Catechin and Phenolic Profiles of Fermented Miang (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) and Their Application as Natural Antioxidants in Cosmetic Formulations
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Extraction of Fermented Miang for Cosmetics
2.3. HPLC Determination of Catechins
2.4. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)
2.5. Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)
2.6. DPPH Radical Scavenging
2.7. Lactobacillus Enumeration and Identification
2.8. Cosmetic Prototypes and Stability Testing
2.9. Statistics
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Fermentation Time Effects and Extract Stability
3.2. Catechin Profiles by HPLC
3.3. Lactobacillus Content in Fermented Miang
3.4. Prototype Formulations and Stability
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BAM | Bacteriological analytical manual |
| C | Catechin |
| CFU | colony-forming units |
| DPPH | 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl |
| EC | Epicatechin |
| ECG | Epicatechin gallate |
| EGCG | Epigallocatechin gallate |
| FM | Fermented Miang |
| H&C | Cyclic hot–cold condition |
| HPLC | High-performance liquid chromatography |
| MJ | Samples collected from Mae-Jam village |
| MRS | Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe |
| NC | No change |
| PM | Samples collected from Pa-Miang village |
| QE | Quercetin equivalents |
| RT | Room temperature |
| TFC | Total flavonoid content |
| TPC | Total phenolic content |
| TSB | Tryptic soy broth |
References
- Goyal, A.; Sharma, A.; Kaur, J.; Kumari, S.; Garg, M.; Sindhu, R.K.; Rahman, M.H.; Akhtar, M.F.; Tagde, P.; Najda, A.; et al. Bioactive-Based Cosmeceuticals: An Update on Emerging Trends. Molecules 2022, 27, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pietta, P.G. Flavonoids as Antioxidants. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pathak, D.; Pathak, K.; Singla, A.K. Flavonoids as Medicinal Agents—Recent Advances. Fitoterapia 1991, 62, 371–389. [Google Scholar]
- Aburjai, T.; Natsheh, F.M. Plants Used in Cosmetics. Phytother. Res. 2003, 17, 987–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirisa-Ard, P.; Peerakam, N.; Sutheeponhwiroj, S.; Shimamura, T.; Kiatkarun, S. Biological Evaluation and Application of Fermented Miang (Camellia sinensis var. assamica (J.W.Mast.) Kitam.) for Tea Production. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 5, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
- Unban, K.; Chaichana, W.; Baipong, S.; Abdullahi, A.D.; Kanpiengjai, A.; Shetty, K.; Khanongnuch, C. Probiotic and Antioxidant Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Indigenous Fermented Tea Leaves (Miang) of North Thailand and Promising Application in Synbiotic Formulation. Fermentation 2021, 7, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, J.; Feng, N.; Guo, F.; Chen, Z.; Liang, J.; Wang, T.; Guo, X.; Xu, Z. Applications of Probiotic Constituents in Cosmetics. Molecules 2023, 28, 6765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puebla-Barragán, S.; Reid, G. Probiotics in Cosmetic and Personal Care Products: Trends and Challenges. Molecules 2021, 26, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masa, A.; Vilanova, M. Flavonoid and Aromatic Characterization of cv. Albarín blanco (Vitis vinifera L.). Food Chem. 2008, 107, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velioglu, Y.S.; Mazza, G.; Gao, L.; Oomah, B.D. Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolics in Selected Fruits, Vegetables, and Grain Products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 4113–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashish, A.; Zein, H.; El-Bhnsawy, R.M. Evaluation of Total Phenolic Compounds, Flavonoids and Antioxidant Activity of Black and Green Tea Drink Among Some Available Brands in The Egyptian Market. Curr. Sci. Int. 2018, 7, 721–730. [Google Scholar]
- Wojdyło, A.; Oszmiański, J.; Czemerys, R. Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Compounds in 32 Selected Herbs. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 940–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. FDA. Bacteriological Analytical Manual; Chapter 4; U.S. FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; AOAC: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Bae, J.; Kim, N.; Shin, Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, Y.J. Activity of Catechins and Their Applications. Biomed. Dermatol. 2020, 4, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Li, A.; Liu, H.; Mo, Q.; Zhong, Z. Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation on the Release and Biotransformation of Bound Phenolics in Ma Bamboo Shoots (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro). Foods 2025, 14, 2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayar-Sümer, E.N.; Verheust, Y.; Özçelik, B.; Raes, K. Impact of Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation Based on Biotransformation of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Mushrooms. Foods 2024, 13, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharbi, N.A. Polyphenol Metabolites in Fermented Foods: Biotransformation, Bioavailability, and Functional Roles. Front. Nutr. 2026, 29, 1767453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, J.-H.; Park, Y.-D.; Ahn, H.-K.; Kim, S.-J.; Lee, J.; Kim, E.-C.; Chang, Y.-S.; Song, Y.-J.; Kwon, H.-J. Analysis of Green Tea Compounds and Their Stability in Dentifrices of Different pH Levels. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 62, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jin, Y.; Jin, C.H.; Ho, R.K. Separation of Catechin Compounds from Different Teas. Biotechnol. J. 2006, 1, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fung, S.-T.; Ho, C.K.; Choi, S.-W.; Chung, W.-Y.; Benzie, I.F.F. Comparison of Catechin Profiles in Human Plasma and Urine after Single Dosing and Regular Intake of Green Tea (Camellia sinensis). Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 109, 2199–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira-Nunes, R.; Angelo, T.; da Silva, S.M.M.; Magalhaes, P.O.; Gratieri, T.; da Cunha-Filho, M.S.S.; Gelfuso, G.M. Versatile Chromatographic Method for Catechin Determination in Development of Topical Formulations Containing Natural Extracts. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2018, 32, e4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velayutham, P.; Babu, A.; Liu, D. Green Tea Catechins and Cardiovascular Health: An Update. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 1840–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khokhar, S.; Magnusdottir, S.G.M. Total Phenol, Catechin and Caffeine Contents of Teas Commonly Consumed in The United kingdom. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arct, J.; Bielenda, B.; Oborska, A.; Pytkowska, K. The Tea and Its Cosmetic Application. J. Appl. Cosmetol. 2003, 21, 117–127. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.; Jin, X.; Yaping, E.; Zheng, Z.S.; Zhang, Y.J.; Athar, M.; DeLeo, V.A.; Mukhtar, H.; Bickers, D.R.; Wang, Z.Y. Photoprotective Effect of Black Tea Extracts Against UVB-Induced Phototoxicity in Skin. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999, 70, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, H.Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, C.M.; Lee, Y.-M. Revolutionizing Cosmetic Ingredients: Harnessing the Power of Antioxidants, Probiotics, Plant Extracts, and Peptides in Personal and Skin Care Products. Cosmetics 2024, 11, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Havas, F.; Krispin, S.; Cohen, M.; Attia-Vigneau, J. A Hylocereus undatus Extract Enhances Skin Microbiota Balance and Delivers In-Vivo Improvements in Skin Health and Beauty. Cosmetics 2024, 11, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiselevsky, D.B.; Samuilova, O.V.; Samuilov, V.D. Epigallocatechin Gallate: pH-Dependent Redox Properties and Effect on Respiration, Photosynthesis, and Cell Death in Pea Plants. Biochemistry 2023, 88, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, R.; Aldholmi, M.; Alqathama, A.; Althomali, E.; Aljishi, F.; Mostafa, A.; Alqarni, A.M.; Shaaban, H. The Effect of Natural Antioxidants, pH, and Green Solvents Upon Catechins Stability During Ultrasonic Extraction from Green Tea Leaves (Camellia sinensis). Ultrason. Sonochem. 2023, 94, 106337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Name | % (w/w) | Function |
|---|---|---|
| FM extract | 5.00 | Active |
| Rice bran essence | 0.50 | Fragrance |
| Glycerin soap base | 94.50 | Base |
| Name | % (w/w) | Function |
|---|---|---|
| FM extract | 5.00 | Active |
| Coconut oil | 25.50 | Soap base component |
| Palm oil | 25.50 | Soap base component |
| Sesame oil | 6.40 | Soap base component |
| Olive oil | 3.20 | Soap base component |
| Castor oil | 3.20 | Soap base component |
| Sodium hydroxide | 9.60 | Saponifying agent |
| Distilled water | 21.00 | Diluent |
| Rice bran essence | 0.60 | Fragrance |
| Name | % (w/w) | Function |
|---|---|---|
| FM extract | 5.00 | Active |
| Ammonium lauryl sulfate | 35.00 | Surfactant |
| Cocamidopropyl betaine | 7.00 | Surfactant |
| Lauryl glucoside 1200 | 6.00 | Surfactant |
| Ammonium chloride | 0.70 | Viscosity modifier |
| Preservative | 0.60 | Preservative |
| Natural color | 1.00 | Colorant |
| Rice bran essence | 0.50 | Fragrance |
| Distilled water | 44.20 | Diluent |
| Phase | Name | % (w/w) | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Sodium Laureth Sulfate | 38.00 | Surfactant |
| Cocamidopropyl betaine | 6.00 | Cleanser | |
| DEA | 1.65 | Viscosity inducer | |
| Polyquaternium-7 | 2.60 | Conditioning | |
| Bis(C13–15 Alkoxy) PG–Amodimethicone | 0.20 | Protection for damaged hair | |
| B | Distilled water | 34.60 | Solvent |
| NaCl | 0.70 | Thickener | |
| C | Distilled water | 10.0 | Solvent |
| Polyquaternium-67 | 0.25 | Antistatic | |
| D | FM extract | 5.00 | Active |
| E | Preservative | 1.00 | Preservative |
| Sample | Fermentation Time (Months) | TPC (mg GAE/100 g) | TFC (mg QE/100 g) | IC50 (mg/mL) | % Inhibition (1 mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMA | 2 | 108.46 ± 0.79 a | 22.30 ± 0.11 a | 10.76 ± 0.47 a | 11.13 ± 0.54 a |
| FMB | 4 | 263.22 ± 2.01 b | 74.66 ± 2.65 b | 4.44 ± 0.00 b | 15.62 ± 0.04 b |
| FMC | 6 | 85.68 ± 2.00 c | 17.19 ± 1.03 c | 13.57 ± 0.00 c | 9.80 ± 0.76 c |
| Stability | Month | 4 °C | 45 °C | RT (25 ± 2 °C) | H&C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Inhibition | 0 | - | - | 15.62 ± 0.04 a | - |
| 1 | 14.22 ± 0.15 a | 12.25 ± 0.24 a | 14.10 ± 0.10 b | 12.24 ± 0.34 d | |
| 3 | 13.62 ± 0.26 b | 13.10 ± 0.30 b | 13.50 ± 0.11 c | - | |
| pH | 0 | - | - | 6.02 ± 0.03 a | - |
| 1 | NC a | NC a | NC a | 5.93 ± 0.01 d | |
| 3 | 5.58 ± 0.01 b | 5.34 ± 0.02 b | 5.52 ± 0.01 b | - |
| No. | Compound | Content (mg/g Dry Sample) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Epicatechin (EC) | 2.23 ± 0.02 a |
| 2 | Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) | 7.00 ± 0.93 b |
| 3 | Epigallocatechin (EGC) | 0.21 ± 0.23 c |
| 4 | Epicatechin gallate (ECG) | 1.76 ± 0.62 a |
| 5 | Catechin (C) | 2.41 ± 0.02 a |
| Sample | Maturity and Fermentation Duration | Appearance (Before Fermentation) | Appearance (After Fermentation) | % Yield (w/w) | Lactic Acid Bacteria (CFU/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM-fresh | Fresh leaf, mature | Dark green, thick leaf | Brown | 7.31 | Not found |
| PM-001 | Young leaf, 1 month | Green-brown leaf | Brown | 4.88 | 9.3 × 106 |
| PM-002 | Mature leaf 12 months | Brown-green leaf | Brown | 5.74 | 4.9 × 104 |
| PM-003 | Young leaf, 2 months | Brown-green leaf | Brown | 5.62 | 6.9 × 107 |
| PM-004 | Mature leaf, 2 months | Green, brown leaf | Green | 6.02 | 3.1 × 107 |
| PM-005 | Young leaf, 2 months | Green brown leaf | Green brown | 8.43 | 1.1 × 107 |
| PM-006 | Mature leaf, 12 months | Brown leaf | Brown | 4.90 | 6.6 × 106 |
| PM-007 | Young leaf, 2 months | Green-brown leaf | Green brown | 8.74 | 8.4 × 106 |
| PM-008 | Mature leaf, 12 months | Brown leaf | Green brown | 5.31 | 5.6 × 106 |
| PM-009 | Young leaf, 1 month | Brown leaf | Brown | 4.40 | 5.4 × 106 |
| PM-010 | Young leaf, 1 month | Brown leaf | Brown | 4.62 | 7.3 × 106 |
| MJ-fresh | Fresh leaf, mature | Light-green leaf | Brown | 5.81 | Not found |
| MJ-001 | Mature leaf, 12 months | Green, brown leaf | Light brown | 6.46 | 9.3 × 107 |
| MJ-002 | Mature leaf, 12 months | Green, brown leaf | Dark brown | 6.82 | 1.1 × 108 |
| MJ-003 | Mature leaf, 12 months | Brown leaf | Brown | 6.03 | 6.6 × 106 |
| MJ-004 | Mature leaf, 12 months | Green, brown leaf | Green, brown | 4.89 | 9.6 × 106 |
| Product | Condition (After 3 Months) | Physical Characteristics | pH | % Inhibition (1 mg/mL DPPH) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid Soap | Day 0 | Clear, pale yellow color; characteristic FM odor; no phase separation; good cleansing effect | 6.23 ± 0.02 a | 7.85 ± 0.34 a |
| 4 °C | NC | 6.03 ± 0.02 b | 5.11 ± 0.10 b | |
| RT | Reduced viscosity; clear yellow color; no phase separation; good cleansing effect | 5.93 ± 0.02 c | 5.05 ± 0.35 b | |
| 45 °C | Slight decrease in viscosity | 5.84 ± 0.02 d | 4.91 ± 0.20 b | |
| H&C | NC | 6.17 ± 0.01 e | 6.08 ± 0.24 c | |
| Shampoo | Day 0 | Clear, pale yellow solution; characteristic FM odor; no phase separation; good cleansing effect | 7.08 ± 0.02 a | 9.13 ± 0.52 a |
| 4 °C | NC | 6.82 ± 0.01 b | 8.08 ± 0.13 b | |
| RT | NC | 6.81 ± 0.01 b | 7.55 ± 0.38 b,d | |
| 45 °C | NC | 6.62 ± 0.01 d | 7.12 ± 0.20 c,d | |
| H&C | NC | 6.94 ± 0.01 e | 8.01 ± 0.16 b | |
| Glycerin Soap Bar | Day 0 | Yellow to pale red hard soap; characteristic FM odor; medium foam; moisturizing effect | 9.95 ± 0.00 a | 8.55 ± 1.50 a |
| 4 °C | NC | 9.13 ± 0.02 b | 7.25 ± 0.81 a | |
| RT | NC | 8.82 ± 0.02 c | 6.85 ± 2.10 a | |
| 45 °C | Texture changed | 9.33 ± 0.02 d | 6.01 ± 0.22 a | |
| H&C | Texture changed | 9.83 ± 0.02 e | 7.02 ± 0.21 a | |
| Opaque Soap Bar | Day 0 | Off-white to yellow hard soap; characteristic FM odor; good foaming and cleansing effect | 9.20 ± 0.02 a | 8.40 ± 1.20 a |
| 4 °C | Slight color change | 8.32 ± 0.03 b | 7.05 ± 2.10 a | |
| RT | Slight color change | 8.55 ± 0.02 c | 7.10 ± 1.31 a | |
| 45 °C | Texture changed | 9.00 ± 0.02 d | 6.21 ± 1.03 a | |
| H&C | Texture changed | 9.14 ± 0.02 e | 6.20 ± 1.20 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Sirisa-Ard, P.; Julsrigival, J.; Chansakaow, S.; Punjaisee, S.; Tipduangta, P.; Pholsongkram, K.; Charoensup, W.; Peerakam, N.; Akarchariya, N. Catechin and Phenolic Profiles of Fermented Miang (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) and Their Application as Natural Antioxidants in Cosmetic Formulations. Antioxidants 2026, 15, 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15040497
Sirisa-Ard P, Julsrigival J, Chansakaow S, Punjaisee S, Tipduangta P, Pholsongkram K, Charoensup W, Peerakam N, Akarchariya N. Catechin and Phenolic Profiles of Fermented Miang (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) and Their Application as Natural Antioxidants in Cosmetic Formulations. Antioxidants. 2026; 15(4):497. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15040497
Chicago/Turabian StyleSirisa-Ard, Panee, Jakaphun Julsrigival, Sunee Chansakaow, Suchart Punjaisee, Pramote Tipduangta, Kiatisak Pholsongkram, Wannaree Charoensup, Nichakan Peerakam, and Nararat Akarchariya. 2026. "Catechin and Phenolic Profiles of Fermented Miang (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) and Their Application as Natural Antioxidants in Cosmetic Formulations" Antioxidants 15, no. 4: 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15040497
APA StyleSirisa-Ard, P., Julsrigival, J., Chansakaow, S., Punjaisee, S., Tipduangta, P., Pholsongkram, K., Charoensup, W., Peerakam, N., & Akarchariya, N. (2026). Catechin and Phenolic Profiles of Fermented Miang (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) and Their Application as Natural Antioxidants in Cosmetic Formulations. Antioxidants, 15(4), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15040497

