Next Article in Journal
Behavior of Rats in a Self-Paced Risky Decision-Making Task Based on Definite Probability
Previous Article in Journal
Binge-like Prenatal Ethanol Exposure Causes Impaired Cellular Differentiation in the Embryonic Forebrain and Synaptic and Behavioral Defects in Adult Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Single Session of SMR-Neurofeedback Training Improves Selective Attention Emerging from a Dynamic Structuring of Brain–Heart Interplay

1
Laboratoire IMS, CNRS, UMR 5218, Université de Bordeaux, 33400 Talence, France
2
URGOTECH, 15 Avenue d’Iéna, 75116 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(6), 794; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060794
Submission received: 13 May 2022 / Revised: 13 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 June 2022 / Published: 17 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Behavioral Neuroscience)

Abstract

Research on sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) based on neurofeedback (NFb) emphasizes improvements in selective attention associated with SMR amplification. However, the long-term training proposed in most studies posed the question of acceptability, which led to the evaluation of the potential of a single NFb session. Based on cognitive and autonomic controls interfering with attention processes, we hypothesized changes in selective attention after a single SMR-NFb session, along with changes in brain–heart interplay, which are reflected in the multifractality of heartbeat dynamics. Here, young healthy participants (n = 35, 20 females, 21 ± 3 years) were randomly assigned either to a control group (Ctrl) watching a movie or to a neurofeedback (NFb) group performing a single session of SMR-NFb. A headset with EEG electrodes (positioned on C3 and C4) connected to a smartphone app served to guide and to evaluate NFb training efficacy. A Stroop task was performed for 8 min by each group before and after the intervention (movie vs. SMR-NFb) while collecting heart rate variability and C4-EEG for 20 min. When compared to Ctrl, the NFb group exhibited better Stroop performance, especially when facing incongruent trials. The multifractality and NFb training efficacy were identified as strong predictors of the gain in global Stroop performance, while multifractality was the only predictor regarding incongruent trials. We conclude that a single session of SMR-NFb improves selective attention in healthy individuals through the specific reorganization of brain–heart interplay, which is reflected in multifractal heartbeat dynamics.
Keywords: brain waves; complexity; entropy; HRV; multifractality; selective attention; SMR neurofeedback brain waves; complexity; entropy; HRV; multifractality; selective attention; SMR neurofeedback

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouny, P.; Arsac, L.M.; Pratviel, Y.; Boffet, A.; Touré Cuq, E.; Deschodt-Arsac, V. A Single Session of SMR-Neurofeedback Training Improves Selective Attention Emerging from a Dynamic Structuring of Brain–Heart Interplay. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060794

AMA Style

Bouny P, Arsac LM, Pratviel Y, Boffet A, Touré Cuq E, Deschodt-Arsac V. A Single Session of SMR-Neurofeedback Training Improves Selective Attention Emerging from a Dynamic Structuring of Brain–Heart Interplay. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12(6):794. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060794

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouny, Pierre, Laurent M. Arsac, Yvan Pratviel, Alexis Boffet, Emma Touré Cuq, and Veronique Deschodt-Arsac. 2022. "A Single Session of SMR-Neurofeedback Training Improves Selective Attention Emerging from a Dynamic Structuring of Brain–Heart Interplay" Brain Sciences 12, no. 6: 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060794

APA Style

Bouny, P., Arsac, L. M., Pratviel, Y., Boffet, A., Touré Cuq, E., & Deschodt-Arsac, V. (2022). A Single Session of SMR-Neurofeedback Training Improves Selective Attention Emerging from a Dynamic Structuring of Brain–Heart Interplay. Brain Sciences, 12(6), 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060794

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop