Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Performance of Thin-Film Nanofiltration Membranes with Embedded Montmorillonites
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of an Integrated Ultrafiltration/Solid Phase Extraction Process for Purification of Oligomeric Grape Seed Procyanidins
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Implanting TiO2-NPs on PVC for Long-Term UF Membrane Performance to Treat Refinery Wastewater
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Function of Adsorption, Photo-Oxidation, and Humic Acid Using Air Backwashing in Integrated Water Treatment of Multichannel Ceramic MF and PP Particles
Open AccessArticle

Optimization of Air Backwash Frequency during the Ultrafiltration of Seawater

Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, M2P2-EPM (UMR 7340), 13545 Aix en Provence, France
Plateforme Expérimentale Mollusques Marins, Station Ifremer de Bouin, Polder des Champs, 85230 Bouin, France
Suez—Aquasource, 20, Avenue Didier Daurat, CEDEX 04, 31029 Toulouse, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2020, 10(4), 78;
Received: 26 February 2020 / Revised: 13 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 22 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Membrane Systems and Processes)
The main objective of this paper is to study the effect of new air backwash on dead-end ultrafiltration of seawater with a pilot at semi-industrial scale (20 m3/day). To control membrane fouling, two different backwashes were used to clean the membrane: classical backwash (CB) and new air backwash (AB) that consists of injecting air into the membrane module before a classical backwash. To evaluate the efficiency of AB and CB, a resistance in series model was used to calculate each resistance: membrane (Rm), reversible (Rrev) and irreversible (Rirr). The variation of the seawater quality was considered by integrating the turbidity variation versus time. The results indicate clearly that AB was more performant than CB and frequency of AB/CB cycles was important to control membrane fouling. In this study, frequencies of 1/5 and 1/3 appear more efficient than 1/7 and 1/9. In addition, the operation conditions (flux and time of filtration) had an important role in maintaining membrane performance—whatever the variation of the seawater quality. View Full-Text
Keywords: ultrafiltration; seawater treatment; air backwash; fouling control ultrafiltration; seawater treatment; air backwash; fouling control
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Cordier, C.; Eljaddi, T.; Ibouroihim, N.; Stavrakakis, C.; Sauvade, P.; Coelho, F.; Moulin, P. Optimization of Air Backwash Frequency during the Ultrafiltration of Seawater. Membranes 2020, 10, 78.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop