Incidence and Risk Factors Affecting the Recurrence of Primary Retinal Detachment in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain
by
, ,
Cristina Irigoyen
1,2,3
,
Ainhoa Goikoetxea-Zubeldia
2,*,
Jorge Sanchez-Molina
1,
Asier Amenabar Alonso
1,
Miguel Ruiz-Miguel
1 and
Maria Teresa Iglesias-Gaspar
1,4,5 1
Donostia University Hospital, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain
2
Medicine Department, University of the Basque Country (EHU/UPV), 48940 San Sebastian, Spain
3
Division of Neurosciences, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain
4
Clinical Epidemiology, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain
5
CIBERESP ISCIII, Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4551; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154551
Submission received: 30 June 2022
/
Revised: 13 July 2022
/
Accepted: 2 August 2022
/
Published: 4 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Management of Vitreoretinal Diseases)
Abstract
:(1) Objective: To determine the incidence, visual outcomes and risk factors associated with the recurrence of primary retinal detachment (RD) in a tertiary hospital. (2) Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, and data were collected on all eyes diagnosed with primary RD between January 2017 and December 2020. A detailed database was generated with data on anatomic and visual outcomes, and surgical technique information, for all the cases. (3) Results: 570 eyes with primary RD were included. Mean annual incidence of primary RD was 21.8 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Mean follow-up time was 465 (±410.5) days. Mean time to redetachment was 114.4 (±215.8) days, with the median being 35 days. Statistically significant variables related to a higher risk of recurrence were: male sex (p = 0.04), type of tamponade (p = 0.01), surgeon (p = 0.035), inferonasal (p = 0.002) and inferotemporal (p = 0.032) involvement, complex RD (p < 0.001) and ocular comorbidity (p < 0.001). More satisfactory final visual acuity (VA) in patients not suffering redetachment was associated with shorter duration of central vision loss. (4) Conclusions: Sex, type of tamponade, inferior detachment, RD complexity, surgeon and ocular comorbidity were identified as prognostic factors for recurrence. Worse final postoperative VA was found in patients referring central vision loss for more than 4 days before surgery.
1. Introduction
Retinal detachment (RD) refers to the separation of the neurosensory retina from the retinal pigment epithelium below, which causes fluid accumulation between the two layers. Depending on the causal mechanism or the pathogenesis, four different types of RDs are defined: rhegmatogenous (the most common), tractional, exudative and combined rhegmatogenous/tractional [1,2].
Even with the correct diagnosis and the best treatment, the prognosis varies considerably between patients, as does the probability of successful primary surgery.
Causes of surgery failure mentioned in early publications include the extent of the detachment, the number of breaks, lens status (mainly aphakia), myopia, inflammation, retinal and choroidal atrophy, both vitreous and retinal haemorrhage, vitreous loss and a failure to identify all retinal breaks [3,4]. Some years later, in an article published by Rachal and Burton [5], more emphasis was placed on an incorrect surgical technique and other factors that prevented the adequate closure of all the retinal tears. From the analysis of 1088 cases, they identified the following factors related to failure (ranked by frequency): massive preretinal retraction (now known as proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)), preretinal membrane, undetected retinal tears, inadequate scleral buckle, new retinal tears, inadequate chorioretinal reaction, iatrogenic retinal tears, loss of buckle height and macular hole. Inadequate closure of existent retinal breaks accounted for 77% of primary surgical failures.
At present, PVR is considered one of the most important factors in primary surgical failure [1,6,7,8], being associated with a lower success rate, ranging between 45% and 85% [8,9,10]. Williamson et al. found 22% lower success rates in the presence of PVR. It is also worth noting that as the grade of PVR increases, so does the risk of surgical failure. Furthermore, in patients with PVR, inferonasal (IN) or posterior breaks and 4 quadrants RD are considered risk factors for redetachment, while the break position being temporal or superior is protective. On the other hand, in patients without PVR, it is difficult to determine the variables that may influence success; in this context, it is extremely important to decide the best surgical option based on the retinal characteristics observed before surgery [11].
The main objective of the study was to identify the incidence of retinal redetachment after primary surgery and potential associated risk factors. The secondary objective was to analyse variables that affect the probability of achieving final visual acuity (VA) of ≤0.30 logMAR.
2. Materials and Methods
This is a retrospective observational study in which medical data were collected on all eyes diagnosed with primary RD between January 2017 and December 2020 at Donostia University Hospital. Patients with complex RD, high myopia and other characteristics often used as exclusion criteria were included in the study; however, secondary RDs were excluded. Therefore, we have analysed the entire population treated for primary RD at a reference tertiary hospital. A total of 570 cases was included.
Inclusion criteria included patients with primary RD during the study period. We collected data for patients with anatomical failure after primary RD surgery (secondary RD following successful primary surgery, or when RD was persistent due to surgical failure), as due to the postoperative follow-up protocol of patients in our hospital we were not able to differentiate between patients with persistent RD related to primary anatomical failure and patients suffering RD recurrence. Exclusion criteria included patients with previous RD surgery.
Information was obtained retrospectively from patient electronic medical records and entered into Microsoft Excel. Variables studied included: sex, age, laterality, lens status, myopic refractive error, preoperative VA, duration of central vision loss, macular status, number of breaks, extent of RD, inferior break if present, ocular comorbidities, presence of PVR, complex RD, surgical technique, surgeon, type of tamponade, recurrence and date of recurrence if present, VA (at the last visit) and length of follow- up until discharge. RD was considered complex in the following situations: chronic RD (≥3 months), total RD, traumatic RD, previous glaucoma surgery, PVR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, current or previous uveitis, vitreous haemorrhage, high myopia (≥−6D), giant break (≥90), coexistence of macular hole, accompanying choroidal detachment, retinal dialysis, complex cataract, endophthalmitis and/or presence of any other ocular infection or tumours.
All the surgeries were performed by experienced vitreoretinal surgeons at the same hospital. The surgical technique was chosen at the surgeon’s discretion.
All data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 28.0. For continuous variables, results are presented as means, standard deviation (SD), median and range, while for categorical variables numbers (n) and percentages have been used. First, a descriptive analysis of the data was carried out to explore the characteristics of the patients. The effects of each variable on redetachment and final VA were assessed using univariate chi-square analysis tests for categorical variables and Student’s t tests for continuous variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. After that, logistic regression was executed comparing no redetachment and redetachment groups as well as those considered to have satisfactory final VA (≤0.30 logMAR) and unsatisfactory final VA (>0.30 logMAR). For each risk factor, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were defined.
The hospital’s Ethics Committee approved the study. All research adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.
3. Results
Over the 4 years of the study, the mean population studied was 652,862 and primary RD surgery was performed in a total of 570 cases, yielding an average annual incidence of 21.8 cases per 100,000 population (Table 1). By type, the average annual incidence rates were 21 cases per 100,000 for rhegmatogenous RD, 0.7 cases per/100,000 for tractional RD and 0.1 cases per/100,000 for exudative RD.
Table 2 shows the demographic characteristics and surgical techniques of eyes included in the study.
Eyes were followed up for a mean time of 465 (±410.5) days. Recurrence occurred in 28.9% (n = 165) of patients. For each group, the specific redetachment rate was 28.6% for rhegmatogenous RD, 44.4% for tractional RD and 0% for exudative RD. The average time between surgery and recurrence was 114.4 (±215.8) days, with a median of 35 days (Table 3).
In univariate analysis, statistically significant results in relation to primary RD recurrence were found for the following variables: sex (p = 0.04), detachment in the inferior-temporal (IT) (p = 0.032) or the inferior-nasal (IN) quadrant (p = 0.002), ocular comorbidities (p < 0.001), complex RD (p < 0.001), type of tamponade (p = 0.01) and surgeon (p = 0.035). Specifically, the rate of recurrence of RD was 21.6% in women and 33.1% in men. Further, the redetachment rate was 32.9% if the IT quadrant was involved, versus 24.7% if this quadrant was undamaged, and 36.2% if the IN quadrant was involved, versus 24.1% if it was unaffected. Lastly, redetachment was seen in 34.7% of cases with complex RD, and 36.8% of those with ocular comorbidities, while in the absence of these two risk factors, recurrence was seen in 20.5% of cases.
The most common causes of complex RD (>80 cases) were high myopia, PVR and vitreous haemorrhage, while among complex RD, the most frequent causes of recurrence (>45% recurrence rate) were endophthalmitis, previous glaucoma surgery, choroidal detachment, uveitis, giant break and complex cataract (Table 4). Ocular comorbidities were found in 269 patients, 79.5% of whom were considered complex RD. In the remaining 20.5% of patients with ocular comorbidities, the most prevalent ones were age-related macular degeneration, cataract and ocular hypertension. The most common ocular comorbidities were high myopia, glaucoma, epiretinal membrane, amblyopia and ocular hypertension. Regarding tamponade, the recurrence rate varied with the technique used: 25.5% with SF6, 27.3% with air, 33.7% with C3F8 and 44.4% with silicone oil (SO). No statistically significant relation was found when comparing different concentrations of each gas tamponade. Table 5 shows the results of the univariate analysis.
Forty-five percent of patients were pseudophakic. The mean time from cataract surgery to retinal detachment was 3.4 years (median of 2 years).
In the univariate analysis exploring variables potentially associated with redetachment, no significant relation was found for the following factors: age, laterality, lens status, pre-operative VA, myopia, duration of central vision loss, macular status, number of breaks, inferior breaks, superior-nasal (SN) and superior-temporal (ST) involvement, PVR, surgical technique, use of laser, use of cryotherapy, scleral buckling or sub-retinal fluid drainage through retinotomy.
PPV was the first-line treatment in 556 cases, while scleral buckle was used in 39 cases. The recurrence rates associated with PPV and scleral buckle were 28.98% and 25.6%, respectively, the difference not being statistically significant (Table 2). Further, regarding surgical techniques, the addition of scleral buckling to 23G pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or 25G PPV was not found to be significant.
After multivariate analysis and logistic regression with the aforementioned variables, sex and ocular comorbidities remained statistically significant, but not IT or IN involvement, surgeon, complex RD or type of tamponade (Table 6). Specifically, being male increased the risk of recurrence 2-fold (p = 0.002) and having ocular comorbidities by 1.9-fold (p = 0.015).
In univariate analysis for the impact of variables on final postoperative VA in patients not suffering redetachment, we found statistically significant differences for: older age (p < 0.001), myopic refractive error (p < 0.001), type of tamponade method (SF6, C3F8 and air achieving better VA than SO, p < 0.001), presence of ocular comorbidities (p < 0.001), duration time from VA loss to surgery (p = 0.004), detached macula (p < 0.001), number of breaks (p < 0.001), IT (p = 0.004) and IN involvement (p < 0.001), existence of inferior retinal breaks (p = 0.003), development of PVR (p < 0.001), complex RD (p = 0.001), use of cryotherapy (p= 0.01) and sub-retinal fluid drainage through retinotomy (p < 0.001). We did not find any association with lens status (Table 7).
Time from progressive central vision loss to surgery was one week or more in 29.8% and more than two weeks in 14.5% of cases (Table 5)
Figure 1 shows the percentage of eyes in the group of non-recurrence macula-off RD with final VA ≤ 0.30 logMAR correlated with the duration of central vision loss prior to surgery.
4. Discussion
The main objective of our study was to evaluate the annual incidence of primary RD in our setting and the factors influencing surgical failure. We found an incidence of 21.8 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year. This is similar to the rate found in a study in Denmark [12]. Other studies in Caucasian populations (including primary RD regardless of type) have found higher [13] and lower [14] incidences of primary RD than in our region.
Recurrences occurred in 28.9% of cases; considering that the mean time to recurrence was 114.42 days, with a median of 35 days, it is important to emphasize the need for close monitoring of the patient during the first 5 weeks.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was the first-line treatment in 556 cases, while scleral buckle was used in 39 cases. The recurrence rates associated with PPV and scleral buckle were 29% and 25.6%, respectively, the difference not being statistically significant. These results highlight the recent changes in trends in RD surgery, favouring with a growing tendency to PPV over scleral buckle as the preferred surgical technique [15]. In a Cochrane library systematic review comparing PPV and scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous detachment, the authors found a rate of redetachment after PPV of 21%, lower than our results [2]. This can be explained if we take into account that they only evaluated outcomes in cases of simple RDs, while no exclusion criteria were applied in our study. Indeed, nearly two-thirds (65%) of our cases of recurrence were in eyes classified as having complex RD. Excluding cases of complex RD and those with ocular comorbidities, the recurrence rate in our sample drops to 20.5%, similar to what has already been reported [2]. Our rates of recurrence after scleral buckle surgery were similar to the current published literature [2]. Other studies have also found lower recurrence rates with PPV, although it is important to note that they excluded traumatic, tractional and exudative RDs [2,16,17].
PVR is the main cause of redetachment described in the current literature [1,6,7,8]. This study did not find PVR as a statistically significant risk factor for RD recurrence. Only 14.4% of all cases presented with PVR, and the recurrence rate in this group was 32.9%. These results might be underestimated due to the retrospective design of the present study.
In our study, a considerable number of patients were classified as having complex RD, including those with macular hole (n = 18), complex cataract (n = 26), previous filtering glaucoma surgery (n = 13), chronic RD (n = 9), traumatic RD (n = 43), giant retinal tear (n = 21), total RD (n = 42) and vitreous haemorrhage (n = 82). Some of these factors have been shown to increase the risk of surgical failure, and this may explain our higher recurrence rates [18,19,20,21,22,23].
We observed higher rates of recurrence when using SO as tamponade. In total, 44.4% of retinas showed redetachment after the intraocular injection of SO intraocular injection. Notably, 91.7% of procedures in which SO was used were classified as complex RD; this may explain the high rate of recurrences. Stanley et al. evaluated the efficacy of SO in complex RD, finding rates of complete attachment that varied between 70% and 78% [24], while Scott et al. reported redetachment rates at 1 year after the injection of 1000 or 5000 centistokes SO of between 18% and 21% [25]. Even though these studies included secondary surgery after a first recurrence, which likely explains the differences in attachment rates seen in our study, the factors underlying our results still remain to be clarified.
In our study, the recurrence rate was significantly associated with inferior sector involvement, with redetachment being observed in over a third (34.3%) of these cases. This is a strikingly high result in comparison with the rest of the medical literature. In most cases, our patients underwent PPV, with a smaller percentage being treated with scleral buckling than in other series [15,26]. Some studies have suggested that scleral buckle surgery has some advantages in inferior RD [27,28]. Our low rates of buckling in primary RD procedures (7% of cases) could help explain our redetachment rates in eyes with inferior involvement.
Nearly half of the patients in this study were pseudophakic, with a mean time of 3.4 years from cataract surgery to retinal detachment (median of 2 years). Evidence of increased risk of RD after cataract surgery can be found in the literature, although time between cataract surgery and RD differs between studies. Risk of pseudophakic RD is considered to be higher in the first 6–24 months after cataract surgery, with the greatest risk during the first year. Some factors such as posterior capsule rupture or the surgery being made by a trainee surgeon have been shown to shorten the median time from surgery to pseudophakic RD. However, after the first 2 years, the risk of pseudophakic RD still remains higher for a decade [29]. Therefore, it would be advisable to inform the patients of a higher risk of RD after surgery, especially during the first years, and explain the visual symptoms associated with this pathology in order to achieve an early ocular assessment.
No retinal tears were found in 60 eyes (10.5% of cases) and among these, redetachment occurred in 22 cases (36.7%). This result might be overestimated due to the retrospective design of the study, because some clinical and surgical reports may lack the total numbers of retinal tears found at the surgery. It has been reported in the literature that the primary success rate decreases to 75% when no break is found [11]; this underlines the importance of devoting sufficient time to both diagnosis and the training of surgeons. In cases in which no break is found, the surgical success rate does not differ between PPV combined with scleral buckling and scleral buckling alone [30].
After multivariate analysis and logistic regression, the two variables associated with redetachment in a statistically significant manner were sex and ocular comorbidities. In our study, 63.5% of patients were male. The recurrence rate in male patients was 33.1% versus 21.6% in female patients. We identified male sex as a risk factor for recurrence after primary RD surgery (OR = 2, IC = 1.4–5.7). Gerstenberger et al. found higher incidence rates of rhegmatogenous RD in males in a population-based cohort study (OR = 4.16) [13]. Furthermore, the published literature has also identified higher rates of reoperation in males than females; Callaway et al. found that women were less likely than men to undergo reoperation after primary PR (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.62, 0.79, p < 001) [31]. The reason underlying these results could be due to biological factors, such as abnormal adhesions in the vitreoretinal interface and longer axial lengths seen in males [31]. Additionally, behaviour differences between sexes could interfere with adherence to postoperative positioning [32]. Future studies will have to be carried out to analyse the influence of sex on retinal redetachment.
Regarding the surgeon, the recurrence rate in our study varied from 16% to 39.7%. We did not find statistically significant differences in surgical technique between surgeons; this might be due to our small sample. Surgeons with the lowest recurrence rate were surgeon number 3 (16% recurrence rate), surgeon number 1 (20%) (who performed only 25 procedures during the 4 years) and surgeon number 5 (24.3%). Surgeon number 3 had completed a vitreoretinal fellowship training, and surgeon number 5 had more professional experience on RD surgery during their lifetime. The three surgeons with less recurrences use non-contact viewing systems for vitrectomy, compared to the contact viewing systems used by the rest of the surgeons. Recently, the PRO study reported no differences in anatomic success between non-contact and contact viewing systems [33]. Mazinani et al. examined the relationship between experience and success rates and observed that primary anatomical success rate became stable after 500 vitreoretinal procedures. However, none of the surgeons in this study reached 500 procedures in the period studied and there are no data of the total number of procedures they have performed throughout their professional careers [34].
The long period associated with visual symptoms before diagnosis reported by some of our patients merits comment. Notably, 29.8% of the eyes had experienced progressive central vision loss for one week or more before surgery, while as many as 14.5% underwent surgery after 2 weeks with central visual loss. This highlights the need to create care pathways for referral, integrating primary care and ophthalmology specialists, to improve early detection of RD in our population.
Furthermore, it is essential to increase awareness of the symptoms of RD in the population. Longer reported duration of central vision loss in macula-off RD was associated with a poorer functional outcome, hence the importance of shortening this period in patients seeking medical attention. As can be seen in Figure 1, in non-recurrent macula-off RD, the final VA tends to be lower when central vision loss is experienced for more than 4 days before surgery. This affirms the findings of Yorston et al. and emphasises the need for surgery within 72–96 h [35]. Grabowska et al. also affirms the importance of re-thinking our priorities in RD surgery, giving more importance to macula-off RD repair within 3 days [36], contrary to previous articles, which suggested less urgency when repairing macula-off RD [37].
One of the strengths of our study was the lack of exclusion criteria used in other studies on the topic, such as complex RD. Given this, it reflects the real population that experiences primary RD. We believe that this increases the external validity of the study findings. As for the limitations of the study, one of the most serious was its retrospective nature, as this led to difficulties in collecting some data. For example, we did not include the axial length of the patients and its relationship with risk of redetachment. Another limitation of the study was that, due to the postoperative follow-up protocol of patients in our hospital, we were not able to differentiate between patients with persistent RD related to primary anatomical failure and patients suffering RD recurrence. Therefore, we decided to include all cases with anatomical failure after primary RD surgery, based on the guidelines developed by the Australian New Zealand Society of Retinal Surgeons [38].
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, incidence and recurrence rates were comparable in this article with the current literature. The main risk factors for retinal detachment were male sex, SO tamponade, inferior RD, surgeon, ocular comorbidities and complex RD. The two only independent variables associated with redetachment after logistic regression were male sex and ocular comorbidities. It is advisable to audit our results in order to inform our patients about the risk of recurrence in retinal detachment surgery. Worse final postoperative VA was found in patients referring central vision loss for more than 4 days before surgery. Not only urgency in surgery but the prompt referral of patients to vitreoretinal services should be our goal to try to reduce the days of central vision loss and improve the visual outcome of our patients.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.R.-M. and C.I.; methodology, A.G.-Z. and C.I.; software, A.G.-Z. and M.T.I.-G.; validation, C.I., A.G.-Z., J.S.-M. and A.A.A.; formal analysis, C.I., A.G.-Z., J.S.-M., A.A.A., M.R.-M. and M.T.I.-G.; investigation, C.I., A.G.-Z., J.S.-M. and A.A.A.; resources, C.I., A.G.-Z., J.S.-M. and A.A.A.; data curation, C.I., A.G.-Z., J.S.-M., A.A.A., M.T.I.-G. and M.R.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.I., A.G.-Z., J.S.-M. and A.A.A.; writing—review and editing, C.I., A.G.-Z., J.S.-M., A.A.A., M.R.-M. and M.T.I.-G.; visualization, C.I., A.G.-Z., J.S.-M. and A.A.A.; supervision, C.I.; project administration, C.I.; funding acquisition, C.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the hospital’s Ethics Committee.
Informed Consent Statement
There were no informed consents for this study as it is a retrospective observational study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Steel, D. Retinal detachment. BMJ Clin. Evid. 2014, 2014, 0710. [Google Scholar]
- Znaor, L.; Medic, A.; Binder, S.; Vucinovic, A.; Lovric, J.M.; Puljak, L. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Cochrane. Database. Syst. Rev. 2019, 3, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dunnington, J.H.; Macnie, J.P. Detachment of the retina. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1935, 13, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, H.W., Jr. Evaluation of results of retinal detachment surgery. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 1952, 56, 439–448. [Google Scholar]
- Rachal, W.F.; Burton, T.C. Changing concepts of failures after retinal detachment surgery. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1979, 97, 480–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pastor, J.C.; Rojas, J.; Pastor-Idoate, S.; Di Lauro, S.; Gonzalez-Buendia, L.; Delgado-Tirado, S. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A new concept of disease pathogenesis and practical consequences. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2016, 51, 125–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilton, G.; Machemer, R.; Michels, R.; Okun, E.; Schepens, C.; Schwartz, A. The classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 1983, 90, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idrees, S.; Sridhar, J.; Kuriyan, A.E. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A review. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 2019, 59, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aaberg, T.M., Sr. Surgery as the primary management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A history reflecting my experiences and biases. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2010, 128, 1068–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pastor, J.C.; de la Rúa, E.R.; Martín, F. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Risk factors and pathobiology. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2002, 21, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williamson, T.H.; Lee, E.J.; Shunmugam, M. Characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and their relationship to success rates of surgery. Retina 2014, 34, 1421–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poulsen, C.D.; Peto, T.; Grauslund, J.; Green, A. Epidemiologic characteristics of retinal detachment surgery at a specialized unit in Denmark. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016, 94, 548–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gerstenberger, E.; Stoffelns, B.; Nickels, S.; Münzel, T.; Wild, P.S.; Beutel, M.E.; Schmidtmann, I.; Lackner, K.J.; Pfeiffer, N.; Schuster, A.K. Incidence of retinal detachment in germany: Results from the gutenberg health study. Ophthalmologica 2021, 244, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitry, D.; Chalmers, J.; Anderson, K.; Williams, L.; Fleck, B.W.; Wright, A.; Campbell, H. Temporal trends in retinal detachment incidence in Scotland between 1987 and 2006. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 95, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smretschnig, E.; Falkner-Radler, C.I.; Spörl, J.; Kivaranovic, D.; Binder, S.; Krepler, K. Primary retinal detachment surgery: Changes in treatment and outcome in an austrian tertiary eye center. Ophthalmologica 2017, 237, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryan, E.H.; Ryan, C.M.; Forbes, N.J.; Yonekawa, Y.; Wagley, S.; Mittra, R.A.; Parke, D.W.; Joseph, D.P.; Emerson, G.G.; Shah, G.K.; et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 2: Phakic retinal detachment outcomes. Ophthalmology 2020, 127, 1077–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryan, E.H.; Joseph, D.P.; Ryan, C.M.; Forbes, N.J.K.; Yonekawa, Y.; Mittra, R.A.; Parke, D.W.; Ringeisen, A.; Emerson, G.G.; Shah, G.K.; et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study: Methodology and overall outcomes—primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 1. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2020, 4, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, I.U.; Murray, T.G.; Flynn, H.W.; Feuer, W.J.; Schiffman, J.C. Outcomes and complications associated with giant retinal tear management using perfluoro-n-octane. Ophthalmology 2002, 109, 1828–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.K.; Tang, E.W.; Li, P.S.; Wong, D. Double peel using triamcinolone acetonide and trypan blue in the management of myopic macular hole with retinal detachment: A case-control study. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2010, 38, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, P.; Sharma, U.; Panda, S.; Balekudaru, S.; Lingam, V.; Bhende, P. Outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma drainage devices. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 66, 1820–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, M.; O’Doherty, M.; Beatty, S. The prognostic influence of chronicity of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment on anatomic success after reattachment surgery. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2007, 143, 1032–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orban, M.; Islam, Y.F.K.; Haddock, L.J. Timing and outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery after traumatic retinal detachment. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 2016, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sung, J.Y.; Lee, M.W.; Won, Y.K.; Lim, H.B.; Kim, J.Y. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A matched case-control study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020, 20, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azen, S.P.; Scott, I.U.; Flynn, H.W.; Lai, M.Y., Jr.; Topping, T.M.; Benati, L.; Trask, D.K.; Rogus, L.A. Silicone oil in the repair of complex retinal detachments: A prospective observational multicenter study. Ophthalmology 1998, 105, 1587–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, I.U.; Flynn, H.W., Jr.; Murray, T.G.; Smiddy, W.E.; Davis, J.L.; Feuer, W.J. Outcomes of complex retinal detachment repair using 1000- vs. 5000-centistoke silicone oil. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2005, 123, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, D.P.; Ryan, E.H.; Ryan, C.M.; Forbes, N.J.K.; Wagley, S.; Yonekawa, Y.; Mittra, R.A.; Parke, D.W.; Emerson, G.G.; Shah, G.K.; et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study: Pseudophakic retinal detachment outcomes: Primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 3. Ophthalmology 2020, 127, 1507–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starr, M.R.; Obeid, A.; Ryan, E.H.; Ryan, C.; Ammar, M.; Patel, L.G.; Forbes, N.J.; Capone, A., Jr.; Emerson, G.G.; Joseph, D.P.; et al. Retinal detachment with inferior retinal breaks: Primary vitrectomy versus vitrectomy with scleral buckle (PRO Study Report No. 9). Retina 2021, 41, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Churashov, S.V.; Shevalova, T.N.; Kulikov, A.N.; Maltsev, D.S. Surgical outcomes in inferior recurrences of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 14, 1909–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qureshi, M.H.; Steel, D.H.W. Retinal detachment following cataract phacoemulsification—A review of the literature. Eye 2019, 34, 616–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salicone, A.; Smiddy, W.E.; Venkatraman, A.; Feuer, W. Management of retinal detachment when no break is found. Ophthalmology 2006, 113, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callaway, N.F.; Vail, D.; Al-Moujahed, A.; Ludwig, C.; Ji, M.H.; Mahajan, V.B.; Pershing, S.; Moshfeghi, D.M. Sex differences in the repair of retinal detachments in the united states. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 219, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, K.; Shimada, Y.; Seno, Y.; Mizuguchi, T.; Tanikawa, A.; Horiguchi, M. Adherence to the face-down positioning after vitrectomy and gas tamponade: A time series analysis. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tieger, M.G.; Rodriguez, M.; Wang, J.C.; Obeid, A.; Ryan, C.; Gao, X.; Kakulavarapu, S.; Mardis, P.J.; Madhava, M.L.; Maloney, S.M.; et al. Impact of contact versus non-contact wide-angle viewing systems on outcomes of primary retinal detachment repair (PRO study report number 5). Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 105, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazinani, B.A.; Rajendram, A.; Walter, P.; Roessler, G.F. Does surgical experience have an effect on the success of retinal detachment surgery? Retina 2012, 32, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yorston, D.; Donachie, P.H.J.; Laidlaw, D.A.; Steel, D.H.; Sparrow, J.M.; Aylward, G.W.; Williamson, T.H.; Casswell, A.G.; Morris, A.H.C.; Jalil, A.; et al. Factors affecting visual recovery after successful repair of macula-off retinal detachments: Findings from a large prospective UK cohort study. Eye 2020, 35, 1431–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grabowska, A.; Neffendorf, J.E.; Yorston, D.; Williamson, T.H. Urgency of retinal detachment repair: Is it time to re-think our priorities? Eye 2021, 35, 1035–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ross, W.H.; Kozy, D.W. Visual recovery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1998, 105, 2149–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heath Jeffery, R.C.; Young, B.; Atkins, W.; Shadbolt, B.; Allen, P.J.; Essex, R.W. Analysis of time to failure after retinal detachment surgery. Retina 2020, 40, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Relation between duration of central vision loss and percentage of eyes with final visual acuity of ≤0.30 logMAR, in non-recurrent macula-off RD.
Figure 1.
Relation between duration of central vision loss and percentage of eyes with final visual acuity of ≤0.30 logMAR, in non-recurrent macula-off RD.
Table 1.
Annual incidence and 4-year mean incidence.
| Year | Population Examined (n) | Primary RD Cases (n) | Annual Incidence Per 100,000 Inhabitants |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 649,075 | 148 | 22.8 |
| 2018 | 651,201 | 162 | 24.8 |
| 2019 | 654,027 | 147 | 22.5 |
| 2020 | 657,145 | 113 | 17.2 |
| Mean population studied = 652,862 Total primary RD cases = 570 Incidence = 21.8 cases per 100,000 per year | |||
Table 2.
Characteristics of the study population expressed as numbers (n) and percentages (%).
| Characteristics | n (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female | 208 (36.5) |
| Male | 362 (63.5) | |
| Age (years) | <50 | 103 (18.1) |
| 50–69 | 306 (53.7) | |
| 70–79 | 106 (18.6) | |
| ≥80 | 55 (9.6) | |
| Laterality | Right | 310 (54.4) |
| Left | 260 (45.6) | |
| Lens status | Phakic | 298 (52.3) |
| Pseudophakic | 256 (44.9) | |
| Aphakic | 8 (1.4) | |
| IOL phakic | 8 (1.4) | |
| Pre-operative visual acuity (logMAR) | ≤0.30 | 178 (31.2) |
| <1.00–>0.30 | 105 (18.4) | |
| ≤1.30–≥1.00 | 80 (14.0) | |
| CF–NPL | 196 (34.4) | |
| Post-operative visual acuity (logMAR) | ≤0.30 | 333 (58.4) |
| ≤1.00–>0.30 | 116 (20.4) | |
| >1.00 | 108 (18.9) | |
| Myopia | No | 188 (33.0) |
| <3 Diopters | 80 (14.0) | |
| 3–6 Diopters | 49 (8.6) | |
| >6 Diopters | 100 (17.5) | |
| Ocular comorbidity | No | 299 (52.5) |
| Yes | 269 (47.2) | |
| Duration of central vision loss | 0 | 216 (37.9) |
| 1 | 4 (0.7) | |
| 2 | 15 (2.6) | |
| 3 | 34 (6.0) | |
| 4 | 41 (7.2) | |
| 5 | 35 (6.1) | |
| 6 | 36 (6.3) | |
| 7 | 24 (4.2) | |
| 8–14 | 59 (10.4) | |
| 15–30 | 44 (7.7) | |
| 31–90 | 26 (4.6) | |
| >90 | 9 (1.6) | |
| Macular status | On | 254 (44.6) |
| Off | 308 (54.0) | |
| Number of breaks | 0 | 60 (10.5) |
| 1 | 289 (50.7) | |
| 2 | 120 (21.1) | |
| 3 | 48 (8.4) | |
| 4 | 23 (4.0) | |
| 5 | 6 (1.1) | |
| 6 | 4 (0.7) | |
| 7 | 1 (0.2) | |
| 8 | 0 (0.0) | |
| 9 | 1 (0.2) | |
| Quadrants involved | ST | 329 (57.7) |
| IT | 289 (50.7) | |
| SN | 238 (41.8) | |
| IN | 224 (39.3) | |
| Inferior breaks | No | 363 (63.7) |
| Yes | 195 (34.2) | |
| No data | 12 (2.1) | |
| Proliferative vitreoretinopathy | No | 488 (85.6) |
| Yes | 82 (14.4) | |
| Complex retinal detachment | No | 262 (46.0) |
| Yes | 308 (54.0) | |
| Surgical technique | 23G PPV | 128 (22.5) |
| 25G PPV | 428 (75.1) | |
| Scleral buckle surgery | 10 (1.8) | |
| Laser | No | 134 (23.5) |
| Yes | 435 (76.3) | |
| Cryotherapy | No | 349 (61.2) |
| Yes | 220 (38.6) | |
| Scleral buckle | No | 530 (93.0) |
| Yes | 39 (6.8) | |
| Type of tamponade | SF6 | 373 (65.4) |
| C3F8 | 83 (14.6) | |
| Silicone oil | 72 (12.6) | |
| Air | 22 (3.9) | |
| Sub-retinal fluid drainage | Break | 516 (90.5) |
| Retinotomy | 53 (9.3) | |
| Redetachment | No | 405 (71.1) |
| Yes | 165 (28.9) | |
Table 3.
Characteristics of the expressed as mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum.
| Characteristics | Mean | Standard Deviation | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 61.14 | 14.29 | 62 | 0 | 95 |
| Follow up (days) | 465 | 410.55 | 360 | 23 | 1800 |
| Years from cataract surgery to RD | 3.44 | 4.43 | 2 | 0 | 25 |
| Days from primary RD surgery to re-detachment | 114.42 | 215.78 | 35 | 1 | 1225 |
RD: retinal detachment.
Table 4.
Relationship of each type of complex retinal detachment (RD) with recurrence. The table summarises all features of the methodology identified as complicating factors. The number (n) and percentage (%) of cases of no redetachment and redetachment within each characteristic are indicated, as are the total numbers of patients with each characteristic.
Table 4.
Relationship of each type of complex retinal detachment (RD) with recurrence. The table summarises all features of the methodology identified as complicating factors. The number (n) and percentage (%) of cases of no redetachment and redetachment within each characteristic are indicated, as are the total numbers of patients with each characteristic.
| Cause of Complex RD | No Redetachment n(%) | Redetachment n(%) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| High myopia (≥−6D) | 66 (66.0) | 34 (34.0) | 100 |
| Proliferative vitreoretinopathy | 55 (67.1) | 27 (32.9) | 82 |
| Vitreous haemorrhage | 59 (72.0) | 23 (28.0) | 82 |
| Traumatic RD | 30 (69.8) | 13 (30.2) | 43 |
| Total RD | 25 (59.5) | 17 (40.5) | 42 |
| Complex cataract | 14 (53.8) | 12 (46.2) | 26 |
| Choroidal detachment | 11 (47.8) | 12 (52.2) | 23 |
| Giant break (≥90), | 11 (52.4) | 10 (47.6) | 21 |
| Macular hole | 11 (61.1) | 7 (38.9) | 18 |
| Proliferative diabetic retinopathy | 9 (60.0) | 6 (40.0) | 15 |
| Previous glaucoma surgery | 6 (46.2) | 7 (53.8) | 13 |
| Retinal dialysis | 10 (83.3) | 2 (16.7) | 12 |
| Chronic RD (≥3 months) | 7 (77.8) | 2 (22.2) | 9 |
| Uveitis | 4 (50.0) | 4 (50.0) | 8 |
| Endophtalmitis | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | 3 |
Table 5.
Univariate analysis of the variables used for retinal redetachment analysis. Univariate analysis of qualitative variables that might be associated with retinal redetachment was performed using chi-square tests. The number and percentage of cases of no redetachment and redetachment within each variable are indicated, as are the total numbers for each variable. Chi-square p-values are shown, considering p < 0.05 to be statistically significant.
Table 5.
Univariate analysis of the variables used for retinal redetachment analysis. Univariate analysis of qualitative variables that might be associated with retinal redetachment was performed using chi-square tests. The number and percentage of cases of no redetachment and redetachment within each variable are indicated, as are the total numbers for each variable. Chi-square p-values are shown, considering p < 0.05 to be statistically significant.
| Variable | No Redetachment n(%) | Redetachment n(%) | Total | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female | 163 (78.4) | 45 (21.6) | 208 | 0.04 |
| Male | 242 (66.9) | 120 (33.1) | 362 | ||
| Age (years) | <50 | 71 (68.9) | 32 (31.1) | 103 | 0.170 |
| 50–69 | 227 (74.2) | 79 (25.8) | 306 | ||
| 70–79 | 74 (69.8) | 32 (30.2) | 106 | ||
| ≥80 | 33 (60.0) | 22 (40.0) | 55 | ||
| Laterality | Right | 211 (68.1) | 99 (31.9) | 310 | 0.086 |
| Left | 194 (74.6) | 260 (25.4) | 260 | ||
| Lens status | Phakic | 214 (71.8) | 84 (28.2) | 298 | 0.920 |
| Pseudophakic | 180 (70.3) | 76 (29.7) | 256 | ||
| Aphakic | 5 (62.5) | 3 (37.5) | 8 | ||
| Phakic intraocular lens | 6 (75.0) | 2 (25.0) | 8 | ||
| Pre-operative VA (logMAR) | ≤0.30 | 136 (76.4) | 42 (23.6) | 178 | 0.232 |
| <1.00–>0.30 | 73 (69.5) | 32 (30.5) | 105 | ||
| ≤1.30–≥1.00 | 57 (71.3) | 23 (28.7) | 80 | ||
| CF–NPL | 131 (66.8) | 65 (33.2) | 196 | ||
| Post-operative VA (logMAR) | ≤0.30 | 279 (83.8) | 54 (16.2) | 333 | <0.001 |
| ≤1.00–>0.30 | 79 (68.1) | 37 (31.9) | 116 | ||
| >1.00 | 37 (34.3) | 71 (65.7) | 108 | ||
| Myopia | No | 137 (45.5) | 51 (44.0) | 188 | 0.157 |
| ≤3 Diopters | 57 (71.3) | 23 (28.7) | 80 | ||
| 3–6 Diopters | 41 (83.7) | 8 (16.3) | 49 | ||
| ≥6 Diopters | 66 (66.0) | 34 (34.0) | 100 | ||
| Ocular comorbidity | No | 233 (77.9) | 66 (22.1) | 299 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 170 (63.2) | 99 (36.8) | 269 | ||
| Duration of central vision loss (days) | 0 | 157 (72.7) | 59 (27.3) | 216 | 0.300 |
| 1 | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | 4 | ||
| 2 | 13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 15 | ||
| 3 | 28 (82.4) | 6 (17.6) | 34 | ||
| 4 | 25 (61.0) | 16 (39.0) | 41 | ||
| 5 | 20 (57.1) | 15 (42.9) | 35 | ||
| 6 | 27 (75.0) | 9 (25.0) | 36 | ||
| 7 | 19 (79.2) | 5 (20.8) | 24 | ||
| 8–14 | 41 (69.5) | 18 (30.5) | 59 | ||
| 15–30 | 32 (72.7) | 12 (27.3) | 44 | ||
| 31–90 | 16 (61.5) | 10 (38.5) | 26 | ||
| >90 | 7 (77.8) | 2 (22.2) | 9 | ||
| Macular status | On | 189 (74.4) | 65 (25.6) | 254 | 0.124 |
| Off | 211 (68.5) | 97 (31.5) | 308 | ||
| Number of breaks | 0 | 38 (63.3) | 22 (36.7) | 60 | 0.485 |
| 1 | 211 (73.0) | 78 (27.0) | 289 | ||
| 2 | 87 (72.5) | 33 (27.5) | 120 | ||
| 3 | 33 (68.8) | 15 (31.2) | 48 | ||
| 4 | 16 (69.6) | 7 (30.4) | 23 | ||
| 5 | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | 6 | ||
| 6 | 4 (100) | 0 (0) | 4 | ||
| 7 | 1 (100) | 0 (0) | 1 | ||
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | 0 (0) | 1 (100) | 1 | ||
| Quadrands involved | ST no | 164 (68.6) | 75 (31.4) | 239 | 0.261 |
| ST yes | 240 (72.9) | 89 (27.1) | 329 | ||
| IT no | 210 (75.3) | 69 (24.7) | 279 | 0.032 | |
| IT yes | 194 (67.1) | 95 (32.9) | 289 | ||
| SN no | 235 (71.2) | 95 (28.8) | 330 | 0.958 | |
| SN yes | 169 (71.0) | 69 (29.0) | 238 | ||
| IN no | 261 (75.9) | 83 (24.1) | 344 | 0.002 | |
| IN yes | 143 (63.8) | 81 (36.2) | 224 | ||
| Inferior breaks | No | 263 (72.5) | 100 (27.5) | 363 | 0.499 |
| Yes | 136 (69.7) | 59 (30.3) | 195 | ||
| Proliferative vitreoretinopathy | No | 350 (71.7) | 138 (28.3) | 488 | 0.390 |
| Yes | 55 (67.1) | 27 (32.9) | 82 | ||
| Complex RD | No | 204 (77.9) | 58 (22.1) | 262 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 201 (65.3) | 107 (34.7) | 308 | ||
| Surgical technique | 23G PPV | 91 (71.1) | 37 (28.9) | 128 | 0.825 |
| 25G PPV | 304 (71.0) | 124 (29.0) | 428 | ||
| Classic surgery | 8 (80.0) | 2 (20.0) | 10 | ||
| Laser | No | 99 (73.9) | 35 (26.1) | 134 | 0.401 |
| Yes | 305 (70.1) | 130 (29.9) | 435 | ||
| Cryotherapy | No | 239 (68.5) | 110 (31.5) | 349 | 0.095 |
| Yes | 165 (75.0) | 55 (25.0) | 220 | ||
| Scleral buckle | No | 375 (70.8) | 155 (29.2) | 530 | 0.632 |
| Yes | 29 (74.4) | 10 (25.6) | 39 | ||
| Tamponade method | SF6 | 278 (74.5) | 95 (25.5) | 373 | 0.01 |
| C3F8 | 55 (66.3) | 28 (33.7) | 83 | ||
| Silicone oil | 40 (55.6) | 32 (44.4) | 72 | ||
| Air | 16 (72.7) | 6 (27.3) | 22 | ||
| Sub-retinal fluid drainage | Break | 370 (71.7) | 146 (28.3) | 516 | 0.248 |
| Retinotomy | 34 (64.2) | 19 (35.8) | 53 | ||
| Surgeon | 1 | 20 (80) | 5 (20) | 25 | 0.035 |
| 2 | 51 (63) | 30 (37) | 81 | ||
| 3 | 68 (84) | 13 (16) | 81 | ||
| 4 | 55 (66.3) | 28 (33.7) | 83 | ||
| 5 | 81 (75.7) | 26 (24.3) | 107 | ||
| 6 | 90 (70.9) | 37 (29.1) | 127 | ||
| 7 | 38 (60.3) | 25 (39.7) | 63 | ||
Table 6.
Logistic regression. After multivariate analysis of the variables that might be associated with primary RD redetachment, results are shown for variables found to be significant. Results are represented as odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p values.
Table 6.
Logistic regression. After multivariate analysis of the variables that might be associated with primary RD redetachment, results are shown for variables found to be significant. Results are represented as odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p values.
| Variable | Odds Ratio | p Value | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female | Reference | - | - |
| Male | 2 | 0.002 | 1.4–5.7 | |
| Ocular comorbidity | No | Reference | - | - |
| Yes | 1.9 | 0.015 | 1.2–2.9 | |
Table 7.
Univariate analysis of the variables used for final post-operative VA analysis. Univariate analysis of qualitative variables that might be associated with final post-operative VA in patients not suffering redetachment was performed using chi-square tests. The number and percentage of cases of VA > 0.3 logMAR and VA ≤ 0.30 logMAR within each variable, as well as the total number for each variable, were indicated. Chi-square p values are shown, considering p < 0.05 to be statistically significant.
Table 7.
Univariate analysis of the variables used for final post-operative VA analysis. Univariate analysis of qualitative variables that might be associated with final post-operative VA in patients not suffering redetachment was performed using chi-square tests. The number and percentage of cases of VA > 0.3 logMAR and VA ≤ 0.30 logMAR within each variable, as well as the total number for each variable, were indicated. Chi-square p values are shown, considering p < 0.05 to be statistically significant.
| Variable | VA > 1.0 logMAR n(%) | VA 1.0–0.3 logMAR n(%) | VA ≤ 0.30 logMAR n(%) | Total | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | <50 | 5 (7.7) | 18 (26.5) | 45 (66.2) | 68 | <0.001 |
| 50–69 | 13 (5.8) | 32 (14.3) | 178 (79.8) | 223 | ||
| 70–79 | 9 (12.5) | 17 (23.6) | 46 (63.9) | 72 | ||
| ≥80 | 10 (31.3) | 12 (37.5) | 10 (31.3) | 32 | ||
| Laterality | Right | 18 (8.6) | 42 (20.1) | 149 (71.3) | 209 | 0.861 |
| Left | 19 (10.2) | 37 (19.9) | 130 (69.9) | 186 | ||
| Lens | Phakic | 16 (7.6) | 37 (17.6) | 157 (74.8) | 210 | 0.351 |
| Pseudophakic | 20 | 38 | 116 | 174 | ||
| Aphakic | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 2 (40.0) | 5 | ||
| IOL phakic | 0 (0.0) | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | 6 | ||
| Myopia | No | 7 (5.3) | 24 (18.0) | 102 (76.7) | 133 | <0.001 |
| ≤3 Diopters | 3 (5.4) | 11 (19.6) | 42 (75.0) | 56 | ||
| 3–6 Diopters | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) | 40 (97.6) | 41 | ||
| ≥6 Diopters | 13 (20.0) | 15 (23.1) | 37 (56.9) | 65 | ||
| Ocular comorbidities | No | 7 (3.0) | 39 (17.0) | 184 (80.0) | 230 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 30 (18.4) | 40 (24.5) | 93 (57.1) | 163 | ||
| Days of central vision loss | 0 | 14 (9.1) | 17 (11) | 123 (79.9) | 154 | 0.004 |
| 1 | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (50.0) | 2 | ||
| 2 | 0 (0.0) | 4 (30.8) | 9 (69.2) | 13 | ||
| 3 | 2 (7.41) | 5 (18.5) | 20 (74.1) | 27 | ||
| 4 | 0 (0.0) | 6 (25.0) | 18 (75.0) | 24 | ||
| 5 | 2 (10.0) | 5 (25.0) | 13 (65.0) | 20 | ||
| 6 | 4 (14.8) | 5 (18.5) | 18 (66.7) | 27 | ||
| 7 | 1 (5.3) | 6 (31.6) | 12 (63.1) | 19 | ||
| 8–14 | 2 (4.9) | 12 (29.3) | 27 (65.8) | 41 | ||
| 15–30 | 3 (9.7) | 10 (32.3) | 18 (58.0) | 31 | ||
| 31–90 | 2 (12.5) | 6 (37.5) | 8 (50.0) | 16 | ||
| >90 | 3 (50.0) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (16.7) | 6 | ||
| Macular status | On | 13 (7.0) | 20 (10.7) | 153 (82.3) | 186 | <0.001 |
| Off | 24 (11.7) | 56 (27.3) | 125 (61.0) | 205 | ||
| Number of breaks | 0 | 16 (44.4) | 5 (13.9) | 15 (41.7) | 36 | <0.001 |
| 1–4 | 18 (5.3) | 68 (19.9) | 255 (74.8) | 341 | ||
| 5–9 | 0 (0.0) | 3 (30.0) | 7 (70.0) | 10 | ||
| Involvement | ST no | 18 (11.3) | 28 (17.6) | 113 (71.1) | 159 | 0.427 |
| ST yes | 19 (8.1) | 50 (21.3) | 116 (70.6) | 235 | ||
| IT no | 10 (4.8) | 43 (20.6) | 156 (75.6) | 209 | 0.004 | |
| IT yes | 27 (14.6) | 35 (18.9) | 123 (66.5) | 185 | ||
| SN no | 19 (8.3) | 42 (18.3) | 169 (73.5) | 230 | 0.374 | |
| SN yes | 18 (11.0) | 36 (21.9) | 110 (67.1) | 164 | ||
| IN no | 11 (4.3) | 52 (20.2) | 195 (75.6) | 258 | <0.001 | |
| IN yes | 26 (19.1) | 26 (19.1) | 84 (61.8) | 136 | ||
| Inferior breaks | No | 32 (12.4) | 53 (20.5) | 173 (67.1) | 258 | 0.003 |
| Yes | 3 (2.3) | 25 (18.9) | 104 (78.8) | 132 | ||
| PVR | No | 24 (7.0) | 59 (17.2) | 260 (75.8) | 343 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 13 (25.0) | 20 (38.5) | 19 (36.5) | 52 | ||
| Complex RD | No | 10 (5.0) | 34 (16.8) | 158 (78.2) | 202 | 0.001 |
| Yes | 27 (14.0) | 45 (23.3) | 121 (62.7) | 193 | ||
| Surgical technique | 23G PPV | 11 (12.4) | 19 (21.3) | 59 (66.3) | 89 | 0.543 |
| 25G PPV | 26 (8.8) | 57 (19.2) | 213 (72.0) | 296 | ||
| Classic surgery | 0 (0.0) | 3 (33.3) | 6 (66.7) | 9 | ||
| Laser | No | 4 (4.2) | 20 (20.8) | 72 (75.0) | 96 | 0.130 |
| Yes | 33 (11.1) | 59 (19.8) | 206 (69.1) | 298 | ||
| Cryotherapy | No | 30 (12.9) | 41 (17.7) | 161 (69.4) | 232 | 0.01 |
| Yes | 7 (4.3) | 38 (23.5) | 117 (72.2) | 162 | ||
| Scleral buckle | No | 33 (8.9) | 73 (19.7) | 265 (71.4) | 371 | 0.248 |
| Yes | 4 (17.4) | 6 (26.1) | 13 (56.5) | 23 | ||
| Tamponade method | SF6 | 12 (4.4) | 53 (19.4) | 208 (76.2) | 273 | <0.001 |
| C3F8 | 1 (1.8) | 12 (22.2) | 41 (76) | 54 | ||
| Silicone oil | 24 (64.9) | 9 (24.3) | 4 (10.8) | 37 | ||
| Air | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.2) | 15 (93.8) | 16 | ||
| Sub-retinal fluid drainage | Break | 28 (7.8) | 70 (19.4) | 262 (72.8) | 360 | <0.001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Irigoyen, C.; Goikoetxea-Zubeldia, A.; Sanchez-Molina, J.; Amenabar Alonso, A.; Ruiz-Miguel, M.; Iglesias-Gaspar, M.T. Incidence and Risk Factors Affecting the Recurrence of Primary Retinal Detachment in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4551. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154551
AMA Style
Irigoyen C, Goikoetxea-Zubeldia A, Sanchez-Molina J, Amenabar Alonso A, Ruiz-Miguel M, Iglesias-Gaspar MT. Incidence and Risk Factors Affecting the Recurrence of Primary Retinal Detachment in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(15):4551. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154551
Chicago/Turabian StyleIrigoyen, Cristina, Ainhoa Goikoetxea-Zubeldia, Jorge Sanchez-Molina, Asier Amenabar Alonso, Miguel Ruiz-Miguel, and Maria Teresa Iglesias-Gaspar. 2022. "Incidence and Risk Factors Affecting the Recurrence of Primary Retinal Detachment in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 15: 4551. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154551
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
