Next Article in Journal
Reduced Fitness and Elevated Oxidative Stress in the Marine Copepod Tigriopus japonicus Exposed to the Toxic Dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi
Previous Article in Journal
Gold Nanoparticles Supported on Ceria Nanoparticles Modulate Leukocyte–Endothelium Cell Interactions and Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/antiox11112298
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Impact of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) on Tuberculosis (TB) Patients—A Systematic Review

by
Daniel Adon Mapamba
1,2,*,
Elingarami Sauli
2,
Lucy Mrema
1,
Julieth Lalashowi
1,
David Magombola
1,
Joram Buza
2,
Willyhelmina Olomi
1,
Robert S. Wallis
3 and
Nyanda Elias Ntinginya
1,*
1
National Institute for Medical Research-Mbeya Medical Research Center, Mbeya 53107, Tanzania
2
The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha 23118, Tanzania
3
The Aurum Institute, 535 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(11), 2298; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112298
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 9 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sustained TB infection overproduces reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a host defense mechanism. Research shows ROS is destructive to lung tissue. Glutathione (GSH) neutralizes ROS, although it is consumed. NAC is a precursor of GSH synthesis, and administering an appropriate dose of NAC to patients with respiratory conditions may enhance lung recovery and replenish GSH. The present review searched for articles reporting on the effects of NAC in TB treatment from 1960 to 31 May 2022. The PICO search strategy was used in Google Scholar, PubMed, SciFinder, and Wiley online library databases. The COVIDENCE tool was used to delete inappropriate content. We eventually discovered five clinical trials, one case report, seven reviews, in vitro research, and four experimental animal studies from the twenty-four accepted articles. The use of NAC resulted in increased GSH levels, decreased treatment time, and was safe with minimal adverse events. However, the evidence is currently insufficient to estimate the overall effects of NAC, thus the study warrants more NAC clinical trials to demonstrate its effects in TB treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in people with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary forms of the disease, and has only recently been surpassed by the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. The pandemic has compromised the TB control program, including both human and financial resources for the fight against TB, as the results dropped between 2019 and 2021 [1]. Despite well-established and widely-publicized methods of prevention and treatment, the TB disease still affects people all over the world. The main causes of its persistence include HIV infection and poverty. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that there were 10.6 million incident TB cases and 1.6 million fatalities in 2021 [1]. Additionally, it has been observed that 85% of reported cases of TB are successfully treated [2]. Despite an apparent microbiologic cure, studies have shown that TB patients with a follow-up of at least 24 months still have some sort of persistent pulmonary impairment [3]. According to Ravimohan et al., (2018), pulmonary tuberculosis is a risk factor for long-term lung impairment and yet is frequently overlooked despite its high prevalence and link to a lower quality of life [4].
Sustained TB infection elicits an immunological process whereby the cellular immune response by alveolar macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils as first-line defending cells acts on M. tb by engulfing, processing, and presenting peptides to naïve T cells that differentiate into T helper 1 cells (Th1), which undergo maturation and produce interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and activate macrophages and neutrophils to produce anti-microbial peptides including the reactive oxygen species (ROS), tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α), and induced nitrogen species (iNOS) as part of the defense mechanism [5,6]. However, excessive production of ROS destroys lung tissues through the oxidation process [7,8].
Glutathione (GSH) is a non-protein thiol consisting of a tripeptide of glycine, cysteine, and glutamic acid, which are produced naturally by body cells. GSH has been found to be a free radical scavenger [9]. GSH has also been shown to protect against ROS and reactive nitrogen species by neutralizing free radicals and converting them into oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and water (2GSH + O-GSSG + H2O), a reaction that consumes GSH [10,11,12]. Cysteine amino acid as a precursor to GSH synthesis is required. Although it is considered conditionally essential, human synthetic capacity and dietary content are also limited.
NAC is a synthetic form of cysteine, a sulfur-containing amino acid that is temperature stable, a supplement required to replenish GSH [13]. It has been used routinely in the treatment of acetaminophen toxicity, which protects against fatal liver injuries [14]. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate and identify the use of NAC as a drug supplement in the treatment of several diseases, including the recent COVID-19 pandemic. NAC is a mucolytic and antioxidant drug is found to reduce the viscosity of the sputum, clean the bronchi, help to relieve dyspnea, and improve lung function [15,16]. Researchers went further to evaluate the effects of NAC against microbial activity and anti-TB drug effects during and after TB treatment [17,18,19,20]. The current review looked at study designs, methods, countries of origin, benefits for TB patients, Adverse events, and immunological responses. The review’s second goal was to identify the in vivo and in vitro study designs conducted to assess the effects of NAC on TB disease progression, including treatment reduction, sputum culture conversion rate, lung function, and GSH expression.

1.1. What Is Already Known on This Topic?

NAC serves as a precursor for GSH biosynthesis. The product was approved by the WHO for the treatment of acetaminophen intoxication. Studies are researching the product’s potential to treat a number of illnesses, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, TB, COPD, chronic bronchitis, and others.

1.2. What Does This Present Study Add?

The present review has found that few studies have been conducted to find out the effects of NAC in TB treatment and therefore highlights the importance of conducting more clinical trials on the use of NAC in TB treatment in order to demonstrate the general effect of adjunctive NAC in TB treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

The present systematic review was conducted by using a systematical literature search for all available NAC articles in the databases. Search terms were created following the population, concepts, and context (PCC) format. We categorized our review title into two parts, whereas the–“TB patients’ treatment” part of the research title was categorized as population, “the effect of adjunctive NAC” part was categorized as an intervention. The first group comprised search terms related to population targeting:
“tuberculosis treatment”[All Fields] OR “lung cavitation”[All Fields] OR “lung exacerbations” [All Fields] OR “COPD”[All Fields] OR “Respiratory problems”[All Fields] OR “lung impairment”[All Fields] OR “lung disorder” [All Fields] OR “interferon gamma”[MeSH] OR “inflammatory cytokines”[All Fields] OR “ROS”[All Fields] OR “Reactive oxygen-species”[All Fields] OR “lung inflammation”[All Fields] OR “Tuberculosis-disease”[All Fields] OR “lung-TB”[All Fields] OR “Standard anti-TB” OR “TB regimen”[All Fields] OR “relapse TB”[All Fields] OR “host-directed therapy”[All Fields].
The Cysteine group comprised the intervention concepts for the TB disease. The search terms were:
“GSH”[All Fields] AND “pulmonary-TB”[All Fields] OR (“Antioxidant”[All Fields] OR “Glutathione”[All Fields]) OR “pulmonary tuberculosis”[All Fields] OR “COPD”[All Fields] AND “TB”[All Fields] OR “pulmonary-tb”[All Fields] OR “Cysteine”[All Fields] OR “NAC”[All Fields] OR “acetyl-cysteine”[All Fields] OR “Precursor”[All Fields] OR “n-acetyl cysteine”[All Fields] OR “N-acetyl-cysteine”[All Fields] OR “Sulfur-containing”[All Fields] OR “Amino-acid”[All Fields] OR (“adjunct”[All Fields] OR “TB-treatment”[All Fields] OR “adjunctive”[All Fields] OR “replenish-GSH”[All Fields] OR “NAC impact”[All Fields] OR “NAC effects”[All Fields] OR “NAC-supplement”[All Fields]) OR “non-thiol”[All Fields] OR “Cysteine”[All Fields] OR “N-Acetyl cysteine”[All Fields] OR “Glycine”[All Fields] OR “cysteine”[MeSH Terms] OR “glutamine”[All Fields] OR “glutamic acid”[All Fields] OR “Hepatotoxicity”[All Fields] OR “DiLI”[All Fields].
We conducted a search of the identified terms in PubMed, Google Scholar, SciFinder, and Wiley online library databases. Each group of search terms were identified either in Abstracts, Free Full Text, full text, books and documents, case reports, clinical studies, clinical trials, in phase 1–4, clinical trial protocols, comparative studies, Meta-Analysis, observational studies, randomized controlled trials, research support, US Government, Reviews and systematic Reviews, and human subjects. We identified 42,205 results in the first group (as a population) and 113,106 results from the second group (as an intervention). Further searching using #1AND#2 was done by combining the results of the population and an intervention, as identified above. The initial database searches were performed on 12 April 2022, and updated on 31 May 2022. Twenty-four studies were selected for full-text review based on the abstracts obtained by this search approach. In addition, we looked through the reference lists of all the papers and reviews we obtained to see if there were any other studies that were relevant prior to data extraction. The articles included reported on clinical trials: randomized, double-blind or open-label, placebo-controlled, prospective, pilot, and case studies of oral, inhalation, and intravenous NAC supplementation taken on a regular basis during the course of TB treatment. We also included experimental studies investigating the in vitro effects of NAC on the harvested cells, either from humans or experimental animals, and studies conducted in the trial of NAC used in combination with other approved drugs. Review articles on the effects of NAC were included in this review as well see (Tables 1–4). We excluded trials of NAC conducted in other diseases apart from TB. See (Figure 1).
The present review work was not registered, and the protocol was not prepared.
The primary outcome measures of the review were to evaluate clinical trials on the effects of NAC on the progression of TB disease, such as improved lung function, sputum culture conversion, increased levels of GSH expression, and changes in cytokine production, specifically IL-10 and TNF-α. NAC supplement dosage and treatment duration were also assessed. The secondary outcome measures were to determine whether a protective effect or adverse event resulted from the course of NAC usage during and/or after TB treatment.

Statistical Methods

Unadjusted meta-analyses were conducted for each intervention, comparison group, and outcome using a random effect model in STATA software (version 16, STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, 4905 Lakeway Drive, USA). Relative risk was used when the outcome was culture conversion, and risk difference was used when the outcomes were adverse events. I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity between studies. The values of I2 statistics greater than 50% represented high heterogeneity. For all analyses, the p-value for statistical significance was set at 0.05.

3. Results

After searching 37 citations and 8035 full-text papers, and by removing the duplicates and irrelevant articles using the Covidence tool, 207 articles were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 24 articles were included, of which 1 article was not yet published but rather was an accepted manuscript. The articles were searched from 1960, when NAC use began, until 2022. Of the identified and included articles, 100% were disseminated after 2004, 53.8% of the articles were published between 2016 and 2020, and 19.2% of the articles were already published from 2021 to 31st May 2022. Most of the articles were reported from North America (34.8%) and (13.04%) reported from Brazil or Iran. Furthermore, 8.7% of the identified articles are from the United Kingdom, India, South Africa, and China separately. Five (20.8%) of the identified articles were clinical trials, seven (29.2%) were systematic literature reviews or in vitro study designs, four (16.7%) were experimental animal model designed studies, and one (4.2%) was a case report. Almost all articles found that the NAC replenished GSH, which boosted host immunological function and improved TB treatment, including lung function and reduced time to sputum culture positivity, with minimal or minor side effects; see (Figure 1) and (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4).

3.1. Data Charting

The data charting process was completed after data extraction conducted by the use of the online COVIDENCE program tool, which was freely offered to be used by the organization team. The tools automatically identify duplicates and ease the data extraction process.
Details of articles included in review (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4).
Table 1 presents the in vitro studies that were carried out to assess the effect of NAC on TB.
Table 2 presents studies using experimental animal models to examine the effect of NAC on TB.
Table 3 presents clinical trials and a case study that was done to assess the impact of NAC on TB.
Table 4 presents studies on NAC’s impact on TB.

3.2. NAC Effect on Sputum Culture Conversion

Understanding NAC’s mucolytic property and that it may have an effect on microbial activity, the review looked into studies that reported on the effect of NAC in TB, with a focus on sputum culture conversion. We found two studies from Mahakalkar et al. [17] and Safe I.P [19], which both looked into the effect of NAC on sputum culture conversion (Table 5). The forest plot from two studies on the use of NAC in TB is shown below.
Table 5 presents sputum culture conversion from two studies. The overall effect of the NAC intervention group was not significantly different from the control, with a pooled RR of 1.10 and a 95% CI of 0.98–1.23. As for the heterogeneity between the studies, since the I2 is 0%, this suggests no important heterogeneity was observed between studies. Although the Mahakalkar paper reported that in the NAC group, 23 patients achieved sputum negativity in three weeks, while 14 patients were in the PLACEBO group and Safe. P reported 11 (61.1%) patients in the NAC group had a negative culture at week 8, while only 7 (33.3%) were in the control group.

3.3. Adverse Events of NAC in TB Subjects

NAC has been investigated as a supplementary drug for patients and reduces hepatotoxicity. The present review identified mild adverse events that were reported by Izabella P. Safe et al. [31], including nausea, vomiting, and hepatotoxicity. However, the article reported that up to 30% patients were experiencing hepatotoxicity are living with HIV, and the infection appeared to be one of the risk factors. Baniasadi et al. [29] reported that NAC protects against drug-induced hepatotoxicity caused by the standard anti-TB drugs therapy (INH, RIF, and PZA combination) in elderly populations. Again, milder adverse events were reported in a case study by Fox et al [32], Oral NAC was associated with nausea and vomiting, suggesting further investigation in clinical trials being required. Three studies identified by Kranzer et al. [34] reported that NAC reduced ototoxicity in 146 patients with end-stage renal failure receiving aminoglycosides, while eighty-three studies described how the administration of NAC for more than 6 weeks increased abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and arthralgia in 1.4–2.2 times. The meta-analysis from three studies were conducted to evaluate the adverse events was represented by a forest plot below (Table 6).
Table 6 presents adverse events between the control and NAC groups from three studies. The results showed a risk difference between the two groups with a 95% CI of −0.03 (95% CI: −0.42–0.35), although there was significant inter-study heterogeneity.

3.4. Immunological Responses

A pilot study conducted by Guerra et al. examined the effects of NAC (alone and in combination with IL-2 and IL-12) on up-regulating NK cell cytotoxic receptors and determined the levels of GSH in NK cells derived from HIV-positive, as well as the survival of H37Rv M. tb strain in monocytes cultured in the presence of NK cells (both from HIV-positive individuals). Findings treating NK cells with IL-2, IL-12, and NAC, inhibited the growth of H37Rv. When combined with GSH, it improved the ability of NK cells to control M. tb infection. Lin et al [21]. discovered that NAC inhibits the expression of TNF-α and caspase-9 genes as well as the translation of apoptotic proteins. Also Venketaraman et al. (2008) [24] showed that NAC decreased the levels of IL-10, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1 in blood cultures derived from TB patients and also showed the efficient control of intracellular M. tb infection in blood cultures derived from healthy subjects compared to TB patients.

3.5. GSH Expression Levels

We also looked into the effect of NAC on GSH expression. Two studies conducted by Mahakalkar et al. (2017) [17] in a clinical trial to investigate the effect of NAC on the production of glutathione peroxidase, an enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation and dimerization of GSH. The finding was that 600 mg NAC taken twice a day significantly raised Glutathione Peroxidase levels. A clinical study by Safe. P. et al. [31] measured the effect of 600 mg NAC taken twice a day on the GSH expression study found GSH levels were elevated only in RIPENAC patients at 60 days compared to levels found at the baseline. Furthermore, GSH levels were higher in RIPENAC patients compared to the RIPE group at day 60. It has been observed that NAC enhanced GSH levels by 2-fold in the RIPENAC group compared to the control at 60 days of treatment. It is possible that restoring GSH may negatively impact other markers, as the generation of ROS has been proposed as a mechanism of action for both macrophages and TB drugs. The current study did not explain how this effect will translate to clinical outcomes.

3.6. Lung Function

TB disease impairs normal lung function, and the effect persists even after the microbiological cure [3]. In several studies on lung disease, spirometry is the gold standard for measuring airway obstruction [5]. Researchers have reported that half of TB survivors present with some form of lung impairment [3,40]. NAC is now used as a food supplement and some clinical trials have investigated the role played by NAC in improving lung function impaired during TB infection. Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) has been very extensively studied in this regard; even small decreases in FEV1 are associated with increased standardized mortality risks. Conversely, there is a known long-term FEV1 benefit and a possible short-term benefit from treatment shortening. It is also possible that only some patients will benefit from NAC. The present review did not identify any studies or research on the use of NAC in improving lung outcomes in TB patients.

4. Discussion

A meta-analysis was performed from five identified clinical trials following similarities in their objectives and/or variation in study outcomes between studies. Two studies looked into the effect of NAC on sputum culture conversion, three studies investigated adverse events associated with the use of NAC, and three of the studies also looked into the effect of NAC on GSH expression levels. The findings from these clinical trials were presented with a clinical meaning based on the outcomes. The importance of NAC usage in TB is clear, and this adds to the current knowledge in the field by demonstrating that NAC may be a relevant candidate for adjunct therapy in TB. However, there is a need for multicenter clinical trials to study the effects of NAC, long-term follow-up investigations of TB subjects, and studies of NAC in multi-drug resistant TB. The use of a higher NAC dose and an investigation of its effects on teenagers may be an advantageous move to advocate the usefulness of NAC as a drug supplement.

4.1. Mechanism of NAC

In vitro and in vivo data have shown that NAC can protect the lungs against toxic agents by increasing pulmonary defense mechanisms through its direct antioxidant properties and as a precursor of GSH synthesis, [41,42,43,44]. which is depleted in patients with M. tb. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments have demonstrated that oxidative stress, which is increased in M. tb infection, may contribute to pathological abnormalities and functional changes in the lungs [45]. Increased ROS are common in M. tb infection and have been shown to reduce the synthesis of elastin and collagen [46]. Increased levels of ROS may also increase IL-1, IL-8, prostaglandins, and leukotriene production in several cell systems [47]. Finally, oxidative stress activates the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa-beta (NF-kb), which switches on the genes for TNF-alpha and all other inflammatory proteins [5]. In vitro, NAC acts as a precursor for GSH because it can penetrate cells easily and is subsequently deacylated to deliver cysteine [48]. The sulfydryl group from cysteine neutralizes external and internal toxic agents, such as NO, cellular aerobic respiration, inflammatory cytokines, and the metabolism of phagocytes [48]. NAC has shown potential function in immunological function, reducing hepatotoxicity, improvement of depleted GSH, sputum culture conversion rate, and other functions; however, the mechanisms underlying therapeutic and clinical applications are unknown [49]. Most studies have reported milder adverse events when administered orally compared to other routes of administration, compared to I.V route of NAC administration oral routepresents with nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, generally anti TB therapy have been reported with Drug Induced Hepatotoxicity (DIH) and Drug induced liver injury (DiLI) effect to the TB opatients, it is Plausible that adjunctive NAC may countereffect the resulted and reported A’E.

4.2. Effect of NAC on Microbial Activity

Sputum culture conversion is used as a microbiological end time point in clinical trials during TB treatment [49,50]. The most common factors that affect time to sputum culture conversion include multidrug resistance, HIV co-infection, previous alcohol drinking, high baseline sputum smear grading, number of resistant drugs at initiation, number of active drugs taken, and delaying treatment for more than one month [51,52]. Salindri et al. [53] also pointed out that diabetes affects time to culture conversion in newly diagnosed MDR-TB patients [53,54]. In a prospective, randomized, parallel group by Mahakalkar et al. [17] in vivo early sputum negativity achieved by the addition of NAC to the standard TB drugs in a prospective, randomized, and parallel fashion was reported. Safe P et al. [31] found that NAC was associated with faster sputum negativity, improved radiological response, and improvement in weight. The rate of change of TTP has been proposed as a marker of drug antimicrobial activity. Regimes that show faster culture conversion values seem likely candidates for shorter durations. Shorter regimens will have a more rapid effect on these markers, but this is not well established.
Three studies used 400 mg/kg—which is equivalent to a 32.4 mg/kg human dose—of NAC in animal model design to study its effects on TB. These research findings provide evidence that the in vivo use of adjunctive NAC against TB with optimal dosage can affect the microbial activity of M. tb by boosting host immunological function, including the replenishment of GSH, or may directly affect M. tb growth [8,16,23,24]. The use of NAC in TB patients may impact the pathogen’s survival as well as improve lung function in the patient if the adjunctive NAC is taken at optimal dosage.
Blood samples from healthy and TB subjects were used in in vitro investigations by Venketaraman et al. [24] who found that H37Rv growth was nearly two times higher in healthy subjects. In contrast, the H37Rv strain’s growth was inhibited when blood cultures were treated with NAC (10 mM). However, the benefits of NAC in inducing the growth control of H37Rv were reversed when buthionine sulphoximine (BSO) (500 mM) was used. BSO is a sulfoximine derivative that suppresses glutathione levels [41,43]. The compound inhibits gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase, the enzyme needed for the initial stage of glutathione biosynthesis. The discovery of the compound is a significant new technique for highlighting the activity of glutathione in vivo [55,56]. The experiment demonstrated the significant role of NAC in both the regulation of M. tb proliferation and the expression of GSH. However, there is insufficient data to support the antioxidants NAC and GSH’s in vivo effects.

5. Limitations of the Review Process

The present review was limited with few searched articles related to the question, and it was difficult to conclude and recommend the effectiveness of NAC to the pathogen as well as to the host.

6. Conclusions

Our review could not come to the best conclusion about the effect of NAC on TB treatment due to the limited literature available on the use of NAC in TB subjects. Therefore, this review warrants more clinical trials on the use of NAC to demonstrate the effects of NAC. The ongoing TB-SEQUEL-NAC study in Tanzania, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 03702738, aims to evaluate clinical trials on the effect of NAC in TB treatment using a higher dose of 1200 mg BID of NAC in patients with TB, with and without HIV co-infection. It is plausible that the study would add evidence to support the use of NAC as a drug supplement in TB treatment.

7. Recommendation

Our review shows that NAC has a modest but significant effect on increased intracellular GSH expression rates and decreased inflammatory cytokines in TB patients and thus improves post-TB lung disease. However, due to limited clinical trials on NAC, this present review therefore points to the need for more clinical studies on the use of NAC during TB treatment or the treatment of other respiratory diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S., J.B. and N.E.N.; methodology, L.M., J.L. and D.M.; formal analysis, W.O.; investigation, R.S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.M.; writing—review and editing, R.S.W., E.S. and J.B.; supervision, R.S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review work was financially supported by the TB sequel project (LMU-IMPH-TB Sequel-01), which is funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research and is part of the initiative Research Networks for Health Innovations in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the TB Sequel Consortium for their funding support, the NIMR-Mbeya Medical Research Leadership, including the TB Lab Science and TB and Emerging Disease Departments leaders, for their assistance, and the Covidence Leadership for providing a free data extraction tool. We also thank the Nelson Mandela Institute of Science and Technology’s School of Life Science leaders for their guidance in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Global Tuberculosis Report 2022. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061729 (accessed on 13 August 2022).
  2. WHO. Global TB Report 2020; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hnizdo, E.; Singh, T.; Churchyard, G. Chronic pulmonary function impairment caused by initial and recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis following treatment. Thorax 2000, 55, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ravimohan, S.; Kornfeld, H.; Weissman, D.; Bisson, G.P. Tuberculosis and lung damage: From epidemiology to pathophysiology. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2018, 27, 170077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Rahman, I.; MacNee, W. Oxidative Stress and Regulation of GSH in Lung Inflammation. Eur. Respir. J. 2000, 16, 534–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lamichhane, G.; Hopkins, J. The response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hecker, L. Mechanisms and consequences of oxidative stress in lung disease: Therapeutic implications for an aging populace. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2018, 314, L642–L653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silvagno, F.; Vernone, A.; Pescarmona, G.P. The Role of Glutathione in Protecting against the Severe Inflammatory Response Triggered by COVID-19. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Galano, A.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J.R. Glutathione: Mechanism and Kinetics of Its Non-Enzymatic Defense Action against Free Radicals. RSC Adv. 2011, 1, 1763–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ulrich, K.; Jakob, U. The role of thiols in antioxidant systems. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 140, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fagan, R.L.; Palfey, B.A. Flavin-Dependent Enzymes. In Comprehensive Natural Products II, 1st ed.; Mander, L., Liu, H.-W., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 37–113. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fanucchi, M.V. Pulmonary Developmental Responses to Toxicants. In Comprehensive Toxicology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 8, pp. 199–221. [Google Scholar]
  13. Venketaraman, V.; Dayaram, Y.K.; Amin, A.G.; Ngo, R.; Green, R.M.; Talaue, M.T.; Mann, J.; Connell, N.D. Role of Glutathione in Macrophage Control of Mycobacteria. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 1864–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Prescott, L.F.; Critchley, J.A.J.H.; Proudfoot, A.T.; Illingworth, R.N.; Stewart, M.J.; Adam, R.D. Intravenous N-acetylcysteine: The treatment of choice for paracetamol poisoning. Br. Med. J. 1979, 2, 1097–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, X.; Wei, X.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, D.; Hei, Z.; Yao, W. N-Acetylcysteine Inhalation Improves Pulmonary Function in Patients Received Liver Transplantation. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38, BSR20180858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sadowska, A.M.; Verbraecken, J.; Darquennes, K.; de Backer, W.A. Role of N-acetylcysteine in the management of COPD. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2006, 2, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mahakalkar, S.; Nagrale, D.; Gaur, S.; Urade, C.; Murhar, B.; Turankar, A. N-acetylcysteine as an add-on to Directly Observed Therapy Short-I therapy in fresh pulmonary tuberculosis patients: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2017, 8, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Vilchèze, C.; Jacobs, W.R. The Promises and Limitations of N -Acetylcysteine as a Potentiator of First-Line and Second-Line Tuberculosis Drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Safe, I.P.; Lacerda, M.V.G.; Printes, V.S.; Marins, A.F.P.; Rabelo, A.L.R.; Costa, A.A.; Tavares, M.A.; Jesus, J.S.; Souza, A.B.; Beraldi-Magalhães, F.; et al. Safety and efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in hospitalized patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis: An open-label, randomized, phase II trial (RIPENACTB Study). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Amaral, E.P.; Conceição, E.L.; Costa, D.L.; Rocha, M.S.; Marinho, J.M.; Cordeiro-Santos, M.; D’Império-Lima, M.R.; Barbosa, T.; Sher, A.; Andrade, B.B. N-acetyl-cysteine exhibits potent anti-mycobacterial activity in addition to its known anti-oxidative functions. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Lin, X.; Wei, M.; Song, F.; Xue, D.; Wang, Y. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) attenuating apoptosis and autophagy in RAW264.7 cells in response to incubation with mycolic acid from bovine mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Coleman, M.D.; Khan, N.; Welton, G.; Lambert, P.A.; Tims, K.J.; Rathbone, D.L. Effects of glutathione, N-acetyl-cysteine, α-lipoic acid and dihydrolipoic acid on the cytotoxicity of a 2-pyridylcarboxamidrazone antimycobacterial agent in human mononuclear leucocytes in vitro. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2004, 17, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Venketaraman, V.; Rodgers, T.; Linares, R.; Reilly, N.; Swaminathan, S.; Hom, D.; Millman, A.C.; Wallis, R.; Connell, N.D. Glutathione and growth inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in healthy and HIV infected subjects. AIDS Res. Ther. 2006, 3, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Venketaraman, V.; Millman, A.; Salman, M.; Swaminathan, S.; Goetz, M.; Lardizabal, A.; Hom, D.; Connell, N.D. Glutathione levels and immune responses in tuberculosis patients. Microb. Pathog. 2008, 44, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Teskey, G.; Cao, R.; Islamoglu, H.; Medina, A.; Prasad, C.; Prasad, R.; Sathananthan, A.; Fraix, M.; Subbian, S.; Zhong, L.; et al. The Synergistic Effects of the Glutathione Precursor, NAC and First-Line Antibiotics in the Granulomatous Response Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Khameneh, B.; Bazzaz, B.S.F.; Amani, A.; Rostami, J.; Vahdati-Mashhadian, N. Combination of anti-tuberculosis drugs with vitamin C or NAC against different Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 93, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guerra, C.; Johal, K.; Morris, D.; Moreno, S.; Alvarado, O.; Gray, D.; Tanzil, M.; Pearce, D.; Venketaraman, V. Control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth by activated natural killer cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2011, 168, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Palanisamy, G.S.; Kirk, N.M.; Ackart, D.F.; Shanley, C.A.; Orme, I.M.; Basaraba, R.J. Evidence for Oxidative Stress and Defective Antioxidant Response in Guinea Pigs with Tuberculosis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Baniasadi, S.; Eftekhari, P.; Tabarsi, P.; Fahimi, F.; Raoufy, M.R.; Masjedi, M.; Velayati, A.A. Protective effect of N-acetylcysteine on antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 22, 1235–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Moosa, M.S.; Maartens, G.; Gunter, H.; Allie, S.; Chughlay, M.F.; Setshedi, M.; Wasserman, S.; Stead, D.F.; Hickman, N.; Stewart, A.; et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine in the Management of Anti-tuberculosis Drug–Induced Liver Injury. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 73, e3377–e3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Safe, I.P.; Amaral, E.P.; Araújo-Pereira, M.; Lacerda, M.V.G.; Printes, V.S.; Souza, A.B.; Beraldi-Magalhães, F.; Monteiro, W.M.; Sampaio, V.S.; Barreto-Duarte, B.; et al. Adjunct N-acetylcysteine treatment in hospitalized patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis dampens the oxidative stress in peripheral blood: Results from the RIPENACTB Study trial. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 602589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fox, A.N.; Nation, B.E.; Autry, M.T.; Johnson, P.N. Possible role for acetylcysteine as a treatment for acute liver failure secondary to antitubercular medication use. Am. J. Health Pharm. 2020, 77, 1482–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Atkuri, K.R.; Mantovani, J.J.; Herzenberg, L.A. N-Acetylcysteine—A safe antidote for cysteine/glutathione deficiency. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2007, 7, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kranzer, K.; Elamin, W.F.; Cox, H.; Seddon, J.A.; Ford, N.; Drobniewski, F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety ofN-acetylcysteine in preventing aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity: Implications for the treatment of multidrug-resistant TB. Thorax 2015, 70, 1070–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mokhtari, V.; Afsharian, P.; Shahhoseini, M.; Kalantar, M.; Moini, A. A Review on Various Uses of N-Acetyl Cysteine. Cell J. 2017, 19, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Ejigu, D.A.; Abay, S.M. N-Acetyl Cysteine as an Adjunct in the Treatment of Tuberculosis. Tuberc. Res. Treat. 2020, 2020, 5907839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Young, C.; Walzl, G.; Du Plessis, N. Therapeutic host-directed strategies to improve outcome in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2020, 13, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Schwalfenberg, G.K. N-Acetylcysteine: A Review of Clinical Usefulness (an Old Drug with New Tricks). J. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 2021, 9949453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tenório, M.C.d.S.; Graciliano, N.G.; Moura, F.; de Oliveira, A.C.M.; Goulart, M.O.F. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC): Impacts on Human Health. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Conrad, C.; Lymp, J.; Thompson, V.; Dunn, C.; Davies, Z.; Chatfield, B.; Nichols, D.; Clancy, J.; Vender, R.; Egan, M.E.; et al. Long-term treatment with oral N-acetylcysteine: Affects lung function but not sputum inflammation in cystic fibrosis subjects. A phase II randomized placebo-controlled trial. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2015, 14, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Lee, H.O.; Byun, Y.J.; Cho, K.O.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, S.B.; Kim, H.S.; Kwon, O.J.; Jeong, S.W. GS28 Protects Neuronal Cell Death Induced by Hydrogen Peroxide under Glutathione-Depleted Condition. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2011, 15, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Dringen, R.; Pfeiffer, B.; Hamprecht, B. Synthesis of the Antioxidant Glutathione in Neurons: Supply by Astrocytes of CysGly as Precursor for Neuronal Glutathione. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Franco, R.; Schoneveld, O.J.; Pappa, A.; Panayiotidis, M.I. The Central Role of Glutathione in the Pathophysiology of Human Diseases. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 113, 234–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Palmen, N.G.M.; Evelo, C.T.A. Glutathione depletion in human erythrocytes as an indicator for microsomal activation of cyclophosphamide and 3-hydroxyacetanilide. Toxicology 1993, 84, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rahman, I.; MacNee, W. Role of oxidants/antioxidants in smoking-induced lung diseases. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1996, 21, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oxidants, Antioxidants and the Pathogenesis of Emphysema—PubMed. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2995106/ (accessed on 13 August 2022).
  47. Metinko, A.P.; Kunkel, S.L.; Standiford, T.J.; Strieter, R.M. Anoxia-hyperoxia induces monocyte-derived interleukin-8. J. Clin. Investig. 1992, 90, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Dekhuijzen, P.N.R.; Van Beurden, W.J.C. The role for N-acetylcysteine in the management of COPD. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2006, 1, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Samuni, Y.; Goldstein, S.; Dean, O.M.; Berk, M. The chemistry and biological activities of N-acetylcysteine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 4117–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Moldéus, P.; Cotgreave, I.A.; Berggren, M. Lung Protection by a Thiol-Containing Antioxidant: N-Acetylcysteine. Respiration 1986, 50, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Q.; Lu, P.; Martinez, L.; Yang, H.; Lu, W.; Ding, X.; Zhu, L. Factors Affecting Time to Sputum Culture Conversion and Treatment Outcome of Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Tekalegn, Y.; Woldeyohannes, D.; Assefa, T.; Aman, R.; Sahiledengle, B. Predictors of Time to Sputum Culture Conversion among Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in Oromia Region Hospitals, Ethiopia. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 2547–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Salindri, A.D.; Kipiani, M.; Kempker, R.R.; Gandhi, N.R.; Darchia, L.; Tukvadze, N.; Blumberg, H.M.; Magee, M.J. Diabetes Reduces the Rate of Sputum Culture Conversion in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2016, 3, 2009–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yihunie Akalu, T.; Fentahun Muchie, K.; Alemu Gelaye, K. Time to Sputum Culture Conversion and Its Determinants among Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Patients at Public Hospitals of the Amhara Regional State: A Multicenter Retrospective Follow up Study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Reliene, R.; Schiestl, R.H. Glutathione Depletion by Buthionine Sulfoximine Induces DNA Deletions in Mice. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Griffith, O.W.; Meister, A. Potent and specific inhibition of glutathione synthesis by buthionine sulfoximine (S-n-butyl homocysteine sulfoximine). J. Biol. Chem. 1979, 254, 7558–7560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 11 02298 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart of study selection process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart of study selection process.
Antioxidants 11 02298 g001
Table
Table 1. In vitro studies.
Table 1. In vitro studies.
Author and Time of PublicationIn Vitro ExperimentObjectivesIntervention (Methods Overview)Results/OutcomeReference
Lin (2020)Cell culture experiment, derived from Experimental animal modelRAW264.7 macrophages were used to explore the immunological response and cell damage of host cells after incubation with Mycolic Acid.NAC conc. of 600 mg/mL for 2 h was used to treat incubated cells.NAC inhibited the expression of the TNF-α and caspase-9 genes and reduced the translation of apoptotic proteins.[21]
Amaral (2016)70 (32)
Plasma from 30 TB, subjects 20 LTBI, and 20 Healthy control		NAC directly impairs the growth of several species of M.tb in vitro independent of its inhibitory effects on the host NADPH oxidase
System.		10 mM NAC was used to treat M.tb infected Macrophages from 70 subjects.NAC significantly decreased ROS accumulation, lipid peroxidation, and DNA oxidation, while restoring cell viability.[20]
Coleman (2004)Monocyte cells derived from blood collected from 24 Healthy volunteers (21–24)Use of GSH, NAC, Lipoic acid (LA), dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA; to modulate the toxicity of (N1-4-N,N-dimethylamino-1-naphthylidene) pyridine-2-carboxamidrazone (Compound 1), and Isoniazid (INH), which has demonstrated both Mononuclear leukocyte toxicity and anti-mycobacterial action.Isoniazid (INH) and Compound 1-treated cells were incubated with either NAC, GSH, DHLA, or LA in 1 mM; final concentration.GSH and NAC showed abolition of Isoniazid (INH) toxicity to the mononuclear leukocyte cells[22]
Venketaraman (2006)20 Healthy and TB subjectsStudy examined the role of GSH in immunity against TB infection in samples derived from healthy and HIV-human subjects.10 mM NAC conc. was used in cell culture experiment to find the relationship between GSH levels and the ability to kill intracellular M. tb.NAC resulted in more efficient control of intracellular M. tb infection in blood cultures derived from healthy subjects compared to TB Patients;
NAC treatment caused down-regulation of the synthesis of IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α.		[23]
Venketaraman (2008)12 Healthy and TB subjectsTo determine the extent to which GSH levels are decreased in patients with active TB and examine the relationship between GSH and the ability to kill intracellular M.tb and other host immune functions, such as cytokine production.The effect of 10 mM NAC/BSO in altering the intracellular survival of H37Rv M.tb strain.NAC decreased the levels of IL-10, IL-6, TNF-a, and IL-1 in blood cultures derived from TB patients and also showed efficient control of intracellular M. tb infection in blood cultures derived from healthy subjects compared to TB patients[24]
Teskey (2018)13 subjects (20–65)Examined the effect of NAC on M. tb infection.NAC 10 mM + antibiotic in altering the survival of M. tb, Elevated GSH levels.NAC results in significant reduction of M. tb burden in both healthy and diabetic individuals.[25]
Khameneh (2016)NAInvestigation of the antibacterial activity of vitamin C and NAC individually and in combination with RIF and INH against different strains of S. aureus and M.tb.MIC on cell cultures NAC (final conc. 40.0 mg/L) or vitamin C (final conc. 40.0 mg/L).Combination of vitamin C and NAC was able to reduce the hepatotoxicity of the anti-tb drugs and enhanced antimicrobial activity.[26]
Guerra (2012)23 subjectsThe study demonstrated the treatment of NK cells with IL-2 + IL-12 + NAC resulted in inhibition in the growth of H37Rv M.tb strain.20 mM NAC was used in treatment with IL-2 + IL-12.Results unveil an important pathway by which cytokines in conjunction with GSH, enhanced the functions of NK cells to control M. tb infection.[27]
Table
Table 2. Studies on experimental animal Models.
Table 2. Studies on experimental animal Models.
Author And Publication TimeAnimal SpeciesStudy DesignObjectivesNAC DoseResults/OutcomeReference
Amaral (2016)C57BL/6
Micen = 20		NAC directly impairs the growth of several species of mycobacteria in vitro independent of its inhibitory effects on the host NADPH oxidase system. This anti-mycobacterial effect was also observed in an experimental model in vivo.NAC exerts anti mycobacterial activity in vivo.400 mg/Kg daily for 6 days.Lung burden of M. tb-infected mice decreased by 0.5 log10 at day 7 compared to untreated mice.[20]
Palanisamy (2011)Guinea pigs were used To establish the presence of oxidative stress conditions during experimental TB in guinea pigs and to determine whether antioxidant therapy could reverse the adverse effects of progressive inflammation, including lessening the bacterial burden and disease severity.Guinea pigs of 9 Month of age were aerosolized using the Madison infection chamber with H37Rv M.tb with a conc. Of 106 CFU/mL, followed vaccination with or without BCG treated with or without NAC 400 mg/kg.NAC conc. Of 400 mg/kg was used to treat infected mice.Daily administration of NAC resulted in nearly one log reduction in the number of bacilli in the spleen on day 30. No significant differences in the numbers of bacilli were observed between control and NAC-treated groups on days 30 and 60 in lungs and peribronchial lymph node.
An increase in whole blood GSH was seen in NAC-treated animals compared to the mock-treated control group on day 60 of infection.		[28]
Lin (2020)Cell culture and Experimental animal model
(ICR mice)		Animal experiments were performed to investigate the role of NAC in antagonizing the effects of Mycolic Acid in the induction of apoptosis and autophagy.NAC on Mycolic Acid; ICR mice were used to evaluate the lung injury.The intranasal NAC dose used in the studies is not mentioned in the study. NAC inhibited the expression of the TNF-α and caspase-9 genes and reduced the translation of apoptotic proteins.
NAC reduced the secretion of IL-6 significantly; also, NAC attenuated apoptosis and autophagy in response to incubation with Mycolic acid.		[21]
Vilchèze (2021)Cell culture and experimental animal model
(CBA/J mice)		Assessing the function of NAC in vitro, in boosting activity with various combinations of first- and second-line TB drugs against drug-susceptible and multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains.Adjunctive activity of NAC combined with first- or second-line TB drugs in cultures of M. tb, in M. tb-infected macrophage and in M. tb-infected mice.NAC, 0.5 or 1 g/kg; was used orally to treat infected CBA/J mice.NAC enhanced the killing of M. tb by first- and second-line TB drugs in vitro.[18]
Table
Table 3. Clinical trials.
Table 3. Clinical trials.
Author and Publication TimeCountryNo. of Subjects (Mean, Age)Clinical Criteria
(Aim of the Study)		Length of Research (Months)Intervention (Methods Overview)Results/OutcomeReference
Baniasadi (2010)IRAN60 (60)Protective effect of NAC against anti-TB drug-induced hepatotoxicity.Over 2 weeksNAC (600 mg, orally, BIDNAC protects against anti-TB drug-induced hepatotoxicity.[29]
Moosa (2021)SOUTH
AFRICA		102 (38)Assessing whether i.v NAC hastens liver recovery in hospitalized adult patients with anti-tuberculosis drug induced liver injury (AT-DILI).Not reportedNAC dosage was as per Acetaminophen toxicity dosage 150 mg/kg over 1 h, 50 mg/kg over 4 h, and 100 mg/kg over 16 hNAC did not shorten time to ALT < 100 U/L in subjects with AT-DILI, but significantly reduced length of hospital stay. [nausea and vomiting, anaphylaxis, pain at drip site.][30]
Safe (2020)BRAZIL39 (≥18)Impact of adjunctive NAC treatment on host immune response and redox homeostasis in population of hospitalized patients with HIV-associated TB.16 monthsNAC 600 mg BID for 8 weeksRIPENAC group had elevated plasma levels of GSH compared to RIPE group at the same time-point.[31]
Safe (2020)BRAZIL39 (≥18)Testing the hypothesis that NAC is safe, well tolerated and secondarily efficacious as adjunctive anti-TB therapy in hospitalized individuals with HIV-TB.16 monthsNAC 600 mg bid for 8 weeksThe use of NAC in the HIV/TB population seems promising in terms of safety, and mycobacterial clearance results indicate that RIPE plus NAC regimen is suitable for a larger phase III trial.[19]
Mahakalkar (2017)INDIA
67(18–60)		Effect of NAC (add-on to DOTS Category I regimen) on sputum conversion, radiological improvement, and GSH peroxidase; weight and immunological response compared to placebo.18 MonthsStandard anti-TB treatment with or without NAC600 mg dailyAdjunctive NAC increased GSH peroxidase levels in TB patients. GSH increase might reduce ROS, TNF-α production. The combination of NAC effects on both the pathogen and the host might be required to observe
Early sputum negativity also Radiological improvement (87.5% was achieved by NAC group compared to 33.33% in placebo).		[17]
Fox (2020)USA1 (30)Reversal of ALF due to DILI in a patient receiving anti-tubercular agents for active TB.
NAC be considered for patients with anti-TB-associated DILI.		Not reportedI.V. NAC dosage for acute acetaminophen was followed by infusions of 50 mg/kg over 4 h and 100 mg/kg over 16 h, as well as 100 mg/kg as a continuous for a period of 48 h until 2 additional bags had been infused.Oral NAC reported with nausea and vomiting
NAC use can be considered for patients with anti-TB therapy-associated DILI.		[32]
Table
Table 4. Literature reviews.
Table 4. Literature reviews.
Author and Publication TimeObjectivesNAC DoseResults/OutcomeReference
Atkuri (2007)Summarizes the biochemical and pharmacological aspects of NAC that make it a “wise choice” to treat cysteine/GSH deficiencies.NAC ≥ 600 mg/dayCompared to the placebo group, a small fraction of individuals to whom oral NAC was administered experienced nausea, vomiting, and heartburn.[33]
Kranzer (2015)Provision of evidence for the safety and oto- protective effect of NAC when co-administered with aminoglycoside in MDR-TB.NAC (600 mg, orally, twice daily Co-administered with aminoglycosideNAC reduced ototoxicity in 146 patients with end-stage renal failure receiving aminoglycosides, while 83 studies reported with an increased mild adverse events.[34]
Mokhtari (2017)The paper presents a review on various applications of NAC in treatment of several diseases.Use of NAC in the treatment of several diseasesNAC is a safe and well-tolerated supplementary drug without any considerable side effects.[35]
Dawit (2020)NAC-attenuate hearing loss in MDR-TBNAC (600 mg, orally, twice dailyNAC appears to have various beneficial effects on TB treatment.[36]
Young (2020)The review discusses promising pre-clinical candidates and forerunning compounds at advanced stages of clinical investigation in TB host-directed therapeutic (HDT) efficacy trials.TB preventative therapy. HDTs could enhance anti-mycobacterial properties of lung phagocytes, which would prevent infection. For TB contacts and LTBI, we host strengthening preventative strategies, including vitamin supplementation, NAC, and BCG re-vaccination.Applicability of HDTs to MDR-TB, TB treatment shortening, TB/HIV, and TB-derived lung diseases, although highlighted in some studies, have not been considered for all HDTs.[37]
Schwalfenberg. (2021)Review the clinical usefulness of NAC as treatment or adjunctive therapy in a number of medical conditions.NAC 1200 mg/dayNAC appears to be well tolerated with minimal side effects when used as a supplement or in treatment of various disorders.[38]
Tenório (2021)Overview of the medicinal effects and applications of NAC to human health based on current therapeutic evidence.NAC 1200 mg/dayThere is a need to clarifying adequate dosages and treatment protocols.[39]
Table
Table 5. Forest plot on sputum culture conversion.
Table 5. Forest plot on sputum culture conversion.
Risk RatioRisk Ratio
Study or
Subgroup		Log [Risk Ratio]SEWeightIV, Random, 95% CIIV, Random, 95% CI
Mhakalkar (2017) [17]0.0860.0697.3%1.09 [0.97, 1.23]Antioxidants 11 02298 i001
Safe (2020) [19]0.30.362.7%1.35 [0.67, 2.73]
Total (95%CI) 100.0%1.10 [0.98, 1.23]
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.00; Chi2 = 0.34, df = 1 (p < 0.56); I2 = 0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.55 (p = 0.12)Favors [Experimental] Favors [Control]
Table
Table 6. Forest plot on adverse events.
Table 6. Forest plot on adverse events.
Risk DifferenceRisk Difference
Study or SubgroupRisk DifferenceSEWeightIV, Random, 95% CIIV, Random, 95% CI
Baniasadi (2010) [29]−0.380.0834.8%−0.38 [−0.54–0.22]Antioxidants 11 02298 i002
Moosa (2020) [30]0.140.0934.2%0.14 [−0.04, 0.32]
Safe (2020) [31]0.160.1431.0%0.16 [−0.11, 0.43]
Total (95% CI) 100.0%−0.03 [−0.42, 0.35]
Heterogeneity: Tau 2 = 0.10; Chi2 = 22.81, df = 2 (p < 0.0001); I2 = 91%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mapamba, D.A.; Sauli, E.; Mrema, L.; Lalashowi, J.; Magombola, D.; Buza, J.; Olomi, W.; Wallis, R.S.; Ntinginya, N.E. Impact of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) on Tuberculosis (TB) Patients—A Systematic Review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112298

AMA Style

Mapamba DA, Sauli E, Mrema L, Lalashowi J, Magombola D, Buza J, Olomi W, Wallis RS, Ntinginya NE. Impact of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) on Tuberculosis (TB) Patients—A Systematic Review. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(11):2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mapamba, Daniel Adon, Elingarami Sauli, Lucy Mrema, Julieth Lalashowi, David Magombola, Joram Buza, Willyhelmina Olomi, Robert S. Wallis, and Nyanda Elias Ntinginya. 2022. "Impact of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) on Tuberculosis (TB) Patients—A Systematic Review" Antioxidants 11, no. 11: 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112298

APA Style

Mapamba, D. A., Sauli, E., Mrema, L., Lalashowi, J., Magombola, D., Buza, J., Olomi, W., Wallis, R. S., & Ntinginya, N. E. (2022). Impact of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) on Tuberculosis (TB) Patients—A Systematic Review. Antioxidants, 11(11), 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112298

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop