Next Article in Journal
The Tolerability and Efficacy of 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Leg Muscle Fatigability
Previous Article in Journal
Fatigue and Affective Manifestations in Multiple Sclerosis—A Cluster Approach
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Cerebellar Disorders

Brain Sci. 2020, 10(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010011
by Hiroshi Mitoma 1,*, Mario Manto 2,3 and Jordi Gandini 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010011
Submission received: 25 November 2019 / Revised: 13 December 2019 / Accepted: 20 December 2019 / Published: 23 December 2019

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript by Mitoma et al. reviews current treatments used for a wide range of cerebellar disorders.

The review is both informative and very well written. A plethora of cerebellar disorders and current/experimental treatments are covered within the manuscript.

Upon reflection, my single suggestion is that it would be helpful to add a section on the causes and potential treatments of the Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) – particularly as several SCAs are defined as ‘pure’ cerebellar ataxias. 

Author Response

We are grateful to the reviewer 1 for the evaluation of the manuscript.

We agree with the comment. We added a new Table sumamrizing SCD therapies  available or developement (Table 5). Accordingly, we added new references and made some modifications in Text (highlighted by yellow marker).

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have submitted an interesting review regarding most of the available and potential treatments for different types of cerebellar disorders.

The authors have submitted an interesting review regarding most of the available and potential treatments for different types of cerebellar disorders.

The manuscript is well written, clearly organized, and the bibliography is quite actual end extensive. There is not any suggestion to improve the quality of this manuscript

Author Response

We are grateful to the reveiwer 2 for the evaluation of the manuscript.

Back to TopTop