Next Article in Journal
Structure-Aware Feature Descriptor with Multi-Scale Side Window Filtering for Multi-Modal Image Matching
Previous Article in Journal
Towards Software Architecture as an Auditable Practice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Stratum Disturbance During the Construction of Dual-Line Shield Tunnels with Consideration of Soil Spatial Variability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evolution Mechanism and Cyclic Degradation Model of Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Suction Caissons Under Inclined Combined Loading

1
School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2
Major Scientific and Technological R & D Projects of CCCC, Beijing 100010, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 3017; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16063017
Submission received: 15 February 2026 / Revised: 15 March 2026 / Accepted: 18 March 2026 / Published: 20 March 2026

Abstract

In the marine environment, the suction caisson foundation (SCF) is often subjected to combined inclined and cyclic loading from wind and waves, which may significantly affect its ultimate bearing capacity. Under combined loading conditions, the evolution of ultimate bearing capacity is influenced by multiple factors, and the corresponding bearing capacity envelopes have become key issues that urgently need to be addressed. In this study, a series of model tests and numerical simulations were conducted considering the effects of load inclination angle, loading position, aspect ratio, soil undrained shear strength, and interface friction coefficient. The results show that under static loading conditions, as the loading depth increases, the load inclination angle corresponding to the maximum bearing capacity decreases from 45° to 0°. As the cyclic load ratio and static load ratio increase, cyclic loading significantly intensifies displacement accumulation and the degradation of ultimate bearing capacity. As the loading depth increases, the failure mechanism transitions from rotation-dominated to translation-dominated behavior. In addition, the ultimate bearing capacity increases monotonically with increasing aspect ratio, interface friction coefficient, and soil undrained shear strength. A normalized V–H bearing capacity envelope was established, which shows good agreement with the experimental and numerical results. By introducing a cyclic bearing capacity degradation coefficient, a modified envelope was proposed to describe the evolution of ultimate bearing capacity under cyclic loading conditions. The bearing capacity evolution patterns and envelope method proposed in this study provide a useful reference for the engineering design of SCF.
Keywords: suction caisson foundation; bearing characteristics; combined loading; envelope method suction caisson foundation; bearing characteristics; combined loading; envelope method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, K.; Yu, B.; Liu, B.; Huang, L.; Deng, H.; Zhu, W.; Dai, G. Evolution Mechanism and Cyclic Degradation Model of Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Suction Caissons Under Inclined Combined Loading. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16063017

AMA Style

Huang K, Yu B, Liu B, Huang L, Deng H, Zhu W, Dai G. Evolution Mechanism and Cyclic Degradation Model of Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Suction Caissons Under Inclined Combined Loading. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(6):3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16063017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Kang, Bingzhen Yu, Bo Liu, Liji Huang, Huiyuan Deng, Wenbo Zhu, and Guoliang Dai. 2026. "Evolution Mechanism and Cyclic Degradation Model of Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Suction Caissons Under Inclined Combined Loading" Applied Sciences 16, no. 6: 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16063017

APA Style

Huang, K., Yu, B., Liu, B., Huang, L., Deng, H., Zhu, W., & Dai, G. (2026). Evolution Mechanism and Cyclic Degradation Model of Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Suction Caissons Under Inclined Combined Loading. Applied Sciences, 16(6), 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16063017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop