Next Article in Journal
Three Clinical Clusters Identified through Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Using Initial Laboratory Findings in Korean Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Resistance Training Program on Static Balance in Multiple Sclerosis Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

GenoType CM Direct® and VisionArray Myco® for the Rapid Identification of Mycobacteria from Clinical Specimens

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(9), 2404; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092404
by Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus 1, Mathis Steindor 2, Bernd Kölsch 1, Thomas Herold 1, Jan Buer 3 and Jan Kehrmann 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(9), 2404; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092404
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 22 April 2022 / Published: 25 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Infectious Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Clear study comparing two molecular assays for detection of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria from clinical samples. Although the sample size is modest for a the purpose of evaluating a diagnostic, the lack of studies for this evaluation makes this contribution worth consideration. 

Minor typos to be corrected, as indicated in pdf.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Comments and Suggestions for Authors:

Clear study comparing two molecular assays for detection of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria from clinical samples. Although the sample size is modest for a the purpose of evaluating a diagnostic, the lack of studies for this evaluation makes this contribution worth consideration. 

Minor typos to be corrected, as indicated in pdf.

Answer from the authors: We thank the reviewer for the positive and careful review. We have now corrected all typing errors indicated in the pdf.

Reviewer 2 Report

The present manuscript provides a comparison among the performances of two molecular diagnostic tests, focusing on the test ability to identify non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Overall, limitations of the study are properly identified and the article is well-written.

In reporting performances, only descriptive statistics are used. Some additional statistics may be required.

Author Response

Comments and Suggestions for Authors:

The present manuscript provides a comparison among the performances of two molecular diagnostic tests, focusing on the test ability to identify non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Overall, limitations of the study are properly identified and the article is well-written.

In reporting performances, only descriptive statistics are used. Some additional statistics may be required.

Answer from the authors: We appreciate the positive review of the reviewer. We have now additionally calculated whether the associations between the results of the assays and the culture results are significant using the Fisher´s exact test. The results of both assays, the GTCMd and VAM are significantly associated with the culture results with p<0.0001 for both assays (lines 186-188). We have now also added a paragraph to the Materials and Methods section describing the statistics performed in the study (lines 111-120).

Back to TopTop