1. Introduction
Cutaneous photoaging, driven predominantly by chronic ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation, is one of the most prevalent dermatological conditions worldwide and a major risk factor for skin malignancies [
1,
2]. Clinically, UVB-damaged skin manifests as erythema, edema, deep wrinkles, loss of elasticity, and impaired barrier function, collectively imposing substantial dermatological and psychosocial burdens [
3,
4]. Although topical retinoids such as all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) remain the clinical gold standard for photoaging intervention, their utility is constrained by frequent cutaneous irritation, photosensitization, and limited applicability in sensitive populations—including individuals with reactive or compromised skin barriers, those requiring long-term maintenance therapy, and women during pregnancy or lactation [
5,
6]. Safer and better-tolerated alternatives for photoaging intervention thus remain a pressing dermatological priority [
7].
At the subcellular level, mitochondrial dysfunction has emerged as the central pathogenic driver of UVB-induced cutaneous photoaging [
8,
9]. UVB photons directly damage mitochondrial DNA, disrupt electron transport chain integrity, and trigger excessive mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) generation [
10,
11]. Unlike transient cytosolic oxidative bursts, UVB-induced mtROS establishes a self-amplifying loop in which damaged mitochondria produce more ROS, which in turn further damages mtDNA and electron transport chain components, ultimately driving keratinocyte senescence, dermal fibroblast dysfunction, matrix metalloproteinase activation, and collagen degradation [
12,
13]. Conventional water-soluble antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) cannot efficiently penetrate the inner mitochondrial membrane, while engineered mitochondria-targeted antioxidants such as MitoTEMPO and MitoQ act as symptomatic radical scavengers without addressing the underlying mitochondrial quality defects [
14,
15]. These limitations highlight an urgent need for therapeutic strategies that target the upstream causes of mitochondrial oxidative stress, with restoration of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)–peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α) mitochondrial biogenesis program—the master regulator of mitochondrial quality control in skin cells—representing a particularly attractive avenue [
16,
17,
18].
AKG, a tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediate, occupies a unique metabolic-signaling nexus by serving as an essential co-substrate for the α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase (α-KGDD) superfamily, which couples AKG decarboxylation to substrate hydroxylation in an Fe(II)- and O
2-dependent manner, which includes prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs), Jumonji-domain histone demethylases, and ten-eleven translocation DNA demethylases [
19,
20,
21]. Among α-KGDD substrates, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) is the most extensively characterized: under sufficient AKG, PHDs hydroxylate HIF-1α at conserved proline residues, recruiting the von Hippel–Lindau E3 ubiquitin ligase for proteasomal degradation [
22,
23]. When α-KGDD activity is compromised by oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, or AKG depletion, HIF-1α aberrantly accumulates under normoxia—a state termed pseudohypoxia—which has been increasingly recognized as a maladaptive driver of metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial dysfunction [
24,
25]. Notably, exogenous AKG supplementation has been shown to extend lifespan, delay age-associated decline, and exert cytoprotective effects across model organisms and aging mice [
26,
27,
28], yet its specific role in UVB-induced skin photoaging remains poorly characterized. Emerging evidence further suggests that aberrant HIF-1α stabilization can suppress AMPK phosphorylation and disable PGC-1α-driven mitochondrial biogenesis [
29,
30], raising the provocative possibility that α-KGDD inactivation and consequent HIF-1α accumulation may serve as the upstream molecular event linking UVB stress to mitochondrial biogenesis failure in keratinocytes [
31,
32].
We hypothesized that AKG attenuates UVB-induced skin photoaging by restoring α-KGDD/PHD catalytic activity, thereby promoting HIF-1α degradation and relieving the associated suppression of AMPK–PGC-1α/TFAM signaling to re-establish mitochondrial redox homeostasis. To test this, we first characterized the in vivo photoprotective phenotype in SKH1 mice—skin physiological indices, histology (HE, Masson), and collagen/elastic-fibre integrity—across CK, UVB, ATRA, and low/medium/high topical AKG. We then applied skin transcriptomics (RNA-seq with gene-set enrichment) to identify the pathways underlying this protection, which converged on mitochondrial oxidative-stress and HIF/AMPK-related signatures. Guided by these findings, we used a HaCaT keratinocyte model to dissect the mechanism, measuring total and mitochondrial ROS, mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) and ATP, followed by the proposed signaling nodes—α-KGDD/PHD activity, HIF-1α abundance, AMPK Thr172 phosphorylation, and PGC-1α/TFAM expression—using the pharmacological probes DMOG (α-KGDD inhibition), compound C (AMPK inhibition), and MitoTEMPO (mitochondrial antioxidant) to establish the necessity and order of each node. This sequence—in vivo phenotype → transcriptomic pathway identification → in vitro mechanistic dissection—structures the present study.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Reagents and Antibodies
α-ketoglutarate (AKG, #75890), dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG, a competitive inhibitor of α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, #D3695), compound C (CC, also known as dorsomorphin, a reversible AMPK inhibitor, #P5499), all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA, #R2625), MitoTEMPO (a mitochondria-targeted superoxide dismutase mimetic, #SML0737), and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC, #A7250) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Propylene glycol (PG, ≥99.5% purity, #P108208) and polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400, # P774684) used for the topical vehicle formulation were purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Primary antibodies for Western blotting were obtained from Proteintech Group (Wuhan, China): anti-HIF-1α (#20960-1-AP, 1:10,000), anti-LKB1 (#10746-1-AP, 1:5000), anti-AMPKα (#10929-2-AP, 1:10,000), anti-phospho-AMPKα (Thr172) (#80209-6-RR, 1:5000), anti-ACC (#21923-1-AP, 1:10,000), anti-phospho-ACC (Ser79) (#80281-2-RR, 1:5000), anti-PGC-1α (#66369-1-Ig, 1:10,000), anti-TFAM (#82745-5-RR, 1:10,000), and anti-GAPDH (#60004-1-Ig, 1:50,000). HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (#SA00001-2) and goat anti-mouse IgG (#SA00001-1) (Proteintech) were used as secondary antibodies (1:10,000).
The following assay kits were employed: Reactive Oxygen Species Assay Kit (DCFH-DA, #KGA7308-100, KeyGEN BioTECH, Nanjing, China); Mitochondrial Superoxide Assay Kit (MitoSOX™ Red, #S0061S), Enhanced Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit (JC-1, #C2003S), Enhanced ATP Assay Kit (#S0027), BCA Protein Assay Kit (#P0012), and Hoechst 33342 (#C1022) (all from Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China); Superoxide Dismutase (SOD, #A001-3-2), Catalase (CAT, #A007-1-1), and Malondialdehyde (MDA, #A003-1-2) assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade. For microneedle-assisted transdermal delivery in vivo, sterile titanium-alloy microneedle dermal rollers (Hauros brand, 540 needles per drum, 0.2 mm needle length; Hebei Xiongan Qisen Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Xiongan New Area, Hebei, China) were used.
2.2. Animals and Ethics Statement
Female SKH1 hairless mice (6–8 weeks old, 18–20 g) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th edition, 2011) and reported in compliance with the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines. The protocol was approved by the Laboratory Animal Welfare and Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of Beijing Gushi Test Technology Co., Ltd. (the animal experimentation facility affiliated with the Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China), under Approval No. GSCS-2025-011 (approved on 26 June 2025). Mice were individually housed in ventilated cages under specific pathogen-free conditions with a 12-h light/dark cycle, 22 ± 2 °C ambient temperature, and 50 ± 10% relative humidity. Standard rodent chow and autoclaved water were provided ad libitum. Mice were acclimatized for one week before the experiments. Sample size (
n = 6 per group) was determined based on previous photoaging studies [
33] and a power analysis assuming 30% mean difference and 20% standard deviation between groups (α = 0.05, power = 0.8). Predefined humane endpoints (≥20% body-weight loss, severe systemic illness, deep ulceration >1 cm
2 or secondary infection, or inability to access food/water) were monitored daily; no animal reached these criteria during the study.
2.3. UVB Irradiation Protocol (In Vivo)
A bank of three UVB fluorescent lamps (TL 40W/12 RS SLV/25, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; peak emission at 312 nm) was positioned 30 cm above the dorsal surface of mice to provide uniform irradiation. UVB intensity was calibrated before each session using a UV radiometer (UV-B probe, Photoelectric Instrument Factory of Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China) at a constant irradiance of 0.225 mW/cm
2. The escalating dosimetry schedule, adapted from established murine photoaging protocols [
34], was initiated at 1 minimal erythemal dose (MED; 1 MED = 100 mJ/cm
2) and increased by 1 MED per week to a maintenance dose of 4 MED (400 mJ/cm
2), which was sustained for the remainder of the study. Irradiation was administered three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) for 10 consecutive weeks. Non-irradiated control mice were handled identically without UVB exposure to control for handling stress.
2.4. Topical Formulation, Microneedle-Assisted Transdermal Delivery, and Treatment Groups (In Vivo)
After acclimatization, mice were randomly assigned (using a random-number generator) into six groups (
n = 6 per group): control (CK; blank vehicle + sham irradiation); UVB model (M; blank vehicle + UVB); positive control (ATRA; 0.05%
w/
w all-trans retinoic acid + UVB) [
34]; low-dose AKG (LAKG; 1%
w/
w AKG + UVB); medium-dose AKG (MAKG; 2%
w/
w AKG + UVB); and high-dose AKG (HAKG; 3%
w/
w AKG + UVB).
The topical vehicle consisted of 40% (
w/
w) propylene glycol, 30% (
w/
w) polyethylene glycol 400, and 30% (
w/
w) deionized water, adapted from previously validated topical formulations for hairless mouse photoaging studies [
35,
36,
37]. AKG was first dissolved in the deionized water phase at the corresponding concentration (1%, 2%, or 3%
w/
w), and the pH was adjusted to 7.2–7.4 using 1 M NaOH to neutralize the dicarboxylate groups of AKG. ATRA formulations were prepared by first dissolving ATRA in propylene glycol (protected from light) before sequential addition of polyethylene glycol 400 and the aqueous phase. All formulations were freshly prepared weekly and stored at 4 °C, protected from light in amber glass containers.
Microneedle-Assisted Transdermal Delivery Protocol. To enhance cutaneous penetration of the hydrophilic AKG molecule and to standardize delivery conditions across groups, a microneedle-assisted transdermal delivery protocol was applied uniformly to all six experimental groups, with the only between-group difference being the composition of the topically applied formulation. This design ensured that any procedure-related effect of microneedle rolling on epidermal regeneration, collagen deposition, or inflammatory signaling was equally distributed across all groups and therefore controlled for in between-group comparisons. Approximately 30 min before each UVB irradiation session, mice were gently restrained without anesthesia, and 100 μL of the appropriate formulation was uniformly applied to the dorsal skin (~6 cm
2) using a calibrated micropipette. Immediately following formulation application, a sterile titanium-alloy microneedle dermal roller (Hauros, specifications in
Section 2.1) was applied with light, uniform pressure and rolled 10 times in each of four directions (40 passes total) to generate transient epidermal microchannels; adequate microchannel formation was confirmed by fine, evenly distributed pinpoint erythema without macroscopic bleeding. Before use, each roller was sterilized in 75% ethanol for 30 min and air-dried in a laminar flow hood; a new, unused sterile roller was used for each animal at each session, and used rollers were discarded after each session. The procedure was performed three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) throughout the 10-week study period.
Body weight was recorded weekly. Macroscopic dorsal skin photographs were captured weekly under standardized lighting using a digital camera (Canon EOS series). Skin appearance was inspected daily; transient pinpoint erythema typically resolved within hours of microneedle application, and no sustained adverse events were observed in any group. All investigators performing measurements and scoring were blinded to the group assignments.
2.5. Skin Biophysical Measurements
At the end of the 10-week experimental period and 24 h after the final UVB exposure, non-invasive skin biophysical parameters were measured on the dorsal skin of anesthetized mice (isoflurane inhalation) using a multi-probe adapter system (MPA, Courage + Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) in a temperature- and humidity-controlled room. Parameters assessed included transepidermal water loss (TEWL, Tewameter® TM 300), stratum corneum hydration (Corneometer® CM 825), sebum content (Sebumeter® SM 815), skin elasticity (Cutometer® MPA 580), skin anisotropy (Reviscometer® RVM 600), and erythema index (Mexameter® MX 18), all of which were obtained from Courage + Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany. Each parameter was measured at three randomized sites per mouse and averaged by a single blinded operator.
2.6. Macroscopic Skin Scoring
Photoaging severity was evaluated weekly using a semi-quantitative 0–6 scoring system [
38,
39] by two independent blinded observers, assessing erythema severity (0–2), scaling/dryness (0–2), and wrinkling (0–2). Inter-observer agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.85) was confirmed before analysis.
2.7. Histological Analysis
Following euthanasia by exsanguination under deep isoflurane anesthesia, dorsal skin samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, processed through graded ethanol and xylene, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned at 5 μm using a rotary microtome (Leica RM2235). Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Servicebio, #G1004 and #G1001) for epidermal/dermal thickness measurement, Masson’s trichrome (Servicebio, #G1006) for collagen volume fraction quantification, and Verhoeff–Van Gieson (Servicebio, #G1042) for elastic fiber density assessment, all performed according to the manufacturers’ protocols. Quantitative morphometric analyses were performed in five randomly selected high-power fields (×400) per section using ImageJ software (version 1.54j; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) by observers blinded to group assignments.
2.8. Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining
Deparaffinized sections underwent heat-induced antigen retrieval in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0), endogenous peroxidase quenching with 3% H2O2, and blocking with 5% normal goat serum (Beyotime, #C0265). Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against Ki67 (Proteintech, #27309-1-AP, 1:500) or p63 (Proteintech, #12143-1-AP, 1:200), followed by biotinylated secondary antibody and streptavidin-HRP (SP-9001, ZSGB-BIO), and visualized with DAB substrate (ZSGB-BIO, #ZLI-9018). Negative controls were processed with primary antibody omission. Ki67-positive basal cells and p63-positive epidermal cells were quantified in five high-power fields (×400) per section by two blinded observers.
2.9. RNA Sequencing (RNA-seq) and Bioinformatic Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from dorsal skin tissues (CK, UVB, and HAKG groups; n = 3 per group) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, #15596018), and only samples with RNA Integrity Number (RIN) ≥ 7.0 (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used for library construction with the NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA, #E7530). Paired-end sequencing (150 bp) was performed on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Novogene, Beijing, China). Clean reads (after FastQC v0.11.9 quality control and Trimmomatic v0.39 trimming) were aligned to the mouse reference genome (GRCm39/mm39) using HISAT2 (v2.2.1), and gene-level counts were obtained with featureCounts (Subread v2.0.3) using Ensembl annotation (release 108). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using DESeq2 (v1.34.0) with the criteria |log2FC| > 1 and FDR < 0.05 (Benjamini–Hochberg correction). GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed using clusterProfiler (v4.2.0); GSEA was conducted using GSEA software (v4.2.3) against MSigDB Hallmark and KEGG collections, with NES > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05 considered significant. RNA-seq data have been deposited in the National Genomic Data Center (accession PRJCA063446).
2.10. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Skin Tissue
Frozen dorsal skin tissues were homogenized in ice-cold PBS (10% w/v), and supernatants (12,000× g, 15 min, 4 °C) were assayed for superoxide dismutase (SOD, #A001-3-2; xanthine oxidase/hydroxylamine method), catalase (CAT, #A007-1-1; ammonium molybdate method), and malondialdehyde (MDA, #A003-1-2; thiobarbituric acid method) using commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) per manufacturers’ instructions. Activities were normalized to total protein concentration (BCA assay).
2.11. Cell Culture and UVB Irradiation
The human immortalized keratinocyte cell line HaCaT was obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), authenticated by short tandem repeat (STR) profiling, and verified mycoplasma-negative. Cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum(Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin(Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C in 5% CO2, and used between passages 3 and 15.
For UVB irradiation, the culture medium was replaced with a thin layer of PBS, and cells were exposed to a single dose of 30 mJ/cm
2 UVB (TL 20W/12 RS SLV lamp, Philips; peak emission 312 nm), selected based on dose–response experiments yielding approximately 70% viability (
Supplementary Figure S1A) [
10,
40]. Immediately after irradiation, PBS was replaced with fresh complete medium containing the indicated treatments. Sham-irradiated controls underwent identical medium replacement without UVB exposure.
2.12. Drug Treatments (In Vitro)
AKG was dissolved in complete culture medium (pH 7.2–7.4) and used at 4 mM, the optimal protective concentration determined by parallel CCK-8 dose–response and rescue experiments (
Supplementary Figure S1B,C). DMOG (1 mM, dissolved in DMSO) [
25] and compound C (10 μM, dissolved in DMSO) were used as competitive α-KGDD and AMPK inhibitors, respectively. MitoTEMPO (10 μM) and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC, 5 mM) were used as mitochondria-targeted and non-selective antioxidant comparators [
15]. The final DMSO concentration in all treatment groups did not exceed 0.1% (
v/
v), with equivalent DMSO added to all controls as vehicle. Cytotoxicity controls confirming the absence of independent toxicity at the working concentrations of DMOG and compound C are shown in
Supplementary Figure S1D.
Pharmacological inhibitors (DMOG or compound C) were pre-incubated with cells for 1 h prior to UVB irradiation. AKG and antioxidant comparators were administered immediately after UVB exposure in fresh medium. Cells were harvested at 24 h post-irradiation for protein extraction or fluorescence imaging, unless otherwise indicated. Detailed experimental groupings for each functional assay are described in the corresponding Results sections.
2.13. Cell Viability Assay (CCK-8)
HaCaT cells (8 × 103 cells/well in 96-well plates) were treated as indicated and assessed for viability using Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) per the manufacturer’s instructions, with absorbance read at 450 nm (SpectraMax i3x, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Each condition was performed in six replicate wells across three independent experiments.
2.14. Mitochondrial and Redox Imaging Assays
Total intracellular ROS (DCFH-DA, 10 μM, 30 min), mitochondrial superoxide (MitoSOX™ Red, 5 μM, 10 min), and mitochondrial membrane potential (JC-1, Beyotime #C2003S, 10 μg/mL, 20 min) were detected in HaCaT cells per the manufacturer’s protocols. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (Beyotime #C1022, 10 μg/mL). Fluorescence images were captured with an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX73; excitation/emission: 488/525 nm for DCFH-DA, 510/580 nm for MitoSOX, 514/529 nm for JC-1 monomer, 585/590 nm for JC-1 aggregates, 350/461 nm for Hoechst). Mean fluorescence intensity, normalized to nuclei count, was quantified across at least five random fields per condition using ImageJ. The selectivity index (SI) for compartmental ROS suppression was calculated as: SI = (% MitoSOX reduction vs. UVB)/(% DCFH-DA reduction vs. UVB), with statistical comparison against the non-selective baseline (SI = 1.0) by one-sample t-test.
Intracellular ATP was measured using the Enhanced ATP Assay Kit (Beyotime #S0027) based on a firefly luciferase–luciferin bioluminescence reaction. HaCaT cells (3 × 105/well in 6-well plates) were lysed in ATP lysis buffer; supernatants were combined with detection reagent and luminescence was measured on a SpectraMax i3x microplate reader. ATP concentrations were calculated from a standard curve (0.01–10 μM), normalized to total protein (BCA), and expressed as a percentage of CK.
2.15. Western Blotting
Cell or skin tissue lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails. Equal amounts of protein (20–40 μg) determined by BCA assay were resolved by 8–12% SDS-PAGE, transferred to 0.22 or 0.45 μm PVDF membranes, and blocked with 5% non-fat milk (or 5% BSA for phospho-specific antibodies) in TBST. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies listed in
Section 2.1, followed by the corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Proteintech, 1:10,000). Bands were visualized with ECL substrate (Millipore #WBKLS0500) on a Tanon 5200 imaging system and quantified by ImageJ; phosphorylated proteins were normalized to their corresponding total protein, and total proteins to GAPDH. All experiments were performed with at least three biologically independent replicates.
2.16. Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM (in vivo experiments) or mean ± SD (in vitro experiments), with biological replicate numbers (n) indicated in figure legends. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v9.5.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Normality and homogeneity of variance were assessed by Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. Multi-group comparisons used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (or Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 for unequal variances). Paired t-tests were applied for within-group compartmental comparisons (cytosolic vs. mitochondrial ROS), and one-sample t-tests for selectivity index comparisons against the non-selective baseline (SI = 1.0). A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered significant. Significance is denoted as: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. CK; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. UVB; + p < 0.05, ++ p < 0.01, +++ p < 0.001 between specified groups. All microscopy-based quantification was performed by observers blinded to group assignments.
4. Discussion
The present study identifies AKG as a metabolite-based regulator of mitochondrial redox homeostasis in UVB-induced photoaging, acting through an α-KGDD/HIF-1α–AMPK–PGC-1α/TFAM axis. Rather than scavenging radicals chemically, AKG functions as a co-substrate that restores the cell’s own mitochondrial quality-control machinery. We interpret the findings in the order in which the study progressed.
At the tissue level, microneedle-assisted topical AKG conferred dose-dependent protection against UVB photoaging in SKH1 hairless mice, preserving barrier function, epidermal–dermal architecture, and collagen/elastic-fibre organization, with high-dose AKG approaching the efficacy of the retinoid standard ATRA. AKG therefore joins the small group of metabolite-based interventions able to match retinoid-level structural protection [
5,
6], while its identity as an endogenous TCA-cycle metabolite suggests a potentially more favourable tolerability profile than retinoids [
19,
26,
27,
28,
29] that remains to be demonstrated directly.
To define the molecular basis of this protection, skin transcriptomics with gene-set enrichment pointed away from a generic cytosolic antioxidant response and toward mitochondrial oxidative-stress and energy-/oxygen-sensing signatures, identifying the AMPK and HIF-1 pathways as central AKG-responsive cascades alongside suppression of inflammatory programs. This unbiased convergence on mitochondrial and HIF/AMPK-related processes shaped the mechanistic hypothesis tested in vitro and aligns with the view that mitochondrial ROS, rather than generalized oxidative stress, is the dominant pathogenic species in UVB photoaging [
8,
9,
10,
11].
Because keratinocytes are the principal epidermal target of UVB and the main site of the identified signatures, we used the HaCaT keratinocyte line to dissect the mechanism under defined conditions, enabling the pharmacological interrogation (DMOG, compound C, MitoTEMPO) that is not feasible in vivo.
In HaCaT cells, AKG attenuated mitochondrial superoxide signals more than total cellular ROS, in contrast to the near-neutral compartmental profile of NAC. This offers a mechanistic explanation for the historically modest efficacy of non-selective antioxidants in photoprotection [
41,
42] and indicates that engaging endogenous metabolic signaling can approach the compartmental selectivity of an engineered mitochondrial antioxidant (MitoTEMPO [
15]) without lipophilic targeting chemistry. The selectivity index reported here is an operational, probe-based comparison rather than a stoichiometric measurement.
A central contribution of this work is the direct demonstration that UVB suppresses, and AKG restores, PHD enzymatic activity—a step previously inferred from HIF-1α protein levels alone [
10,
24,
25]. Because UVB-derived mitochondrial ROS oxidize the active-site Fe(II) [
25] while accumulating TCA intermediates such as succinate and fumarate compete with AKG [
24,
43], PHD inactivation reflects both oxidative inhibition and co-substrate limitation; AKG addresses both, whereas MitoTEMPO relieves only the oxidative component, explaining the greater PHD recovery achieved by AKG. The VHL-dependent prolyl-hydroxylation arm that targets HIF-1α for degradation is well established [
22,
23,
40].
In our model, HIF-1α excess (UVB or DMOG) consistently coincided with low AMPK Thr172 phosphorylation, and HIF-1α clearance by AKG with its restoration, while LKB1 remained constant—indicating that AMPK suppression arises downstream of the constitutive upstream kinase rather than from its loss. We did not, however, demonstrate that HIF-1α directly inhibits AMPK; although HIF-1α stabilization reprograms mitochondrial metabolism in ways that could lower AMPK activity [
30,
31], a direct effect has not been established and remains to be tested by genetic and phosphoproteomic approaches. We therefore present this step as a proposed, associative link.
These findings also carry implications for mTORC1, a reciprocal node of the energy-sensing network. Activated AMPK restrains mTORC1 through TSC2 and Raptor phosphorylation [
16,
44] and, independently of AMPK, AKG inhibits TOR signaling [
45]; because UVB activates mTOR in skin and mTOR inhibition mitigates UVB damage [
46], AKG-driven AMPK reactivation would be predicted to lower mTORC1 activity, consistent with the reduced epidermal hyperplasia observed here. mTORC1 activity was not measured directly and warrants future study.
Impaired degradation is unlikely to be the sole route to HIF-1α accumulation. DEC1 (BHLHE40) is a required upstream mediator of UVB-induced HIF-1α in keratinocytes via an EGFR/PI3K/AKT/DEC1 axis [
47]; UVB-induced HIF-1α thus likely reflects both increased DEC1-dependent input and decreased PHD-dependent clearance, with AKG acting predominantly on the latter. Whether AKG also modulates DEC1 warrants future study.
Collectively, AKG is positioned mechanistically apart from both non-selective scavengers (NAC) and engineered mitochondrial antioxidants (MitoTEMPO): rather than neutralizing radicals already formed, it restores the upstream enzymatic and biogenic capacity that limits their production [
11,
16]. Pharmacological blockade at either α-KGDD (DMOG) or AMPK (compound C) largely abrogated AKG’s protection across mitochondrial superoxide, membrane potential, and ATP, supporting a single upstream architecture rather than parallel independent effects. Relative to ATRA, high-dose AKG achieved comparable structural protection through a distinct, non-RAR mechanism (
Figure 8).
Several considerations temper translational interpretation. The microneedle-assisted protocol is itself biologically active, and the thrice-weekly, 10-week regimen does not represent a realistic human-use pattern; cutaneous and intracellular AKG were not directly quantified, and no formal tolerability assessment was performed. With the exception of the mitochondrial functional assays and PHD activity, the AKG-alone arm was not tested across the molecular targets; although AKG alone did not differ from control in those assays, its systematic inclusion for each endpoint would more firmly establish that AKG acts by reversing UVB-induced dysregulation rather than by shifting the basal state. Mechanistically, we relied on pharmacological rather than genetic manipulation (noting that compound C has AMPK-independent effects [
48], partially mitigated by our UVB + compound C control); validation in primary and three-dimensional skin models, direct measurement of intracellular AKG, and assessment of other α-KGDD substrates such as TET and Jumonji-domain demethylases [
21,
49] remain for future work. Mitochondrial biogenesis was inferred from PGC-1α/TFAM together with ΔΨm, ATP, and mtROS rather than from mtDNA copy number or respirometry, and canonical senescence/MMP panels were not assessed. Finally, the chronic 4-MED regimen produced focal superficial erosions in some animals, indicating a combined photoaging/sub-acute-photodamage phenotype that milder regimens may better isolate. Clinical studies in human subjects will be necessary before translation.