Next Article in Journal
Membrane ATPases and Mitochondrial Proteins in Fetal Cerebellum After Exposure to L-Glutamate During Gestation
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Composite Membrane by Constructing Helical Carbon Nanotubes in Ceramic Support Channels for Efficient Emulsion Separation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coenzyme Q10 Enhances Resilience of Mitochondrial-like Membranes Against Amyloidogenic Peptides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fast-Rising Electric Pulses by Reducing Membrane Tension for Efficient Membrane Electroporation

School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2025, 15(5), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15050151
Submission received: 5 March 2025 / Revised: 22 April 2025 / Accepted: 8 May 2025 / Published: 16 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Composition and Biophysical Properties of Lipid Membranes)

Abstract

:
Membrane electroporation is an emerging minimally invasive ablation technique being rapidly applied in the ablation treatment of tumors and heart conditions. Different rise times of electric fields lead to variations in the distribution and duration of electric field strength on the cell membrane. This study investigated the effect of the electric field’s rise time on membrane electroporation characteristics using molecular dynamics simulations. The results showed that fast-rising electrical pulses can significantly reduce the membrane tension induced by the Coulomb force within a short period of time and lead to a trend of the electric field angle distribution towards smaller values below 45°, thereby effectively promoting the pore formation process. Optimizing the electric field’s rise time is an effective electroporation ablation strategy, potentially improving the efficacy of clinical cancer treatment.

1. Introduction

Electroporation, as a non-thermal ablation modality, has demonstrated significant advantages in tumor treatment and cardiac ablation in recent years. It induces the formation of transient nanopores in the cell membrane by applying a high-intensity electric field, leading to the irreversible electroporation and subsequent apoptosis of target cells while avoiding the side effects of thermal injury to surrounding tissues [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Molecular dynamic (MD) simulations have provided a novel perspective for the study of membrane electroporation, serving as an important complement to existing experimental methods. The molecular mechanisms of the cell membrane under the action of electric pulses, including the formation of water pores in lipid bilayers, have been elucidated [8]. Although preclinical studies have confirmed the effectiveness of this technology, optimizing electric field parameters to achieve efficient electroporation and enhance pulse ablation efficiency remains a central challenge in current research.
In practical electroporation ablation experiments, pulsed electric fields are typically employed to interact with the cell membrane. Studies have shown that different pulse parameters (including millisecond, microsecond, and nanosecond pulses) significantly regulate the dynamic process of cell death. Among them, the optimization of pulse duration and pulse type can directly affect the activation degree of immune response, thereby contributing to the improvement of therapeutic effects [9,10]. Different rise times of the electric field can lead to changes in the distribution of the electric field on the cell membrane and the duration of its action, thereby affecting the outcomes of membrane electroporation. However, traditional electroporation research has primarily focused on optimizing basic parameters such as electric field strength and pulse duration, while the correlation mechanisms between the dynamic characteristics of the electric field (such as rise time and waveform changes) and membrane electroporation efficiency remain underexplored. Recently, studies have indicated that the temporal characteristics of the electric field waveform may significantly influence electroporation efficiency by modulating the accumulation process of the transmembrane potential [11]. Other studies have elucidated the complex behavior of pore formation in giant unilamellar vesicles under different loading rates in aspiration experiments and predicted that the behavior of planar phospholipid membranes under the action of an electric field is similar to that under lateral tension [12,13]. Specifically, relevant studies have demonstrated that the prolongation of a pulse’s raised time can lead to an increase in the critical voltage value required for the formation of the first membrane pore, thereby affecting the efficiency of the electroporation process [14]. It is worth noting that the rapid changes in the electric field during the rise and fall of the pulse amplitude were the cause of intracellular effects [15]. Single pulses with short rise and fall times can induce electric field-dependent increases in calcium ion influx, the dissipation of mitochondrial membrane potential, and cell death [16]. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing the rise and fall times of the electric field for improving electroporation efficiency and controlling intracellular effects.
This study analyzed the effects of different electric field rise times on the cell membrane using molecular dynamics simulations. The results showed that reducing the electric field’s rise time significantly decreased the membrane tension caused by the Coulomb force, which, in turn, facilitated the reorientation of phospholipid molecules and, thus, promoted pore formation. Specifically, rapidly rising electrical pulses can cause the electric field angle distribution to more readily favor values below 45° within a shorter period of time, thereby more effectively promoting pore formation. In clinical tumor ablation therapy, optimizing the electric field’s rise time can serve as an effective electroporation strategy.

2. Materials and Methods

The phospholipid membrane, composed of 1024 1,2-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) molecules, was constructed by the CHARMM-GUI membrane constructor [17,18]. DPPC, a representative phospholipid in mammalian cell membranes, has been widely used in studies of membrane pore dynamics [19,20,21]. The phospholipid membrane was immersed in a solution composed of 244 sodium ions, 244 chloride ions, and approximately 21,000 water molecules, with a 0.15 M NaCl concentration, which closely mimics the ion composition of extracellular fluid in physiological conditions. Figure 1 depicts the simulated system at a box size of approximately 17.3 nm × 17.3 nm × 12.5 nm. All systems were simulated using the GROMACS 2023.5 simulation package [22] at coarse-grained (CG) resolution using the Martini 2.2 force field [23,24,25]. The Martini force field employs a “four-to-one” coarse-graining strategy, mapping an average of four heavy atoms and their bonded hydrogen atoms to a single coarse-grained bead. Each DPPC molecule is composed of 12 Martini particles: the hydrophobic tail chains of sn-1 and sn-2 are each represented by four hydrophobic beads (C1B–C4B and C1A–C4A, respectively); the polar head includes a negatively charged phosphate group (PO4) and a positively charged choline group (NC3); the glycerol backbone is constructed by two neutral beads (GL1 and GL2), with GL1 bridging the phosphate group and the sn-2 chain, and GL2 linking GL1 to the sn-1 chain. A periodic boundary was applied in three directions [20]. The leap-frog algorithm was utilized in this MD simulation to integrate the equations of motion. The temperature was maintained at 310 K using the Berendsen algorithm [26], and a pressure of 1 bar was coupled semi-isotropically using the Parrinello–Rahman algorithm [27]. Short-range electrostatic and Lennard–Jones interactions were cut off at 1.2 nm, and long-range electrostatics were calculated by the PME algorithm [28]. All simulations utilized a 20 fs MD timestep [29], with the coordinates saved every 0.1 ns. Once the equilibrium configuration was reached (after 100 ns), MD simulations were performed, with production run times of 10 ns at 0.16 V/nm and 50 ns at 0.18 V/nm and 0.20 V/nm.
In this study, the electric field applied to the simulated system was divided into two stages: the rising phase and the constant phase (Table S1). During the rising phase, the electric field that increased linearly with time along the Z-axis was applied, with the field strength gradually increasing from zero to the preset peak value. In our study, the rise times of the electric field were set at 1 ns, 5 ns, 10 ns, 15 ns, 20 ns, and 30 ns. Once the electric field reached the predetermined peak value, it entered the constant phase, during which a constant electric field equal to the peak value was applied until pore formation was observed. Under the same peak electric field conditions, the maximum electric field strength corresponding to different rise times was consistent and equal to the peak electric field strength. For each electric field configuration, the simulation was repeated five times.
The peak electric field strengths selected for this study were 0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.2 V/nm, which are an order of magnitude higher than the typical electric field strength of nanosecond pulsed electric fields in experimental studies [30,31]. In current molecular simulations of membrane electroporation, the applied electric field strength is generally higher than experimental standards, regardless of whether coarse-grained methods or all-atom force fields are used [11,32,33,34]. Additionally, under the condition of a peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm, following the constant electric field phase, we conducted simulations with falling edge durations of 1 ns, 5 ns, and 10 ns to investigate whether pore recovery occurred.
To quantitatively analyze the orientation characteristics of the phospholipid membrane under different electric field rise times, this study employed an angle analysis method based on spatial distribution. The simulation box was divided into 1 nm × 1 nm subregions along the X and Y axes. The angle between the phospholipid membrane’s normal and the Z-axis was calculated within each subregion and the proportion of subregions with angles less than 45° was statistically analyzed. This proportion reflects the spatial orientation characteristics of the phospholipid membrane, which was used to assess its tilting degree relative to the direction of the electric field. All molecular images were generated using the visualization software VMD 1.9.4a57 [35]. Pore formation was identified by the formation of a continuous water chain spanning the hydrophobic core of the phospholipid membrane [36]. The analysis of the simulation trajectories was completed using the built-in analysis tools in the GROMACS 2023.5 software package. The membrane surface tension was computed from the pressure tensor obtained via the “gmx energy” command, following Equation (1) [37].
γ = 1 2 L z P z z 1 2 ( P x x P y y )
Here, L z is the dimension of the simulation box in the Z-axis, with L z = 12.5 nm in this study; P z z is the pressure component perpendicular to the membrane surface (in the Z-axis direction); and P x x and P y y are the pressure components parallel to the membrane surface (in the X and Y axes).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fast-Rising Electric Pulses Promote Membrane Electroporation Effects

In practical electroporation applications, electric pulses are typically used instead of constant electric fields. To make the simulation experiments more realistic, this study systematically investigated the effects of electric pulses with different rising-edge characteristics on phospholipid membrane electroporation by adjusting the electric field’s rise time.
We applied a linearly rising electric field along the Z-axis, increasing from zero to the preset peak value. Once the peak value was reached, the electric field strength was maintained until pore formation occurred. In this study, the pore sizes formed during the application of the constant electric field had already approached the boundary of the simulation box. Consequently, under the peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm, no pore recovery was observed in the simulations with falling edges of 1 ns, 5 ns, and 10 ns conducted after the constant electric field phase. However, pore recovery might be observed is the falling edge is increased for smaller pores. As shown in Figure 2, the pore formation time was significantly affected by the electric field’s rise time, with a shorter rise time leading to a shorter pore formation time. Pore time refers to the total time from the beginning of the simulation to the formation of the pore, including the duration of the electric field’s rise phase. As the electric field’s rise time decreased from 30 ns to 1 ns, the pore formation times for electric pulses with peak field strengths of 0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.20 V/nm were shortened by 2.01, 3.28, and 5.81 times, respectively. This result is consistent with previous studies [38], which have shown that a rapid increase in transmembrane voltage can more easily induce pore formation. It should be noted that, with a 30 ns rise time, the pore formation time under a 0.2 V/nm electric field (31.2 ns) was 0.4 ns longer than that under a 0.18 V/nm electric field (30.8 ns), which may be attributed to the resonance effect between water molecules and the electric field [11]. Additionally, due to the small electric field strength interval in this study, the influence of adjacent high electric field strengths on the pore formation time becomes less significant [39]. The rapid change in the electric field accelerated the polarization process of the membrane, leading to an exponential increase in membrane capacitance, which, in turn, destabilized the membrane structure and facilitated pore formation. When the peak electric field increased from 0.16 V/mm to 0.20 V/mm, the pore formation time also showed a significant downward trend. As described in a previous study, the electric field strength is nonlinearly and positively correlated with the pore formation rate [39]. Additionally, we analyzed the pore formation time starting from the peak electric field (Table S2). Compared with simulations of longer electric field rise times, simulations of shorter electric field rise times presented longer pore formation times calculated after the electric field peak. Additionally, under lower peak electric field conditions (e.g., 0.16 V/nm), the difference in pore formation times after the peak between fast and slow electric field rise times was smaller than that under higher peak electric field conditions. Considering the membrane deformation during the rapid change in the electric field, the rise time of the electric field should be taken into account when calculating the pore formation time. Specifically, compared with the application of a constant low-intensity electric field [40], electric pulses with a rapid rising edge can more effectively induce pore formation within a shorter period of time. This phenomenon indicates that the rising edge of the electric pulse plays a significant role in enhancing the electroporation effect, thus verifying the potential of fast-rising electric pulses in improving electroporation efficiency.
As shown in Figure 3, we used the VMD top-down view to display the pore structures formed under electric pulses with varying rise times at a peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm. The results show that only one pore forms per cycle in the simulation box under this electric field. As the rise time decreases from 10 ns to 1 ns, the pore formation rate accelerates, and the pore size increases. Notably, when comparing 15 ns, 20 ns, and 30 ns pulses, shorter rise times significantly reduce the time required to form a specific pore size.

3.2. The Reverse Effect of Anisotropic Coulomb Forces Induced by Changing Electric Fields on Membranes

The anisotropic Coulomb force induced by the electric field plays a significant role in the electroporation process. When the electric field is applied in the Z-axis, analyzing the forces on the membrane in the XY direction helps to reveal how the electric field’s rise time can affect local membrane deformation and pore formation. To more accurately predict the effects of the electric field’s rise time on membrane electroporation characteristics, we analyzed the Coulomb force on the phospholipid membrane along the XYZ dimensions of the simulation box under different electric field rise times. The Coulomb force in the XY plane was obtained by calculating the vector sum of the forces in the X and Y axes. As shown in Figure 4, the changing electric field rise times exhibited significant anisotropic regulation of the spatial distribution of the Coulomb force experienced by the phospholipid membrane. The electric field’s rise time increased, and the Coulomb force experienced by the membrane in the XY plane showed a clear upward trend (Figure 4a), while the force in the Z dimension exhibited a counteracting weakening effect (Figure 4b). This inverse effect of the anisotropic Coulomb force can alleviate the perturbation of the membrane, thereby further stabilizing the membrane structure and ultimately inhibiting the electroporation process [40]. When the peak electric field was 0.16 V/nm, the electric field force experienced by the phospholipid membrane in the XY plane, which was perpendicular to the membrane normal vector, increased by 8.35 × 103 kJ/mol/nm as the electric field’s rise time increased from 1 ns to 30 ns. Meanwhile, the Coulomb force in the Z-axis, which is parallel to the membrane vector’s normal, decreased by approximately 62%. Notably, as the phospholipid membrane lay in the XY plane, the Coulomb interactions in the XY plane were influenced by both the electric field and internal membrane interactions, resulting in a cumulative effect. By contrast, the Coulomb interactions within the membrane in the Z direction were negligible. Thus, the Coulomb forces in the XY plane were much larger than those in the Z direction. Although the force variation in the XY direction was only about 3%, the change in pore formation time was approximately threefold. This result indicates that even small changes can significantly affect the behavior of the phospholipid membrane, similar to how minor variations in membrane properties can lead to substantial changes in lipid conformation and orientation [41]. Similar results were also observed at peak electric fields of 0.18 V/nm and 0.20 V/nm (Figures S1 and S2). This phenomenon indicates that a rapid change in the electric field can significantly weaken the interactions between phospholipid molecules within a short period of time, making the membrane structure more susceptible to perturbation and, thus, facilitating pore formation. These findings provide a new perspective for understanding the mechanism of interaction between the electric field and the membrane and offer a theoretical basis for optimizing electroporation techniques.

3.3. Dynamic Electric Field Regulation of Membrane Tension Related to the Electric Field Angle

Under the influence of the dynamic electric field, the structure of the phospholipid membrane undergoes a certain degree of dynamic fluctuation. To further investigate the mechanism by which the electric field’s rise time affects the anisotropic characteristics of the forces on the phospholipid membrane and to verify whether this anisotropy originates from the inhomogeneity of the electric field direction acting on the phospholipid membrane, in particular, we employed the method based on our previous research on the electric field direction [40]. Specifically, we calculated the angle between the phospholipid membrane’s normal and the Z-axis of the simulation box to analyze the orientation distribution characteristics of the angles in different regions of the phospholipid membrane. It should be noted that the phospholipid membrane’s normal is perpendicular to the phospholipid membrane plane, and in this study, the phospholipid membrane’s normal direction corresponds to the Z-axis of the simulation box. In this process, we quantified the tilt angle of the phospholipid membrane relative to the electric field direction by calculating the proportion of regions with angles less than 45°, thereby evaluating its promoting effect on pore formation. This approach allowed for a clearer revelation of the mechanisms by which different electric field rise times affect the electroporation effect on the membrane. To calculate the proportion of regions with angles less than 45°, the phospholipid membrane was evenly divided into 1 nm × 1 nm unit areas along the X and Y axes. With the center of each unit area as the reference, the membrane normal perpendicular to the area was determined, and the electric field angle was defined as the angle between the normal and the Z-axis. The proportion of regions with angles less than 45° was analyzed by tallying the electric field angles of all unit areas. Figure 5 illustrates the tilting of the phospholipid membrane and the Coulomb force in the XY plane under different electric field angles. As the electric field angle increased, the membrane tilting intensified, and the Coulomb force in the XY plane also increased. With a larger angle, the lateral force perpendicular to the membrane’s normal was strengthened, which hindered pore formation.
The variation in the proportion of regions where the angle between the normal of the phospholipid membrane and the Z-axis of the simulation box is less than 45°, where the electric field’s rise time under different peak electric field strengths is shown in Figure 6a. Under the influence of electric fields with different rise times, the phospholipid membrane fluctuated in response, causing the membrane’s normal in different regions to align at varying angles with the electric field direction. When the electric field’s rise time increased from 1 ns to 30 ns, the proportion of regions where the angle between the normal of the phospholipid membrane and the Z-axis of the simulation box was less than 45° and decreased by 12.8% under the peak electric field strength of 0.16 V/nm. Under peak electric field strengths of 0.18 V/nm and 0.20 V/nm, the proportion decreased by 20.5% and 16.5%, respectively. These results indicate that compared with long-rise-time electric fields, short-rise-time electric fields are more inclined to form a smaller angle distribution of the electric field, thereby creating more favorable conditions for pore formation. This is closely related to the reduction in membrane surface tension under low-angle electric fields [40]. As the electric field angle decreases, the membrane surface tension is reduced, making pore formation more readily achievable.
To investigate how the electric field’s rise time affects the characteristics of membrane electroporation, particularly whether it modulates membrane surface tension by altering the angle distribution of the electric field acting on the phospholipid membrane, we analyzed changes in membrane surface tension under electric pulses with different rise times. The electric field angle analysis used the instantaneous configuration at the end of the electric field’s rise phase as the reference point, directly measuring the distribution of the phospholipid membrane’s normal in relation to the simulation box. The results showed that as the electric field’s time to rise decreased, the membrane tension exhibited a significant downward trend (Figure 6b). This further confirmed that the adjustment of the electric field’s rise time was effective in changing the electric field angle distribution by affecting membrane tension, thereby regulating the characteristics of membrane electroporation. Under the influence of a rapid electric field rise, the phospholipid headgroups, with their short rotational time constant (0.1–0.5 ns) [42], can quickly respond to the electric field changes and adjust their orientation to facilitate pore formation. Even with a low external electric field strength, nanosecond electric field pulses can significantly enhance membrane perturbation efficiency. Therefore, we recommend optimizing electroporation characteristics in experimental design by adjusting the rise time of the electric field pulse rather than simply increasing the field strength. However, due to the relatively small differences among the three selected peak electric field strengths (0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.20 V/nm), the changes in phospholipid membrane orientation and membrane tension did not yet show a clear trend with variations in the peak electric field strength. In short, under the action of a fast-rising electric pulse, the degree of membrane deformation was relatively small, and the proportion of regions where the angle between the membrane’s normal and the electric field direction was less than 45° increased. This distribution of electric field angles made the electric field direction nearly perpendicular to the membrane surface during the constant phase, thereby increasing the Coulomb force of the membrane in the Z-axis and decreasing it in the XY plane. This indicates that the smaller membrane deformation induced by rapidly rising electrical pulses resulted in lower membrane surface tension, thereby accelerating pore formation and enlarging pore size. Conversely, the significant membrane deformation caused by slow-rising electrical pulses increased membrane surface tension, requiring more energy to overcome the barrier for pore formation and, thus, necessitating the longer duration of electric field exposure. This finding revealed the significant role of the electric field’s rise time in regulating membrane tension and pore formation, providing an important theoretical basis for optimizing electroporation techniques.

4. Conclusions

This study, through molecular dynamics simulations, reveals the significant impact that the electric field’s rise time has on membrane electroporation characteristics, offering new insights into the molecular mechanisms of electroporation. The findings indicate that adjusting the electric field’s rise time can significantly alter membrane tension, thereby regulating the orientation of phospholipid molecules and the kinetics of pore formation. Specifically, the rapidly rising electric pulse drove the electric field direction to be more perpendicular to the membrane surface, significantly reducing electric field angle-dependent membrane surface tension over an extremely short time, thereby effectively promoting pore formation. In clinical tumor and cardiac ablation therapy, optimizing the rise in the electric field’s time can serve as an effective electroporation strategy and lay a theoretical foundation for optimizing electroporation techniques and developing personalized treatment plans in clinical applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/membranes15050151/s1. Table S1: The electric field schemes for the rise phase and the plateau phase; Table S2: The average time of pore formation measured from the onset of the peak electric field; Figure S1: The Coulomb force acted on the phospholipid membrane via an electric field with various electric field rise times (peak electric field: 0.18 V/nm); Figure S2: The Coulomb force acted on the phospholipid membrane via an electric field with various electric field rise times (peak electric field: 0.20 V/nm).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.Z.; Data curation, L.H.; Formal analysis, L.H. and K.Z.; Funding acquisition, P.Y.; Investigation, P.Y. and L.H.; Methodology, K.Z.; Project administration, P.Y. and K.Z.; Resources, P.Y.; Supervision, P.Y.; Validation, L.H. and K.Z.; Visualization, L.H.; Writing—original draft, L.H.; Writing—review and editing, P.Y. and K.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 2024 Corps Science and Technology Programme (Key R&D Achievement Transformation Innovation Environment Construction and Capacity Enhancement Project), grant number 2024AB065, and The APC was funded by the Shanghai Co-innovation Center for energy therapy of tumors of China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Molecular Dynamics Simulation Server provided by the Huifeng Biotechnology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guo, S.; Jing, Y.; Burcus, N.I.; Lassiter, B.P.; Tanaz, R.; Heller, R.; Beebe, S.J. Nano-pulse stimulation induces potent immune responses, eradicating local breast cancer while reducing distant metastases. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ringel-Scaia, V.M.; Beitel-White, N.; Lorenzo, M.F.; Brock, R.M.; Huie, K.E.; Coutermarsh-Ott, S.; Eden, K.; McDaniel, D.K.; Verbridge, S.S.; Rossmeisl, J.H., Jr.; et al. High-frequency irreversible electroporation is an effective tumor ablation strategy that induces immunologic cell death and promotes systemic anti-tumor immunity. EBioMedicine 2019, 44, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rossi, A.; Pakhomova, O.N.; Mollica, P.A.; Casciola, M.; Mangalanathan, U.; Pakhomov, A.G.; Muratori, C. Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields Induce Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Accompanied by Immunogenic Cell Death in Murine Models of Lymphoma and Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Poompavai, S.; Sree, V.G.; Priyaa, A.K. Electrothermal Analysis of the Breast-Tumor Model During Electroporation. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 2020, 4, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reddy, V.Y.; Dukkipati, S.R.; Neuzil, P.; Anic, A.; Petru, J.; Funasako, M.; Cochet, H.; Minami, K.; Breskovic, T.; Sikiric, I.; et al. Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2021, 7, 614–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gudvangen, E.; Kim, V.; Novickij, V.; Battista, F.; Pakhomov, A.G. Electroporation and cell killing by milli- to nanosecond pulses and avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in cancer ablation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miklavčič, D.; Verma, A.; Krahn, P.R.P.; Štublar, J.; Kos, B.; Escartin, T.; Lombergar, P.; Coulombe, N.; Terricabras, M.; Jarm, T.; et al. Biophysics and electrophysiology of pulsed field ablation in normal and infarcted porcine cardiac ventricular tissue. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 32063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kotnik, T.; Rems, L.; Tarek, M.; Miklavčič, D. Membrane Electroporation and Electropermeabilization: Mechanisms and Models. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2019, 48, 63–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peng, W.; Polajžer, T.; Yao, C.; Miklavčič, D. Dynamics of Cell Death Due to Electroporation Using Different Pulse Parameters as Revealed by Different Viability Assays. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2024, 52, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Polajžer, T.; Miklavčič, D. Immunogenic Cell Death in Electroporation-Based Therapies Depends on Pulse Waveform Characteristics. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, J.; Yin, H.; Ma, J.; Bo, W.; Yang, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Gong, Y. Terahertz Electric Field-Induced Membrane Electroporation by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Membr. Biol. 2018, 251, 681–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Akimov, S.A.; Volynsky, P.E.; Galimzyanov, T.R.; Kuzmin, P.I.; Pavlov, K.V.; Batishchev, O.V. Pore formation in lipid membrane II: Energy landscape under external stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Akimov, S.A.; Volynsky, P.E.; Galimzyanov, T.R.; Kuzmin, P.I.; Pavlov, K.V.; Batishchev, O.V. Pore formation in lipid membrane I: Continuous reversible trajectory from intact bilayer through hydrophobic defect to transversal pore. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vasilkoski, Z.; Esser, A.T.; Gowrishankar, T.R.; Weaver, J.C. Membrane electroporation: The absolute rate equation and nanosecond time scale pore creation. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2006, 74, 021904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schoenbach, K.H.; Beebe, S.J.; Buescher, E.S. Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses. Bioelectromagnetics 2001, 22, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Beebe, S.J.; Chen, Y.J.; Sain, N.M.; Schoenbach, K.H.; Xiao, S. Transient features in nanosecond pulsed electric fields differentially modulate mitochondria and viability. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jo, S.; Kim, T.; Iyer, V.G.; Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 1859–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, E.L.; Cheng, X.; Jo, S.; Rui, H.; Song, K.C.; Dávila-Contreras, E.M.; Qi, Y.; Lee, J.; Monje-Galvan, V.; Venable, R.M.; et al. CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2014, 35, 1997–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, L.; Chen, J.; Zhou, G.; Wang, Y.; Xu, C.; Wang, X. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Permeation of Bisphenol A and Pore Formation in a Lipid Membrane. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mou, Q.; Xu, M.; Deng, J.; Hu, N.; Yang, J. Studying the roles of salt ions in the pore initiation and closure stages in the biomembrane electroporation. APL Bioeng. 2023, 7, 026103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kasparyan, G.; Hub, J.S. Molecular simulations reveal the free energy landscape and transition state of membrane electroporation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 148401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abraham, M.J.; Murtola, T.; Schulz, R.; Páll, S.; Smith, J.C.; Hess, B.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 2015, 1–2, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Marrink, S.J.; De Vries, A.H.; Mark, A.E. Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marrink, S.J.; Risselada, H.J.; Yefimov, S.; Tieleman, D.P.; De Vries, A.H. The MARTINI force field: Coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 7812–7824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wassenaar, T.A.; Ingólfsson, H.I.; Bockmann, R.A.; Tieleman, D.P.; Marrink, S.J. Computational lipidomics with insane: A versatile tool for generating custom membranes for molecular simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 2144–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Berendsen, H.J.C. Transport Properties Computed by Linear Response through Weak Coupling to a Bath. In Computer Simulation in Materials Science: Interatomic Potentials, Simulation Techniques and Applications; Meyer, M., Pontikis, V., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 139–155. [Google Scholar]
  27. Parrinello, M.; Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 1981, 52, 7182–7190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N log (N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stix, R.; Tan, X.F.; Bae, C.; Fernández-Mariño, A.I.; Swartz, K.J.; Faraldo-Gómez, J.D. Eukaryotic Kv channel Shaker inactivates through selectivity filter dilation rather than collapse. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadj5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, S.; Jackson, D.L.; Burcus, N.I.; Chen, Y.-J.; Xiao, S.; Heller, R. Gene electrotransfer enhanced by nanosecond pulsed electric fields. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2014, 1, 14043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Beebe, S.J.; Fox, P.M.; Rec, L.J.; Willis, E.L.; Schoenbach, K.H. Nanosecond, high-intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells. Faseb J. 2003, 17, 1493–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marracino, P.; Caramazza, L.; Montagna, M.; Ghahri, R.; D’Abramo, M.; Liberti, M.; Apollonio, F. Electric-driven membrane poration: A rationale for water role in the kinetics of pore formation. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 143, 107987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lee, D.; Naikar, J.S.; Chan, S.S.Y.; Meivita, M.P.; Li, L.; Tan, Y.S.; Bajalovic, N.; Loke, D.K. Ultralong recovery time in nanosecond electroporation systems enabled by orientational-disordering processes. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 7934–7942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cui, Y.; Niu, Y.; Zhao, T.; Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y. Microscopic mechanistic study of the penetration distributions for plasma reactive oxygen and nitrogen species based on sialic acid targeting on the cell membrane surface. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2024, 225, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33–38, 27-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ho, M.C.; Levine, Z.A.; Vernier, P.T. Nanoscale, electric field-driven water bridges in vacuum gaps and lipid bilayers. J. Membr. Biol. 2013, 246, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, F.; Smith, P.E. Theory and computer simulation of solute effects on the surface tension of liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 8975–8984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maček Lebar, A.; Miklavčič, D.; Kotulska, M.; Kramar, P. Water Pores in Planar Lipid Bilayers at Fast and Slow Rise of Transmembrane Voltage. Membranes 2021, 11, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, J.; Ma, J.; Guo, L.; Wang, K.; Yang, Y.; Bo, W.; Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, H.; Wu, Z.; et al. Interpretation of the molecular mechanism of the electroporation induced by symmetrical bipolar picosecond pulse trains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2020, 1862, 183213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ye, P.; Huang, L.; Zhao, K. Bidirectional Modulation on Electroporation Induced by Membrane Tension Under the Electric Field. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 50458–50465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reddy, A.S.; Warshaviak, D.T.; Chachisvilis, M. Effect of membrane tension on the physical properties of DOPC lipid bilayer membrane. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2012, 1818, 2271–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Antila, H.S.; Wurl, A.; Ollila, O.H.S.; Miettinen, M.S.; Ferreira, T.M. Rotational decoupling between the hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions in lipid membranes. Biophys. J. 2022, 121, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Side view of the phospholipid membrane system. Dark blue, yellow, and grey particles represent the DPPC phospholipid membrane, and the light blue, red, and green particles represent polar water molecules, sodium ions, and chloride ions, respectively. The external electric field applied along the Z-axis.
Figure 1. Side view of the phospholipid membrane system. Dark blue, yellow, and grey particles represent the DPPC phospholipid membrane, and the light blue, red, and green particles represent polar water molecules, sodium ions, and chloride ions, respectively. The external electric field applied along the Z-axis.
Membranes 15 00151 g001
Figure 2. The influence of the electric field’s rise time on the pore formation time. The red, blue, and black bars represent the peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.20 V/nm, respectively. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the five repeated simulations.
Figure 2. The influence of the electric field’s rise time on the pore formation time. The red, blue, and black bars represent the peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.20 V/nm, respectively. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the five repeated simulations.
Membranes 15 00151 g002
Figure 3. Snapshots of pore formation in the phospholipid membrane with varying electric field rise times (peak electric field: 0.16 V/nm). Here, t represents the pore formation time, including the electric field’s rise time.
Figure 3. Snapshots of pore formation in the phospholipid membrane with varying electric field rise times (peak electric field: 0.16 V/nm). Here, t represents the pore formation time, including the electric field’s rise time.
Membranes 15 00151 g003
Figure 4. The Coulomb force acted on the phospholipid membrane via an electric field with various electric field rise times (peak electric field: 0.16 V/nm). (a) The Coulomb force acting on the phospholipid membrane in the XY plane under different electric field rise times. This Coulomb force was calculated by the vector summation of the X and Y axes. (b) The Coulomb force acting on the phospholipid membrane in the Z direction under different electric field rise times. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the data within a 1 ns time window (excluding the electric field rise time phase) centered around the pore formation moment.
Figure 4. The Coulomb force acted on the phospholipid membrane via an electric field with various electric field rise times (peak electric field: 0.16 V/nm). (a) The Coulomb force acting on the phospholipid membrane in the XY plane under different electric field rise times. This Coulomb force was calculated by the vector summation of the X and Y axes. (b) The Coulomb force acting on the phospholipid membrane in the Z direction under different electric field rise times. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the data within a 1 ns time window (excluding the electric field rise time phase) centered around the pore formation moment.
Membranes 15 00151 g004
Figure 5. Illustrations of the phospholipid membrane tilting and Coulomb forces in the XY plane under different electric field angles. The electric field angles represent the angles between the electric field direction and the membrane’s normal at 0°, 45°, and 60°. Dashed lines are used as references for the electric field angles. Yellow dashed lines represent the phospholipid membrane plane and the phospholipid membrane’s normal, which are perpendicular to each other; the black dashed line indicates the Z-axis of the simulation box; the blue arrow shows the applied electric field direction, parallel to the Z-axis of the simulation box; and the red arrow indicates the Coulomb force on the membrane in the XY plane, perpendicular to the membrane normal, with the arrow length representing the force magnitude.
Figure 5. Illustrations of the phospholipid membrane tilting and Coulomb forces in the XY plane under different electric field angles. The electric field angles represent the angles between the electric field direction and the membrane’s normal at 0°, 45°, and 60°. Dashed lines are used as references for the electric field angles. Yellow dashed lines represent the phospholipid membrane plane and the phospholipid membrane’s normal, which are perpendicular to each other; the black dashed line indicates the Z-axis of the simulation box; the blue arrow shows the applied electric field direction, parallel to the Z-axis of the simulation box; and the red arrow indicates the Coulomb force on the membrane in the XY plane, perpendicular to the membrane normal, with the arrow length representing the force magnitude.
Membranes 15 00151 g005
Figure 6. The effects of the electric field’s rise time on phospholipid membrane structure and surface tension. (a) Analysis of phospholipid membrane orientation. The simulation box was divided into 1 nm × 1 nm subregions along the X and Y axes. The angle between the membrane’s normal and the Z-axis was calculated in each subregion and the percentage of subregions with angles < 45° was determined. The blue, black, purple, and black bars represent the peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.20 V/nm, respectively. (b) The surface tension of the phospholipid membrane induced by the electric field at various rise times. The blue, black, purple, and black lines represent the peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.20 V/nm, respectively.
Figure 6. The effects of the electric field’s rise time on phospholipid membrane structure and surface tension. (a) Analysis of phospholipid membrane orientation. The simulation box was divided into 1 nm × 1 nm subregions along the X and Y axes. The angle between the membrane’s normal and the Z-axis was calculated in each subregion and the percentage of subregions with angles < 45° was determined. The blue, black, purple, and black bars represent the peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.20 V/nm, respectively. (b) The surface tension of the phospholipid membrane induced by the electric field at various rise times. The blue, black, purple, and black lines represent the peak electric field of 0.16 V/nm, 0.18 V/nm, and 0.20 V/nm, respectively.
Membranes 15 00151 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ye, P.; Huang, L.; Zhao, K. Fast-Rising Electric Pulses by Reducing Membrane Tension for Efficient Membrane Electroporation. Membranes 2025, 15, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15050151

AMA Style

Ye P, Huang L, Zhao K. Fast-Rising Electric Pulses by Reducing Membrane Tension for Efficient Membrane Electroporation. Membranes. 2025; 15(5):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15050151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ye, Ping, Lulu Huang, and Kuiwen Zhao. 2025. "Fast-Rising Electric Pulses by Reducing Membrane Tension for Efficient Membrane Electroporation" Membranes 15, no. 5: 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15050151

APA Style

Ye, P., Huang, L., & Zhao, K. (2025). Fast-Rising Electric Pulses by Reducing Membrane Tension for Efficient Membrane Electroporation. Membranes, 15(5), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15050151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop