Next Article in Journal
Head Pose Detection for a Wearable Parrot-Inspired Robot Based on Deep Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Nanoparticles Materials on Heat Transfer in Electro-Insulating Liquids
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen-Enriched Carbon Nanofibers Derived from Polyaniline and Their Capacitive Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Hydrophobicity on the Self-Assembly Behavior of Urea Benzene Derivatives in Aqueous Solution

1
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
2
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Showa Pharmaceutical University, Machida 194-8543, Japan
3
PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi 332-0012, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(7), 1080; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071080
Submission received: 10 June 2018 / Revised: 27 June 2018 / Accepted: 2 July 2018 / Published: 3 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heat Transfer across Nanoparticles)

Abstract

:
Urea benzene derivatives (UBD) with amphiphilic side chains showed self-assembly behavior in aqueous solution to form nanoparticles ~100 nm in size. Subsequent thermal treatment led to additional self-assembly of the nanoparticles due to dehydration of the amphiphilic side chains, producing microparticles. This self-assembly process was accompanied by a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior, as revealed by the abrupt decrease in solution transmittance. In this study, three UBD (UBD-13) with different lengths of the alkyl segment in the amphiphilic side chain (namely, hexyl, heptyl, and octyl, respectively) were prepared to investigate the self-assembly behavior in aqueous solution. UBD-13 formed identical nanoparticles, with sizes in the 10~80 nm range but with different LCST values in the order 3 < 2 < 1. These results suggest a relationship between the hydrophobicity and the self-assembly behavior of UBD.

1. Introduction

Biomimetic chemistry can help in the further development of the medical field [1]. Artificial soft materials such as gels and nanoparticles are essential and have been applied in medical and pharmaceutical chemistry. For example, hydrogels [2,3] have been used in artificial joints, corneas, and stents. In addition, functional nanoparticles that can accumulate at a specific target site and release therapeutic agents have become essential tools in drug delivery systems (DDS) [4,5,6]. Because of their so-called “enhanced permeability and retention (EPR)” effect, that is, the ability to reach the interstitial spaces (10–500 nm) of tumor tissues [7,8,9], over the past three decades, nanoparticles have emerged as attractive DDS for anticancer drugs. Moreover, the acidic microenvironment of tumor cells, due to the Warburg effect [10,11], facilitates the accumulation of nanoparticles in the target tissue. We have previously reported the self-assembly behavior of urea benzene derivatives (UBD) in aqueous solution to form nanoparticles [12], which can undergo an additional heat-induced self-assembly to produce microparticles. This is accompanied by a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior, resulting in a turbid solution. In addition, UBD have been used in our laboratory for the development of functional materials; namely, radical nanoparticles have been employed for metal-free magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents [13], and push-pull-type, aminoquinoline-based fluorescent probes have been constructed for bioimaging applications [14,15,16,17,18]. Among the latter, we have successfully developed a tumor-imaging probe activated by heat treatment [19].
In this study, three UBD (UBD-13) with different alkyl chain lengths (hexyl, heptyl, and octyl, respectively) were prepared to investigate the self-assembly behavior in aqueous solution [20,21]. Although nanoparticle formation was observed in all cases, the existence of a critical aggregation concentration (CAC) was indicative of the effect of the alkyl chain length. Herein, we describe the relationship between the self-assembly behavior and the alkyl chain length of UBD-13.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of UBD-13

UBD-13 contain an amphiphilic chain consisting of hexaethylene glycol and an alkyl chain of different lengths. For the synthesis of the amphiphilic chain, the corresponding dibromoalkane was reacted with hexaethylene glycol monomethyl ether under basic conditions. The resulting chain having a terminal bromine was converted to the phthalimide derivative, which was then reduced to obtain the corresponding amine. This was treated with phenyl isocyanate in toluene to afford the desired UBD, in which the phenyl group and the amphiphilic chain are linked by a urea moiety. The synthetic route to UBD-13 is shown in Scheme 1.

2.2. Self-Assembly Behavior in Aqueous Solution

2.2.1. 1H NMR spectra in D2O

The prepared UBD-13 underwent self-assembly in aqueous solution to form aggregates. To determine the critical aggregation concentrations (CACs), the concentration dependence of the 1H NMR spectra in D2O was investigated, and the spectral changes for UBD-1 having a hexyl chain are shown in Figure 1a,b.
The signals corresponding to the alkyl, ethylene glycol, and phenyl moieties were observed in the ranges of 1.1–1.6, 3.0–3.7, and 6.9–7.5 ppm, respectively. For concentrations between 0.25 and 20 mM, no chemical shift changes were observed, indicating that UBD-1 was in the monomeric form in this concentration range. Above 20 mM, the proton peaks of the alkyl and ethylene glycol chains as well as some phenyl signals shifted to higher shielding and broadened, suggesting a concentration dependence. In contrast, the aromatic protons in the ortho position (Ho in Scheme 1) were deshielded. These shielding [13,19,22] and deshielding shifts [13,19,23] typically derive from the formation of aggregates and the interaction via hydrogen bond between urea moiety and Ho atoms in the phenyl ring, respectively. The chemical shift of the aromatic protons in the meta position (Hm in Scheme 1) was plotted as a function of the concentration, and a breaking point was observed at 16 mM (Figure 1c), which corresponds to the CAC of UBD-1. Notably, compared to UBD-1, UBD-2 and -3 with heptyl and octyl chains, respectively (Figure S1), showed a similar concentration dependence but different CAC values (9.0 and 2.0 mM, respectively), indicating that the CAC depended on the hydrophobicity of the amphiphilic chain. As expected, a longer chain was associated with a smaller CAC value. For all UBD, the 1H NMR spectral changes with concentration are shown in Figure 1 and Figure S1, and the chemical shift changes of the meta protons are shown in Figure 1c. Moreover, the CAC and LCST values are summarized in Table 1.

2.2.2. Size Distribution and Morphology of UBD-13 by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

The size distribution and morphology of the resulting UBD-13 aggregates in aqueous solution were determined by DLS and TEM. The DLS spectrum of a 20 mM UBD-1 solution at 20 °C showed a broad peak corresponding to a hydrodynamic diameter (DH) of approximately 30 nm (Figure 2a). At 90 °C, the peak shifted to about 200 nm, indicating that the aggregate size (DH value) was temperature dependent, increasing with increasing temperature. The temperature dependence of the DH values for UBD-1 is illustrated in Figure S2, which also shows the transmittance changes (vide infra). A similar temperature dependence of the size distribution was observed for UBD-2 and -3 aggregates (10 mM). At 20 °C, UBD-2 and -3 had a size of approximately 20 nm and 70 nm, respectively, and at 30 °C, the DH values shifted to larger sizes, namely, ~1500 and ~4000 nm, respectively (Figure 2b). The temperature-dependent change in size distribution for UBD-1 is shown in Figure 2a, and for all UBD, the temperature dependence of DH is shown in Figure 2c.
The TEM images of UBD were obtained using uranyl acetate as a negative staining agent and the dried samples prepared according to previous reports [12,13,19]. As can be seen from the images shown in Figure 3, for all UBD, spherical nanoparticles with sizes in the 10–80 nm range were observed. The size difference between DLS and TEM measurements could be attributed to the presence or absence of water molecules in the nanoparticles, indicating that UBD-13 formed spherical nanoparticles 10–80 nm in size in aqueous solution. The TEM images of all UBD are shown in Figure 3.

2.2.3. Additional Heat-Induced Self-Assembly

The hexaethylene glycol chain of UBD formed hydrogen bonds with water molecules and can undergo dehydration by thermal treatment, resulting in an entropy-driven self-assembly process [24,25]. To examine this heat-induced self-assembly behavior of the nanoparticles, the temperature dependence of the transmittance was measured. For 10, 15, and 20 mM solutions of UBD-1, an abrupt decrease in transmittance was detected, with LCST at 71, 51, and 38 °C, respectively. On the other hand, at concentrations below 10 mM, the transmittance decreased gradually (Figure 4a). It should be noted that similar LCST behavior and concentration dependence were observed for UBD-2 and -3. Namely, in the case of 5, 10, and 20 mM solutions of UBD-2, the LCSTs were found at 57, 29, and 26 °C, whereas for 3, 7, and 10 mM solutions of UBD-3, LCSTs at 27, 23, and 23 °C were observed. At a specific concentration (10 mM) of UBD-13, the LCSTs followed the order UBD-3 < 2 < 1, indicating that longer alkyl chains provide lower cloud points [26,27] due to hydrophobic effects (Figure 4b). The LCST behavior of UBD is shown in Figure 4 and Figure S3, and the LCST values are summarized in Table 1.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Experimental

Instruments: Infrared spectra for freeze-dry samples of UBD-1, -2, and -3 were recorded on a JASCO 420 FT-IR spectrometer (Figure S4) [28,29]. UV-Vis spectra were recorded on a JASCO V570 spectrometer equipped with a JASCO 420 temperature controller. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker Biospin AVANCE III 500 spectrometer or a Varian 500 Fourier transform NMR spectrometer using CDCl3, CD3OD, or D2O as a solvent and referenced to tetramethylsilane or 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid. DLS measurements were performed with a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument with a helium-neon laser (wavelength: 633 nm) at a scattering angle of 173°. High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectra were recorded using a Bruker Daltonics microTOF mass spectrometer. TEM images were obtained using a FEI Tecnai F20 transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV. Samples for TEM observations were prepared by dropping the UBD solutions on a carbon-coated copper grid, followed by staining with uranyl acetate, and drying at room temperature. The LCST behavior of the UBD solutions was investigated by monitoring the change in the cloud point, which was determined by the inflection point of the transmittance at 800 nm as a function of temperature. The temperature of the sample in a cuvette was set at 10 °C and increased by increments of 1 °C up to a final temperature of 85 °C. Each measurement was obtained after maintaining the temperature for 120 s. Elemental analyses were performed using a Perkin Elmer 2400 II analyzer at the Center for Industry, University and Government Cooperation, Nagasaki University.

3.2. Materials

26-bromo-2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxahexacosane (Eg6C6Br)
To a solution of 1,6-dibromohexane (5.93 mL, 39.1 mmol) and 60% sodium hydride (0.939 g, 23.5 mmol) in 8.5 mL THF was added dropwise to a solution of hexaethylene glycol monomethyl ether (2.32 g, 7.83 mmol) in 8.5 mL THF while stirring in an ice bath, and the mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The resulting solution was diluted with a mixture of MeOH and saturated ammonium chloride aqueous solution and then extracted three times with Et2O. The combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4 and evaporated. The resulting residue was chromatographed on silica gel with n-hexane/AcOEt (100:5–100:30) as the eluent to afford Eg6C6Br as a colorless oil in 81.9% yield (2.95 g, 6.42 mmol). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 270 MHz) δ 3.63–3.26 (m, 24H), 3.59–3.53 (m, 2H), 3.46 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 1.89–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.62–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.40–1.36 (m, 4H). The 1H NMR spectrum was consistent with that previously reported [19].
27-bromo-2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxaheptacosane (Eg6C7Br)
Eg6C7Br was prepared in a manner similar to that described for Eg6C6Br, using dibromoheptane instead of dibromohexane. The reaction yield was 66.4%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 3.53–3.49 (m, 22H), 3.47–3.46 (m, 2H), 3.44–3.42 (m, 2H), 3.38 (t, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 1.49–1.46 (m, 2H), 1.37–1.36 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.27 (m, 6H). HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C20H41BrNaO7 [M + Na]+: m/z 495.1833, Found: 475.1819.
28-bromo-2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxaoctacosane (Eg6C8Br)
Eg6C8Br was prepared in a manner similar to that described for Eg6C6Br, using dibromooctane instead of dibromohexane. The reaction yield was 67.7%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 3.65–3.64 (m, 20H), 3.58–3.54 (m, 4H), 3.46–3.39 (m, 4H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 1.88–1.82 (m, 2H), 1.60–1.54 (m, 2H), 1.46–1.38 (s, 2H), 1.31 (m, 6H). HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C21H43BrNaO7 [M + Na]+: m/z 509.2090, Found: 509.2046.
2-(2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxahexacosan-26-yl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (Eg6C6NPht)
A mixture of Eg6C6Br (2.94 g, 6.40 mmol) and potassium phthalimide (1.30 g, 7.04 mmol) in 49.3 mL DMF was stirred at 110 °C for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature, the resulting solution was evaporated and diluted with water. The obtained mixture was extracted three times with Et2O and the combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to afford Eg6C6NPht as a colorless oil in 73.5% yield (2.47 g, 4.70 mmol). IR (Neat on NaCl) 3465, 2932, 2862, 1716, 1606, 1459, 1399, 1360, 1302, 1251, 1104, 721 cm−1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 270 MHz) δ 7.86–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.72–7.69 (m, 2H), 3.70–3.61 (m, 20H), 3.58–3.53 (m, 4H), 3.46–3.41 (t, J = 6.75 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 1.70–1.65 (m, 4H), 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.38–1.36 (m, 4H). The 1H NMR spectrum was consistent with that previously reported [19].
2-(2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxaheptacosan-27-yl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (Eg6C7NPht)
Eg6C7NPht was prepared in a manner similar to that described for Eg6C6NPht, using Eg6C7Br instead of Eg6C6Br. The reaction yield was 76.7%. IR (neat on NaCl) 3517, 2930, 2863, 1771, 1713, 1635, 1467, 1438, 1396, 1369, 1108, 722 cm−1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.85–7.83 (dd, J = 5.45, 3.05 Hz, 2H), 7.71–7.70 (dd, J = 5.45, 3.00 Hz, 2H), 3.69–3.62 (m, 20H), 3.57–3.54 (m, 4H), 3.44–3.42 (t, J = 6.78 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 1.70–1.64 (m, 4H), 1.59–1.54 (m, 2H), 1.34–1.30 (m, 6H). HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C28H45NNaO9 [M + Na]+: m/z 562.2992, Found: 562.3199.
2-(2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxaoctacosan-28-yl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (Eg6C8NPht)
Eg6C8NPht was prepared in a manner similar to that described for Eg6C6NPht, using Eg6C8Br instead of Eg6C6Br. The reaction yield was 94.7%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.85–7.83 (dd, J = 5.45, 3.05 Hz, 2H), 7.71–7.70 (dd, J = 5.4, 3.00 Hz, 2H), 3.68–3.62 (m, 20H), 3.58–3.54 (m, 4H), 3.44–3.42 (t, J = 6.85 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 1.68–1.64 (m, 2H), 1.58–1.53 (m, 2H), 1.33–1.30 (m, 10H). HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C29H47NNaO9 [M + Na]+: m/z 576.3149, Found: 576.3349.
2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxahexacosan-26-amine (Eg6C6NH2)
To a solution of Eg6C6NPht (4.69 g, 8.92 mmol) in 40 mL EtOH, hydrazine monohydrate (1.73 mL, 35.7 mmol) was added dropwise, and the mixture was refluxed for 2 h. The resulting solution was cooled to room temperature and evaporated to afford a white solid. The residue was dissolved with Et2O and filtered over Celite. After evaporation of the filtrate, the residue was chromatographed on silica gel with CH2Cl2/MeOH/trimethylamine (1:0.02:0.05) as the eluent to afford Eg6C6NH2 as a pale yellow transparent oil in 97.8% yield (3.57 g, 9.03 mmol). IR (neat on NaCl) 3429, 2933, 2862, 1646, 1567, 1461, 1352, 1246, 1105, 938, 847 cm−1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 270 MHz) δ 3.66–3.62 (m, 20H), 3.59–3.53 (m, 4H), 3.45 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 2.71 (t, J = 6.75 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (m, 2H), 1.59–1.56 (t, J = 4.05 Hz, 2H), 1.45–1.25 (m, 6H). HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C19H42NO7 [M + H]+: m/z 396.2961, Found: 396.3093.
2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxaheptacosan-27-amine (Eg6C7NH2)
Eg6C7NH2 was prepared in a manner similar to that described for Eg6C6NH2, using Eg6C7NPht instead of Eg6C6NPht. The reaction yield was 86.2%. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 270 MHz) δ 3.53–3.50 (m, 24H), 3.49–3.30 (m, 2H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 2.71–2.69 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (m, 4H), 1.50–1.45 (t, J = 12.5 Hz, 2H), 1.40–1.30 (m, 4H), 1.19–1.13 (m, 2H). HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C20H44NO7 [M + H]+: m/z 410.3118, Found: 410.2994.
2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxaoctacosan-28-amine (Eg6C8NH2)
Eg6C8NH2 was prepared in a manner similar to that described for Eg6C6NH2, using Eg6C8NPht instead of Eg6C6NPht. The reaction yield was 81.8%. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 3.51–3.50 (m, 16H), 3.47–3.45 (m, 2H), 3.45–3.41 (m, 2H), 3.40–3.23 (m, 6H), 3.24 (s, 3H), 2.60–2.56 (t, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 1.49–1.46 (m, 2H), 1.40–1.36 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.20 (m, 6H). HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C21H46NO7 [M + H]+: m/z 424.3274, Found: 424.3145.
1-(2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxahexacosan-26-yl)-3-phenylurea (UBD-1)
To a solution of phenyl isocyanate (52.9 mg, 0.44 mmol) in 1 mL toluene, a solution of Eg6C6NH2 (200 mg, 0.49 mmol) in 1 mL CH2Cl2 was added dropwise while stirring in an ice bath. The mixture was stirred overnight, allowing it to reach room temperature. The resulting solution was evaporated and chromatographed on silica gel with CH2Cl2/MeOH (10:1) as the eluent to afford 189 mg of mono-PhC6 as a colorless oil in 82.6% yield. IR (neat on NaCl) 3348, 2931, 2864, 1696, 1668, 1597, 1553, 1500, 1441, 1350, 1311, 1238, 1109, 949, 850 cm−1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 8.35 (s, 1H), 7.38–7.37 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.21–7.18 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.89–6.85 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.09–6.07 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.50–3.49 (m, 20H), 3.46–3.45 (m, 2H), 3.43–3.41 (m, 2H), 3.39–3.36 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 3.08–3.03 (q, J = 12.7, 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.51–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.43–1.40 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.29 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 126 MHz) δ 155.21, 140.61, 128.62, 120.90, 117.56, 71.29, 70.29, 69.81, 69.60, 69.50, 58.06, 39.52, 29.76, 29.21, 26.25, 25.45. HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C26H46N2NaO8 [M + Na]+: m/z 537.3152, Found: 537.3259.
1-(2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxaheptacosan-27-yl)-3-phenylurea (UBD-2)
UBD-2 was prepared in a manner similar to that described for mono-PhC6, using Eg6C7NH2 instead of Eg6C6NH2. The reaction yield was 91.5%. IR (neat on NaCl) 3306, 2929, 2864, 1686, 1597, 1551, 1500, 1442, 1351, 1313, 1239, 1106, 952, 849 cm−1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 8.36 (s, 1H), 7.37–7.35 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.20–7.18 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 2H), 6.87–6.86 (t, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.10–6.08 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.50–3.49 (m, 24H), 3.47–3.45 (m, 2H), 3.43–3.41 (m, 2H), 3.38–3.34 (t, J = 10.3 Hz, 2H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 3.08–3.04 (q, J = 12.7, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.50–1.47 (m, 2H), 1.43–1.40 (m, 2H), 1.28 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (DMSO, 126 MHz) δ 155.23, 140.60, 128.64, 120.93, 117.58, 71.29, 70.32, 69.81, 69.60, 69.50, 58.07, 39.25, 29.72, 29.17, 28.61, 26.37, 25.66. HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C27H48N2NaO8 [M + Na]+: m/z 537.3308, Found: 551.3323. Anal. Calcd. for C27H48N2O8: C, 61.34; H, 9.15; N, 5.30, Found: C, 61.33; H, 9.26; N, 5.44.
1-(2,5,8,11,14,17,20-heptaoxaoctacosan-28-yl)-3-phenylurea (UBD-3)
UBD-3 was prepared in a manner similar to that described for mono-PhC6, using Eg6C8NH2 instead of Eg6C6NH2. The reaction yield was 45.6%. IR (neat on KBr) 3303, 2927, 2860, 1685, 1597, 1551, 1450, 1441, 1351, 1312, 1236, 1106, 951, 849 cm−1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 8.35 (s, 1H), 7.37–7.35 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 7.21–7.18 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 6.88–6.85 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.09–6.07 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.50–3.46 (m, 24H), 3.46–3.44 (m, 2H), 3.43–3.41 (m, 2H), 3.38–3.36 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 3.08–3.04 (q, J = 12.8, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.50–1.46 (m, 2H), 1.42–1.40 (m, 2H), 1.27 (m, 8H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 126 MHz) δ 155.22, 140.60, 128.63, 120.92, 117.57, 71.30, 70.33, 69.81, 69.60, 69.50, 58.07, 39.25, 29.76, 29.22, 28.88, 28.79, 26.36, 25.64. HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C27H48N2NaO8 [M + Na]+: m/z 565.3465, Found: 565.3577. Anal. Calcd. for C28H50N2O8: C, 61.97; H, 9.29; N, 5.16, Found: C, 61.68; H, 9.43; N, 5.04.

4. Conclusions

To investigate the self-assembly behavior of UBD containing an amphiphilic chain in aqueous solution, three UBD (UBD-1–3) with different alkyl chain lengths, namely, hexyl, heptyl, and octyl, respectively, were prepared. All UBD formed identical spherical nanoparticles at concentrations above the CAC. Moreover, the size of the nanoparticles increased with increasing temperature because of the enhanced hydrophobic interactions due to dehydration of the ethylene glycol chains. In addition, the transmittance of the UBD solutions abruptly decreased, indicating an LCST behavior. A comparison of the CAC and LCST of the three UBD revealed that UBD-3 exhibited the smallest CAC and the largest LCST values, suggesting a relationship between the hydrophobicity of the UBD and its self-assembly behavior. Studies with varying concentrations of UBD (Figure 5, left scheme) revealed an equilibrium between the monomer and the nanoparticles. On the other hand, by varying the temperature (Figure 5, right scheme), the dehydration process was responsible for the formation of larger particles, which were in equilibrium with the nanoparticles. In the future, we plan to synthesize nanoparticles having functional groups for bioimaging [30] and investigate the self-assembly behavior of nanoparticles bearing different numbers of amphiphilic side chains.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/7/1080/s1, Concentration dependence of the 1H NMR spectra of UBD-2 and -3. Temperature dependence of the DH values and transmittance changes for UBD-1. Temperature dependence of the LCST behavior of UBD-2 and -3. FTIR spectra of the freeze-dry samples of UBD-1, -2, and -3.

Author Contributions

S.K. designed the experiments, conceived and supervised the project, analyzed the final data, and wrote the manuscript. Y.O., K.M., Y.F., and S.K. performed the experiments and analyzed the data to investigate the properties and mechanistic behavior of the materials. Y.F. checked the data and the manuscript, and discussed the results with the corresponding author.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Noboru Koga for the helpful discussions. This work was partially supported by the PRESTO Program on Molecular Technology from the Japan Science Technology Agency (JST).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moro, T.; Takatori, Y.; Ishihara, K.; Konno, T.; Takigawa, Y.; Matsushiba, T.; Chung, U.I.; Nakamura, K.; Kawaguchi, H. Surface grafting of artificial joints with a biocompatible polymer for preventing periprosthetic osteolysis. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aoki, D.; Ajiro, D. Design of Polyurethane Composed of Only Hard Main Chain with Oligo(ethylene glycol) Units as Side Chain Simultaneously Achieved High Biocompatible and Mechanical Properties. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 6529–6538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fujiyabu, T.; Li, X.; Shibayama, M.; Chung, U.; Sakai, T. Permeation of Water through Hydrogels with Controlled Network Structure. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 9411–9416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Allen, T.M.; Cullis, P.R. Drug delivery systems: Entering the mainstream. Science 2004, 303, 1818–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Park, K.; Lee, S.; Kang, E.; Kim, K.; Choi, K.; Kwon, I.C. New Generation of Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 1553–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matsumura, Y.; Maeda, H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: Mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 1986, 46, 6387–6392. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Maeda, H.; Wu, J.; Sawa, T.; Matsumura, Y.; Hori, K. Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: A review. J. Control. Release 2000, 65, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jain, R.K. Transport of molecules across tumor vasculature. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1987, 6, 559–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fox, M.E.; Szoka, F.C.; Fréchet, J.M.J. Soluble Polymer Carriers for the Treatment of Cancer: The Importance of Molecular Architecture. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1141–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Tannock, I.F.; Rotin, D. Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 4373–4384. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Li, Q.; Dunn, E.T.; Grandmaison, E.W.; Goosen, M.F.A. Applications and properties of chitosan. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 1992, 7, 370–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hayashi, H.; Ohkubo, K.; Karasawa, S.; Koga, N. Assemblies of Functional Small-Sized Molecules Having 4-Amio-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl Responsive to Heat and pH in Water and Their Water Proton Relaxivities. Langmuir 2011, 27, 12709–12719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morishita, K.; Murayama, S.; Araki, T.; Aoki, I.; Karasawa, S. Thermal- and pH-Dependent Size Variable Radical Nanoparticles and Its Water Proton Relaxivity for Metal-Free MRI Functional Contrast Agents. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 8351–8362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Abe, Y.; Karasawa, S.; Koga, N. Crystal Structures and Emitting Properties of Trifluoromethylaminoquinoline Derivatives: Thermal Single-Crystal-to-Single-Crystal Transformation of Polymorphic Crystals That Emit Different Colors. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 15038–15048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Karasawa, S.; Todo, J.; Usui, K.; Harada, N.; Yoza, K.; Suemune, H.; Koga, N. Regioselective Photocyclizations of Di(quinolinyl)arylamines and Tri(quinolinyl)amine with Emission Color Changes and Photoreaction-induced Self-assemblies. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 7771–7781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Karasawa, S.; Hagihara, R.; Abe, Y.; Harada, N.; Todo, J.; Koga, N. Structures, Thermal Properties, and Emission Behaviors of N,N-R-Phenyl-7-amino-2,4-trifluoromethylquinoline Derivatives: Supercooled Liquid-to-Crystal Transformation Induced by Mechanical Stimuli. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 2468–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Harada, N.; Abe, Y.; Karasawa, S.; Koga, N. Polymorphic Equilibrium Responsive Thermal and Mechanical Stimuli in Light-emitting Crystals of N-Methylaminonaphthyridine. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 6282–6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hagihara, R.; Usui, K.; Karasawa, S. Two-step transformation of p-anisolylaminoquinoline derivatives induced by conformation- and packing-dominated processes. Dyes Pigments 2017, 143, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Araki, T.; Murayama, S.; Usui, K.; Shimada, T.; Aoki, I.; Karasawa, S. Self-Assembly Behavior of Emissive Urea Benzene Derivatives Enables Heat-Induced Accumulation in Tumor Tissue. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 2397–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Allampally, N.A.; Florian, A.; Mayoral, M.A.; Rest, C.; Stepanenko, V.; Fernández, G. H-Aggregates of Oligophenyleneethynylene (OPE)-BODIPY Systems in Water: Guest Size-Dependent Encapsulation Mechanism and Co-aggregate Morphology. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 10669–10678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rödle, A.; Lambov, M.; Mück-Lichtenfeld, C.; Stepanenko, V.; Fernández, G. Cooperative nanoparticle H-type self-assembly of a bolaamphiphilic BODIPY derivative in aqueous medium. Polymer 2017, 128, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fielding, L.A.; Lane, J.A.; Derry, M.J.; Mykhaylyk, O.O.; Armes, S.P. Thermo-responsive Diblock Copolymer Worm Gels in Non-polar Solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5790–5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mousseau, J.J.; Xing, L.; Tang, N.; Cuccia, L.A. Design and synthesis of urea-linked aromatic oligomers—A route towards convoluted foldamers. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 10030–10038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aroua, S.; Gabrielle, E.; Tiu, V.; Ishikawa, T.; Yamakoshi, Y. Well-Defined Amphiphilic C60-PEG Conjugates: Water-Soluble and Thermoresponsive Materials. Helv. Chim. Acta 2016, 99, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Matsuura, H.; Miyazawa, T. Vibrational Analysis of Molten Poly(ethylene glycol). J. Polym. Sci. 1969, 7, 1735–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, H.; Guo, S.; Fan, W. Zhao, Y. Ultrasensitive pH-Induced Water Solubility Switch Using UCST Polymers. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 1424–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Q.; Weber, C.; Schubert, U.S. Hoogenboom, R. Thermoresponsive Polymers with Llower Critical Solution Temperature: From Fundamental Aspects and Measuring Techniques to Recommended Turbidimetry Conditions. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mihajlovic, M.; Wyss, H.M.; Sijbesma, R.P. Effects of Surfactant and Urea on Dynamics and Viscoelastic Properties of Hydrophobically Assembled Supramolecular Hydrogel. Macromolecules 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Besson, E.; Mehdi, A.; Reyé, C.; Gaveau, P.; Corriu, R.J.P. Self-assembly of layered organosilicas based on weak intermolecular interactions. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 7534–7539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Morishita, K.; Okamoto, Y.; Murayama, S.; Usui, K.; Aoki, I.; Hirai, G.; Karasawa, S. Water-Proton Relaxivities of Radical Nanoparticles Self-Assembled via Hydration or Dehydration Processes. Langmuir 2017, 33, 7810–7817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Synthetic route to UBD-13.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route to UBD-13.
Applsci 08 01080 sch001
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectral changes with concentration of UBD-1. (a) 1H NMR spectra in the chemical shift region of 0.0–7.8 ppm; and (b) enlarged aromatic region; (c) Plots of the Hm chemical shift as a function of the concentration for UBD-13. Hm indicates the aromatic protons in the meta position (Scheme 1).
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectral changes with concentration of UBD-1. (a) 1H NMR spectra in the chemical shift region of 0.0–7.8 ppm; and (b) enlarged aromatic region; (c) Plots of the Hm chemical shift as a function of the concentration for UBD-13. Hm indicates the aromatic protons in the meta position (Scheme 1).
Applsci 08 01080 g001
Figure 2. (a) Size distribution of 20 mM UBD-1 solution at 20 (blue line) and 90 °C (red line); (b) Size distribution of 10 mM UBD-1 (red lines), 10 mM UBD-2 (blue lines), and 10 mM UBD-3 (green lines) solutions, below (solid lines) and above (dotted lines) the cloud point.
Figure 2. (a) Size distribution of 20 mM UBD-1 solution at 20 (blue line) and 90 °C (red line); (b) Size distribution of 10 mM UBD-1 (red lines), 10 mM UBD-2 (blue lines), and 10 mM UBD-3 (green lines) solutions, below (solid lines) and above (dotted lines) the cloud point.
Applsci 08 01080 g002
Figure 3. TEM images of UBD-1 (a,b), -2 (c,d), and -3 (e,f). The right panels (b,d,f) show enlarged images of the red dotted squares in left panels.
Figure 3. TEM images of UBD-1 (a,b), -2 (c,d), and -3 (e,f). The right panels (b,d,f) show enlarged images of the red dotted squares in left panels.
Applsci 08 01080 g003
Figure 4. LCST behavior of (a) UBD-1 at given concentrations and (b) 10 mM solutions of UBD-13.
Figure 4. LCST behavior of (a) UBD-1 at given concentrations and (b) 10 mM solutions of UBD-13.
Applsci 08 01080 g004
Figure 5. Predicted mechanism of the self-assembly of UBD in aqueous solution.
Figure 5. Predicted mechanism of the self-assembly of UBD in aqueous solution.
Applsci 08 01080 g005
Table 1. CAC Values and Concentration Dependence of the LCST Values of UBD.
Table 1. CAC Values and Concentration Dependence of the LCST Values of UBD.
UBD-1UBD-2UBD-3
CAC
16 mM9 mM2 mM
Concentration/mMLCST
2038 °C26 °C-
1551 °C-23 °C
1071 °C29 °C-
7>80 °C-23 °C
5>80 °C57 °C-
3->80 °C27 °C
1>80 °C--

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okamoto, Y.; Morishita, K.; Fuchi, Y.; Kobayashi, S.; Karasawa, S. Effect of Hydrophobicity on the Self-Assembly Behavior of Urea Benzene Derivatives in Aqueous Solution. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071080

AMA Style

Okamoto Y, Morishita K, Fuchi Y, Kobayashi S, Karasawa S. Effect of Hydrophobicity on the Self-Assembly Behavior of Urea Benzene Derivatives in Aqueous Solution. Applied Sciences. 2018; 8(7):1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071080

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okamoto, Yuna, Kosuke Morishita, Yasufumi Fuchi, Shigeki Kobayashi, and Satoru Karasawa. 2018. "Effect of Hydrophobicity on the Self-Assembly Behavior of Urea Benzene Derivatives in Aqueous Solution" Applied Sciences 8, no. 7: 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071080

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop