Next Article in Journal
RETRACTED: The Impact of COVID-19 on Cognitive Development and Executive Functioning in Adolescents: A First Exploratory Investigation
Previous Article in Journal
Impulsive and Omission Errors: Potential Temporal Processing Endophenotypes in ADHD
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation

1
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604 Bielefeld, Germany
2
Department of Radiology, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, 33604 Bielefeld, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(9), 1221; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091221
Submission received: 14 August 2021 / Revised: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 12 September 2021 / Published: 16 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Sensory and Motor Neuroscience)

Abstract

Background: The combination of intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS) removal and cochlear implantation is the standard of care after surgical resection for audiological rehabilitation. Intracochlear ILS is not only the most frequent tumor in this group of schwannomas, but it is also, to some degree, surgically the most challenging because of its position behind the modiolus. Recent developments in the knowledge of implant position, implant magnet choice, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences make an MRI follow-up after surgical removal possible. Thus far, no results are known about the surgical success and residual rate of these kind of tumors. The aim of the present study was to perform an early MRI follow-up for the evaluation of residual or recurrent intracochlear ILS after surgical removal and cochlear implantation. Methods: In a retrospective study, we evaluated seven patients after an intracochlear ILS removal and single-stage cochlear implantation with a mean period of 13.4 months post surgery with a 3T T1 GAD 2 mm sequence for a residual ILS. Patients were operated on using an individualized technique concept. Results: In six out of seven cases, 3 T T1 GAD 2 mm MRI follow-up showed no residual or recurrent tumor. In one case, a T1 signal indicated a tumor of the upper inner auditory canal (IAC) at the MRI follow up. Conclusion: MRI follow-up as a quality control tool after ILS removal and cochlear implantation is highly important to exclude residual tumors. Long-term MRI evaluation results are needed and can be obtained under consideration of implant position, implant magnet, and MRI sequence choice. A preoperative MRI slice thickness less than 2 mm can be recommended to visualize possible modiolar and IAC expansion.
Keywords: MRI; cochlear implant; intracochlear intralabyrinthine schwannoma MRI; cochlear implant; intracochlear intralabyrinthine schwannoma

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sudhoff, H.; Scholtz, L.U.; Gehl, H.B.; Todt, I. Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091221

AMA Style

Sudhoff H, Scholtz LU, Gehl HB, Todt I. Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation. Brain Sciences. 2021; 11(9):1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sudhoff, Holger, Lars Uwe Scholtz, Hans Björn Gehl, and Ingo Todt. 2021. "Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation" Brain Sciences 11, no. 9: 1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091221

APA Style

Sudhoff, H., Scholtz, L. U., Gehl, H. B., & Todt, I. (2021). Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation. Brain Sciences, 11(9), 1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop