Next Article in Journal
A Study on the Forming Characteristics of AZ 31B Mg Alloy in a Combined Forward–Backward Extrusion at Warm Temperatures
Next Article in Special Issue
500-kHz Level High Energy Double-Pass Nd:YVO4 Picosecond Amplifier with Optic–Optic Efficiency of 51%
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Forest Reinforcement Learning for Preventive Strategy Considering Automatic Generation Control in Large-Scale Interconnected Power Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design of Surface Plasmon Nanolaser Based on MoS2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low Threshold Plasmonic Nanolaser Based on Graphene

Optical Information Technology Lab, School of Optoelectronics and Energy, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(11), 2186; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112186
Submission received: 13 October 2018 / Revised: 2 November 2018 / Accepted: 2 November 2018 / Published: 8 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ultrafast Laser Pulses)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

The paper describes the theoretical modelling of a surface plasmon laser, based on Ag and CdS nanowires spaced with either SiO2 and graphene. A quite extensive parametric study is carried out, exploring the effects of the variation of the geometrical parameters. Results of the study are compared with the references. The most relevant result of the investigation is that the use of graphene as a space layer has apparently a very positive impact on the losses of the structure, and to lower the threshold for plasmon oscillation.

Abstract

A hybrid plasmonic nanolaser based on nanowire/air slot/semicircular graphene and metal wire structure was designed. In this structure, the waveguides in the nanowires and the graphene-metal interface are coupled to form a hybrid plasma mode, which effectively reduces the metal loss. The mode and strong coupling of the laser are analyzed by using the finite-element method. Its electric field distribution, propagation loss, normalized mode area, quality factor, and lasing threshold are studied with the different geometric model. Simulation results reveal that the performance of the laser using this structure can be optimized by adjusting the model parameters. Under the optimal parameters, the effective propagation loss is only 0.0096, and the lasing threshold can be as low as 0.14 μm−1. This structure can achieve deep sub-wavelength confinement and low-loss transmission, and provides technical support for the miniaturization and integration of nano-devices.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since the advent of the first laser in the 1960s, lasers, like other major human inventions, have had a huge impact on human production and life. In recent years, nanotechnology has developed rapidly and has had a profound impact on information and materials. Photonic devices, including lasers, have also become more miniaturized and highly integrated [1,2]. However, subject to the diffraction limit, in the traditional semiconductor laser structure, its spatial size and mode size are larger than half a wavelength, and the miniaturization of the laser is hindered, which seriously restricts its integration with nano-optical devices [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Nano-lasers based on surface plasmons (SPs [10,11,12,13,14]) are known as the world’s smallest lasers because of their spatial size and mode size that simultaneously break through the diffraction limit [15]. In 2007, Hill et al. first designed and verified metal-coated semiconductor nanolasers corresponding to wavelength electro-injection [16,17]. In 2009, Rupert F. Oulton et al. achieved surface plasmon laser lasing by experiments, which created a new method for exploring the interaction between light and matter [18,19]. Although SPs have broad application prospects in many fields, there are still many problems to be solved in practical applications.
These SPs waveguides have large loss during transmission because their structure contains a metal material having a negative dielectric constant, resulting in a relatively short transmission distance of light. How to make the waveguide structure have a lower propagation loss and have a super light-field local limiting ability is an urgent problem to be solved in the field of nanophotonics. Hybrid plasmonic waveguide (HP-waveguide) structure combines the low-loss transmission characteristics of dielectric optical waveguides with the strong optical field limitation of SPs waveguides [20,21,22,23,24,25,26], which has caused a new upsurge in the research field. In addition, with the advent of new materials, such as perovskite, graphene, and MoS2, the structural properties have been further improved. Representatively, in 2017, Haichao Yu and others of Harbin Institute of Technology used organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite as the gain medium nanowire material, which effectively reduced the cavity loss [27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, there is still a large material loss, which directly affects the further reduction of the laser threshold.
In this paper, a new material, graphene, with excellent optical properties, and a low refractive index air slot are introduced to couple the gain dielectric waveguide and the surface plasmon wave of the metal with graphene to form a new hybrid plasma waveguide structure. In the nanolaser design, the metal loss is effectively reduced, and the threshold of the laser is lower. The finite element method is used to analyze the variation of the mode characteristics, quality factor, and threshold of the laser with the geometric model, and the model of the nanolaser is optimized to make the overall performance better.

2. Theoretical Analysis

SPs is an electromagnetic energy wave formed on the metal surface when the external light field is incident on the interface of the metal medium, and the free electrons in the metal are redistributed under the action of electromagnetic waves and collective oscillation occurs. Theoretical analysis shows that the SPs wave only has the TM polarization mode on the metal-medium surface, and its dispersion relation is as follows [33]:
k sp = ω c ε m ε d ε m + ε d
In the above formula, εm and εd are the dielectric constants of the metal and the medium, respectively, and ω/c is the wave vector of the light in the air. The wave vector of the incident light field is always smaller than the propagating wave vector of SPs, which is the basic property of the SPs wave. By the phase shift method [34], the surface plasmons can be effectively excited only when the two vectors are matched.
Due to the ohmic loss in the metal, the energy in the surface wave will be attenuated as the propagation distance increases. The propagation length of the SPs wave is calculated as:
L spp = λ 0 ( ε m ) 2 2 π ε ( ε m + ε d ε m ε d ) 3 / 2
where εm’ is the real part of the dielectric constant of the metal, and εm” is the imaginary part of the dielectric constant of the metal. It can be seen from the above formula that in order to obtain a large transmission length, the real part of the dielectric constant of the metal material should be larger, and the imaginary part should be smaller. Precious metal has a low loss and a low absorption coefficient and satisfies the above conditions; therefore, precious metals are generally selected. According to the references, gold and silver are generally used [35,36], and silver is used as a metal in the design.

3. Physical Model

The structure of the hybrid plasma laser designed in this paper is shown in Figure 1. The nanolaser consists of a gain medium nanowire, left SiO2 layer, right SiO2 layer, metal nanowire, graphene nanoribbon, and air gap between the gain medium and graphene.
First, the graphene was transferred to the SiO2 layer by the computer stripping method to form a 5 nm thick graphene nanobelt, and then the Ag was evaporated under graphene to form semicircular metal nanowires. Using focused ion beam technology (FIB), an air gap with a width of wg and a thickness of ht on the surface of the SiO2 layer was etched, and ht is the distance from the bottom end of the dielectric nanowire to the top of the graphene. Finally, a CdS nanowire as a gain medium is placed along the axial direction of the air slot by a micro-nano operation. In order to enlarge the coupling area between the gain dielectric waveguide and the SP wave, the ends of the nanowire constituting the F-P cavity are circular. The length, L, of the CdS nanowire is 10 μm, the radius is fixed at 80 nm, and the radius of the semicircular Ag is 90 nm. Most related studies have analyzed the influence of the radius of the nanowire, so this article is not discussed. The width and height of the air slots in the design can vary over a certain range.
In order to reduce the absorption and heat loss of the metal, the graphene layer and the air gap are used to separate the CdS nanowires from the metal, Ag. This is because the graphene nanoribbons have good thermal conductivity as a buffer layer and can store localized electric field energy caused by dielectric waveguides and SP coupling. In addition, Ag is easily oxidized and corroded in the air. After being wrapped with graphene nanoribbons, it can protect the laser, effectively reduce the transmission loss of the laser, and improve its working stability.

4. Numerical Simulation and Analysis

The hybrid plasma laser has an output wavelength of 490 nm [37], and the dielectric constants of the CdS and SiO2 materials are 5.76 and 1.96, respectively. The dielectric constants of graphene and silver are analyzed by the Drude model, and the calculated values are 2.2 + 4.8i and −9.2 + 0.3i [38,39]. The finite element method is used to establish the mathematical model. By using the continuous boundary condition internally, using the scattering boundary condition in outer boundary, refining the mesh at the junction of the air slot and the nanowire, and improving the mesh quality, the calculation accuracy is ensured [40]. Thus, the mode characteristics and gain thresholds in the structure are calculated.

4.1. Discussion of Electric Field Distribution

The normalized electric field distribution of the two-dimensional and three-dimensional models of the laser was simulated by the finite element method. The simulation results are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. It can be seen from Figure 2a that the field enhancement effect at the air groove between the nanowire and the graphene is remarkable, and the high localization of the energy constraint is achieved. This is because the continuous movement of electrons on the surface of the metal film causes a strong light field to be generated there, and at the air gap between the metal Ag and the nanowire, the semiconductor nanowire waveguide mode is coupled with the surface plasmon mode of the metal interface, resulting in a localized effect of partial energy. Figure 2b is a normalized electric field distribution of the horizontal serif in Figure 2a. It can be seen from Figure 3 that under the excitation of the pump light, which is lased by a titanium sapphire laser with a center wavelength of 405 nm, a repetition rate of 10 kHz, and a pulse width of 100 fs [41], the SP wave generated on the metal surface is coupled into the CdS nanowire through the graphene and the air gap. The CdS nanowire is used as the gain medium and also the FP resonator, so the partial SP waveguide and the high gain dielectric waveguide are coupled and oscillated from both ends of the nanowire after oscillation amplification in the cavity.

4.2. Model Characteristics Analysis

In order to optimize the structure designed in this paper and apply it to the nanolaser, its mode characteristics, gain threshold, and quality factor (Q) were analyzed. The main parameters reflecting the mode characteristics are the effective refraction index (neff), the effective propagation loss (αeff), the normalized mode area (SF), and the confinement factor (Γ). Among them, the imaginary part of the effective index characterizes the propagation loss of the mode. The normalized mode area represents the constraint ability of the mode field. The calculation formula is [41,42]:
S F = A eff A 0 = ( | E | 2 d x d y ) 2 / ( | E | 4 d x d y ) λ 2 / 4
where Aeff is the effective mode area, A0 is the mode area under diffraction limit, and λ is the wavelength in vacuum. The confinement factor, Γ, is defined as the ratio of the electric field energy in the CdS nanowire to the electric field energy of the entire mode, which is used to characterize the field strength limiting ability of the gain medium nanowire. The calculation formula is:
Γ = W s W
where Ws represents the energy stored in the gain medium, and W represents the total energy of the mode field.
Figure 4a–d show the variation of the mode characteristics of the nanolaser with the air gap width, wg, and the distance, ht, from the bottom of the nanowire to the top of the graphene. As can be seen from Figure 4a,b, when the width of the air gap increases, the effective refraction index decreases gradually; the propagation loss of the mode decreases first and then increases. At wg = 35 nm, the minimum value is 0.0096, and the overall average value is 0.013. This is because when the width of the air slot is small, although the distance from the bottom of the nanowire to the top of the graphene remains unchanged, the overall relative height of the two is large, and the SP mode is mainly concentrated on the metal surface, causing a large loss. As the width of the air gap increases, the relative height decreases, and the SP mode coupling effect of the gain dielectric waveguide is enhanced, and the loss is gradually reduced. When the air gap reaches an optimum value, the coupling effect is no longer significant, and the continued expansion of the air gap causes an increase in loss. As can be seen from Figure 4c,d, the increase in the air gap causes the normalized mode area to gradually decrease and the confinement factor to gradually increase. It can be seen that the normalized mode area is much smaller than 0.1, the minimum value is 0.0032, and the average value is 0.018, which indicates that the hybrid plasma laser structure has a strong ability to constrain the light field and can achieve a deep sub-wavelength constraint; the confinement factor is greater than 0.55, indicating that the mode field energy is mainly located in the gain medium nanowire, and the hybrid plasma waveguide propagates in the nanowire.
At the same time, it can be seen that the refraction effective index and the confinement factor gradually decrease, as the distance, ht, from the bottom end of the nanowire to the top of the graphene increases, while the propagation loss and the normalized mode area increase.

4.3. Analysis of Q-Value and Gain Threshold

The quality factor, Q, is an important parameter for evaluating the performance of the cavity, reflecting the ability of the cavity to bind to the photon. The larger the Q value is, the longer it stores photons, and its expression is [43]:
Q = 2 π f τ R = 2 π f L δ c
where f is the frequency of the optical field in the cavity, τR is the time constant of the cavity, δ is the loss in the cavity, L is the length of the cavity, and c is the speed of light in the vacuum.
The threshold (gth) is the minimum gain required to satisfy the laser’s realization of stimulated radiation and is an important basis for reflecting the performance of the laser. The lower the threshold is, the less gain the laser needs to achieve lasing, and the higher the quality of its work is. The gth expression is:
g th = [ k 0 α eff + ln ( 1 / R ) / L ] / Γ ( n eff / n wire )
where k0 = 2π/λ is the wave number in vacuum, nwire is the refractive index of the CdS nanowire, neff is the real part of the effective index of the mode, Γ is the confinement factor, and the scaling factor, neff/nwire, is the enhancement part of the effective index of the mode. R is the end face reflectivity, defined as [44,45]:
R = ( n eff 1 ) / ( n eff + 1 )
As can be seen from Figure 5a, the gain threshold, gth, decreases first and then increases with the expansion of the air gap width. gth gradually increases with the increase of ht when wg is constant. At wg = 35 nm, ht = At 5 nm, a minimum value of 0.14 μm−1 is obtained because the escalation in the depth of the air gap increases the loss of plasmon on the metal surface, which requires more optical gain, so the threshold is increased.
Figure 5b shows that as the width of the air gap, wg, increases, when the distance, ht, from the bottom of the fixed nanowire to the top of the graphene is constant, the quality factor, Q, decreases gradually. When the wg is constant, the quality factor decreases as the ht increases. In the selected range of values, the maximum value is 150.9, indicating that the resonant cavity has a stronger ability to limit photons.
In summary, in order to optimize the performance of the nanolaser, the influence of geometric parameters on its mode characteristics, quality factor, and gain threshold are considered as a whole. Finally, the air gap width, wg, is chosen to be 35 nm, and the distance, ht, from the bottom of the nanowire to the top of the graphene is 10 nm. At this time, the laser has a propagation loss of 0.0096, an effective mode area of 0.001λ2, a threshold as low as 0.14 μm1, and a quality factor of 147.21, so that a low loss, low threshold, and deep subwavelength-constrained lasing can be achieved.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a hybrid plasma nanolaser structure based on gain medium nanowires, air slot, semicircular graphene, and metal wires was proposed. Based on the finite element method, the simulation design was carried out. The effects of the air slot width and air gap depth on the mode characteristics, gain threshold, and quality factor were studied. The simulation results show that when the width of the air slot is 35 nm and the distance from the bottom of the nanowire to the top of graphene is 5 nm, the laser has the best performance. The propagation loss is 0.0096, the normalized mode area is 0.004, the threshold value is 0.14 μm−1, the quality factor is 147.21, and the limiting factor is above 0.5. The low threshold indicates that the laser needs less gain to achieve lasing, and has a higher work quality. The nanolaser designed in this paper has a smaller size, better comprehensive performance, and can achieve ultra-deep sub-wavelength constraints and low loss transmission. It provides theoretical and technical support for the optimal design of plasma nanolaser, and has broad application prospects in biology, medicine, and other fields.

Author Contributions

L.X. and Y.L. helped proceeding the simulation processes and data analysis; F.L. organized the paper and encouraged in paper writing; Also, F.Y. and S.L. helped proceeding the simulation processes.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11204222), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (Grant No. 2013CFB316, Grant No. 2014CFB793), the Innovation Fund of School of Science, Wuhan Institute of Technology (No. CX2016106).

Acknowledgments

L.X. would like to thank the support of the Optical Information Technology Lab, Wuhan Institute of Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Solowan, H.-P.; Kryschi, C. Facile Design of a Plasmonic Nanolaser. Condens. Matter 2017, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bergman, D.J.; Stockman, M.I. Surface Plasmon Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation: Quantum Generation of Coherent Surface Plasmons in Nanosystems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 027402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stockman, M.I. Spaser Action, Loss Compensation, and Stability in Plasmonic Systems with Gain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 156802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Noginov, M.A.; Zhu, G.; Belgrave, A.M.; Bakker, R.; Shalaev, V.M.; Narimanov, E.E.; Stout, S.; Herz, E.; Suteewong, T.; Wiesner, U. Demonstration of a Spaser-Based Nanolaser. Nature 2009, 460, 1110–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gu, P.; Birch, D.J.S.; Chen, Y. Dye-Doped Polystyrene-Coated Gold Nanorods: Towards Wavelength Tuneable SPASER. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2014, 2, 024004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Eustis, S.; El-Sayed, M.A. Why Gold Nanoparticles are More Precious than Pretty Gold: Noble Metal Surface Plasmon Resonance and its Enhancement of the Radiative and Nonradiative Properties of Nanocrystals of Different Shapes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 3216–3222. [Google Scholar]
  7. Giannini, V.; Fernandez-Domínguez, A.I. Plasmonic Nanoantennas: Fundamentals and Their Use in Controlling the Radiative Properties of Nanoemitters. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3888–3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Meng, X.; Kildishev, A.V.; Fujita, K.; Tanaka, K.; Shalaev, V.M. Wavelength-Tunable Spasing in the Visible. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4106–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gordon, J.A.; Ziolkowski, R.W. The Design and Simulated Performance of a Coated Nanoparticle Laser. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 2622–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bianconi, A.; Marcelli, A. (Eds.) Atomically Controlled Surfaces, Interfaces and Nanostructures; Superstripes Press: Rome, Italy, 2016; ISBN 9788866830597. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ye, X.; Jin, L.; Caglayan, H.; Chen, J.; Xing, G.; Zheng, C.; Doan-Nguyen, V.; Kang, Y.; Engheta, N.; Kagan, C.R.; et al. Improved Size-Tunable Synthesis of Monodisperse Gold Nanorods through the Use of Aromatic Additives. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2804–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Howe, L.; Zhang, J.Z. Ultrafast Studies of Excited-State Dynamics of Phthalocyanine and Zinc Phthalocyanine Tetrasulfonate in Solution. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 3207–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kong, W.; Wan, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Bian, Y. High-sensitivity sensing based on intensity-interrogated bloch surface wave sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 193, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Descrovi, E.; Frascella, F.; Sciacca, B.; Geobaldo, F.; Dominici, L.; Michelotti, F. Coupling of surface waves in highly defined one-dimensional porous silicon photonic crystals for gas sensing applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kong, W.; Wan, Y.; Ni, X.; Zhao, W.; Li, S.; Zheng, Z. Optimizing loss of the dielectric stack for Bloch-surface-wave sensors under different interrogation schemes. J. Mod. Opt. 2017, 64, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wan, Y.H.; Zheng, Z.; Kong, W.J.; Zhao, X.; Liu, J.S. Fiber-to-fiber optical switching based on gigantic bloch-surface-wave-induced goos–hanchen shifts. IEEE Photonics J. 2013, 5, 7200107. [Google Scholar]
  17. Olivieri, A.; Lisickaskrzek, E.; Northfield, H.; Liscidini, M.; Menotti, M.; Tait, N.; Fong, N.; Berini, P. Bloch long-range surface plasmon polaritons in metallic stripe waveguides. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 593–599. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fornasari, L.; Floris, F.; Patrini, M.; Canazza, G.; Guizzetti, G.; Comoretto, D. Fluorescence excitation enhancement by bloch surface wave in all-polymer one-dimensional photonic structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 053303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Toma, K.; Descrovi, E.; Toma, M.; Ballarini, M.; Mandracci, P.; Giorgis, F. Bloch surface wave-enhanced fluorescence biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 43, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ballarini, M.; Frascella, F.; Michelotti, F.; Digregorio, G.; Rivolo, P.; Paeder, V.; Musi, V.; Giorgis, F.; Descrovi, E. Bloch surface waves-controlled emission of organic dyes grafted on a one-dimensional photonic crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fornasari, L.; Floris, F.; Patrini, M.; Comoretto, D.; Marabelli, F. Demonstration of fluorescence enhancement via bloch surface waves in all-polymer multilayer structures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 14086–14093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wan, Y.H.; Zheng, Z.; Shi, X.G.; Bian, Y.S.; Liu, J.S. Hybrid plasmon waveguide leveraging Bloch surface polaritons for sub-wavelength confinement. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2013, 56, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bartal, G.; Oulton, R.F.; Sorger, V.J.; Zhang, X. A Hybrid Plasmonic Waveguide for Subwavelength Confinement and Long Range Propagation. Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 496. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ibarlucea, B.; Römhildt, L.; Zörgiebel, F.; Pregl, S.; Vahdatzadeh, M.; Weber, W.M.; Mikolajick, T.; Opitz, J.; Baraban, L.; Cuniberti, G. Gating Hysteresis as an Indicator for Silicon Nanowire FET Biosensors. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, D.; Wang, R.; Kuai, Y.; Lu, F.; Tang, X.; Wang, P.; Ming, H.; Rosenfeld, M.; et al. Manipulating Propagation Constants of Silver Nanowire Plasmonic Waveguide Modes Using a Dielectric Multilayer Substrate. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, H.; Li, Z.P.; Tian, X.R.; Wang, Z.X.; Cong, F.Z.; Liu, N.; Zhang, S.P.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N.J.; Xu, H.X. Quantum Dot-Based Local Field Imaging Reveals Plasmon-Based Interferometric Logic in Silver Nanowire Networks. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yu, H.; Ren, K.; Wu, Q.; Wang, J.; Lin, J.; Wang, Z.; Xu, J.; Oulton, R.F.; Jin, P. Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Plasmonic Nanowire Lasers with a Low Threshold and a Good Thermal Stability. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 19536–19540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shegai, T.; Miljkovic, V.D.; Bao, K.; Xu, H.X.; Nordlander, P.; Johansson, P.; Kall, M. Unidirectional Broadband Light Emission from Supported Plasmonic Nanowires. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 706–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pyayt, A.L.; Wiley, B.; Xia, Y.N.; Chen, A.T.; Dalton, L. Integration of Photonic and Silver Nanowire Plasmonic Waveguides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wei, H.; Zhang, S.P.; Tian, X.R.; Xu, H.X. Highly Tunable Propagating Surface Plasmons on Supported Silver Nanowires. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 4494–4499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Song, M.; Bouhelier, A.; Bramant, P.; Sharma, J.; Dujardin, E.; Zhang, D.; Colas-des-Francs, G. Imaging Symmetry-Selected Corner Plasmon Modes in Penta-Twinned Crystalline Ag Nanowires. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5874–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Drezet, A.; Hohenau, A.; Koller, D.; Stepanov, A.; Ditlbacher, H.; Steinberger, B.; Aussenegg, F.R.; Leitner, A.; Krenn, J.R. Leakage Radiation Microscopy of Surface Plasmon Polaritons. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2008, 149, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Raether, H. Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; pp. 6–8. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Z.X.; Wei, H.; Pan, D.; Xu, H.X. Controlling the Radiation Direction of Propagating Surface Plasmons on Silver Nanowires. Laser Photonics Rev. 2014, 8, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jia, Z.L.; Wei, H.; Pan, D.; Xu, H.X. Direction-Resolved Radiation from Polarization-Controlled Surface Plasmon Modes on Silver Nanowire Antennas. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 20118–20124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, D.G.; Xiang, Y.F.; Chen, J.X.; Cheng, J.J.; Zhu, L.F.; Wang, R.X.; Zou, G.; Wang, P.; Ming, H.; Rosenfeld, M.; et al. Extending the Propagation Distance of a Silver Nanowire Plasmonic Waveguide with a Dielectric Multilayer Substrate. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zhan, Q.W. Cylindrical Vector Beams: From Mathematical Concepts to Applications. Adv. Opt. Photonics 2009, 1, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lv, H.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Z. Hybrid plasmonic waveguides for low-threshold nanolaser applications. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2014, 12, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhou, L. Study on Photoelectric Characteristics of Typical Graphene Structure Based on FDFD Method; Anhui University Press: Hefei, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, S.P.; Xu, H.X. Optimizing Substrate-Mediated Plasmon Coupling toward High-Performance Plasmonic Nanowire Waveguides. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8128–8135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yu, H. Research on Low Los Semiconductor Nanolasers Based on Surface Plasmons; Harbin Institute of Technology Press: Harbin, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  42. Palik, E.D.; Ghosh, G. Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  43. Joannopoulos, J.D.; Johnson, S.G.; Winn, J.N.; Meade, R.D. Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gerard, D.; Wenger, J.; Devilez, A.; Gachet, D.; Stout, B.; Bonod, N.; Popov, E.; Rigneault, H. Strong Electromagnetic Confinement near Dielectric Microspheres to Enhance Single-Molecule Fluorescence. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 15297–15303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xu, L.; Fang, L.; Lai, W.; Zhou, J.; Shuai, L. Design of Surface Plasmon Nanolaser Based on MoS2. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The block diagrams of the nanolaser. (b) The section plan of the nanolaser.
Figure 1. (a) The block diagrams of the nanolaser. (b) The section plan of the nanolaser.
Applsci 08 02186 g001
Figure 2. (a) 2D electric field distribution of the nanolaser. (b) Horizontal serif electric field distribution.
Figure 2. (a) 2D electric field distribution of the nanolaser. (b) Horizontal serif electric field distribution.
Applsci 08 02186 g002
Figure 3. (a) Three-dimensional mode of the nanolaser and the (b) y-z normalized electric field.
Figure 3. (a) Three-dimensional mode of the nanolaser and the (b) y-z normalized electric field.
Applsci 08 02186 g003
Figure 4. The mode properties change with the air gap, wg, and the distance, ht; (a) effective index, neff; (b) effective propagation loss, αeff; (c) normalized mode area, SF; (d) confinement factor, Γ.
Figure 4. The mode properties change with the air gap, wg, and the distance, ht; (a) effective index, neff; (b) effective propagation loss, αeff; (c) normalized mode area, SF; (d) confinement factor, Γ.
Applsci 08 02186 g004
Figure 5. The change of gain threshold and quality factor with the structures (a); threshold, gth; and (b) quality factor, Q.
Figure 5. The change of gain threshold and quality factor with the structures (a); threshold, gth; and (b) quality factor, Q.
Applsci 08 02186 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Li, F.; Liu, S.; Yao, F.; Liu, Y. Low Threshold Plasmonic Nanolaser Based on Graphene. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112186

AMA Style

Xu L, Li F, Liu S, Yao F, Liu Y. Low Threshold Plasmonic Nanolaser Based on Graphene. Applied Sciences. 2018; 8(11):2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112186

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Litu, Fang Li, Shuai Liu, Fuqiang Yao, and Yahui Liu. 2018. "Low Threshold Plasmonic Nanolaser Based on Graphene" Applied Sciences 8, no. 11: 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112186

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop