Next Article in Journal
Benefits of Steroid Therapy in COVID-19 Patients with Different PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at Admission
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Early Pancreatic Graft Loss on Outcome after Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation (SPKT)—A Landmark Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
State-of-the-Art Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 15
10.3390/jcm10153235
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dynamic Left Intraventricular Obstruction Phenotype in Takotsubo Syndrome

by
Davide Di Vece
1,
Angelo Silverio
2,
Michele Bellino
2,
Gennaro Galasso
2,
Carmine Vecchione
2,3,
Giovanni La Canna
4 and
Rodolfo Citro
2,5,*,†
1
University Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
2
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Salerno, 84131 Salerno, Italy
3
Vascular Pathophysiology Unit, IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense, 18, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
4
IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Applied Diagnostic Echocardiography Unit, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
5
Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, University Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona”, 84131 Salerno, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: FESC, Heart Department, University Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona”, Largo Città d’Ippocrate, 84131 Salerno, Italy.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(15), 3235; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153235
Submission received: 22 June 2021 / Revised: 20 July 2021 / Accepted: 21 July 2021 / Published: 22 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Phenotypes and Phenocopies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is characterized by acute, generally transient left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Although TTS has been long regarded as a benign condition, recent evidence showed that rate of acute complications and in-hospital mortality is comparable to that of patients with acute coronary syndrome. In particular, the prevalence of cardiogenic shock ranges between 6% and 20%. In this setting, detection of mechanisms leading to cardiogenic shock can be challenging. Besides a severely impaired systolic function, onset of LV outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) together with mitral regurgitation related to systolic anterior motion of mitral valve leaflets can lead to hemodynamic instability. Early identification of LVOTO with echocardiography is crucial and has important implications on selection of the appropriate therapy. Application of short-acting b1-selective betablockers and prudent administration of fluids might help to resolve LVOTO. Conversely, inotrope agents may increase basal hypercontractility and worsen the intraventricular pressure gradient. To date, outcomes and management of patients with TTS complicated by LVOTO as yet has not been comprehensively investigated.

1. Takotsubo Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), also known as stress cardiomyopathy or “broken-heart syndrome”, is an emerging condition first described in Japanese women during the early 1990s. It is characterized by acute and usually transient left ventricular (LV) dysfunction [1,2]. Several triggering factors may lead to the onset of TTS. These include negative or positive emotional stressors and physical stressors due to severe medical conditions, such as end-stage chronic obstructive lung disease, intracranial hemorrhages, or post-surgical status.
The clinical presentation of TTS resembles that of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Chest pain, dyspnea, or syncope are common symptoms at onset [3]. Several electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities are detected in most TTS patients [2,4,5]. A slight increase in cardiomyocyte injury biomarkers is frequently observed in TTS. Typically, the rise of serum troponin is disproportionately low compared with the wide extent of regional wall motion abnormalities [2].
In most cases, patients with TTS present normal coronary arteries. However, a co-existing coronary artery disease is observed in about 15% of cases in the absence of a culprit lesion [6]. While transthoracic echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality in patients with suspected TTS, coronary angiography including left ventriculography is currently considered essential to rule out ACS [7]. Due to the possibility of performing tissue characterization, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) plays a central role in the assessment of patients with suspected TTS. In this sense, myocardial edema, which can be detected by T2 weighted black blood imaging, may be considered as a hallmark of TTS. The detection of myocardial edema rather than fibrosis or necrosis (with late gadolinium enhancement) is helpful to rule out different diagnoses, such as myocardial infarction or myocarditis [8,9].
The main feature of TTS is the presence of transient myocardial wall motion abnormalities normally extending beyond the territory supplied by a single epicardial coronary artery [5,10]. The most common TTS morphological variant is defined as “apical ballooning” and is characterized by diffuse a- or hypokinesia of apical and midventricular myocardial segments (circumferential pattern) with basal hyperkinesia (Figure 1). Anatomical variants include “midventricular ballooning” as well as rarer forms, such as inverted or “basal” ballooning and the “focal” type [2,11]. Furthermore, right ventricular involvement (biventricular ballooning) has been reported in about 15% of TTS patients [12].
The prevalence of TTS is estimated in approximately 2%–3% of patients admitted with suspected ACS [13,14]. Individuals affected are mainly women in postmenopausal period. However, about 10% of patients are male; furthermore, a few cases affecting children have also been reported [15,16].
The pathophysiological mechanism of TTS is not yet clearly elucidated. A sympathetic overdrive seems to play a central role in TTS onset. This most likely reflects cardiac response to serum catecholamine spillover, and is precipitated in around two-thirds of cases instigated by an emotional or physical stressful trigger event [2,17]. The myocardial stunning observed in TTS has been attributed to possible coronary microcirculation dysfunction and/or the direct negative inotropic effect of catecholamine on cardiomyocytes, rather than an ischemic mechanism [18,19]. Hence, TTS was recently reclassified as “acute myocardial injury” of non-ischemic nature and excluded from the class of disorders known as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) [20].
Due to the reversibility of myocardial wall motion abnormalities, TTS has been long regarded as a benign condition. However, recent studies show that a considerable number of patients experience severe complications, and the rate of in-hospital mortality is comparable to that of patients with ACS (1%–4.5%) [2]. The driving cause of adverse events is the acute impairment of LV function, leading to acute heart failure in 12%–45%, and to cardiogenic shock in 6%–20% of cases [21,22]. Furthermore, hemodynamic deterioration can be precipitated by LV outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), which can be associated with systolic anterior motion (SAM) of mitral valve leaflets and moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation [23]. While complications are mainly related to acute heart failure, a significant number of patients experience adverse events due to electrical instability. T-wave inversion with significant QT-interval prolongation are typical electrocardiographic findings in the subacute phase of TTS. Ventricular arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes and ventricular fibrillation, severely complicate the in-hospital course of 2%–10% of patients [24,25]. An association between TTS and cardiac arrest has been reported in about 5% of cases [26]. Detection of intraventricular thrombi and/or cardioembolic complications has been reported in about 3% of TTS patients [27]. Further rare but life-threatening complications include ventricular septal defect and LV free wall rupture (<1%) [28,29].

2. Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Takotsubo Syndrome

2.1. Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: Definition and Clinical Features

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is a dynamic phenomenon defined by an intraventricular peak gradient ≥25 mmHg detected by Doppler echocardiography, and is considered hemodynamically significant in the presence of gradients ≥50 mmHg (Figure 2) [30].
The presence of LVOTO is one of the typical features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Predisposing factors in this setting are asymmetrical septal hypertrophy, anterior papillary muscle displacement and elongated mitral valve leaflets [31]. Patients with LVOTO may experience symptoms such as angina, dyspnea, exertional fatigue, and syncope. Generally, LVOTO is a dynamic phenomenon and varies according to loading conditions. Reduction of preload and afterload, Valsalva maneuver, drug administration, or meals can unmask or worsen intraventricular obstruction in patients without a significant resting intraventricular gradient [32,33]. Detection of LVOTO at rest or through provocation maneuvers has important implications for risk stratification and decision making regarding medical therapy. Lifestyle measures such as avoiding dehydration and excessive alcohol intake should be advised to patients with LVOTO. Regarding medical therapy, betablockers are considered as first-line drugs in symptomatic patients. In case of contraindications to betablockers, verapamil is recommended as second-line option for symptom relief [30].
The prevalence of different causes of LVOTO has not yet been fully investigated. In a case series of 73 patients with an intraventricular pressure gradient ≥50 mmHg, besides hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (74%), other conditions such as hypertensive hypertrophy (9%), post-cardiac surgery (7%), sigmoid septum (4%), hyperkinetic LV (3%), subaortic stenosis (1.5%), and TTS (1.5%) were detected in association with LVOTO [34].

2.2. Pathophysiology and Prevalence of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Takotsubo Syndrome

The onset of LVOTO during the acute phase of TTS is a challenging complication, and its severity varies depending on hemodynamic status. Owing to increased intraventricular afterload and systolic wall stress, leading in turn to subendocardial ischemia, LVOTO was previously considered to be the unique pathogenetic mechanism of apical TTS. However, this hypothesis lost consistency as the prevalence of LVOTO in a large series of TTS patients was reported to range between 7% and 25% [23,35,36,37]. The state of plasmatic catecholamine surge creates a paradoxical situation of mid-apical myocardial stunning and compensatory hypercontractility of the basal segments. Together with myocardial structural changes, this may create the rheological conditions for the development of dynamic obstruction. Furthermore, predisposing factors for the development of LVOTO are a small ventricular cavity and asymmetric hypertrophy of the interventricular septum (septal bulge). The onset of apical morphological variant of TTS can result in re-orientation of intraventricular drag forces, generating a “pushing” effect with SAM of mitral leaflets towards the septum. Subsequently, hypercontractility of the basal segments together with increment of septal thickness due to myocardial edema may lead to high-flow velocity in a narrowed LVOT, producing a suction effect (Venturi effect) on valve apparatus with further SAM of the anterior mitral leaflet. In addition to dynamic intraventricular obstruction, SAM may induce secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) due to leaflet malcoaptation. Furthermore, the increased afterload related to LVOTO leads in a vicious circle to a worsening of apical myocardial dysfunction owing to increased shear stress and imbalance in the oxygen supply/demand ratio. All these changes have a negative impact on cardiac output and could synergically lead to cardiogenic shock and pulmonary artery hypertension, depending on MR degree and left atrial compliance [9,38,39]. Beyond SAM, secondary MR in TTS may be due to mitral leaflet tethering as a consequence of papillary muscle displacement in patients with extended myocardial dysfunction and altered geometry of the LV. Overall, significant MR has been reported in around 20% of TTS patients and is associated with a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events. These forms of secondary MR generally resolve in the recovery of LV myocardial function and SAM-related interventricular pressure gradient resolution, respectively [23].
In a small cohort of 32 TTS patients, LVOTO was detected with echocardiography in 8 patients (25%). All patients with LVOTO showed septal bulge and SAM. Moreover, moderate-to-severe MR occurred more often in patients with TTS and LVOTO as compared to patients without LVOTO [35]. In line with these findings, De Backer et al. identified LVOTO in 6 out of 32 TTS patients (19%). In this clinical series, patients with LVOTO were older and showed septal bulge more frequently than patients without LVOTO. Furthermore, LVOTO was more often associated with SAM, significant MR, and cardiogenic shock [36]. Large national registries such as the Takotsubo Italian Network (TIN) and the Spanish Registry on Takotsubo Syndrome (RETAKO) reported a prevalence of LVOTO in TTS of 13% and 7%, respectively. In the TIN, LVOTO was associated with a composite of adverse events including acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock and in-hospital death. In the RETAKO, LVOTO was observed to be independently associated with cardiogenic shock [23,37].
In a study cohort of 44 TTS patients with LVOTO, morphological features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy such as high interventricular septal thickness, elongated anterior mitral leaflet, and increased mitral coaptation to posterior wall distance, were detected before TTS onset. Based on these findings it has been suggested that TTS with LVOTO may represent the clinical phenotype of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with dynamic LV obstruction triggered by a stressor [40]. However, considering that the pathophysiological mechanism of LVOTO in TTS has been previously described, this hypothesis remains solely speculative.

2.3. Acute Management of Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome Complicated by Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction

Different mechanisms can lead to hemodynamic deterioration in patients with TTS. Prompt implementation of echocardiography is fundamental to rule out LVOTO in patients with arterial hypotension and/or hemodynamic deterioration. Early detection or rule out of LVOTO is crucial to guide patient management and avoid inappropriate therapies which could further worsen hemodynamic status (Figure 3). In patients with TTS complicated by LVOTO and cardiogenic shock, positive inotropic agents may enhance basal hypercontractility, while diuretics result in a decrease of preload with a further worsening of intraventricular pressure gradient and related MR. Therefore, positive inotropes should be discontinued, and rather than volume depletion careful fluid administration under hemodynamic monitoring should be considered [7,41].
While prognostic value of betablockers in TTS is controversial in the long term, the use of these drugs might be beneficial for management of acute heart failure until recovery of LV systolic function [2,42]. However, the safety of betablockers in the setting of hypotension and cardiogenic shock is debatable. In TTS patients with cardiogenic shock due to primary pump failure, non-adrenergic inotropic drugs such as levosimendan rather than betablockers should be considered. Conversely, beta1-selective betablockers may help decrease the intraventricular pressure gradient by reducing basal hypercontractility and improving LV filling in patients with hemodynamic deterioration due to LVOTO. Therefore, low doses of short half-life molecules such as esmolol, or alternatively an ultrashort-acting highly cardioselective β1-blocker such as landiolol, may be useful in this challenging scenario [43,44].
In critical cases with cardiogenic shock and LVOTO, mechanical circulatory support might be a valuable resource as a bridge to recovery. The Impella® assist device could maintain systemic blood pressure by propelling blood from the LV into the ascending aorta, skipping the LVOTO. In addition, the position of the device in the LV outflow tract could mechanically interfere with SAM, favoring the resolution of the intraventricular gradient and related MR [45]. In selected cases with abrupt hemodynamic worsening and multiple-organ failure, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be a rescue option. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation should be avoided in patients with manifest intraventricular pressure gradient, since afterload reduction could precipitate or worsen LVOTO. In the acute phase of TTS, percutaneous mitral clip implantation could represent a rescue therapy to resolve SAM-related LVOTO and MR when unresponsive to medical therapy, especially in patients with an elongated left anterior mitral leaflet.
Due to the lack of randomized clinical trials, to date no established guidelines are available to support specific treatment options in TTS. Therefore, current recommendations solely rely on small case series and on expert opinion.

2.4. Late-Onset Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Takotsubo Syndrome: A Different Clinical Entity?

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction has been generally described as a complication of acute phase TTS. Nevertheless, few case reports describe late-onset LVOTO occurring during or after the recovery phase. The pathogenesis of late-onset LVOTO is poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that TTS could induce permanent changes in LV geometry, affecting intraventricular septal thickness and chamber volumes. These abnormalities could remain asymptomatic in most patients, whereas they could have clinical implications, including LVOTO onset, in the presence of pre-existing subclinical myocardial disease (i.e., hypertensive cardiomyopathy) [46,47,48]. In conclusion, LVOTO can affect the clinical course of TTS not only during the acute phase, but also after the resolution of regional wall motion abnormalities. It is conceivable that late-onset LVOTO may persist over the long term and, furthermore, have prognostic implications. However, these aspects will need to be addressed in future studies.

2.5. Follow-Up and Long-Term Management

Long-term outcomes and management of patients with TTS and LVOTO has not yet been comprehensively investigated. Although the use of ACE inhibitors has been reported in association with better long-term outcomes in overall TTS patients, it is not known whether this beneficial effect also subsists in those with LVOTO, or whether this sub-cohort requires specific treatment [2]. Besides detecting myocardial edema in the acute or post-acute setting, CMR can reveal persistent subclinical changes, such as global microscopic fibrosis, even at long-term follow-up [49]. Therefore, this technique might be a useful tool to identify long-standing structural damages which might be associated with late-onset LVOTO or ventricular arrhythmias. In case of recurrence or persistence of symptoms, echocardiography during maneuvers such as Valsalva, standing, exercise, or postprandial should be considered to elicit or exclude late-onset LVOTO.

3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Left ventricular outflow obstruction can complicate the clinical course of a remarkable number of TTS patients, representing a dangerous liaison and one of the most challenging situations in the setting of acute cardiac care. The onset of LVOTO can lead to hemodynamic instability and cardiogenic shock, especially if in concomitance with severely reduced LV systolic function and significant MR. Beyond anatomical features such as apical ballooning and septal bulge, the identification of a specific trend of biomarkers along with the clinical and echocardiographic predictors of LVOTO might allow early recognition of a patient’s risk profile. Although the occurrence of LVOTO has been associated with a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events, the impact of LVOTO on the long-term outcome of TTS patients is still not well understood. The use of short-acting betablockers and mechanical circulatory support devices such as Impella® during the acute phase of TTS complicated by LVOTO is supported by case reports and small studies but requires further testing in larger cohorts. Moreover, the long-term management of TTS patients both with acute and late-onset LVOTO is still unclear. Clinical profiles, long-term outcomes and management of critically ill patients with TTS and LVOTO remain to date poorly investigated. TTS complicated by LVOTO might be considered an emerging phenocopy categorized in the nosography spectrum of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.D.V. and R.C.; original draft preparation, D.D.V. and R.C.; review and editing, D.D.V., A.S., M.B., G.G., C.V., G.L.C., and R.C.; figures and legends, D.D.V., A.S., M.B., and R.C.; resources A.S., G.G., C.V., and R.C. The first two authors equally contributed to the manuscript and shared the first authorship. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kurisu, S.; Sato, H.; Kawagoe, T.; Ishihara, M.; Shimatani, Y.; Nishioka, K.; Kono, Y.; Umemura, T.; Nakamura, S. Tako-tsubo-like left ventricular dysfunction due to multivessel coronary spasm. In Clinical Aspect of Myocardial Injury: From Ischemia to Heart Failure; Kodama, K., Haze, K., Hori, M., Eds.; Kagakuhyoronsha Publishing Co.: Tokyo, Japan, 1990; pp. 56–64. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Templin, C.; Ghadri, J.R.; Diekmann, J.; Napp, L.C.; Bataiosu, D.R.; Jaguszewski, M.; Cammann, V.L.; Sarcon, A.; Geyer, V.; Neumann, C.A.; et al. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 929–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sharkey, S.W.; Windenburg, D.C.; Lesser, J.R.; Maron, M.S.; Hauser, R.G.; Lesser, J.N.; Haas, T.S.; Hodges, J.S.; Maron, B.J. Natural history and expansive clinical profile of stress (tako-tsubo) cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kurisu, S.; Inoue, I.; Kawagoe, T.; Ishihara, M.; Shimatani, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Yoshida, M.; Mitsuba, N.; Hata, T.; Sato, H. Time course of electrocardiographic changes in patients with tako-tsubo syndrome: Comparison with acute myocardial infarction with minimal enzymatic release. Circ. J. 2004, 68, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Prasad, A.; Lerman, A.; Rihal, C.S. Apical ballooning syndrome (Tako-Tsubo or stress cardiomyopathy): A mimic of acute myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 2008, 155, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Napp, L.C.; Cammann, V.L.; Jaguszewski, M.; Szawan, K.A.; Wischnewsky, M.; Gili, S.; Knorr, M.; Heiner, S.; Citro, R.; Bossone, E.; et al. Coexistence and outcome of coronary artery disease in Takotsubo syndrome. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 3255–3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Citro, R.; Okura, H.; Ghadri, J.R.; Izumi, C.; Meimoun, P.; Izumo, M.; Dawson, D.; Kaji, S.; Eitel, I.; Kagiyama, N.; et al. Multimodality imaging in takotsubo syndrome: A joint consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Japanese Society of Echocardiography (JSE). J. Echocardiogr. 2020, 18, 199–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eitel, I.; von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F.; Bernhardt, P.; Carbone, I.; Muellerleile, K.; Aldrovandi, A.; Francone, M.; Desch, S.; Gutberlet, M.; Strohm, O.; et al. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. JAMA 2011, 306, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Citro, R.; Pontone, G.; Pace, L.; Zito, C.; Silverio, A.; Bossone, E.; Piscione, F. Contemporary Imaging in Takotsubo Syndrome. Heart Fail Clin. 2016, 12, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ghadri, J.R.; Wittstein, I.S.; Prasad, A.; Sharkey, S.; Dote, K.; Akashi, Y.J.; Cammann, V.L.; Crea, F.; Galiuto, L.; Desmet, W.; et al. International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part I): Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Criteria, and Pathophysiology. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 2032–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lyon, A.R.; Bossone, E.; Schneider, B.; Sechtem, U.; Citro, R.; Underwood, S.R.; Sheppard, M.N.; Figtree, G.A.; Parodi, G.; Akashi, Y.J.; et al. Current state of knowledge on Takotsubo syndrome: A Position Statement from the Taskforce on Takotsubo Syndrome of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. J. Heart Fail 2016, 18, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Citro, R.; Bossone, E.; Parodi, G.; Carerj, S.; Ciampi, Q.; Provenza, G.; Zito, C.; Prota, C.; Silverio, A.; Vriz, O.; et al. Clinical profile and in-hospital outcome of Caucasian patients with takotsubo syndrome and right ventricular involvement. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 219, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Prasad, A.; Dangas, G.; Srinivasan, M.; Yu, J.; Gersh, B.J.; Mehran, R.; Stone, G.W. Incidence and angiographic characteristics of patients with apical ballooning syndrome (takotsubo/stress cardiomyopathy) in the HORIZONS-AMI trial: An analysis from a multicenter, international study of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 2014, 83, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bybee, K.A.; Prasad, A.; Barsness, G.W.; Lerman, A.; Jaffe, A.S.; Murphy, J.G.; Wright, R.S.; Rihal, C.S. Clinical characteristics and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame counts in women with transient left ventricular apical ballooning syndrome. Am. J. Cardiol. 2004, 94, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Berton, E.; Vitali-Serdoz, L.; Vallon, P.; Maschio, M.; Gortani, G.; Benettoni, A. Young girl with apical ballooning heart syndrome. Int. J. Cardiol. 2012, 161, e4–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Otillio, J.K.; Harris, J.K.; Tuuri, R. A 6-year-old girl with undiagnosed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and takotsubo cardiomyopathy: A case report and review of the literature. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2014, 30, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wittstein, I.S.; Thiemann, D.R.; Lima, J.A.; Baughman, K.L.; Schulman, S.P.; Gerstenblith, G.; Wu, K.C.; Rade, J.J.; Bivalacqua, T.J.; Champion, H.C. Neurohumoral features of myocardial stunning due to sudden emotional stress. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Luscher, T.F.; Templin, C. Is takotsubo syndrome a microvascular acute coronary syndrome? Towards of a new definition. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 2816–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lyon, A.R.; Rees, P.S.; Prasad, S.; Poole-Wilson, P.A.; Harding, S.E. Stress (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy—A novel pathophysiological hypothesis to explain catecholamine-induced acute myocardial stunning. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2008, 5, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Collet, J.P.; Thiele, H.; Barbato, E.; Barthelemy, O.; Bauersachs, J.; Bhatt, D.L.; Dendale, P.; Dorobantu, M.; Edvardsen, T.; Folliguet, T.; et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 1289–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Di Vece, D.; Citro, R.; Cammann, V.L.; Kato, K.; Gili, S.; Szawan, K.A.; Micek, J.; Jurisic, S.; Ding, K.J.; Bacchi, B.; et al. Outcomes Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Syndrome. Circulation 2019, 139, 413–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ghadri, J.R.; Wittstein, I.S.; Prasad, A.; Sharkey, S.; Dote, K.; Akashi, Y.J.; Cammann, V.L.; Crea, F.; Galiuto, L.; Desmet, W.; et al. International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part II): Diagnostic Workup, Outcome, and Management. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 2047–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Citro, R.; Rigo, F.; D’Andrea, A.; Ciampi, Q.; Parodi, G.; Provenza, G.; Piccolo, R.; Mirra, M.; Zito, C.; Giudice, R.; et al. Echocardiographic correlates of acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and in-hospital mortality in tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014, 7, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bonello, L.; Com, O.; Ait-Moktar, O.; Theron, A.; Moro, P.J.; Salem, A.; Sbragia, P.; Paganelli, F. Ventricular arrhythmias during Tako-tsubo syndrome. Int. J. Cardiol. 2008, 128, e50–e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Syed, F.F.; Asirvatham, S.J.; Francis, J. Arrhythmia occurrence with takotsubo cardiomyopathy: A literature review. Europace 2011, 13, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gili, S.; Cammann, V.L.; Schlossbauer, S.A.; Kato, K.; D’Ascenzo, F.; Di Vece, D.; Jurisic, S.; Micek, J.; Obeid, S.; Bacchi, B.; et al. Cardiac arrest in takotsubo syndrome: Results from the InterTAK Registry. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 2142–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ding, K.J.; Cammann, V.L.; Szawan, K.A.; Stahli, B.E.; Wischnewsky, M.; Di Vece, D.; Citro, R.; Jaguszewski, M.; Seifert, B.; Sarcon, A.; et al. Intraventricular Thrombus Formation and Embolism in Takotsubo Syndrome: Insights From the International Takotsubo Registry. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020, 40, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lu, D.Y.; Caplow, J.; Quatromoni, N.; Forde-McLean, R.; Owens, A.T. Ventricular Septal Defect from Takotsubo Syndrome. Case Rep. Cardiol. 2016, 2016, 2693062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Jaguszewski, M.; Fijalkowski, M.; Nowak, R.; Czapiewski, P.; Ghadri, J.R.; Templin, C.; Rynkiewicz, A. Ventricular rupture in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. 2012, 33, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Task Force, M.; Elliott, P.M.; Anastasakis, A.; Borger, M.A.; Borggrefe, M.; Cecchi, F.; Charron, P.; Hagege, A.A.; Lafont, A.; Limongelli, G.; et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 2733–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pelliccia, F.; Alfieri, O.; Calabro, P.; Cecchi, F.; Ferrazzi, P.; Gragnano, F.; Kaski, J.P.; Limongelli, G.; Maron, M.; Rapezzi, C.; et al. Multidisciplinary evaluation and management of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 2020: Towards the HCM Heart Team. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 304, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marian, A.J.; Braunwald, E. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 749–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. La Canna, G.; Scarfo, I.; Arendar, I.; Alati, E.; Caso, I.; Alfieri, O. Phenotyping Left Ventricular Obstruction With Postprandial Re-Test Echocardiography in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2020, 125, 1688–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kobayashi, S.; Sakai, Y.; Taguchi, I.; Utsunomiya, H.; Shiota, T. Causes of an increased pressure gradient through the left ventricular outflow tract: A West Coast experience. J. Echocardiogr. 2018, 16, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. El Mahmoud, R.; Mansencal, N.; Pilliere, R.; Leyer, F.; Abbou, N.; Michaud, P.; Nallet, O.; Digne, F.; Lacombe, P.; Cattan, S.; et al. Prevalence and characteristics of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in Tako-Tsubo syndrome. Am. Heart J. 2008, 156, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Backer, O.; Debonnaire, P.; Gevaert, S.; Missault, L.; Gheeraert, P.; Muyldermans, L. Prevalence, associated factors and management implications of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in takotsubo cardiomyopathy: A two-year, two-center experience. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2014, 14, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Almendro-Delia, M.; Nunez-Gil, I.J.; Lobo, M.; Andres, M.; Vedia, O.; Sionis, A.; Martin-Garcia, A.; Cruz Aguilera, M.; Pereyra, E.; Martin de Miguel, I.; et al. Short- and Long-Term Prognostic Relevance of Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Syndrome: Results From the RETAKO Registry. JACC Heart Fail 2018, 6, 928–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Parodi, G.; Del Pace, S.; Salvadori, C.; Carrabba, N.; Olivotto, I.; Gensini, G.F.; Tuscany Registry of Tako-Tsubo, C. Left ventricular apical ballooning syndrome as a novel cause of acute mitral regurgitation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 50, 647–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sherrid, M.V.; Gunsburg, D.Z.; Moldenhauer, S.; Pearle, G. Systolic anterior motion begins at low left ventricular outflow tract velocity in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000, 36, 1344–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sherrid, M.V.; Riedy, K.; Rosenzweig, B.; Massera, D.; Saric, M.; Swistel, D.G.; Ahluwalia, M.; Arabadjian, M.; DeFonte, M.; Stepanovic, A.; et al. Distinctive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Anatomy and Obstructive Physiology in Patients Admitted With Takotsubo Syndrome. Am. J. Cardiol. 2020, 125, 1700–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dahhan, A.; Mohammad, A.; Kapoor, D.; Sharma, G.K. Hypotension due to dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after percutaneous coronary intervention. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 2011, 38, 723–726. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kato, K.; Di Vece, D.; Cammann, V.L.; Micek, J.; Szawan, K.A.; Bacchi, B.; Luscher, T.F.; Ruschitzka, F.; Ghadri, J.R.; Templin, C.; et al. Takotsubo Recurrence: Morphological Types and Triggers and Identification of Risk Factors. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 982–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Santoro, F.; Ieva, R.; Ferraretti, A.; Fanelli, M.; Musaico, F.; Tarantino, N.; Martino, L.D.; Gennaro, L.D.; Caldarola, P.; Biase, M.D.; et al. Hemodynamic Effects, Safety, and Feasibility of Intravenous Esmolol Infusion During Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy With Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: Results From A Multicenter Registry. Cardiovasc Ther. 2016, 34, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gassanov, N.; Er, F. The Role of Ultrarapid Acting Betablocker Esmolol and Landiolol in Critically Ill Patients. Dtsch Med. Wochenschr 2019, 144, 1280–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Attisano, T.; Silverio, A.; Prota, C.; Briguori, C.; Galasso, G.; Citro, R. Impella in Takotsubo syndrome complicated by left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and severe mitral regurgitation. ESC Heart Fail 2020, 7, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yalta, K.; Yilmaztepe, M.; Ozkalayci, F.; Ucar, F. Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy may lead to permanent changes in left ventricular geometry: Potential implications in the setting of pre-existing myocardial disease? Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 202, 889–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fu, H.; Jiao, Z.; Chen, K.; Liu, T.; Li, G. Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in recovery process of stress cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 214, 202–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yalta, K.; Yetkin, E. Late-onset dynamic outflow tract gradient in the setting of tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy: An interesting phenomenon with potential implications? Indian Heart J. 2017, 69, 328–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schwarz, K.; Ahearn, T.; Srinivasan, J.; Neil, C.J.; Scally, C.; Rudd, A.; Jagpal, B.; Frenneaux, M.P.; Pislaru, C.; Horowitz, J.D.; et al. Alterations in Cardiac Deformation, Timing of Contraction and Relaxation, and Early Myocardial Fibrosis Accompany the Apparent Recovery of Acute Stress-Induced (Takotsubo) Cardiomyopathy: An End to the Concept of Transience. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2017, 30, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jcm 10 03235 g001 550
Figure 1. Apical 4-chamber view: in telediastole (A), in telesystole (B) showing apical ballooning (see arrows) in TTS on day 1; in telediastole (C), in telesystole (D) showing normal apical contractility on day 6. Left ventriculography (RAO 30°) in telediastole (E), in telesystole (F) on day 1 showing apical ballooning and hypercontractility of basal segments resembling typical Japanese octopus pot. RAO: right anterior oblique.
Figure 1. Apical 4-chamber view: in telediastole (A), in telesystole (B) showing apical ballooning (see arrows) in TTS on day 1; in telediastole (C), in telesystole (D) showing normal apical contractility on day 6. Left ventriculography (RAO 30°) in telediastole (E), in telesystole (F) on day 1 showing apical ballooning and hypercontractility of basal segments resembling typical Japanese octopus pot. RAO: right anterior oblique.
Jcm 10 03235 g001
Jcm 10 03235 g002 550
Figure 2. Panel (A) TTE with zoom on left ventricle outflow tract showing systolic anterior movement of anterior mitral leaflet during systole (see arrow); (B) Color M-Mode showing strong blood acceleration through left ventricle outflow tract in telesystole (see arrow); (C) CW-Doppler at TTE showing intraventricular peak gradient of 63 mmHg (see arrow); (D) TTE with zoom on left ventricle outflow tract showing absence of systolic anterior movement of anterior mitral leaflet during systole at recovery on day 6; (E) Color M-Mode showing regular blood acceleration through left ventricle outflow tract in telesystole at recovery; (F) CW-Doppler at TTE showing resolution of intraventricular gradient at recovery in the same patient. TTE: transthoracic echocardiography; CW: continuous wave.
Figure 2. Panel (A) TTE with zoom on left ventricle outflow tract showing systolic anterior movement of anterior mitral leaflet during systole (see arrow); (B) Color M-Mode showing strong blood acceleration through left ventricle outflow tract in telesystole (see arrow); (C) CW-Doppler at TTE showing intraventricular peak gradient of 63 mmHg (see arrow); (D) TTE with zoom on left ventricle outflow tract showing absence of systolic anterior movement of anterior mitral leaflet during systole at recovery on day 6; (E) Color M-Mode showing regular blood acceleration through left ventricle outflow tract in telesystole at recovery; (F) CW-Doppler at TTE showing resolution of intraventricular gradient at recovery in the same patient. TTE: transthoracic echocardiography; CW: continuous wave.
Jcm 10 03235 g002
Jcm 10 03235 g003 550
Figure 3. Management of patients with Takotsubo syndrome and hypotension. LVOTO: left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; MCS: mechanical circulatory support; VA-ECMO: veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IABP: intra-aortic balloon pump (or intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation). * If acute coronary syndrome has not yet been ruled out, patients should undergo coronary angiography first. Slow pullback of pigtail catheter from left ventricular (LV) cavity allows early invasive assessment of intraventricular pressure gradients and can rule out LVOTO [7]. # Careful fluid administration should occur in consideration of LV ejection fraction and only in absence of acute heart failure with pulmonary oedema. § Ventricular thrombus and severe pulmonary congestion should be excluded, alternatively consider VA-ECMO.
Figure 3. Management of patients with Takotsubo syndrome and hypotension. LVOTO: left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; MCS: mechanical circulatory support; VA-ECMO: veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IABP: intra-aortic balloon pump (or intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation). * If acute coronary syndrome has not yet been ruled out, patients should undergo coronary angiography first. Slow pullback of pigtail catheter from left ventricular (LV) cavity allows early invasive assessment of intraventricular pressure gradients and can rule out LVOTO [7]. # Careful fluid administration should occur in consideration of LV ejection fraction and only in absence of acute heart failure with pulmonary oedema. § Ventricular thrombus and severe pulmonary congestion should be excluded, alternatively consider VA-ECMO.
Jcm 10 03235 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Vece, D.; Silverio, A.; Bellino, M.; Galasso, G.; Vecchione, C.; La Canna, G.; Citro, R. Dynamic Left Intraventricular Obstruction Phenotype in Takotsubo Syndrome. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3235. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153235

AMA Style

Di Vece D, Silverio A, Bellino M, Galasso G, Vecchione C, La Canna G, Citro R. Dynamic Left Intraventricular Obstruction Phenotype in Takotsubo Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(15):3235. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153235

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Vece, Davide, Angelo Silverio, Michele Bellino, Gennaro Galasso, Carmine Vecchione, Giovanni La Canna, and Rodolfo Citro. 2021. "Dynamic Left Intraventricular Obstruction Phenotype in Takotsubo Syndrome" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 15: 3235. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop