Next Article in Journal
Polymyxins–Curcumin Combination Antimicrobial Therapy: Safety Implications and Efficacy for Infection Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the In Vivo Antioxidant Activity of an Anthocyanin-Rich Bilberry Extract Using the Caenorhabditis elegans Model
Previous Article in Journal
Superior Antioxidant Capacity of Berberis iliensis—HPLC-Q-TOF-MS Based Phytochemical Studies and Spectrophotometric Determinations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structure-Dependent Effects of Bisphosphonates on Inflammatory Responses in Cultured Neonatal Mouse Calvaria
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/antiox9060507
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Baicalein Inhibits Benzo[a]pyrene-Induced Toxic Response by Downregulating Src Phosphorylation and by Upregulating NRF2-HMOX1 System

by
Yuka Tanaka
1,
Takamichi Ito
1,
Gaku Tsuji
1,2 and
Masutaka Furue
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
2
Research and Clinical Center for Yusho and Dioxin, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
3
Division of Skin Surface Sensing, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2020, 9(6), 507; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060507
Submission received: 1 June 2020 / Accepted: 8 June 2020 / Published: 9 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Antioxidants in 2020)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), a major environmental pollutant, activates aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), induces its cytoplasmic-to-nuclear translocation and upregulates the production of cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1), a xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme which metabolize BaP. The BaP-AHR-CYP1A1 axis generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induces proinflammatory cytokines. Although the anti-inflammatory phytochemical baicalein (BAI) is known to inhibit the BaP-AHR-mediated CYP1A1 expression, its subcellular signaling remains elusive. In this study, normal human epidermal keratinocytes and HaCaT keratinocytes were treated with BAI, BaP, or BAI + BaP, and assessed for the CYP1A1 expression, antioxidative pathways, ROS generation, and proinflammatory cytokine expressions. BAI and BAI-containing herbal medicine Wogon and Oren-gedoku-to could inhibit the BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression. In addition, BAI activated antioxidative system nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2 (NRF2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1), leading the reduction of BaP-induced ROS production. The BaP-induced IL1A and IL1B was also downregulated by BAI. BAI inhibited the phosphorylation of Src, a component of AHR cytoplasmic complex, which eventually interfered with the cytoplasmic-to-nuclear translocation of AHR. These results indicate that BAI and BAI-containing herbal drugs may be useful for inhibiting the toxic effects of BaP via dual AHR-CYP1A1-inhibiting and NRF2-HMOX1-activating activities.

1. Introduction

Environmental pollution is a long-lasting problem for human health. Environmental pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminate the soil, food and air particles, including ambient particulate matter of up to 2.5 μm diameter (PM2.5) [1,2]. Among various PAHs, benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) accounts for 27%–67% of the toxicity of airborne particles [3]. BaP is emitted to the environment mostly from inefficient combustion of coal or from other industrial plants, and also from exhaust gas of vehicles such as automobile and airplane [4]. Once drawn into the body, BaP binds to a chemical sensor aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and is metabolized, and the metabolites trigger the following reactions, which eventually damage the cells [5,6].
AHR is a ligand-activated transcription factor and is abundantly expressed in skin cells including epidermal keratinocytes to sense environmental and endogenous chemicals [7,8,9,10]. In the absence of ligands, AHR localizes in the cytoplasm as a component of protein complex which consists of dimer of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 (XAP-2, also known as AIP or Ara9), p23 and c-Src protein kinase [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. After ligand binding, XAP-2 is released from the complex and triggers conformational changes in AHR that lead to AHR nuclear translocation by exposing its nuclear localizing signal [17]. In the nucleus, AHR dimerizes with AHR-nuclear translocator (ARNT), binds DNA response elements called xenobiotic response elements (XREs) and upregulates the transcription of phase I and II xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, such as phase I: Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1), CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 [8,9,10,18,19] and phase II: NAD(P)H quinone reductase-1 (NQO1), UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGT1A1 and UGT1A6), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) [6,20,21,22,23]. When it binds to AHR, BaP is oxidized by CYPs into epoxides and phenolic intermediates, which are further processed by phase II enzymes. The resulting 3,6-quinone undergoes redox cycles with generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and leads to oxidative stress [6,24,25]. The oxidative stress increases secretion of ATP, which in turn stimulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-6 [7,26,27,28,29,30,31].
On the other hand, accumulating evidence suggests that certain AHR agonists such as coal tar, soybean tar, cynaropicrin and Opuntia ficus-indica extract are capable of inhibiting BaP-AHR-mediated oxidative stress by activating the antioxidative master transcription factor nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2 (NRF2) and subsequently inducing antioxidative enzymes such as heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1) [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Under physiological conditions, NRF2 is localized in cytoplasm by its actin-bound inhibitor protein Kelch-like ECH-associated protein (Keap1). Oxidative stress dissociates the interaction between Keap1 and NRF2, and NRF2 commences to translocate into the nucleus where it heterodimerizes with musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog and interacts with antioxidant response elements (ARE). Then, gene expression of the downstream target genes such as HMOX1 and NQO1 is induced and protects cells from oxidative damages [38]. HMOX1 catalyzes heme to release free iron to form biliverdin which further metabolizes to carbon monoxide (CO) and bilirubin, and exerts antioxidative effect [38]. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that one of these antioxidative AHR agonists, tapinarof, has therapeutic potential for treating psoriasis and atopic dermatitis [39,40,41,42,43,44].
Baicalein (BAI) is one of the major active compounds found in the root of Scutellaria baicalensis [45,46,47]. It is also known to be a plant-derived AHR agonist with the structure of flavonoid and also the aglycone of the flavone glycoside baicalin (Figure 1). BAI is now attracting interest in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food industries due to its biological functions, such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidation, antibacterial and antitumor properties [48,49,50,51]. BAI is contained in the traditional crude drug Wogon (WO), which is made from the dried root of Scutellaria baicalensis. WO contains active compounds bailcalin and wogonin in addition to BAI, and is further mixed with other crude drugs to compose several herbal medicines, such as Oren-gedoku-to (OG, Huanglian-Jie-Du-Tang in Chinese). OG is used for alleviating the symptoms of various diseases including cerebrovascular disease, gastritis, liver dysfunction, dermatitis, inflammation, and so on [52,53,54,55].
Despite BAI being an AHR agonist and upregulating CYP1A1 expression in human HepG2 liver cancer cells [56], it paradoxically reduces the AHR-mediated CYP1A1 expression induced by 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) [57]. However, its subcellular mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, it is shown that BAI ameliorates BaP-induced AHR-CYP1A1 axis by inhibiting Src phosphorylation and subsequent AHR nuclear translocation, and that BAI also inhibits the BaP-induced ROS production and proinflammatory cytokine production via induction of NRF2-HMOX1 antioxidative pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a solvent and was also added to culture medium as a vehicle control. BAI, BaP (both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich), dasatinib (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and H2DCFDA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were all dissolved in DMSO as stock solution and further diluted in medium or buffers. The crude drug WO and the herbal medicine OG (both from Tsumura Co., Tokyo, Japan) were dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 10 mg/mL and heated at 50 °C for 60 min. After centrifugation, supernatants were collected and added to culture medium (final concentration: 100 μg/mL).

2.2. Cell Culture

Normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEKs; Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) were maintained in KBMTM GoldTM Basal Medium (Lonza) supplemented with KGMTM GoldTM SingleQuotsTM supplements (Lonza). Culture media were refreshed every 2 days, and cells were passaged at sub-confluence. NHEKs were used for experiments at fewer than four passages. An immortalized human keratinocyte cell line, HaCaT (Cell Lines Service, Eppelheim, Germany), was maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich) and penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Culture media were refreshed every 2–3 days and cells were passaged at sub-confluence. Cells were kept in a water-jacketed CO2 incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

2.3. Cell Proliferation Assay

NHEKs and HaCaT cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 5,000 cells/well and incubated for 24 h. They were then treated with DMSO (0.1%) or BAI (5, 10, 25, 50 or 100 μM) for 24 h. The viability of cells was determined using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. After incubation with chemicals, cells were treated with CCK-8 solution for 2–4 h which contains WST-8 coloring reagent. In live cells, WST-8 is reduced to WST-8 formazan (orange color with maximum absorption around 450 nm) and the amount of WST-8 formazan is proportional to the live cell number. Absorbance of the reaction product at 450 nm was measured using an iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and the results are shown as fold change compared with the DMSO-treated control.

2.4. Treatment of Cells for RNA and Protein Extraction

Cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 105 cells/well in 6-well plates and incubated for 48 h. They were then washed twice with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemicals Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and treated with medium containing DMSO (0.1%), BaP (1 μM), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells) or a combination of BaP and BAI. Cells were collected at 6 h for RNA extraction or at 12–24 h for protein extraction. Proteins of the cells were extracted with lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES, 10 mM Na4P2O7∙10H2O, 100 mM sodium fluoride, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1% Triton X-100) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich).
For the experiments with herbal drugs, HaCaT cells were seeded in a 6- or 12-well plate at a density of 3 × 105 or 1.5 × 105 cells/well and incubated for 48 h. Cells were then washed twice with DPBS and treated with fresh medium containing DMSO (0.1%), BAI (25 μM), BaP (1 μM), WO (100 μg/mL), OG (100 μg/mL) or combinations of BaP and BAI, BaP and WO, or BaP and OG. After 6 h (for RNA extraction) and 12–24 h (for protein extraction), cells were washed twice with DPBS and collected as mentioned above.

2.5. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

RNA was extracted from cells using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and converted to cDNA using PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan). PCR was performed on a CFX ConnectTM Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.) using TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Takara Bio Inc.) and specific primers. The PCR amplification schedule started with 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 20 s. Expression of each target gene was normalized with the cycle threshold of β-actin (ACTB) and the mRNA expression relative to the DMSO-treated control sample was calculated using the comparative Ct method. The primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) used were as follows: ACTB (forward 5′-ATTGCCGACAGGATGCAGA-3′, reverse 5′-GAGTACTTGCGCTCAGGAGGA-3′); AHR (forward 5′-CAAATCCTTCCAAGCGGCATA-3′, reverse 5′-CGCTGAGCCTAAGAACTGAAAG-3′); CYP1A1 (forward 5′-TAGACACTGATCTGGCTGCAG-3′, reverse 5′-GGGAAGGCTCCATCAGCATC-3′); IL1A (forward 5′-AGATGCCTGAGATACCCAAAACC-3′, reverse, 5′-CCAAGCACACCCAGTAGTCT-3′); IL1B (forward 5′-ATGATGGCTTATTACAGTGGCAA-3′, reverse 5′-GTCGGAGATTCGTAGCTGGA-3′); NQO1 (forward 5′-GAAGAGCACTGATCGTACTGGC-3′, reverse 5′-GGATACTGAAAGTTCGCAGGG-3′); Glutathione Peroxidase 2 (GPX2) (forward 5′-GGTAGATTTCAATACGTTCCGGG-3′, reverse 5′-TAGCAGTTCTCCTGATGTCCAAA-3′).

2.6. siRNA Transfection

Negative control siRNA or AHR siRNA (s1200) (both purchased from Invitrogen) was diluted with RNase-free water (Thermo Fisher Scientific), further mixed with Opti-MEMTM I Reduced Serum Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and LipofectamineTM RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. HaCaT cells were seeded in 12-well plates and mixed with siRNA-Lipofectamine complex (final siRNA concentration: 10 nM). After 48 h of incubation, cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BaP (1 μM) or BAI (25 μM) for 6 h and collected for RNA extraction. The knockdown efficiency of AHR at 48 h after transfection was determined by qRT-PCR and Western blotting.

2.7. ROS Measurement by Flow Cytometry

NHEKs or HaCaT cells were seeded in a 6- or 12-well plate at a density of 3 × 105 or 1.5 × 105 cells/well and incubated for 48 h. Cells were then washed twice with DPBS and treated with fresh medium containing DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BaP and BAI. Twelve hours later, cells were washed twice with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS; Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemicals Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and stained with 25 μM H2DCFDA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in HBSS for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. After washing with DPBS, cells were harvested and used for flow cytometry. Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of DCF dye was analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA). Propidium iodide (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to eliminate dead cells from the analysis.

2.8. Western Blotting

The extracted protein lysates were mixed with Sample Buffer Solution with 2-ME (2×) (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), heated at 96 °C for 5 min and used for SDS-PAGE on BoltTM 4%–12% Bis-Tris Plus Gels (Invitrogen). Then, the proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore, Burlington MA, USA), blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1% Tris-Buffered Saline with Tween (0.1% TBS-T) and probed with primary specific antibodies diluted in Can Get Signal® Immunoreaction Enhancer Solution 1 (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) at 4 °C overnight. The primary antibodies used were as follows: Rabbit anti-human Src antibody (#2123, 1:2000), rabbit anti-human phosphor-Src (Tyr416) antibody (#2101, 1:1000), rabbit anti-human β-actin antibody (#4970, 1:1000) (all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), rabbit anti-HO-1/HMOX1 (10701-AP, 1:1000, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA), rabbit anti-CYP1A1 antibody (ab3568, 1:500, Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-1 alpha antibody (ab9614, 1:1000, Abcam), rabbit IL-1β antibody (#12703, 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-human AHR (sc-5579, 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), and rabbit anti-human NRF2 (sc-13032, 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). After three washes with 0.1% TBS-T, membranes were further treated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (HRP-linked goat anti-rabbit IgG (#7074, 1:10,000, Cell Signaling Technologies)) diluted in Can Get Signal® Immunoreaction Enhancer Solution 2 (Toyobo Co., Ltd.) at room temperature for 60 min. Then, the membranes were washed three times with 0.1% TBS-T. Immunological bands were visualized with SuperSignalTM West Pico Chemiluminescence Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and imaged with the ChemiDocTM XRS Plus System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.), and the signals of blots were measured with Image Lab Software (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). The values of whole and cytoplasmic protein (CYP1A1, NRF2, HMOX1, IL1A, IL1B, and AHR) were normalized with the value of β-ACTIN and the values of nuclear protein (Lamin B1, NRF2, and AHR) were normalized with the value of Lamin B1.

2.9. Extraction of Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Protein

For the analysis of AHR/NRF2 nuclear translocation by Western blotting, cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins were separately extracted using NE-PERTM Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following its instructions. Briefly, HaCaT cells were seeded in a 6-well plate at a density of 3 × 105/well and incubated for 48 h. Cells were then treated with DMSO (0.1%) or BAI (25 μM) for 6 h (for the analysis of NRF2 nuclear translocation), or were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BaP (1 μM), BaP and BAI (25 μM) or BaP and dasatinib (100 nM) for 24 h (for the analysis of AHR nuclear translocation). After incubation, cells were washed twice with DPBS, harvested using cell scraper, and centrifuged to remove excess DPBS. The cell pellets were suspended in CER I reagent and incubated for 10 min on ice. Then, CER II reagent was added and the lysates were centrifuged at 16,000× g at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatants (cytoplasmic fraction) were transferred to new tubes and immediately stored at −80 °C until use. NER reagent was then added to the remaining pellet and the lysates were incubated on ice for 40 min. The lysates were mixed by vortex at every 10 min. After centrifugation at 16,000× g at 4 °C for 5 min, the supernatants (nuclear fraction) were transferred to new tubes and immediately stored at −80 °C until use.

2.10. Immunocytochemistry

HaCaT cells were seeded on an eight-well μ-Slide (ibidi GmbH, Martinsried, Germany) at a density of 3 × 104 cells/mL (equal to 1000 cells/well) and incubated for 48 h. After two washes with DPBS, cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%) or BAI (25 μM) for 6 h (for the analysis of NRF2 nuclear translocation), or were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BaP (1 μM), BaP and dasatinib (100 nM) or BaP and BAI (25 μM) for 24 h (for the analysis of AHR nuclear translocation). After incubation, cells were fixed with cold acetone, air-dried and treated with 5% BSA to avoid non-specific antibody binding. After three washes with DPBS, fixed cells were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The primary antibodies used were as follows: Rabbit anti-human AHR (sc-5579, 1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), rabbit anti-human NRF2 (sc-13032, 1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and mouse anti-human E-cadherin (610181, 1:200, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Cells were then washed three times with DPBS and further treated with Alexa Fluor® 546-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (A11010, 1:400, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (A11001, 1:400, Thermo Fisher Scientific) secondary antibodies in dark. After three washes with DPBS, cells were covered with Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and observed with an EVOS® FL fluorescent microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was performed in triplicate wells and repeated three times. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism7 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The significance of differences between two groups was determined by Student’s unpaired two-tailed t-test and that of three or more groups was determined by one-way ANOVA followed with multiple comparisons. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test normality of the samples. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to reflect statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. BAI Reduces BaP-Induced CYP1A1 Expression in Keratinocytes

To investigate the effects of BAI on the CYP1A1 expression in keratinocytes, cells were treated with BAI, BaP or both. The concentration of BaP was determined based on the previous report using the same cell type and methods of analyses, and the concentration is sufficient to activate AHR [58]. BAI did not affect cell proliferation up to 10 μM in NHEKs, and up to 25 μM in HaCaT cells, an immortalized human keratinocyte cell line [59] (Supplementary Figure S1). Thus, BAI at 10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells were used in the following experiments. As shown in Figure 2a,b, BaP significantly induced CYP1A1 mRNA expression (10.43 ± 0.062-fold increase in NHEKs and 30.11 ± 9.04-fold increase in HaCaT cells) compared with that of the DMSO-treated control, whereas BaP-induced CYP1A1 upregulation was significantly suppressed in the presence of BAI. Although BAI was shown to induce CYP1A1 expression in HepG2 liver cancer cells [56], it did not exhibit CYP1A1 upregulation in NHEKs (Figure 2a) but it induced only minimally in HaCaT cells, 10 times lower than that of BaP (Figure 2b). As well as mRNA, CYP1A1 protein expression was significantly induced by BaP and it was suppressed in the presence of BAI in both NHEKs and HaCaT cells (Figure 2a,b, Supplementary Figure S2). Thus, BAI can suppress BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression in normal as well as immortalized keratinocytes.
In addition, since BAI is a constituent of the crude drug WO and the WO-containing herbal drug OG, it was further tested whether these phytodrugs could inhibit BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression as did BAI. WO and OG were prepared in the boiled water (at 50 °C for 60 min) and added to the culture medium with BaP. As shown in Figure 2c, both WO and OG significantly reduced the BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression at mRNA and protein levels (Figure 2c and Supplementary Figure S2). WO caused stronger suppression of CYP1A1 than that of OG and its effect was comparable to that of BAI at mRNA and protein levels. These results imply that BAI and BAI-containing drugs may protect keratinocytes from the hazardous effects of BaP.

3.2. Baicalein Activates NRF2-HMOX1 Antioxidative Pathway

To know whether BAI is capable of activating antioxidative system, we next examined the activation, namely cytoplasmic-to-nuclear translocation, of NRF2. Immunocyochemical analysis showed that NRF2 was located in the cytoplasm in the DMSO-treated control keratinocytes, and BAI did induce its nuclear translocation (Figure 3a, arrows). NRF2 nuclear translocation was confirmed with Western blotting by separately extracting cytoplasmic and nuclear protein. As shown in Figure 3b, NRF2 protein was significantly increased in the nuclear fraction of BAI-treated cells compared to that of DMSO-treated cells (1.55 ± 0.144-fold increase, Figure 3b and Supplementary Figure S3a).
HMOX1 is a major downstream molecule of the antioxidative transcription factor NRF2 and activation of NRF2-HMOX1 pathway is crucial to protect keratinocytes from the oxidative damages [60,61]. To confirm HMOX1 upregulation in response to NRF2 nuclear translocation, HMOX1 expression was evaluated in keratinocytes. As shown in Figure 4, treatment with BAI significantly induced the HMOX1 mRNA expression in NHEKs (2.06 ± 0.210-fold increase) and in HaCaT cells (1.69 ± 0.0590-fold increase). BaP did not affect the HMOX1 expression and BAI was able to induce HMOX1 even in the presence of BaP. The expression pattern of HMOX1 protein was consistent with that of mRNA, HMOX1 was significantly induced in BAI-treated NHEKs (1.78 ± 0.131-fold increase) and HaCaT cells (1.50 ± 0.0996-fold increase) compared to DMSO-treated control (Figure 4a,b, middle and lower panels, Supplementary Figure S3b,c). BaP did not change HMOX1 expression and BAI induced HMOX1 even in the presence of BaP (Figure 4a,b, middle and lower panels, Supplementary Figure S3b,c). Similar to BAI, BAI-containing herbal drug WO and OG also induced mRNA and protein expressions of HMOX1 (Supplementary Figure S4). In addition to HMOX1, expressions of other antioxidative enzymes NQO1 and GPX2 downstream of NRF2 transcription factor were assessed. As shown in Supplementary Figure S5a, BAI significantly induced NQO1 and GPX2 in NHEKs or HaCaT keratinocytes and expression patterns of NQO1 and GPX2 were similar to that of HMOX1. WO significantly induced NQO1 and GPX2 and OG significantly induced NQO1, but not GPX2 (Supplementary Figure S5b). These results indicated that BAI and BAI-containing herbal drugs were activator of NRF2 antioxidative system.

3.3. Baicalein Inhibits BaP-Induced ROS Production in Keratinocytes

The production of ROS is one of the major hazardous effects of BaP. Therefore, we next examined whether BAI was capable of inhibiting BaP-induced ROS production. Keratinocytes were next treated with BaP, BAI or BaP + BAI and ROS production was assessed using flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 5, BaP significantly increased the MFI (i.e., production of ROS) in NHEKs (1.42 ± 0.0214-fold higher value) and in HaCaT cells (3.40 ± 0.30-fold higher value) than that of the DMSO-treated control. However, BaP-induced ROS generation was significantly inhibited in the presence of BAI. These results indicated that BAI-mediated antioxidative signal is functional in inhibiting the BaP-induced ROS production in keratinocytes.

3.4. BaP-Induced Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression Is Attenuated by Baicalein

Since BaP is also known to induce proinflammatory cytokines through AHR-CYP1A1 activation and subsequent ROS production, we next examined whether BAI could prevent the BaP-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression. The expression of IL1A mRNA was significantly induced by BaP (1.51 ± 0.047-fold increase in NHEKs and 2.46 ± 0.13-fold increase in HaCaT cells) compared with that in the vehicle-treated control and it was significantly reduced in the presence of BAI (Figure 6a). Similar phenomenon was observed regarding IL1B mRNA. BaP significantly induced IL1B in NHEKs (1.91 ± 0.11-fold increase) and in HaCaT cells (3.45 ± 0.42-fold increase) compared with that in the control, and BAI significantly reduced the BaP-induced IL1B expression (Figure 6b). In accordance with mRNA expression, IL1A and IL1B proteins were significantly induced by BaP and BAI significantly suppressed the BaP-induced IL1A and IL1B protein production (Figure 6c–f, Supplementary Figure S6). Single treatment of BAI significantly downregulated the mRNA/protein expressions of IL1A and IL1B in NHKEs (Figure 6). On the other hand, IL1A expression was slightly but significantly upregulated by BAI in HaCaT cells, although the level was lower than that of BaP. IL1B was not altered by BAI in HaCaT cells (Figure 6). We also assessed the AHR dependence of IL1A and IL1B induction by BaP through the knockdown of AHR using siRNA in HaCaT cells (Supplementary Figure S7). Knockdown efficiency was confirmed at AHR mRNA (knockdown efficiency: 87.56 ± 1.69% decrease compared with control siRNA) and AHR protein levels (knockdown efficiency: 58.77 ± 15.40% decrease compared with control siRNA) (Supplementary Figure S7a–c). Once AHR was knocked down, the induction of IL1A and IL1B by BaP was inhibited, confirming the AHR-dependent induction of these cytokines (Supplementary Figure S7d,e).

3.5. BaP-Induced Src Phosphorylation and AHR Nuclear Translocation Are Inhibited by Baicalein

To obtain further insight into the mechanisms by which BAI prevents the BaP/AHR-mediated CYP1A1 expression, we next examined the phosphorylation status of Src, which is known to form a protein complex with AHR in the cytoplasm. In the presence of BaP, phosphorylated Src was significantly increased compared with that of the control (2.58 ± 0.606-fold increase), which was prevented by treatment with both BAI and BaP in NHEKs (Figure 7a, Supplementary Figure S8a). In HaCaT cells, BAI reduced the level of phosphorylated Src compared with that in the control. The phosphorylation of Src was upregulated by BaP in HaCaT cells, which was downregulated in the presence of BAI, as in NHEKs (Figure 7b, Supplementary Figure S8b).
Furthermore, the status of AHR nuclear translocation was assessed, since an Src inhibitor Dasatinib reportedly prevents BaP-induced AHR nuclear translocation and inhibits the effect of BaP [62]. Dasatinib was used as a positive control, which inhibits BaP-induced AHR nuclear translocation by inhibiting Src. As shown in Figure 8a, BaP induced the nuclear translocation of AHR (Figure 8a, arrows), which was abrogated by the treatment with dasatinib or BAI. AHR nuclear translocation was confirmed with Western blotting by separately extracting cytoplasmic and nuclear protein. As shown in Figure 8b, AHR protein was significantly decreased in the cytoplasmic fraction of BaP-treated cells, whereas it was increased in the nuclear fraction of BaP-treated cells compared to that of DMSO-treated cells (1.56 ± 0.266-fold increase, Figure 8b and Supplementary Figure S8c). In the presence of dasatinib or BAI, BaP-induced AHR nuclear translocation was significantly inhibited. Taking all of these findings together, BAI likely prevents the deleterious effects of BaP through inhibiting Src phosphorylation and subsequent AHR nuclear translocation in keratinocytes.

4. Discussion

In daily life, we are exposed to environmental PAHs in tobacco smoke, diesel exhausts and industrial combustion emissions [4,63]. Among the PAHs, BaP is one of the best studied compounds, being known to induce oxidative stress, inflammation and carcinogenesis [63]. Since BaP is lipophilic, it easily crosses the cell membrane, binds to its receptor AHR, and triggers the AHR nuclear translocation, and subsequently upregulates xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes such as CYP1A1 which metabolizes BaP [6,8,9,10,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Resulting metabolites undergo redox cycles with generation of ROS and leading to oxidative stress [6,24,25]. The generated oxidative stress further stimulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines [7,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The flow of these reactions and emersion of hazardous effects by BaP or by other PAHs appear to be highly dependent on the AHR-CYP1A1 axis because they are attenuated in Ahr-deficient mice [64,65,66] and in Cyp1a1-deficient mice [24,25].
The inhibitory action of BAI on AHR-CYP1A1 axis has been reported by several groups [57,67]. In MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with DMBA, one of the PAHs, enzyme kinetic analysis revealed that BAI is a competitive inhibitor of CYP1A1 activity. In addition, AHR transactivation was suppressed by BAI in the cells treated with DMBA or BaP, suggesting the ability of BAI to prevent deleterious effect of these agents through inhibition of AHR-CYP1A1 axis [57]. Furthermore, in vivo analysis using BaP-induced lung carcinogenesis mouse model, oral administration of BAI (12 mg/kg body weight/week for 16 weeks) was found to significantly inhibit the induction of BaP-induced phase I and II enzymes in the lung. Moreover, BAI treatment reduced the BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression and effectively counteracted the BaP-induced oxidative damages [67]. In accordance with these reports, our results showed that BAI is able to inhibit the BaP-induced expression of CYP1A1 in keratinocytes. In the present study, BAI was likely to competitively inhibit the binding of BaP with AHR, and to eventually downregulate AHR-CYP1A1 axis. Since AHR-CYP1A1 axis is basically a detoxifying pathway, there might be a concern that inhibition of this pathway with BAI will interrupt the detoxification of BaP and will have adverse effects. However, the toxic effects of BaP are highly dependent on the AHR-CYP1A1 axis as the toxic effects were attenuated in Ahr- or Cyp1a1-defficient mice [24,25,64,65,66]. Thus, inhibition of BaP-AHR-CYP1A1 axis by BAI may diminish “metabolism” of BaP and may down-modulate its toxic effects, because BaP per se is not unlikely to exert further toxic effects unless it is metabolized. Of note, BAI-containing crude/herbal drugs (WO and OG) also significantly inhibited BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression (Figure 2c), implying their potential medicinal use to reduce deleterious effects of BaP or other PAHs.
BaP is known to induce cytoplasmic-to-nuclear translocation of AHR in parallel with Src phosphorylation, as demonstrated previously [14,15,24]. It is also reported that the extract of a flower Clematis apiifolia DC suppressed the BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression and Src phosphorylation, followed by the inhibition of AHR nuclear translocation in HaCaT cells. Since dasatinib, a known Src inhibitor, also inhibited BaP-induced AHR nuclear translocation, Src is suggested to be involved in the nuclear translocation of AHR [63]. Regarding Src, BAI has been reported to dephosphorylate Src and inhibit the malignant phenotypes of non-small cell lung cancer [68]. In agreement with those reports, our results showed that BAI inhibits the BaP-induced Src phosphorylation together with the inhibition of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear translocation of AHR. These results stress an essential role of Src activation in AHR nuclear translocation and BAI is likely to inhibit the BaP-induced AHR nuclear translocation by inhibiting the Src activation.
In this context, it should be mentioned that BAI itself slightly upregulated the AHR-CYP1A1 axis in HaCaT keratinocytes, but not in NHEKs (Figure 2a,b). Although direct comparison was not appropriate, Src was likely to be more phosphorylated in immortalized HaCaT keratinocytes than in normal primary keratinocytes (Figure 7a,b). This fact may underpin the discrepancy in BAI-AHR-CYP1A1 signaling between HaCaT cells (slight responders) and NHEKs (non-responders). In parallel with this, BAI was reported to activate the AHR-CYP1A1 axis in the human HepG2 liver cancer cell line in which Src is strongly phosphorylated, even under baseline conditions [56,69].
Similar to BAI, Mohebati and colleagues reported that a polyherbal formulation, Zyflamend, and its constituent carnosol, a polyphenol, suppress BaP-induced CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 expression in HaCaT cells. Although the AHR cytoplasmic complex contains HSP90, XAP-2, and p23 in addition to Src [17], they found that Zyflamend did not change the protein amount of HSP90, XAP-2, and p23. Instead of protein expression, inhibition of HSP90 ATPase activity is proposed as a mechanism underlying the Zyflamend/carnosol-mediated AHR-CYP1A1 inhibition [70]. Since the effect of BAI on HSP90 ATPase activity has not been reported, it should be assessed in future research to reveal more detailed mechanisms by which BAI modulate AHR-CYP1A1 axis.
In addition to the effects on AHR-CYP1A1 axis, BAI is known as an effective antioxidant. In HaCaT cells, BAI protected the cells from ultraviolet B by absorbing the radiation and also by scavenging ROS [71,72]. BAI has been reported to scavenge intracellular ROS by NRF2-mediated manganese superoxide dismutase and inhibited H2O2-induced DNA damage and apoptosis [73]. BAI is also known to exert its antioxidative activity through activation of the NRF2-HMOX1 antioxidative system [73,74,75]. In parallel with this, the present study showed that BAI induced the nuclear translocation of NRF2, upregulated the expression of antioxidative enzymes and downregulated the BaP-induced ROS generation in keratinocytes. Increased oxidative stress further upregulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines by inducing the secretion of ATP and activating its receptor P2 × 7R [29,30,31]. Thus, it is speculated that BaP-induced AHR-CYP1A1-ROS signal further increased the production of IL1A and IL1B, which was successfully prevented by the induction of NRF2 antioxidative system such as HMOX1.
Considering the potent activation of NRF2-HMOX1 system, BAI or BAI-containing drugs (WO and OG) may be beneficial for the treatment of various immunoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases in which the manipulation of NRF2-HMOX1 antioxidative system is one of the potential therapeutic approaches [76,77,78,79,80]. HMOX1 degrades heme and one of the end-product CO is known to have immunomodulatory properties [76]. Using murine autoimmune hepatitis model, NRF2 pathway was shown to be involved in the development and progression of autoimmune hepatitis, and CO-releasing molecule (CORM)-A1 improved several sero-immunological and histological parameters in the model mice [76]. In rats, induction of CO by CORM-A1 improved the clinical parameters of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis [77]. Based on a similar concept, the therapeutic potential of NRF2-HMOX1 pathway activation and CO induction has been reported in neuroinflammation [78], multiple sclerosis [79], and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [80]. Indeed, Li D and colleagues explained that BAI ameliorates pristine-induced lupus nephritis via activating NRF2-HMOX1 and suppressing inflammatory cytokine production in SLE mouse model [74].
Activation of NRF2 pathway is triggered by the disruption of interaction between NRF2 and Keap1. Since Keap1/NRF2/ARE pathway is important in defensing mechanism against oxidative stress, managing this pathway may provide beneficial effects on chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, atherosclerosis, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases [38]. In HepG2 cells, BAI was shown to target Keap1 to stimulate ubiquitination and modification of Keap1, leading to the activation of NRF2, cytoprotection and cancer chemoprevention [81]. It has also been reported that BAI protects rat pheochromocytoma cells against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neurotoxicity through the activation of Keap1/NRF2/HMOX1 pathway, indicating the potential use of BAI to prevent neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease [82].

5. Conclusions

Taken all together, the present report reveals that BAI acts as a potent inhibitor of the AHR-CYP1A1 axis through inhibition of Src phosphorylation and following AHR nuclear translocation, and that BAI also prevents oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokine production by scavenging ROS and activating NRF2-HMOX1 antioxidative axis in keratinocytes. BAI and BAI-containing Scutellaria baicalensis extracts may be beneficial as treatments for those with severe exposure to pollutants such as BaP and also for the diseases which are related to oxidative stress.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/9/6/507/s1, Figure S1: Cell viability of BAI-treated keratinocytes. Figure S2: Uncropped images of Western blotting corresponding to Figure 2. Figure S3: Uncropped images of Western blotting corresponding to Figure 3 and Figure 4. Figure S4: BAI-containing crude/herbal drugs induce HMOX1 expression in keratinocytes. Figure S5: BAI and BAI-containing crude/herbal drugs induce the expression of antioxidative genes downstream of NRF2 pathway. Figure S6: Uncropped images of Western blotting corresponding to Figure 6. Figure S7: BaP-mediated IL1A and IL1B induction is dependent on AHR. Figure S8: Uncropped images of Western blotting corresponding to Figure 7 and Figure 8.

Author Contributions

Y.T. performed all of the experiments with the help and advice of T.I., G.T. and M.F. Y.T. and M.F. wrote the first draft of the article. T.I. and G.T. reviewed the draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (grant number: H30-Shokuhin-Shittei-005).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peng, F.; Tsuji, G.; Zhang, J.Z.; Chen, Z.; Furue, M. Potential role of PM2.5 in melanogenesis. Environ. Int. 2019, 132, 105063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Furue, M.; Tsuji, G. Chloracne and hyperpigmentation caused by exposure to hazardous aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Petry, T.; Schmid, P.; Schlatter, C. The use of toxic equivalency factors in assessing occupational and environmental health risk associated with exposure to airborne mixtures of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). Chemosphere 1996, 32, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lawther, P.J.; Walter, R.E. Coal fires, industrial emissions and motor vehicles as sources of environmental carcinogens. IARC Sci. Publ. 1976, 13, 27–40. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bausinger, J.; Schütz, P.; Piberger, A.N.; Speit, G. Further characterization of Benzo[a]pyrene Diol-epoxide (BPDE)-induced comet assay effects. Mutagenesis 2016, 31, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Köhle, C.; Bock, K.W. Coordinate regulation of phase I and II xenobiotic metabolisms by the Ah receptor and Nrf2. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 73, 1853–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tsuji, G.; Takahara, M.; Uchi, H.; Takeuchi, S.; Mitoma, C.; Moroi, Y.; Furue, M. An environmental contaminant, Benzo[a]pyrene, induces oxidative stress-mediated interleukin-8 production in human keratinocytes via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathway. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2011, 62, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Esser, C.; Bargen, I.; Weighardt, H.; Haarmann-Stemmann, T.; Krutmann, J. Functions of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in the skin. Semin. Immunopathol. 2013, 35, 677–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Esser, C.; Rannug, A. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in barrier organ physiology, immunology, and toxicology. Pharmacol. Rev. 2015, 67, 259–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Furue, M.; Takahara, M.; Nakahara, T.; Uchi, H. Role of AhR/ARNT system in skin homeostasis. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2014, 306, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Agostinis, P.; Garmyn, M.; Van Laethem, A. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: An illuminating effector of the UVB response. Sci. STKE 2007, 403, pe49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Barouki, R.; Coumoul, X.; Fernandez-Salguero, P.M. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor, more than a xenobiotic-interacting protein. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 3608–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Enan, E.; Matsumura, F. Identification of c-Src as the integral component of the cytosolic ah receptor complex, transducing the signal of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) through the protein phosphorylation pathway. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996, 52, 1599–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fritsche, E.; Schäfer, C.; Calles, C.; Bernsmann, T.; Bernshausen, T.; Wurm, M.; Hübenthal, U.; Cline, J.E.; Hajimiragha, H.; Schroeder, P.; et al. Lightening up the UV response by identification of the arylhydrocarbon receptor as a cytoplasmatic target for ultraviolet B radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8851–8856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kazlauskas, A.; Sundström, S.; Poellinger, L.; Pongratz, I. The Hsp90 chaperone complex regulates intracellular localization of the dioxin receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 2594–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lees, M.J.; Peet, D.J.; Whitelaw, M.L. Defining the role for XAP2 in stabilization of the dioxin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 35878–35888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gutiérrez-Vázquez, C.; Quintana, F.J. Regulation of the immune response by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Immunity 2018, 48, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soshilov, A.; Denison, M.S. Role of the Per/Arnt/Sim domains in ligand-dependent transformation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 32995–33005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stockinger, B.; Di Meglio, P.; Gialitakis, M.; Duarte, J.H. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: Multitasking in the immune system. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 32, 403–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Emi, Y.; Ikushiro, S.; Iyanagi, T. Xenobiotic responsive element-mediated transcriptional activation in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase family 1 gene complex. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 3952–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Favreau, L.V.; Pickett, C.B. Transcriptional regulation of the rat NAD(P)H: Quinone reductase gene. identification of regulatory elements controlling basal level expression and inducible expression by planar aromatic compounds and phenolic antioxidants. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 4556–4561. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Fujisawa-Sehara, A.; Sogawa, K.; Yamane, M.; Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. Characterization of xenobiotic responsive elements upstream from the drug-metabolizing cytochrome P-450c gene: A similarity to glucocorticoid regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 4179–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rushmore, T.H.; King, R.G.; Paulson, K.E.; Pickett, C.B. Regulation of glutathione S-transferase Ya subunit gene expression: Identification of a unique xenobiotic-responsive element controlling inducible expression by planar aromatic compounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 3826–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Anandasadagopan, S.K.; Singh, N.M.; Raza, H.; Bansal, S.; Selvaraj, V.; Singh, S.; Chowdhury, A.R.; Leu, N.A.; Avadhani, N.G. β-naphthoflavone-induced mitochondrial respiratory damage in cyp1 knockout mouse and in cell culture systems: Attenuation by resveratrol treatment. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kopf, P.G.; Walker, M.K. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin increases reactive oxygen species production in human endothelial cells via induction of cytochrome P4501A1. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 245, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tanaka, Y.; Uchi, H.; Hashimoto-Hachiya, A.; Furue, M. Tryptophan photoproduct FICZ upregulates IL1A, IL1B, and IL6 expression via oxidative stress in keratinocytes. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tamaki, A.; Hayashi, H.; Nakajima, H.; Takii, T.; Katagiri, D.; Miyazawa, K.; Hirose, K.; Onozaki, K. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon increases mRNA level for interleukin 1 beta in human fibroblast-like synoviocyte line via aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ueng, T.H.; Hung, C.C.; Kuo, M.L.; Chan, P.K.; Hu, S.H.; Yang, P.C.; Chang, L.W. Induction of fibroblast growth factor-9 and interleukin-1alpha gene expression by motorcycle exhaust particulate extracts and Benzo[a]pyrene in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Toxicol. Sci. 2005, 87, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lavieri, R.; Rubartelli, A.; Carta, S. Redox stress unbalances the inflammatory cytokine network: Role in autoinflammatory patients and healthy subjects. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2016, 99, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Domercq, M.; Perez-Samartin, A.; Aparicio, D.; Alberdi, E.; Pampliega, O.; Matute, C. P2X7 receptors mediate ischemic damage to oligodendrocytes. Glia 2010, 58, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Onami, K.; Kimura, Y.; Ito, Y.; Yamauchi, T.; Yamasaki, K.; Aiba, S. Nonmetal haptens induce ATP release from keratinocytes through opening of pannexin hemichannels by reactive oxidative species. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 1951–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Haarmann-Stemmann, T.; Esser, C.; Krutmann, J. The janus-faced role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling in the skin: Consequences for prevention and treatment of skin disorders. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 2572–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Furue, M.; Uchi, H.; Mitoma, C.; Hashimoto-Hachiya, A.; Chiba, T.; Ito, T.; Nakahara, T.; Tsuji, G. Antioxidants for healthy skin: The emerging role of aryl hydrocarbon receptors and nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2. Nutrients 2017, 9, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nakahara, T.; Mitoma, C.; Hashimoto-Hachiya, A.; Takahara, M.; Tsuji, G.; Uchi, H.; Yan, X.; Hachisuka, J.; Chiba, T.; Esaki, H.; et al. Antioxidant Opuntia ficus-indica extract activates AHR-NRF2 signaling and upregulates filaggrin and loricrin expression in human keratinocytes. J. Med. Food 2015, 18, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Takei, K.; Mitoma, C.; Hashimoto-Hachiya, A.; Uchi, H.; Takahara, M.; Tsuji, G.; Kido-Nakahara, M.; Nakahara, T.; Furue, M. Antioxidant soybean tar glyteer rescues T-helper-mediated downregulation of filaggrin expression via aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J. Dermatol. 2015, 42, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tsuji, G.; Takahara, M.; Uchi, H.; Matsuda, T.; Chiba, T.; Takeuchi, S.; Yasukawa, F.; Moroi, Y.; Furue, M. Identification of ketoconazole as an AhR-Nrf2 activator in cultured human keratinocytes: The basis of its anti-inflammatory effect. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Van den Bogaard, E.H.; Bergboer, J.G.; Vonk-Bergers, M.; van Vlijmen-Willems, I.M.; Hato, S.V.; van der Valk, P.G.; Schröder, J.M.; Joosten, I.; Zeeuwen, P.L.; Schalkwijk, J. Coal tar induces AHR-dependent skin barrier repair in atopic dermatitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tu, W.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Liu, Q.; Sha, H. The anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant mechanisms of the Keap1/Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway in chronic diseases. Aging Dis. 2019, 10, 637–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bissonnette, R.; Poulin, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Tan, J.; Hong, H.C.; Webster, J.; Ip, W.; Tang, L.; Lyle, M. Efficacy and safety of topical WBI-1001 in patients with mild to severe atopic dermatitis: Results from a 12-Week, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012, 166, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bissonnette, R.; Bolduc, C.; Maari, C.; Nigen, S.; Webster, J.M.; Tang, L.; Lyle, M. Efficacy and safety of topical WBI-1001 in patients with mild to moderate psoriasis: Results from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled, phase II trial. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2012, 26, 1516–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Furue, M.; Hashimoto-Hachiya, A.; Tsuji, G. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Robbins, K.; Bissonnette, R.; Maeda-Chubachi, T.; Ye, L.; Peppers, J.; Gallagher, K.; Kraus, J.E. Phase 2, Randomized dose-finding study of tapinarof (GSK2894512 cream) for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019, 80, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Smith, S.H.; Jayawickreme, C.; Rickard, D.J.; Nicodeme, E.; Bui, T.; Simmons, C.; Coquery, C.M.; Neil, J.; Pryor, W.M.; Mayhew, D.; et al. Tapinarof is a natural ahr agonist that resolves skin inflammation in mice and humans. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 2110–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zang, Y.N.; Jiang, D.L.; Cai, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Xie, Z.W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.Y.; Jing, S.; Chen, G.H.; et al. Use of a dose-response model to guide future clinical trial of benvitimod cream to treat mild and moderate psoriasis. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 54, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liau, P.R.; Wu, M.S.; Lee, C.K. Inhibitory effects of Scutellaria baicalensis root extract on linoleic acid hydroperoxide-induced lung mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and antioxidant activities. Molecules 2019, 24, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oshima, N.; Narukawa, Y.; Hada, N.; Kiuchi, F. Quantitative analysis of anti-inflammatory activity of orengedokuto: Importance of combination of flavonoids in inhibition of PGE2 production in mouse macrophage-like cell line J774.1. J. Nat. Med. 2013, 67, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Y.S.; Cho, J.G.; Hwang, E.S.; Yang, J.E.; Gao, W.; Fang, M.Z.; Zheng, S.D.; Yi, T.H. Enhancement of protective effects of radix scutellariae on UVB-induced photo damage in human HaCaT keratinocytes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018, 184, 1073–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, W.; Ku, S.K.; Bae, J.S. Anti-inflammatory effects of baicalin, baicalein, and wogonin in vitro and in vivo. Inflammation 2015, 38, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lu, Y.; Joerger, R.; Wu, C. Study of the chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of ethanolic extracts from roots of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 10934–10942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lin, H.; Hao, Y.; Wan, X.; He, J.; Tong, Y. Baicalein inhibits cell development, metastasis and EMT and induces apoptosis by regulating ERK signaling pathway in osteosarcoma. J. Recept. Signal. Transduct. 2020, 40, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. De Oliveiar, M.R.; Nabavi, S.F.; Habtemariam, S.; Orhan, I.E.; Daglia, M.; Nabavi, S.M. The effect of baicalein and baicalin on mitochondrial function and dynamics: A review. Pharmacol. Res. 2015, 100, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kawasaki, K.; Nagasawa, H.; Kogure, K. Effect of orengedoku-to on cerebral vascular accident. Pharma Med. 1988, 6, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ohta, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Nishida, K.; Sasaki, E.; Ishiguro, I. Preventive effect of oren-gedoku-to (Huanglian-Jie-Du-Tang) extract on the development of stress-induced acute gastric mucosal lesions in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 67, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, L.M.; Mineshita, S. Preventive effects of unsei-in and oren-gedoku-to, chinese traditional medicines, against rat paw oedema and abdominal constriction in mice. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996, 48, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ito, H. Application of oren-gedoku-to to many illnesses in japanese oriental medicine kampo. Newest Ther. 2001, 10, 243–246. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, S.; Qin, C.; Safe, S.H. Flavonoids as aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists/antagonists: Effects of structure and cell context. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1877–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chan, H.Y.; Chen, Z.Y.; Tsang, D.S.; Leung, L.K. Baicalein inhibits DMBA-DNA adduct formation by modulating CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 activities. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2002, 56, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Uchi, H.; Yasumatsu, M.; Morino-Koga, S.; Mitoma, C.; Furue, M. Inhibition of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling and induction of NRF2-mediated antioxidant activity by cinnamaldehyde in human keratinocytes. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2017, 85, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Boukamp, P.; Petrussevska, R.T.; Breitkreutz, D.; Hornung, J.; Markham, A.; Fusenig, N.E. Normal keratinization in a spontaneously immortalized aneuploid human keratinocyte cell line. J. Cell. Biol. 1988, 106, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Park, C.; Cha, H.J.; Hong, S.H.; Kim, G.Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, B.W.; Joen, Y.J.; Choi, Y.Y. Protective effect of phloroglucinol on oxidative stress-induced DNA damage and apoptosis through activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway in HaCaT human keratinocytes. Mar. Drugs. 2019, 17, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, J.; Oh, J.; Anerilla, J.N.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, J.S. Grape peel extract and resveratrol inhibit wrinkle formation in mice model through activation of Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 1600–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lee, S.E.; Park, S.H.; Yoo, J.A.; Kwon, K.; Kim, J.W.; Oh, S.W.; Park, S.J.; Kim, J.; Yu, E.; Han, B.S.; et al. Antagonizing effects of Clematis apiifolia DC. extract against Benzo[a]pyrene-induced damage to human keratinocytes. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shi, Q.; Godschalk, R.W.L.; van Schooten, F.J. Inflammation and the chemical carcinogen Benzo[a]pyrene: Partners in crime. Mutat. Res. 2017, 774, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dertinger, S.D.; Nazarenko, D.A.; Silverstone, A.E.; Gasiewicz, T.A. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling plays a significant role in mediating Benzo[a]pyrene- and cigarette smoke condensate-induced cytogenetic damage in vivo. Carcinogenesis 2001, 22, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  65. Shimizu, Y.; Nakatsuru, Y.; Ichinose, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Kume, H.; Mimura, J.; Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.; Ishikawa, T. Benzo[a]pyrene carcinogenicity is lost in mice lacking the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 779–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mimura, J.; Yamashita, K.; Nakamura, K.; Morita, M.; Takagi, T.N.; Nakao, K.; Ema, M.; Sogawa, K.; Yasuda, M.; Katsuki, M.; et al. Loss of teratogenic response to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in mice lacking the ah (Dioxin) receptor. Genes Cells 1997, 2, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Naveenkumar, C.; Raghunandakumar, S.; Asokkumar, S.; Binuclara, J.; Rajan, B.; Premkumar, T.; Devaki, T. Mitigating role of baicalein on lysosomal enzymes and xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme status during lung carcinogenesis of swiss albino mice induced by Benzo(a)pyrene. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 28, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhao, Z.; Liu, B.; Sun, J.; Lu, L.; Liu, L.; Qiu, J.; Li, Q.; Yan, C.; Jiang, S.; Mohammadtursun, N.; et al. Scutellaria flavonoids effectively inhibit the malignant phenotypes of non-small cell lung cancer in an Id1-dependent manner. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 15, 1500–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, M.; Tian, F.; Ying, W.; Qian, X. Quantitative proteomics reveal the anti-tumour mechanism of the carbohydrate recognition domain of Galectin-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mohebati, A.; Guttenplan, J.B.; Kochhar, A.; Zhao, Z.L.; Kosinska, W.; Subbaramaiah, K.; Dannenberg, A.J. Hydrocarvon receptor-mediated activation of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 transcription and mutagenesis. Cancer Prev. Res. 2012, 5, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Oh, M.C.; Piao, M.J.; Fernando, P.M.; Han, X.; Madduma Hewage, S.R.; Park, J.E.; Ko, M.S.; Jung, U.; Kim, I.G.; Hyun, J.W. Baicalein protects human skin cells against ultraviolet B-induced oxidative stress. Biomol. Ther. 2016, 24, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kimura, Y.; Sumiyoshi, M. Effects of baicalein and wogonin isolated from Scutellaria baicalensis roots on skin damage in acute UVB-irradiated hairless mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 661, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kang, K.A.; Zhang, R.; Piao, M.J.; Chae, S.; Kim, H.S.; Park, J.H.; Jung, K.S.; Hyun, J.W. Baicalein inhibits oxidative stress-induced cellular damage via antioxidant effects. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2012, 28, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Li, D.; Shi, G.; Wand, J.; Zhang, D.; Pan, Y.; Dou, H.; Hou, Y. Baicalein ameliorates pristine-induced lupus nephritis via activating Nrf2/HO-1 in myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019, 21, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ma, J.; Li, S.; Zhu, L.; Guo, S.; Yi, X.; Cui, T.; Hey, Y.; Chang, Y.; Liu, B.; Li, C.; et al. Baicalein protects human vitiligo melanocytes from oxidative stress through axtivation of NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) signaling pathway. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 129, 492–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mangano, K.; Cavalli, E.; Manmmana, S.; Basile, M.S.; Caltabiano, R.; Pesce, S.; Puleo, S.; Atanasov, A.G.; Magro, G.; Niciletti, F.; et al. Involvement of the Nrf2/HO-1/CO axis and therapeutic intervention with the CO-releasing molecule CORM-A1, in a murine model of autoimmune hepatitis. J. Cell Physiol. 2018, 233, 4156–4165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fagone, P.; Mangano, K.; Mammana, S.; Cavalli, E.; Marco, R.D.; Barcellona, M.L.; Salvatorelli, L.; Magro, G.; Nicoletti, F. Carbon monoxide-releasing molecule-A1 (CORM-A1) improves clinical signs of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) in rats. Clin. Immunol. 2015, 157, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chora, A.A.; Fontoura, P.; Cunha, A.; Pais, T.F.; Cardoso, S.; Ho, P.P.; Lee, L.Y.; Sobel, R.A.; Steinman, L.; Soares, M.P. Heme oxygenase-1 and carbon monoxide suppress autoimmune neuroinflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fagone, P.; Mangano, K.; Coco, M.; Perciavalle, V.; Garotta, G.; Romao, C.C.; Nicoletti, F. Therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide in multiple sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2012, 167, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mackern-Oberti, J.P.; Llanos, C.; Carreño, L.J.; Riquelme, S.A.; Jacobelli, S.H.; Anegon, I.; Kalergis, A.M. Carbon monoxide exposure improves immune function in lupus-prone mice. Immunology 2013, 140, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qin, S.; Deng, F.; Wu, W.; Jiang, L.; Yamashiro, T.; Yano, S.; Hou, D.X. Baicalein modulates Nrf2/Keap1 system in both Keap1-dependent and Keap1-independent mechanisms. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 559, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhang, A.; Cui, W.; Li, G.; Yuan, S.; Xu, D.; Hoi, M.P.M.; Lin, Z.; Dou, J.; Han, Y.; Lee, S.M.Y. Baicalein protects against 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity through activation of Keap1/Nrf2/HO-1 and involving PKCα and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8171–8182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antioxidants 09 00507 g001
Figure 1. Structure of baicalein (BAI). The structure of BAI is shown.
Figure 1. Structure of baicalein (BAI). The structure of BAI is shown.
Antioxidants 09 00507 g001
Antioxidants 09 00507 g002
Figure 2. BAI inhibits BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression in keratinocytes. (a) NHEKs or (b) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP and assessed for CYP1A1 mRNA expression (upper panels) at 6 h- or CYP1A1 protein expression (middle and lower panels) at 24 h-post treatment. (c) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (25 μM), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BaP and BAI, BaP and WO, or BaP and OG, and assessed for CYP1A1 mRNA expression (upper panels) at 6 h or CYP1A1 protein expression (middle and lower panels) at 24 h post treatment. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (middle panels) and mean ± SD of CYP1A1/β-ACTIN ratio (lower panels) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. BAI inhibits BaP-induced CYP1A1 expression in keratinocytes. (a) NHEKs or (b) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP and assessed for CYP1A1 mRNA expression (upper panels) at 6 h- or CYP1A1 protein expression (middle and lower panels) at 24 h-post treatment. (c) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (25 μM), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BaP and BAI, BaP and WO, or BaP and OG, and assessed for CYP1A1 mRNA expression (upper panels) at 6 h or CYP1A1 protein expression (middle and lower panels) at 24 h post treatment. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (middle panels) and mean ± SD of CYP1A1/β-ACTIN ratio (lower panels) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Antioxidants 09 00507 g002
Antioxidants 09 00507 g003
Figure 3. BAI induces NRF2 nuclear translocation. (a) HaCaT cells were treated with DMOS (0.1%) or BAI (25 μM) for 6 h and nuclear translocation of NRF2 was examined using immunocytochemistry. E-cadherin was stained simultaneously as a marker of plasma membrane. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Experiments were repeated three times and the representative images (left panels) are shown. Scale bar = 100 μm. (b) HaCaT cells were treated as for (a) and cytoplasmic and nuclear fraction were separately extracted. β-ACTIN and Lamin B1 were used as internal controls of cytoplasmic or nuclear protein. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (right upper panels) and mean ± SD of relative NRF2/β-ACTIN and NRF2/Lamin B1 ratio (right lower panels) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S3a. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. BAI induces NRF2 nuclear translocation. (a) HaCaT cells were treated with DMOS (0.1%) or BAI (25 μM) for 6 h and nuclear translocation of NRF2 was examined using immunocytochemistry. E-cadherin was stained simultaneously as a marker of plasma membrane. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Experiments were repeated three times and the representative images (left panels) are shown. Scale bar = 100 μm. (b) HaCaT cells were treated as for (a) and cytoplasmic and nuclear fraction were separately extracted. β-ACTIN and Lamin B1 were used as internal controls of cytoplasmic or nuclear protein. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (right upper panels) and mean ± SD of relative NRF2/β-ACTIN and NRF2/Lamin B1 ratio (right lower panels) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S3a. * p < 0.05.
Antioxidants 09 00507 g003
Antioxidants 09 00507 g004
Figure 4. BAI inducesHMOX1 expression. (a) NHEKs and (b) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP and assessed for HMOX1 mRNA expression (upper panels) at 6 h or HMOX1 protein expression (middle and lower panels) at 12 h post treatment. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (middle panels) and mean ± SD of relative HMOX1/β-ACTIN ratio (lower panels) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S3b,c. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. BAI inducesHMOX1 expression. (a) NHEKs and (b) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP and assessed for HMOX1 mRNA expression (upper panels) at 6 h or HMOX1 protein expression (middle and lower panels) at 12 h post treatment. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (middle panels) and mean ± SD of relative HMOX1/β-ACTIN ratio (lower panels) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S3b,c. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Antioxidants 09 00507 g004
Antioxidants 09 00507 g005
Figure 5. BAI exerts antioxidative effects against BaP. (a) NHEKs or (b) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP for 12 h and ROS production was measured by flow cytometry. A representative histogram image of mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of DCF (excitation: 480 nm, emission: 530 nm) (left) and mean ± SD of MFI (right) are shown. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. BAI exerts antioxidative effects against BaP. (a) NHEKs or (b) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP for 12 h and ROS production was measured by flow cytometry. A representative histogram image of mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of DCF (excitation: 480 nm, emission: 530 nm) (left) and mean ± SD of MFI (right) are shown. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. *** p < 0.001.
Antioxidants 09 00507 g005
Antioxidants 09 00507 g006
Figure 6. BAI inhibits BaP-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression in keratinocytes. (a,b) NHEKs and HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP for 6 h and assessed for (a) IL1A and (b) IL1B expression. (c–f) NHEKs or HaCaT cells were treated as (a,b). After 24 h, cells were harvested and protein expressions of (c–e) IL1A and (c,d,f) IL1B were assessed. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (left lower panels) and mean ± SD of relative IL1A/β-ACTIN and IL1B/β-ACTIN ratio (right lower panels) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S6. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6. BAI inhibits BaP-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression in keratinocytes. (a,b) NHEKs and HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP for 6 h and assessed for (a) IL1A and (b) IL1B expression. (c–f) NHEKs or HaCaT cells were treated as (a,b). After 24 h, cells were harvested and protein expressions of (c–e) IL1A and (c,d,f) IL1B were assessed. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (left lower panels) and mean ± SD of relative IL1A/β-ACTIN and IL1B/β-ACTIN ratio (right lower panels) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S6. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Antioxidants 09 00507 g006
Antioxidants 09 00507 g007
Figure 7. BaP-induced Src phosphorylation is inhibited by BAI. (a) NHEKs and (b) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP for 24 h and Src phosphorylation was assessed by Western blotting. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (left) and mean ± SD of relative pSrc/Src ratio (right) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S8a,b. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. BaP-induced Src phosphorylation is inhibited by BAI. (a) NHEKs and (b) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BAI (10 μM for NHEKs and 25 μM for HaCaT cells), BaP (1 μM) or a combination of BAI and BaP for 24 h and Src phosphorylation was assessed by Western blotting. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Representative blot images (left) and mean ± SD of relative pSrc/Src ratio (right) are shown. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S8a,b. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Antioxidants 09 00507 g007
Antioxidants 09 00507 g008
Figure 8. BaP-induced AHR nuclear translocation is prevented by BAI. (a) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BaP (1 μM), the combination of BaP and dasatinib (100 nM) or the combination of BaP and BAI (25 μM) for 24 h and nuclear translocation of AHR was examined using immunocytochemistry. E-cadherin staining indicates plasma membrane and arrows indicate AHR that translocated to the nucleus. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Scale bar = 100 μm. (b) HaCaT cells were treated as in (a) and cytoplasmic and nuclear fraction were separately extracted. β-ACTIN and Lamin B1 were used as internal controls of cytoplasmic or nuclear protein. Representative blot images (upper panels) and mean ± SD of relative AHR/β-ACTIN and AHR/Lamin B1 ratio (lower panels) are shown. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S8c. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 8. BaP-induced AHR nuclear translocation is prevented by BAI. (a) HaCaT cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%), BaP (1 μM), the combination of BaP and dasatinib (100 nM) or the combination of BaP and BAI (25 μM) for 24 h and nuclear translocation of AHR was examined using immunocytochemistry. E-cadherin staining indicates plasma membrane and arrows indicate AHR that translocated to the nucleus. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Scale bar = 100 μm. (b) HaCaT cells were treated as in (a) and cytoplasmic and nuclear fraction were separately extracted. β-ACTIN and Lamin B1 were used as internal controls of cytoplasmic or nuclear protein. Representative blot images (upper panels) and mean ± SD of relative AHR/β-ACTIN and AHR/Lamin B1 ratio (lower panels) are shown. Experiments were performed in triplicate wells and each experiment was repeated three times. Whole blot images are shown in Supplementary Figure S8c. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001.
Antioxidants 09 00507 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanaka, Y.; Ito, T.; Tsuji, G.; Furue, M. Baicalein Inhibits Benzo[a]pyrene-Induced Toxic Response by Downregulating Src Phosphorylation and by Upregulating NRF2-HMOX1 System. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060507

AMA Style

Tanaka Y, Ito T, Tsuji G, Furue M. Baicalein Inhibits Benzo[a]pyrene-Induced Toxic Response by Downregulating Src Phosphorylation and by Upregulating NRF2-HMOX1 System. Antioxidants. 2020; 9(6):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060507

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanaka, Yuka, Takamichi Ito, Gaku Tsuji, and Masutaka Furue. 2020. "Baicalein Inhibits Benzo[a]pyrene-Induced Toxic Response by Downregulating Src Phosphorylation and by Upregulating NRF2-HMOX1 System" Antioxidants 9, no. 6: 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060507

APA Style

Tanaka, Y., Ito, T., Tsuji, G., & Furue, M. (2020). Baicalein Inhibits Benzo[a]pyrene-Induced Toxic Response by Downregulating Src Phosphorylation and by Upregulating NRF2-HMOX1 System. Antioxidants, 9(6), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060507

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop