Next Article in Journal
The Value of Fetal Head Station as a Delivery Mode Predictor in Primiparous Women at Term before the Onset of Labor
Previous Article in Journal
The Assessment of Myocardial Longitudinal Strain in a Paediatric Spanish Population Using a New Software Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Viewpoint

Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients on Dupilumab

1
Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA
2
John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
3
Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT 84107, USA
4
Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3273; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123273
Submission received: 2 May 2022 / Revised: 26 May 2022 / Accepted: 3 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)

Abstract

:
Dupilumab is a biologic approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. While it is an effective medication for eczema, ocular side effects are common in patients receiving dupilumab therapy. Greater consideration is needed when evaluating these individuals for corneal refractive surgery. Dupilumab patients may suffer from atopy, a condition that also merits consideration in those desiring refractive surgery. Additional testing and careful consideration are needed, as these patients have an increased risk of dry eye syndrome, keratoconus, cataracts, diffuse lamellar keratitis, viral keratitis, and perioperative infection. This commentary discusses the current understanding of dupilumab ocular side effects and investigates factors to consider when evaluating these patients for corneal refractive surgery.

Dupilumab (Dupixent) is a monoclonal antibody that was approved in 2017 by the US FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and asthma maintenance therapy. Dupilumab blocks interleukins 4 and 13, preventing the differentiation of undifferentiated T-cells into allergy-regulating type 2 helper T-cells [1,2]. Notable improvement in atopic dermatitis symptom severity has been documented since dupilumab entered the market.
US FDA reports of 529 patients show that ocular side effects at 16 weeks of dupilumab treatment include conjunctivitis (10%), blepharitis (<1%), dry eye (<1%), eye pruritis (1%), and keratitis (<1%), with an average time of symptom onset being 6 ± 5.5 weeks [3,4,5]. Due to these side effects, the dupilumab insert suggests discussing all medical conditions, including eye problems, with a healthcare provider.
Interleukins 4 and 13 have been implicated in dry eye symptoms in dupilumab patients. Interleukin-4 is integral to the production of meibum, and blocking its function causes meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Upwards of 25% of patients receiving dupilumab suffer from this condition, and symptoms appear after six months of dupilumab use [6,7]. IL-13 has been shown to stimulate goblet cells, and inhibiting its function can lead to hypoplasia or complete absence of these cells in dupilumab patients [8,9,10]. Goblet cell dysfunction causes decreased mucin on the ocular surface. Mucin maintains the wettability of the ocular surface and contributes to tear film stability [11]. Patients on dupilumab may experience dry eye symptoms due to mucin deficiency, disrupting the tear film layer.
Patients on dupilumab desiring corneal refractive surgery (CRS) undergo a litany of tests, in addition to a complete history, comprehensive eye examination, and screening for glaucoma, corneal diseases, and other pre-existing eye or systemic diseases. These tests include corneal staining, which may reveal the characteristic MGD pattern of punctate epitheliopathy and erosion. Eye care providers should be increasingly vigilant to the information disclosed by meibography, corneal staining, tear break-up test, conjunctival impression cytology, and dry eye questionnaires because of increased susceptibility in dupilumab patients to tear problems, MGD, and conjunctivitis (Table 1).
In addition, it is essential to be cognizant of the underlying medical issue in patients on dupilumab. They may suffer from atopy, a genetic tendency to develop diseases such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis. Thorough screening for keratoconus, ectasia, and subtle posterior subcapsular cataract is necessary as atopic patients have a higher predisposition for these conditions. Eye care professionals need to perform a thorough slit lamp examination in conjunction with detailed tomography and topography screenings during CRS evaluation of this patient population. Assessment of eye rubbing habits should also be included in the evaluation, as the risk of keratoconus is increased with chronic eye rubbing [12] (Table 1).
Dupilumab patients also have higher staphylococcal bacterial counts on the skin, lid margin colonization, and increased risk of viral keratitis and diffuse lamellar keratitis if undergoing LASIK surgery [13]. Bacterial colonization of the eyelid margin increases the risk of perioperative corneal infection without proper sanitation practices [14]. The patient’s informed consent should include the additional risks and post-operative complications after CRS such as worsening dry eye.
It is important for eye care physicians and referring providers to consult with the managing dermatologist or allergist concerning the stability of the disease prior to elective procedures such as corneal refractive surgery. A plan regarding the maintenance of dupilumab and continuity of care should be in place, including artificial tears, punctal plugs, and topical administration of cyclosporine and lifitegrast as needed [15]. Most patients do not need to discontinue dupilumab while adverse effects are managed. Only severe cases or cases refractive to post-refractive surgery treatment may require discontinuation of dupilumab [16].

Conclusions

Dupilumab was approved by the US FDA for the treatment of atopic dermatitis and has been effective in disease management. It is not uncommon for these patients to suffer from other atopic diseases. Atopy and dupilumab place patients at increased risk for cataracts, keratoconus, dry eye, viral conjunctivitis, and postoperative complications. These patients may seek corneal refractive surgery, presenting complex cases for eye care professionals. While the evidence is limited, there is no absolute contraindication to CRS, even if a patient is on dupilumab treatment. However, these cases require an in-depth evaluation, including greater attention to meibography, topography, corneal staining, goblet cell function, and awareness of increased perioperative infection.

Author Contributions

M.M. contributed to the perspective conception. T.S. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to revisions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Courtney Webster for assistance in editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Harb, H.; Chatila, T.A. Mechanisms of Dupilumab. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2020, 50, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. D’Ippolito, D.; Pisano, M. Dupilumab (Dupixent): An Interleukin-4 Receptor Antagonist for Atopic Dermatitis. Pharm. Ther. 2018, 43, 532–535. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, Y.; Jorizzo, J.L. Retrospective analysis of adverse events with dupilumab reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2021, 84, 1010–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. FDA. Dupixent Prescribing Information. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/761055lbl.pdf (accessed on 7 April 2022).
  5. Popiela, M.Z.; Barbara, R.; Turnbull, A.M.J.; Corden, E.; Martinez-Falero, B.S.; O’Driscoll, D.; Ardern-Jones, M.R.; Hossain, P.N. Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease: Presentation, management and long-term sequelae. Eye 2021, 35, 3277–3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tauqeer, Z.; Jinno, S.E.; Chung, C.W.; Massaro-Giordano, M.; Bunya, V.Y. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment for Dupilumab-Related Ocular Complications in Atopic Dermatitis Patients. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2022, 16, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Paulose, S.A.; Sherman, S.W.; Glass, L.R.D.; Suh, L.H. Dupilumab-associated blepharoconjunctivitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2019, 16, 100550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mehta, U.V.; Farid, M. Dupilumab Induced Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency. Int. Med. Case Rep. J. 2021, 14, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Henriksson, J.T.; Coursey, T.G.; Corry, D.B.; de Paiva, C.S.; Pflugfelder, S.C. IL-13 Stimulates Proliferation and Expression of Mucin and Immunomodulatory Genes in Cultured Conjunctival Goblet Cells. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 4186–4197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Bakker, D.; Ariens, L.F.M.; van Luijk, C.; van Der Schaft, J.; Thijs, J.; Schuttelaar, M.; van Wijk, F.; Knol, E.; Balak, D.; van Dijk, M.; et al. Goblet cell scarcity and conjunctival inflammation during treatment with dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2019, 180, 1248–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Baudouin, C.; Rolando, M.; Del Castillo, J.M.B.; Messmer, E.M.; Figueiredo, F.C.; Irkec, M.; van Setten, G.; Labetoulle, M. Reconsidering the central role of mucins in dry eye and ocular surface diseases. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2019, 71, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Najmi, H.; Mobarki, Y.; Mania, K.; AlTowairqi, B.; Basehi, M.; Mahfouz, M.S.; Elmahdy, M. The correlation between keratoconus and eye rubbing: A review. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 12, 1775–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boorstein, S.M.; Henk, H.J.; Elner, V.M. Atopy: A patient-specific risk factor for diffuse lamellar keratitis. Ophthalmology 2003, 110, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fleming, P.; Drucker, A.M. Risk of infection in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2018, 78, 62–69.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alkharashi, M.; Bower, K.S.; Daoud, Y.J.; Stark, W.J. Refractive surgery in systemic and autoimmune disease. Middle East Afr. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 21, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Narla, S.; Silverberg, J.I.; Simpson, E.L. Management of inadequate response and adverse effects to dupilumab in atopic dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2022, 86, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Clinical Findings, Eye Examinations and Tests for Evaluation of Atopic Patients on Dupilumab Considering Corneal Refractive Surgery.
Table 1. Clinical Findings, Eye Examinations and Tests for Evaluation of Atopic Patients on Dupilumab Considering Corneal Refractive Surgery.
Clinical FindingExaminations and Tests
ConjunctivitisDupilumab-associated conjunctivitis necessitates special conjunctival staining and careful examination of bulbar and palpebral conjunctival surfaces
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD)Meibography, tear film break-up time, Schirmer test
Goblet Cell DysfunctionConjunctival Impression Cytology
Viral keratitisSlit lamp examination, corneal staining
Atopic patients are at higher risk of developing viral infections such as herpetic keratitis when on dupilumab
Staph marginal keratitisSlit lamp examination, Gram stain, culture, and sensitivity
More predisposed to blepharitis, can develop marginal keratitis during the perioperative stage of CRS with a high risk of corneal infection
CataractSlit lamp examination, specifically for posterior subcapsular cataract in atopic patients
KeratoconusCorneal tomography and topography atopic patients are more predisposed to corneal ectasia
Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis (DLK)Slit lamp examination
Atopic patients have a greater predisposition to DLK after LASIK surgery
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moshirfar, M.; Seitz, T.; Ply, B.; Ronquillo, Y.C.; Hoopes, P.C. Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients on Dupilumab. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123273

AMA Style

Moshirfar M, Seitz T, Ply B, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC. Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients on Dupilumab. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(12):3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshirfar, Majid, Tanner Seitz, Brianna Ply, Yasmyne C. Ronquillo, and Phillip C. Hoopes. 2022. "Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients on Dupilumab" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 12: 3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123273

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop