Next Article in Journal
Understanding Camellia sinensis using Omics Technologies along with Endophytic Bacteria and Environmental Roles on Metabolism: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Decision Support Models for Operations and Maintenance for Offshore Wind Farms: A Review
Article Menu
Issue 2 (January-2) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(2), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9020279

Hemodynamic Interference of Serial Stenoses and Its Impact on FFR and iFR Measurements

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0656, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 November 2018 / Revised: 3 January 2019 / Accepted: 8 January 2019 / Published: 14 January 2019
Full-Text   |   PDF [3453 KB, uploaded 14 January 2019]   |  

Abstract

The hemodynamic interference of serial stenoses poses challenges for identifying the functional severity using the fractional flow reserve (FFR) method. The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), i.e., the distal-to-proximal pressure ratio at 75% of diastole, was recently proposed to overcome the disadvantages of the FFR. However, the underlying mechanism remained ambiguous due to the lack of quantitative definition of hemodynamic interference. The objective of this study is to quantitatively define the hemodynamic interference and then examine its role on the FFR and iFR measurements. Pressure distributions, velocity fields, and Q-criterion which identifies vortices, were obtained through the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for five cases with spacing ratios at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10. The hemodynamic interference was identified using vortex structures which were quantified by Q-criterion. Results have shown that a spacing ratio of 7 or larger was interference-free. Serial stenoses with a closer spacing ratio led to a larger hemodynamic interference, and thus, larger errors in the FFR measurements compared to the spacing ratio of 7. Moreover, the underestimation of the first stenosis lesion has been observed, even in interference-free cases due to the nature of hyperemia. However, the hemodynamic interference of the serial stenoses has a negligible impact on the iFR measurement, regardless of the spacing ratio. Our results demonstrated that the quantification of the hemodynamic interference in serial stenoses provided a better understanding of its role on the pressure measurements, which could be further exploited for the optimal treatment of serial stenoses. View Full-Text
Keywords: serial stenoses; hemodynamic interference; fractional flow reserve (FFR); instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR); local pressure fluctuation; pressure recovery; vortex structures; computational fluid dynamics (CFD) serial stenoses; hemodynamic interference; fractional flow reserve (FFR); instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR); local pressure fluctuation; pressure recovery; vortex structures; computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ju, S.; Gu, L. Hemodynamic Interference of Serial Stenoses and Its Impact on FFR and iFR Measurements. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 279.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Appl. Sci. EISSN 2076-3417 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top