Next Article in Journal
Humoral Immunogenicity of mRNA Booster Vaccination after Heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or Homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Preliminary Report
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination Promptness after Eligibility in a North Carolina Longitudinal Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections after Third Doses Boost IgG Specific Salivary and Blood Antibodies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficacy and Short-Term Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study on Vaccinated People in the UAE
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Associated with Vaccination Uptake among Young Children: A Follow-Up Study of 1799 Toddlers

1
Centre for Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
2
Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
3
School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
4
The School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
5
The School of Public Health, The Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and The Peking Union Medical Colleges, Beijing 100006, China
6
The School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2023, 11(3), 535; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030535
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 24 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccination Intention against the COVID-19 Pandemic)

Abstract

:
Childhood vaccination is crucial to protect young children from harmful infectious diseases. This study aimed to investigate the recent childhood immunization rate of recommended and additional vaccinations and identify the factors affecting the vaccination uptake of young children in Hong Kong. The self-administrated questionnaires were distributed to parents of toddlers aged 2 to 5. They were asked to provide information on (1) socioeconomic demographic factors; (2) experiences during pregnancy; and (3) the medical history of the toddler. A total of 1799 responses were collected. Children were more likely to be fully vaccinated when they were at a younger age (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48–0.78, p < 0.001), the first child in the family (aOR second-born = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48–0.81, p < 0.001; aOR third-born = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19–0.55, p < 0.001), had a higher household income (aOR HKD 15,000–HKD 29,999 = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.27–2.55, p = 0.001; aOR ≥ HKD 30,000 = 3.42, 95% CI: 2.39–4.90, p < 0.001; compared with <HKD 15,000), or with mothers in older age groups (aOR 35–39 years old = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.22–4.93, p = 0.012; aOR ≥ 40 = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.24–6.77, p = 0.014; compared with ≤ age 24). The uptake of any additional vaccination was 71%. Children who were older (aOR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02–1.70, p = 0.036), the first child in the family (aOR second-born = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56–0.99, p = 0.043; aOR third-born = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32–0.96, p = 0.034), with higher household income (aOR ≥ HKD 30,000 = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.10–2.37, p = 0.016), were exposed to second-hand smoke from the father (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08–2.07, p = 0.016), experienced hospitalization (twice or more—aOR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04–1.99, p = 0.027), or were fully vaccinated (aOR: 2.76, 95% CI: 2.12–3.60, p < 0.001) were associated with a higher chance of taking an additional vaccine. To encourage the vaccination rate, more attention should be given to families with more children, low-income families, and younger mothers.

1. Introduction

Childhood vaccination is crucial to protect young children from harmful infectious diseases. It is estimated that vaccination prevents 3.5–5 million lives lost annually due to vaccine-preventable diseases, including diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, influenza, and measles [1]. For children, it significantly lowered the infant mortality rate from 6.5% in 1990 to 2.9% in 2018 across the globe [2].
In Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Childhood Immunisation Programme (HKCIP) was introduced in the 1960s [3]. It provides free-of-charge immunization from infants to primary school children, and the vaccination service is provided by the Maternal and Child Health Centres and the outreach school immunization team of the Department of Health [4]. Parents are recommended vaccines for their children at the appropriate time, but they can choose not to vaccinate or partially vaccinate their children according to the schedule, leading to varying vaccination rates. Although vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective in reducing child mortality [2,5], some parents choose not to vaccinate their children. Previous research has found that lower vaccination uptake was significantly related to a higher birth order [6], mothers at a younger age [7], and a lower level of parental trust in vaccination [8]. Additionally, the education level of the parents and socioeconomic level were found to have both positive and negative effects on the childhood vaccination rate in different studies [6,9].
However, some studies focused on parental factors, such as their knowledge and attitude, as well as the family features, but did not consider the socioeconomic demographic factors of children [6,8]. To our knowledge, limited research has been conducted on childhood vaccination in the context of Hong Kong [10,11]. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the recent childhood immunization rate of recommended and additional vaccinations and identify the factors affecting the vaccination uptake of young children in Hong Kong.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subject Recruitment

A total of 1799 children aged 2–5 were recruited from randomly selected local nurseries and kindergartens in each district cluster. Cluster sampling was adopted in which each kindergarten or nursery was considered a cluster. We extracted a full list of kindergartens and nurseries in Hong Kong from the Education Bureau of the Hong Kong SAR Government. The kindergartens and nurseries were then stratified into 18 districts in Hong Kong. Random numbers were generated and schools were selected according to the random numbers. The principals of the selected clusters were contacted for approval of the study participation. All parents with their children studying in the selected schools were invited to participate, and written consent from the parents was obtained. The majority of the subjects were recruited from September 2015 to July 2016, whereas the overall timeframe was from January 2015 to July 2016.

2.2. Survey Instruments

The survey was pilot-tested among 149 parents from 4 kindergartens and validated by an expert panel consisting of healthcare professionals, epidemiologists, and physicians. The survey included 17 questions. The caregivers of the toddlers were asked to provide information by self-report on (1) socioeconomic demographic factors: sex of toddlers, age of toddlers and their parents, birth order of the toddlers, monthly household income, and educational background of parents; (2) experiences during pregnancy: maternal alcohol drinking, smoking history of parents, complications/health problems during pregnancy, delivery method, and gestational age at delivery; and (3) medical history of toddlers: previous experience of hospitalization since birth and vaccination record (recommended and additional vaccines). The full questionnaire can be found in Supplementary Material File S1.

2.3. Definition of Variables

In this study, the first outcome of full vaccination referred to the uptake of all vaccinations recommended in the Hong Kong Childhood Immunisation Programme (HKCIP) by the Department of Health in Hong Kong. The vaccines recommended include (1) Bacille Calmette–Guerin (BCG) vaccine, (2) hepatitis B vaccine (three doses), (3) diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-IPV) vaccine (three doses and booster), (4) pneumococcal vaccine (two doses and booster), (5) varicella vaccine, and (6) measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. The second outcome of additional vaccination referred to the uptake of any of the following vaccines: (1) Rotavirus vaccine, (2) influenza vaccine, (3) varicella vaccine (booster), (4) Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, (5) combined vaccine, (6) hepatitis A (HepA) vaccine, (7) meningococcal vaccine, or (8) Japanese encephalitis vaccine.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 26.0. First, a descriptive analysis of the study participants was conducted. The distribution of participants by various characteristics was illustrated. Furthermore, the uptake rate of various vaccines was presented. For the second part, multiple logistic regression models were set up to examine the association between the explanatory factors and the two outcome variables, namely, (1) fully vaccinated under the recommendation by the Department of Health and (2) having taken any additional vaccines, after adjusting for confounding. The enter method in which all variables were entered at one single time was used. All p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The ages of the toddlers and their parents appear normally distributed from quantile–quantile (Q-Q) plots and histograms. Although they were found to be statistically significantly deviated from the normal distribution by the Shapiro–Wilk test, it is believed to be caused by the large sample size of the study [12].

3. Results

3.1. Respondents’ Characteristics

A total of 1799 responses were collected from parents of toddlers of ages 2 to 5 (mean age: 3.42, SD: 0.50; Table 1). Among the toddlers, 53.0% (n = 953) and 47.0% (n = 846) were boys and girls, respectively. A total of 58.3% (n = 962) of toddlers were delivered vaginally and not induced, followed by delivery through Caesarean section (n = 552, 33.5%), and vaginally and induced (n = 135, 8.2%). More than half of the toddlers (n = 972, 59.0%) were delivered during weeks 37–39 of pregnancy, while 35.8% (n = 590) and 5.2% (n = 85) were delivered during weeks 40 or longer and weeks 36 or less, respectively. A total of 65.3% (n = 1079) of the toddlers were the first-born in the family, while around 30% (n = 476, 28.8%) were the second-born.
As far as the sociodemographic status of the family is concerned, the majority of the toddlers came from families with a monthly household income of at least HKD 30,000 (n = 809, 52.5%). Most of the mothers and fathers were 25–34 years old (mothers: n = 1025, 63.1%, mean: 32.79, SD: 4.61; fathers: n = 716, 44.9%, mean: 36.11, SD: 6.30), and had completed post-secondary education (mothers: n = 804, 49.2%; fathers: n = 809, 50.2%).
During pregnancy, 3.0% (n = 48) and 2.3% (n = 38) of the mothers had a drinking or smoking history, while 24.1% (n = 391) of the fathers had smoked. Approximately one-fourth of the mothers (n = 411, 24.9%) reported complications/health problems during pregnancy. Since their birth, about 20% of the toddlers (n = 377, 21.4%) were hospitalized twice or more.

3.2. Prevalence of the Uptake of Vaccination

A total of 59.0% (n = 1061) of the toddlers were fully vaccinated based on the recommendation by the Hong Kong Childhood Immunisation Programme (HKCIP). The measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine had the highest uptake rate (n = 1770, 98.4%), followed by the hepatitis B vaccine (all three doses) (n = 1756, 97.4%), the Bacille Calmette–Guerin (BCG) vaccine (n = 1756, 97.4%), the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-IPV) vaccine (three doses plus booster) (n = 1706, 94.6%), and the pneumococcal vaccine (two doses plus booster) (n = 1683, 93.3%). Meanwhile, only 66.4% of the toddlers were vaccinated for varicella (n = 1198). Conversely, 1.2% (n = 21), 1.3% (n = 23), and 4.3% (n = 78) had not received any doses of the hepatitis B vaccine, DTap-IPV vaccine, and pneumococcal vaccine, respectively. The vaccination rates of each dose of the vaccine can be found in Figure 1.
A total of 71.0% (n = 1279) of the toddlers had taken at least one additional vaccine. The most prevalent additional vaccine was the rotavirus vaccine (n = 723, 40.1%, Figure 2), followed by the influenza vaccine (n = 628, 34.9%), the varicella vaccine (booster) (n = 279, 15.5%), the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine (n = 225, 12.5%), the combined vaccine (n = 117, 6.5%), the hepatitis A (HepA) vaccine (n = 107, 5.9%), the meningococcal vaccine (n = 69, 3.8%), and the Japanese encephalitis vaccine (n = 23, 1.3%).

3.3. Factors Associated with Uptake of Vaccination

Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified several factors significantly associated with the likelihood of full vaccination, as recommended. The age of the toddler was negatively associated with the odds of getting fully vaccinated (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48–0.78, p < 0.001), i.e., the odds of getting fully vaccinated dropped by 39% per year of age. There was a negative linear relationship between the order of birth and full vaccination. Compared with first-born children, second-born (aOR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48–0.81, p < 0.001) and third-born (aOR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19–0.55, p < 0.001) children were significantly less likely to have full vaccination. Meanwhile, weeks of pregnancy (37–39 weeks: aOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.14–1.87, p = 0.003; compared with 40 weeks or more), monthly household income (HKD 15,000-HKD 29,999: aOR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.27–2.55, p = 0.001; HKD 30,000 or above: aOR = 3.42, 95% CI: 2.39–4.90, p < 0.001; compared with below HKD 15,000), and the age of mother (35–39 years old: aOR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.22–4.93, p = 0.012; 40 or above: aOR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.24–6.77, p = 0.014; compared with age 24 or below) were associated with a higher likelihood of full vaccination. The prevalence of full vaccination among toddlers with various characteristics and the aORs can be found in Table 2.
The age of the toddler was positively associated with a higher chance of getting additional vaccinations (aOR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02–1.70, p = 0.036). Similarly, a negative linear relationship between the birth order and additional vaccination was found: second-born (aOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56–0.99, p = 0.043) and third-born (aOR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32–0.96, p = 0.034) children were significantly less likely to have additional vaccinations compared with first-born children. In contrast, monthly household income (HKD 30,000 or above: aOR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.10–2.37, p = 0.016, compared with below HKD 15,000), father’s smoking during pregnancy (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08–2.07, p = 0.016), the experience of hospitalization since birth (twice or more—aOR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04–1.99, p = 0.027), and fully vaccinated based on recommendation (aOR: 2.76, 95% CI: 2.12–3.60, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of getting additional vaccinations. More detailed results of factors associated with the odds of getting additional vaccinations can be found in Table 3.

4. Discussion

4.1. Summary of Major Findings

This study assesses various factors that affect the recommended vaccination rate and additional vaccination rate among young children in Hong Kong. The overall uptake rate of all recommended vaccinations was 59%. Over 97% of children had received the Bacille Calmette–Guerin (BCG) vaccine (97.4%) and three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine (97.4%). The average uptake of all other recommended vaccinations was over 90%. However, only 66.4% of children had received the varicella vaccine. Children were more likely to be fully vaccinated when they were at a younger age, the first child in the family, had a higher household income (above HKD 15,000), and had mothers in older age groups.
The uptake of any additional vaccination was 71%. Children who were older, the first child in the family, with higher household income (above HKD 29,999), exposed to second-hand smoke from their father, experienced hospitalization since birth, and were fully vaccinated were associated with a higher chance of receiving an additional vaccine.

4.2. Explanations and Comparisons with Previous Literature

The childhood vaccination rate in Hong Kong is relatively high on the global level. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the global vaccination coverage with three doses of hepatitis B was estimated at 80%; three doses of Pneumococcal vaccination, 51%; and the first dose of measles, 81% [13]. However, it is noted that the coverage rate of the varicella vaccine was significantly lower (66.4%). As suggested by the WHO, at least 80% of varicella vaccination coverage was defined as an adequate level. In Hong Kong, the varicella vaccine was incorporated into the HKCIP in 2014, and children born on or after January 1, 2013, are eligible to receive the varicella vaccine for free [14]. Some of the children included in the current study were born before 2013, and parents need to pay for the varicella vaccine, which might have lowered the incentive to receive the vaccine for this group of people. Additionally, another reason could be parental worry about the varicella vaccine. A previous study found that parents were concerned that taking the varicella vaccine would increase the risk of herpes zoster rather than prevention [15]. As indicated by another study, major reasons for parents not vaccinating their children against varicella were the belief that the infection is not severe enough to warrant vaccination (33.7%), concern about the side effects of vaccination (31.0%), and the thought that the vaccine was ineffective (19.7%) [16].
Concerning additional vaccinations, all vaccines are provided by private clinics only and self-paid, except the booster of the varicella vaccine that has been included in the HKCIP since 2014. The immunization rate of additional vaccinations was generally lower than the global level. For example, the global coverage for the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine was estimated at 71%, and the rotavirus vaccine was 49% [13], compared with 12.5% for Hib and 40.1% for rotavirus in Hong Kong. As Hong Kong is not a high-risk area for communicable diseases, such as meningococcal infection and Japanese encephalitis [17], the government recommends the general public receive the vaccine before traveling to endemic areas [18,19]. Besides vaccination, there are effective and simple preventive measures against diseases, such as maintaining good personal hygiene and keeping the environment clean [19,20,21].
Our study found that the age of the children and mother, as well as the family household income, had an impact on childhood vaccination uptake. Due to the newly introduced measure of varicella vaccine in the free, comprehensive Childhood Immunization Programme, children born after 2012 can enjoy a free varicella vaccine under HKCIP. No catch-up vaccination is provided by the government at the current stage. Therefore, it is understandable that younger children were more likely to be fully vaccinated. Conversely, our findings illustrated that older children were more likely to receive additional vaccinations. Studies found a tendency of delayed vaccination due to a child’s illness [22] and safety concerns [23]. Parents postpone the vaccination schedule until their children are in a better health condition and grow mentally stronger; this may delay a parental decision to receive additional vaccines.
Previous studies have presented mixed results on income level and vaccine acceptance. The current study identified that families with higher household incomes (above HKD 15,000) were more likely to get their children fully vaccinated. An American study found that parents with higher household income were more likely to conform with the recommended vaccination schedule (household income: HKD 100,000–HKD 150,000, OR: 0.17, CI: 0.03–0.82, p = 0.030, compared with household income <HKD 50,000) [24]. Despite this, several studies found negative [9] and unclear associations [25,26] between family income and vaccine uptake.
Our findings indicate that younger mothers had a higher vaccine hesitancy. Similar to a prior study, parents at a younger age were associated with a greater level of vaccine hesitancy (b = −0.24, SE = 0.09, p = 0.006). However, we only identified the mother’s age as the significant factor but not the father’s age. Mothers are the major caregiver of children in Hong Kong; the vaccination decision is primarily made by the mother. The characteristics of mothers may have a direct effect on vaccinating their children. Another study assessed that mothers aged ≤24 years (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50–0.87) and between 25 and 34 years (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63–0.99) were less likely to fully vaccinate their children [27]. One potential explanation might be that younger mothers use the internet to acquire parenting information [28]; they are more likely to be exposed to misinformation about vaccine safety [29]. They may choose not to receive or only receive some vaccines for their children.
Birth order was well recognized as a key factor affecting childhood vaccination in past studies [6,30,31,32]. A Brazilian study showed that a third- or later-born child was 1.5 times more likely to be not fully vaccinated than the first-born child (aOR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3–1.8) [33]. Similar findings were also presented in a Philippines study that having three or more children in a family was significantly associated with incomplete vaccination (OR: 0.6, p < 0.05) [31]. Parental investment of time and resources may be decreased with more children [34]. Parents may fail to take later-born children to receive vaccines timely; they may also be less likely to pay for additional vaccines due to resource constraints. In addition, we discovered that children born between 37–39 weeks have an increased chance of being fully vaccinated, but we did not find a significant relationship for premature children (born before 37 weeks). From the previous findings, the immunization coverage was lower among premature children [35], and they are more likely to delay vaccination [36,37,38]. Further studies could be conducted to compare the vaccine uptake of term, preterm, and extremely preterm infants.
Moreover, health-related factors were identified as the major determinants for additional vaccinations, including the experience of hospitalization since birth and the father’s smoking behavior during pregnancy. Exposure to second-hand smoke during pregnancy brings adverse health effects to infants, such as preterm delivery (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.99) [39], lower birth weight (OR: −53.7 g, 95% CI: −98.4 to −8.9 g) [40], increased risk of asthma, and poor lung function [41,42]. It is suspected that caregivers recognized the adverse effect of second-hand smoking exposure and attempted to offset the effect by providing additional vaccinations for their children. A study showed that children who had fewer inpatient days (β = 0.22, CI: 0.09–0.53, p = 0.02), outpatient visits (β = 0.88, CI: 0.79–0.98, p = 0.047), and emergency room visits (β = 0.80, CI: 0.64–0.997, p = 0.0006) were more likely to have a refusal of vaccination [9]. The study indicated that healthier children are less likely to receive additional vaccinations, whilst children with poorer health status may receive greater parental health investment, as proved by a previous paper [34]. Without a doubt, fully vaccinated children had a higher chance of receiving additional vaccinations, which implies that parents who had a generally positive attitude towards vaccination were more likely to get additional vaccinations for their children. Previous studies have also supported that parental attitude toward vaccination was important for children to be vaccinated [8]. The vaccine uptake rate was lower if parents were in doubt about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine [43,44]. Therefore, it is suggested that the government should provide ample information on vaccines to the general public. It is also recommended that vaccination centers be set up in more convenient locations with later service hours to address the difficulty of making time for getting children vaccinated after the long working hours of the parents [45].

4.3. Strengths and Limitations

In our study, a thorough summary of the variables associated with childhood immunization of recommended vaccinations and additional vaccinations was provided. An expert panel composed of general practitioners as well as epidemiologists and healthcare specialists validated and pilot-tested the survey. Despite this, there are several limitations to this study. First, the generalization of our study to a larger population should be performed with caution, as the number of responses received from each cluster varied. Second, a cluster effect may exist in our study because subjects from the same nurseries and kindergartens may share some similar characteristics. Additionally, we only examined the correlation between the variables and outcomes, but the underlying cause and effect were not evaluated. We identified that the updated vaccination guideline of HKCIP in 2014 could be one of the possible confounding factors, and other possible confounders need further exploration. Finally, the vaccination record of the toddlers was self-reported by their parents; there might be memory errors or even social-desirability bias. For example, it could be possible that parents falsely report the record, even though toddlers had not received the vaccination, to be viewed favorably. Furthermore, as the current study focuses only on Hong Kong, it may lack external validity, and generalizing results to populations of other countries should be performed with caution.

5. Conclusions

The present study concluded that smaller birth order, higher household income, and older age of mothers were associated with full vaccination of their children. Children were more likely to receive additional vaccinations when they are older, the first-born child, have a higher household income, are exposed to second-hand smoke from their father, and were hospitalized. Additionally, children who received all recommended vaccinations were related to a higher chance of taking an additional vaccine. To encourage the vaccination rate, more attention should be given to families with more children, low-income families, and younger age of mothers. The parental attitude and knowledge towards vaccination seem to play an important role in the uptake rate of vaccination, and the government should work on promoting childhood vaccination and dispelling the myth of vaccination. Further studies, including qualitative interviews, can be conducted to explore the barriers and concerns of the parents, while a follow-up study should be conducted to explore the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns. Subsequent vaccination rates should be monitored to capture any changes in parents’ perceptions and decisions on vaccination in the post-COVID-19 era.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines11030535/s1, Supplementary material File S1: Questionnaire.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H. and M.C.S.W.; formal analysis, S.C.C.; resources, C.K.M.C., V.M.W.K. and A.S.C.L.; data curation, S.C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C.C. and W.S.P.; writing—review and editing, J.H., C.K.M.C., V.M.W.K., A.S.C.L., Q.H.Y.L., L.W.H.M., A.L. and M.C.S.W.; supervision, M.C.S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by Wyeth Nutrition HK (ref: WNHK-14-01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CREC), the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), and the New Territories East Cluster (NTEC) (CREC-2013-632).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Date used were part of a follow up in SING cohort study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Vaccines and Immunization. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/vaccines-and-immunization#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  2. Nandi, A.; Shet, A. Why vaccines matter: Understanding the broader health, economic, and child development benefits of routine vaccination. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 1900–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. LCQ13: Childhood Immunisation Programme. Press Releases. Available online: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200802/20/P200802200145.htm (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  4. Family Health Service. Child Health. Schedule of Hong Kong Childhood Immunisation Programme. Sep 2022. Available online: https://www.fhs.gov.hk/english/main_ser/child_health/child_health_recommend.html (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  5. World Health Organization. Vaccines and Immunization: Myths and Misconceptions. Newsroom. Oct 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/vaccines-and-immunization-myths-and-misconceptions (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  6. de Cantuária Tauil, M.; Sato, A.P.S.; Waldman, E.A. Factors associated with incomplete or delayed vaccination across countries: A systematic review. Vaccine 2016, 34, 2635–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cotter, J.J.; Bramble, J.D.; Bovbjerg, V.E.; Pugh, C.B.; McClish, D.K.; Tipton, G.; Smith, W.R. Timeliness of immunizations of children in a Medicaid primary care case management managed care program. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2002, 94, 833. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Smith, L.E.; Amlôt, R.; Weinman, J.; Yiend, J.; Rubin, G.J. A systematic review of factors affecting vaccine uptake in young children. Vaccine 2017, 35, 6059–6069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wei, F.; Mullooly, J.P.; Goodman, M.; McCarty, M.C.; Hanson, A.M.; Crane, B.; Nordin, J.D. Identification and characteristics of vaccine refusers. BMC Pediatrics 2009, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lau, Y.L.; Wong, W.H.S.; Hattangdi-Haridas, S.R.; Chow, C.B. Evaluating impact of school outreach vaccination programme in Hong Kong influenza season 2018–2019. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wong, W.H.-S.; Peare, S.; Lam, H.Y.; Chow, C.B.; Lau, Y.L. The estimated age-group specific influenza vaccine coverage rates in Hong Kong and the impact of the school outreach vaccination program. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2022, 18, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rochon, J.; Gondan, M.; Kieser, M. To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2012, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. World Health Organization. Immunization Coverage. Jul 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/immunization-coverage (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  14. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Chickenpox Vaccine to Incorporate into DH Childhood Immunisation Programme on July 2. Press Release. June 2014. Available online: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201406/24/P201406240290.htm (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  15. Hagemann, C.; Streng, A.; Kraemer, A.; Liese, J.G. Heterogeneity in coverage for measles and varicella vaccination in toddlers–analysis of factors influencing parental acceptance. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Huber, A.; Gazder, J.; Dobay, O.; Mészner, Z.; Horváth, A. Attitudes towards varicella vaccination in parents and paediatric healthcare providers in Hungary. Vaccine 2020, 38, 5249–5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Centre for Health Protection. Number of Notifiable Infectious Diseases by Month in 2021. Statistics. Oct 2022. Available online: https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/statistics/data/10/26/43/6940.html (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  18. Centre for Health Protection. Japanese Encephalitis. Health Topics. Aug 2018. Available online: https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/healthtopics/content/24/28.html (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  19. Centre for Health Protection. Meningococcal Infection. Health Topics. Sep 2020. Available online: https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/healthtopics/content/24/2086.html (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  20. Centre for Health Protection. Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Infection. Health Topics. July 2019. Available online: https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/healthtopics/content/24/8870.html (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  21. Centre for Health Protection. Rotavirus Infection. Health Topics. July 2019. Available online: https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/healthtopics/content/24/38.html (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  22. Yawn, B.P.; Xia, Z.; Edmonson, L.; Jacobson, R.M.; Jacobsen, S.J. Barriers to immunization in a relatively affluent community. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 2000, 13, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Smith, P.J.; Humiston, S.G.; Parnell, T.; Vannice, K.S.; Salmon, D.A. The association between intentional delay of vaccine administration and timely childhood vaccination coverage. Public Health Rep. 2010, 125, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brunson, E.K. The impact of social networks on parents’ vaccination decisions. Pediatrics 2013, 131, e1397–e1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. De Figueiredo, A.; Simas, C.; Karafillakis, E.; Paterson, P.; Larson, H.J. Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: A large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study. Lancet 2020, 396, 898–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bell, C.A.; Simmonds, K.A.; MacDonald, S.E. Exploring the heterogeneity among partially vaccinated children in a population-based cohort. Vaccine 2015, 33, 4572–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Antai, D. Gender inequities, relationship power, and childhood immunization uptake in Nigeria: A population-based cross-sectional study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 16, e136–e145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Baker, S.; Sanders, M.R.; Morawska, A. Who uses online parenting support? A cross-sectional survey exploring Australian parents’ internet use for parenting. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2017, 26, 916–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; McKee, M.; Torbica, A.; Stuckler, D. Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019, 240, 112552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Babirye, J.N.; Engebretsen, I.M.; Makumbi, F.; Fadnes, L.T.; Wamani, H.; Tylleskar, T.; Nuwaha, F. Timeliness of childhood vaccinations in Kampala Uganda: A community-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bondy, J.N.; Thind, A.; Koval, J.J.; Speechley, K.N. Identifying the determinants of childhood immunization in the Philippines. Vaccine 2009, 27, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bobo, J.K.; Gale, J.L.; Thapa, P.B.; Wassilak, S.G. Risk factors for delayed immunization in a random sample of 1163 children from Oregon and Washington. Pediatrics 1993, 91, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Barata, R.B.; de Almeida Ribeiro, M.C.S.; de Moraes, J.C.; Flannery, B.; Vaccine Coverage Survey 2007 Group. Socioeconomic inequalities and vaccination coverage: Results of an immunisation coverage survey in 27 Brazilian capitals, 2007–2008. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2012, 66, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Pruckner, G.J.; Schneeweis, N.; Schober, T.; Zweimüller, M. Birth order, parental health investment, and health in childhood. J. Health Econ. 2021, 76, 102426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fathima, P.; Gidding, H.F.; Snelling, T.L.; McIntyre, P.B.; Blyth, C.C.; Sheridan, S.; Liu, B.; de Klerk, N.; Moore, H.C. Timeliness and factors associated with rotavirus vaccine uptake among Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children: A record linkage cohort study. Vaccine 2019, 37, 5835–5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Slack, M.; Thwaites, R. Timing of immunisation of premature infants on the neonatal unit and after discharge to the community. Commun. Dis. Public Health 2000, 3, 303–304. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. McKechnie, L.; Finlay, F. Uptake and timing of immunisations in preterm and term infants. Prof. Care Mother Child 1999, 9, 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sisson, H.; Gardiner, E.; Watson, R. Vaccination timeliness in preterm infants: An integrative review of the literature. J. Clin. Nurs. 2017, 26, 4094–4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khader, Y.S.; Al-Akour, N.; AlZubi, I.M.; Lataifeh, I. The association between second hand smoke and low birth weight and preterm delivery. Matern. Child Health J. 2011, 15, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Crane, J.; Keough, M.; Murphy, P.; Burrage, L.; Hutchens, D. Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011, 118, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Treyster, Z.; Gitterman, B. Second hand smoke exposure in children: Environmental factors, physiological effects, and interventions within pediatrics. Rev. Environ. Health 2011, 26, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ngo, C.Q.; Phan, P.T.; Vu, G.V.; Chu, H.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, M.H.; Phan, H.T.; Ong, B.M.Y.; Vu, G.T.; Pham, K.T.H.; et al. Prevalence and sources of second-hand smoking exposure among non-smoking pregnant women in an urban setting of Vietnam. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Smith, P.J.; Marcuse, E.K.; Seward, J.F.; Zhao, Z.; Orenstein, W.A. Children and adolescents unvaccinated against measles: Geographic clustering, parents’ beliefs, and missed opportunities. Public Health Rep. 2015, 130, 485–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kaur, B. Attitudes, Risks and Norms: Understanding Parents’ Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Immunisation Decision-Making. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  45. Huang, J.; Chan, S.C.; Ko, S.; Wang, H.H.X.; Yuan, J.; Xu, W.; Zheng, Z.-J.; Xue, H.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, J.Y.; et al. Factors Associated with Vaccination Intention against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Population-Based Study. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Uptake rate of recommended vaccination.
Figure 1. Uptake rate of recommended vaccination.
Vaccines 11 00535 g001
Figure 2. Uptake rate of addition vaccination.
Figure 2. Uptake rate of addition vaccination.
Vaccines 11 00535 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of participants in the study.
Table 1. Characteristics of participants in the study.
nProportion%
Sex
Female84647.0%
Male95353.0%
Age (mean ± SD) 3.42 ± 0.50
Delivery
Vaginally and not induced (ref)96258.3%
Vaginally and induced 1358.2%
Caesarean section55233.5%
Weeks of pregnancy
40 weeks or more (ref)59035.8%
37–39 weeks97259.0%
36 weeks or less855.2%
Order of birth
First-born (ref)107965.3%
Second-born 47628.8%
Third-born975.9%
Monthly household income
Below HKD 15,000 26016.9%
HKD 15,000–HKD 29,99947230.6%
HKD 30,000 or above80952.5%
Educational background of mother
Primary school or below332.0%
Secondary school79748.8%
Post-secondary 80449.2%
Educational background of father
Primary school or below392.4%
Secondary school76547.4%
Post-secondary 80950.2%
Age group of mother (mean ± SD) 32.79 ± 4.61
24 or below794.9%
25–34102563.1%
35–3942226.0%
40 or above986.0%
Age group of father (mean ± SD) 36.11 ± 6.30
24 or below241.5%
25–3471644.9%
35–3950331.6%
40 or above35122.0%
Drinking during pregnancy (mother)
No157297.0%
Yes483.0%
Smoking during pregnancy (mother)
No160597.7%
Yes382.3%
Smoking during pregnancy (father)
No123275.9%
Yes39124.1%
Complications/health problems during pregnancy
No124075.1%
Yes41124.9%
Hospitalization since birth (toddler)
Never or 1 time only138678.6%
2 times or more37721.4%
Table 2. Factors associated with uptake of recommended vaccination.
Table 2. Factors associated with uptake of recommended vaccination.
nPrevalence %Adjusted Odd Ratio (aOR)95% CIp-Value
Sex
Female50559.7%1 (ref)
Male55658.3%0.9390.745–1.1840.595
Age0.6060.480–0.766<0.001 *
Delivery
Vaginally and not induced (ref)56058.2%1 (ref)
Vaginally and induced 8965.9%1.4100.891–2.2300.143
Caesarean section33360.3%0.9190.708–1.1940.528
Weeks of Pregnancy
40 weeks or more (ref)31453.2%1 (ref)
37–39 weeks62264.0%1.4591.136–1.8730.003 *
36 weeks or less4755.3%1.1810.675–2.0650.561
Order of birth
First-born (ref)69364.2%1 (ref)
Second-born 25152.7%0.6200.477–0.807<0.001 *
Third-born4041.2%0.3260.192–0.553<0.001*
Monthly household income
Below HKD 15,000 10138.8%1 (ref)
HKD 15,000-HKD 29,99925053.0%1.8011.270–2.5530.001 *
HKD 30,000 or above58071.7%3.4232.389–4.904<0.001 *
Educational background of mother
Primary school or below927.3%1 (ref)
Secondary school42553.3%2.1100.759–5.8630.152
Post-secondary 54367.5%2.0560.724–5.8400.176
Educational background of father
Primary school or below1538.5%1 (ref)
Secondary school41554.2%1.6240.687–3.8440.270
Post-secondary 53866.5%1.6740.687–4.0760.257
Age group of mothers (at toddler’s birth)
24 or below3139.7%1 (ref)
25–3460959.5%1.8700.993–3.5210.053
35–3926362.3%2.4491.217–4.9300.012 *
40 or above6061.2%2.8971.240–6.7660.014 *
Age group of father (at toddler’s birth)
24 or below1041.7%1 (ref)
25–3443761.0%1.5870.536–4.7020.404
35–3930460.4%1.2640.417–3.8320.679
40 or above20057.0%1.3020.423–4.0100.645
Drinking during pregnancy (mother)
No94059.8%1 (ref)
Yes3062.5%1.0190.506–2.0540.958
Smoking during pregnancy (mother)
No95959.8%1 (ref)
Yes2155.3%2.2070.914–5.3310.078
Smoking during pregnancy (father)
No77462.8%1 (ref)
Yes19850.6%0.9600.713–1.2920.786
Complications/health problems during pregnancy
No72158.1%1 (ref)
Yes26364.0%1.0190.777–1.3360.892
Hospitalization since birth (toddler)
Never or 1 time only81959.1%1 (ref)
2 times or more22960.7%1.1650.877–1.5470.293
* p values less than 0.05.
Table 3. Factors associated with uptake of additional vaccination.
Table 3. Factors associated with uptake of additional vaccination.
nPrevalence %Adjusted Odd Ratio (aOR)95% CIp-Value
Sex
Female59970.6%1 (ref)
Male68071.4%1.1380.884–1.4650.317
Age1.3151.018–1.6980.036 *
Delivery
Vaginally and not induced (ref)69472.0%1 (ref)
Vaginally and induced 9268.1%0.6460.409–1.0210.061
Caesarean section39972.3%0.7780.584–1.0370.087
Weeks of pregnancy
40 weeks or more (ref)39967.6%1 (ref)
37 – 39 weeks72374.2%1.2100.938–1.6070.136
36 weeks or less6272.9%1.9070.970–3.7470.061
Order of birth
First-born (ref)80874.7%1 (ref)
Second-born 31866.8%0.7420.556–0.9910.043 *
Third-born6061.9%0.5520.319–0.9550.034 *
Monthly household income
Below HKD 15,000 15860.3%1 (ref)
HKD 15,000-HKD 29,99931466.4%1.1430.794–1.6440.473
HKD 30,000 or above64479.6%1.6121.095–2.3720.016 *
Educational background of mother
Primary school or below2472.7%1 (ref)
Secondary school52966.2%0.5420.204–1.4430.344
Post-secondary 62577.8%0.6300.229–1.7340.371
Educational background of father
Primary school or below2974.4%1 (ref)
Secondary school50766.2%0.4740.191–1.1790.108
Post-secondary 62777.5%0.7380.286–1.9060.530
Age group of mothers (at toddler’s birth)
24 or below5468.4%1 (ref)
25–3473571.7%0.9680.494–1.8970.925
35–3930772.7%0.9720.461–2.0510.941
40 or above7172.4%1.0150.417–2.4730.973
Age group of father (at toddler’s birth)
24 or below1560.0%1 (ref)
25–3452973.8%1.7220.593–4.9960.317
35–3937774.8%1.9380.648–5.7950.236
40 or above23065.7%1.2540.414–3.7950.689
Drinking during pregnancy (mother)
No113472.0%1 (ref)
Yes3368.8%0.6950.334–1.4450.330
Smoking during pregnancy (mother)
No115471.8%1 (ref)
Yes2771.1%1.1940.463–3.0790.714
Smoking during pregnancy (father)
No89572.6%1 (ref)
Yes27770.5%1.4931.076–2.0730.016 *
Complications/health problems during pregnancy
No88471.1%1 (ref)
Yes30273.7%1.0790.803–1.4510.614
Hospitalization since birth (toddler)
Never or 1 time only97970.5%1 (ref)
2 times or more27974.0%1.4401.041–1.9900.027 *
Fully vaccinated
No42157.1%1 (ref)
Yes85680.8%2.7632.121–3.601<0.001 *
* p values less than 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, J.; Cheung, C.K.M.; Keung, V.M.W.; Lo, A.S.C.; Chan, S.C.; Pang, W.S.; Li, Q.H.Y.; Mui, L.W.H.; Lee, A.; Wong, M.C.S. Factors Associated with Vaccination Uptake among Young Children: A Follow-Up Study of 1799 Toddlers. Vaccines 2023, 11, 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030535

AMA Style

Huang J, Cheung CKM, Keung VMW, Lo ASC, Chan SC, Pang WS, Li QHY, Mui LWH, Lee A, Wong MCS. Factors Associated with Vaccination Uptake among Young Children: A Follow-Up Study of 1799 Toddlers. Vaccines. 2023; 11(3):535. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030535

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Junjie, Calvin K. M. Cheung, Vera M. W. Keung, Amelia S. C. Lo, Sze Chai Chan, Wing Sze Pang, Queenie H. Y. Li, Lancelot W. H. Mui, Albert Lee, and Martin C. S. Wong. 2023. "Factors Associated with Vaccination Uptake among Young Children: A Follow-Up Study of 1799 Toddlers" Vaccines 11, no. 3: 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030535

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop