Next Article in Journal
Prediction of Air Pollution Concentration Based on mRMR and Echo State Network
Next Article in Special Issue
Conversion of Stearic Acid into Bio-Gasoline over Pd/ZSM-5 Catalysts with Enhanced Accessibility
Previous Article in Journal
Limestone and Calcined Clay-Based Sustainable Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing: A Fundamental Study of Extrudability and Early-Age Strength Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
NO-CH4-SCR Over Core-Shell MnH-Zeolite Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/app9091810
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Separation of N–C5H12–C9H20 Paraffins Using Boehmite by Inverse Gas Chromatography

Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(9), 1810; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091810
by José L. Contreras-Larios 1, Antonia Infantes-Molina 2, Luís A. Negrete-Melo 1, Juan M. Labadie-Suárez 3, Hernani T. Yee-Madeira 4, Miguel A. Autie-Pérez 3,* and Enrique Rodríguez-Castellón 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(9), 1810; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091810
Submission received: 28 March 2019 / Revised: 8 April 2019 / Accepted: 17 April 2019 / Published: 30 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Sieves: Synthesis, Characterization and Application (Concerning to the 6th Cycle of Lectures on Molecular Sieves))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper essentially describes the characterization of a particular form of alumina. The methods appear to be sound and the conclusions valid. There are a number of minor grammatical errors that will be fixed in proofing I think, for example:

Line 55: should read "studied" not "study".

Line 56: Should read "used in"

Line 81: should read "sensitivity" not "sensibility"

Line 112: should read "two-term" not "two terms"

114: should read "two pore" not "two pores"

Line 154: "the expected" should read "as expected".

Line 169: subscripting on numbers needed.


The Term "ATD" only appears in the figure 2 cation, needs to be defined somewhere.

Author Response

Thank you for your comments and suggestions 

Line 55: should read "studied" not "study".

Done

Line 56: Should read "used in"

Done

Line 81: should read "sensitivity" not "sensibility"

Done

Line 112: should read "two-term" not "two terms"

Done

Line 114: should read "two pore" not "two pores"

Done

Line 154: "the expected" should read "as expected".

Done

Line 169: subscripting on numbers needed.

Done

The Term "ATD" only appears in the figure 2 cation, needs to be defined somewhere.

Thank you for this comment. The term "ATD" is wrong. The right is DTG. 


Other grammar and misspelling mistakes were mended and indicated in the revised version.


Reviewer 2 Report

 

The paper entitled “Separation of n-C5H12-C9H20 Paraffins using Boehmite by Inverse Gas Chromatography”  by  José L. Contreras-Larios, Antonia Infantes-Molina, Luís A. Negrete-Melo, Juan M. Labadie-Suárez, Hernani T. Yee-Madeira, Miguel A. Autie-Pérez, Enrique Rodríguez-Castellón is trial to use chromatography to achieve an application of separation.

The format and English style is OK, except for the references where include several mistakes: Catal. Letters instead of Catal. Lett.

The paper deserves publication even though the insight is not that meaningful, or this could be solved, because as it is, the application seems poor.


Author Response

Thank for your comments and sugegstions.


We have corrected the mistakes indicated and the English has been adited again.



Back to TopTop