Next Article in Journal
Examination of Multi-Pulse Rectifiers of PES Systems Used on Airplanes Compliant with the Concept of Electrified Aircraft
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Removal of Cr(VI) by Lime Peel and Pineapple Core Wastes
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Salix Carbonation Solid Acid Catalysts for One-Step Synthesis by Response Surface Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electroadsorptive Removal of Gaseous Pollutants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydrothermal Conversion of Red Mud into Magnetic Adsorbent for Effective Adsorption of Zn(II) in Water

1
Science and Technology Innovation Center for Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Water Quality Protection, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130017, China
2
Guangdong Shouhui Lantian Engineering and Technology Corporation, Guangzhou 510075, China
3
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Municipal Wastewater Treatment, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130021, China
4
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(8), 1519; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081519
Submission received: 22 February 2019 / Revised: 2 April 2019 / Accepted: 9 April 2019 / Published: 12 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced or Conventional Materials as Sorbent)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

This approach focused on the direct conversion of andradite-rich red mud to magnetite-containing magnetic adsorbent, which had great potential for recycling Fe-rich solid waste. The produced low-cost magnetic adsorbent demonstrated superior Zn(II) adsorption in smelting wastewater treatment and could also be used as the low-cost core for coating functional groups in the synthesis of functional magnetic materials.

Abstract

Red mud, a Fe-rich waste generated from the aluminum industry, was recovered as an adsorbent for wastewater treatment. The separation process of red mud from water after adsorption, including centrifugation and filtration, was complicated. This study demonstrated an alternative option to recycle red mud for preparing magnetic adsorbent via a facile hydrothermal route using ascorbic acid as reductant. Red mud is weakly magnetized and consists of andradite, muscovite, hematite, and cancrinite. After hydrothermal treatment, andradite in red mud was reductively dissolved by ascorbic acid, and transformed into magnetite and morimotoite. With increasing hydrothermal temperature, the dissolution of andradite accelerated, and the crystallite size of magnetite increased. When the hydrothermal temperature reached 200 °C, the prepared adsorbent P-200 showed a desirable saturation magnetization of 4.1 Am2/kg, and could be easily magnetically separated from water after adsorption. The maximum adsorption capacity of P-200 for Zn2+ was 89.6 mg/g, which is eight-fold higher than that of the raw red mud. The adsorption of Zn2+ by P-200 fitted the Langmuir model, where cation exchange was the main adsorption mechanism. The average distribution coefficient of Zn2+ at low ppm level was 16.81 L/g for P-200, higher than those of the red mud (0.3 L/g) and the prepared P-120 (1.48 L/g) and P-270 (5.48 L/g), demonstrating that P-200 had the best adsorption capacity for Zn2+ and can be served as a practical adsorbent for real-world applications. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the conversion of red mud into a magnetic adsorbent under mild conditions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Red mud is a solid waste and abundantly produced from the treatment of bauxite with sodium hydroxide during Al extraction. For 1 ton of alumina extracted, approximately 1 to 2 tons of red mud residual is produced [1]. Due to its high calcium and sodium hydroxide contents, red mud is relatively toxic and causes severe environmental pollution and ecological damage [2]. Thus, safe disposal methods have been developed for red mud (including dewatering, drying, and landfilling [3]), which cause additional cost and require regular management.
The resource utilization of red mud could solve its disposal problems [4,5,6,7,8]. Recently, research has focused on utilizing red mud for the removal of toxic heavy metals [9], phosphate [10], and harmful organics [11]. Sahu et al. [9] investigated the pretreatment of red mud by a combined method of CO2 neutralization and calcining at 500 °C, and found that the pretreated red mud showed high adsorption capacity of Zn2+ (14.9 mg/g). Wang et al. [10] reported that after hydrochloric acid neutralization, the neutralized red mud exhibited higher adsorption capacity for phosphate (108.6 mg/g) than untreated red mud. However, the separation process of red mud from water after adsorption, including high-speed centrifugation, precipitation, coagulation and/or filtration [5,9,10], was tedious, which limited its application for wastewater treatment. An optimal method to rapidly separate red mud from water was to convert weakly magnetized red mud into magnetically separated adsorbent.
The Fe oxides in red mud can be converted into magnetic magnetite after roasting under addition of pyrite [12], coal [13], or by injecting H2 [14] and methane [15]. Liu et al. [12] reported that part of the Fe oxides in red mud was converted into magnetite with pyrite as exogenous ferrous and reducing regent after calcination at 600 °C. Samouhos et al. [14] reported that 87% of the hematite (Fe2O3) in red mud was transformed into magnetite after roasting at 480 °C using H2 as reductant. However, high temperatures were applied in these methods to promote the breakdown of the Fe-O-Si or Fe-O-Al bonds into the form of Fe-O-Fe linkage [16]. The breakdown of Fe-O-Si or Fe-O-Al bonds can be achieved at low temperature [17]. For instance, by adding iron powder, red mud could be converted to magnetite-containing materials after hydrothermal treatment at 260 °C [18]. However, the obtained magnetite was probably generated from the oxidation of iron powder. Iron-bearing minerals, such as andradite and hematite [6], were abundant in red mud, and can be converted into magnetic minerals by adding reductants under mild condition. However, the phase transformation of Fe-bearing minerals in red mud has not yet been studied.
In this study, red mud was converted into magnetic adsorbent via a facile hydrothermal route using ascorbic acid as reductant. To demonstrate the potential applications of red mud, the ability of the synthesized magnetic adsorbent to remove Zn2+ from water was investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Red Mud

Red mud was acquired from Sanhe Aluminum Co., Ltd. (Yichang, Hubei, China) and vacuum-dried at 55 °C overnight before use. The main components of red mud as detected by X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF, S4-Explorer, Bruker, Germany) were CaO (19.9%), Al2O3 (19.9%), SiO2 (17.5%), Fe2O3 (16.6%), TiO2 (6.2%), and Na2O (3.8%). After red mud was dispersed into water overnight, the pH of the liquid fraction reached approximately 11.5, indicating that red mud was alkaline and required stabilization.

2.2. Synthesis of Magnetic Adsorbent

Approximately 1 g of dry red mud was dispersed in 30 mL 4 mol/L NaOH to form a brownish suspension. Ascorbic acid was then dumped into the suspension at a molar ratio of ascorbic acid to iron of 2in the red mud. The suspension was magnetically stirred for 10 min, and then transferred to a Teflon kettle to heat at 120 °C for 10 h. After cooling down to room temperature, the precipitate was collected and then washed five times with deionized water, followed by vacuum-drying at 50 °C for 24 h. The obtained sample was named P-120. The controls were conducted according to the procedures as described above. In the controls, the hydrothermal temperature was changed from 120 °C to 200 °C and 270 °C, and the obtained adsorbents were denoted P-200 and P-270, respectively.

2.3. Adsorption Experiment

The adsorption performances of red mud and the prepared adsorbents were investigated using Zn2+ as target. Stock solutions with Zn2+ concentrations in the range of 0-120 mg/L were prepared, and adjusted to pH 4 by adding 5% NaOH and 5% HCl. 20 mL stock solution was mixed with 0.01 g adsorbent in a series of triangular flasks. The flasks were placed in an incubator (THZ-98C, Shanghai Yiheng) and then shaken at shaken at 150 rpm for 12 h. After adsorption, the obtained magnetic adsorbents P-200 and P-270, respectively, were magnetically separated, while red mud and P-120 were centrifuged at 5500 rpm for 5 min. The concentration of Zn2+ in the supernatant was measured by an inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, Avio 200, PerkinElmer, USA).
The adsorbed amount (qe1, mg/g) of Zn2+ was calculated via Equation (1):
q e 1 = ( C 1 C e 1 ) × V m 1
where C1 and Ce1 represent the initial Zn2+ concentration and the equilibrium concentration (mg/L) after adsorption, V represents the solution volume (L), and m1 represents the adsorbent weight (g).
The Na+ concentration in the supernatant was measured using an ion chromatograph (883 Basic, Metrohm, Switzerland) coupled with a C4 cation column (Metrohm, Switzerland). The released amount (qe2, mg/g) of Na+ was calculated via Equation (2):
q e 2 = ( C e 2 C 2 ) × V m 1
where C2 and Ce2 represent the initial concentration of Na+ in the solution and the equilibrium concentration after adsorption (mg/L).

2.4. Surface Site Concentration

The adsorption of Zn2+ on red mud and P-120, P-200, and P-270 was related to the concentration of surface coordination sites of these adsorbents. The surface site concentrations (Hs) were measured by a potentiometric titrator (ZDJ-4A, Leici, China). In the titration experiments, 0.1 g of the adsorbents was mixed with 50 mL of 0.01 mol/L NaNO3 in a conical flask, followed by bubbling with pure N2. After that, the pH value of the solution was adjusted to 4 with 0.6 mol/L nitric acid, and then back-titrated to approximately 10 with 0.3 mol/L NaOH.
When nitric acid was added to the solution, a cationic exchange reaction between the H+ in the solution and the coordinated cations (denoted as Me, e.g., Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) on the surface coordination sites ≡SO (S represents Fe, Si, or Al) of the adsorbents occurred as shown in Equation (3). Thus, part of the free H+ was associated with the coordination sites of the adsorbent. By adding NaOH, the free H+ in the liquid fraction was first neutralized with OH, and then, the coordinated H+ on the surface sites ≡SO of the adsorbents was replaced by cationic Na+ via cationic exchange (Equation (4)). Finally, the pH of the solution increased due to the addition of overdosed NaOH:
S O M e n + + H + S O H + + M e n + ,
S O H + + NaOH S O N a + + H 2 O ,
The Gran function value (denoted as G) was calculated via Equations (5) and (6):
Under   acidic   conditions ,   G = ( V 0 + V 1 + V 2 ) × 10 pH ,
Under   alkaline   conditions ,   G = ( V 0 + V 1 + V 2 ) × 10 ( 13.8 pH ) ,
where V0, V1, and V2 represent the volume (mL) of the initial solution, the titrated HNO3 and NaOH, separately.
The Hs (mmol/g) of the adsorbents was calculated with the following equation:
H s = ( V eb 2 V eb 1 ) adsorbent ( V eb 2 V eb 1 ) blank m 2 × C NaOH
where Veb1 and Veb2 represent the volume of the consumed NaOH for the neutralization of free H+ in the liquid solution, and the total H+ in the liquid solution and the adsorbents surface; CNaOH represents the NaOH concentration (mol/L); m2 represents the adsorbent weight (g).

2.5. Characteristics

The crystal structure of red mud and the adsorbents were determined by an X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, RAPID-S, Rigaku, Japan). The saturation magnetization of red mud and the adsorbents were detected by a superconducting quantum interference devices magnetometer (SQUID-VSM, Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed with a spectrometer (ADES 400, VG-ADES, UK). The composition of red mud and the adsorbents was analyzed by XRF spectroscopy. The morphology of red mud and the adsorbents were recorded by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FE-SEM, FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Conversion of Red Mud into Magnetic Adsorbent

To determine the crystallography of both red mud and the adsorbents, XRD experiments were conducted. The observed peaks in Figure 1 in the red mud indicate the presence of andradite (JCPDS 87-1971), hematite (JCPDS 33-0664), cancrinite (JCPDS 72-2076), clinochlore (79-1270), muscovite (JCPDS 07-0042), and morimotoite (JCPDS 47-1877). After hydrothermal treatment at 120 °C, no apparent change of the XRD pattern of P-120 was observed. When the temperature increased to 200 °C, two typical muscovite peaks at 2θ = 8.8° and 26.8° were not observed and the major peak of andradite at 2θ = 32.3° was significantly reduced in the diffraction pattern of P-200. Instead, the peaks of cancrinite, clinochlore, and morimotoite increased. Notably, new peaks at 2θ = 30.1° and 35.4° appeared, which belonged to an inverse spinel magnetite (JCPDS 19-0629) [19]. Those results indicated that the dissolution of muscovite occurred with the temperature increasing from 120 °C to 200 °C, followed by the reductive dissolution of andradite and hematite with ascorbic acid at a higher temperature.
Ascorbic acid was a typical reductant, and could react with andradite and hematite at room temperature [20,21]; however, the process was inhibited by the Si/Al coating (e.g., amorphous aluminosilicate) [22] on the surface of andradite and hematite. With the temperature increasing form 120 °C to 200 °C, similar to the dissolution of muscovite in red mud, the Si/Al coating on andradite and hematite was also attacked by hydroxyl with generation of SiO32− and Al(OH)4 into the liquid fraction [23,24]. Thus, andradite and hematite were exposed to the liquid fraction, and reduced by ascorbic acid. Without adding ascorbic acid, andradite was stable in alkaline conditions, and generated in the presence of cancrinite and hematite during the hydrothermal treatment of red mud [25].
In the hydrothermal process, Si, Al and Fe from the dissolution of muscovite, andradite, and hematite were involved in the recrystallization of Fe2+-containing minerals, such as morimotoite, clinochlore, and magnetite. With the absence of Fe2+, Si and Al were recrystallized in the form of cancrinite, which was in agreement with the report of Zhang et al. [26]. The cages of cancrinite’s 12-membered ring channels conferred it enough sites for anions coordination [27] and preferentially selected CO32− as structure stabilizer over OH [28] when the former was generated from the oxidation of ascorbic acid and present in solution.
When the temperature was increased to 270 °C, the major peaks of andradite and hematite decreased, while the peaks of morimotoite and magnetite increased. By increasing temperature, the dissolution rates of Al and Si were greatly enhanced [29], which accelerated the dissolution of Si/Al coating on the surface of andradite and hematite. Accordingly, the transformation of andradite and hematite into morimotoite and magnetite was promoted.
The formation of magnetite in P-200 and P-270 was accompanied by considerable changes in magnetic behavior. Red mud was weakly magnetized (Figure 2A) and not magnetically separated (Figure 2B). Similar to red mud, P-120, prepared at a hydrothermal temperature of 120 °C, showed a weak magnetic response due to the lack of magnetic species (e.g., magnetite). When the red mud was treated at 200 °C, the prepared P-200 exhibited magnetization of 4.1 Am2/kg, which had a magnetic response and can be magnetically separated from liquid fraction after use (Figure 2B). As the temperature increased to 270 °C, the saturation magnetization of P-270 further increased to 11.9 Am2/kg. This finding was consistent with the presence of magnetite in P-200 and P-270, as shown in Figure 1.
The dissolution of muscovite and andradite in red mud after hydrothermal treatment indicated the difference in the composition of the prepared adsorbents. As shown in Figure 3A, the Si content was 10.7 wt.% for red mud, which slightly decreased to 9.6 wt.% for P-120. Accordingly, the Si concentration in the supernatant of P-120 was 24.1 mg/L. The loss of Si in P-120 was subjected to the dissolution of Si-containing minerals, such as muscovite and andradite.
When the temperature increased from 120 °C to 200 °C, the Si content remained unchanged, and the contents of both Ca and Fe increased from 16.1 wt.% and 12.7 wt.% for P-120 to 19.3 wt.% and 16.2 wt.% for P-200. In contrast, the Al content dramatically decreased from 12.1 wt.% for P-120 to 7.5 wt.% for P-200. This finding was attributed to the reductive dissolution of muscovite and andradite. When the structural Fe in the muscovite and andradite was reduced to Fe2+ by ascorbic acid, dissolution of muscovite and andradite occurred, followed by a release of Al into the liquid solution. The released Al was rapidly converted into Al(OH)4 under alkaline conditions, and coordinated to the surface sites of residual minerals [16]. However, abundant OH was present in the liquid solution and competed with the coordinated Al(OH)4 via ion exchange reaction, which led to release of Al(OH)4 into the liquid solution. Thus, the high-loss of Al in P-200 was observed. Furthermore, the Al concentration in the supernatant was 281.6 mg/L for P-120, and was considerably higher for P-200 (4466 mg/L), which was consistent with the loss of Al in P-200 in comparison to that of P-120. This finding indicates that the dissolution of muscovite and andradite accelerated when the temperature was above 200 °C. With the temperature increasing from 200 °C to 270 °C, P-270 showed a similar composition to P-200 except that the Fe content was slightly decreased from 16.2 wt.% for P-200 to 15.8 wt.% for P-270. Accordingly, the Fe concentration in the supernatant increased from 33 mg/L for P-200 to 86 mg/L for P-270. Muscovite was completely dissolved with the temperature increasing to 200 °C. Thus, the loss of Fe in P-270 was subjected to the release of Fe2+ via the reduction of structural Fe in andradite.
The major iron-bearing minerals in red mud were andradite and hematite. During the hydrothermal process, muscovite was dissolved under alkaline conditions by increasing the temperature to 200 °C. When ascorbic acid was added, it has the ability to provide electrons to the structural Fe in andradite and hematite with the formation of Fe2+ and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) [21]. This led to the reductive dissolution of andradite and hematite (Equation (8)). During the dissolution of muscovite, andradite, hematite, Ca, Fe, Si, and Al were released into the liquid fraction (Figure 4 (Step 1)). Simultaneously, ascorbic acid also reacted with dissolved oxygen, which accelerated the consumption of ascorbic acid. When ascorbic acid was exhausted, extra dissolved oxygen was left. Under the alkaline conditions, the released Fe2+ was rapidly hydrolyzed to Fe(OH)2 (Equation (9)), which was further reoxidized to Fe3+ by the dissolved oxygen (Equation (10) and Figure 4 (Step 2)), and coprecipitated with adjacent Fe2+ to form Fe3O4 (Equation (11) and Figure 4 (Step 3)) [30,31]:
2 F e 3 + + H A 2 F e 2 + + DHA ,
F e 2 + + 2 O H F e ( O H ) 2 ,
4 F e ( O H ) 2 + O 2 + 2 H 2 O 4 F e ( O H ) 3 ,
F e ( O H ) 2 + 2 F e ( O H ) 3 F e 3 O 4 + 4 H 2 O ,
Moreover, the generated Fe2+ was also involved in the crystallization of morimotoite (Figure 4 (Step 4)). In the absence of Fe, the released Ca, Si, and Al were recrystallized in the formation of cancrinite (Figure 4 (Step 5)) [32].

3.2. Morphology

The morphologies of red mud and the prepared adsorbents were shown in Figure 5. The red mud was an amorphous agglomerate with small particles on the surface (Figure 5A). P-120 showed a similar morphology to the red mud (Figure 5B). When the temperature reached 200 °C, P-200 exhibited fine particles with the size of 0.2–2 μm (Figure 5C), which was related to the dissolution of muscovite and andradite in red mud. Compared to P-200, a new octahedron with the size of 1–4 μm belonged to the inverse spinel Fe3O4 [33], indicating that the high temperature promoted the crystal growth of magnetite.

3.3. Adsorption

Zn2+ is a common heavy metal ion, which is widely distributed in the wastewater from smelting, electroplating, and steel rolling industries. Thus, the adsorption performance of red mud and the prepared adsorbents on Zn2+ were investigated. As shown in Figure 6, the adsorption of Zn2+ was ranked in the following order: red mud < P-120 < P−270 < P-200. The adsorption data was fitted with the non-linear Langmuir and Freundlich models, respectively, and the results showed that the regression coefficient values (R2) of Langmuir model were approximately 0.99 for red mud and the three adsorbents (Table 1), which exceeded those of the Freundlich model. This finding indicated that the red mud and the prepared adsorbents have an energetically homogeneous surface [34] for the adsorption of Zn2+. P-200 showed the desirable adsorption capacity for Zn2+ (89.6 mg/g), higher than that of red mud, P-120, P-270, and other reported magnetic adsorbents, such as graphene oxide (73 mg/g) [35], magnetic nano-silicon materials (51.2 mg/g) [36], and dry algae (60 mg/g) [37]. Therefore, P-200 has great potential for Zn2+ adsorption.
The adsorption capacity of Zn2+ was in agreement with the number of surface coordination sites on red mud and the three adsorbents, which could be determined by Hs with the Gran method. As shown in Figure 7 and Table 1, Hs could be listed in the following order: red mud < P-120 < P-270 < P-200, which was consistent with the adsorption capacities of Zn2+ on these adsorbents. P-200 showed the optimal Hs of 4.35 mmol/g, indicating that it had sufficient surface coordination sites for Zn2+ adsorption.
The distribution coefficient (Kd) was a useful index for comparing the adsorption capacities of red mud and the obtained adsorbents for Zn2+ under the same experimental condition [38,39], and calculated according to the following equation:
K d = q e C e ,
where qe is the amount of Zn2+ adsorbed on red mud or the obtained adsorbents (mg/g), and Ce is the equilibrium concentration of Zn2+ in the solution.
As shown in Figure 8A, Kd decreased with the increase of the initial concentration of Zn2+. Generally, at a high initial concentration of Zn2+, the surface sites of P-200 became saturated with Zn2+ [39,40], which caused large number of unabsorbed Zn2+ remaining in the liquid fraction and apparently exhibited low Kd (Figure 8A and Table 2). However, at a low initial concentration of Zn2+, P-200 showed a high value of Kd in comparison with P-120, P-270 and commercial adsorbents (Table 2), such as graphene oxide [36] and Tunisian smectite [41], demonstrating that P-200 had desirable performance for sorption of Zn2+. Other adsorbents, such as magnetic core-silica shell particles [36], dry algae [37], and magnetic modified chitosan [42], showed very low Kd (Table 2), indicating that they were fairly ineffective for Zn2+ adsorption.
The plots of adsorption capacity versus equilibrium concentration in solution did not yield a straight line (Figure 8A). Thus, an average Kd value (Kd medium) was calculated according to the method of Lu and Xu [43] and used to compare the adsorption performance of red mud and the obtained adsorbents for Zn2+ adsorption. As shown in Figure 8B, Kd medium of Zn2+ on red mud and the obtained adsorbents were in the following order: P-200 > P-270 > P-120 > red mud, which was in agreement with the order of the surface site concentrations and the maximum adsorption capacities of red mud and the obtained adsorbents.
As shown in Table 2, Kd of raw red mud and the CO2 neutralized red mud [9] were similar at the low initial concentration of Zn2+, demonstrating that the method of CO2 neutralization for red mud treatment was inefficient. However, Kd of red mud dramatically increased from 0.71 L/g to 42.3 L/g after hydrothermal treatment at 200 °C. The improvement of Kd value indicated enhancement of adsorption affinity and adsorption capacity of P-200 [44]. Thus, the hydrothermal method was better than that of CO2 neutralization for improving the adsorption performance of red mud.
XPS experiments were conducted to characterize P-200 before and after Zn2+ adsorption. As shown in Figure 9A, the spectrum of P-200 contained the typical peaks of Al, Si, Ca, O, Fe, and Na. After Zn2+ adsorption, the peak of Na 1s at 1072 eV disappeared (Figure 9A), and new peaks at the binding energies of 1020.7 eV and 1043.8 eV (Figure 9B) belonged to Zn2+ [45]. This demonstrated that Zn2+ was adsorbed on P-200, and that Na+ was released from P-200. During the adsorption, the amount of Na+ desorbed from P-200 showed a positive correlation with the amount of adsorbed Zn2+ on P-200 (Figure 9C). This confirmed that the adsorption of Zn2+ on P-200 was dominated by cationic exchange.
P-200 was a mixture of magnetite, hematite and Si/Al compounds, and exhibited functional sites ≡SO on its surface (S representing Fe, Si, or Al). In P-200 synthesis, Na+ attached to the surface sites to form ≡SONa+ with the addition of NaOH, which was replaced by H+ when pH decreased (Equation (3)). Therefore, both Na+ and H+ attached on P-200 surface in Zn2+ adsorption. Zn2+was divalent-charged, which showed higher affinity to ≡SO than monovalent Na+ and H+ [46], and the surface-bound Na+ or H+ were subsequently replaced (Equations (13) and (14)). The pH of the solution was equilibrated to 6.3, in which Zn was predominated in the form of Zn2+ and ZnOH+ [47]. Thus, zinc adsorption on P-200 appeared to occur via exchange of Zn2+ and ZnOH+ with surface-bond Na+ and H+ (Equations (15) and (16)). A similar observation was reported in Zn2+ adsorption on groundwater treatment sludge, which had the similar ≡SO sites [23]. Of the three obtained adsorbents, P-200 had the optimal surface sites concentration (Hs), and thus exhibited the highest adsorption capacity.
2 S O N a + + Z n 2 + S O 2 Z n 2 + + 2 N a +
2 S O H + + Z n 2 + S O 2 Z n 2 + + 2 H +
S O H + + Z n 2 + + H 2 O S O ( Z n O H ) + + 2 H +
S O N a + + Z n 2 + + H 2 O S O ( Z n O H ) + + N a + + O H
The operation cost of the adsorbent P-200 for Zn2+ adsorption was important in wastewater treatment. Synthesis of one ton of magnetic adsorbent needed 0.01 ton of ascorbic acid, 0.27 ton of caustic soda, and 45 kW h power, and the total production cost was US$ 158.8. Disposal of red mud accounted for about 5% of alumina production [48], and the alumina price was US$ 439 per ton in China [49]. The disposal cost of red mud was nearly US$ 22 per ton, which could be deducted from the production cost of P-200. Thus, the net cost of P-200 production was about US$ 136.8 per ton. For treating Zn2+-containing wastewater, the operation cost of P-200 was approximately US$ 1.45 per ton, lower than the widely used adsorbents, such as granular active carbon [50] and zero-valent nanometer iron [51], indicating that the application of P-200 for heavy metal removal was economically feasible.

4. Conclusions

Red mud is an alkaline solid waste and abundant in andradite, muscovite, hematite, and cancrinite. Red mud was converted to a magnetic adsorbent via a facile hydrothermal route using ascorbic acid as reducing agent. With hydrothermal treatment, the magnetic adsorbent was formed in the following steps: (1) the dissolution of muscovite under alkaline conditions, (2) the reductive dissolution of andradite with the generation of Fe2+, (3) the reoxidization of Fe2+ to Fe3+ by dissolved oxygen and the coprecipitation of Fe3+ and Fe2+ in the form of Fe3O4, and (4) the crystallization of cancrinite and morimotoite. By increasing the hydrothermal temperature, the reductive dissolution of andradite was promoted and the crystal size of magnetite was enlarged. When the temperature increased to 200 °C, the prepared P-200 showed a well saturation magnetization of 4.1 Am2/kg, an ideal adsorption capacity of Zn2+ (89.6 mg/g), and a high average Kd value of 16.8 L/g, and thus exhibited desirable Zn2+ adsorption under real-world conditions. Cationic exchange was the dominated mechanism for Zn2+ adsorption on P-200. Those advantages indicated that P-200 was a promising adsorbent for the treatment of Zn2+ containing wastewater.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z.; methodology, S.Z. and L.Z.; software, W.D. and K.L.; validation, D.B., J.Y., and X.Z.; formal analysis, Y.Q. and H.M.; investigation, Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, W.D.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y.; funding acquisition, D.B. and X.Z.

Funding

This work was partially funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51578118, 51678273, 51878134, and 51878133). Experimental sessions in Kulunqi plant were supported by the Science and Technology Program of Jilin Province (Granted No. 20190303001SF).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klauber, C.; Gräfe, M.; Power, G. Bauxite residue issues: II. options for residue utilization. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 108, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ye, N.; Yang, J.; Liang, S.; Hu, Y.; Hu, J.; Xiao, B.; Huang, Q. Synthesis and strength optimization of one-part geopolymer based on red mud. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 111, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jian, H.; Jie, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, G. Synthesis and characterization of red mud and rice husk ash-based geopolymer composites. Cement Concr. Compos. 2013, 37, 108–118. [Google Scholar]
  4. Davris, P.; Balomenos, E.; Panias, D.; Paspaliaris, I. Selective leaching of rare earth elements from bauxite residue (red mud), using a functionalized hydrophobic ionic liquid. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 164, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sushil, S.; Batra, V.S. Catalytic applications of red mud, an aluminium industry waste: A review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 81, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paramgura, R.K.; Rath, P.C.; Misra, V.N. Trends in red mud utilization—A review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2004, 26, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, S.; Ang, H.M.; Tadé, M.O. Novel applications of red mud as coagulant, adsorbent and catalyst for environmentally benign processes. Chemosphere 2008, 72, 1621–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Meng, X.; Zheng, L.; Gao, J. The Suppression Characteristics of NH4H2PO4/Red Mud Composite Powders on Methane Explosion. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sahu, R.C.; Patel, R.; Ray, B.C. Adsorption of Zn(II) on activated red mud: Neutralized by CO2. Desalination 2011, 266, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Shen, C. Comparison study of phosphorus adsorption on different waste solids: Fly ash, red mud and ferric-alum water treatment residues. J. Environ. Sci. China 2016, 50, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Busto, R.V.; Gonã§Alves, M.; Coelho, L.H. Assessment of the use of red mud as a catalyst for photodegradation of bisphenol A in wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 74, 1283–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Y.; Zhao, B.; Yang, T.; Wan, P.; Chen, Y.; Lv, Z. Recycling of iron from red mud by magnetic separation after co-roasting with pyrite. Thermochim. Acta 2014, 588, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, H.; Jing, L.; Zhang, B. Recovery of iron from vanadium tailings with coal-based direct reduction followed by magnetic separation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185, 1405–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Samouhos, M.; Taxiarchou, M.; Pilatos, G.; Tsakiridis, P.; Devlin, E.; Pissas, M. Controlled reduction of red mud by H2 followed by magnetic separation. Miner. Eng. 2017, 105, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sushil, S.; Alabdulrahman, A.M.; Balakrishnan, M.; Batra, V.; Blackley, R.; Clapp, J.; Hargreaves, J.; Monaghan, A.; Pulford, I.; Rico, J.; et al. Carbon deposition and phase transformations in red mud on exposure to methane. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jianmin, Z. Ferrihydrite: Surface Structure and its Effects on Phase Transformation. Clays Clay Miner. 1994, 42, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, S.; Fang, S.; Huo, M.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, X.; Geng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Bian, D.; Huo, H. A novel conversion of the groundwater treatment sludge to magnetic particles for the adsorption of methylene blue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 292, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.; Liu, N.; Qi, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Peng, Z.; Liu, G. Conversion of ferric oxide to magnetite by hydrothermal reduction in Bayer digestion process. Trans. Nonferr. Metals Soc. China 2015, 25, 3467–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, S.; Yang, J.; Song, J.; Fan, W.; Yu, H.; Bian, D.; Huo, M. Synthesis and characterization of a magnetic adsorbent from negatively-valued iron mud for methylene blue adsorption. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Echigo, T.; Aruguete, D.M.; Murayama, M.; Hochella, M. Influence of size, morphology, surface structure, and aggregation state on reductive dissolution of hematite nanoparticles with ascorbic acid. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 90, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hou, X.; Huang, X.; Ai, Z.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, L. Ascorbic acid/Fe@Fe2O3: A highly efficient combined Fenton reagent to remove organic contaminants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 310, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xin, N.; Shen, L.; Gu, H.; Jiang, S.; Xiao, J. Characteristics of hematite and fly ash during chemical looping combustion of sewage sludge. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 268, 236–244. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhu, S.; Lin, X.; Dong, G.; Yu, Y.; Yu, H.; Bian, D.; Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Huo, M. Valorization of manganese-containing groundwater treatment sludge by preparing magnetic adsorbent for Cu(II) adsorption. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 236, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lammers, K.; Smith, M.M.; Carroll, S.A. Muscovite dissolution kinetics as a function of pH at elevated temperature. Chem. Geol. 2017, 466, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cao, S.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. The phase transition in Bayer red mud from China in high caustic sodium aluminate solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2013, 140, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, R.; Zheng, S.; Ma, S.; Zhang, Y. Recovery of alumina and alkali in Bayer red mud by the formation of andradite-grossular hydrogarnet in hydrothermal process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 189, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Edgar, J.; Bell, R.G.; Dirk, W.; Hubert, K. Anion-promoted cation motion and conduction in zeolites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 558–567. [Google Scholar]
  28. Park, M.; Choi, C.L.; Lim, W.T.; Kim, M.C.; Choi, J.; Heo, N.H. Molten-salt method for the synthesis of zeolitic materials: I. Zeolite formation in alkaline molten-salt system. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2000, 37, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zeng, L.; Li, Z. Dissolution Behavior of Aluminum, Silicon, and Iron of Diaspore Concentrate in NaOH–NaAl(OH)4 Solutions at Elevated Temperature. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 18429–18439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zong, Y.; Xin, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Feng, J.; Deng, X.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, X. One-pot, template- and surfactant-free solvothermal synthesis of high-crystalline Fe3O4 nanostructures with adjustable morphologies and high magnetization. J. Magn Magn. Mater. 2016, 423, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, W.; Howe, J.Y.; Gu, B. Structure and Morphology Evolution of Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Nanoparticles in Forced Hydrolysis of Ferric Chloride. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 9203–9208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Belviso, C.; Agostinelli, E.; Belviso, S.; Cavalcante, F.; Pascucci, S.; Peddis, D.; Varvaro, G.; Fiore, S. Synthesis of magnetic zeolite at low temperature using a waste material mixture: Fly ash and red mud. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 202, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, D.; Beysen, S.; Li, Q.; Jian, J.; Sun, Y.; Jiwuer, J. Hydrothermal growth of octahedral Fe3O4 crystals. Particuology 2009, 7, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rouquerol, J.; Llewellyn, P.; Rouquerol, F. Is the BET equation applicable to microporous adsorbents. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2007, 160, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang, Q.; Yang, G.; Peng, W.; Song, S. Adsorption of Zn(II) on graphene oxide prepared from low-purity of amorphous graphite. Surf. Interface Anal. 2017, 49, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mokadem, Z.; Mekki, S.; Saïdi-Besbes, S.; Agusti, G.; Elaissari, A.; Derdour, A. Triazole containing magnetic core-silica shell nanoparticles for Pb2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ removal. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, 1039–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ferreira, L.S.; Rodrigues, M.S.; de Carvalho, J.C.M.; Finocchio, E.; Lodi, A.; Perego, P.; Converti, A. Adsorption of Ni2+, Zn2+ and Pb2+ onto dry biomass of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis and Chlorella vulgaris. I. Single metal systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vikrant, K.; Kim, K.-H. Nanomaterials for the adsorptive treatment of Hg(II) ions from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 358, 264–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Na, C.-J.; Yoo, M.-J.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, K.H. High-performance materials for effective sorptive removal of formaldehyde in air. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 366, 452–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Deng, Y.; Vellingiri, K.; Kim, K.-H.; Boukhvalov, D.W.; Philip, L. Activation strategies of metal-organic frameworks for the sorption of reduced sulfur compounds. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 350, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Eloussaief, M.; Hamza, W.; Kallel, N.; Benzina, M. Wastewaters decontamination: Mechanisms of Pb(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) competitive adsorption on tunisian smectite in single and multi-solute systems. Environ. Prog. Sustain. 2013, 32, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fan, L.; Luo, C.; Lv, Z.; Lu, F.G.; Qiu, H.M. Preparation of magnetic modified chitosan and adsorption of Zn2+ from aqueous solutions. Colloids Surf. B Biointerf. 2011, 88, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, S.G.; Xu, Q.F. Competitive adsorption of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn by different soils of Eastern China. Environ. Geol. 2009, 57, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vellingiri, K.; Kim, K.-H.; Kwon, E.E.; Deep, A.; Jo, S.H.; Szulejko, J.E. Insights into the adsorption capacity and breakthrough properties of a synthetic zeolite against a mixture of various sulfur species at low ppb levels. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 166, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Biesinger, M.C.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Sc, Ti, V, Cu and Zn. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Top, A.; Ülkü, S. Silver, zinc, and copper exchange in a Na-clinoptilolite and resulting effect on antibacterial activity. Appl. Clay Sci. 2004, 27, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Phan, T.N.T.; Louvard, N.; Bachiri, S.A.; Persello, J.; Foissy, A. Adsorption of zinc on colloidal silica, triple layer modelization and aggregation data. Colloid Surf. A 2004, 244, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Bandopadhyay, A. Innovative methodologies for the utilisation of wastes from metallurgical and allied industries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2006, 48, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sutar, H.; Mishra, S.C.; Sahoo, S.K.; Chakraverty, A.P.; Maharana, H. Progress of red mud utilization: An overview. Am. Chem. Sci. J. 2014, 4, 255–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lu, C.; Liu, C.; Rao, G.P. Comparisons of sorbent cost for the removal of Ni2+ from aqueous solution by carbon nanotubes and granular activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, S.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W. Zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) for the treatment of smelting wastewater: A pilot-scale demonstration. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 254, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of the red mud, P-120, P-200 and P-270. In the figure, the peak was numbered: 1: andradite; 2: hematite; 3: magnetite; 4: Morimotoite; 5: cancrinite; 6: muscovite; 7: clinochlore.
Figure 1. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of the red mud, P-120, P-200 and P-270. In the figure, the peak was numbered: 1: andradite; 2: hematite; 3: magnetite; 4: Morimotoite; 5: cancrinite; 6: muscovite; 7: clinochlore.
Applsci 09 01519 g001
Figure 2. Magnetic hysteresis curves of red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270.
Figure 2. Magnetic hysteresis curves of red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270.
Applsci 09 01519 g002
Figure 3. (A) Composition of red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270, and (B) the major cationic concentrations in the supernatant after hydrothermal treatment.
Figure 3. (A) Composition of red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270, and (B) the major cationic concentrations in the supernatant after hydrothermal treatment.
Applsci 09 01519 g003
Figure 4. The proposed conversion route of iron mud into magnetic adsorbent. Step 1 represents the reductive dissolution of red mud; Step 2 represents the oxidization of ferrous Fe; Steps 3 to 5 represent the crystallization of magnetite, morimotoite, and cancrinite, respectively.
Figure 4. The proposed conversion route of iron mud into magnetic adsorbent. Step 1 represents the reductive dissolution of red mud; Step 2 represents the oxidization of ferrous Fe; Steps 3 to 5 represent the crystallization of magnetite, morimotoite, and cancrinite, respectively.
Applsci 09 01519 g004
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (A) red mud, (B) P-120, (C) P-200, and (D) P-270.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (A) red mud, (B) P-120, (C) P-200, and (D) P-270.
Applsci 09 01519 g005
Figure 6. Adsorption isotherm of Zn2+ on red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270. Experimental conditions: equilibrium time: 12 h, P-200 dosage: 0.01 g, initial pH: 4.
Figure 6. Adsorption isotherm of Zn2+ on red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270. Experimental conditions: equilibrium time: 12 h, P-200 dosage: 0.01 g, initial pH: 4.
Applsci 09 01519 g006
Figure 7. Gran plots of red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270.
Figure 7. Gran plots of red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270.
Applsci 09 01519 g007
Figure 8. (A) Kd and (B) Kd medium values of Zn2+ on the red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270.
Figure 8. (A) Kd and (B) Kd medium values of Zn2+ on the red mud, P-120, P-200, and P-270.
Applsci 09 01519 g008
Figure 9. (A) Full range and (B) Zn 2p XPS spectra of P-200 before and after Zn2+ adsorption, and (C) amount of Na+ desorbed as affected by Zn2+ adsorption on P-200. Experimental conditions: equilibrium time: 12 h, P-200 dosage: 0.01 g, initial pH: 4.
Figure 9. (A) Full range and (B) Zn 2p XPS spectra of P-200 before and after Zn2+ adsorption, and (C) amount of Na+ desorbed as affected by Zn2+ adsorption on P-200. Experimental conditions: equilibrium time: 12 h, P-200 dosage: 0.01 g, initial pH: 4.
Applsci 09 01519 g009
Table 1. Parameters of the isotherm models and the surface sites concentrations of red mud and the obtained adsorbents.
Table 1. Parameters of the isotherm models and the surface sites concentrations of red mud and the obtained adsorbents.
AdsorbentLangmuirFreundlichHs
qm/(mg/g)KL/(L/mg)R2KF/(mg/g)1/nR2mmol/g
Red mud11.430.140.9984.360.20.8460.51
P-12021.910.370.99811.570.150.9411.19
P-20089.610.440.99849.260.110.7154.35
P-27056.790.420.99733.980.120.7623.29
Table 2. Comparison of distribution coefficients of Zn2+ on the red mud, P-120, P-200, P-270, and other adsorbents.
Table 2. Comparison of distribution coefficients of Zn2+ on the red mud, P-120, P-200, P-270, and other adsorbents.
AdsorbentInitial pHDosage (g/L)Initial Concentration (mg/L)Equilibrium Adsorption Capacity (mg/g)Distribution Coefficient (L/g)Maximum Adsorption Capacity (mg/g)Reference
Red mud41156.220.7111.43This study
459.680.27
12010.640.1
P-120411512.855.9821.91
4519.760.78
12021.520.22
P-200411514.6542.389.61
4542.6217.92
12085.782.51
P-270411513.912.6456.79
4538.555.98
12054.950.84
Graphene oxide70.651014.2414.2973[35]
2024.487.06
5053.863.3
Triazole containing magnetic core-silica shell nanoparticles5.516032.091.2451.2[36]
9039.110.74
17044.930.36
30049.340.18
Dry mass of A. platensis5.0–5.5232.7110.991.0339.5[37]
65.4118.640.66
130.8225.120.31
Dry mass of C. vulgaris5.0–5.5232.7111.91.3360
65.4121.190.92
130.8235.910.61
Magnetic modified chitosan50.315017.020.1132.16[42]
30022.440.07
40025.340.06
Tunisian smectite5.586570.7528[41]
909.250.69
12012.120.63
30025.570.28
Red mud after CO2 neutralization62124.341.4314.9[9]
206.831.23
258.050.88

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, W.; Liang, K.; Qin, Y.; Ma, H.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, S.; Yu, Y.; Bian, D.; Yang, J. Hydrothermal Conversion of Red Mud into Magnetic Adsorbent for Effective Adsorption of Zn(II) in Water. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081519

AMA Style

Dong W, Liang K, Qin Y, Ma H, Zhao X, Zhang L, Zhu S, Yu Y, Bian D, Yang J. Hydrothermal Conversion of Red Mud into Magnetic Adsorbent for Effective Adsorption of Zn(II) in Water. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(8):1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Wenqing, Kun Liang, Yanyi Qin, Huijia Ma, Xuan Zhao, Leilei Zhang, Suiyi Zhu, Yang Yu, Dejun Bian, and Jiakuan Yang. 2019. "Hydrothermal Conversion of Red Mud into Magnetic Adsorbent for Effective Adsorption of Zn(II) in Water" Applied Sciences 9, no. 8: 1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081519

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop