Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Machine Learning and Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Course of Changes in Blood Lactate Concentration in Response to Graded Exercise Test and Modified Wingate Test in Adolescent Road Cyclists
Previous Article in Journal
Sex-Specific Disparities in Outcomes of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Mitral Regurgitation: A Multicenter “Real-World” Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Minimal Detectable Change in Resting Blood Pressure and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Secondary Analysis of a Study on School-Based High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/jcm12237232
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Two Different Self-Paced Training Modalities on the Aerobic Fitness Levels, Psychophysiological Responses, and Antioxidant Status in Physically Active Young Adults

by
Yusuf Soylu
1,*,
Peter Krustrup
2,3,4,
Magni Mohr
2,5,
Ersan Arslan
1,
Bulent Kilit
1 and
Łukasz Radzimiński
6
1
Faculty of Sports Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat 60250, Turkey
2
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, SDU Sport and Health Sciences Cluster (SHSC), University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
3
Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter EX12LU, UK
4
Danish Institute for Advanced Study—DIAS, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
5
Centre of Health Science, Faculty of Health, University of the Faroe Islands, 100 Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
6
Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7232; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237232
Submission received: 4 October 2023 / Revised: 31 October 2023 / Accepted: 3 November 2023 / Published: 22 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sports Exercise: How It Benefits Health and Disease)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aims to investigate the effects of self-paced high-intensity interval training (Sp-HIIT) vs. self-paced moderate-intensity continuous training (Sp-MICT) on aerobic fitness levels, psychophysiological responses, and antioxidant status to assess the relationship between aerobic fitness levels and antioxidant markers. Physically active young adults were randomised into Sp-HIIT and Sp-MICT groups. The intervention consisted of three weekly sessions during an eight-week period. Sp-HIIT consisted of performing two sets of 12–24 × 30 s high-intensity runs ≥ 85% HRmax followed by 30 s rest periods, while Sp-MICT consisted of performing 24–48 min of continuous running at 60–75% HRmax. Pre- and post-intervention testing included a maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) assessment during a 30-15 intermittent fitness test (30-15 IFT), as well as resting blood samples, which were analysed for oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde (MDA)) and activity of intracellular antioxidant enzymes (catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG)). The Sp-HIIT group showed a greater improvement in velocity of 30-15 IFT, VO2max, and MDA responses. Furthermore, the Sp-HIIT group demonstrated higher psychophysiological responses than the Sp-MICT group, except for anger responses. In conclusion, these results suggest that Sp-HIIT has a higher level of beneficial exercise-induced effects in physiological responses with greater perceived exertion in physically active young adults.

1. Introduction

It is widely known that physical inactivity is associated with numerous chronic diseases [1], and the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that all adults should perform regular physical activity [2]. The positive influence of systematic exercise has a multicomponent impact on human health, including decreases in coronary heart disease risks [3] and obesity [4], support in type 2 diabetes treatment [5], and improvements in sleep quality [3], as well as mental health [6]. However, the efficiency of different types of physical activity can vary depending on volume and exercise intensity. Therefore, scientific verification of applied training programs seems to be important for sports scientists and researchers.
The modern lifestyle allows people to devote limited time to physical activity. Thus, since the beginning of the 21st century, low-volume but high-intensity interval training has drawn attention and has been explored extensively [7,8]. Repeated high-intensity training could be a time-efficient exercise mode to induce positive adaptations in skeletal muscle metabolism and upregulate aerobic capacity in men and women [9,10]. Weston et al. [11] introduced definitions of the most popular strategies of interval training based on exercise intensity. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) includes efforts at an intensity exceeding 80–85% of a person’s maximal heart rate (HRmax), while sprint interval training (SIT) is defined as efforts at an intensity equal to or greater (supramaximal) than peak aerobic capacity. Moreover, moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) is widely used to describe continuous efforts performed at intensities lower than HIIT [12].
The effectiveness of the training forms mentioned above has often been compared. The first comparison, published nearly half a century ago [13], reported no differences in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) changes and physiological responses between continuous and interval training participants. However, more recent studies demonstrated that interval training could provide even more benefits in physiological adaptations when training volume is matched [9]. Even when interval training volume is lower, the adaptive response is comparable or superior to endurance training [10,14,15]. Ramos et al. [16] found that HIIT enhances vascular function more effectively than MICT. Furthermore, Milanović et al. [17] observed more significant improvements in VO2max following HIIT than after traditional endurance training, which is supported by Nybo et al. [15]. Similar tendencies were noted in psychological responses. It is well established that HIIT and MICT are beneficial for improving mental health [18]. Previous research has indicated that, after HIIT, participants experienced equal or greater post-exercise enjoyment than after MICT [19,20]. However, intense and extended exercise generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals, leading to oxidative stress and potential damage to cells, proteins, lipids, and DNA [21]. Monitoring antioxidant markers is essential to mitigate oxidative stress and protect potential adverse health impacts of high-intensity exercise. Furthermore, maintaining an optimal antioxidant status can help sustain performance and reduce post-exercise muscle soreness [22].
In recent years, an expanding body of research has uncovered the influence of self-paced or self-selected intensity training on psychophysiological responses, exercise performance, and health markers in individuals at varying activity levels, including sedentary, recreationally active, and highly active levels [23,24,25]. Several recent studies have compared the effects of various training durations of HIIT and MICT interventions on adults’ psychophysiological responses, performance responses, and cardiorespiratory fitness. However, a few studies have compared the efficiency of self-paced intensities of HIIT and MICT interventions. To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated this topic in physically active young adults. Therefore, the purpose of this research was twofold: (1) to evaluate the effects of self-paced high-intensity interval training (Sp-HIIT) vs. self-paced moderate-intensity continuous training (Sp-MICT) on aerobic fitness levels, psychophysiological responses, and antioxidant status in physically active young adults; and (2) to identify potential correlations between the aerobic fitness levels and oxidative stress and antioxidant markers in this population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The effects of Sp-HIIT vs. Sp-MICT on young adults’ aerobic fitness level, psychophysiological reactions, and antioxidant status were compared using a two-group, parallel research design. Pre- and post-intervention measurements included a skinfold measurement, 30-15 intermittent fitness test (30–15 IFT), serum oxidative stress marker [malondialdehyde (MDA)], and antioxidant markers [catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG)]. Twenty-four physically active young adults were randomly assigned to either the Sp-HIIT or the Sp-MICT group. Two 12–24 × 30 s high-intensity runs at ≥85% HRmax were completed by the Sp-HIIT group, followed by 30 s rest periods. The participants in the Sp-MICT performed 24–48 min of continuous running at 60–75% HRmax. These eight-week training interventions were performed three times a week, and two-day intervals separated each training session. All measurements were performed on a standard outdoor athletics track with a tartan surface between 3 and 6 o’clock in the afternoon, for similar chronobiological responses. They were told to maintain regular nutritional intake before and during the trial and were familiarised with the testing and training techniques.
Before the beginning of this study, we estimated the sample size using the G*Power software program version 3.1 (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany). Then, we added a partial effect size of 0.2, a power of 0.8, a p-value of 0.5 (2 groups and 2 number of measurements), and a correlation of 0.5, considering previous study findings of imposed vs. self-selected training [26]. We found the recommended total sample size to be 12 in this study. Twenty-four young male adults were randomly assigned to the Sp-HIIT (n = 12; age: 21.8 ± 1.3 years, height: 176.6 ± 5.8 cm, weight: 76.9 ± 10.6 kg) or the Sp-MICT training protocol (n = 12; age: 22.1 ± 1.6 years, height: 179.5 ± 5.9 cm, weight: 78.2 ± 12.2 kg). All participants were involved in team sports, including handball, basketball, and soccer, and had at least two years of experience with the training workload of four training units per week, which included core strength training, aerobic activity, and group exercise. Before this study began, written informed consent was acquired from the participants after they were informed of the research’s requirements, benefits, risks, and procedures.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

  • Physically active young male adults;
  • Age of 20–25 years;
  • Minimum of two years training (four sessions per week);
  • Exclusion criteria;
  • Non-attendance at training;
  • Acute injuries;
  • Dropped out of training.
A minimum of 10 h of fasting was allocated before their routine breakfast time (7:00–8:30 a.m.) prior to obtaining blood samples from each participant, which were collected into lithium heparin vacutainers and centrifuged at 5000× g rpm for 10 min at four °C to separate plasma. The plasma samples were collected and frozen at −80 °C until biochemical analysis. The spectrophotometric method was used to determine CAT [27], SOD [28] activities, and MDA levels [29]. Furthermore, GSH and GSSG concentrations were also determined spectrophotometrically, as described in a previous study [30]. After the blood collection was performed to analyse oxidative stress with MDA and antioxidant markers, the body fat percentages of participants, using the Holtain Tanner/Whitehouse Skinfold Calliper (Holtain Ltd., Crymych, UK) and Gulick Anthropometric Tape (Holtain Ltd., Crymych, UK), were estimated using the validated formula for Turkish athletes [29]. Following the anthropometric measurements, each participant performed the 30–15 IFT. This test, consisting of 30 s of running and 15 s of passive recovery, is an acoustically and reliably progressive test according to the procedures described. After the 30–15 IFT, the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) was estimated from the maximum speed (30-15 VIFT) reached in the last stage of the test [31].
Sp-HIIT and Sp-MICT interventions were performed on a standard athletics track three days per week for eight weeks, and two-day intervals separated each training session to maximize physical and physiological performance. A progressive training design was developed to increase final performance in both training programs. The Sp-MICT group’s total training duration was divided in half during the research period in accordance with the Sp-HIIT group. Two 12–24 × 30 s high-intensity runs at ≥85% HRmax were completed by the Sp-HIIT group, followed by 30 s of passive resting. The participants in the Sp-MICT group continuously performed 24–48 min of running at 60–75% HRmax because this type of training has been recommended for physically active young male adults to improve their physical fitness and health profiles [32,33,34]. Detailed information about training is summarized in Table 1.
The first part of each training session comprised a 15 min standardized warm-up, which included 10 min of running and 5 min of static and dynamic stretching activities. The participants were allowed to change and maintain their pace during each training session without any guidance on their activity intensity. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was determined using the category level (CR-20) Borg scale immediately after each session [35]. The Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS) was used to determine mood profiles [36,37] within 10 min before and after the training sessions. The Table 1 shows the average after 3 exercise sessions per week obtained from the BRUMS. The validated and reliable scale consists of 19 items and 4 sub-scales (e.g., fatigue, depression, anger, and vigour) scored on a 5-point Likert scale [38]. Using the responses to a question of “How do you feel right now?”, participants indicated what feelings they experienced (in relation to fatigue, depression, anger, and vigour) based on the 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 1 = a little, 2 = moderate, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = extreme) (Table 1).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were represented as means ± SD. A two-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test for interactions and the main effects of time and type of group on aerobic fitness levels, psychophysiological responses, and antioxidant status. Correlations between aerobic fitness levels and pro/antioxidant markers were performed using Pearson’s (r) or Spearman’s (rho) correlation coefficient. The correlations were considered trivial (<0.1), small (0.1 to <0.3), moderate (0.3 to <0.5), large (0.5 to <0.7), very large (0.7 to <0.9), and extremely large (0.9–1.0) [39]. SPSS version 24.0 was used to conduct all statistical analyses (SPSS, Version 24.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at the level of p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

The weekly RPE and mood responses are demonstrated in Table 1. Overall, during the 8-week self-paced training period, the Sp-HIIT group showed higher RPE responses than those in the Sp-MICT group (p ≤ 0.05, d = ranging from 7.6 to 17.4). Moreover, the Sp-HIIT group also showed higher depression responses than those in the Sp-MICT group (p ≤ 0.05, d = ranging from 0.2 to 4.1). In contrast, the vigour responses from the Sp-MICT were significantly higher than those from the Sp-HIIT sessions (p ≤ 0.05, d = ranging from 0.2 to 1.3).
The Sp-HIIT and Sp-MICT interventions demonstrated similar anthropometrics, performance responses, and antioxidant status improvements except for 30-15 VFIT, VO2max, and MDA responses (Table 2). The Sp-HIIT showed a greater improvement in the 30-15 VIFT (14.7%, p ≤ 0.05, d = 3.20 [very large effect]), VO2max (12.2%, p ≤ 0.05, d = 3.15 [very large effect]), and MDA (11.2%, p ≤ 0.05, d = 3.59 [very large effect]) compared with the Sp-MICT group.
Table 3 demonstrates the correlations between aerobic fitness levels, oxidative stresses, and antioxidant markers during 8-week Sp-HIIT and Sp-MICT interventions. No significant relationship was found in the oxidative stresses and antioxidant markers in relation to the aerobic fitness levels of participants between pre- and post-training results.

4. Discussion

The main findings in our study were that both the Sp-HIIT and the Sp-MICT interventions improved body composition, aerobic fitness, and circulatory antioxidant status. However, the Sp-HIIT intervention caused greater improvements in the 30-15 VIFT, VO2max, and MDA responses, but with higher rating of perceived exertion (RPE), vigour, and depression scores, compared to Sp-MICT. Furthermore, no significant training-induced changes were found in serum oxidative stresses and antioxidant markers.
The methods for rating psychophysiological responses, such as RPE scores and mood profiles, are validated, cheap, and practical tools for measuring athletes’ physical fatigue and psychological status. Our results are consistent with the results of recent studies comparing HIIT and MICT conducted on a similar population consisting of healthy active men [40,41]. Considering the results of these studies, the HIIT intervention induced higher negative changes in mood profiles compared to the MICT. In addition to these supporting findings, the physical tiredness after a training session induced increased adverse feelings, such as anxiety, anger, and depression [42,43]. Furthermore, in a similar study, the results of RPE scores demonstrated a negative correlation with psychological responses, regardless of the participants’ physical activity levels [40]. Considering these study results, from a practical point of view, coaches and sports scientists should monitor physiological and psychological responses to observe exercise-induced implications during HIIT. The nature of HIIT and MICT might explain differences in mood state responses. While HIIT included running intervals of different durations, the MICT included prolonged exercise and had a monotonous nature, which may have affected the results. Furthermore, there could be other influencing factors, such as different types of training (imposed or self-paced exercise), participants’ training duration, and characteristics (sex, age, and type of training intervention), as previously stated [15,34].
Psychological responses to interval training were evaluated as important factors that affect exercise performance [42]. Therefore, some studies have shown an increase in negative results due to training [44,45], while others have shown an increase in positive results [46]. The HIIT intervention induced higher negative changes in mood profiles than MICT. Our results are consistent with previous studies. In dual-mode theory, HIIT may involve higher perceptual responses that override cognitive processes influencing emotional responses [44,47,48]. In addition to these supportive findings, physical fatigue after a training session increased negative emotions, such as anxiety, anger, and depression. The nature of HIIT and MICT may explain the differences in mood responses. HIIT involves running intervals of different durations, whereas MICT involves prolonged exercise and has a monotonous structure, which may have influenced cognitive processes that affect emotional responses. Nonetheless, high-intensity exercise can decrease the willingness to participate in training and pose challenges in devising exercise prescriptions.
Regarding the effect of the Sp-HIIT and Sp-MICT interventions on body composition, this study demonstrated significantly favourable effects on body weight and fat percentage. No significant differences were observed between training interventions, which confirms other findings in untrained hypertensive women [49], but contrasts findings in sedentary males [15]. However, none of these studies controlled for altered nutritional habits, which is a limitation. Furthermore, this study also demonstrated upregulated performance in the 30-15 VIFT and VO2max in Sp-HIIT compared to Sp-MICT after an 8-week intervention. These findings support previous research comparing HIIT and MICT interventions with different training durations ranging from 4 to 12 weeks in a variety of populations, such as healthy [32], recreationally active [13], and untrained young adults [15]. In a similar study, Hottenrott et al. [33] reported greater increases in VIFT and VO2max following a 12-week HIIT intervention compared with MICT in recreationally active adults. Similarly, an 8-week HIIT intervention resulted in an 11% increase in VO2max in healthy men [50] and an 11% improvement in young women [51], which is of similar magnitude to that reported by Nybo et al. [15] in healthy males and by Kristiansen et al. [52] in a frail patient with coronary heart disease after 12 weeks of HIIT. In contrast to these results which support our findings, VO2max has been shown to increase by 20% after a 12-week Sp-MICT training program compared with Sp-HIIT in inactive women [11]. From a practical point of view, our findings speak in favour of Sp-HIIT being a feasible, practical, and efficient training method to improve VO2max in physically active adults. However, there is still no consensus on which type of self-paced training intervention is optimal for improving aerobic fitness and body composition because of the lack of literature.
This study measured circulatory oxidative stresses and antioxidant markers by determining resting serum MDA, CAT, SOD, GSH, and GSSG values prior to and after the intervention. We demonstrated a higher level of serum MDA as well as performance in the 30-15 VFIT and VO2max after 8 weeks of Sp-HIIT compared to Sp-MICT. In contrast to our study results, some studies have found an increase in serum SOD and CAT activity and a decrease in MDA levels in untrained men after an 8-week aerobic training intervention [53,54]. Moreover, our findings agree with Knez et al. [55], who found that the systemic MDA concentration increases progressively during this type of intervention. In addition to these findings, a recent study reported that long-term [56] and short-term [57] HIIT induced an increase in oxidative stress markers, such as MDA levels, in highly trained men. The analysis of circulatory MDA markers of peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in individuals with long-term exposure to metabolic oxidative stresses induced by exercise training may indicate altered fatigue patterns and, consequently, the overload of adaptive stress mechanisms and depression. Although similar training intervention protocols were used in these studies, some important confounding factors, such as the population’s physical activity levels, age, and training intensity, may explain the diverging results.
Our study demonstrated that 8 weeks of Sp-HIIT provoked higher increases in 30-15 VFIT and VO2max responses than Sp-MICT, but showed no statistical associations between aerobic fitness levels, such as in 30-15 VFIT, VO2max and circulatory antioxidant markers, which is in line with the findings of other studies [58]. In contrast to our study results, Peserico et al. [59] recently found strong correlations between GSSG and indicators of aerobic fitness levels, such as peak velocity and 5 km running time, in untrained men. In addition, an earlier study found that systemic GSH values were correlated with training volume and VO2max in competitive triathletes [51]. Another recent study found a significant relationship between VO2max and the total antioxidant status of professional soccer players during their competitive season [60]. As a result of improved VO2max, increased reactive oxygen species’ production is associated with increased erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity and glutathione concentration, both of which protect the organism against lipid peroxidation and cell membrane damage [61]. Genetic background, physical activity levels, and the general characteristics of participants may explain the differences between studies about antioxidant markers and aerobic fitness levels.
This study has strengths and limitations. The applied training modalities were designed according to the suggested physical activity guidelines to improve health conditions for adults. Furthermore, this study is the first to compare the effects of self-paced training on aerobic fitness levels, psychophysiological responses, and antioxidant status in physically active young adults. However, several limitations must be addressed. The main limitation of this study is the lack of direct measurements of aerobic capacity. Another important limitation is the lack of control over the nutritional habits of the participants, which affects physical performance in relation to body composition and blood profiles. Finally, the sample size is too small to generalize the findings, and no inactive control group was included.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, both self-paced high-intensity interval and continuous moderate-intensity training in an 8-week period demonstrated similar improvements in antropometric variables and antioxidant status, while adaptations in 30-15 VFIT, VO2max, and serum MDA were in favour of high-intensity interval training. However, Sp-HIIT induced an increase in adverse feelings, such as in the RPE and depression responses, compared to Sp-MICT.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S., E.A. and B.K.; methodology, Y.S., E.A. and B.K.; formal analysis, Y.S., E.A. and B.K.; investigation, Y.S., E.A. and B.K.; resources, Y.S., E.A. and B.K.; data curation, Y.S., E.A. and B.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S., P.K., M.M., E.A., B.K. and Ł.R.; writing—review and editing, Y.S., P.K., M.M., E.A., B.K. and Ł.R.; supervision, Y.S., P.K., M.M., E.A., B.K. and Ł.R.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S., E.A. and B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University Ethics Committee (E-33490967-044-94834, 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions generated for this study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, I.M.; Shiroma, E.J.; Lobelo, F.; Puska, P.; Blair, S.N.; Katzmarzyk, P.T. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012, 380, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bull, F.C.; Al-Ansari, S.S.; Biddle, S.; Borodulin, K.; Buman, M.P.; Cardon, G.; Carty, C.; Chaput, J.P.; Chastin, S.; Chou, R.; et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stanton, R.; To, Q.G.; Khalesi, S.; Williams, S.L.; Alley, S.J.; Thwaite, T.L.; Fenning, A.S.; Vandelanotte, C. Depression, Anxiety and Stress during COVID-19: Associations with Changes in Physical Activity, Sleep, Tobacco and Alcohol Use in Australian Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, B.Y.; Choi, D.H.; Jung, C.H.; Kang, S.K.; Mok, J.O.; Kim, C.H. Obesity and Physical Activity. J. Obes. Metab. Syndr. 2017, 26, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Najafipour, F.; Mobasseri, M.; Yavari, A.; Nadrian, H.; Aliasgarzadeh, A.; Mashinchi Abbasi, N.; Niafar, M.; Houshyar Gharamaleki, J.; Sadra, V. Effect of regular exercise training on changes in HbA1c, BMI and VO 2 max among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An 8-year trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2017, 5, e000414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Paluska, S.A.; Schwenk, T.L. Physical activity and mental health: Current concepts. Sports Med. 2000, 29, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Burgomaster, K.A.; Hughes, S.C.; Heigenhauser, G.J.F.; Bradwell, S.N.; Gibala, M.J. Six sessions of sprint interval training increases muscle oxidative potential and cycle endurance capacity in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 98, 1985–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gibala, M.J.; Little, J.P.; van Essen, M.; Wilkin, G.P.; Burgomaster, K.A.; Safdar, A.; Raha, S.; Tarnopolsky, M.A. Short-term sprint interval versus traditional endurance training: Similar initial adaptations in human skeletal muscle and exercise performance. J. Physiol. 2006, 575, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gibala, M.J. Physiological basis of interval training for performance enhancement. Exp. Physiol. 2021, 106, 2324–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iaia, F.M.; Ermanno, R.; Bangsbo, J. High-Intensity Training in Football. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2009, 4, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Weston, K.S.; Wisløff, U.; Coombes, J.S. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2014, 48, 1227–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. MacInnis, M.J.; Gibala, M.J. Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 2915–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Eddy, D.O.; Sparks, K.L.; Adelizi, D.A. The effects of continuous and interval training in women and men. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1977, 37, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nordsborg, N.B.; Connolly, L.; Weihe, P.; Iuliano, E.; Krustrup, P.; Saltin, B.; Mohr, M. Oxidative capacity and glycogen content increase more in arm than leg muscle in sedentary women after intense training. J. Appl. Physiol. 2015, 119, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nybo, L.; Sundstrup, E.; Jakobsen, M.D.; Mohr, M.; Hornstrup, T.; Simonsen, L.; Bülow, J.; Randers, M.B.; Nielsen, J.J.; Aagaard, P.; et al. High-Intensity Training versus Traditional Exercise Interventions for Promoting Health. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2010, 42, 1951–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ramos, J.S.; Dalleck, L.C.; Tjonna, A.E.; Beetham, K.S.; Coombes, J.S. The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Vascular Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2015, 45, 679–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Milanović, Z.; Sporiš, G.; Weston, M. Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) and Continuous Endurance Training for VO2max Improvements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. Sports Med. 2015, 45, 1469–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Reed, J.L.; Terada, T.; Cotie, L.M.; Tulloch, H.E.; Leenen, F.H.; Mistura, M.; Hans, H.; Wang, H.W.; Vidal-Almela, S.; Reid, R.D.; et al. The effects of high-intensity interval training, Nordic walking and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training on functional capacity, depression and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial (CRX study). Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2022, 70, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stork, M.J.; Banfield, L.E.; Gibala, M.J.; Martin Ginis, K.A. A scoping review of the psychological responses to interval exercise: Is interval exercise a viable alternative to traditional exercise? Health Psychol. Rev. 2017, 11, 324–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stork, M.J.; Gibala, M.J.; Martin Ginis, K.A. Psychological and Behavioral Responses to Interval and Continuous Exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2018, 50, 2110–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Finaud, J.; Lac, G.; Filaire, E. Oxidative Stress. Sports Med. 2006, 36, 327–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Thirupathi, A.; Pinho, R.A.; Ugbolue, U.C.; He, Y.; Meng, Y.; Gu, Y. Effect of Running Exercise on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers: A Systematic Review. Front. Physiol. 2021, 11, 610112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Farney, T.M.; McCarthy, C.G.; Canale, R.E.; Schilling, B.K.; Whitehead, P.N.; Bloomer, R.J. Absence of Blood Oxidative Stress in Trained Men after Strenuous Exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2012, 44, 1855–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Waaso, P.; Gofton, N.; Zuhl, M. The Effect of Self-Selected Exercise Workloads on Perceived Enjoyment and Self-Efficacy in Sedentary Adults. Behav. Sci. 2022, 12, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brellenthin, A.G.; Crombie, K.M.; Hillard, C.J.; Koltyn, K.F. Endocannabinoid and Mood Responses to Exercise in Adults with Varying Activity Levels. Transl. J. Am. Coll. Sport. Med. 2017, 2, 138–145. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kellogg, E.; Cantacessi, C.; McNamer, O.; Holmes, H.; von Bargen, R.; Ramirez, R.; Gallagher, D.; Vargas, S.; Santia, B.; Rodriguez, K.; et al. Comparison of Psychological and Physiological Responses to Imposed vs. Self-selected High-Intensity Interval Training. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2019, 33, 2945–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Adamo, A.M.; Llesuy, S.F.; Pasquini, J.M.; Boveris, A. Brain chemiluminescence and oxidative stress in hyperthyroid rats. Biochem. J. 1989, 263, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ewing, J.F.; Janero, D.R. Microplate Superoxide Dismutase Assay Employing a Nonenzymatic Superoxide Generator. Anal. Biochem. 1995, 232, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ohkawa, H.; Ohishi, N.; Yagi, K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1979, 95, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sen, C.K.; Marin, E.; Kretzschmar, M.; Hanninen, O. Skeletal muscle and liver glutathione homeostasis in response to training, exercise, and immobilization. J. Appl. Physiol. 1992, 73, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buchheit, M. The 30–15 intermittent fitness test: 10 year review. Myorobie J. 2010, 1, 278. [Google Scholar]
  32. Helgerud, J.; Høydal, K.; Wang, E.; Karlsen, T.; Berg, P.; Bjerkaas, M.; Simonsen, T.; Helgesen, C.; Hjorth, N.; Bach, R.; et al. Aerobic High-Intensity Intervals Improve VO2max More Than Moderate Training. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2007, 39, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hottenrott, K.; Ludyga, S.; Schulze, S. Effects of high intensity training and continuous endurance training on aerobic capacity and body composition in recreationally active runners. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2012, 11, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Soylu, Y.; Arslan, E.; Sogut, M.; Kilit, B.; Clemente, F. Effects of self-paced high-intensity interval training and moderateintensity continuous training on the physical performance and psychophysiological responses in recreationally active young adults. Biol. Sport. 2021, 38, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Foster, C.; Boullosa, D.; McGuigan, M.; Fusco, A.; Cortis, C.; Arney, B.E.; Orton, B.; Dodge, C.; Jaime, S.; Radtke, K.; et al. 25 Years of Session Rating of Perceived Exertion: Historical Perspective and Development. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2021, 16, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Terry, P.C.; Lane, A.M.; Lane, H.J.; Keohane, L. Development and validation of a mood measure for adolescents. J. Sports Sci. 1999, 17, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Terry, P.C.; Potgieter, J.R.; Fogarty, G.J. The stellenbosch mood scale: A dual-language measure of mood. Int. J. Sports Exerc. Psychol. 2003, 1, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cakiroglu, A.A.; Demir, E.; Guclu, M. The Validity and Reliablity Study of the Brunel Mood Scale with the Adult Athletes (Turkish Adaptation). Int. J. Appl. Exerc. Physiol. 2020, 9, 126–140. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hopkins, W.G.; Marshall, S.W.; Batterham, A.M.; Hanin, J. Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009, 41, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Farias-Junior, L.F.; Macêdo, G.A.D.; Browne, R.A.V.; Freire, Y.A.; Oliveira-Dantas, F.F.; Schwade, D.; Mortatti, A.L.; Santos, T.M.; Costa, E.C. Physiological and Psychological Responses during Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training Sessions with Different Work-Recovery Durations. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2019, 18, 181–190. [Google Scholar]
  41. Martínez-Díaz, I.C.; Carrasco, L. Neurophysiological Stress Response and Mood Changes Induced by High-Intensity Interval Training: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Karageorghis, C.I.; Jones, L.; Howard, L.W.; Thomas, R.M.; Moulashis, P.; Santich, S.J. When It HIITs, You Feel No Pain: Psychological and Psychophysiological Effects of Respite-Active Music in High-Intensity Interval Training. J. Sports Exerc. Psychol. 2021, 43, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Costa, K.; De Lira, C.; Penna, E.; Andrade, M.; Fonseca, F.D.S.; De Lima-Junior, D.; Gentil, P.; Filho, A.S.; Costa, G.D.C.T. State of mood, motivation, and impulsivity of young athletes: A cross-sectional study. Hum. Mov. 2023, 24, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thum, J.S.; Parsons, G.; Whittle, T.; Astorino, T.A. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0166299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Olney, N.; Wertz, T.; LaPorta, Z.; Mora, A.; Serbas, J.; Astorino, T.A. Comparison of Acute Physiological and Psychological Responses between Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise and Three Regimes of High-Intensity Interval Training. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2018, 32, 2130–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Martinez, N.; Kilpatrick, M.W.; Salomon, K.; Jung, M.E.; Little, J.P. Affective and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval training in overweight-to-obese and insufficiently active adults. J. Sports Exerc. Psychol. 2015, 37, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ekkekakis, P.; Parfitt, G.; Petruzzello, S.J. The Pleasure and Displeasure People Feel When they Exercise at Different Intensities. Sport. Med. 2011, 41, 641–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jung, M.E.; Bourne, J.E.; Little, J.P. Where Does HIT Fit? An Examination of the Affective Response to High-Intensity Intervals in Comparison to Continuous Moderate- and Continuous Vigorous-Intensity Exercise in the Exercise Intensity-Affect Continuum. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mohr, M.; Nordsborg, N.B.; Lindenskov, A.; Steinholm, H.; Nielsen, H.P.; Mortensen, J.; Weihe, P.; Krustrup, P. High-Intensity Intermittent Swimming Improves Cardiovascular Health Status for Women with Mild Hypertension. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 728289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Murawska-Cialowicz, E.; Wolanski, P.; Zuwala-Jagiello, J.; Feito, Y.; Petr, M.; Kokstejn, J.; Stastny, P.; Goliński, D. Effect of HIIT with Tabata Protocol on Serum Irisin, Physical Performance, and Body Composition in Men. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mazurek, K.; Zmijewski, P.; Krawczyk, K.; Czajkowska, A.; Kęska, A.; Kapuscinski, P.; Mazurek, T. High intensity interval and moderate continuous cycle training in a physical education programme improves health-related fitness in young females. Biol. Sport 2016, 33, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kristiansen, J.; Sjúrðarson, T.; Grove, E.L.; Rasmussen, J.; Kristensen, S.D.; Hvas, A.-M.; Mohr, M. Feasibility and impact of whole-body high-intensity interval training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: A randomised controlled trial. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Azizbeigi, K.; Stannard, S.R.; Atashak, S.; Mosalman Haghighi, M. Antioxidant enzymes and oxidative stress adaptation to exercise training: Comparison of endurance, resistance, and concurrent training in untrained males. J. Exerc. Sci. Fit. 2014, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vezzoli, A.; Pugliese, L.; Marzorati, M.; Serpiello, F.R.; La Torre, A.; Porcelli, S. Time-Course Changes of Oxidative Stress Response to High-Intensity Discontinuous Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Masters Runners. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Knez, W.L.; Jenkins, D.G.; Coombes, J.S. Oxidative Stress in Half and Full Ironman Triathletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sarkar, S.; Debnath, M.; Das, M.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Dey, S.K.; Datta, G. Effect of high intensity interval training on antioxidant status, inflammatory response and muscle damage indices in endurance team male players. Apunt. Sports Med. 2021, 56, 100352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. El Abed, K.; Ammar, A.; Boukhris, O.; Trabelsi, K.; Masmoudi, L.; Bailey, S.J.; Hakim, A.; Bragazzi, N.L. Independent and Combined Effects of All-Out Sprint and Low-Intensity Continuous Exercise on Plasma Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Trained Judokas. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zivkovic, V.; Lazarevic, P.; Djuric, D.; Cubrilo, D.; Macura, M.; Vuletic, M.; Barudzic, N.; Nesic, M.; Jakovljevic, V. Alteration in basal redox state of young male soccer players after a six-month training programme. Acta Physiol. Hung. 2013, 100, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Peserico, C.S.; Machado, F.A. Association between endurance performance, oxidative stress, and antioxidant markers during a running training program in untrained men. Sport Sci. Health 2022, 18, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ponce-Gonzalez, J.G.; Corral-Pérez, J.; Villarreal, E.; Gutierrez-Manzanedo, J.V.; Castro-Maqueda, G.; Casals, C. Antioxidants Markers of Professional Soccer Players During the Season and their Relationship with Competitive Performance. J. Hum. Kinet. 2021, 80, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Margaritis, I.; Tessier, F.; Richard, M.J.; Marconnet, P. No Evidence of Oxidative Stress After a Triathlon Race in Highly Trained Competitors. Int. J. Sports Med. 1997, 18, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Data of the eight-week training programmes and the weekly rating of perceived exertion and fatigue, depression, anger, and vigour responses.
Table 1. Data of the eight-week training programmes and the weekly rating of perceived exertion and fatigue, depression, anger, and vigour responses.
WeeksSp-MICT (n = 12)Sp-HIIT (n = 12)
TrainingRPEFatigueDepressionAngerVigourTrainingRPEFatigueDepressionAngerVigour
124 min cont.
running		12.5 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.41.7 ± 1.01.6 ± 0.81.4 ± 0.4 *2 × (12 × 30 s),
30 s rest		16.2 ± 0.2 *3.0 ± 0.43.2 ± 1.3 *1.6 ± 1.00.9 ± 0.4
213.2 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.4 *17.1 ± 0.1 *3.3 ± 0.42.3 ± 0.9 *1.3 ± 0.40.7 ± 0.4
332 min cont.
running		13.1 ± 0.53.0 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.4 *2 × (16 × 30 s),
30 s rest		17.1 ± 0.2 *3.3 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.6 *1.3 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.3
414.1 ± 0.42.9 ± 0.61.1 ± 0.61.1 ± 0.41.1 ± 0.6 *17.3 ± 0.1 *3.2 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.6 *1.1 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.4
540 min cont.
running		13.6 ± 0.72.8 ± 0.41.4 ± 0.61.1 ± 0.51.2 ± 0.4 *2 × (20 × 30 s),
30 s rest		17.4 ± 0.1 *3.1 ± 0.32.2 ± 0.6 *0.9 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.3
613.4 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.50.9 ± 0.51.1 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.4 *17.8 ± 0.4 *3.2 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.4 *0.9 ± 0.30.7 ± 0.3
748 min cont.
running		13.6 ± 0.33.9 ± 0.50.8 ± 0.41.1 ± 0.51.1 ± 0.5 *2 × (24 × 30 s),
30 s rest		17.7 ± 0.3 *3.3 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.5 *0.8 ± 0.40.7 ± 0.3
813.7 ± 0.62.9 ± 0.60.8 ± 0.70.9 ± 0.61.0 ± 0.5 *17.9 ± 0.3 *3.4 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.6 *0.8 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.3
Sp-HIIT: high-intensity interval training; Sp-MICT: moderate-intensity continuous training; RPE: rating of perceived exertion; * p ≤ 0.05 for between-group changes.
Table 2. Effect of 8 weeks of training on anthropometrics, aerobic fitness levels, and antioxidant status of the participants.
Table 2. Effect of 8 weeks of training on anthropometrics, aerobic fitness levels, and antioxidant status of the participants.
Sp-MICT (n = 12)Sp-HIIT (n = 12)p
Values
Pre-TestPost-TestCohen’s dDescriptorPre-TestPost-TestCohen’s dDescriptor
Body weight (kg)78.2 ± 12.276.1 ± 11.8 *0.2trivial75.7 ± 8.973.2 ± 8.6 *0.3small0.540
Body fat (%)14.8 ± 3.713.2 ± 3.2 *0.4small13.9 ± 3.011.8 ± 2.4 *0.8moderate0.365
BMI (kg·m−2)24.2 ± 2.923.5 ± 2.8 *0.2small25.0 ± 2.424.2 ± 2.3 *0.3small0.462
30-15 VIFT (km·h−1)14.5 ± 0.515.1 ± 0.6 *1.0moderate14.3 ± 0.616.4 ± 0.7 *#3.2very large0.040
VO2max (mL·min−1·kg−1)40.7 ± 1.342.1 ± 1.5 *1.1moderate40.2 ± 1.545.1 ± 1.6 *#3.1very large0.043
MDA (mmol.ml−1)0.4 ± 0.00.4 ± 0.0 *2.0very large0.4 ± 0.00.5 ± 0.0 *#3.2very large0.025
CAT (U·mg−1 Hb)66.9 ± 11.152.0 ± 11.5 *1.3large64.5 ± 6.344.8 ± 4.5 *3.6very large0.191
SOD (U·mg−1 Hb)1.4 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.1 *0.9moderate1.4 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.2 *1.5large0.309
GSH (µmol·g−1 Hb)11.4 ± 0.713.5 ± 0.6 *3.3very large11.7 ± 0.714.1 ± 1.2 *2.4very large0.208
GSSG (µmol·g−1 Hb)8.9 ± 1.010.5 ± 1.1 *1.5large9.4 ± 0.710.9 ± 0.7 *2.1very large0.226
GSH/GSSG ratio1.3 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.1 *0.1trivial1.2 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.2 *0.5small0.755
Data presented as means ± SD. BMI: body mass index; 30-15 VIFT: maximum speed reached in the last stage of the 30-15 intermittent fitness test; VO2max: maximal oxygen uptake; CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; MDA: malondialdehyde; GSH: glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione. * p ≤ 0.05 for within-group changes. # p ≤ 0.05 for between-group changes.
Table 3. Correlations between aerobic fitness levels and oxidative stresses and antioxidant markers.
Table 3. Correlations between aerobic fitness levels and oxidative stresses and antioxidant markers.
CAT
(U·mg−1 Hb)		SOD
(U·mg−1 Hb)		MDA
(mmol·mL−1)		GSH
(µmol·g−1 Hb)		GSSG
(µmol·g−1 Hb)		GSH/GSSG
Ratio
PrePostPrePostPrePostPrePostPrePostPrePost
30-15 VIFT
(km·h−1)		−0.1−0.1−0.2−0.2−0.2−0.1−0.2−0.3−0.1−0.30.10.2
(small)(trivial)(small)(small)(small)(small)(small)(small)(small)(moderate)(trivial)(small)
VO2max
(mL·min−1·kg−1)		0.00.00.20.10.10.10.10.20.10.4−0.1−0.3
(trivial)(trivial)(small)(small)(small)(small)(small)(small)(trivial)(moderate)(trivial)(small)
Data presented as means ± SD. 30-15 VIFT: maximum speed reached in the last stage of the 30-15 intermittent fitness test; VO2max: maximal oxygen uptake; CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; MDA: malondialdehyde; GSH: glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soylu, Y.; Krustrup, P.; Mohr, M.; Arslan, E.; Kilit, B.; Radzimiński, Ł. Effects of Two Different Self-Paced Training Modalities on the Aerobic Fitness Levels, Psychophysiological Responses, and Antioxidant Status in Physically Active Young Adults. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 7232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237232

AMA Style

Soylu Y, Krustrup P, Mohr M, Arslan E, Kilit B, Radzimiński Ł. Effects of Two Different Self-Paced Training Modalities on the Aerobic Fitness Levels, Psychophysiological Responses, and Antioxidant Status in Physically Active Young Adults. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(23):7232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soylu, Yusuf, Peter Krustrup, Magni Mohr, Ersan Arslan, Bulent Kilit, and Łukasz Radzimiński. 2023. "Effects of Two Different Self-Paced Training Modalities on the Aerobic Fitness Levels, Psychophysiological Responses, and Antioxidant Status in Physically Active Young Adults" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 23: 7232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop