Next Article in Journal
Phyllobilins: Emerging Bioactive Chlorophyll Metabolites and Their Potential Impact on Human Health
Previous Article in Journal
Mega-Events, Air Pollution and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Early-Life Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling as a Target for Cardiovascular–Kidney–Metabolic Syndrome Reprogramming
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thiourea-Based H2S-Releasing Pramipexole Hybrids as Neuroprotective Agents

1
Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via D. Montesano, 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56125 Pisa, Italy
3
Department for Life Quality Studies, Alma Mater Studiorum—Università di Bologna, Corso d’Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy
4
Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via Panzini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2026, 15(5), 628; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15050628 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 13 March 2026 / Revised: 9 May 2026 / Accepted: 11 May 2026 / Published: 15 May 2026

Abstract

Multitarget hybrid molecules are a promising strategy for treating complex neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), where dopaminergic dysfunction, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and cellular senescence coexist and drive disease progression. Here, we developed pramipexole-derived hydrogen sulfide (H2S)-releasing hybrids using, for the first time, a thiourea moiety as an H2S-donating linker to extend the therapeutic profile of pramipexole beyond dopamine receptor agonism. The hybrids were synthesized and characterized, and their H2S-releasing properties were assessed by amperometric and intracellular detection assays. Among the series, compound 2e (PRAM-ADA) showed the most efficient and sustained H2S release, indicating a favorable thiol-dependent release profile. PRAM-ADA was further evaluated for antioxidant and anti-senescent activities in BV2 microglial cells, as well as for chemical and enzymatic stability under simulated physiological conditions. The hybrid significantly reduced LPS-induced reactive oxygen species accumulation and attenuated oxidative stress–induced cellular senescence, demonstrating a superior cytoprotective profile compared with pramipexole. These findings support the concept that combining dopaminergic activity with controlled H2S donation enhances antioxidant and anti-senescent responses, indicating their potential as multitarget agents with neuroprotective properties relevant to neurodegenerative disorders, including PD.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic and progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, leading to striatal dopamine depletion and consequent impairment of motor function. Clinically, PD manifests with cardinal motor symptoms, including bradykinesia, resting tremor, rigidity, and postural instability, alongside a wide range of non-motor disturbances such as cognitive decline, depression, sleep disorders, and autonomic dysfunction, all of which significantly impact patients’ quality of life [1,2]. Although current pharmacological treatments, particularly dopamine replacement therapies, effectively alleviate symptoms, they do not halt disease progression and are frequently associated with long-term complications such as motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. This limitation underscores the urgent need for disease-modifying strategies capable of addressing the complex pathophysiology of PD [3].
Accumulating evidence indicates that PD is a multifactorial disorder driven by the interplay of several pathogenic mechanisms, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, impaired proteostasis, and glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity, all contributing to progressive neuronal loss [4,5]. The convergence of these processes suggests that targeting a single pathway may be insufficient, thereby supporting the development of multitarget-directed ligands (MTDLs) as a promising therapeutic strategy to simultaneously modulate multiple disease-relevant pathways within a single molecular framework.
In this context, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has emerged as a key endogenous signaling molecule with significant neuroprotective potential. In PD, dysregulation of redox balance, mitochondrial impairment, and chronic neuroinflammation represent central drivers of dopaminergic neurodegeneration, and H2S has been shown to modulate all these processes. Specifically, H2S contributes to the maintenance of redox homeostasis, supports mitochondrial bioenergetics, regulates protein function through sulfhydration, and suppresses pro-inflammatory signaling cascades [6,7,8]. Consistent with these mechanisms, preclinical studies have demonstrated that H2S donors can protect dopaminergic neurons and improve motor outcomes in experimental models of PD [9,10].
Despite these promising findings, the therapeutic translation of H2S-based strategies in PD remains limited. Multifunctional compounds capable of combining H2S-releasing properties with established pharmacological mechanisms targeting dopaminergic dysfunction and other disease-relevant pathways remain scarce. This gap highlights the need for novel molecular entities that integrate H2S donation within a multitarget framework specifically tailored to PD pathology.
Among H2S-releasing compounds, isothiocyanates (ITCs) represent an attractive class due to their dual role as bioactive molecules and H2S donors. Naturally occurring ITCs, such as sulforaphane, allyl isothiocyanate, benzyl isothiocyanate, and phenethyl isothiocyanate, derived from glucosinolates found in cruciferous vegetables, have demonstrated antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective effects [11,12,13]. These activities are largely mediated through activation of the Nrf2/ARE pathway, inhibition of NF-κB signaling, and modulation of apoptotic processes, all of which are highly relevant to PD pathogenesis [8,14]. In parallel, synthetic ITCs have been developed to achieve improved control over H2S release and pharmacokinetic properties [15,16], and ITC-based derivatives of clinically used drugs, such as memantine and rivastigmine, have shown promising results in neurodegenerative models [17,18], further supporting the applicability of this approach within an MTDL framework.
Based on these considerations, we designed and synthesized a novel class of hybrid molecules combining dopaminergic activity with H2S-releasing capability. In particular, we selected pramipexole as the core scaffold due to its well-established role as a selective dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist used in the treatment of PD [19]. The rationale was to integrate the symptomatic efficacy of dopaminergic stimulation with the disease-modifying potential of H2S donation. To this end, a series of pramipexole-based hybrids (compounds 2ae, Scheme 1) was developed using different design strategies.
In the first approach, the terminal amine of pramipexole was converted into an isothiocyanate group to obtain compound 2a. In a second-generation design, the pramipexole scaffold was conjugated with natural and synthetic ITCs via a thiourea-based linker (compounds 2be). Notably, this linker is known to exhibit intrinsic H2S-releasing properties [20,21] and is employed here for the first time as a functional H2S-donating element within multitarget hybrid molecules, thereby providing an additional and integrated source of H2S release. The natural allyl, benzyl, and phenethyl isothiocyanates were selected on the basis of their established biological activity.
Finally, to further expand the multitarget profile, compound 2e was designed by incorporating a synthetic ITC derived from amantadine, an NMDA receptor antagonist clinically used in PD for its anti-glutamatergic and anti-dyskinetic effects [22]. This advanced hybrid strategy enables the simultaneous modulation of dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission alongside H2S-mediated cytoprotective mechanisms, thus addressing multiple aspects of PD pathology within a single molecular entity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis and Chemical-Physical Characterization of Novel Compounds

Novel multitarget thioureas were prepared starting from commercially available (S)-2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(propylamino)benzothiazole dihydrochloride, namely pramipexole (1). The synthetic strategy for the preparation of the compounds described here is depicted in Scheme 1.
In particular, the pramipexole isothiocyanate (1a) was synthesized in the presence of 3 eq of Na2CO3 in acetone.
The pramipexole derivatives 1be were obtained through the reaction of the primary amine group of pramipexole with specific isothiocyanate reagents. In each case, the two components were directly connected via a thiourea functional group. The reactions were carried out in a microwave oven (DISCOVER 2.0, CEM, Matthews, NC, USA) specifically designed for organic synthesis. Reagents and solvents were placed in a sealed reactor suitable for high-pressure reactions. The synthetic procedure followed a microwave program that included appropriate ramping and holding steps, with the temperature of the stirred reaction mixture monitored using an iWave Sensor (Matthews, NC, USA).
The compounds (1ae) were then converted into their corresponding hydrochloride salts (2ae), by treatment with diethyl ether saturated with hydrogen chloride gas.
Solutions were concentrated under reduced pressure using a Buchi R-114 rotary evaporator (Buchi Italia S.r.l. Milano, Italy). All reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on Merck silica gel 60 F254 (Merk Life Science S.r.l., Milano, Italy) plates, which include a fluorescent indicator. Visualization was achieved under UV light at 254 nm. Preparative chromatographic purifications were performed using silica gel columns (Kieselgel 60, Merk Life Science S.r.l., Milano, Italy). All synthesized compounds were fully characterized by melting point determination, mass spectrometry, and NMR spectroscopy. Melting points were measured with a Buchi Melting Point B-540 apparatus (Buchi Italia S.r.l. Milano, Italy) and obtained from recrystallized or chromatographically purified samples.
Mass spectra of the final products were acquired using an LTQ Orbitrap XL™ Fourier transform mass spectrometer (FTMS) (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA), equipped with an ESI ION MAX™M source (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA) operating in positive ion mode.
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz using a Bruker Avance Neo TwoBay spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), in appropriate deuterated solvents.
Scheme 1. (i) Thiophosgene, Na2CO3, acetone, 0 °C; (ii) R-NCS, dry acetone, 70 °C, MW; (iii) anhydrous DCM, HCl solution (2.0 M in diethyl ether).
Scheme 1. (i) Thiophosgene, Na2CO3, acetone, 0 °C; (ii) R-NCS, dry acetone, 70 °C, MW; (iii) anhydrous DCM, HCl solution (2.0 M in diethyl ether).
Antioxidants 15 00628 sch001

2.2. Amperometric H2S Releasing Properties

The H2S-releasing properties of the synthesized pramipexole-based hybrid compounds were assessed using an amperometric method, which enables real-time detection of H2S with high sensitivity and selectivity. The experiments were carried out at room temperature using an Apollo-4000 Free Radical Analyzer (WPI, Sarasota, FL, USA) equipped with H2S-selective mini-electrodes.
A 10× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) stock solution was prepared (NaH2PO4·H2O 1.28 g, Na2HPO4·12H2O 5.97 g, NaCl 43.88 g in 500 mL of distilled water) and stored at 4 °C. Before each experiment, the buffer was diluted 1:10 with distilled water to obtain the assay buffer (AB), and the pH was adjusted to 7.4.
The mini electrode was first equilibrated in 2 mL of AB until a stable baseline was achieved. Each test compound was dissolved in DMSO and added directly to the AB to reach a final concentration of 1 mM (DMSO 1%). The tested compounds included 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, and 2e.
The assay was performed both in the absence and in the presence of L-cysteine (4 mM), whose thiol group mimics intracellular free thiols. In the latter condition, L-cysteine was added to the AB immediately before compound addition to better reflect physiologically relevant environments.
H2S release was continuously monitored for 30 min, and the corresponding amperometric signals (pA) were recorded. Calibration curves were generated using known concentrations of NaHS (1, 3, 5, and 10 μM) in acid buffer (pH 4.0) to convert current readings into H2S concentrations (μM). The resulting H2S concentrations were plotted over time to evaluate and compare the H2S-releasing behavior of each compound.

2.3. In Vitro Evaluation

2.3.1. Cell Culture

BV-2 murine microglial immortalized cells (Cytion, Heidelberg, Germany) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (R0883, Sigma-Aldrich®, now Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin–streptomycin solution (100 U/mL and 100 µg/mL, respectively; all from Sigma-Aldrich®). Cells were grown in T-75 flasks at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere until they reached approximately 90–95% confluence before starting the experiments and were used up to passage 20.

2.3.2. Measurement of Intracellular H2S Release in Murine Microglial Cells

BV-2 cells were seeded at a density of 72,000 cells per well in a black 96-well plate. After 24 h, the culture medium was replaced with 180 µL per well of a freshly prepared WSP-1 working solution (Washington State Probe-1, 3-methoxy-3-oxo-3H-spiro[isobenzofuran-1,9-xanthen]-6-yl-2(pyridin-2-yldisulfanyl)benzoate; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) at a final concentration of 100 µM. WSP-1 is a highly specific fluorescent probe for the detection of H2S, which undergoes cyclization upon reaction with intracellular H2S, leading to the release of a fluorophore (benzodithiolone) with λ ex/em = 476/516 nm.
Cells were incubated with the WSP-1 working solution for 30 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2, protected from light, to allow intracellular uptake of the dye. In parallel, wells without cells (“blank” wells) were filled with the same WSP-1 solution and treated with identical conditions to evaluate potential background fluorescence.
After incubation, the WSP-1 solution was removed and replaced with 180 µL of standard assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 2 mM KCl, 120 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 5 mM glucose, 2 mM CaCl2·2H2O, pH 7.4).
A basal fluorescence reading was then recorded using a multimode plate reader (EnSpire®, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), reflecting endogenous intracellular H2S levels.
Then, BV-2 cells were treated in triplicate with 20 µL of H2S donor compounds at final concentrations of 300 µM and 100 µM. Cells were also exposed to the vehicle (DMSO 1%), and to diallyl disulfide (DADS; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) 100 µM, used as a positive control due to its known properties as a slow-releasing H2S donor [23].
Fluorescence increase (Fluorescence Index, FI), resulting from the reaction between WSP-1 and H2S released by the donor compounds, was monitored for 60 min by acquiring fluorescence measurements every 5 min.
Furthermore, the safety profile of the compounds was evaluated as reported in Supporting Information (Figure S1).
For data analysis, background fluorescence from blank wells was subtracted from the corresponding values in treated wells. The resulting time-course fluorescence data were then used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC).

2.3.3. Antioxidant Effect in an LPS-Induced BV-2 Model

The antioxidant effect of the pramipexole hydrochloride derivative 2e was evaluated in comparison with pramipexole hydrochloride (1) by assessing intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS levels were quantified using the Muse® Oxidative Stress Kit (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. This assay enables the identification and quantification of ROS (+) cells by detecting superoxide anions via a fluorescence-based method, using the minicytofluorometer Muse® Cell Analyzer (Luminex Corporation).
BV-2 murine microglial cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. After incubation, the medium was replaced with 980 µL of fresh RPMI and cells were then pre-treated with 2e (0.3 and 1 µM) or 1 (0.3 and 1 µM). All compounds were solubilized in DMSO and diluted in culture medium to obtain a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. After 1 h of incubation, LPS 10 µg/mL was added for 24 h to induce oxidative stress.
Then, cells were detached using a scraper, centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 5 min, and the pellets were resuspended in 500 µL of 1× Assay Buffer (Muse® Oxidative Stress Kit), adjusting the final cell density to 1 × 106–1 × 107 cells/mL as recommended by the manufacturer.
The Muse® Oxidative Stress Reagent was diluted 1:100 in 1× Assay Buffer to obtain the intermediate solution, which was further diluted 1:80 to prepare the working solution. A 10 µL aliquot of the cell suspension was mixed with 190 µL of working solution, gently vortexed for 3–5 s, and incubated at 37 °C in the dark for 30 min. Samples were then briefly mixed again and analyzed using the Muse® Cell Analyzer (Luminex).
The assay distinguishes ROS-negative [ROS (−)] cells from ROS-positive [ROS (+)] cells (oxidatively stressed cells). Results were expressed as the percentage of ROS (+) and ROS (−) cells within the total population. At the end of the experimental procedure, cell viability was also assessed (Supporting Information, Figure S2).

2.3.4. Evaluation of Anti-Senescence Effect in BV-2 Cells

To establish an in vitro model of microglial senescence, BV-2 murine microglial cells were exposed to oxidative stress induced by H2O2. Senescence was assessed by detecting senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) activity, a lysosomal enzyme widely used as a biomarker of cellular senescence due to its elevated expression in senescent cells.
BV-2 cells were seeded in 6-well plates (75,000 cells/well) pre-coated with 1% gelatin and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Gelatin coating was applied to improve BV2 cell adherence, in order to prevent cell detachment and ensure maintenance of a stable monolayer throughout the procedures. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with 900 µL of fresh medium. Oxidative stress was induced by adding 100 µL of H2O2 to reach final concentrations of 50, 100, or 200 µM. Control wells received 100 µL of medium without H2O2. After 3 h, the medium was replaced with 2 mL of complete medium, and cells were incubated for 72 h.
Before staining, the citrate/phosphate buffer was prepared (Na2HPO4 756 mg, C6H8O7 1720 mg in 200 mL of bidistilled water) and stored at 4 °C. On the day of the experiment, the pH of the citrate/phosphate buffer was adjusted to 5.6, and the staining solution was freshly prepared using this buffer (K3[Fe(CN)6] 5 mM, K4[Fe(CN)6]·3H2O 5 mM, MgCl2 2 mM, NaCl 150 mM in 10 mL of citrate/phosphate buffer). The G/F fixative (1.85% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in 1× PBS) was also freshly prepared on the same day.
Following 72 h of incubation, cells were fixed with 500 µL of freshly prepared G/F fixative for 5 min at room temperature. During fixation, the X-gal stock solution (50 mg/mL in DMSO) was added to the staining solution to reach a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. After fixation, cells were washed once with 1× PBS and incubated with 500 µL of the freshly prepared staining solution for 3 h at 37 °C on a temperature-controlled plate shaker in the dark. X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside) is a sensitive chromogenic substrate for β-galactosidase; upon hydrolysis by SA-β-gal, it produces an insoluble blue compound (5,5′-dibromo-4,4′-dichloro-indigo) that accumulates in senescent cells, enabling their visual identification [24].
After staining, the solution was removed, cells were washed with PBS, and 500 µL of isopropanol was added for 15 min to preserve staining. Bright-field images were acquired using a light microscope, capturing at least three representative fields per well. Quantification was performed in blinded analysis using ImageJ software (version 1.54, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). For each microscopic field, the percentage of blue-stained area (SA-β-gal positive) was determined in relation to the total area observed. At the end of the experimental procedure, cell viability was also assessed (Supporting Information, Figure S3).
The potential anti-senescent effect of the H2S-releasing pramipexole derivative 2e was evaluated in comparison with pramipexole hydrochloride (1). BV-2 cells were pre-treated with the compounds prior to oxidative stress induction by H2O2, following the senescence protocol described previously.
Cells were treated with 1 or 2e at final concentrations of 0.3 µM and 1 µM for 1 h. After incubation, oxidative stress was induced by adding 100 µL of H2O2 to reach a final concentration of 50 µM. Untreated cells served as negative controls, while cells treated with H2O2 alone were used as positive controls for senescence induction.
After 3 h of H2O2 exposure, the medium was replaced with fresh complete medium, and cells were incubated for 72 h. The subsequent steps, including fixation, SA-β-gal staining, and image acquisition, were carried out.

2.3.5. Data Analysis

One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test was used to compare the means of three or more treatment conditions, using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software). The results are reported as the mean ± SEM. p-value was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), or p < 0.0001 (****). Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated independently at least twice (n ≥ 6).

2.4. Chemical and Enzymatic Stability

The chemical and enzymatic stability of the tested compound was evaluated under different simulated physiological conditions. All experiments were performed at 37 ± 0.5 °C, and analyses were conducted in triplicate.

2.4.1. Stability in PBS and SGF

For chemical stability studies, a stock solution of tested compound (10 mM) was prepared in DMSO and diluted with the appropriate preheated buffer to obtain a final concentration of 100 µM, maintaining a final DMSO content below 1% (v/v). Stability at physiological pH was assessed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), while acidic stability was evaluated in simulated gastric fluid (SGF without pepsin, 2.0 g/L sodium chloride and 2.917 g/L HCl, pH 1.2). PBS buffer was prepared by dissolving one tablet of Phosphate Buffer Saline (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) in 100 mL of distilled water and adjusting pH if necessary. The resulting buffer contains 10 mM phosphate and 150 mM sodium chloride.
Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and at predetermined time points, aliquots were withdrawn and analyzed with RP-HPLC, using a validated analytical method. The percentage of intact compound was plotted as a function of time, and the half-life (t1/2) was calculated assuming first-order degradation kinetics.
For the calibration curves, standard solutions (r2 > 0.99) in PBS or SGF, over the concentration range of 0.2–250 μM, were used. HPLC analyses were performed as described below.

2.4.2. Stability in DMEM

Enzymatic stability was assessed by incubating the tested compound in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 1% L-glutamine, 1% Pen-Strep, 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). A solution of compound 2e (10 mM) in DMSO was added to the medium to a final concentration of 200 µM, and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C. At selected time points, 200 μL of each aliquot was collected and added to 200 μL of CH3CN containing 0.1% of TFA to deproteinize the medium. The samples were vortexed using a Velp ZX3 Vortex mixer (VELP, Usmate Velate, Italy) and then centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 rpm using Eppendorf Centrifuge 5425 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Each clear supernatant was collected and filtered by 0.45 μm PTFE filters (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). 20 μL aliquots were withdrawn and analyzed by RP-HPLC, as reported below. The experiment was performed in triplicate, and the percentage of intact compound was plotted as a function of time, and the half-life (t1/2) was calculated assuming first-order degradation kinetics.
For the calibration curves, standard solutions (r2 > 0.99) in CH3CN/water, over the concentration range of 0.2–250 μM, were used. HPLC analyses were performed as described below.

2.4.3. RP-HPLC Analysis

Quantitative analysis of 2e and 1, as the main metabolite, was performed using analytical RP-HPLC using Phenomenex Kinetex XB-C18 column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA, 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm). The column was connected to a Rheodyne model 7725 injector (Kyoto, Japan), a Shimadzu-10 ADsp HPLC system (Kyoto, Japan) and a Shimadzu SPD-20 A/SPD-20 AV UV-VIS detector (Kyoto, Japan). The mobile phase consisted of water 0.1% TFA (solvent A) and CH3CN 0.1% TFA (solvent B) at a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 20 µL, and gradient elution was employed from 30% to 100% solvent B over 15 min. The detection was carried out using a UV detector (Kyoto, Japan) set at 254 and 220 nm. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using standard chromatography software (Lab solutions LC, version 5.57 SP1, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Chemical-Physical Characterization of Novel Compounds

3.1.1. (S)-2-Isothiocyanato-N-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazol-6-amine Hydrochloride Salt (2a)

The mixture of (S)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazole-2,6-diamine (1, 500 mg, 3.4 mmol) and Na2CO3 (370 mg, 3.5 mmol) in acetone was placed in an ice-bath and thiophosgene (272 μL, 3.5 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was kept at 0 °C for an hour and then at room temperature for an hour. The precipitated solid was filtered, and the solvent evaporated by distillation at reduced pressure. The obtained residue was treated with water and extracted with dichloromethane. The organic phases were dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated. The crude product was purified on a silica gel column using DCM/MeOH 9.5:0.5 (v/v) as the eluent mixture. The collected fractions were dried by distillation and the residue was crystallized with n-hexane, obtaining an orange solid product (1a). The compound 1a was dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane and HCl solution (2.0 M in diethyl ether) was added at 0 °C for one hour. The solvent was removed by vacuum distillation and the residue recrystallised with diethyl ether, obtaining a pure yellow solid (2a). Yield 20%. m.p. 109.7–110.4 °C. ESI-HRMS (M + H)+ m/z 253.07 calcd. for C11H15N3S2; found 254.1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.96 (s, 1H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 3.89–3.82 (ddd, J = 13.5, 8.1, 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.48–3.41 (m, 1H) 2.84–2.80 (dd, J = 10.4, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.52–2.49 (m, 2H), 2.44–2.40 (m, 2H), 1.78–1.53 (m, 2H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 198.67, 170.38, 101.00, 70.23, 59.01, 48.29, 38.26, 26.19, 20.11, 11.65.

3.1.2. (S)-1-Allyl-3-(6-(propylamino)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)thiourea Hydrochloride Salt (2b)

A solution of (S)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazole-2,6-diamine (1, 200 mg, 0.946 mmol) in dry acetone (5 mL) was placed in a 10 mL closed reaction vessel and allylisothiocyanate (92 μL, 0.946 mmol) was added. The closed reaction vessel was placed in the cavity of a CEM microwave reactor, run under pressure and irradiated according to the following parameters: T, 70 °C; ramp time, 2 min; hold time, 10 min; pressure, 150 psi; power, 100 W. After cooling to 0 °C, the mixture was hydrolyzed with ice. The precipitate was washed with cold water and crude material was recrystallized with diethyl ether, providing a white solid product (1b). The obtained compound 1b was dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane and HCl solution (2.0 M in diethyl ether) was added at 0 °C for one hour. The solvent was removed by distillation at reduced pressure and the residue recrystallised with diethyl ether, obtaining a pure solid (2b). Yield 95%. m.p. 172.3–173.9 °C. ESI-HRMS (M + H)+ m/z 310.13 calcd. for C14H22N4S2; found 311.2. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 5.98 (ddd, J = 16.2, 10.9, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 5.72 (s, 1H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 5.23 (t, J = 14.9 Hz, 2H), 4.89 (s, 1H), 4.39 (m, 2H), 3.29 (m, 2H), 2.92 (dd, J = 15.0, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.63–2.54 (m, 1H), 2.18 (s, 1H), 2.06–2.03 (m, 1H), 2.00–1.87 (m, 1H), 1.75–1.65 (m, 2H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 181.66, 165.80, 144.69, 134.17, 117.02, 115.93, 56.97, 48.65, 46.28, 30.94, 27.49, 26.19, 22.64, 11.55.

3.1.3. (S)-1-Benzyl-3-(6-(propylamino)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)thiourea Hydrochloride Salt (2c)

The desired compound (2c) was prepared as described for 2b starting from (S)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazole-2,6-diamine (1, 200 mg, 0.946 mmol) and benzyl isothiocyanate (125 μL, 0.946 mmol). Yield 91%. m.p. 155.4–156.3 °C. ESI-HRMS (M + H)+ m/z 360.14 calcd. for C18H24N4S2; found 361.2. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.37 (s, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.32–7.26 (m, 4H), 7.21 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (s, 1H), 4.90–4.79 (qd, J = 15.4, 5.5 Hz, 2H), 2.74–2.53 (m, 4H), 2.52–2.49 (m, 2H), 2.04–1.93 (m, 2H), 1.92–1.88 (m, 1H), 1.66–1.49 (m, 2H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 181.65, 169.32, 140.44, 133.03, 128.49, 127.48, 126.86, 113.44, 55.97, 48.82, 25.83, 25.76, 23.20, 22.43, 11.47.

3.1.4. (S)-1-Phenethyl-3-(6-(propylamino)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)thiourea Hydrochloride Salt (2d)

The desired compound (2d) was prepared as described for 2b starting from (S)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazole-2,6-diamine (1, 200 mg, 0.946 mmol) and phenethyl isothiocyanate (141 μL, 0.946 mmol). Yield 93%. m.p. 125.4–126.9 °C. ESI-HRMS (M + H)+ m/z 374.16 calcd. for C19H26N4S2; found 375.2. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.36 (s, 1H), 7.55 (s, 1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (dd, J = 13.9, 7.1 Hz, 3H), 5.45 (s, 1H), 3.79–3.76 (m, 2H), 3.41–3.66 (m, 1H), 2.88 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.67–2.54 (m, 4H), 2.52–2.49 (m, 2H), 2.00–1.91 (m, 1H), 1.90–1.84 (m, 1H), 1.52–1.40 (m, 2H), 0.83 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 180.96, 169.32, 140.03, 133.03, 129.10, 128.82, 126.52, 113.46, 55.51, 47.28, 35.18, 25.79, 25.75, 23.20, 22.13, 11.48.

3.1.5. 1-((3R,5R,7R)-Adamantan-1-yl)-3-((S)-6-(propylamino)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)thiourea Hydrochloride Salt (2e - PRAM-ADA)

The desired compound (2e) was prepared as described for 2b starting from (S)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazole-2,6-diamine (1, 200 mg, 0.946 mmol) and 1-adamanthyl isothiocyanate (183 mg, 0.946 mmol). Yield 87%. m.p. 238.5–239.8 °C. ESI-HRMS (M + H)+ m/z 404.21 calcd. for C21H32N4S2; found 405.2. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.30 (s, 1H), 9.17 (s, 1H), 7.90 (s, 1H), 3.44 (s, 2H), 3.37–3.24 (m, 4H), 3.00 (dd, J = 15.6, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.90 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 2.72 (dd, J = 15.3, 9.1 Hz, 1H), 2.61–2.57 (m, 1H), 2.25–2.21 (m, 1H), 2.06 (s, 2H), 1.96 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 4H), 1.89 (ddd, J = 19.8, 11.4, 5.5 Hz, 2H), 1.73–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.62 (s, 4H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 179.56, 168.05, 139.80, 111.08, 59.23, 53.31, 46.37, 43.43, 35.23, 29.14, 25.58, 24.90, 23.19, 19.60, 11.55.

3.2. Amperometric H2S Releasing Properties

All pramipexole-based H2S-donor derivatives tested at 1 mM exhibited a time-dependent increase in H2S generation in the presence of L-cysteine, whereas negligible release was observed under cysteine-free conditions (Figure 1). The addition of L-cysteine markedly enhanced H2S production for all compounds, indicating a thiol-dependent activation mechanism. Under these conditions, most derivatives generated approximately 2 μM H2S, with compound 2b reaching ~4 μM. In contrast, H2S levels remained essentially unchanged over time in the absence of L-cysteine, confirming that spontaneous hydrolysis or degradation does not significantly contribute to H2S formation.
Notably, compound 2a displayed a distinct behavior compared to the other derivatives, releasing higher H2S levels both in the presence (~8 μM) and absence (~5 μM) of L-cysteine, suggesting a partial thiol-independent contribution to its H2S release. Overall, the concentration–time profiles obtained in the presence of L-cysteine were characterized by a progressive increase in H2S levels, further supporting the requirement of thiol availability to sustain efficient H2S donation for the majority of the tested compounds.

3.3. Measurement of Intracellular H2S Release in Murine Microglial Cells

The evaluation of intracellular H2S release using BV2 cells revealed differences among the pramipexole-based derivatives tested at 300 μM. As shown in the kinetic curves (Figure 2A), compound 2e displayed the most pronounced intracellular H2S increase during the time of incubation (60 min). Compounds 2a and 2d also elicited appreciable H2S accumulation, while the other derivatives produced moderate and not significant H2S release. When tested at 100 μM, none of the compounds induced appreciable intracellular H2S release.
The differences observed between the amperometric H2S measurements obtained in a cell-free system and those recorded in murine microglial cells primarily reflect the distinct nature of the experimental approaches rather than a divergence in donor behavior. The in vitro amperometric assay is designed to assess the intrinsic release kinetics of the compound in the presence of an excess of free thiols (obtained through the addition of L-cysteine), without biological interference. In contrast, measurements in microglial cells show H2S release within a complex intracellular environment, where the molecule is taken up and then releases H2S.
The AUC analysis (Figure 2B) further corroborated these findings. Compound 2e, hereafter referred to as PRAM-ADA, showed the highest cumulative intracellular H2S exposure, identifying it as the most efficient donor of the series. Notably, compounds 2a and 2d also generated substantially higher AUC values compared with the other derivatives.
The concentrations used for the tested compounds were selected considering their distinct chemical properties, including sulfur content and solubility, and the interpretation of the results needs to consider this choice. In particular, DADS, employed as a positive control, contains two sulfur atoms and is known to release H2S efficiently under the experimental conditions. In contrast, the tested compounds exhibit different structural features and H2S-releasing capacities, which may require higher concentrations to achieve measurable biological effects. Furthermore, differences in solubility and stability in the experimental medium necessitated the use of increased concentrations for some compounds. Thus, the reported responses reflect compound-dependent activity under optimized experimental conditions rather than a direct comparison of potency on an equimolar basis.

3.4. Antioxidant Effect in an LPS-Induced BV-2 Model

Microglial cells play a central role in the progression of Parkinson’s disease by acting as key mediators of neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Upon activation, microglia produce high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which contribute to dopaminergic neuronal dysfunction and degeneration [25]. Persistent microglial activation has been recognized as a major amplifier of neuronal injury in PD, linking neuroinflammation to oxidative damage within the nigrostriatal pathway. In this context, targeting microglial oxidative stress represents a complementary therapeutic strategy alongside dopaminergic modulation [26]. Notably, increasing evidence indicates that hydrogen sulfide (H2S) exerts regulatory effects on microglial function, attenuating activation and reducing the production of pro-inflammatory mediators and ROS [27]. H2S donors have been shown to suppress microglial activation and promote a shift toward a neuroprotective phenotype, thereby limiting inflammation-driven neuronal damage [28]. Therefore, the use of BV2 microglial cells in the present study is intended to evaluate the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant component of the hybrid compounds, while the pramipexole scaffold provides the dopaminergic pharmacological basis, supporting a dual-target strategy relevant to PD pathophysiology.
Thus, to investigate the potential protective properties of hybrid molecules combining dopaminergic activity with H2S-releasing features, an in vitro inflammatory model was employed for quantifying ROS levels through minicytofluorometric analysis, using LPS stimulation and BV-2 microglial cells. LPS treatment significantly increased the percentage of ROS-+ cells compared with vehicle. Treatment with PRAM-ADA hybrid compound, selected for further pharmacological evaluation based on its significant H2S-releasing properties, effectively attenuated ROS accumulation at both 0.3 and 1 μM, compared with vehicle. In contrast, the parent drug pramipexole (PRAM) did not produce a significant reduction in ROS at either concentration, highlighting that the antioxidant effect is due to the H2S-releasing modification (Figure 3). No decrease in cell viability was recorded (Supporting Information, Figure S2).

3.5. Evaluation of Anti-Senescence Effect in BV-2 Cells

The senescence model was established in BV2 microglial cells. Senescent microglial cells are characterized by a pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidant phenotype, commonly referred to as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which promotes the release of cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and other mediators capable of exacerbating neuronal damage. The accumulation of such dysfunctional microglia has been implicated in amplifying chronic neuroinflammation and the progression of dopaminergic neurodegeneration. To establish and validate the oxidative stress–induced senescence model, cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of H2O2 (50, 100, and 200 μM) and senescence was evaluated by β-galactosidase staining (Figure 4). H2O2 50 and 100 μM induced significant senescence, with the highest level of senescence observed at 50 μM, followed by a lower but still significant increase at 100 μM. Conversely, exposure to 200 μM H2O2 resulted in senescence levels comparable to the vehicle condition, suggesting that excessive oxidative stress compromised cell viability rather than promoting senescence (Supporting Information, Figure S3). Based on these results, 50 μM H2O2 was selected as the optimal concentration for inducing senescence.
Pre-treatment with PRAM-ADA significantly reduced the percentage of senescent cells at both 0.3 and 1 μM (Figure 5). In contrast, the parent compound pramipexole (PRAM), which does not release H2S, produced only a modest, although significant, attenuation of H2O2-induced senescence.
These results suggest that controlled H2S release enhances the anti-senescent effects of pramipexole, supporting the concept that H2S supplementation may counteract oxidative stress–accelerated senescence in PD pathophysiology.

3.6. Chemical and Enzymatic Stability

The physicochemical properties of the selected hybrid compound, with particular focus on chemical and enzymatic stability, were assessed at different physiological pH conditions and in nutrient-rich Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM).
The chemical stability of PRAM-ADA was assessed at physiological pH (PBS, pH 7.4) and under acidic conditions representative of the gastric environment (simulated gastric fluid, SGF, pH 1.2), while enzymatic stability was investigated in a serum-containing culture medium (DMEM supplemented with fetal bovine serum, FBS) to evaluate its behavior under physiologically relevant conditions. The concentrations of PRAM-ADA and parent compound derived from the hydrolytic cleavage (pramipexole) were quantified using RP-HPLC at definite time points.
When incubated in PBS at pH 7.4 and 37 °C, PRAM-ADA exhibited moderate stability, with a calculated half-life (t1/2) of 4.8 h. This result indicates that the molecule undergoes gradual degradation at physiological pH, suggesting a limited but measurable susceptibility to hydrolytic processes in an aqueous buffered environment. In contrast, a faster degradation was observed under acidic conditions; indeed, in SGF (pH 1.2), the compound showed a reduced half-life of 1.7 h, highlighting an increased instability in a strongly acidic medium.
The enzymatic stability was evaluated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS), a medium rich in proteins and enzymes that better approximates the biological environment encountered in vitro and, to some extent, in vivo. Under these conditions, PRAM-ADA displayed a half-life of 1.8 h, comparable to that observed in SGF. This finding indicates a pronounced susceptibility to enzymatic or protein-mediated degradation, likely due to the presence of serum hydrolytic enzymes.

4. Conclusions

The present study describes the design and pharmacological characterization of a new class of pramipexole-derived H2S-releasing hybrids aimed at addressing the major molecular and cellular processes implicated in PD. Herein, a thiourea group was employed for the first time as an H2S-donating linker. By integrating a dopaminergic pharmacophore with H2S-donating moieties, the designed molecules were developed to widen the therapeutic profile of pramipexole beyond dopamine receptor agonism.
Recent evidence supports a central neuroprotective role of H2S in Parkinson’s disease, particularly through the modulation of oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and cell death pathways. In this study, the pramipexole-based hybrid 2e (PRAM-ADA) emerged as the most effective intracellular H2S donor, displaying a sustained and thiol-dependent release profile associated with enhanced antioxidant and anti-senescent effects in microglial cells. Notably, PRAM-ADA significantly attenuated ROS accumulation and cellular senescence, key contributors to neuroinflammation and disease progression, outperforming pramipexole alone and highlighting the added value of H2S donation. Furthermore, its moderate stability under physiological conditions, combined with faster degradation in the biological environment, supports its potential as a dual-acting dopaminergic/H2S-releasing agent.
Although the findings reported here are highly encouraging, further investigations are required to validate these results in more physiologically relevant settings. In this regard, the intracellular release studies were performed in microglial cells, and additional analyses in dopaminergic neurons and astrocytes will be necessary to fully define the neuroprotective potential of these compounds. Despite these considerations, the current findings provide strong proof-of-concept for the therapeutic relevance of coupling dopaminergic agonism with H2S-based cytoprotection.
In conclusion, this study highlights the translational potential of pramipexole-derived H2S donors as innovative, multi-target agents for PD. By leveraging the distinct yet complementary actions of H2S and dopamine receptor modulation, these hybrid molecules may represent a new generation of multitarget neuroprotective agents.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox15050628/s1, Figure S1: Toxicity of PRAM and PRAM-ADA; Figure S2: Cell viability after LPS treatment; Figure S3: Cell viability following senescence protocol.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.; methodology, A.C., V.C. (Valentina Citi), A.M. and B.S.; validation, F.F., A.M. and C.F.; formal analysis, A.C., A.S., R.S. and G.N.; investigation, A.C., A.S., G.N. and V.C. (Valentina Citi); data curation, A.C., B.S., E.M., V.C. (Valentina Citi), C.F. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C. and V.C. (Valentina Citi); writing—review and editing, A.C., B.S., V.C. (Valentina Citi), A.M., F.F., V.C. (Vincenzo Calderone)., G.C.; visualization, A.C., A.S., G.N. and V.C. (Valentina Citi); supervision, G.C., V.S. and V.C. (Vincenzo Calderone).; project administration, A.C., V.C. (Valentina Citi), F.F. and B.S.; funding acquisition, G.C., V.S. and V.C. (Vincenzo Calderone). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
PD Parkinson’s disease
H2SHydrogen sulfide
ITCsIsothiocyanates
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
MTDLsMultitarget-directed ligands
TLCThin-layer chromatography
FTMSFourier transform mass spectrometer
AUCArea under the curve
DMEMDulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium
FBSFetal Bovine Serum
SGFSimulated gastric fluid
PRAMPramipexole

References

  1. Poewe, W.; Seppi, K.; Tanner, C.; Halliday, G.M.; Brundin, P.; Volkmann, J.; Schrag, A.-E.; Lang, A.E. Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017, 3, 17013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Morris, H.R.; Spillantini, M.G.; Sue, C.M.; Williams-Gray, C.H. The pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2024, 403, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olanow, C.W.; Stern, M.B.; Sethi, K. The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease. Neurology 2009, 72, S1–S136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chakrabarti, S.; Bisaglia, M. Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease: The Role of Dopamine Oxidation Products. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dong-Chen, X.; Yong, C.; Yang, X.; Chen-Yu, S.; Li-Hua, P. Signaling pathways in Parkinson’s disease: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kimura, H. Hydrogen sulfide as a neuromodulator. Mol. Neurobiol. 2002, 26, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Panthi, S.; Hyung-Joo, C.; Junyang, J.; Na Young, J. Physiological Importance of Hydrogen Sulfide: Emerging Potent Neuroprotector and Neuromodulator. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 9049782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dogaru, B.G.; Munteanu, C. The Role of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) in Epigenetic Regulation of Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hu, L.F.; Lu, M.; Tiong, C.X.; Dawe, G.S.; Hu, G.; Bian, J.S. Neuroprotective effects of hydrogen sulfide on Parkinson’s disease rat models. Aging Cell 2010, 9, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Vandiver, M.S.; Paul, B.D.; Xu, R.; Karuppagounder, S.; Rao, F.; Snowman, A.M.; Seok Ko, H.; Lee, Y.I.; Dawson, V.L.; Dawson, T.M.; et al. Sulfhydration mediates neuroprotective actions of parkin. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sita, G.; Hrelia, P.; Tarozzi, A.; Morroni, F. Isothiocyanates Are Promising Compounds against Oxidative Stress, Neuroinflammation and Cell Death that May Benefit Neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hacet, F.; Becer, E.; Vatansever, H.S.; Yücecan, S. Investigation of Neuroprotective Effects of Sulforaphane and Allyl Isothiocyanate in an in vitro Alzheimer’s Disease Model. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2023, 19, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Olayanju, J.B.; Bozic, D.; Naidoo, U.; Sadik, O.A. A Comparative Review of Key Isothiocyanates and Their Health Benefits. Nutrients 2024, 16, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Caglayan, B.; Kilic, E.; Dalay, A.; Altunay, S.; Tuzcu, M.; Erten, F.; Orhan, C.; Gunal, M.Y.; Yulug, B.; Juturu, V.; et al. Allyl isothiocyanate attenuates oxidative stress and inflammation by modulating Nrf2/HO-1 and NF-κB pathways in traumatic brain injury in mice. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, Y.; Yang, X.; Lu, Y.; Liang, D.; Huang, D. Isothiocyanates as H2S Donors Triggered by Cysteine: Reaction Mechanism and Structure and Activity Relationship. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 5977–5980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Scognamiglio, A.; Cerqua, I.; Citi, V.; Martelli, A.; Spezzini, J.; Calderone, V.; Rimoli, M.G.; Sodano, F.; Caliendo, G.; Santagada, V.; et al. Isothiocyanate-Corticosteroid Conjugates against asthma: Unity makes strength. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 275, 116636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sestito, S.; Daniele, S.; Pietrobono, D.; Citi, V.; Bellusci, L.; Chiellini, G.; Calderone, V.; Martini, C.; Rapposelli, S. Memantine prodrug as a new agent for Alzheimer’s Disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sestito, S.; Cirone, I.; Sagona, S.; Runfola, M.; Raffellini, L.; La Rocca, V.; Citi, V.; Martelli, A.; Daniele, S.; Lai, M.; et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of new H2S-releasing rivastigmine derivatives as neuroprotective molecules. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2025, 283, 117175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mierau, J.; Schneider, F.J.; Ensinger, H.A.; Chio, C.L.; Lajiness, M.E.; Huff, R.M. Pramipexole binding and activation of cloned and expressed dopamine D2, D3 and D4 receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1995, 290, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zaorska, E.; Hutsch, T.; Gawryś-Kopczyńska, M.; Ostaszewski, R.; Ufnal, M.; Koszelewski, D. Evaluation of thioamides, thiolactams and thioureas as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donors for lowering blood pressure. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 88, 102941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Citi, V.; Martelli, A.; Bucci, M.; Piragine, E.; Testai, L.; Vellecco, V.; Cirino, G.; Calderone, V. Searching for novel hydrogen sulfide donors: The vascular effects of two thiourea derivatives. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 159, 105039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Verhagen Metman, L.; Del Dotto, P.; van den Munckhof, P.; Fang, J.; Mouradian, M.M.; Chase, T.N. Amantadine as treatment for dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1998, 50, 1323–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Benavides, G.A.; Squadrito, G.L.; Mills, R.W.; Patel, H.D.; Isbell, T.S.; Patel, R.P.; Darley-Usmar, V.M.; Doeller, J.E.; Kraus, D.W. Hydrogen sulfide mediates the vasoactivity of garlic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 17977–17982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Itahana, K.; Campisi, J.; Dimri, G.P. Methods to detect biomarkers of cellular senescence: The senescence-associated beta-galactosidase assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Peterson, L.J.; Flood, P.M. Oxidative stress and microglial cells in Parkinson’s disease. Mediat. Inflamm. 2012, 2012, 401264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mosley, R.L.; Benner, E.J.; Kadiu, I.; Thomas, M.; Boska, M.D.; Hasan, K.; Laurie, C.; Gendelman, H.E. Neuroinflammation, Oxidative Stress and the Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease. Clin. Neurosci. Res. 2006, 6, 261–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, L.; Wang, Q. Advances of H2S in Regulating Neurodegenerative Diseases by Preserving Mitochondria Function. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tian, Q.; Tang, H.L.; Tang, Y.Y.; Zhang, P.; Kang, X.; Zou, W.; Tang, X.Q. Hydrogen Sulfide Attenuates the Cognitive Dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease Rats via Promoting Hippocampal Microglia M2 Polarization by Enhancement of Hippocampal Warburg Effect. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 2792348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Amperometric time-dependent H2S release from the pramipexole-based H2S donor derivatives tested at 1 mM, in the presence and absence of L-cysteine (4 mM). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 6).
Figure 1. Amperometric time-dependent H2S release from the pramipexole-based H2S donor derivatives tested at 1 mM, in the presence and absence of L-cysteine (4 mM). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 6).
Antioxidants 15 00628 g001
Figure 2. (A) Fluorescence index indicating the H2S release monitored for 60 min. (B) Quantification of the area under the curve (AUC) corresponding to H2S release. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n ≥ 6). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test versus vehicle. * indicates statistical significance vs. vehicle (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 2. (A) Fluorescence index indicating the H2S release monitored for 60 min. (B) Quantification of the area under the curve (AUC) corresponding to H2S release. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n ≥ 6). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test versus vehicle. * indicates statistical significance vs. vehicle (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Antioxidants 15 00628 g002
Figure 3. Quantification of ROS-+ cells following LPS-induced oxidative injury and treatment with PRAM-ADA hybrid compound. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 6). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. * indicates statistical significance vs. vehicle (*** p < 0.001); # vs. LPS (### p < 0.001); § vs. PRAM-ADA (§§§ p < 0.001). On the right, representative plots obtained for each treatment, through minicytofluorometric analysis. Green section represents cell debris. M1 indicates the population of ROS negative cells, while M2 ROS positive cells.
Figure 3. Quantification of ROS-+ cells following LPS-induced oxidative injury and treatment with PRAM-ADA hybrid compound. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 6). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. * indicates statistical significance vs. vehicle (*** p < 0.001); # vs. LPS (### p < 0.001); § vs. PRAM-ADA (§§§ p < 0.001). On the right, representative plots obtained for each treatment, through minicytofluorometric analysis. Green section represents cell debris. M1 indicates the population of ROS negative cells, while M2 ROS positive cells.
Antioxidants 15 00628 g003
Figure 4. Set up of the H2O2-induced senescence model. Cells were treated with vehicle or increasing concentrations of H2O2 (50, 100, and 200 μM), and senescence was quantified by β-galactosidase staining and expressed as the percentage of β-Gal–positive cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 6). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. * indicates statistical significance vs. vehicle (**** p < 0.0001).
Figure 4. Set up of the H2O2-induced senescence model. Cells were treated with vehicle or increasing concentrations of H2O2 (50, 100, and 200 μM), and senescence was quantified by β-galactosidase staining and expressed as the percentage of β-Gal–positive cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 6). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. * indicates statistical significance vs. vehicle (**** p < 0.0001).
Antioxidants 15 00628 g004
Figure 5. Quantification of senescent cells following H2O2-induced oxidative stress and treatment with PRAM-ADA hybrid compound. Cellular senescence was assessed by β-galactosidase staining and expressed as the percentage of β-Gal–positive cells relative to total cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 6). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. * indicates statistical significance vs. vehicle (*** p < 0.001); § vs. H2O2 (§§§ p < 0.001); # vs. PRAM (### p < 0.001). On the right, representative plots obtained for each treatment.
Figure 5. Quantification of senescent cells following H2O2-induced oxidative stress and treatment with PRAM-ADA hybrid compound. Cellular senescence was assessed by β-galactosidase staining and expressed as the percentage of β-Gal–positive cells relative to total cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 6). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. * indicates statistical significance vs. vehicle (*** p < 0.001); § vs. H2O2 (§§§ p < 0.001); # vs. PRAM (### p < 0.001). On the right, representative plots obtained for each treatment.
Antioxidants 15 00628 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Corvino, A.; Citi, V.; Scognamiglio, A.; Martelli, A.; Calderone, V.; Neggiani, G.; Fimognari, C.; Fiorino, F.; Magli, E.; Sparaco, R.; et al. Thiourea-Based H2S-Releasing Pramipexole Hybrids as Neuroprotective Agents. Antioxidants 2026, 15, 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15050628

AMA Style

Corvino A, Citi V, Scognamiglio A, Martelli A, Calderone V, Neggiani G, Fimognari C, Fiorino F, Magli E, Sparaco R, et al. Thiourea-Based H2S-Releasing Pramipexole Hybrids as Neuroprotective Agents. Antioxidants. 2026; 15(5):628. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15050628

Chicago/Turabian Style

Corvino, Angela, Valentina Citi, Antonia Scognamiglio, Alma Martelli, Vincenzo Calderone, Giulia Neggiani, Carmela Fimognari, Ferdinando Fiorino, Elisa Magli, Rosa Sparaco, and et al. 2026. "Thiourea-Based H2S-Releasing Pramipexole Hybrids as Neuroprotective Agents" Antioxidants 15, no. 5: 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15050628

APA Style

Corvino, A., Citi, V., Scognamiglio, A., Martelli, A., Calderone, V., Neggiani, G., Fimognari, C., Fiorino, F., Magli, E., Sparaco, R., Santagada, V., Caliendo, G., & Severino, B. (2026). Thiourea-Based H2S-Releasing Pramipexole Hybrids as Neuroprotective Agents. Antioxidants, 15(5), 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15050628

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop