Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of Prehospital Death in Trauma Victims
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Missing Data on Disabilities in Patients Treated with High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Recurrence of Hepatic Encephalopathy after TIPS: Effective Prophylaxis with Combination of Lactulose and Rifaximin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Finite Mixture Models Based on Pain Intensity, Functional Disability and Psychological Distress Composite Assessment Allow Identification of Two Distinct Classes of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome after Surgery Patients Related to Their Quality of Life
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Machine Learning Algorithms Provide Greater Prediction of Response to SCS Than Lead Screening Trial: A Predictive AI-Based Multicenter Study

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(20), 4764; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204764
by Amine Ounajim 1,2,*, Maxime Billot 1, Lisa Goudman 3,4, Pierre-Yves Louis 5,6, Yousri Slaoui 2, Manuel Roulaud 1, Bénédicte Bouche 1, Philippe Page 7, Bertille Lorgeoux 1, Sandrine Baron 1, Nihel Adjali 1, Kevin Nivole 1, Nicolas Naiditch 1,8, Chantal Wood 1, Raphaël Rigoard 9, Romain David 1,10, Maarten Moens 3,4 and Philippe Rigoard 1,7,11
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(20), 4764; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204764
Submission received: 31 August 2021 / Revised: 8 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 18 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Neuromodulation for Pain Management)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I think this is a fascinating study, but I have a few questions.
Are the doctors and facilities seeing these patients the same? I would think that the compatibility between patient and doctor would be a significant factor in the treatment.

Were there any cases that deviated significantly from the predictive settings by the AI? I hope such patients do not exist, but I would like to know the elements of the patients whose results were off.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors

The title of this study seems to be consistent with the Journal of Clinical Medicine. I think this paper will be better if some minor and major points are corrected.

Minor points

The 'n' for the number of people or something should be in italics.

Except for %, all symbols, whether numbers or words, must be spaced by a space.

 

Major points

The reason for the continued appearance of FBSS may be the effect of surgical treatment, but it will also include various demographic characteristics of the patient and problems with postoperative management. Therefore, it is thought that this manuscript will be clearer if the demographic characteristics of the patients before or after surgery and, moreover, what kind of rehabilitation they received or what kind of management they received are included.

Sincerely,

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop