781 −0.457 <0.001 −23.808 −0.697 −0.856 −0.538 <0.001 −17.851 −0.523 −0.699 −0.347 <0.001
23Bosnia and Herzegovina−22.795 −1.381 −1.636 −1.126 <0.001 −23.227 −1.377 −1.639 −1.114 <0.001 −24.058 −1.500 −1.763 −1.237 <0.001
24Botswana−3.975 −0.072 −0.220 0.075 0.321 −17.143 −0.848 −0.910 −0.786 <0.001 15.300 0.932 0.655 1.209 <0.001
25Brazil116.654 3.279 3.170 3.387 <0.001 91.467 2.815 2.689 2.941 <0.001 142.686 3.686 3.565 3.808 <0.001
26Brunei−23.121 −1.015 −1.279 −0.750 <0.001 −24.840 −1.126 −1.421 −0.830 <0.001 0.425 0.020 −0.050 0.089 0.564
27Bulgaria−75.459 −6.073 −7.056 −5.080 <0.001 −76.813 −6.330 −7.323 −5.326 <0.001 −73.777 −5.784 −6.760 −4.799 <0.001
28Burkina Faso−13.408 −0.692 −0.827 −0.557 <0.001 −14.846 −0.880 −1.083 −0.676 <0.001 −8.763 −0.328 −0.386 −0.271 <0.001
29Burundi−24.946 −1.398 −1.569 −1.228 <0.001 −29.735 −1.651 −1.828 −1.474 <0.001 −25.138 −1.403 −1.575 −1.231 <0.001
30Cambodia−23.372 −0.995 −1.090 −0.901 <0.001 −21.376 −0.830 −0.945 −0.715 <0.001 −24.158 −1.160 −1.245 −1.075 <0.001
31Cameroon−22.199 −1.383 −1.593 −1.172 <0.001 −14.109 −1.106 −1.354 −0.857 <0.001 −30.550 −1.724 −1.904 −1.544 <0.001
32Canada8.418 0.633 0.496 0.771 <0.001 7.003 0.580 0.443 0.718 <0.001 8.398 0.639 0.491 0.788 <0.001
33Cape Verde6.343 0.233 0.200 0.265 <0.001 5.101 0.147 0.125 0.169 <0.001 5.483 0.237 0.180 0.293 <0.001
34Central African Republic2.214 0.054 −0.014 0.122 0.115 5.567 0.127 0.045 0.210 0.004 −2.899 −0.073 −0.143 −0.002 0.044
35Chad−17.860 −1.071 −1.270 −0.872 <0.001 −19.333 −1.272 −1.537 −1.005 <0.001 −19.760 −0.988 −1.125 −0.851 <0.001
36Chile−12.798 −0.870 −1.069 −0.670 <0.001 −5.288 −0.471 −0.663 −0.279 <0.001 −18.618 −1.207 −1.453 −0.960 <0.001
37China−66.979 −4.811 −5.084 −4.538 <0.001 −63.542 −4.229 −4.472 −3.985 <0.001 −72.305 −5.788 −6.200 −5.374 <0.001
38Colombia25.487 1.495 1.064 1.928 <0.001 13.824 1.114 0.713 1.516 <0.001 39.262 1.896 1.419 2.376 <0.001
39Comoros−15.419 −0.813 −0.969 −0.657 <0.001 −13.760 −0.746 −0.947 −0.545 <0.001 −14.269 −0.760 −0.869 −0.650 <0.001
40Congo−6.931 −0.410 −0.500 −0.320 <0.001 −11.980 −0.634 −0.748 −0.519 <0.001 −2.571 −0.239 −0.342 −0.136 <0.001
41Costa Rica43.455 1.843 1.609 2.078 <0.001 13.993 0.591 0.525 0.657 <0.001 81.502 3.173 2.741 3.606 <0.001
42Cote d’Ivoire−15.270 −0.974 −1.168 −0.780 <0.001 −14.881 −1.092 −1.328 −0.856 <0.001 −14.963 −0.756 −0.937 −0.574 <0.001
43Croatia−6.659 0.145 −0.264 0.555 0.474 −18.495 −0.620 −1.021 −0.217 0.004 4.232 0.771 0.357 1.187 0.001
44Cuba26.970 1.134 0.791 1.479 <0.001 47.845 1.511 1.189 1.833 <0.001 10.222 0.729 0.263 1.197 0.003
45Cyprus−5.585 −0.379 −0.473 −0.286 <0.001 −11.608 −0.702 −0.914 −0.490 <0.001 2.182 0.028 −0.099 0.156 0.651
46Czech Republic−71.761 −4.669 −5.529 −3.801 <0.001 −73.941 −4.850 −5.775 −3.915 <0.001 −70.806 −4.668 −5.480 −3.849 <0.001
47Democratic Republic of the Congo−3.776 −0.224 −0.304 −0.144 <0.001 −0.375 −0.101 −0.167 −0.035 0.004 −4.935 −0.286 −0.372 −0.201 <0.001
48Denmark−2.850 0.091 −0.174 0.357 0.486 11.165 0.555 0.258 0.853 0.001 −19.951 −0.587 −0.903 −0.270 0.001
49Djibouti0.286 −0.376 −0.521 −0.232 <0.001 −2.195 −0.479 −0.620 −0.338 <0.001 1.441 −0.285 −0.435 −0.134 0.001
50Dominica40.114 1.326 1.256 1.397 <0.001 37.017 1.210 1.119 1.302 <0.001 33.026 1.136 1.045 1.227 <0.001
51Dominican Republic1.664 −0.073 −0.337 0.191 0.573 −1.139 −0.212 −0.690 0.269 0.373 6.721 0.111 −0.041 0.264 0.145
52Ecuador9.434 0.691 0.442 0.941 <0.001 8.115 0.687 0.450 0.925 <0.001 11.862 0.713 0.391 1.036 <0.001
53Egypt8.930 0.390 0.356 0.424 <0.001 6.212 0.287 0.256 0.319 <0.001 13.391 0.557 0.512 0.602 <0.001
54El Salvador1.623 −0.119 −0.306 0.069 0.205 −7.075 −0.568 −0.890 −0.244 0.001 15.091 0.440 0.350 0.530 <0.001
55Equatorial Guinea−10.710 −0.510 −0.651 −0.368 <0.001 −19.258 −1.013 −1.273 −0.752 <0.001 3.719 0.148 0.086 0.210 <0.001
56Eritrea−15.875 −1.047 −1.186 −0.908 <0.001 −20.252 −1.339 −1.529 −1.148 <0.001 −4.624 −0.374 −0.444 −0.303 <0.001
57Estonia−61.106 −4.732 −5.227 −4.234 <0.001 −59.551 −4.761 −5.354 −4.164 <0.001 −64.200 −4.875 −5.344 −4.403 <0.001
58Ethiopia−44.034 −2.491 −2.662 −2.319 <0.001 −47.116 −2.668 −2.873 −2.464 <0.001 −39.946 −2.255 −2.415 −2.096 <0.001
59Federated States of Micronesia−34.393 −1.723 −1.849 −1.597 <0.001 −26.199 −1.289 −1.410 −1.168 <0.001 −40.328 −2.056 −2.231 −1.881 <0.001
60Fiji25.048 1.178 0.967 1.390 <0.001 27.600 1.216 1.016 1.416 <0.001 24.654 1.230 0.885 1.576 <0.001
61Finland−11.289 −0.444 −0.667 −0.221 <0.001 1.896 0.212 0.036 0.388 0.020 −23.446 −1.133 −1.407 −0.859 <0.001
62France−12.134 −0.400 −0.458 −0.341 <0.001 −18.534 −0.654 −0.793 −0.514 <0.001 −5.881 −0.179 −0.281 −0.077 0.001
63Gabon4.662 0.103 −0.018 0.223 0.091 6.645 0.146 0.065 0.228 0.001 −0.965 −0.069 −0.257 0.118 0.454
64Georgia14.420 0.541 0.272 0.810 <0.001 9.658 0.355 0.126 0.585 0.004 18.756 0.717 0.385 1.050 <0.001
65Germany1.008 0.469 0.246 0.693 <0.001 8.277 0.650 0.474 0.827 <0.001 −9.405 0.106 −0.187 0.400 0.462
66Ghana−3.956 −0.350 −0.477 −0.223 <0.001 −1.070 −0.299 −0.457 −0.140 0.001 2.449 0.057 0.009 0.105 0.022
67Greece1.048 0.050 −0.014 0.114 0.123 0.799 0.019 −0.045 0.084 0.542 0.761 0.073 0.002 0.145 0.046
68Greenland−6.682 −0.370 −0.476 −0.265 <0.001 −20.369 −1.109 −1.340 −0.878 <0.001 3.067 0.129 0.108 0.149 <0.001
69Grenada27.548 1.232 1.029 1.435 <0.001 3.555 0.458 0.075 0.843 0.021 83.321 2.577 1.900 3.258 <0.001
70Guam−45.456 −3.492 −4.224 −2.754 <0.001 −33.399 −2.084 −2.531 −1.634 <0.001 −55.967 −4.844 −5.853 −3.824 <0.001
71Guatemala−30.566 −2.093 −2.535 −1.650 <0.001 −21.607 −1.362 −1.723 −0.999 <0.001 −37.111 −2.654 −3.181 −2.124 <0.001
72Guinea−5.443 −0.339 −0.475 −0.204 <0.001 −1.498 −0.231 −0.374 −0.089 0.003 −10.203 −0.488 −0.622 −0.355 <0.001
73Guinea-Bissau−29.523 −1.596 −1.783 −1.410 <0.001 −29.331 −1.667 −1.878 −1.457 <0.001 −26.518 −1.341 −1.498 −1.183 <0.001
74Guyana37.366 1.355 1.046 1.665 <0.001 36.173 1.443 1.048 1.839 <0.001 39.750 1.254 0.940 1.569 <0.001
75Haiti19.893 0.842 0.744 0.940 <0.001 23.367 1.013 0.866 1.160 <0.001 17.824 0.707 0.646 0.768 <0.001
76Honduras13.799 0.080 −0.198 0.359 0.559 −0.859 −0.265 −0.475 −0.055 0.016 36.640 0.484 0.108 0.861 0.014
77Hungary−66.925 −4.065 −4.742 −3.382 <0.001 −64.592 −3.837 −4.430 −3.240 <0.001 −68.963 −4.292 −5.042 −3.535 <0.001
78Iceland−32.983 −1.057 −1.175 −0.939 <0.001 −29.684 −1.017 −1.178 −0.856 <0.001 −37.661 −1.115 −1.280 −0.950 <0.001
79India−13.762 −0.536 −0.660 −0.412 <0.001 −13.901 −0.475 −0.571 −0.379 <0.001 −10.155 −0.469 −0.679 −0.259 <0.001
80Indonesia−39.727 −1.912 −2.058 −1.766 <0.001 −41.372 −2.014 −2.187 −1.840 <0.001 −31.422 −1.414 −1.503 −1.324 <0.001
81Iran13.478 0.546 0.295 0.797 <0.001 12.096 0.509 0.279 0.740 <0.001 16.618 0.652 0.366 0.939 <0.001
82Iraq−47.971 −3.087 −3.377 −2.796 <0.001 −43.436 −2.759 −3.018 −2.499 <0.001 −54.267 −3.554 −3.911 −3.195 <0.001
83Ireland−15.086 −0.565 −0.761 −0.370 <0.001 −26.184 −1.091 −1.453 −0.729 <0.001 4.495 0.130 −0.018 0.278 0.084
84Israel29.734 0.356 −0.096 0.811 0.118 29.298 0.493 0.115 0.873 0.012 30.053 0.155 −0.457 0.771 0.608
85Italy−37.806 −1.542 −1.795 −1.288 <0.001 −42.264 −1.914 −2.177 −1.651 <0.001 −33.939 −1.182 −1.454 −0.909 <0.001
86Jamaica49.334 1.658 1.343 1.973 <0.001 65.546 1.873 1.334 2.414 <0.001 24.847 1.166 0.899 1.434 <0.001
87Japan18.230 0.921 0.817 1.024 <0.001 10.197 0.579 0.507 0.651 <0.001 27.160 1.295 1.147 1.444 <0.001
88Jordan−13.413 −0.912 −1.121 −0.703 <0.001 −0.877 −0.029 −0.051 −0.007 0.012 −28.806 −2.061 −2.540 −1.580 <0.001
89Kazakhstan−48.206 −3.577 −4.094 −3.058 <0.001 −46.692 −3.373 −3.850 −2.893 <0.001 −52.573 −4.008 −4.572 −3.442 <0.001
90Kenya1.419 −0.086 −0.233 0.061 0.238 12.178 0.355 0.183 0.527 <0.001 −8.524 −0.563 −0.703 −0.422 <0.001
91Kiribati−14.146 −0.598 −0.670 −0.526 <0.001 −24.167 −0.993 −1.117 −0.870 <0.001 −1.074 −0.196 −0.432 0.040 0.100
92Kuwait−4.534 −0.061 −0.117 −0.006 0.032 2.149 0.207 0.118 0.297 <0.001 −11.842 −0.360 −0.556 −0.165 0.001
93Kyrgyzstan−47.085 −2.382 −2.751 −2.012 <0.001 −40.727 −1.931 −2.261 −1.600 <0.001 −58.852 −3.359 −3.874 −2.841 <0.001
94Laos−32.871 −1.584 −1.701 −1.466 <0.001 −33.167 −1.573 −1.679 −1.466 <0.001 −33.025 −1.653 −1.802 −1.505 <0.001
95Latvia−41.423 −2.890 −3.303 −2.475 <0.001 −31.099 −2.611 −3.192 −2.027 <0.001 −49.674 −3.279 −3.671 −2.887 <0.001
96Lebanon8.621 0.396 0.361 0.431 <0.001 6.520 0.323 0.284 0.361 <0.001 10.250 0.457 0.418 0.496 <0.001
97Lesotho12.904 0.670 0.578 0.763 <0.001 16.230 0.729 0.579 0.879 <0.001 11.289 0.703 0.576 0.831 <0.001
98Liberia−17.119 −0.828 −1.035 −0.620 <0.001 −18.339 −0.959 −1.170 −0.747 <0.001 −13.551 −0.543 −0.747 −0.339 <0.001
99Libya17.284 0.741 0.673 0.809 <0.001 11.056 0.444 0.411 0.478 <0.001 33.826 1.332 1.233 1.432 <0.001
100Lithuania−47.842 −3.349 −3.858 −2.838 <0.001 −48.493 −3.631 −4.157 −3.102 <0.001 −48.086 −3.148 −3.675 −2.618 <0.001
101Luxembourg−6.809 −0.215 −0.327 −0.103 0.001 −10.999 −0.432 −0.540 −0.323 <0.001 −5.709 −0.077 −0.196 0.043 0.201
102Macedonia−0.982 −0.008 −0.047 0.031 0.678 −0.244 0.008 −0.030 0.045 0.679 −1.651 −0.021 −0.061 0.019 0.283
103Madagascar−12.057 −0.596 −0.672 −0.521 <0.001 −7.941 −0.360 −0.415 −0.305 <0.001 −14.583 −0.784 −0.890 −0.678 <0.001
104Malawi0.153 −0.418 −0.647 −0.189 0.001 14.368 0.144 −0.083 0.372 0.203 −13.592 −1.049 −1.298 −0.798 <0.001
105Malaysia16.685 0.449 0.339 0.559 <0.001 3.164 0.018 −0.172 0.208 0.847 35.040 0.974 0.783 1.166 <0.001
106Maldives−40.651 −2.037 −2.250 −1.824 <0.001 −33.213 −1.556 −1.715 −1.396 <0.001 −50.703 −2.815 −3.057 −2.573 <0.001
107Mali−28.485 −1.442 −1.659 −1.225 <0.001 −26.824 −1.353 −1.602 −1.105 <0.001 −30.630 −1.545 −1.734 −1.355 <0.001
108Malta−12.206 −0.148 −0.363 0.068 0.170 −14.035 −0.211 −0.385 −0.038 0.019 −12.604 −0.204 −0.494 0.087 0.161
109Marshall Islands−22.149 −1.361 −1.567 −1.155 <0.001 −32.532 −1.686 −1.822 −1.549 <0.001 −16.266 −1.231 −1.557 −0.905 <0.001
110Mauritania−35.008 −1.965 −2.156 −1.774 <0.001 −33.062 −1.911 −2.155 −1.666 <0.001 −37.553 −2.064 −2.217 −1.911 <0.001
111Mauritius−5.955 <0.001 −0.295 0.295 0.999 −14.964 −0.360 −0.704 −0.014 0.042 7.802 0.489 0.188 0.791 0.003
112Mexico4.368 0.326 −0.043 0.696 0.081 −6.273 −0.036 −0.407 0.336 0.843 17.910 0.713 0.336 1.093 0.001
113Moldova−6.416 0.074 −0.336 0.486 0.714 −13.379 −0.478 −0.836 −0.120 0.011 1.525 0.685 0.138 1.235 0.016
114Mongolia−53.422 −4.520 −5.291 −3.743 <0.001 −14.020 −1.099 −1.330 −0.868 <0.001 −69.981 −6.773 −7.858 −5.675 <0.001
115Montenegro1.741 0.069 0.056 0.082 <0.001 1.878 0.063 0.044 0.082 <0.001 0.881 0.053 0.039 0.068 <0.001
116Morocco9.513 0.431 0.393 0.468 <0.001 5.685 0.267 0.240 0.294 <0.001 15.483 0.681 0.620 0.742 <0.001
117Mozambique15.313 0.529 0.411 0.647 <0.001 17.373 0.648 0.535 0.760 <0.001 19.983 0.577 0.433 0.722 <0.001
118Myanmar−23.528 −0.869 −0.944 −0.793 <0.001 −21.745 −0.787 −0.865 −0.709 <0.001 −22.179 −0.808 −0.886 −0.730 <0.001
119Namibia−10.046 −0.631 −0.809 −0.452 <0.001 −8.798 −0.583 −0.757 −0.409 <0.001 −8.622 −0.570 −0.757 −0.382 <0.001
120Nepal−3.278 0.056 −0.262 0.376 0.719 2.461 0.288 −0.028 0.606 0.073 −7.507 −0.145 −0.491 0.202 0.397
121Netherlands−31.996 −1.599 −1.764 −1.435 <0.001 −28.690 −1.203 −1.321 −1.085 <0.001 −36.399 −2.067 −2.303 −1.829 <0.001
122New Zealand−31.326 −0.822 −1.421 −0.219 0.009 −27.960 −0.849 −1.436 −0.259 0.007 −35.417 −0.890 −1.535 −0.242 0.009
123Nicaragua−3.632 −0.228 −0.409 −0.046 0.016 −10.879 −0.767 −0.964 −0.570 <0.001 4.232 0.366 0.061 0.672 0.020
124Niger−28.859 −1.614 −1.832 −1.395 <0.001 −30.570 −1.758 −2.010 −1.505 <0.001 −26.264 −1.345 −1.518 −1.172 <0.001
125Nigeria−19.199 −1.143 −1.318 −0.968 <0.001 −17.416 −1.109 −1.307 −0.911 <0.001 −21.918 −1.194 −1.372 −1.015 <0.001
126North Korea−6.676 −0.287 −0.341 −0.233 <0.001 −9.133 −0.378 −0.424 −0.333 <0.001 −10.659 −0.498 −0.571 −0.424 <0.001
127Northern Mariana Islands−55.683 −4.148 −4.922 −3.368 <0.001 −16.670 −0.981 −1.260 −0.701 <0.001 −70.243 −5.838 −6.832 −4.833 <0.001
128Norway−16.129 −0.384 −0.596 −0.172 0.001 −14.935 −0.277 −0.510 −0.042 0.022 −23.330 −0.827 −1.019 −0.634 <0.001
129Oman4.628 0.205 0.124 0.287 <0.001 2.123 0.101 0.076 0.125 <0.001 2.420 0.103 0.055 0.151 <0.001
130Pakistan13.588 0.260 0.147 0.374 <0.001 17.216 0.418 0.300 0.537 <0.001 11.256 0.093 −0.023 0.209 0.110
131Palestine−6.057 −0.206 −0.238 −0.174 <0.001 −3.489 −0.128 −0.150 −0.107 <0.001 −12.683 −0.422 −0.499 −0.344 <0.001
132Panama9.629 0.448 0.169 0.728 0.003 12.047 0.583 0.423 0.744 <0.001 7.124 0.302 −0.180 0.786 0.209
133Papua New Guinea−33.681 −1.629 −1.746 −1.512 <0.001 −26.695 −1.206 −1.364 −1.047 <0.001 −38.621 −1.935 −2.016 −1.854 <0.001
134Paraguay48.563 1.575 1.354 1.797 <0.001 15.725 0.346 0.121 0.572 0.004 88.890 2.749 2.413 3.085 <0.001
135Peru−16.371 −0.781 −0.953 −0.609 <0.001 −18.986 −0.858 −0.988 −0.728 <0.001 −13.357 −0.700 −0.919 −0.481 <0.001
136Philippines190.856 1.316 0.107 2.539 0.034 175.645 1.039 −0.179 2.273 0.092 241.267 2.107 0.889 3.340 0.001
137Poland−47.909 −2.451 −2.856 −2.044 <0.001 −42.002 −2.023 −2.351 −1.693 <0.001 −53.679 −2.958 −3.446 −2.468 <0.001
138Portugal8.691 0.631 0.335 0.928 <0.001 −5.501 0.033 −0.300 0.368 0.838 27.336 1.307 1.022 1.592 <0.001
139Puerto Rico23.834 0.761 0.614 0.908 <0.001 29.975 1.209 1.061 1.356 <0.001 18.493 0.333 0.053 0.615 0.022
140Qatar−0.915 −0.049 −0.074 −0.024 <0.001 −2.979 −0.127 −0.151 −0.102 <0.001 −2.666 −0.322 −0.416 −0.228 <0.001
141Romania−2.319 −0.084 −0.143 −0.026 0.006 2.075 0.102 0.076 0.127 <0.001 −7.684 −0.329 −0.429 −0.229 <0.001
142Russian Federation−26.499 −1.568 −2.014 −1.120 <0.001 −33.817 −1.941 −2.383 −1.497 <0.001 −25.272 −1.521 −2.007 −1.032 <0.001
143Rwanda−27.563 −1.702 −1.942 −1.461 <0.001 −24.589 −1.594 −1.830 −1.358 <0.001 −27.309 −1.609 −1.889 −1.328 <0.001
144Saint Lucia26.887 0.713 0.503 0.925 <0.001 9.420 0.280 0.221 0.338 <0.001 37.191 0.973 0.707 1.240 <0.001
145Saint Vincent and the Grenadines10.513 0.744 0.418 1.072 <0.001 2.150 0.533 0.159 0.909 0.007 3.426 0.119 −0.058 0.296 0.179
146Samoa−29.618 −1.749 −1.933 −1.566 <0.001 −21.364 −1.101 −1.251 −0.952 <0.001 −34.408 −2.152 −2.368 −1.935 <0.001
147Sao Tome and Principe5.229 0.064 −0.003 0.132 0.061 −1.076 −0.032 −0.134 0.070 0.524 10.786 0.131 <0.001 0.262 0.050
148Saudi Arabia3.974 0.205 0.184 0.226 <0.001 2.717 0.146 0.122 0.170 <0.001 8.682 0.399 0.365 0.434 <0.001
149Senegal−24.148 −1.349 −1.573 −1.124 <0.001 −25.833 −1.486 −1.747 −1.225 <0.001 −19.669 −1.084 −1.260 −0.909 <0.001
150Serbia−1.160 −0.086 −0.146 −0.026 0.007 −10.382 −0.606 −0.731 −0.481 <0.001 8.550 0.417 0.324 0.511 <0.001
151Seychelles21.264 0.523 0.414 0.632 <0.001 13.555 0.110 −0.063 0.282 0.203 30.352 1.029 0.929 1.129 <0.001
152Sierra Leone−13.421 −0.749 −0.872 −0.627 <0.001 −18.198 −1.069 −1.242 −0.896 <0.001 −5.769 −0.288 −0.376 −0.200 <0.001
153Singapore−38.987 −1.374 −1.787 −0.959 <0.001 −30.130 −1.010 −1.523 −0.495 <0.001 −48.980 −1.891 −2.239 −1.542 <0.001
154Slovakia−37.259 −1.915 −2.121 −1.709 <0.001 −30.151 −1.486 −1.609 −1.363 <0.001 −43.955 −2.396 −2.698 −2.093 <0.001
155Slovenia−32.461 −1.609 −1.776 −1.441 <0.001 −29.799 −1.437 −1.749 −1.123 <0.001 −35.433 −1.739 −1.922 −1.556 <0.001
156Solomon Islands−33.033 −1.705 −1.795 −1.616 <0.001 −26.227 −1.193 −1.304 −1.081 <0.001 −38.303 −2.091 −2.241 −1.940 <0.001
157Somalia−10.495 −0.820 −0.981 −0.658 <0.001 −4.693 −0.637 −0.809 −0.464 <0.001 −17.587 −1.021 −1.179 −0.862 <0.001
158South Africa−9.211 −0.577 −1.145 −0.006 0.048 −2.765 −0.357 −0.842 0.130 0.144 −15.556 −0.805 −1.514 −0.091 0.029
159South Korea3.609 −0.322 −0.648 0.005 0.053 −13.445 −1.326 −1.791 −0.859 <0.001 20.322 0.435 0.145 0.725 0.005
160South Sudan−11.502 −0.778 −0.916 −0.639 <0.001 −6.562 −0.587 −0.734 −0.439 <0.001 −18.410 −1.030 −1.148 −0.912 <0.001
161Spain−9.064 −0.240 −0.351 −0.130 <0.001 −9.884 −0.275 −0.377 −0.174 <0.001 −9.827 −0.273 −0.410 −0.136 <0.001
162Sri Lanka3.644 0.134 0.054 0.213 0.002 1.927 −0.049 −0.141 0.043 0.284 14.376 0.666 0.431 0.902 <0.001
163Sudan14.619 0.668 0.604 0.733 <0.001 11.517 0.561 0.505 0.617 <0.001 18.767 0.812 0.727 0.896 <0.001
164Suriname44.523 1.363 1.170 1.556 <0.001 51.903 1.487 1.264 1.712 <0.001 31.581 1.233 1.068 1.399 <0.001
165Swaziland2.024 0.050 −0.271 0.373 0.751 8.815 0.210 −0.146 0.567 0.236 −5.086 −0.129 −0.428 0.170 0.382
166Sweden−21.578 −0.570 −0.923 −0.216 0.003 −22.929 −0.605 −0.971 −0.237 0.002 −22.721 −0.663 −1.009 −0.315 0.001
167Switzerland−7.694 −0.314 −0.372 −0.257 <0.001 5.803 0.132 −0.015 0.279 0.076 −23.675 −1.010 −1.131 −0.889 <0.001
168Syria−9.702 −0.601 −0.734 −0.468 <0.001 −11.364 −0.710 −0.853 −0.567 <0.001 −5.874 −0.379 −0.505 −0.253 <0.001
169Taiwan28.380 1.310 0.703 1.920 <0.001 32.427 1.394 0.711 2.082 <0.001 25.861 1.294 0.790 1.801 <0.001
170Tajikistan20.951 0.268 0.069 0.468 0.010 19.429 0.188 −0.034 0.411 0.094 17.959 0.236 0.051 0.421 0.014
171Tanzania−10.783 −0.742 −0.966 −0.519 <0.001 −10.671 −0.760 −0.956 −0.563 <0.001 −9.031 −0.631 −0.905 −0.356 <0.001
172Thailand−23.780 −1.923 −2.601 −1.239 <0.001 −36.433 −2.975 −3.868 −2.073 <0.001 23.666 0.511 0.302 0.720 <0.001
173The Bahamas−5.994 0.063 −0.207 0.333 0.636 0.425 0.191 0.099 0.284 <0.001 −10.400 −0.060 −0.469 0.351 0.767
174The Gambia−22.084 −1.192 −1.351 −1.033 <0.001 −22.031 −1.272 −1.475 −1.068 <0.001 −20.764 −1.028 −1.135 −0.921 <0.001
175Timor-Leste−8.322 −0.318 −0.455 −0.181 <0.001 −2.333 −0.027 −0.182 0.128 0.723 −16.726 −0.746 −0.887 −0.604 <0.001
176Togo−17.189 −0.952 −1.109 −0.794 <0.001 −14.130 −0.967 −1.172 −0.760 <0.001 −15.614 −0.612 −0.777 −0.448 <0.001
177Tonga−13.978 −0.675 −0.735 −0.615 <0.001 −12.523 −0.559 −0.613 −0.505 <0.001 −13.946 −0.761 −0.852 −0.670 <0.001
178Trinidad and Tobago73.595 3.217 2.522 3.916 <0.001 89.509 3.420 2.728 4.115 <0.001 49.287 2.817 2.004 3.636 <0.001
179Tunisia4.453 0.183 0.167 0.199 <0.001 4.510 0.180 0.160 0.199 <0.001 6.291 0.266 0.249 0.283 <0.001
180Turkey−4.198 −0.117 −0.273 0.039 0.135 13.771 0.784 0.609 0.960 <0.001 −23.465 −1.305 −1.579 −1.029 <0.001
181Turkmenistan49.829 1.866 1.660 2.073 <0.001 41.404 1.594 1.358 1.830 <0.001 58.536 2.136 1.939 2.334 <0.001
182Uganda7.245 −0.036 −0.236 0.164 0.711 30.255 0.743 0.511 0.976 <0.001 −13.041 −0.894 −1.085 −0.703 <0.001
183Ukraine−32.710 −2.339 −2.761 −1.914 <0.001 −19.735 −1.613 −2.016 −1.209 <0.001 −44.467 −3.128 −3.580 −2.673 <0.001
184United Arab Emirates33.989 1.320 1.228 1.411 <0.001 28.952 1.175 1.098 1.252 <0.001 46.874 1.674 1.512 1.836 <0.001
185United Kingdom11.018 0.893 0.635 1.152 <0.001 9.065 0.908 0.641 1.177 <0.001 11.624 0.837 0.576 1.098 <0.001
186United States−3.427 −0.046 −0.247 0.156 0.645 −9.073 −0.507 −0.718 −0.295 <0.001 1.354 0.438 0.196 0.682 0.001
187Uruguay14.666 0.597 0.477 0.718 <0.001 20.629 0.935 0.766 1.104 <0.001 10.553 0.346 0.167 0.525 0.001
188Uzbekistan5.954 0.277 0.220 0.333 <0.001 6.659 0.336 0.245 0.426 <0.001 4.335 0.178 0.145 0.211 <0.001
189Vanuatu−24.385 −1.178 −1.343 −1.013 <0.001 −15.132 −0.592 −0.723 −0.461 <0.001 −32.431 −1.737 −1.948 −1.525 <0.001
190Venezuela−5.479 −0.839 −1.222 −0.455 <0.001 1.209 −0.587 −0.994 −0.177 0.007 −11.266 −1.097 −1.560 −0.633 <0.001
191Vietnam−5.790 −0.072 −0.206 0.063 0.281 −7.583 −0.181 −0.298 −0.063 0.004 −6.086 −0.043 −0.203 0.116 0.582
192Virgin Islands, U.S.58.206 1.935 1.618 2.253 <0.001 130.464 2.954 2.217 3.695 <0.001 17.516 0.875 0.709 1.041 <0.001
193Yemen11.817 0.498 0.461 0.535 <0.001 10.135 0.452 0.413 0.492 <0.001 14.898 0.598 0.556 0.639 <0.001
194Zambia−18.643 −1.413 −1.683 −1.142 <0.001 −4.385 −0.808 −1.071 −0.544 <0.001 −33.386 −2.181 −2.691 −1.669 <0.001
195Zimbabwe24.168 0.786 0.218 1.358 0.009 37.611 1.146 0.412 1.886 0.003 4.828 0.174 0.050 0.298 0.008
Abbreviations: PC: percentage change; APC: annual percentage change. p < 0.001 considered significant.
Table 7. Percentage change and annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and SDI level.
Table 7. Percentage change and annual percentage change of disability adjusted life years of urolithiasis stratified by gender and SDI level.
Both Male and FemaleMaleFemale
PCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-ValuePCAPC95%CI95%CIp-Value
Global−35.862 −1.898 −2.117 −1.679 <0.001 −35.043 −1.812 −1.973 −1.650 <0.001 −37.959 −2.078 −2.383 −1.773 <0.001
Low SDI−16.723 −0.720 −0.851 −0.589 <0.001 −14.591 −0.569 −0.677 −0.461 <0.001 −17.297 −0.821 −1.013 −0.629 <0.001
Low-middle SDI−22.509 −1.053 −1.166 −0.940 <0.001 −20.969 −0.898 −0.985 −0.812 <0.001 −22.656 −1.185 −1.370 −0.999 <0.001
Middle SDI−43.070 −2.494 −2.705 −2.283 <0.001 −42.137 −2.376 −2.535 −2.216 <0.001 −44.517 −2.679 −3.004 −2.352 <0.001
High-middle SDI−50.297 −3.096 −3.413 −2.777 <0.001 −50.098 −3.004 −3.254 −2.753 <0.001 −52.281 −3.343 −3.748 −2.936 <0.001
High SDI−15.837 −0.480 −0.694 −0.266 <0.001 −17.428 −0.628 −0.821 −0.435 <0.001 −16.001 −0.381 −0.635 −0.127 0.005
Abbreviations: PC: percentage change; APC: annual percentage change; SDI: sociodemographic index. p < 0.001 considered significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Yang, G. Global, Regional, and National Incidence and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for Urolithiasis in 195 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031048

AMA Style

Li J, Zhao Y, Xiong Z, Yang G. Global, Regional, and National Incidence and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for Urolithiasis in 195 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(3):1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Juan, Yue Zhao, Zhuang Xiong, and Guoqiang Yang. 2023. "Global, Regional, and National Incidence and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for Urolithiasis in 195 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 3: 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031048

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop