Next Article in Journal
Multi-Scale Characterization of Asphalt Aggregates: Linking Lithological Origin, Engineering Performance, and Stripping Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Visual Simulation Proportion Optimization and Mechanical Properties of Slate Strata in Changsha
Previous Article in Special Issue
Construction and Practice of a Blended Smart Course for Environmental Microbiology Under OBE Principles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

AI-Related Competence, Innovation, Perceived Threats, Ethics, and Job Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers

by
Pablo Cavero-López
and
Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez
*
Department of Didactics and Educational Organisation, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013-Seville, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(17), 8636; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178636 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 June 2026 / Revised: 22 August 2026 / Accepted: 28 August 2026 / Published: 30 August 2026

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a key driver of transformation in educational contexts, influencing both teaching and learning processes as well as the digital competencies required by teachers and students. In this context, understanding how AI is perceived, used, and valued is essential for guiding educational innovation in a critical and sustainable way. This study examines digital competence in artificial intelligence and its relationship with educational innovation, perceived threats, and job satisfaction, comparing university students and in-service teachers. The research adopts a quantitative approach based on a questionnaire administered to 355 participants. The results indicate that students demonstrate higher levels of technical skills, innovative vision, and more positive attitudes toward the educational use of AI, whereas teachers adopt a more cautious stance, mainly due to a lack of specific training and the absence of clear institutional guidelines. Significant differences are also found regarding perceived threats, with students showing greater awareness of risks such as plagiarism, algorithmic bias, and the potential erosion of critical thinking. In contrast, no significant differences are identified in ethics or job satisfaction. In conclusion, the study reveals a competence gap between both groups and highlights the need to redesign initial teacher education and promote continuous professional development in AI. Finally, it emphasizes the importance of integrating artificial intelligence into education from a critical, ethical, and human-centered perspective.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; AI literacy; AI readiness; digital competence; teacher education; job satisfaction artificial intelligence; AI literacy; AI readiness; digital competence; teacher education; job satisfaction

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cavero-López, P.; Palacios-Rodríguez, A. AI-Related Competence, Innovation, Perceived Threats, Ethics, and Job Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 8636. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178636

AMA Style

Cavero-López P, Palacios-Rodríguez A. AI-Related Competence, Innovation, Perceived Threats, Ethics, and Job Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(17):8636. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178636

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cavero-López, Pablo, and Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez. 2026. "AI-Related Competence, Innovation, Perceived Threats, Ethics, and Job Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers" Applied Sciences 16, no. 17: 8636. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178636

APA Style

Cavero-López, P., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2026). AI-Related Competence, Innovation, Perceived Threats, Ethics, and Job Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers. Applied Sciences, 16(17), 8636. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178636

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop