Next Article in Journal
Recurrence after Curative Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: How to Predict the Chance of Repeat Hepatectomy?
Next Article in Special Issue
Fasting Normoglycemia after Intravenous Thrombolysis Predicts Favorable Long-Term Outcome in Non-Diabetic Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Previous Article in Journal
Metronomic Therapy in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Frailty in Geriatric Patients as a Prognostic Factor in Endovascular Treated Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 13
10.3390/jcm10132819
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Advanced Neuroimaging Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Is Safe and Effective

by
Klearchos Psychogios
1,2,*,
Apostolos Safouris
1,2,
Odysseas Kargiotis
1,
Georgios Magoufis
1,
Athina Andrikopoulou
1,
Ermioni Papageorgiou
1,
Maria Chondrogianni
1,2,
Georgios Papadimitropoulos
1,
Eftihia Polyzogopoulou
3,
Stavros Spiliopoulos
4,
Elias Brountzos
4,
Elefterios Stamboulis
1,
Sotirios Giannopoulos
2 and
Georgios Tsivgoulis
2
1
Acute Stroke Unit, Metropolitan Hospital, Ethnarhou Makariou 9, 18547 Piraeus, Greece
2
Second Department of Neurology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, “Attikon” University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
3
Emergency Medicine Clinic, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, “Attikon” University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
4
Second Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Unit, “ATTIKON” University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(13), 2819; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132819
Submission received: 31 May 2021 / Revised: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 24 June 2021 / Published: 26 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Advanced neuroimaging is one of the most important means that we have in the attempt to overcome time constraints and expand the use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We assessed whether, and how, the prior use of advanced neuroimaging (AN), and more specifically CT/MR perfusion post-processed with RAPID software, regardless of time from symptoms onset, affected the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who received IVT. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive AIS patients who received intravenous thrombolysis monotherapy (without endovascular reperfusion) during a six-year period. The study population was divided into two groups according to the neuroimaging protocol used prior to IVT administration in AIS patients (AN+ vs. AN−). Safety outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and 3-month mortality. Effectiveness outcomes included door-to-needle time, neurological status (NIHSS-score) on discharge, and functional status at three months assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results. The rate of IVT monotherapy increased from ten patients per year (n = 29) in the AN− to fifteen patients per year (n = 47) in the AN+ group. Although the onset-to-treatment time was longer in the AN+ cohort, the two groups did not differ in door-to-needle time, discharge NIHSS-score, symptomatic ICH, any ICH, 3-month favorable functional outcome (mRS-scores of 0–1), 3-month functional independence (mRS-scores of 0–2), distribution of 3-month mRS-scores, or 3-month mortality. Conclusion. Our pilot observational study showed that the incorporation of advanced neuroimaging in the acute stroke chain pathway in AIS patients increases the yield of IVT administration without affecting the effectiveness and safety of the treatment.

1. Introduction

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) administered within the first 4.5 hours following symptom onset remains the mainstay of acute reperfusion therapies [1,2,3]. Despite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) effectiveness, only a small number of AIS patients worldwide benefit from IVT [4,5]. Short therapeutic time window, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria of the pivotal randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), as well as health care system disparities, such as public awareness on how to act in case of stroke symptoms, organization of emergency medical services, and the paucity of organized stroke centers in rural areas [6], have been significant barriers to overcome. Nevertheless, off-label use of IVT [7,8] is increasingly incorporated in the everyday clinical practice of many stroke practitioners.
Advanced neuroimaging may help us overcome time constraints and expand the implementation of acute reperfusion therapies [9]. CT and MR perfusion with automated post-processing software (RAPID, iSchemaView, Menlo Park, CA, USA) have proven effective in recent RCTs, for both mechanical thrombectomy candidates in the late time window (6–24 h) [10,11] and for IVT (4.5–9 h and wake-up patients) [12,13,14]. Advanced neuroimaging provides a ”brain physiology snapshot in time” that can guide decisions for recanalization therapies in clinical practice [15]. Numerous stroke centers and stroke units worldwide have incorporated the use of CT and MR perfusion in their acute therapeutic pathways.
In view of the former considerations, we assessed the differences in the use of IVT monotherapy and the outcomes of the AIS patients with or without the use of advanced neuroimaging.

2. Materials and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive AIS patients who received IVT admitted to our European Stroke Organization certified stroke unit. We also participate in the SITS (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke) and RES-Q (Registry of Stroke Care Quality) international registries [16,17]. Patients were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) aged over 18 years old; (2) clinically diagnosed with AIS with a measurable neurologic deficit on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) presenting within the 4.5 h window from symptom onset; (3) AIS patients were considered eligible for the extended time window of 4.5–9 h if they presented after 4.5 h and sooner than 9 h from last-seen-well (late window patients), according to the clinical and neuroimaging inclusion criteria of the EXTEND trial [10]; (4) AIS patients who woke up with symptoms of stroke («wake-up stroke») were treated according to the WAKE-UP trial [18] protocol; and (5) AIS patients treated with IVT monotherapy. All patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were excluded. Transient ischemic attacks and stroke mimics were excluded from the current study based on clinical and neuroimaging criteria.
The study population was divided into two different groups according to the neuroimaging protocol used on admission and prior to IVT administration in AIS patients (with prior Advanced Neuroimaging (AN+) vs. without prior advanced neuroimaging (AN−)). Of note, the neuroimaging protocol was modified in our center on December 2017 after the introduction of perfusion imaging (with RAPID software) and on August 2018 after the publication of the WAKE-UP trial. Patients in the first study group (AN−) underwent baseline emergent neurovascular imaging using either non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT), with or without CT angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance angiography based on the treating physician’s decision. Patients in the second study group (AN+) underwent NCCT/CTA/computed tomography perfusion (CTA/CTP) or magnetic resonance angiography/magnetic resonance perfusion (MRA/MRP) unless they presented certain contraindications (e.g., renal insufficiency, severe allergic reactions to iodinised agents, etc.). CT perfusion was performed using two continuous 2.5 cm slabs, starting at the level of the circle of Willis for most patients, lower for those presenting with symptoms suggesting posterior fossa ischemia, and higher for those presenting with symptoms suggestive of cortical ischemia. Ischemic core (rCBF < 30%), critically hypoperfused ischemic region (Tmax > 6 s), and mismatch volume corresponding to ischemic penumbra, were estimated by using RAPID as previously described [19]. The hyperdense vessel sign (HVS), a highly specific marker of arterial obstruction [20], was identified on non-contrast CT if the lumen of any, non-calcified, intracranial artery appeared denser than adjacent or equivalent contralateral arteries. Clot length was quantified based on CT angiography by using standard methodology [21]. The LVO was defined as the occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA), basilar artery (BA), and the first segment of the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA-M1). CT/MR findings were interpreted and extracted independently by experienced neurologists or neuroradiologists that were blinded to clinical outcomes.
The following parameters were recorded for all included patients: (1) demographic characteristics; (2) history of vascular risk factors (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, current smoking, hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, congestive heart failure, and valvular disease) as previously described [22]; (3) prior history of stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA); (4) laboratory test values on admission (total platelet count, glucose, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels); and (5) admission systolic and diastolic blood pressures, measured using automated blood pressure cuffs. Stroke severity was assessed with the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) score at admission, 2 h and 24 h post IVT, and at discharge. Safety outcomes included prevalence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), prevalence of any intracranial hemorrhage in the 24-h post thrombolysis neuroimaging studies, and 3-month mortality. sICH was defined using standard SITS registry definitions (local or remote parenchymatous hemorrhage type 2 combined with an NIHSS-score increase of >4 points or leading to death\22–36 h) [14]. Any intracranial hemorrhage was recorded according to the ECASS criteria [23]. Effectiveness outcomes included door-to-needle time, neurological improvement at 24 h and on discharge, and functional status at discharge and at 3 months by using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Functional independence (FI) and favorable functional outcome (FFO) were defined as an mRS-score of 0–2 or an mRS-score of 0–1 at 3 months, respectively. Stroke severity and functional outcome (mRS) at discharge and at 3 months were assessed by certified vascular neurologists as previously described [24].
All follow-up evaluations occurred at 90 ± 10 days from symptom onset at the Stroke Outpatient Clinic of our institution as previously described [25]. The evaluation of the mRS-score was performed by certified vascular neurologists who were unaware of the neuroimaging protocol that was implemented at baseline.

Statistical Analysis

All binary variables were presented as percentages, while continuous variables were presented with their corresponding mean values and standard deviations (SDs), in cases of normal distributions, or as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) in cases of skewed distributions. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were performed using the unpaired t test, Mann–Whitney U-test, χ2 test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The distribution of the 3-month mRS scores between patients treated before and after RAPID implementation was compared using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test and the univariable/multivariable ordinal logistic regression (shift analysis).
All efficacy and safety outcomes of interest were further assessed in univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models adjusting for the a priori defined confounders of the age and baseline NIHSS-score. The final variables that were independently associated in the multivariable logistic and the ordinal regression analyses with the outcome of interest, were selected using an alpha value of 0.05 and adjusted associations were provided as odds ratios (ORs) or common odds ratios (cORs), with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
All statistical analyses were conducted with the Stata Statistical Software Release 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

A total of eight hundred and nineteen patients were screened in the setting of an acute stroke code between February 2015 and January 2021. The complete flowchart of our study is shown in Figure 1. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were screened before December 2017 (AN implementation) and twenty-six received IVT, whereas four hundred and forty-two were screened after December 2017 and fifty patients among them received IVT (three of them were not screened with prior AN due to contraindications). Our final cohort was comprised of 76 AIS patients who received IVT throughout the entire study period. All patients who received endovascular reperfusion therapy with mechanical thrombectomy were excluded from our analysis (n = 71). Twenty-nine patients received IVT without prior advanced neuroimaging (AN−) and forty-seven patients with the use of advanced neuroimaging (AN+). The rate of IVT monotherapy increased from ten patients per year in the AN− to fifteen patients per year in the AN+ group. Baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups are summarized in Table 1. Patients in the AN+ group were significantly (p = 0.003) older than patients in the AN− group (mean age 73 years vs. 63 years, respectively). Median admission NIHSS-scores were 4 points (IQR: 2–7) in the AN− group and 5 points (IQR: 4–9) in the AN+ group, a difference that was also significant (p = 0.047). The prevalence of large vessel occlusions was 17.2% in the AN− group and 19.1% in the AN+ group (p = 0.835). The location of stroke in posterior circulation was more frequent in the AN− group (34.5%) than in the second study group (19.1%). The median elapsed time between symptom onset (or last-seen-well) to initiation of IVT was significantly longer in the second group (198 min (IQR: 151–240)) in AN+ vs. 121 min ((IQR: 130–220) in AN−; p < 0.001), whereas the door-to-needle time was almost identical between the two groups (median 44 min (IQR: 36–60)) in AN− vs. 45 min ((IQR: 30–61) in AN+; p = 0.956). The rate of patients treated according to the EXTEND trial or WAKE-UP protocol was significantly higher in the second study group (23.4% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.020). All patients were treated with alteplase, except for four patients in the AN+ with large vessel occlusions who were treated with tenecteplase.
The neuroimaging characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. The median thrombus length tended to be higher in the AN+ group (12 vs. 9 mm, p = 0.053). The median ASPECTS score and the presence of a hyperdense vessel sign were similar across the study groups. MR imaging was performed in 6.9% of AN− and 10.3% of AN+ patients (p = 0.584). In patients who underwent perfusion imaging, the mean ischemic core volume was calculated at 2.1 ± 1.2 mL and the mean volume of critical hypoperfusion was 16.3 ± 4.0 mL (Table 2).
Table 3 summarizes the effectiveness and the safety outcomes in the two patient groups. There was only one missing 3-month follow-up evaluation in each treatment group. Neurological status assessed by NIHSS at 2 h, 24 h, and at hospital discharge was similar between the two groups. The rates of sICH (3.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.2) and any intracranial hemorrhage (6.9% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.584) were similar between the two groups. The rates of 3-month favorable functional outcome (75% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.746), 3-month functional independence (82.1% vs. 89.1%; p = 0.394), and 3-month mortality (0% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.263) did not differ between the two groups either. A secondary analysis restricted to the patients in the early time window shows similar results (Supplemental Table S1).
The distribution of 3-month mRS-scores was similar between the two groups (p for Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test: 0.466). Table 4 shows the univariable and multivariable associations of the neuroimaging protocol with safety and efficacy outcomes in multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for the age and admission NIHSS-score. There was no association between the advanced neuroimaging protocol and any ICH (crude OR 1.60, 95% CI: 0.29–8.88; p = 0.586), functional independence at three months (crude OR 1.78, 95% CI: 0.47–6.8; p = 0.398), and favorable functional outcome at three months (crude OR 1.20, 95% CI: 0.40–3.63; p = 0.747). In adjusted analysis AN was associated with better functional independence at 3 months (adjusted OR 12.89, 95% CI: 1.47–113; p = 0.021).

4. Discussion

Our pilot observational single-center study showed that the shift in our clinical practice, with the incorporation of advanced neuroimaging in AIS patients, increases the yield of IVT administration by approximately 50% without major effectiveness and safety repercussions. On the contrary, all comparisons showed that it is equally safe, and even in a population with more negative prognostic factors (higher admission NIHSS-score, older age, longer thrombus), we documented a trend towards better functional outcomes without any delays in door-to-needle time. Better outcomes in patients with prior AN possibly reflect the comparison between different study periods and the accumulating experience of the stroke team through the years. It might also encompass the more favorable prognosis of patients treated in the extended time window, already proven by large clinical trials [12]. However, this result should be treated with caution given the large confidence intervals due to our small study sample and the fact that it was not demonstrated in the crude analysis as well.
Almost 25% of patients in the advanced neuroimaging group were treated based on neuroimaging criteria (either extended time window 4.5–9 h or wake-up strokes, see Figure 2) and this further substantiates our previous observations [20]. Considering that the extra time needed to perform the CT perfusion and to acquire the RAPID templates is at least ten min, it is striking that the median door-to-needle time was only one min longer in the advanced neuroimaging group compared to the median door-to-needle time in the standard neuroimaging group. This observation reflects the interplay of many other important key factors: the acquired experience of the personnel who are involved in the acute stroke chain, the increased use of perfusion imaging particularly in “borderline” cases (e.g., stroke mimics) [26] that otherwise would necessitate two different imaging modalities (CT and MRI), and the fact that the clinical decision in most cases was made immediately after the non-contrast CT and IVT could be initiated in the radiology department before completion of the perfusion imaging.
The present study investigated the effect of advanced neuroimaging on IVT monotherapy. Patients who received endovascular reperfusion therapy were excluded from our analyses. Consequently, our cohort included predominantly mild to moderate severity strokes with a small ischemic core and penumbra volumes or patients with LVO who responded to IVT with successful reperfusion and did not need further endovascular treatment. This probably induces a selection bias by excluding AIS patients with a more “unfavorable prognosis”. Previous studies [27,28] that served as pilot studies for the major MT RCTs, have underscored the feasibility of this physiologic imaging approach in cases with LVO-attributed ischemic stroke. Major RCTs that also used the same approach in the early time window [29,30] showed even greater treatment effects, substantially enhancing the use of this approach in clinical practice.
The use of perfusion imaging in AIS patients who present in the first 4.5 h after symptoms onset is still controversial. In our cohort, patients who did not present with a favorable profile (based on neuroimaging criteria) in the early time window, were still offered tPA according to current recommendations. The majority of these patients (n = 19) had no ischemic core or had only hypoperfusion that did not meet the Tmax > 6 s typical criteria of the penumbra. Some of these patients (4/19, 21%) had a “benign oligemia” profile with Tmax prolongation > 4 s, but with either ongoing clinical symptoms or symptoms in partial resolution. This could be due to technical issues (lesion outside the selected slabs when CT perfusion was used), lacunar infarcts [31], spontaneous recanalization before imaging, or small lesions in the posterior circulation [32] where CT perfusion has lower sensitivity. However, it may also imply that among the “benign oligemia” regions, there might exist grey zones close to the Tmax 6 s threshold delay that correspond more to critical hypoperfused areas, and which, if left untreated, may lead to permanent neurological deficits. Indeed, the DEFUSE study [33] showed that among patients who did not experience early reperfusion, Tmax > 4 s threshold was more accurate in predicting final infarct volume. Even though Tmax > 6 s has been proven to be the best perfusion measurement marker in predicting clinical outcome [34,35] after successful recanalization, infarct growth is perhaps a more complex process influenced by many clinical and pathological factors.
Based on current knowledge, perfusion imaging may not be critical for therapeutic decisions in the early time window by excluding patients with large ischemic core or those with no or minimal perfusion deficit. For instance, the “too good to treat” pattern [36] of small distal perfusion lesions with no vessel occlusion, needs to be studied in larger populations and with more potent thrombolytic agents, including tenecteplase. Even though time since last-seen-well is a poor proxy for perfusion status, we are far from changing the paradigm of IVT administration and endovascular treatment in the early time window from time-based to imaging-based. Nevertheless, in the era of precision medicine and shared decision-making [37], perfusion imaging may still provide additional support to the clinician: for instance, to communicate the decisions with the patient and the patient proxies, strengthen the diagnostic confidence by excluding stroke mimics, accelerate the processes in fast-progressors, and possibly, predict prognosis.
Certain limitations of the present pilot study need to be acknowledged including the single-center retrospective design and analysis of a prospectively maintained patient database, the relatively small sample size, the lack of randomization, and blinding in the evaluation of clinical outcomes. In addition, a major limitation is the heterogeneity induced by the comparison of data from different time periods where practices and experiences of the involved personnel are changing and protocols are reviewed and updated periodically.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the implementation of advanced neuroimaging in unselected AIS patients receiving reperfusion monotherapy with IVT, results in an increase of tPA administration rates without delaying door-to-needle time and without raising safety or effectiveness concerns.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10132819/s1, Table S1: Outcomes in patients treated before and after the implementation of AN, confined in patients treated with IVT during the early time window.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P. and G.T.; writing—original draft preparation, K.P. and G.T.; writing—review and editing, K.P., A.S., O.K., G.M., A.A., Ermioni Papageorgiou (E.P.), M.C., G.P., Eftihia Polyzogopoulou (E.P.), S.S., E.B., E.S., S.G. and G.T.; visualization, G.T.; supervision, K.P. and G.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study as per current Greek law regarding retrospective studies of anonymized standard care data. No Internal Review Board approval and no written consent were required but patients were informed of their participation and offered the possibility to withdraw.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained regarding the use of imaging data.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berge, E.; Whiteley, W.; Audebert, H.; De Marchis, G.M.; Fonseca, A.C.; Padiglioni, C.; de la Ossa, N.P.; Strbian, D.; Tsivgoulis, G.; Turc, G. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur. Stroke J. 2021, 6, 1–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Powers, W.J.; Rabinstein, A.A.; Ackerson, T.; Adeoye, O.M.; Bambakidis, N.C.; Becker, K.; Biller, J.; Brown, M.; Demaerschalk, B.M.; Hoh, B.; et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019, 50, e344–e418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tsivgoulis, G.; Kargiotis, O.; Alexandrov, A.V. Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A bridge between two centuries. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2017, 17, 819–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eissa, A.; Krass, I.; Levi, C.; Sturm, J.; Ibrahim, R.; Bajorek, B. Understanding the reasons behind the low utilisation of thrombolysis in stroke. Australas. Med. J. 2013, 6, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Sousa, D.A.; Von Martial, R.; Abilleira, S.; Gattringer, T.; Kobayashi, A.; Gallofré, M.; Fazekas, F.; Szikora, I.; Feigin, V.; Caso, V.; et al. Access to and delivery of acute ischaemic stroke treatments: A survey of national scientific societies and stroke experts in 44 European countries. Eur. Stroke J. 2019, 4, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Soto-Cámara, R.; González-Santos, J.; González-Berna, J.; Trejo-Gabriel-Galán, J.M. Factors associated with a rapid call for assistance for patients with ischemic stroke. Emergencias 2020, 32, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tsivgoulis, G.; Kargiotis, O.; De Marchis, G.; Kohrmann, M.; Sandset, E.C.; Karapanayiotides, T.; de Sousa, D.A.; Sarraj, A.; Safouris, A.; Psychogios, K.; et al. Off-label use of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A critical appraisal of randomized and real-world evidence. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2021, 14, 1756286421997368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tsivgoulis, G.; Safouris, A.; Alexandrov, A.V. Safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in specific conditions. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2015, 14, 845–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tsivgoulis, G.; Katsanos, A.H.; Schellinger, P.D.; Köhrmann, M.; Caso, V.; Palaiodimou, L.; Magoufis, G.; Arthur, A.; Fischer, U.; Alexandrov, A.V. Advanced Neuroimaging in Stroke Patient Selection for Mechanical Thrombectomy. Stroke 2018, 49, 3067–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nogueira, R.G.; Jadhav, A.P.; Haussen, D.C.; Bonafe, A.; Budzik, R.F.; Bhuva, P.; Yavagal, D.R.; Ribo, M.; Cognard, C.; Hanel, R.A.; et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Albers, G.W.; Marks, M.P.; Kemp, S.; Christensen, S.; Tsai, J.P.; Ortega-Gutierrez, S.; McTaggart, R.A.; Torbey, M.T.; Kim-Tenser, M.; Leslie-Mazwi, T.; et al. Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 708–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, H.; Campbell, B.C.V.; Parsons, M.W.; Churilov, L.; Levi, C.R.; Hsu, C.; Kleinig, T.J.; Wijeratne, T.; Curtze, S.; Dewey, H.M.; et al. Thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging up to 9 hours after onset of stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1795–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Campbell, B.C.V.; Ma, H.; Ringleb, P.A.; Parsons, M.W.; Churilov, L.; Bendszus, M.; Levi, C.R.; Hsu, C.; Kleinig, T.J.; Fatar, M.; et al. Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2019, 394, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Thomalla, G.; Boutitie, F.; Ma, H.; Koga, M.; Ringleb, P.; Schwamm, L.H.; Wu, O.; Bendszus, M.; Bladin, C.F.; Campbell, B.C.V.; et al. Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2020, 396, 1574–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hill, M.D.; Goyal, M.; Demchuk, A.M.; Fisher, M. Ischemic Stroke Tissue-Window in the New Era of Endovascular Treatment. Stroke 2015, 46, 2332–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Tsivgoulis, G.; Kargiotis, O.; Rudolf, J.; Komnos, A.; Tavernarakis, A.; Karapanayiotides, T.; Ellul, J.; Katsanos, A.H.; Giannopoulos, S.; Gryllia, M.; et al. Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Greece: The Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke registry 15-year experience. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2018, 11, 1756286418783578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tsivgoulis, G.; Goyal, N.; Mikulik, R.; Sharma, V.K.; Katsanos, A.H.; Zand, R.; Paliwal, P.R.; Roussopoulou, A.; Volny, O.; Pandhi, A.; et al. Eligibility for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: A phase IV multi-center screening log registry. J. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 371, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thomalla, G.; Simonsen, C.Z.; Boutitie, F.; Andersen, G.; Berthezene, Y.; Cheng, B.; Cheripelli, B.; Cho, T.-H.; Fazekas, F.; Fiehler, J.; et al. MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset. New Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Psychogios, K.; Magoufis, G.; Safouris, A.; Kargiotis, O.; Katsanos, A.H.; Spiliopoulos, S.; Papageorgiou, E.; Palaiodimou, L.; Brountzos, E.; Stamboulis, E.; et al. Eligibility for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting in the 4.5–9 h window. Neuroradiology 2020, 62, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mair, G.; Boyd, E.V.; Chappell, F.M.; Von Kummer, R.; Lindley, R.I.; Sandercock, P.; Wardlaw, J.M.; IST-3 Collaborative Group. Sensitivity and Specificity of the Hyperdense Artery Sign for Arterial Obstruction in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2015, 46, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Riedel, C.H.; Jensen, U.; Rohr, A.; Ulmer, S.; Tietke, M.; Alfke, K.; Jansen, O. Assessment of thrombus in acute stroke using ultra-thin slice nonenhanced CT reconstructions. Stroke 2010, 41, 1659–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Psychogios, K.; Palaiodimou, L.; Katsanos, A.H.; Magoufis, G.; Safouris, A.; Kargiotis, O.; Spiliopoulos, S.; Papageorgiou, E.; Theodorou, A.; Voumvourakis, K.; et al. Real-world comparative safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2021, 14, 1756286420986727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fiorelli, M.; Bastianello, S.; Von Kummer, R.; Del Zoppo, G.J.; Larrue, V.; Lesaffre, E.; Ringleb, A.P.; Lorenzano, S.; Manelfe, C.; Bozzao, L. Hemorrhagic Transformation Within 36 Hours of a Cerebral Infarct: Relationships with early clinical deterioration and 3-month outcome in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study I (ECASS I) cohort. Stroke 1999, 30, 2280–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Goyal, N.; Tsivgoulis, G.; Pandhi, A.; Dillard, K.; Katsanos, A.H.; Magoufis, G.; Chang, J.J.; Zand, R.; Hoit, D.; Safouris, A.; et al. Admission hyperglycemia and outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2018, 10, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tsivgoulis, G.; Goyal, N.; Katsanos, A.H.; Malhotra, K.; Ishfaq, M.F.; Pandhi, A.; Frohler, M.T.; Spiotta, A.M.; Anadani, M.; Psychogios, M.; et al. Intravenous thrombolysis for large vessel or distal occlusions presenting with mild stroke severity. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020, 27, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Psychogios, K.; Kargiotis, O.; Safouris, A.; Magoufis, G.; Gelagoti, M.; Bonakis, A.; Stamboulis, E.; Tsivgoulis, G. Perfusion imaging averting intravenous thrombolysis in stroke mimics. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 10, 2591–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Turk, A.S.; Nyberg, E.M.; Chaudry, M.I.; Turner, R.D.; Magarik, J.A.; Nicholas, J.S.; Holmstedt, C.A.; Chalela, J.A.; Hays, A.; Lazaridis, C.; et al. Utilization of CT perfusion patient selection for mechanical thrombectomy irrespective of time: A comparison of functional outcomes and complications. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2012, 5, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Turk, A.; Magarik, J.A.; Chaudry, I.; Turner, R.D.; Nicholas, J.; Holmstedt, C.A.; Chalela, J.; Hays, A.; Lazaridis, C.; Jauch, E.; et al. CT perfusion-guided patient selection for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is safe and effective. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2011, 4, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Campbell, B.; Mitchell, P.J.; Kleinig, T.; Dewey, H.M.; Churilov, L.; Yassi, N.; Yan, B.; Dowling, R.J.; Parsons, M.W.; Oxley, T.; et al. Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging Selection. New Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Saver, J.L.; Goyal, M.; Bonafe, A.; Diener, H.-C.; Levy, E.I.; Pereira, V.M.; Albers, G.W.; Cognard, C.; Cohen, D.J.; Hacke, W.; et al. Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy after Intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA Alone in Stroke. New Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 2285–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rudilosso, S.; Urra, X.; Román, L.S.; Laredo, C.; López-Rueda, A.; Amaro, S.; Oleaga, L.; Chamorro, Á. Perfusion Deficits and Mismatch in Patients with Acute Lacunar Infarcts Studied with Whole-Brain CT Perfusion. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015, 36, 1407–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ostman, C.; Garcia-Esperon, C.; Lillicrap, T.; Tomari, S.; Holliday, E.; Levi, C.; Bivard, A.; Parsons, M.W.; Spratt, N.J. Multimodal Computed Tomography Increases the Detection of Posterior Fossa Strokes Compared to Brain Non-contrast Computed Tomography. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 588064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Olivot, J.-M.; Mlynash, M.; Thijs, V.N.; Kemp, S.; Lansberg, M.G.; Wechsler, L.; Bammer, R.; Marks, M.P.; Albers, G.W. Optimal Tmax Threshold for Predicting Penumbral Tissue in Acute Stroke. Stroke 2009, 40, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bivard, A.; Levi, C.; Spratt, N.; Parsons, M. Perfusion CT in Acute Stroke: A Comprehensive Analysis of Infarct and Penumbra. Radiology 2013, 267, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wheeler, H.M.; Mlynash, M.; Inoue, M.; Tipirneni, A.; Liggins, J.; Zaharchuk, G.; Straka, M.; Kemp, S.; Bammer, R.; Lansberg, M.G.; et al. Early Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion-Weighted Imaging Lesion Volumes Forecast Final Infarct Size in DEFUSE 2. Stroke 2013, 44, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bivard, A.; Lou, M.; Levi, C.R.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Cheng, X.; Aviv, R.I.; McElduff, P.; Lin, L.; Kleinig, T.; O’Brien, B.; et al. Too good to treat? ischemic stroke patients with small computed tomography perfusion lesions may not benefit from thrombolysis. Ann. Neurol. 2016, 80, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tikkinen, K.A.O.; Guyatt, G.H. Understanding of research results, evidence summaries and their applicability—not critical appraisal—are core skills of medical curriculum. BMJ Evid. Based Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 10 02819 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study population. Acute Ischemic Stroke, AIS; Large vessel occlusion, LVO; intravenous thrombolysis, IVT; Advanced Neuroimaging, AN.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study population. Acute Ischemic Stroke, AIS; Large vessel occlusion, LVO; intravenous thrombolysis, IVT; Advanced Neuroimaging, AN.
Jcm 10 02819 g001
Jcm 10 02819 g002 550
Figure 2. This is an illustrative case of a patient fulfilling both neuroimaging and clinical EXTEND eligibility criteria who was treated successfully with intravenous thrombolysis in the extended time window. An 80-year-old woman was transferred from an island to the emergency department 5 h after an acute onset of expressive aphasia, mild right facial paresis, and mild right upper arm paresis (ΝΙHSS score 9 points). (a) Her CT-perfusion mismatch map post-processed with RAPID software demonstrated a hypoperfused region of 11 mL in the Broca’s area (shown in green) and no area of reduced cerebral blood flow, resulting in a 11 mL mismatch difference (infinite mismatch ratio). (b,c) CT angiogram revealed no large vessel occlusion. The patient fulfilled all EXTEND eligibility criteria; IVT with alteplase started 5 h and 45 min after symptom onset with partial resolution of symptoms at the end of tPA infusion (NIHSS-score of 6 points). (d) Repeat MRI at 24 h demonstrated a small insular infarct and another acute infarct in the left temporoparietal region which was captured in the Tmax maps of initial perfusion imaging as Tmax > 4 s prolongation (c/arrow). The patient’s mRS-score at three months was 0.
Figure 2. This is an illustrative case of a patient fulfilling both neuroimaging and clinical EXTEND eligibility criteria who was treated successfully with intravenous thrombolysis in the extended time window. An 80-year-old woman was transferred from an island to the emergency department 5 h after an acute onset of expressive aphasia, mild right facial paresis, and mild right upper arm paresis (ΝΙHSS score 9 points). (a) Her CT-perfusion mismatch map post-processed with RAPID software demonstrated a hypoperfused region of 11 mL in the Broca’s area (shown in green) and no area of reduced cerebral blood flow, resulting in a 11 mL mismatch difference (infinite mismatch ratio). (b,c) CT angiogram revealed no large vessel occlusion. The patient fulfilled all EXTEND eligibility criteria; IVT with alteplase started 5 h and 45 min after symptom onset with partial resolution of symptoms at the end of tPA infusion (NIHSS-score of 6 points). (d) Repeat MRI at 24 h demonstrated a small insular infarct and another acute infarct in the left temporoparietal region which was captured in the Tmax maps of initial perfusion imaging as Tmax > 4 s prolongation (c/arrow). The patient’s mRS-score at three months was 0.
Jcm 10 02819 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics in patients treated before and after the implementation of advanced neuroimaging.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics in patients treated before and after the implementation of advanced neuroimaging.
Baseline CharacteristicsAN−
(n = 29)		AN+
(n = 47)		p-Value
Age, years (mean, SD)63 ± 1673 ± 130.003
Weight, kg (mean, SD)82 ± 1880 ± 210.631
Smoking (%)27.6%25.5%0.850
Hypertension (%)72.4%57.4%0.189
Diabetes (%)31.0%17.0%0.154
Hypercholesterolemia (%)27.6%42.6%0.189
Prior stroke (%)3.4%4.3%0.861
Prior TIA (%)0.0%6.4%0.165
Congestive heart failure (%)3.0%0.0%0.200
Valvular disease (%)6.9%0.0%0.068
Coronary artery disease (%)10.3%4.3%0.298
Peripheral Arterial Disease (%)3.4%6.4%0.578
Extended window 4.5–9 h (%)0.0%14.9%0.029
Wake up stroke (%)3.4%8.5%0.387
Extended window or wake up3.4%23.4%0.020
NIHSS-score on admission, points (median, IQR)4 (2–7)5 (4–9)0.047
Systolic BP on admission, mmHg (mean ± SD)152 ± 34153 ± 210.837
Diastolic BP on admission, mmHg (mean ± SD)80 ± 1582 ± 140.549
Platelet count on admission, ×109/L (mean ± SD)267 ± 152228 ± 830.477
LDL on admission, mg/dL (mean ± SD)137.5 ± 49129.5 ± 340.554
Glucose on admission, mg/dL (mean ± SD)129 ± 39129 ± 390.174
Onset-to-imaging time, min (median, IQR)105 (87.5–161)160 (120–202.5)0.011
Door-to-needle time, min (median, IQR)43.5 (36–60)45 (30–61)0.956
Onset-to-treatment time (median, IQR)121 (110–153)197.5 (151–240)<0.001
ASPECTS (median, IQR) 10 (9–10)10 (9–10)0.278
Duration of Hospitalization (median, IQR)10 (8–18)9.5 (5–16.5)0.725
Location of stroke in the left hemisphere (%)43.2%56.8%0.564
Location of stroke in posterior circulation (%)34.5%19.1%0.199
Hyperdense vessel sign in CT (%)3.6%4.3%0.870
MR imaging (%)6.9%10.6%0.584
Thrombus length, mm (median, IQR)8.5 (5.75–14)12 (9–20)0.053
Large Vessel occlusion (%)17.2%19.1%0.835
Medium Vessel Occlusion (%)44.8%40.4%0.706
Blood pressure, BP; National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS; interquartile range, IQR; Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, ASPECTS; standard deviation, SD.
Table
Table 2. Neuroimaging characteristics of patients treated after the implementation of perfusion imaging.
Table 2. Neuroimaging characteristics of patients treated after the implementation of perfusion imaging.
Mean ischemic core volume (rCBF < 30%) (mean ± SD) (mL)2.1 ± 1.2
Mean volume of critical hypo perfusion (Tmax > 6 s) (mean ± SD) (mL)16.3 ± 4
Mean mismatch volume (mean ± SD) (mL)13.5 ± 3.3
Table
Table 3. Outcomes in patients treated before and after the implementation of AN.
Table 3. Outcomes in patients treated before and after the implementation of AN.
OutcomesAN−
(n = 29)		AN+
(n = 47)		p-Value
Any Hemorrhagic transformation (%)6.9%10.6%0.584
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (%)3.4%0.0%0.200
NIHSS-score 2 h, points (median, IQR)2 (0.5–3.5)3 (1–5.25)0.230
NIHSS 24 h, points (median, IQR)1 (0–4)1.5 (0–4)0.697
Discharge NIHSS (median, IQR)0 (0–2.5)0 (0–3)0.977
3-month mRS-score, points (median, IQR)2 (1–4)3 (1–5)0.614 ***
3-month Functional Independence (%) *82.1%89.1%0.394
3-month Favorable Functional Outcome (%) **75.0%78.3%0.746
3-month Mortality (%)0.0%4.3%0.263
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS. * mRS-scores of 0–2. ** mRS-scores of 0–1. *** Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test.
Table
Table 4. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses evaluating the association of the use of advanced neuroimaging in acute stroke chain pathway with outcomes.
Table 4. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses evaluating the association of the use of advanced neuroimaging in acute stroke chain pathway with outcomes.
OutcomesCrude OR (95% CI)p-ValueAdjusted * OR (95% CI)p-Value
Any ICH1.60 (0.29, 8.88)0.5861.30 (0.21, 8.01)0.840
Functional Independence at 3 months1.78 (0.47, 6.80)0.39812.89 (1.47, 113.00)0.021
Favorable Functional Outcome at 3 months1.20 (0.40, 3.63)0.7471.97 (0.54, 7.17)0.304
Odds ratio, OR; confidence intervals, CI. * Adjusted for the age and baseline NIHSS score.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Psychogios, K.; Safouris, A.; Kargiotis, O.; Magoufis, G.; Andrikopoulou, A.; Papageorgiou, E.; Chondrogianni, M.; Papadimitropoulos, G.; Polyzogopoulou, E.; Spiliopoulos, S.; et al. Advanced Neuroimaging Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Is Safe and Effective. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2819. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132819

AMA Style

Psychogios K, Safouris A, Kargiotis O, Magoufis G, Andrikopoulou A, Papageorgiou E, Chondrogianni M, Papadimitropoulos G, Polyzogopoulou E, Spiliopoulos S, et al. Advanced Neuroimaging Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Is Safe and Effective. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(13):2819. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Psychogios, Klearchos, Apostolos Safouris, Odysseas Kargiotis, Georgios Magoufis, Athina Andrikopoulou, Ermioni Papageorgiou, Maria Chondrogianni, Georgios Papadimitropoulos, Eftihia Polyzogopoulou, Stavros Spiliopoulos, and et al. 2021. "Advanced Neuroimaging Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Is Safe and Effective" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 13: 2819. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132819

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop