Next Article in Journal
Neuromodulation for Pelvic and Urogenital Pain
Next Article in Special Issue
Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps Brachii is Not Different When Arm Cycling at a Self-Selected or Fixed Cadence
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Degenerative Brain Diseases, an Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chiropractic Manipulation Increases Maximal Bite Force in Healthy Individuals
Open AccessArticle

Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?

University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Ontario, ON L1G 0C5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2018, 8(10), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8100179
Received: 24 July 2018 / Revised: 29 August 2018 / Accepted: 21 September 2018 / Published: 24 September 2018
Recent work found that experimental pain appeared to negate alterations in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) that occurred in response to motor learning acquisition of a novel tracing task. The goal of this experiment was to further investigate the interactive effects of pain stimulus location on motor learning acquisition, retention, and sensorimotor processing. Three groups of twelve participants (n = 36) were randomly assigned to either a local capsaicin group, remote capsaicin group or contralateral capsaicin group. SEPs were collected at baseline, post-application of capsaicin cream, and following a motor learning task. Participants performed a motor tracing acquisition task followed by a pain-free retention task 24–48 h later while accuracy data was recorded. The P25 (p < 0.001) SEP peak significantly decreased following capsaicin application for all groups. Following motor learning acquisition, the N18 SEP peak decreased for the remote capsaicin group (p = 0.02) while the N30 (p = 0.002) SEP peaks increased significantly following motor learning acquisition for all groups. The local, remote and contralateral capsaicin groups improved in accuracy following motor learning (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between the groups. Early SEP alterations are markers of the neuroplasticity that accompanies acute pain and motor learning acquisition. Improved motor learning while in acute pain may be due to an increase in arousal, as opposed to increased attention to the limb performing the task. View Full-Text
Keywords: somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs); motor learning; remote pain; local pain somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs); motor learning; remote pain; local pain
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Dancey, E.; Yielder, P.; Murphy, B. Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration? Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 179.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop