Next Article in Journal
Perineural Epinephrine for Brachial Plexus Block Increases the Incidence of Hypotension during Dexmedetomidine Infusion: A Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue “Pathogenesis, Epidemiology and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis”
Previous Article in Journal
Panoptic Segmentation on Panoramic Radiographs: Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Various Structures Including Maxillary Sinus and Mandibular Canal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Daily Fluctuation of Facial Pore Area, Roughness and Redness among Young Japanese Women; Beneficial Effects of Galactomyces Ferment Filtrate Containing Antioxidative Skin Care Formula
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

OX40L–OX40 Signaling in Atopic Dermatitis

1
Department of Dermatology, Kyushu University, Higashiku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
2
1-19-20 Momochi, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka 814-0006, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(12), 2578; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122578
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 26 May 2021 / Accepted: 10 June 2021 / Published: 11 June 2021

Abstract

:
OX40 is one of the co-stimulatory molecules expressed on T cells, and it is engaged by OX40L, primarily expressed on professional antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells. The OX40L–OX40 axis is involved in the sustained activation and expansion of effector T and effector memory T cells, but it is not active in naïve and resting memory T cells. Ligation of OX40 by OX40L accelerates both T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) effector cell differentiation. Recent therapeutic success in clinical trials highlights the importance of the OX40L–OX40 axis as a promising target for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

1. Introduction

T cells are pivotal players in adaptive immune responses, exhibiting a wide range of activities including cytokine/chemokine secretion, B cell regulation, macrophage response regulation, and cytotoxicity against infected or neoplastic cells. Full T cell activation requires three key signals: engagement of T cell receptors by antigen peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex, ligation of co-stimulatory molecules, and support from cytokines [1]. In addition, recent studies have stressed a cardinal role of co-inhibitory molecules in regulating excessive T cell activation [2,3,4,5]. There are several co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules, also known as immune checkpoint molecules (Figure 1).
The therapeutic success of blocking antibodies for co-inhibitory molecules, such as programmed cell death 1, programmed death ligand 1, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4, against melanoma and other cancers supports the multidirectional potential for targeting other immune checkpoint molecules in treating malignancies, autoimmune diseases, and allergic disorders [3,4,6,7,8]. However, only a few of molecules have been well characterized.
Immune checkpoint molecules are primarily classified into two groups: the immunoglobulin superfamily, and the tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF) and its receptors (TNFRSFs) [3,4,9] (Figure 1). OX40 (TNFRSF4, CD134) and its ligand OX40L (TNFSF4, CD252) are two such TNFSF/TNFRSF co-stimulatory immune checkpoint molecules [10,11]. In general, ligation of OX40 onto T cells by OX40L on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) facilitates the effector function of T cells [10,11]. OX40 expression can be induced in a variety of T cell subsets [10,11]. It is reported that the co-stimulatory molecules CD28 and CD40 regulate the early phases of T cell activation, whereas OX40 and CD30 are probably crucial for the late phases or long-lasting T cell responses [10,11]. Agonistic antibodies against OX40 induced favorable anti-tumor immune responses in preliminary clinical trials [9]. By contrast, antagonistic antibodies against OX40 produced favorable outcomes in the treatment of atopic dermatitis [12,13]. Therefore, the OX40–OX40L axis may be critical for promoting the type 2 immune deviation found in human atopic dermatitis [14,15].

2. OX40 Expression and Signaling in T Cells

OX40 is expressed primarily by activated T cells including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells; Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells; and Foxp3+CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) [10,11]. It is not expressed by naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, or most resting memory T cells. However, OX40 is rapidly expressed by these naïve and memory cells upon activation [16,17]. OX40 expression is induced and upregulated via the cross-linking of T cell receptors together with co-stimulation via CD28 (Figure 1). Its expression is enhanced and prolonged by IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, and TNF-α [10,11]. In various experimental autoimmune models, the OX40–OX40L axis enhances the effector function of CD4+ T cells, and its blockade ameliorates autoimmune inflammation [18]. Contrarily, the activation of OX40 by OX40L inhibits the expression of Foxp3 and the inhibitory function of Tregs [19,20,21]. OX40L is preferentially expressed in professional APCs, including dendritic cells, macrophages, and activated B cells [10,11]. Its expression is augmented by the activation of CD40 and Toll-like receptors [10,11]. Binding of OX40L results in the trimerization of OX40 monomers; recruitment of TRAF2, TRAF3, and TRAF5; and activation of NF-κB and NFAT pathways [10,11].

3. OX40–OX40L Axis in Type 1 and Type 2 Immune Responses

OX40 is expressed in activated effector T and effector memory T cells. Its stimulation promotes and sustains T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 activation rather than B cell responses [10,11,22,23] (Figure 2).
In a viral infection model, OX40 deficiency did not affect the production of virus-specific antibody production or virus-specific cytotoxic T cell response [22]. However, the proliferation of virus-specific Th cells and the production of interferon-γ (namely Th1 differentiation) are impaired in OX40-deficient mice [22]. Th1 differentiation was also attenuated in a systemic Listeria monocytogenes infection model of OX40-deficient mice. NK cell-derived interferon-γ upregulates OX40L expression in dendritic cells, and OX40L-expressing dendritic cells are critically involved in OX40+ Th1 cell expansion in this model [23]. Interestingly, OX40L-expressing group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s), but not dendritic cells, were required for full Th1 cell differentiation in an intestinal Salmonella infection model, suggesting that different APC population may be crucial for OX40L-dependent, site-specific inflammation [23].
Type 2 immune responses are pathogenic in allergic disorders such as atopic dermatitis and asthma [15,24,25]. In a murine asthma model using repeated ovalbumin administration, OX40 deficiency resulted in a significant reduction of airway hyperreactivity and Th2 responses such as IL-4 and IgE production [26]. Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 is a cardinal molecule for generating functional dendritic cells [27]. Respiratory syncytial virus infection also induces Th2-prone respiratory inflammation [28]. In this model, OX40L+ ILC2 and OX40+ Th cells are involved in Th2 cell expansion [28]. The administration of small interference mRNA targeting OX40L alleviates ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis by inhibiting the Th2-prone immune response [29]. Dendritic cells expressing CD301b are known to preferentially induce Th2-deviated immune responses [30]. Repeated urinary tract infection activates Th2-biased responses, which are mediated by CD301b+ OX40L+ dendritic cells [31].
Thus, the interaction of OX40L on APCs with OX40 on Th cells promotes and sustains both Th1 and Th2 cell expansion. Meanwhile, OX40 signaling likely inhibits IL-17A production and Th17 differentiation in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model [32]. Ligation of OX40 by recombinant OX40L upregulates the expression of interferon-γ and IL-4 in human T cells stimulated with phytohemagglutinin, whereas it downregulates the production of IL-17A [33]. However, conflicting results have been reported in models of uveitis and intestinal inflammation, in which OX40 signaling supports Th17 cell differentiation in vivo [34,35]. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the role of OX40L–OX40 signaling in Th17 differentiation.
OX40 shares signaling pathways with its fellow TNFRSF member CD30 (TNFRSF8) [36,37,38]. Therefore, the CD30L–CD30 axis is known to exert synergistic effects with the OX40L–OX40 axis in both Th1 and Th2 differentiation [23,37,39].

4. OX40L–OX40 Axis in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is characterized with Th2-biased immune responses, skin barrier dysfunction, and pruritus [15,24]. Th2-derived IL-13 and IL-4 decrease the expression of skin barrier-related proteins, such as filaggrin and loricrin, and cause barrier dysfunction [14]. In turn, barrier dysfunction accelerates Th2 immune deviation, which is attributable to pro-type 2 cytokines such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-25, and IL-33 produced from barrier-disrupted epidermis [40,41,42,43].
TSLP stimulates murine dendritic cells to express OX40L, and OX40L-positive dendritic cells induce OX40-positive T-cell differentiation [44,45,46,47]. OX40-positive T cells include a large number of Th2 cells expressing IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 [44,45,46,47]. Human dendritic cells treated with TSLP also tend to induce a Th2-cell population producing IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 [43]. Of note, TSLP-induced atopic inflammation is prevented by OX40L-specific blocking antibody [48].
IL-25 transgenic mice exhibit an increased number of blood eosinophils; elevated serum IgE levels; and IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 hyperproduction [49]. The intranasal administration of IL-25 induces pulmonary hypereosinophilia and enhances the expression of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and eotaxin [50]. IL-25 also stimulates dendritic cells to express OX40L, and results in Th2 differentiation [51].
IL-33 is a member of the IL-1 family that is produced by peripheral tissues and that induces type 2-dominant immune deviation [52]. It is overexpressed in keratinocytes derived from tape-stripped, barrier-disrupted epidermis [53]. IL-33 also stimulates ILC2s and dendritic cells to express OX40L, and upregulates Th2 differentiation [54,55]. IL-25 can also enhance OX40L expression in ILC2s, but its potency is lower than that of IL-33 [54]. Conversely, TSLP upregulates OX40L expression in dendritic cells but not in ILC2s [54].
The number of OX40L+ dendritic cells is higher in the lesional skin of patients with atopic dermatitis than in psoriatic and normal skin [40,56,57,58,59]. In the peripheral blood of patients with atopic dermatitis, OX40-expressing T cells are mostly compartmentalized in cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen-expressing CD45RO+ CD4+ T cells, namely skin-homing memory Th cells [60]. OX40+ dermal cells are also co-localized with OX40L+ cells, such as mast cells in the lesional skin of patients with atopic dermatitis [60]. These results stress that the OX40L–OX40 axis is probably an integral part of the pathogenic Th2 deviation crucial for atopic dermatitis.

5. Therapeutic Intervention Targeting the OX40L–OX40 Axis in Atopic Dermatitis

GBR 830 is an antagonizing anti-OX40 antibody. In a phase 2a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study (NCT02683928), GBR 830 was administered intravenously twice on days 1 and 29 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis [12]. GBR 830 was safe and tolerable in 46 patients. GBR 830 decreased the expression of OX40 and OX40L in the lesional skin in association with significant normalization of histological and transcriptomic abnormalities. The treatment reduced Th2, Th1, and Th17/Th22 signatures in the lesional skin. GBR 830 also significantly decreased clinical symptoms of atopic dermatitis compared to the effects of placebo [12].
KHK4083 is an antagonistic anti-OX40 antibody with antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity [61]. In a phase 1 trial of KHK4083 enrolling 22 patients with atopic dermatitis, injection of this antibody on day 1, day 15 and day 29 ablated OX40-expressing cells and significantly attenuated the symptoms of atopic dermatitis compared to the effects of placebo [61]. Continued improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index and Investigator’s Global Assessment scores were observed throughout the study until day 155 [61]. A phase 2 clinical study of an anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody (KHK4083) in subjects with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis was recently completed (NCT03703102, ClinialTrials.gov, accessed on 10 June 2021) [13]. In this study, 274 patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were enrolled. Although the final results are not published yet, this study also showed progressive improvement in efficacy by continuous KHK4083 administration beyond 16 w eeks and the potential for long-term sustained therapeutic effects after the completion of KHK4083 treatment [13]. These clinical studies further underpin the pathogenic implication of the OX40L–OX40 axis in atopic dermatitis.

6. Conclusions

The OX40L–OX40 axis is crucial for sustaining the effector function of T cells, especially Th1 and Th2 subpopulations. The expression of OX40 is confined to activated effector T and effector memory T cells. Therefore, therapeutic agents targeting OX40 do not affect naïve and resting memory T cells, which may explain the relatively safe properties of these agents. The recent clinical success of antagonistic or cytotoxic anti-OX40 antibodies in patients with atopic dermatitis underpins the potential efficacy of these agents for other allergic disorders.

Author Contributions

M.F. (Masutaka Furue) wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M.F. (Mihoko Furue) made Figures. Both of them revised the manuscript and approved its submission. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

M.F. (Masutaka Furue) is a consultant in clinical trials of KHK4083, Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.

References

  1. Smith-Garvin, J.E.; Koretzky, G.A.; Jordan, M.S. T Cell Activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 591–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, L.; Flies, D.B. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huang, C.; Zhu, H.X.; Yao, Y.; Bian, Z.H.; Zheng, Y.J.; Li, L.; Moutsopoulos, H.M.; Gershwin, M.E.; Lian, Z.X. Immune checkpoint molecules. Possible future therapeutic implications in autoimmune diseases. J. Autoimmun. 2019, 104, 102333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Choi, Y.; Shi, Y.; Haymaker, C.L.; Naing, A.; Ciliberto, G.; Hajjar, J. T-cell agonists in cancer immunotherapy. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e000966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nandi, D.; Pathak, S.; Verma, T.; Singh, M.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Thakur, S.; Raghavan, A.; Vijayamahantesh, G.A. T cell costimulation, checkpoint inhibitors and anti-tumor therapy. J. Biosci. 2020, 45, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eddy, K.; Chen, S. Overcoming Immune Evasion in Melanoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Willsmore, Z.N.; Coumbe, B.G.T.; Crescioli, S.; Reci, S.; Gupta, A.; Harris, R.J.; Chenoweth, A.; Chauhan, J.; Bax, H.J.; McCraw, A.; et al. Combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade: Treatment of melanoma and immune mechanisms of action. Eur. J. Immunol. 2021, 51, 544–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hallqvist, A.; Rohlin, A.; Raghavan, S. Immune checkpoint blockade and biomarkers of clinical response in non–small cell lung cancer. Scand. J. Immunol. 2020, 92, e12980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alves Costa Silva, C.; Facchinetti, F.; Routy, B.; Derosa, L. New pathways in immune stimulation: Targeting OX40. ESMO Open 2020, 5, e000573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Croft, M.; So, T.; Duan, W.; Soroosh, P. The significance of OX40 and OX40L to T-cell biology and immune disease. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 229, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Croft, M. Control of Immunity by the TNFR-Related Molecule OX40 (CD134). Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 28, 57–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Guttman-Yassky, E.; Pavel, A.B.; Zhou, L.; Estrada, Y.D.; Zhang, N.; Xu, H.; Peng, X.; Wen, H.-C.; Govas, P.; Gudi, G.; et al. GBR 830, an anti-OX40, improves skin gene signatures and clinical scores in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 144, 482–493.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Available online:. Available online: https://www.kyowakirin.com/media_center/news_releases/2021/pdf/e20210218_01.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2021).
  14. Furue, M. Regulation of skin barrier function via competition between AHR axis versus IL-13/IL-4‒JAK‒STAT6/STAT3 axis: Pathogenic and therapeutic implications in atopic dermatitis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nakahara, T.; Kido-Nakahara, M.; Tsuji, G.; Furue, M. Basics and recent advances in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. 2021, 48, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gramaglia, I.; Jember, A.; Pippig, S.D.; Weinberg, A.D.; Killeen, N.; Croft, M. The OX40 Costimulatory Receptor Determines the Development of CD4 Memory by Regulating Primary Clonal Expansion. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 3043–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bansal-Pakala, P.; Halteman, B.S.; Cheng, M.H.; Croft, M. Costimulation of CD8 T Cell Responses by OX40. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 4821–4825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Webb, G.J.; Hirschfield, G.M.; Lane, P.J. OX40, OX40L and Autoimmunity: A Comprehensive Review. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2016, 50, 312–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vu, M.D.; Xiao, X.; Gao, W.; Degauque, N.; Chen, M.; Kroemer, A.; Killeen, N.; Ishii, N.; Li, X.C. OX40 costimulation turns off Foxp3+ Tregs. Blood 2007, 110, 2501–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, X.; Xiao, X.; Lan, P.; Li, J.; Dou, Y.; Chen, W.; Ishii, N.; Chen, S.; Xia, B.; Chen, K.; et al. OX40 Costimulation Inhibits Foxp3 Expression and Treg Induction via BATF3-Dependent and Independent Mechanisms. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Jacquemin, C.; Augusto, J.F.; Scherlinger, M.; Gensous, N.; Forcade, E.; Douchet, I.; Levionnois, E.; Richez, C.; Lazaro, E.; Duffau, P.; et al. OX40L/OX40 axis impairs follicular and natural Treg function in human SLE. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e122167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kopf, M.; Ruedl, C.; Schmitz, N.; Gallimore, A.; Lefrang, K.; Ecabert, B.; Odermatt, B.; Bachmann, M.F. OX40-Deficient Mice Are Defective in Th Cell Proliferation but Are Competent in Generating B Cell and CTL Responses after Virus Infection. Immunity 1999, 11, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gajdasik, D.W.; Gaspal, F.; Halford, E.E.; Fiancette, R.; Dutton, E.E.; Willis, C.; Rückert, T.; Romagnani, C.; Gerard, A.; Bevington, S.L.; et al. Th1 responses in vivo require cell-specific provision of OX40L dictated by environmental cues. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Furue, M.; Ulzii, D.; Vu, Y.H.; Tsuji, G.; Kido-Nakahara, M.; Nakahara, T. Pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: Current paradigm. Iran. J. Immunol. 2019, 16, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Boguniewicz, M.; Beck, L.A.; Sher, L.; Guttman-Yassky, E.; Thaçi, D.; Blauvelt, A.; Worm, M.; Corren, J.; Soong, W.; Lio, P.; et al. Dupilumab Improves Asthma and Sinonasal Outcomes in Adults with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2021, 9, 1212–1223.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jember, A.G.; Zuberi, R.; Liu, F.T.; Croft, M. Development of Allergic Inflammation in a Murine Model of Asthma Is Dependent on the Costimulatory Receptor Ox40. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 193, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Park, S.C.; Shim, D.; Kim, H.; Bak, Y.; Choi, D.Y.; Yoon, J.H.; Kim, C.H.; Shin, S.J. Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-independent dendritic cells are major mediators of Th2 immune responses in allergen-induced asthmatic mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, J.; Cui, Y.; Zhu, W.; Bai, S.; Zhao, N.; Liu, B. Critical role of OX40/OX40L in ILC2-mediated activation of CD4+T cells during respiratory syncytial virus infection in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 76, 105784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liang, Z.P.; Xu, W.; Zhao, F.P.; Pan, H.Z.; Feng, H.J.; Xu, S.E.; Zhao, C.; Bao, Y.L.; Jiang, L.; Huang, Y.; et al. Effect of Blocking the OX40/OX40L Signaling Pathway by siRNA Interference on Animal Experimental Study of Allergic Rhinitis. Arch. Med. Res. 2019, 50, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kumamoto, Y.; Linehan, M.; Weinstein, J.S.; Laidlaw, B.J.; Craft, J.E.; Iwasaki, A. CD301b⁺ dermal dendritic cells drive T helper 2 cell-mediated immunity. Immunity 2013, 39, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wu, J.; Hayes, B.W.; Phoenix, C.; Macias, G.S.; Miao, Y.; Choi, H.W.; Hughes, F.M., Jr.; Todd Purves, J.; Lee Reinhardt, R.; Abraham, S.N. A highly polarized TH2 bladder response to infection promotes epithelial repair at the expense of preventing new infections. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiao, X.; Shi, X.; Fan, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Minze, L.; Liu, W.; Ghobrial, R.M.; Lan, P.; Li, X.C. The costimulatory receptor OX40 inhibits interleukin-17 expression through activation of repressive chromatin remodeling pathways. Immunity 2016, 44, 1271–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Li, J.; Li, L.; Shang, X.; Benson, J.; Merle Elloso, M.; Schantz, A.; Bracht, M.; Orlovsky, Y.; Sweet, R. Negative regulation of IL-17 production by OX40/OX40L interaction. Cell. Immunol. 2008, 253, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, Z.; Zhong, W.; Hinrichs, D.; Wu, X.; Weinberg, A.; Hall, M.; Spencer, D.; Wegmann, K.; Rosenbaum, J.T. Activation of OX40 Augments Th17 Cytokine Expression and Antigen-Specific Uveitis. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 2912–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xin, L.; Jiang, T.T.; Chaturvedi, V.; Kinder, J.M.; Ertelt, J.M.; Rowe, J.H.; Steinbrecher, K.A.; Way, S.S. Commensal microbes drive intestinal inflammation by IL-17-producing CD4+ T cells through ICOSL and OX40L costimulation in the absence of B7-1 and B7-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 10672–10677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Watts, T.H. TNF/TNFR family members in costimulation of T cell responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 23, 23–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gaspal, F.; Bekiaris, V.; Kim, M.Y.; Withers, D.R.; Bobat, S.; MacLennan, I.C.; Anderson, G.; Lane, P.J.; Cunningham, A.F. Critical synergy of CD30 and OX40 signals in CD4 T cell homeostasis and Th1 immunity to Salmonella. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 2824–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gaspal, F.; Withers, D.; Saini, M.; Bekiaris, V.; McConnell, F.M.; White, A.; Khan, M.; Yagita, H.; Walker, L.S.; Anderson, G.; et al. Abrogation of CD30 and OX40 signals prevents autoimmune disease in FoxP3-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 1579–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gracias, D.T.; Sethi, G.S.; Mehta, A.K.; Miki, H.; Gupta, R.K.; Yagita, H.; Croft, M. Combination blockade of OX40L and CD30L inhibits allergen-driven memory TH2 cell reactivity and lung inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 147, 2316–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Esaki, H.; Brunner, P.M.; Renert-Yuval, Y.; Czarnowicki, T.; Huynh, T.; Tran, G.; Lyon, S.; Rodriguez, G.; Immaneni, S.; Johnson, D.B.; et al. Early-onset pediatric atopic dermatitis is T(H)2 but also T(H)17 polarized in skin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 138, 1639–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Hammad, H.; Lambrecht, B.N. Barrier Epithelial Cells and the Control of Type 2 Immunity. Immunity 2015, 43, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Aktar, M.K.; Kido-Nakahara, M.; Furue, M.; Nakahara, T. Mutual upregulation of endothelin-1 and IL-25 in atopic dermatitis. Allergy 2015, 70, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Soumelis, V.; Reche, P.A.; Kanzler, H.; Yuan, W.; Edward, G.; Homey, B.; Gilliet, M.; Ho, S.; Antonenko, S.; Lauerma, A.; et al. Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Oyoshi, M.K.; Larson, R.P.; Ziegler, S.F.; Geha, R.S. Mechanical injury polarizes skin dendritic cells to elicit a T(H)2 response by inducing cutaneous thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Gilliet, M.; Soumelis, V.; Watanabe, N.; Hanabuchi, S.; Antonenko, S.; De Waal-Malefyt, R.; Liu, Y.J. Human Dendritic Cells Activated by TSLP and CD40L Induce Proallergic Cytotoxic T Cells. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1059–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ito, T.; Wang, Y.H.; Duramad, O.; Hori, T.; Delespesse, G.J.; Watanabe, N.; Qin, F.X.; Yao, Z.; Cao, W.; Liu, Y.J. TSLP-activated dendritic cells induce an inflammatory T helper type 2 cell response through OX40 ligand. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 1213–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Liu, Y.J.; Soumelis, V.; Watanabe, N.; Ito, T.; Wang, Y.-H.; de Waal Malefyt, R.; Omori, M.; Zhou, B.; Ziegler, S.F. TSLP: An Epithelial Cell Cytokine that Regulates T Cell Differentiation by Conditioning Dendritic Cell Maturation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 25, 193–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Seshasayee, D.; Lee, W.P.; Zhou, M.; Shu, J.; Suto, E.; Zhang, J.; Diehl, L.; Austin, C.D.; Meng, Y.G.; Tan, M.; et al. In vivo blockade of OX40 ligand inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin driven atopic inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 2007, 117, 3868–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Pan, G.; French, D.; Mao, W.; Maruoka, M.; Risser, P.; Lee, J.; Foster, J.; Aggarwal, S.; Nicholes, K.; Guillet, S.; et al. Forced expression of murine IL-17E induces growth retardation, jaundice, a Th2-biased response, and multiorgan inflammation in mice. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 6559–6567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Hurst, S.D.; Muchamuel, T.; Gorman, D.M.; Gilbert, J.M.; Clifford, T.; Kwan, S.; Menon, S.; Seymour, B.; Jackson, C.; Kung, T.T.; et al. New IL-17 family members promote Th1 or Th2 responses in the lung: In vivo function of the novel cytokine IL-25. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zheng, R.; Chen, F.H.; Gao, W.X.; Wang, D.; Yang, Q.T.; Wang, K.; Lai, Y.Y.; Deng, J.; Jiang, L.J.; Sun, Y.Q.; et al. The T(H)2-polarizing function of atopic interleukin 17 receptor B-positive dendritic cells up-regulated by lipopolysaccharide. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017, 118, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cayrol, C.; Duval, A.; Schmitt, P.; Roga, S.; Camus, M.; Stella, A.; Burlet-Schiltz, O.; Gonzalez-de-Peredo, A.; Girard, J.P. Environmental allergens induce allergic inflammation through proteolytic maturation of IL-33. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dickel, H.; Gambichler, T.; Kamphowe, J.; Altmeyer, P.; Skrygan, M. Standardized tape stripping prior to patch testing induces upregulation of Hsp90, Hsp70, IL-33, TNF-α and IL-8/CXCL8 mRNA: New insights into the involvement of ‘alarmins’. Contact Dermat. 2010, 63, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Halim, T.Y.F.; Rana, B.M.J.; Walker, J.A.; Kerscher, B.; Knolle, M.D.; Jolin, H.E.; Serrao, E.M.; Haim-Vilmovsky, L.; Teichmann, S.A.; Rodewald, H.R.; et al. Tissue-Restricted Adaptive Type 2 Immunity Is Orchestrated by Expression of the Costimulatory Molecule OX40L on Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells. Immunity 2018, 48, 1195–1207.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Nechama, M.; Kwon, J.; Wei, S.; Kyi, A.T.; Welner, R.S.; Ben-Dov, I.Z.; Arredouani, M.S.; Asara, J.M.; Chen, C.H.; Tsai, C.Y.; et al. The IL-33-PIN1-IRAK-M axis is critical for type 2 immunity in IL-33-induced allergic airway inflammation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Suárez-Fariñas, M.; Dhingra, N.; Gittler, J.; Shemer, A.; Cardinale, I.; de Guzman Strong, C.; Krueger, J.G.; Guttman-Yassky, E. Intrinsic atopic dermatitis shows similar TH2 and higher TH17 immune activation compared with extrinsic atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Noda, S.; Suárez-Fariñas, M.; Ungar, B.; Kim, S.J.; de Guzman Strong, C.; Xu, H.; Peng, X.; Estrada, Y.D.; Nakajima, S.; Honda, T.; et al. The Asian atopic dermatitis phenotype combines features of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis with increased TH17 polarization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 1254–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ilves, T.; Harvima, I.T. OX40 ligand and OX40 are increased in atopic dermatitis lesions but do not correlate with clinical severity. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2013, 27, e197–e205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fujita, H.; Shemer, A.; Suárez-Fariñas, M.; Johnson-Huang, L.M.; Tintle, S.; Cardinale, I.; Fuentes-Duculan, J.; Novitskaya, I.; Carucci, J.A.; Krueger, J.G.; et al. Lesional dendritic cells in patients with chronic atopic dermatitis and psoriasis exhibit parallel ability to activate T-cell subsets. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 574–582.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Elsner, J.S.; Carlsson, M.; Stougaard, J.K.; Nygaard, U.; Buchner, M.; Fölster-Holst, R.; Hvid, M.; Vestergaard, C.; Deleuran, M.; Deleuran, B. The OX40 Axis is Associated with Both Systemic and Local Involvement in Atopic Dermatitis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2020, 100, adv00099–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Nakagawa, H.; Iizuka, H.; Nemoto, O.; Shimabe, M.; Furukawa, Y.; Kikuta, N.; Ootaki, K. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of repeated intravenous infusions of KHK4083, a fully human anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2020, 99, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Representative immune checkpoint molecules. T cells express a variety of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules which are activated by specific molecules on antigen-presenting cells. These co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules are recently called immune checkpoint molecules.
Figure 1. Representative immune checkpoint molecules. T cells express a variety of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules which are activated by specific molecules on antigen-presenting cells. These co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules are recently called immune checkpoint molecules.
Jcm 10 02578 g001
Figure 2. OX40L–OX40 axis induces the expansion of effector Th1 and Th2 cells.Naïve T cells are activated with the help of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD80/CD86 and CD28 ligation. Subsequently, the expansion of effector Th1 and Th2 cells is augmented and sustained by OX40L and OX40 ligation. Resting memory T cells do not express OX40. Upon reactivation, memory T cells become effector memory T cells and express OX40. Ligation of OX40 with OX40L again induces the expansion of effector memory Th1 and Th2 cell expansion. Th1, T helper 1; Th2, T helper 2; APC, antigen-presenting cells.
Figure 2. OX40L–OX40 axis induces the expansion of effector Th1 and Th2 cells.Naïve T cells are activated with the help of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD80/CD86 and CD28 ligation. Subsequently, the expansion of effector Th1 and Th2 cells is augmented and sustained by OX40L and OX40 ligation. Resting memory T cells do not express OX40. Upon reactivation, memory T cells become effector memory T cells and express OX40. Ligation of OX40 with OX40L again induces the expansion of effector memory Th1 and Th2 cell expansion. Th1, T helper 1; Th2, T helper 2; APC, antigen-presenting cells.
Jcm 10 02578 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Furue, M.; Furue, M. OX40L–OX40 Signaling in Atopic Dermatitis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122578

AMA Style

Furue M, Furue M. OX40L–OX40 Signaling in Atopic Dermatitis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(12):2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122578

Chicago/Turabian Style

Furue, Masutaka, and Mihoko Furue. 2021. "OX40L–OX40 Signaling in Atopic Dermatitis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 12: 2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122578

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop