Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Axial Compression Behavior and Bearing Capacity Analysis of High Titanium Slag CFST Columns
Previous Article in Journal
An Eight-Zonal Piezoelectric Tube-Type Threaded Ultrasonic Motor Based on Second-Order Bending Mode
Previous Article in Special Issue
Parametrical Non-Complex Tests to Evaluate Partial Decentralized Linear-Output Feedback Control Stabilization Conditions from Their Centralized Stabilization Counterparts
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview

Short Overview of Early Developments of the Hardy Cross Type Methods for Computation of Flow Distribution in Pipe Networks

1,2,3,*,† and 1,2,*
1
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy
2
IT4Innovations, VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
3
Research and Development Center “Alfatec”, 18000 Niš, Serbia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
On a short visit at IT4Innovations, VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(10), 2019; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102019
Received: 9 March 2019 / Revised: 10 April 2019 / Accepted: 16 April 2019 / Published: 16 May 2019
  |  
PDF [1720 KB, uploaded 16 May 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Hardy Cross originally proposed a method for analysis of flow in networks of conduits or conductors in 1936. His method was the first really useful engineering method in the field of pipe network calculation. Only electrical analogs of hydraulic networks were used before the Hardy Cross method. A problem with flow resistance versus electrical resistance makes these electrical analog methods obsolete. The method by Hardy Cross is taught extensively at faculties, and it remains an important tool for the analysis of looped pipe systems. Engineers today mostly use a modified Hardy Cross method that considers the whole looped network of pipes simultaneously (use of these methods without computers is practically impossible). A method from a Russian practice published during the 1930s, which is similar to the Hardy Cross method, is described, too. Some notes from the work of Hardy Cross are also presented. Finally, an improved version of the Hardy Cross method, which significantly reduces the number of iterations, is presented and discussed. We also tested multi-point iterative methods, which can be used as a substitution for the Newton–Raphson approach used by Hardy Cross, but in this case this approach did not reduce the number of iterations. Although many new models have been developed since the time of Hardy Cross, the main purpose of this paper is to illustrate the very beginning of modeling of gas and water pipe networks and ventilation systems. As a novelty, a new multi-point iterative solver is introduced and compared with the standard Newton–Raphson iterative method. View Full-Text
Keywords: Hardy Cross method; pipe networks; piping systems; hydraulic networks; gas distribution Hardy Cross method; pipe networks; piping systems; hydraulic networks; gas distribution
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Brkić, D.; Praks, P. Short Overview of Early Developments of the Hardy Cross Type Methods for Computation of Flow Distribution in Pipe Networks. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2019.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Appl. Sci. EISSN 2076-3417 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top