Next Article in Journal
Hyperprolactinemia in Adults with Prader-Willi Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Cataract Surgery by Intraoperative Surface Irrigation with 0.25% Povidone–Iodine
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Comparative Impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors on Advanced Esophageal or Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(16), 3612; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163612
by SuA Oh 1, Eunyoung Kim 1,* and Heeyoung Lee 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(16), 3612; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163612
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Revised: 12 August 2021 / Accepted: 13 August 2021 / Published: 16 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This meta-analysis by Oh and colleagues aims at evaluating the effectiveness of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 inhibitors in gastroesophageal cancer.

There are few major comments.

  • This review focuses on gastroesophageal cancer, however it is not clear the  exact tumor site object of this work (gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer? only gastroesophageal junction cancer? also esophageal - even squamous - cancer?). Theoretically, different tumors (such as esophageal and gastric cancer) might not be together considered. This aspect should be better clarified and justified.
  • It is not mentioned the setting where the immune checkpoint inhibitors are used (line of treatment). I hypothesize that different studies were together considered given the relative limited number of studies. However, it must be discussed.
  • Figures 2 and 3: the legends and the figures can not be easily interpreted.
  • A comparison between anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 can not be statistically performed in this way.
  • The control group of different studies may vary. Discuss this aspect.
  • The authors considered OS and PFS of various studies, considering them as major outcomes. However, they did not represent primary endpoints of the singles studies and this could represent a bias.

Author Response

We uploaded a file for responses to the reviewer's comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

the manuscript is well written though there is missing data and i would like that the authors will add the data from keynote 570 chekmate 577 and chekmate 649 for the complete this meta analysis this studies are the pivotal studies that need to be included in this kind of manuscript

Author Response

We uploaded a file of responses to the reviewer's comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I appreciated to review a revised version of the the manuscript titled "Comparative impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors on advanced gastric esophageal cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis" submitted by SuA Oh and colleagues for consideration in JCM.

I would like to thank the authors for taking the time to thoroughly respond to my comments and carefully address them in the revised version of the manuscript. I also would like to congratulate them for this major revision of their work. Overall, the major limitations that I had highlighted are now acknowledged and addressed. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

i thank the authors for adding the data that was missing to analysis and to references list

i would change the title of the manuscript  and omit he world meta analysis systematic review is the appropriate

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop