Next Article in Journal
Oxidized-LDL Deteriorated the Renal Residual Function and Parenchyma in CKD Rat through Upregulating Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and Extracellular Matrix-Mediated Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis—Pharmacomodulation of Rosuvastatin
Next Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Phytochemical Screening and Antioxidant Activity of Commercial Moringa oleifera Food Supplements
Previous Article in Journal
Anticancer Effects of High Glucosinolate Synthesis Lines of Brassica rapa on Colorectal Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenolics and Volatile Compounds of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) Seeds and Their Sprouts Prevent Oxidative DNA Damage and Ameliorates CCl4-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Oxidative Stress in Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Profiling of Redox-Active Lipophilic Constituents in Leaf Mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.) Cultivars Using LC-MS and GC-MS

Department of Crop Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(12), 2464; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11122464
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 29 November 2022 / Accepted: 10 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Phytochemical Antioxidants in Food)

Abstract

:
Leaf mustard is an important commercial and culinary vegetable. However, only limited information is available on the content and composition of the nutritionally important lipophilic constituents in these leaves. This research presents information on the contents and composition of carotenoids, tocols, phytosterols, and fatty acids in four cultivars of leaf mustard. The carotenoids and tocols were analyzed utilizing liquid chromatography (LC)–mass spectrometry (MS) with single ion monitoring (SIM), while phytosterols and fatty acids were analyzed using gas chromatography (GC)–MS and GC-flame ionization detection (FID), respectively. The LC-MS results revealed the dominance of (all-E)-lutein, within the range of 37.12 (cv. Asia Curled)—43.54% (cv. Jeok) of the total carotenoids. The highest amount of all of the individual carotenoids and total carotenoids (143.85 µg/g fresh weight; FW) were recorded in cv. Cheong. Among the studied leaf samples, 67.16 (cv. Asia Curled)—83.42 µg/g FW (cv. Cheong) of α-tocopherol was recorded. Among the phytosterols, β-sitosterol was the most dominant one among the studied mustard leaves, accounting for 80.42 (cv. Jeok)—83.14% (cv. Red frill) of the total phytosterols. The fatty acid analysis revealed the presence of a significant amount of rare hexadecatrienoic acid (C16:3n3) in the studied mustard leaves, which accounted for 27.17 (cv. Asia Curled)—32.59% (cv. Red frill) of the total fatty acids. Overall, the cv. Cheong represented the highest contents of carotenoids, tocols, and phytosterols. Moreover, cv. Red frill contains the highest amount of n-3 PUFAs and antioxidant compounds. Thus, these cultivars can be promoted in cuisines which can be eaten to obtain the highest health benefits.

1. Introduction

The epidemiological and clinical studies have shown the inverse relationship between the dietary consumption of fruits and vegetables and the prevalence of chronic diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), neurodegenerative diseases, obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), as well as all-cause mortality [1,2,3]. The bioactive antioxidant compounds, including the carotenoids and tocols present in fruits and vegetables, neutralize the cellular system’s free radicals, thus preventing the oxidative damage of cells, proteins, and DNA, resulting in a low incidence of related diseases [4,5,6].
Brassica vegetables are a rich source of carotenoids [7], tocopherols [8], and several other bioactive compounds [9]. Brassica juncea (L.) Czern., which is commonly known as leaf mustard, brown mustard, Korean leaf mustard, Oriental mustard, and vegetable mustard, is an annual herb belonging to the Brassicaceae family. The leaf mustard is widely used in Asian, African, Southern, and American cuisines.
Carotenoids are tetraterpenoid pigments that are universally synthesized by all photoautotrophs. In animals, provitamin A carotenoids (e.g., α- and β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin) play essential roles by providing a dietary source of provitamin A. Additionally, in animals, the antioxidant activities of provitamin A and non-provitamin A carotenoids downregulate the pro-inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress and upregulate the cytoprotective phase II enzymes, thus protecting the consumer from cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic syndromes (T2D and CVD), and photooxidative damage to the eyes and skin [6,10].
Tocopherols and tocotrienols (α-, β-, γ-, and δ), which are collectively known as tocols, tocochromanols, or vitamin E) are vital components of cellular lipids, scavenging the free radicals, thus protecting the lipids from oxidative damage. With their crucial role in minimizing oxidative stress, a tocols-rich diet helps to minimize the incidence of CVD, neurodegenerative diseases, and several types of cancer [11,12,13].
Phytosterols (plant sterols) are another class of health-beneficial compounds that play a vital role in maintaining the blood level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and endothelial function [14]. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the dietary intake of 2 g/d of non-esterified plant sterols is necessary to achieve the health benefits of lowering the blood total and LDL and reducing the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) [15].
Leafy vegetables are not a significant source of fatty acids as they contain a small amount of total lipids (2–4%, dry weight) [16,17]. However, >50% of the total fatty acids in leafy vegetables are found in the form of α-linolenic acid (ALA, C18:3 cis-9,12,15), a type of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). In the body, the administrated ALA is used in the bioconversion to very long chain (VLC)-PUFAs that are beneficial to health, such as eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acids (DHA) [18].
Most of the previous studies of the bioactive composition of leaf mustard have been focused on polyphenolic compounds [9,19], glucosinolates [20], and volatile components [21], while only a few studies are available on the composition of lipophilic bioactive compounds, such as carotenoids, tocopherols, phytosterols, and fatty acids. Moreover, the fatty acids and sterols were mainly investigated from seeds [22]. Furthermore, the bioactive composition may vary with the genetic, geographical, and environmental factors [23,24].
Considering the above facts, the present study aimed to investigate the composition of major lipophilic compounds, including carotenoids, tocols, sterols, and fatty acids in four cultivars of leaf mustard that are commonly consumed in Korea. The carotenoids and tocols were analyzed utilizing the liquid chromatography (LC)-single ion monitoring (SIM)-based mass spectrometry (MS) method. The phytosterols were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC)–MS, and the fatty acids were analyzed by GC-flame ionization detection (FID) and GC-MS. Moreover, the capabilities of scavenging free radicals were determined using DPPH and ABTS•+ assays. The carotenoids, tocols, phytosterols, and fatty acid composition data reported herein may help explore the bioactive potential of leaf mustard. Moreover, the knowledge of carotenoids, tocopherols, phytosterols, and fatty acids composition in different cultivars will be helpful in the selection of nutrient-dense cultivars for culinary preparations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Reagents, and Standards

The seeds of four Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. cultivars, Jeok (M1), Cheong (M2), Red frill (M3), and Asia Curled (M4) were obtained from Asia Seeds Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea. The seeds were grown in the greenhouse at the ambient temperature and humidity (mean temperature of 10–15 °C) in March 2022–May 2022. Each cultivar was grown in three pots of 28 × 48 cm that were filled with a commercial potting mixture (Asia Seeds Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea) containing 300–500 ppm NPK, and with a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 30–100 cmol/kg.
After germination (a week after sowing), 18–20 plants were maintained in each pot. The plants were raised without applying any fertilizers and pesticides. Seven weeks after the showing, the healthy leaves from the entire plant were harvested, cleaned for the presence of foreign particles, and stored in a −80 °C deep freezer (Ilshin Biobase Co., Ltd., Dongducheonsi, Gyeonggido, Republic of Korea) until their analysis. Figure 1 shows the phenotypic diversity among the mustard cultivars used in this investigation.
Authentic standards of (all-E)-β-carotene, fatty acid standard mix (CRM47885), 5-β-cholestan-3α-ol (internal standard), β-sitosterol (24α-ethyl cholesterol), campesterol (24α-methyl cholesterol), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS•+) were obtained from Merck Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea. The tocols mix solution containing δ-, γ-, β-, and α-tocotrienol and δ-, γ-, β-, and α-tocopherol was purchased from ChromaDex, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA. The (all-E)-violaxanthin, 9-Z-neoxanthin, and (all-E)-lutein used in this study were purified from lettuce, and the (all-E)-zeaxanthin was purified from corn seeds using our established protocol [25].
All of the organic solvents used for extraction were of LC grade, and they were obtained from J.T. Baker® (Avantor Performance Materials Korea Ltd.), Suwon-Si, Republic of Korea.

2.2. Extraction of Crude Lipids (Lipophilic Compounds)

The lipophilic compounds, including the carotenoids, tocols, sterols, and fatty acids, were extracted simultaneously from fresh mustard leaves following our optimized protocol [17] with minor modifications. The detailed extraction procedure is given in Appendix A Figure A1. Synthetic antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was added to the extraction solvent (0.1% w/v) to prevent the degradation of the lipophilic compounds [26].
The tocols and carotenoids were simultaneously analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)-selected-ion monitoring (SIM)-based tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods without hydrolysis as it can degrade these compounds [27].
An aliquot of the extracted sample was hydrolyzed and converted to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) (Figure A2) and trimethylsiloxy [−O-Si(CH3)3; TMS] derivatives (Figure A3) [27], and these were utilized for the GC-FID and GC-MS analyses of the fatty acids and phytosterols, respectively.

2.3. LC-SIM-MS Analysis of Tocols and Carotenoids

The major redox-active lipophilic constituents were analyzed by LC-SIM-based mass spectrometry method utilizing LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The LC-MS parameters used for the analysis of carotenoids and tocols are shown in Table 1. Additionally, the selected ion monitoring (SIM) parameters used for the analysis of carotenoids and tocols are shown in Table 2.

2.4. Fames Determinations by GC-FID and GC-MS

The FAMEs were qualitatively analyzed by GC (Agilent 7890B, Agilent Technologies Canada, Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada). The analytical conditions are shown in Table 3. For the accurate identification of the FAMEs, the mass spectrum was recorded using the QP2010 SE GS-MS (Shimadzu, Japan) following the GC-FID thermal program. The mass fragmentation pattern was compared with the authentic standards as well as reference databases (NIST08, NIST08S, and Wiley9) to confirm the identity of the FAMEs.

2.5. GC-MS Analysis of Sterols

The sterols were analyzed after silylation utilizing QP2010 SE GC-MS (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The analytical conditions are shown in Table 4. The identity of the sterols was confirmed by comparing their mass fragmentation patterns with the authentic standards as well as reference databases (Wiley9, NIST08, and NIST08S).

2.6. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activities were analyzed using two different types of extracts. Extract one (containing lipophilic compounds) was prepared (without adding the BHT), as mentioned in Section 2.2. The second extract was prepared using aqueous methanol. To prepare this extract, two grams of fresh leaves of each cultivar were extracted with 25 mL of aqueous methanol (80% v/v) as described previously [17]. The ABTS•+ and DPPH radical scavenging abilities were determined according to our optimized method [28], based on Thaipong et al. [29]. The results were expressed in mg Trolox equivalents (TE)/100 g fresh weight (FW).

2.7. Statistical Analysis and Quality Control

A total of four replicate extractions and analyses were performed for each leaf sample. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using IBM SPSS statistics (version 25), taking into account a significance level of 0.05 (Tukey HSD).
The limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantitation (LOQ) were determined according to the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio between >3 and >10, respectively, for the quantitative analysis utilizing LC-MS [30].
The GC-MS method used for phytosterols analysis was recently validated [31]. The recoveries of the phytosterols were accurately monitored and normalized using 5β-cholestan-3α-ol as the internal standard (IS).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Carotenoids and Tocols Composition

The solvent mixture with acetone/ethanol/hexane is most frequently employed to extract the polar and nonpolar carotenoids simultaneously [30]. In the preliminary investigations, we found that this solvent combination is effective for the simultaneous extraction of carotenoids, tocols, phytosterols, and fatty acids from mustard leaves. Moreover, considering the health and environmental hazards associated with hexane, this solvent was replaced with cyclohexane [32], which is safer and provided a similar yield of these lipophilic compounds from the studied samples (data not shown).
In the present study, six major carotenoids, viz., (all-E)-violaxanthin, 9-Z-neoxanthin (all-E)-luteoxanthin, (all-E)-lutein, (all-E)-zeaxanthin, and (all-E)-β-carotene, were identified and quantified using the LC-SIM-based MS/MS method (Figure 2, Table 5). The obtained concentrations of all of the carotenoids were well above the LOQ (Table A1).
Among the studied mustard leaves of four cultivars, (all-E)-lutein was the most dominating carotenoid, ranging between 37.12 (cv. Asia Curled) and 43.54% (cv. Jeok) of the total carotenoids, which was followed by (all-E)-β-carotene and (all-E)-violaxanthin. The highest amount of all of the individual carotenoids and total carotenoids (143.85 µg/g fresh weight; FW) were recorded in cv. Cheong.
In the present investigation, among all of the studied cultivars, the lutein contents were 2.1–2.6 times higher than the β-carotene ones were. However, previous studies on B. juncea leaves recorded significantly varied β-carotene and lutein levels. For instance, Frazie et al. [33] analyzed the carotenoid profile of leaves of eight B. juncea cultivars that were grown, including the Jeok cultivar analyzed in the present investigation. In this study, the β-carotene contents were 1.14 times higher than the lutein ones were in the mature leaves of the Jeok cultivar. Similarly, Farnham et al. [7] recorded 88.0–129.2 µg/g FW of β-carotene and 61.2–88.6 µg/g FW of lutein in the field-grown mature leaves of the B. juncea cultivars. In contrast, Zeb [34] recorded 124 µg/g FW of β-carotene and 184 µg/g FW of lutein in the B. juncea leaves marketed in Pakistan.
We previously analyzed the carotenoid profile of 23 diverse lettuce cultivars and recorded 54.4–129.8 µg/g FW of the total carotenoids. Moreover, in that study, the (all-E)-β-carotene content ranged between 4.24 and 12.9 µg/g FW (7.30–13.03% of the total carotenoids), while in the present study, the (all-E)-β-carotene contents ranged between 21.34 and 24.45 µg/g FW (16.00—17.98% of the total carotenoids). This shows that mustard leaves are a richer source of provitamin A carotenoid (β-carotene) and total carotenoids than lettuce is.
The tocols include four naturally occurring tocopherols (δ-, γ-, β-, and α-) and four tocotrienols (δ-, γ-, β-, and α-) [13]. This study screened the mustard leaves for their tocols composition using LC-SIM-MS. In all of the studied samples, 67.16 (cv. Asia Curled)—83.42 µg/g FW (cv. Cheong) of α-tocopherol was recorded (Table 5), while other forms were not detected in a substantial amount. Only a few studies are available on the tocopherol contents of B. juncea leaves as most of the studies were focused on seed oil. Zeb [34] recorded 13.5 µg/g FW of α-tocopherol in the B. juncea leaves marketed in Pakistan. In contrast, Xiao et al. [8] recorded 221 µg/g FW of α-tocopherol in the commercially grown B. juncea microgreens.
Attributable to the presence of high contents of bioactive antioxidant compounds, such as carotenoids and tocopherols in mustard leaf, their intake can minimize the oxidative stress-related diseases, including CVD, T2D, neurodegenerative disorders, and various types of cancer [35,36,37].

3.2. Phytosterol Contents

In this study, the phytosterols derivatized with trimethylsiloxy groups (−O-Si(CH3)3; TMS) and analyzed utilizing GC-MS revealed the presence of β-sitosterol (24α-ethyl cholesterol) and campesterol (24α-methyl cholesterol) in the mustard leaves (Figure A4 and Figure A5).
In the present study, β-sitosterol was the most dominant phytosterol among the studied mustard leaves, ranging between 151.39 (cv. Red frill) and 240.34 (cv. Cheong) µg/g FW, which accounted for 80.42 (cv. Jeok)—83.14% (cv. Red frill) of the total sterol (Table 6). Limited studies are available on the sterol composition of leaf mustard and other brassica family vegetables. Among the vegetables and fruits commonly consumed in China, β-sitosterol was the most dominating phytosterol, with the highest concentration of it (µg/g FW) in pea (414), cauliflower (408), and broccoli (345), while in rape (probably Brassica napus), 85 and 14 µg/g of β-sitosterol and campesterol was recorded, respectively [38].
We have previously recorded the dominance of β-sitosterol in herbs such as perilla (Perilla frutescens Britt.; 27.7–37.9 µg/g FW) [39] and Kaempferia parviflora Wall. Ex Baker (30.6–36.6 µg/g FW) [40] with campesterol as a minor phytosterol.
The results of the present investigation and previous report suggest that the Brassica family vegetables, including leaf mustard, are good sources of bioactive phytosterols.

3.3. Fatty Acids

Herbs (photosynthetic tissue) are not a significant source of fatty acids as they are generally deficient in total lipids (2–4%, dry weight) [18]. However, herbs contain high proportions of health-beneficial omega-3 (n-3) fatty acid in the form of α-linolenic (ALA; C18:3n3).
In the present study, six major fatty acids were identified from the mustard leaf, and their relative occurrence (percentages of the total fatty acids) were estimated (Figure 3; Table 7). Among the studied mustard leaves, ALA was the most dominant fatty acid, accounting for 36.09 (cv. Cheong)—38.98% (cv. Asia Curled) of the total fatty acids. The previous reports also state that ALA is the most abundant fatty acid in herbs (e.g., green leafy vegetables), such as cabbage and spinach [41], perilla (Perilla frutescens Britt.) [39], lettuce [17], and Komatsuna (Japanese mustard spinach; Brassica rapa var. perviridis), and Tatsoi (Brassica rapa var. rosularis) [42].
In contrast to other herbs, a significant amount of hexadecatrienoic acid (C16:3n3; all-cis 7,10,13) was recorded from the studied mustard leaves, accounting for 27.17 (cv. Asia Curled)—32.59% (cv. Red frill) of the total fatty acids. The GC–mass spectrum of the hexadecatrienoic acid identified from the mustard leaves is given in Figure A6.
The presence of a substantial amount of hexadecatrienoic acid is rare in higher plants. However, it has been previously recorded in the photosynthetic tissue of Brassica napus L. and Brassica oleracea L., which are classified as “16:3” plants (containing >2% of C16:3 fatty acids in total lipids), which is part of primitive lipid metabolism [43]. Interestingly, the contents of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the photosynthetic leaves of B. napus L. are largely influenced by the environmental temperatures [24]. A low temperature induces fatty acid desaturation in B. napus L., resulting in an enhanced accumulation of C18:3 and C16:3 fatty acids, which helps maintain the fluidity in the membrane at a low temperature [24]. A substantially high amount of hexadecatrienoic acid recorded in the present investigation was probably a result of the low temperature (mean temperature of 10–15 °C) during the growth of the mustard plants.
From the nutritional perspective, the dominance of ALA and hexadecatrienoic acid in the mustard leaves makes them exceptionally rich in total PUFAs, containing 74.99–78.28% of the total fatty acids. Moreover, the total PUFAs/total saturated fatty acids (SFAs) were high (5.63 in cv. Cheong—7.26 in cv. Red frill).
Omega-3 (n-3) PUFAs are essential for normal growth and development. Moreover, they have vital positive effects on the brain, eyes, heart, joints, skin, mood, and behavior [18]. Thus, consuming mustard leaves for major nutritionally vital phytoconstituents (e.g., vitamins) and high proportions of n-3 PUFAs (63.89–69.74% of total fatty acids) may be one of their health benefits.

3.4. Antioxidant Activity

In the present study, the antioxidant activities were analyzed from two different types of extracts. Interestingly, the aqueous methanolic extract showed 2–5-fold more ABTS•+ and DPPH radical scavenging activities compared to the lipophilic extract prepared using acetone/ethanol/cyclohexane (1:1:2, v/v; recovered in acetone) (Table 8). The previous studies have also revealed that methanol/water extract provides better ABTS•+ and DPPH radical scavenging activities from herbs than the extracts do which were obtained with acetone [44,45]. In the investigations of the antioxidant activity of Daphne gnidioides L. and Daphne sericea L. leaves, the methanol extracts showed 2–3-fold more ABTS•+ and DPPH radical scavenging compared to the acetone extract. Similarly, from the Amaranthus leaf, the methanol/water extract showed significantly higher antioxidant activities and total phenolic contents (TPC) than the extract did that was prepared in acetone.
In herbs, the phenolic compounds (flavonoids and phenolic acids), tocopherols, ascorbic acid, and carotenoids are major antioxidants [46]. The present study used an acetone/ethanol/cyclohexane-based solvent to extract the lipophilic compounds, including carotenoids, tocopherols, sterols, and fatty acids. However, the significantly highest radical scavenging activities obtained from the aqueous methanolic extract were probably the results of a higher extraction of polyphenolic compounds.
The present study recorded the highest contents of carotenoids and α-tocopherol from cv. Cheong. However, the aqueous methanolic prepared from cv. Red frill showed significantly more ABTS•+ (640.66 mg TE/100 g FW) and DPPH radical scavenging (284.96 mg TE/100 g FW) activities (Table 8). In contrast, among the lipophilic extracts prepared using acetone/ethanol/cyclohexane, cv. Cheong showed significantly higher ABTS•+ activity values of 148.27 mg TE/100 g FW (Table 8). Interestingly, the α-tocopherol content (Table 5) was also highest in this cultivar (cv. Cheong). Moreover, the α-tocopherol contents showed a significant positive correlation (R = 0.796) with the ABTS•+ activity of the lipophilic extract (Table 9), which suggests that the α-tocopherol contents present in the mustard leaves are efficient scavenger of ABTS•+ radicals. In addition, the phytosterol contents correlate well (R = 0.949) with the α-tocopherol contents (Table 9). Surprisingly, in the present study, the total carotenoid contents were not correlated with the antioxidant activities (Table 9), suggesting that bioactives other than the carotenoids are more potent antioxidants in the mustard leaves.
Both the ABTS•+ and DPPH radical scavenging assays employed in the present study are based on the electron transfer (ET) mechanism. In agreement with previous reports [29,47], a significant correlation was obtained between these assays (Table 9).
The Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) in Brassica vegetables has shown a significant positive correlation with the anthocyanins contents [48]. Thus, the significantly highest radical scavenging activities obtained from cv. Red frill was probably the result of a high accumulation of anthocyanin pigments—the intense red color of cv. Red frill leaves, compared to other studied cultivars (Figure 1), also suggest a presence of a substantial amount of anthocyanins.

4. Conclusions

The results of the present study indicate that the contents of carotenoids, α-tocopherol, phytosterols, and fatty acids varied significantly among the cultivars. Among the mustard leaves of four cultivars studied, the highest contents of the total carotenoids (143.85 µg/g FW), α-tocopherol (83.42 µg/g FW), and total phytosterols (294.30 µg/g FW) were recorded in cv. Cheong.
Interestingly, the fatty acid analysis revealed the presence of a significant amount of rare hexadecatrienoic acid (C16:3n3) in the studied mustard leaves, accounting for 27.17 (cv. Asia Curled)—32.59% (cv. Red frill) of the total fatty acids. Moreover, the dominance of α-linolenic (ALA; C18:3n3) and hexadecatrienoic acid in the mustard leaves makes them exceptionally rich in total omega-3 (n-3) PUFAs, with the highest contents of 69.74% in cv. Red frill.
Overall, the cv. Cheong represented the highest contents of carotenoids, tocols, and phytosterols. Moreover, cv. Red frill contains the highest amount of n-3 PUFAs and antioxidant compounds. Thus, the use of these cultivars can be promoted in cuisines which can be eaten to obtain the highest health benefits. Further studies may be beneficial in revealing the hydrophilic constituents, including anthocyanin, in leaf mustard cultivars.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: R.K.S. and J.-W.Y.; methodology, R.K.S. and J.-W.Y.; software, R.K.S.; validation, R.K.S., J.-W.Y. and Y.-S.K.; formal analysis, R.K.S., M.-H.S., H.-Y.A. and J.-H.L. (Jung-Hoon Lee); investigation, R.K.S., M.-H.S. and J.-W.Y.; resources, Y.-S.K. and J.-H.L. (Ji-Ho Lee); data curation, R.K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.K.S.; writing—review and editing, R.K.S. and J.-H.L. (Ji-Ho Lee); visualization, R.K.S.; supervision, Y.-S.K.; project administration, M.-H.S.; funding acquisition, J.-H.L. (Ji-Ho Lee). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the KU research professor program of Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. The outline of the method used for the extraction of lipophilic compounds from the mustard leaves.
Figure A1. The outline of the method used for the extraction of lipophilic compounds from the mustard leaves.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g0a1
Figure A2. Methods used for the hydrolysis and the preparation of fatty acid methyl esters.
Figure A2. Methods used for the hydrolysis and the preparation of fatty acid methyl esters.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g0a2
Figure A3. Method used for the hydrolysis and silylation of sterols for GC-MS analysis.
Figure A3. Method used for the hydrolysis and silylation of sterols for GC-MS analysis.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g0a3
Table A1. Limits of detection (LOD; Lower limit of detection) and limits of quantitation (LOQ; Lower limit of quantitation) of carotenoids and tocols analyzed utilizing LC-MS/MS.
Table A1. Limits of detection (LOD; Lower limit of detection) and limits of quantitation (LOQ; Lower limit of quantitation) of carotenoids and tocols analyzed utilizing LC-MS/MS.
S/NCompound ClassCompoundRet. TimeLOQ
( µ g / g )
LOD   ( µ g / g )
1Carotenoids(all-E)-violaxanthin14.4960.790.26
29-Z-neoxanthin15.4133.211.07
3(all-E)-luteoxanthin16.0000.350.12
4(all-E)-lutein19.7380.350.12
5(all-E)-zeaxanthin21.2800.100.03
6(all-E)-β-carotene32.1790.360.12
7Tocolsα-tocopherol16.7051.340.44
Figure A4. A representative mass fragmentation pattern of cholesterol (trimethylsiloxy (TMS) derivative) observed in the present investigation.
Figure A4. A representative mass fragmentation pattern of cholesterol (trimethylsiloxy (TMS) derivative) observed in the present investigation.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g0a4
Figure A5. The representative gas chromatography (GC)–mass spectrometry (MS)-total ion chromatograms (TIC) of phytosterols identified in mustard leaves of various cultivars. IS: internal standard.
Figure A5. The representative gas chromatography (GC)–mass spectrometry (MS)-total ion chromatograms (TIC) of phytosterols identified in mustard leaves of various cultivars. IS: internal standard.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g0a5
Figure A6. The GC-mass spectrum of 7,10,13-hexadecatrienoic acid identified in mustard leaves.
Figure A6. The GC-mass spectrum of 7,10,13-hexadecatrienoic acid identified in mustard leaves.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g0a6

References

  1. Wang, P.Y.; Fang, J.C.; Gao, Z.H.; Zhang, C.; Xie, S.Y. Higher intake of fruits, vegetables or their fiber reduces the risk of type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. J. Diabetes Investig. 2016, 7, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aune, D.; Giovannucci, E.; Boffetta, P.; Fadnes, L.T.; Keum, N.; Norat, T.; Greenwood, D.C.; Riboli, E.; Vatten, L.J.; Tonstad, S. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 1029–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Medina-Remón, A.; Kirwan, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M.; Estruch, R. Dietary patterns and the risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, asthma, and neurodegenerative diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 262–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kaulmann, A.; Bohn, T. Carotenoids, inflammation, and oxidative stress—Implications of cellular signaling pathways and relation to chronic disease prevention. Nutr. Res. 2014, 34, 907–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hajizadeh-Sharafabad, F.; Ghoreishi, Z.; Maleki, V.; Tarighat-Esfanjani, A. Mechanistic insights into the effect of lutein on atherosclerosis, vascular dysfunction, and related risk factors: A systematic review of in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro studies. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 149, 104477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Saini, R.K.; Rengasamy, K.R.R.; Mahomoodally, F.M.; Keum, Y.S. Protective effects of lycopene in cancer, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases: An update on epidemiological and mechanistic perspectives. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 155, 104730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Farnham, M.W.; Lester, G.E.; Hassell, R. Collard, mustard and turnip greens: Effects of genotypes and leaf position on concentrations of ascorbic acid, folate, β-carotene, lutein and phylloquinone. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2012, 27, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xiao, Z.; Lester, G.E.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q. Assessment of Vitamin and Carotenoid Concentrations of Emerging Food Products: Edible Microgreens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7644–7651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, L.-Z.; Sun, J.; Chen, P.; Harnly, J. UHPLC-PDA-ESI/HRMS/MSn Analysis of Anthocyanins, Flavonol Glycosides, and Hydroxycinnamic Acid Derivatives in Red Mustard Greens (Brassica juncea Coss Variety). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 12059–12072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S.; Daglia, M.; Rengasamy, K.R. Dietary carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy: A review of emerging evidence. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 157, 104830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kuhnlein, H.V.; Barthet, V.; Farren, A.; Falahi, E.; Leggee, D.; Receveur, O.; Berti, P. Vitamins A, D, and E in Canadian Arctic traditional food and adult diets. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ungurianu, A.; Zanfirescu, A.; Nițulescu, G.; Margină, D. Vitamin E beyond Its Antioxidant Label. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S. Tocopherols and tocotrienols in plants and their products: A review on methods of extraction, chromatographic separation, and detection. Food Res Int 2016, 82, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jones, P.J. Implementing phytosterols into medical practice as a cholesterol-lowering strategy: Overview of efficacy, effectiveness, and safety. Can. J. Cardiol. 2014, 30, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Regulations, C.o.F. Food Labeling Health Claim; Phytosterols and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease; Proposed Rule; 21 CFR Part 101. Federal Register; Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD, USA, 2010; Volume 75, pp. 76526–76571. [Google Scholar]
  16. Saini, R.K.; Shetty, N.P.; Giridhar, P. GC-FID/MS Analysis of Fatty Acids in Indian Cultivars of Moringa oleifera: Potential Sources of PUFA. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2014, 91, 1029–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, D.E.; Shang, X.; Assefa, A.D.; Keum, Y.S.; Saini, R.K. Metabolite profiling of green, green/red, and red lettuce cultivars: Variation in health beneficial compounds and antioxidant potential. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saini, R.K.; Prasad, P.; Sreedhar, R.V.; Akhilender Naidu, K.; Shang, X.; Keum, Y.S. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs): Emerging Plant and Microbial Sources, Oxidative Stability, Bioavailability, and Health Benefits-A Review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Harbaum, B.; Hubbermann, E.M.; Zhu, Z.J.; Schwarz, K. Free and bound phenolic compounds in leaves of pak choi (Brassica campestris L. ssp chinensis var. communis) and Chinese leaf mustard (Brassica juncea Coss). Food Chem. 2008, 110, 838–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, H.W.; Ko, H.C.; Baek, H.J.; Cho, S.M.; Jang, H.H.; Lee, Y.M.; Kim, J.B. Identification and quantification of glucosinolates in Korean leaf mustard germplasm (Brassica juncea var. integrifolia) by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 1479–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tian, Y.; Deng, F.M. Phytochemistry and biological activity of mustard (Brassica juncea): A review. Cyta-J. Food 2020, 18, 704–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Richards, A.; Wijesundera, C.; Salisbury, P. Genotype and Growing Environment Effects on the Tocopherols and Fatty Acids of Brassica napus and B. juncea. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2008, 85, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S. Significance of Genetic, Environmental, and Pre- and Postharvest Factors Affecting Carotenoid Contents in Crops: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5310–5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Williams, J.P.; Khan, M.U.; Wong, D. Low temperature-induced fatty acid desaturation in Brassica napus: Thermal deactivation and reactivation of the process. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta-Lipids Lipid Metab. 1992, 1128, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Saini, R.K.; Moon, S.H.; Gansukh, E.; Keum, Y.S. An efficient one-step scheme for the purification of major xanthophyll carotenoids from lettuce, and assessment of their comparative anticancer potential. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.-S. Carotenoid extraction methods: A review of recent developments. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cruz, R.; Casal, S.; Mendes, E.; Costa, A.; Santos, C.; Morais, S. Validation of a Single-Extraction Procedure for Sequential Analysis of Vitamin E, Cholesterol, Fatty Acids, and Total Fat in Seafood. Food Anal. Methods 2013, 6, 1196–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Assefa, A.D.; Keum, Y.-S.; Saini, R.K. A comprehensive study of polyphenols contents and antioxidant potential of 39 widely used spices and food condiments. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2018, 12, 1548–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thaipong, K.; Boonprakob, U.; Crosby, K.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Hawkins Byrne, D. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. De Bièvre, P.; Günzler, H. Validation in Chemical Measurement; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  31. Saini, R.K.; Rauf, A.; Khalil, A.A.; Ko, E.-Y.; Keum, Y.-S.; Anwar, S.; Alamri, A.; Rengasamy, K.R.R. Edible mushrooms show significant differences in sterols and fatty acid compositions. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 141, 344–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ahmad, S.I.; Yunus, N.A.; Hashim, H.; Rashid, R. Inherent safety assessment of solvent alternatives for palm oil recovery. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2019, 72, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  33. Frazie, M.D.; Kim, M.J.; Ku, K.-M. Health-Promoting Phytochemicals from 11 Mustard Cultivars at Baby Leaf and Mature Stages. Molecules 2017, 22, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zeb, A. A simple, sensitive HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of carotenoids, chlorophylls and α-tocopherol in leafy vegetables. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2017, 11, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Marti, R.; Rosello, S.; Cebolla-Cornejo, J. Tomato as a Source of Carotenoids and Polyphenols Targeted to Cancer Prevention. Cancers 2016, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Koklesova, L.; Liskova, A.; Samec, M.; Buhrmann, C.; Samuel, S.M.; Varghese, E.; Ashrafizadeh, M.; Najafi, M.; Shakibaei, M.; Busselberg, D.; et al. Carotenoids in Cancer Apoptosis-The Road from Bench to Bedside and Back. Cancers 2020, 12, 2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Saini, R.K.; Prasad, P.; Lokesh, V.; Shang, X.; Shin, J.; Keum, Y.-S.; Lee, J.-H. Carotenoids: Dietary Sources, Extraction, Encapsulation, Bioavailability, and Health Benefits—A Review of Recent Advancements. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 795. [Google Scholar]
  38. Han, J.-H.; Yang, Y.-X.; Feng, M.-Y. Contents of Phytosterols in Vegetables and Fruits Commonly consumed in China. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2008, 21, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S.; Rengasamy, K.R.R. Profiling of nutritionally important metabolites in green/red and green perilla (Perilla frutescens Britt.) cultivars: A comparative study. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 151, 112441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, K.; Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.-S.; Sivanesan, I. Analysis of Lipophilic Antioxidants in the Leaves of Kaempferia parviflora Wall. Ex Baker Using LC–MRM–MS and GC–FID/MS. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, S.; Lim, D.K.; Baek, S.-Y.; Seo, D.; Park, J.-S.; Kwak, B.-M.; Won, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, B. Quantitative analyses of essential fatty acids in cereals and green vegetables by isotope dilution-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saini, R.K.; Shang, X.M.; Ko, E.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, D.; Keum, Y.S. Characterization of nutritionally important phytoconstituents in minimally processed ready-to-eat baby-leaf vegetables using HPLC-DAD and GC-MS. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2016, 10, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mongrand, S.; Bessoule, J.-J.; Cabantous, F.; Cassagne, C. The C16:3\C18:3 fatty acid balance in photosynthetic tissues from 468 plant species. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 1049–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tongur, T.; Erkan, N.; Ayranci, E. Investigation of the composition and antioxidant activity of acetone and methanol extracts of Daphne sericea L. and Daphne gnidioides L. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 1396–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kraujalis, P.; Venskutonis, P.R.; Kraujalienė, V.; Pukalskas, A. Antioxidant Properties and Preliminary Evaluation of Phytochemical Composition of Different Anatomical Parts of Amaranth. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ali, S.S.; Kasoju, N.; Luthra, A.; Singh, A.; Sharanabasava, H.; Sahu, A.; Bora, U. Indian medicinal herbs as sources of antioxidants. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dudonné, S.; Vitrac, X.; Coutière, P.; Woillez, M.; Mérillon, J.-M. Comparative Study of Antioxidant Properties and Total Phenolic Content of 30 Plant Extracts of Industrial Interest Using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC Assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1768–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wiczkowski, W.; Topolska, J.; Honke, J. Anthocyanins profile and antioxidant capacity of red cabbages are influenced by genotype and vegetation period. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 7, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The phenotypic diversity among mustard cultivars used in this investigation.
Figure 1. The phenotypic diversity among mustard cultivars used in this investigation.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g001
Figure 2. LC-single ion monitoring (SIM)-mass spectrometry (MS) chromatograms of carotenoids and α-tocopherol identified and quantified in leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Figure 2. LC-single ion monitoring (SIM)-mass spectrometry (MS) chromatograms of carotenoids and α-tocopherol identified and quantified in leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g002
Figure 3. The representative gas chromatography (GC)-flame ionization detection (FID) chromatograms of fatty acids methyl esters (FAMEs) of leaves of various mustard cultivars. The peak numbers (from 1 to 6) are correspondent to Table 7. * Not a FAME.
Figure 3. The representative gas chromatography (GC)-flame ionization detection (FID) chromatograms of fatty acids methyl esters (FAMEs) of leaves of various mustard cultivars. The peak numbers (from 1 to 6) are correspondent to Table 7. * Not a FAME.
Antioxidants 11 02464 g003
Table 1. LC-MS parameters used for the analysis of carotenoids and tocols.
Table 1. LC-MS parameters used for the analysis of carotenoids and tocols.
HPLC: Nexera 40 Series UHPLC (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan)
ColumnYMC C30 carotenoid column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 μm; YMC, Wilmington, NC)
Column oven temperature20 °C
Mobile phaseA—methanol/water (95/5; v/v) containing 5 mM ammonium formate;
B—methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)/methanol/water (90/7/3, v/v/v), containing 5 mM ammonium formate.
Flow rate0.5 mL/min
Injection volume2 µL
Gradient program0% B (0 min)–100% B (45 min); 5 min post-run (0% B)
MS: LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan)
IonizationAtmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI; Positive)
Nebulizing gas flow3 L/min
Interface temperature400 °C
Drying gas flow10 L/min
DL temperature300 °C
Heat block Temperature300 °C
Corona needle voltage4.0 kv
MS program0.0 min—diverter valve to drain;
8.0 min—diverter valve to MS.
Screening modeSingle ion monitoring (SIM)
Data acquisition (sampling)1.85625 Hz
Q1 resolution±20 ppm
Table 2. Selected ion monitoring (SIM) parameters used for the analysis of carotenoids and tocols.
Table 2. Selected ion monitoring (SIM) parameters used for the analysis of carotenoids and tocols.
Compound ClassCompoundTransition (m/z)
Tocolsδ-tocotrienol397.3113
γ-tocotrienol411.3268
δ-tocotrienol411.3268
α-tocotrienol425.3423
δ-tocopherol402.3488
γ-tocopherol416.3669
δ-tocopherol416.3669
α-tocopherol431.3883
Carotenoids(all-E)-violaxanthin601.4276
9-Z-neoxanthin601.4281
(all-E)-luteoxanthin601.4281
(all-E)-lutein551.4284
(all-E)-zeaxanthin569.4377
(all-E)-β-carotene537.4493
Table 3. GC-FID parameters used for the analysis of fatty acids.
Table 3. GC-FID parameters used for the analysis of fatty acids.
ParametersValue
Injection temperature250 °C
Injection modeSplit (5:1)
Injection volume1 µL
Split flow10 mL/min
Inlet pressure54.901 psi
Inlet total flow15 mL/min
Septum purge flow3 mL/min
Carrier Gas Flow2 mL/min (Nitrogen)
Detector H2 flow30 mL/min
Detector airflow400 mL/min
Detector makeup flow25 mL/min (Nitrogen)
ColumnSP-2560 capillary (100 m, 0.20 μm film thickness, 0.25 mm ID; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
Column oven temperatureRate (°C/min)Final temperature (°C)Hold time (min)
-1401
524015
DetectorFlame ionization detector (FID)
Detector temperature260 °C
Run time45 min
Post run time5 min
Table 4. GC-MS parameters used for the analysis of sterols.
Table 4. GC-MS parameters used for the analysis of sterols.
Gas Chromatograph
Column over temperature150 °C
Injection Temperature260 °C
Injection modesplit
Carrier gasHelium
Flow control modeLiner velocity
Pressure86.5 kPa
Total Flow8.6 mL/min
Column Flow0.93 mL/min
Liner velocity36.7 cm/s
Purge flow3.0 mL/min
ColumnDB-5 ms (30 m, 0. 25 μm film thickness, 0.25 mm ID; Agilent 7890B, Agilent Technologies Canada, Inc
Column oven temperatureRate (°C/min)Final temperature (°C)Hold time (min)
-1501
2030030
Total program time38.5 min
Mass spectrometer
Ion source temperature260 °C
Interface temperature280 °C
Solvent cut time3 min
Start time6 min
End time38 min
Acquiring modeScan
Event time30 s
Scan speed2500
Start m/z50.00
End m/z650.00
Table 5. The contents of carotenoids and α-tocopherol in leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Table 5. The contents of carotenoids and α-tocopherol in leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Compoundscv. Jeok (M1)cv. Cheong (M2)cv. Red Frill (M3)cv. Asia Curled (M4)
(all-E)-violaxanthin22.98 ± 2.98 a23.86 ± 2.45 a10.92 ± 0.92 b22.08 ± 1.99 a
9-Z-neoxanthin10.35 ± 0.03 b12.62 ± 0.92 a12.75 ± 0.75 a12.99 ± 0.07 a
(all-E)-luteoxanthin10.65 ± 0.65 c19.94 ± 1.94 a15.80 ± 1.80 b20.43 ± 2.34 a
(all-E)-lutein53.63 ± 0.38 b59.17 ± 3.22 a52.76 ± 2.76 b50.48 ± 0.85 b
(all-E)-zeaxanthin4.22 ± 0.14 c5.23 ± 0.44 b9.70 ± 0.31 a5.55 ± 0.62 b
(all-E)-β-carotene21.34 ± 0.26 b23.02 ± 0.18 ab21.90 ± 1.90 ab24.45 ± 0.89 a
Total carotenoids123.17 ± 2.80 b143.85 ± 4.25 a123.83 ± 7.82 b135.97 ± 0.16 a
α-tocopherol76.83 ± 5.33 ab83.42 ± 3.36 a68.68 ± 0.81 b67.16 ± 8.48 b
Values (µg/g FW) are the mean ± standard deviation of four replicates. Different superscript letters (i.e., a, b, and c) indicate statistically significant differences among the different cultivars (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD).
Table 6. The phytosterol contents in leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Table 6. The phytosterol contents in leaves of various mustard cultivars.
PhytosterolRT (min)cv. Jeok (M1)cv. Cheong (M2)cv. Red Frill (M3)cv. Asia Curled (M4)
Campesterol18.50949.13 ± 4.79 a53.96 ± 4.86 a30.70 ± 2.71 b36.06 ± 3.31 b
β-Sitosterol20.438201.84 ± 19.2 b240.34 ± 3.76 a151.39 ± 14.1 d174.25 ± 5.16 c
Total phytosterol 250.97 ± 23.8 b294.30 ± 8.52 a182.09 ± 16.4 c210.31 ± 8.21 c
Values (µg/g FW) are mean ± standard deviation of four replicates. RT: retention time. Different superscript letters (i.e., a, b, and c) indicate statistically significant differences among the different cultivars (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD).
Table 7. Fatty acid composition of leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Table 7. Fatty acid composition of leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Peak NoFAMERT (min)cv. Jeok (M1)cv. Cheong (M2)cv. Red Frill (M3)cv. Asia Curled (M4)
1C16:0 (Palmitic)20.9929.01 ± 1.20 b11.09 ± 0.37 a9.18 ± 0.15 b10.82 ± 0.10 a
2C16:3n3 (Hexadecatrienoic acid)24.27032.04 ± 3.25 a27.80 ± 2.50 b32.59 ± 0.74 a27.17 ± 0.60 b
3C18:0 (Stearic)24.6522.13 ± 0.45 a2.25 ± 0.18 a1.56 ± 0.03 b2.28 ± 0.12 a
4C18:1n9c (Oleic)25.74610.57 ± 0.84 b11.67 ± 0.38 a11.33 ± 0.06 ab10.53 ± 0.25 b
5C18:2n6c (Linoleic)27.3348.56 ± 0.88 b11.10 ± 0.43 a8.19 ± 0.10 b10.22 ± 0.10 a
6C18:3n3 (α-Linolenic)29.18037.68 ± 0.28 b36.09 ± 1.23 c37.14 ± 0.43 bc38.98 ± 0.29 a
∑SFAs 11.15 ± 1.37 b13.34 ± 0.53 a10.74 ± 0.16 b13.10 ± 0.06 a
∑PUFAs 78.28 ± 2.19 a74.99 ± 0.88 b77.93 ± 0.21 a76.37 ± 0.25 ab
∑n-3 PUFAs 69.72 ± 3.06 a63.89 ± 1.29 b69.74 ± 0.31 a66.15 ± 0.31 b
∑PUFAs/∑SFAs 7.12 ± 1.07 a5.63 ± 0.29 b7.26 ± 0.13 a5.83 ± 0.03 b
Values (mean ± standard deviation) are percentages of the total fatty acids from four determinations. FAME: fatty acid methyl ester; RT: retention time; PUFAs: total polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFAs: total saturated fatty acids. Different superscript letters (i.e., a, b, and c) indicate statistically significant differences among the different cultivars (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD).
Table 8. The antioxidant activity of leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Table 8. The antioxidant activity of leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Antioxidant Assaycv. Jeok (M1)cv. Cheong (M2)cv. Red Frill (M3)cv. Asia Curled (M4)
ABTS•+ activity 1535.67 ± 21.28 c580.44 ± 22.35 b640.66 ± 19.14 a515.49 ± 6.62 c
ABTS•+ activity 2133.14 ± 4.72 b148.27 ± 3.31 a133.48 ± 4.11 b100.73 ± 3.15 c
DPPH activity 1192.89 ± 6.48 c243.14 ± 1.29 b284.96 ± 10.96 a170.20 ± 2.12 d
DPPH activity 263.74 ± 4.74 bc74.95 ± 3.40 b80.76 ± 2.94 a60.23 ± 2.56 c
Values (mg of Trolox equivalent/100 g FW) are mean ± standard deviation of four replicates. Different superscript letters (i.e., a, b, and c) indicate statistically significant differences among the different cultivars (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD). 1 Activity from 80% methanolic extract (v/v); 2 Antioxidant activity from lipophilic extract prepared using acetone/ethanol/cyclohexane (1:1:2, v/v).
Table 9. The correlation coefficient (R) between total carotenoids, α-tocopherol, and phytosterol contents and the antioxidant potential of leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Table 9. The correlation coefficient (R) between total carotenoids, α-tocopherol, and phytosterol contents and the antioxidant potential of leaves of various mustard cultivars.
Total Carotenoidsα-TocopherolTotal PhytosterolABTS•+ Activity 1ABTS•+ Activity 2DPPH Activity 1DPPH Activity 2
Total carotenoids1.000
α-tocopherol0.4541.000
Total phytosterol0.6090.9491.000
ABTS•+ activity 1−0.226−0.002−0.2861.000
ABTS•+ activity 20.0690.7960.5670.5741.000
DPPH activity 1−0.1410.116−0.1680.9920.6571.000
DPPH activity 2−0.0500.180−0.0940.9780.6870.9951.000
1 Antioxidant activity from 80% methanolic extract (v/v); 2 antioxidant activity from lipophilic extract prepared using acetone/ethanol/cyclohexane (1:1:2, v/v).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saini, R.K.; Yu, J.-W.; Song, M.-H.; Ahn, H.-Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Keum, Y.-S.; Lee, J.-H. Profiling of Redox-Active Lipophilic Constituents in Leaf Mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.) Cultivars Using LC-MS and GC-MS. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11122464

AMA Style

Saini RK, Yu J-W, Song M-H, Ahn H-Y, Lee J-H, Keum Y-S, Lee J-H. Profiling of Redox-Active Lipophilic Constituents in Leaf Mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.) Cultivars Using LC-MS and GC-MS. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(12):2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11122464

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saini, Ramesh Kumar, Ji-Woo Yu, Min-Ho Song, Hui-Yeon Ahn, Jung-Hoon Lee, Young-Soo Keum, and Ji-Ho Lee. 2022. "Profiling of Redox-Active Lipophilic Constituents in Leaf Mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.) Cultivars Using LC-MS and GC-MS" Antioxidants 11, no. 12: 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11122464

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop