Next Article in Journal
A Novel Distributed Dynamic Loads Identification Method of the Thin Plate Structures Based on Bayesian Theory Under Unknown Initial Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Valorization of Tomato Processing Industry Waste: Enhancing Oxidative Stability of Common Vegetable Seed Oils
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanism of Fracture Network Propagation and Permeability Evolution in Naturally Fractured Rock Under Pulse Fracturing

1
School of Low-Carbon Energy and Power Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Fire Exploration and Intelligent Development of Coal Resources, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(17), 8363; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178363 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 21 July 2026 / Revised: 16 August 2026 / Accepted: 21 August 2026 / Published: 22 August 2026

Abstract

Natural fractures dominate fracturing effects and well production. Conventional fracturing fails to fully activate multi-scale fractures, and most simulations adopt homogeneous rock assumptions, lacking systematic analysis on fracture propagation and seepage evolution in heterogeneous fractured formations, while the natural fracture activation mechanism of pulsed fracturing remains unclear. This work constructs a pulsed fracturing model for heterogeneous fractured rock to simulate fracture growth and permeability evolution in intact rock and formations with various fracture attitudes, revealing the coupled laws of fracture propagation and seepage change. Results show rock mechanical heterogeneity determines fracture network complexity in intact rock; pulsed loading slows main fracture breakthrough and stimulates microcracks, creating a near-well dense and far-well sparse fracture distribution. Single-orientation fractures drive directional asymmetric fracture extension following near-weak-zone priority, with matrix heterogeneity merely causing local fracture deflection. Multi-orientation fractures display layered activation: low-angle and near-well fractures initiate first, and cross-fracture interactions raise network complexity and coverage. Fracture growth is jointly governed by weak bedding, pulse fatigue damage and matrix properties. Pulsed fracturing achieves remote non-contact activation of natural fractures, with fracture-permeability evolution showing strong spatiotemporal coupling; main fracture breakthrough triggers abrupt permeability growth. Serving as both mechanical weak planes and preferential flow paths, natural fractures build composite seepage systems of main channels and micro flow zones. This study provides theoretical support for parameter optimization and efficient permeability improvement in fractured reservoirs.

1. Introduction

The global energy structure is undergoing profound transformation alongside steady implementation of China’s dual-carbon strategy. As clean low-carbon fossil resources, unconventional hydrocarbons including shale, tight sandstone and coal rock are critical for stabilizing domestic energy supply and bridging new energy accommodation gaps [1,2]. China has abundant low-permeability tight reservoirs, where natural fractures with varied dips and spatial distributions are widely developed. These primary weak interfaces directly modify internal stress transfer paths, fracture initiation thresholds and fluid migration channels, and act as core geological factors governing stimulated reservoir volume, seepage enhancement and ultimate single-well recovery [3,4,5]. Large-scale hydraulic fracturing is now widely used for domestic tight reservoir development, yet prominent engineering challenges persist: artificial fractures rarely fully connect with natural fractures, rock fatigue damage covers limited ranges, and reservoir permeability improvement is uneven and insufficient. These drawbacks severely constrain overall tight reservoir production efficiency. As carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) technology integrates with reservoir stimulation, novel fracturing technologies with low formation damage and large-scale permeability enhancement are urgently needed. Systematic studies on pulsed fracturing mechanisms and seepage evolution in fractured rock masses carry great engineering significance [6,7,8].
Tight rock matrices are dense with extremely low primary pore connectivity, and most natural fractures stay closed under long-term in situ stress compaction. Lacking inherent seepage channels, formations barely achieve industrial production with natural productivity, so artificial fracturing loads are needed to induce damage, open fractures and build well-connected networks for fundamental permeability improvement [9,10]. Years of technical iteration have yielded multiple mainstream fracturing technologies, all with notable limitations in fractured rock masses. Conventional constant-pressure hydraulic fracturing features mature techniques and controllable costs, but steady loading fails to continuously accumulate fatigue damage or batch-activate scattered natural fractures. It usually forms only single primary fractures with limited secondary damage, leading to poor artificial–natural fracture connectivity and restricted permeability enhancement [11,12,13]. Ultra-deep hole blasting fracturing has high instantaneous fracturing efficiency, but its energy concentrates in a small effective radius, creating crushed zones only near wellbores and barely activating distant natural fractures [14,15]. Supercritical CO2 fracturing avoids water-sensitive damage and enables carbon sequestration, but produces narrow fracture apertures and weak fracture surface activation, leading to insufficient permeability growth. Nitrogen fracturing applies to water-scarce, water-sensitive formations and avoids water block damage, but its pressure energy attenuates rapidly, improving seepage only in narrow near-wellbore zones and barely activating deep natural fractures [16,17,18]. Overall, traditional constant-pressure loading cannot synchronously activate multi-scale natural fractures, resulting in insufficient damage and poorly connected seepage networks that fail to meet refined permeability improvement requirements for fractured tight rocks. Pulsed fracturing thus becomes a preferred solution to break these bottlenecks.
Pulsed fracturing, originating in the mid-late 20th century, has evolved through decades of theoretical research, laboratory testing and field application into a mature research framework. Early scholars established alternating-load rock-breaking models based on fatigue and fracture mechanics, clarifying microcrack initiation and propagation laws under repeated cyclic pressure [19]. In the 1990s, research focused on single-factor optimization of key parameters such as pulse amplitude and loading frequency, with laboratory core tests preliminarily quantifying their effects on rock-fracturing performance [20]. Since 2010, integrated methods combining numerical simulation, true triaxial physical experiments and acoustic emission monitoring have been widely adopted, enabling accurate quantitative analysis of how in situ stress, rock homogeneity and fracture density govern fracturing results [21,22]. Over the past decade, pulsed fracturing field pilots have been conducted in multiple blocks, with supporting equipment and techniques such as downhole pulse generators and staged pulse injection continuously optimized [23]. Unlike conventional constant-pressure fracturing, pulsed fracturing uses periodic alternating loads to superimpose cyclic stress within rock masses, efficiently accumulating fatigue damage and substantially reducing rock fracture initiation pressure [24]. Alternating stress waves penetrate tight matrices to reach natural fracture interfaces, weakening fracture surface cementation and guiding artificial fractures to deflect, branch and interconnect along natural fracture strikes. This technology overcomes single primary fracture limitations, simultaneously activating multi-directional natural fractures to form interconnected multi-branch damage networks, and exhibits strong adaptability for permeability enhancement in heterogeneous, naturally fractured rock masses [25,26,27].
Numerical simulation is a core tool for quantitatively characterizing full-process damage accumulation and dynamic permeability feedback during pulsed fracturing. Classical analytical models including KGD and PKN laid the mechanical foundation for hydraulic fracturing in the mid-20th century, establishing the viscosity–toughness dual control theory of fracture propagation. However, early two-dimensional models only solved independent stress fields, entirely neglecting rock damage evolution and dynamic permeability changes in pores and fractures, leading to notable deviations from actual fractured-formation conditions [28]. The 1990s saw algorithm advances: quasi-3D models, extended finite element methods and discrete element methods were developed sequentially, enabling simulation of simple artificial fracture geometries. Most remain limited to single-physics calculations and cannot characterize two-way coupling between damage generation and seepage evolution with natural fractures [29,30]. Since the 21st century, damage–seepage dual-field coupling models have developed rapidly with greatly improved accuracy. With widespread high-performance parallel computing, multi-field coupling algorithms such as FV-FE, IGA and THMD have been continuously optimized to solve deformation, temperature, seepage and damage variables synchronously [31,32,33]. Nevertheless, most existing multi-field models incorporate numerous physical processes such as heat conduction and elastic deformation, imposing extremely heavy computational loads. Most current studies focus on homogeneous intact rock without bedding or natural fractures, and simplified simulation systems retaining only damage–permeability two-way coupling for fractured rock masses remain scarce. Numerical models that exclude secondary physical fields (e.g., temperature, matrix deformation) and focus on damage–seepage dynamic interaction can drastically reduce computation time. Such models efficiently compare permeability enhancement across different fracture combinations and support mechanistic studies of pulsed fracturing in fractured rock masses.
Abundant simulation and experimental results on pulsed fracturing have been accumulated, but notable gaps remain in current research. Most existing simulations focus on intact homogeneous rock, lacking systematic comparisons across parallel, inclined, orthogonal and mixed fracture scenarios. Most coupling models emphasize thermal-stress synergistic effects but neglect the core reciprocal feedback between damage evolution and abrupt permeability surges, failing to quantitatively characterize the stepped seepage capacity growth mechanism driven by sequential activation of variably oriented fractures. This work simplifies secondary physical fields (heat exchange, elastic deformation) and constructs a numerical model dedicated to dynamic damage–permeability coupling. Rock matrix mechanical heterogeneity is represented via the Weibull distribution, with five representative conditions designed for numerical tests. Systematic simulations reproduce the full process of damage accumulation, fracture propagation and permeability change under pulsed loading, and elaborate how natural fracture attitudes and spatial configurations modulate fracture network geometry, damage distribution and seepage enhancement performance. The hierarchical activation sequence of multi-attitude natural fractures and non-contact remote activation effects under cyclic pulsed loading are further clarified, and the strong spatiotemporal coupling law between fracture expansion and permeability mutation is summarized. This study provides theoretical support and engineering reference for productivity improvement and efficient development of unconventional reservoirs.

2. Theory of Pulse Fracture Network Propagation for Naturally Fractured Rock

The numerical model in this work is constructed based on multiple simplified assumptions. Plane strain conditions are adopted to eliminate three-dimensional geological effects. Isothermal calculations are performed with minor thermal coupling effects neglected. Incompressible Newtonian fluid and Darcy’s seepage law are applied to characterize pore fluid migration. Mechanical parameters of rock masses follow the Weibull distribution to reflect matrix heterogeneity.

2.1. Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Model for Naturally Fractured Rock

Linear elastic static equilibrium equations accounting for pore pressure and temperature variations in fractured rock [23,34,35]:
G u i , i j + G 1 2 ν u j , i j α p i K α T T i + F i = 0
where G is the shear modulus of fractured rock (Pa), E is the elastic modulus (Pa), and ν is Poisson’s ratio. F and u are the body force and velocity respectively. K is the bulk modulus (Pa), T is the reservoir temperature (K), α is the Biot coefficient, and α T is the thermal expansion coefficient of fractured rock (K −1).
The governing equation of the temperature field considering thermal convection and reservoir stress [36,37] is as follows:
ρ l C l ϕ + ρ s C s 1 ϕ T t + T + T 0 K α T ε T t + ρ l C l T + T 0 k μ p = ϕ λ l + 1 ϕ λ s 2 T
where λ l and λ s are the thermal conductivities of the fluid and rock matrix (W/(m·K)). C l and C s are the specific heat capacities of the fluid and rock matrix respectively. T0 is the initial temperature (K).
The governing equation of the seepage considering reservoir stress and temperature of fractured rock [38,39] is as follows:
ϕ K l + 1 ϕ K s p t + K K s 1 ε v t + α T K K s ϕ α l 1 ϕ α s T t = k μ p + ρ l g z
where α l and α s are the volumetric expansion coefficients of the fluid and solid (K −1). ε v is the volumetric strain. ϕ represents the porosity. K l and K s denote the effective bulk moduli of the fluid and solid (Pa). g is the gravitational acceleration (m/s2). z refers to the position head (m). k stands for the permeability of the continuous medium (m2). ρ l is the fluid density (kg/m3). μ represents the fluid viscosity (Pa·s).

2.2. Damage Criterion for Naturally Fractured Rock

Cracks propagate and extend once damage emerges in fractured rock. The maximum tensile stress criterion and Mohr–Coulomb criterion are adopted separately to judge the tensile failure and shear failure of rock. The expression of the maximum tensile stress criterion is written as [34]:
F 1 = f t + σ 1 = 0
where F1 refers to the threshold function of the tensile damage (Pa). ft represents the tensile strength of the fractured rock (Pa). σ 1 is the minimum principal stress (Pa).
The Mohr–Coulomb criterion is expressed as [40,41]:
F 2 = f c + 1 + sin θ 1 sin θ σ 1 σ 3 = 0
where F2 denotes the threshold function of the shear damage (Pa). fc is the compressive strength of the fractured rock (Pa). θ stands for the internal friction angle. σ 3 represents the minimum principal stress (Pa).
A damage variable is introduced to characterize the damage degree of fractured rock during the evolution of induced fractures, which can be expressed as [42,43]:
D = 0 F 1 < 0 , F 2 < 0 1 ε t / ε 1 2 F 1 = 0 , d F 1 > 0 1 ε c / ε 3 2 F 2 = 0 , d F 2 > 0
where ε t and ε c are the tensile strain and compressive strain of the fractured rock respectively. ε 1 and ε 3 represent the maximum principal strain and the minimum principal strain of the fractured rock. D is the damage variable of the fractured rock.

2.3. Damage Evolution Effect of Naturally Fractured Rock

Based on elastic damage theory, the elastic modulus of fractured rock after damage can be expressed as [43]:
E = E 0 1 D
where E0 is the initial elastic modulus of the fractured rock (Pa); E denotes the elastic modulus of the fractured rock after damage (Pa).
The relationship between the porosity ϕ and the effective stress σv of fractured rock can be expressed as [44,45]:
ϕ = ϕ 0 ϕ L e β ϕ σ v + ϕ L
where ϕ 0 is the initial porosity, ϕ L is the ultimate porosity under compressive stress, and β ϕ represents the stress sensitivity coefficient of porosity with a value of 5.0 × 10−8 Pa−1. The effective stress σv is defined as [46]:
σ v = σ ¯ α p
where the equation of the pulse pressure p varying with time is expressed as:
p = A sin 2 π f t + p 0
where A denotes the pulse amplitude (Pa), p0 stands for the static reference pressure (Pa), and f is the pulse frequency (Hz).
The influence of damage on thermal conductivity is expressed as [42,45]:
λ s T , D = λ s T e β T D
where λ s T is the initial thermal conductivity at temperature T, and βT is the damage coefficient of the thermal conductivity.
The permeability k of fractured rock after damage can be expressed as [35]:
k = k 0 ϕ ϕ 0 3 e β k D
where k0 is the initial permeability of the fractured rock (m2), and βk is the damage coefficient of the permeability. Reservoir permeability can be acquired via the k parameter.

2.4. Heterogeneity of Naturally Fractured Rock

To quantitatively characterize the mechanical heterogeneity of fractured rock reservoirs, the representative elementary volume (REV) method is widely applied in engineering and numerical simulation studies. Conventionally, REV mechanical parameters follow the Weibull distribution, while mineral compositions are described by the normal distribution. However, direct coupling of the two distributions without considering the inherent correlation between mineral composition and macroscopic mechanical parameters will cause notable deviations between the characterized heterogeneity and actual reservoir properties. Therefore, mechanical parameter heterogeneity, rather than mineral composition distribution rules, should be prioritized when establishing damage evolution models. The probability density function of the Weibull distribution is given as follows [46,47]:
W χ = b χ 0 χ χ 0 b 1 e χ χ 0 b
where W χ denotes the Weibull probability density function, χ represents the physico-mechanical parameter, χ 0 is the scale parameter correlated with the average value of the physico-mechanical parameters of all REVs, and b is the heterogeneity coefficient. A larger value of b indicates higher uniformity and weaker heterogeneity of parameters.

3. Numerical Model Establishment and Verification for Pulse Fracturing in Naturally Fractured Rock

3.1. Numerical Model Establishment

In this model, the spatially heterogeneous mechanical parameters of fractured rock are assigned via the Weibull distribution in MATLAB 2025, generating spatial fields of elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, uniaxial compressive strength and tensile strength (Figure 1). All parameters are integrated into standardized data files and imported into COMSOL 6.4 to realize parametric mapping for all mesh elements in the computational domain. The COMSOL numerical settings are supplemented. Solid mechanics and Darcy’s law are coupled and solved by transient fully coupled automatic Newton algorithm with second-order Lagrange elements. Core laws governing fracture growth are completely captured by two-dimensional geometry under plane strain assumptions. Excessive computational costs from three-dimensional meshes are eliminated without altering fundamental coupling mechanisms between seepage and rock damage. Axial multi-branched fractures are generated in pulsed fracturing tests. General fracture propagation rules under three-dimensional conditions can be analyzed via simplified two-dimensional models. Two-dimensional models are thus adopted for numerical simulation.
A thermo-hydro-mechanical-damage coupled numerical model is established in COMSOL by coupling solid mechanics, porous medium seepage, subsurface heat transfer and phase-field damage physics to analyze fracture propagation and permeability evolution in fractured rock under pulsed fracturing. Permeability presents staged mutation characteristics: independent microdamage only slightly improves seepage, while interconnected fractures formed by accumulated damage lead to sharp permeability rise. Cyclic pulse loading creates closed two-way feedback between rock damage and reservoir permeability. Tensile–shear damage expands pore-fracture channels and raises permeability; higher permeability accelerates fluid pressure propagation to trigger remote fatigue damage inside rock masses. Temperature and rock deformation exert trivial influences on this interaction, so an isothermal simplification is adopted in simulations. Although temperature terms are retained in governing equations to maintain the integrity of multi-field framework, thermal effects are not activated during calculation. For short-duration pulse fracturing, heat exchange and thermal stress in each cycle are negligible and barely affect fracture initiation and propagation, so the isothermal assumption will not reduce the reliability of analysis results. This work mainly focuses on the bidirectional coupling between damage evolution and dynamic permeability. Boundary conditions of borehole pulse pressure, in situ stress and impermeable barriers are set, together with a uniform initial pore pressure field. The model adopts sequential solving and adaptive mesh refinement: in situ stress equilibrium is solved prior to transient pulse fracturing simulation. Post-processing quantitatively extracts damage distribution, fracture morphology and permeability evolution, and the numerical framework can reproduce rock heterogeneity and natural fracture characteristics for mechanism analysis of fracture development.
The model adopts a 150 mm-side square computational domain, with a 6 mm-radius circular borehole at the center for periodic pulsating water pressure application. Roller supports are set on the left and bottom boundaries; vertical major stress σ1 is loaded on the top, and horizontal major stress σ3 on the right (Figure 2). The fitting curve of average permeability across the full computational domain under identical simulation time against mesh element counts is shown in Figure 2b. Calculated permeability values drop sharply at low mesh quantities and gradually converge to a stable range as mesh elements increase, which serves as the basis to determine the final discretization scheme. To eliminate confining pressure interference and isolate the effect of natural fracture distribution on fracture propagation, identical boundary loads are applied for all working conditions. The model is discretized into 96,000 mesh elements with 670,000 total degrees of freedom; local mesh refinement is performed in fracture propagation zones, with element size smaller than fracture thickness. The basic simulation parameters are summarized in Table 1.

3.2. Model Verification

The reliability of the established thermo-hydro-mechanical-damage coupling numerical model is verified via comparison against laboratory pulse fracturing test observations. The surface morphology of rock specimens before and after pulse fracturing loading are shown in Figure 3a,c. No visible fractures are detected around the central borehole on intact rock samples in Figure 3a prior to hydraulic loading. Multiple distinct axial tensile cracks initiate from the borehole wall and propagate outward radially after cyclic pulse hydraulic pressure is applied, as presented in Figure 3c. The fracture distribution characteristics predicted by the present numerical model are shown in Figure 3b,d. Only minor microdamage accumulates within the narrow annular zone surrounding the injection borehole at the initial calculation stage in Figure 3b, which corresponds closely to the intact rock state reflected in Figure 3a. A multi-branched radial fracture network radiating from the central borehole is fully reproduced after successive pulse pressure cycles, as illustrated in Figure 3d. The fracture initiation positions, dominant radial propagation paths and overall multi-crack morphology obtained from the numerical simulation align well with the axial crack distribution captured by laboratory test results. The consistent fracture development features between numerical predictions and experimental phenomena demonstrate the rationality of the adopted damage–permeability coupling framework, the parameter settings and the cyclic pulse loading scheme. The constructed model can reflect the fracture initiation and propagation law of rock masses under pulsed hydraulic fracturing conditions.

4. Fracture Propagation and Permeability Evolution of Intact Rock During Pulse Fracturing

The final fracture propagation pattern and permeability distribution of intact rock under pulsed hydraulic fracturing are summarized in Figure 4, while Figure 5 presents their time-dependent evolution characteristics. The entire process comprises three consecutive stages: initial fracture initiation, fracture extension, and stable propagation, with permeability evolution highly synchronized with fracture development.
In the initial fracture initiation stage, pulsed pressure on the borehole wall gradually accumulates stress in surrounding rock. An annular high-damage zone first forms around the borehole, reflecting circumferential tensile failure of the borehole wall. Driven by the spatial randomness of rock elastic modulus and tensile strength, stress concentration distributes unevenly, with failure initiating preferentially at low-strength positions and forming serrated, irregular damage zone boundaries. Damage remains confined to the near-borehole region, dominated by microscale damage initiation and accumulation, with no macroscopic fractures penetrating into the rock matrix. Correspondingly, intact rock matrix permeability stays at an extremely low level, with primary pores as the main seepage channels. The annular damage zone triggers a slight permeability rise to form a surrounding high-permeability ring, but the increment is limited and generates no effective flow conductivity. Rock heterogeneity only induces minor random matrix permeability fluctuations, leaving overall seepage capacity poor.
During the fracture extension stage, with continued pulsed pressure loading, near-borehole damage reaches a critical threshold. Local microcracks coalesce, and multiple macroscopic main fractures break through the damage zone and propagate rapidly radially toward the far-borehole region, shifting the network from a diffused microdamage pattern to a main-fracture-dominated structure. Main fractures follow preferential paths with pre-existing microdamage and lower strength; spatial heterogeneity governs their number, initiation azimuth and trajectory, producing radially distributed paths with minor deflections. Sustained high stress concentration at fracture tips drives further extension, while abundant microdamage and branch fractures remain in the near-borehole zone to form a complex near-well fracture network. In parallel, the permeability field jumps by orders of magnitude with macroscopic main fracture breakthrough, forming continuous high-permeability strips along fracture paths as primary seepage channels with permeability orders of magnitude higher than the matrix. The reservoir flow regime shifts from matrix-dominated to fracture-dominated. High-permeability zones align with main fractures in the damage field, extending toward low-strength, fully damaged areas; permeability peaks at fracture centers and drops rapidly into the surrounding matrix. Near-borehole microcrack zone permeability rises synchronously and connects with main fracture high-permeability zones, building a near-borehole high-permeability network.
In the stable propagation stage, main fracture count and overall morphology remain largely stable, with no new macroscopic fractures generated. Network evolution is dominated by radial extension of existing main fractures with gradually decreasing propagation rates. The high-damage zone at fracture tips advances continuously, while near-well damage degree and scope show no notable changes. Pulsed pressure energy is mainly released through formed main fractures; far-borehole rock heterogeneity only induces minor trajectory fluctuations without altering the overall network pattern. Correspondingly, the overall permeability field pattern stabilizes with no new high-permeability strips generated. Evolution mainly manifests as radial extension of high-permeability zones along main fractures toward far-borehole regions, with tip high-permeability areas advancing synchronously and band width and peak permeability nearly unchanged. The final fracture network features a dense near-borehole distribution and a sparse peripheral distribution, with high near-borehole complexity and trunk-fracture-dominated far-borehole zones. Consistently, the final permeability field presents channelized characteristics: several trunk high-permeability bands extend radially from the borehole to carry primary flow transport, and a large-scale high-permeability block forms in the near-borehole zone via interwoven microcracks and main fractures, while the far-borehole matrix retains its original low-permeability state.
Overall, fracture network formation and permeability evolution in intact rock under pulsed hydraulic fracturing constitute a damage-driven nonlinear process governed by rock heterogeneity, with distinct threshold effects. The random spatial distribution of rock mechanical parameters drives complex initial microcracks and localized permeability enhancement. The stress-damage positive feedback mechanism selects preferential propagation paths, forming a coupled spatial pattern: complex near-borehole fracture networks paired with high-permeability blocks, and far-borehole trunk fractures paired with channelized high-permeability bands. Pulsed loading delays rapid main fracture breakthrough and extends the microcrack development period, effectively enhancing near-well fracture network complexity and expanding the improved seepage area near the borehole.

5. Propagation Law of Fracture Network and Permeability Evolution in Naturally Fractured Rock Under Pulse Fracturing

The pulsed hydraulic fracturing process of rock containing natural fractures is jointly controlled by natural weak planes and matrix heterogeneity. Both the fracture network and permeability field exhibit remarkable directional and stage-dependent characteristics, which differ distinctly from the uniform radial pattern of intact rock.

5.1. Parallel Natural Fractures

The final fracture propagation pattern and permeability distribution of rock with parallel natural fractures under pulsed hydraulic fracturing are summarized in Figure 6, while Figure 7 illustrates their time-dependent evolution characteristics. In the initial fracture initiation stage, pulsed pressure on the borehole wall transfers stress to surrounding natural fractures. The nearest fracture activates preferentially, with tension-shear damage accumulating on surfaces to form continuous damage zones along fracture paths. The far lower strength of fracture zones relative to intact matrix greatly reduces initial initiation pressure. Damage remains limited in scope with a low propagation rate; other parallel fractures stay unactivated due to insufficient borehole connectivity, with evolution dominated by gradual activation of a single preferential fracture. Correspondingly, seepage is dominated by the extremely low-permeability matrix. The opening of the single preferential fracture creates additional seepage channels with markedly elevated permeability, forming short high-permeability strips. Peak permeability exceeds the matrix by over an order of magnitude, but the overall improvement range is very limited, with unactivated fractures contributing no flow. Permeability enhancement occurs earlier than in intact rock, reflecting the leading effect of natural weak planes on seepage evolution.
During the fracture extension stage, continuous pulsed energy input drives successive activation and rapid propagation of multiple natural fractures, transforming the network from a single-fracture structure to a multi-main-fracture skeleton. Bilateral sub-horizontal fractures extend rapidly, while bottom inclined main fractures advance synchronously, jointly forming the core network skeleton. Driven by matrix heterogeneity, minor branch microcracks initiate at main fracture edges, raising near-borehole damage density and network complexity. Natural fractures provide continuous low-resistance paths that dominate the sharp propagation rate increase, and their spatial distribution directly governs main fracture quantity, orientation and the overall trend. In parallel, simultaneous activation and connection of multiple fractures rapidly form multi-branch high-permeability channels, greatly boosting overall seepage capacity. High-permeability zones of each main fracture expand synchronously with rapid propagation, with length and peak permeability rising to orders of magnitude above the matrix as core transport channels. Permeability in surrounding microdamage zones increases slightly, and contiguous high-permeability regions gradually form near the borehole. All zones interconnect in the near-borehole area to build a radial high-permeability network, with strike and distribution fully controlled by fracture occurrence and showing clear directional features.
In the stable propagation stage, no new macroscopic main fractures form, and network evolution shifts to directional extension of existing fractures along established paths, with the overall structure gradually stabilizing. Each fracture tip maintains a high-damage state to sustain propagation, and branch microcracks increase slightly without altering the overall network pattern. As fractures extend beyond the natural fracture range into the intact matrix, propagation resistance rises markedly, slowing the extension rate. The fracture network features strong directionality and asymmetry: sub-horizontal main fractures have the longest extension as the primary framework, followed by inclined main fractures, with upper fractures showing the weakest development. Matrix heterogeneity only induces minor local trajectory deflections. Correspondingly, the permeability field structure remains fundamentally unchanged, with evolution focused on the directional advance of high-permeability bands along fracture paths. Peak permeability and band width stay basically stable, and the near-borehole high-permeability range stops obvious expansion. Beyond the natural fracture scope, reduced apertures in intact rock cause a slight permeability drop at band ends and slower propagation. The final permeability field shares the same prominent directionality and asymmetry: sub-horizontal bands stretch the furthest with the largest seepage range as primary flow channels, while the far-borehole matrix retains its original low permeability with enhancement concentrated inside fracture channels.
Overall, fracture network evolution and permeability development in parallel fractured rock form a weak-plane-dominated, damage-driven nonlinear process, with sharp seepage growth highly synchronized with fracture breakthrough moments. Natural fractures fundamentally alter initiation positions and propagation paths, lower seepage channel formation thresholds, and govern the seepage field spatial distribution. Cyclic pulsed stress accelerates synchronous activation and coalescence of multiple fractures, indirectly promoting seepage capacity improvement. Ultimately, an asymmetric natural-fracture-supported fracture network framework with attached near-borehole microdamage zones forms, matching a flow structure where trunk fractures undertake primary conduction and near-borehole microdamage zones provide auxiliary seepage channels.

5.2. Inclined Natural Fractures

The final fracture propagation pattern and permeability distribution of rock with inclined natural fractures under pulsed hydraulic fracturing are summarized in Figure 8, while Figure 9 illustrates their time-dependent evolution characteristics. In the initial fracture initiation stage, pulsed pressure on the borehole wall induces only weak surrounding stress concentration, with all natural fractures in an initial response phase. As stress transfers outward, the nearest inclined fracture first reaches the failure threshold and activates, with tension-shear damage accumulating on surfaces to form short continuous inclined damage zones. The far lower strength of fracture zones relative to the intact matrix greatly reduces the initial initiation pressure. Damage remains confined to the near-borehole zone, with other inclined fractures unactivated due to insufficient stress transmission, with gradual initiation of a single preferential weak plane. Correspondingly, seepage is dominated by primary matrix pores with extremely low domain-wide permeability. The opening and slip of the single inclined fracture form effective seepage channels with markedly elevated permeability, generating short inclined high-permeability strips. Peak permeability exceeds the matrix by over an order of magnitude, but the overall improvement range is limited, with disconnected fractures contributing no flow. Permeability enhancement emerges earlier than in intact rock, reflecting the prior promoting effect of natural weak planes.
During the fracture extension stage, continuous pulsed energy input drives activated main fractures to advance rapidly along inclined weak planes, with more fractures successively reaching the initiation threshold. Driven by steady tip stress concentration, main fractures extend toward far-borehole regions at fixed angles with markedly increased length. Fractures at other positions activate sequentially, forming a coordinated multi-trunk propagation pattern. Near-borehole damage density rises continuously, with minor branch microcracks at main fracture edges increasing network complexity. Sequential activation of multiple fracture groups rapidly transforms the network from a single-fracture to a multi-main-fracture structure. In parallel, successive activation and interconnection of multiple inclined fractures rapidly form multi-branch high-permeability channels, delivering a qualitative leap in overall seepage capacity. The high-permeability zones of major fractures expand synchronously toward far-borehole regions, with length and peak permeability rising to orders of magnitude above the matrix as core transport channels. Secondary high-permeability strips form progressively, creating a multi-zone pattern. Contiguous high-permeability regions form near the borehole via intersecting fractures and microdamage, with all zones connecting locally to build a multi-directional inclined network. Zone strike and distribution are fully controlled by natural fracture occurrence, showing distinct directional features.
In the stable propagation stage, no new macroscopic main fractures form, and network evolution shifts to stable coordinated extension of existing fractures along inclined paths, with the overall structure gradually finalized. Fracture tips maintain high damage levels to sustain propagation, while near-borehole damage distribution and magnitude remain largely stable. Minor branch microcrack growth around main fractures does not alter the skeleton structure. As fractures extend beyond the natural fracture range, intact matrix resistance rises markedly, slowing extension rates. The network exhibits clear inclined orientation and asymmetry: preferential-direction main fractures have the longest extension and highest damage as the core, followed by secondary fractures. Matrix heterogeneity only triggers minor local trajectory deflections without changing the overall inclined-dominated pattern. Correspondingly, the permeability field structure remains fundamentally unchanged, with evolution focused on directional advance of high-permeability bands along fracture paths as the seepage pattern finalizes. Peak permeability and band width stay basically stable, and near-borehole high-permeability coverage stops notable expansion. Beyond natural fracture limits, reduced apertures in intact rock cause a slight permeability drop at band ends and slower extension. The final permeability field shares the same inclined orientation and spatial asymmetry: dominant bands stretch the farthest with the highest peak values as primary flow channels, while the far-borehole matrix retains original low permeability with improvement concentrated within fracture channels.
Overall, fracture network evolution and permeability development in inclined fractured rock form a weak-plane-dominated, damage-driven nonlinear process, with seepage capacity jumps highly aligned with fracture breakthrough moments. Inclined natural fractures fundamentally alter initiation positions and propagation directions, lower seepage channel thresholds, and govern the seepage field’s multi-directional distribution. Cyclic pulsed stress accelerates sequential fracture activation and coalescence, indirectly promoting stepped seepage improvement. Ultimately, an asymmetric network with inclined main fractures as the skeleton and attached near-borehole microdamage zones forms, matching a multi-branch seepage structure where trunk fractures undertake primary conduction and microdamage zones provide auxiliary paths.

5.3. Combined Parallel and Inclined Natural Fractures

The final fracture propagation pattern and permeability distribution of rock with both parallel and inclined natural fractures under pulsed hydraulic fracturing are summarized in Figure 10, while Figure 11 illustrates their time-dependent evolution characteristics. In the initial fracture initiation stage, continuous fracturing fluid injection elevates borehole pore pressure through superposition of in situ stress and fluid pressure. Damage remains confined to a tiny near-borehole area, with all outer prefabricated fractures unactivated. The intact central rock core acts as a mechanical barrier, significantly raising the initiation pressure threshold; injected energy is mostly consumed by stress accumulation and microdamage within the core, keeping the rock in a pre-rupture energy accumulation phase without substantial fracture initiation. Correspondingly, the permeability field stays at the intrinsic low matrix level, with only a negligible increment near the borehole wall. The intact core also serves as a seepage barrier: poor primary pore connectivity in dense rock hinders deep fluid infiltration, and closed outer fractures provide no effective seepage space, maintaining extremely low overall seepage capacity.
During the fracture extension stage, fractures initiate once accumulated borehole stress exceeds the rock strength limit. Inclined fractures best aligned with the maximum principal stress and with the lowest energy threshold preferentially form main fractures and extend rapidly along the inclined direction. Secondary fractures at the lower and left borehole sides then initiate sequentially, causing a sharp rise in fracture count. The initiation follows two clear rules: by occurrence, gently inclined and sub-horizontal fractures with smaller angles to the maximum principal stress have lower rupture resistance and activate first; spatially, near-borehole zones with faster stress transfer and higher concentration reach initiation criteria earlier. In parallel, the permeability field jumps stepwise synchronously with main fracture initiation. Preferentially initiated main fractures form the first primary high-permeability channels with an order-of-magnitude increase, matching the position and propagation direction of main fractures in the damage field. As secondary fractures initiate successively, high-permeability strips extend synchronously with branching. Early-activated fractures form continuous seepage paths and constitute the primary seepage network skeleton. Earlier initiation corresponds to earlier permeability growth and higher peak values, and stress-aligned favorable fractures deliver better fluid conductivity and more significant enhancement.
In the stable propagation stage, the main fracture linear propagation rate drops markedly, and network evolution shifts to branch expansion and full-domain fracture activation. Previously unactivated steeply inclined and far-field sub-horizontal fractures successively reach the rupture threshold, initiate and extend outward, gradually forming multiple branch fracture groups. Abundant microcracks form under stress disturbance, ultimately developing a complex network with dominant main fractures, coordinated multi-branch propagation and asymmetric spatial distribution. Early-initiated main and near-borehole fractures act as stress transfer channels to progressively activate distant high-resistance fractures. Later-initiated fractures mostly join the main system as branches, increasing network density and swept area without altering the primary skeleton. Propagation follows a clear chronological rule: main fractures initiate before branch fractures, gently inclined before steep ones, and near-borehole before far-field fractures. Correspondingly, permeability evolution shifts from single-channel abrupt growth to network expansion. Peak permeability of primary channels remains largely stable, while high-permeability zone coverage keeps expanding. Late-initiated fractures become effective seepage branches, and channels of varied occurrences and positions gradually connect to form a multi-path 3D seepage network. Sub-horizontal fractures with good extendability form horizontal trunks dominating long-distance transport, while inclined fractures join as branches to improve vertical connectivity and swept volume. Overall permeability rises steadily with network complexity, no longer relying on single main fracture extension.
Overall, fracture network evolution and permeability development in mixed parallel-inclined fractured rock constitute a damage-driven nonlinear process jointly regulated by fracture occurrence and spatial distribution. Main fractures dominate permeability growth magnitude, while branch fractures expand the seepage swept area, and initiation sequence directly determines the timing and spatial distribution of enhancement. Pulsed loading gradually breaks initiation thresholds of fractures with different occurrences via cyclic stress accumulation, ultimately forming a complex coordinated main-branch fracture network and matching multi-path seepage system.

5.4. Orthogonal Combined Natural Fractures

The final fracture propagation pattern and permeability distribution of rock with orthogonal natural fractures under pulsed hydraulic fracturing are summarized in Figure 12, while Figure 13 illustrates their time-dependent evolution characteristics. In the initial fracture initiation stage, damage is restricted to a narrow near-borehole zone in early injection, and all outer prefabricated fractures stay unactivated with the rock in a stress accumulation state. With continuous superposition of pore pressure and in situ stress, sub-horizontal fractures initiate preferentially to form continuous macroscopic main fractures along the borehole horizontal direction. This priority stems from the match between fracture occurrence and in situ stress: sub-horizontal fractures strike roughly parallel to the maximum principal stress, yielding the lowest tensile rupture energy threshold and activating first, while vertical fractures perpendicular to the maximum principal stress have higher critical stress and remain temporarily inactive. Correspondingly, the permeability field stays uniformly low at matrix intrinsic permeability, with only negligible elevation near the borehole wall. After horizontal main fracture initiation, the permeability field jumps synchronously, forming continuous horizontal high-permeability strips with an order-of-magnitude increment as initial seepage trunks. The intact central rock core acts as a seepage barrier, restricting enhancement to local zones of initiated fractures.
During the fracture extension stage, as horizontal main fractures propagate, fluid pressure and stress concentration transfer outward along fractures, gradually raising vertical stress levels. Once the vertical fracture rupture threshold is reached, vertical fractures initiate formally, transforming the system from a single horizontal main fracture to a horizontal–vertical dual-trunk structure. Meanwhile, slight bending and local branches appear along horizontal fracture paths, more near-borehole secondary fractures activate, and the damage scope expands progressively. By the end of this stage, horizontal and vertical trunk fractures are basically finalized, jointly forming the network core skeleton with bilateral branches and a clear overall outline. The initiation follows a hierarchical rule: horizontal main fractures initiate before vertical ones, and near-borehole fractures before far-field ones, with vertical activation relying on stress transmission via horizontal main fractures. In parallel, vertical fracture initiation triggers the second prominent permeability jump, forming distinct vertical high-permeability strips and formal vertical seepage channels. The seepage system evolves accordingly into a cross-shaped dual-trunk framework. Vertical high-permeability zones expand with vertical fracture propagation, while horizontal zones extend synchronously and produce branches, rapidly expanding high-permeability coverage. More near-borehole secondary fractures activate to form seepage influence zones around trunk channels. By the end of this stage, the two primary high-permeability channels stabilize, and overall seepage capacity improves by an order of magnitude compared with the initial stage.
In the stable propagation stage, linear propagation rates of the two trunk fractures drop markedly, and network evolution shifts from trunk extension to branch expansion and densification. Horizontal branches extend toward the far field, with some deflecting and connecting upon encountering vertical fractures. Vertical main fractures expand continuously and generate secondary branches, and more far-field orthogonal fractures activate successively under stress disturbance. Horizontal and vertical fractures intersect and interconnect, gradually forming a typical orthogonal fracture network. Overall fracture length growth slows, while density and complexity increase steadily with an expanded swept area, dominated by mutual induction and stepwise activation of the two fracture groups. Correspondingly, permeability evolution shifts from abrupt trunk channel growth to network expansion and steady enhancement. Peak permeability of primary channels remains roughly constant, while high-permeability zones expand outward in all directions, with secondary branches forming corresponding high-permeability strips. Horizontal and vertical seepage channels intersect and connect, gradually building an orthogonal 3D seepage network. Successive far-field fracture activation drives high-permeability zones toward model boundaries. Seepage pathway count and network connectivity rise continuously, and overall permeability grows steadily with increasing complexity, driven by improved connectivity and expanded swept volume rather than single trunk linear extension.
Overall, fracture network evolution and permeability development in rock with orthogonal natural fractures form a weak-plane-dominated, damage-driven nonlinear process with distinct hierarchical activation features. The match between fracture occurrence and in situ stress determines the initiation sequence, and cyclic pulsed stress promotes stepwise activation of orthogonal fracture groups. Ultimately, a typical orthogonal fracture network with dual-trunk skeletons and multi-level branches forms, matching a cross-linked seepage system where trunk channels dominate permeability magnitude and branch networks expand the seepage swept volume.

5.5. Combined Parallel, Vertical and Inclined Natural Fractures

The final fracture propagation pattern and permeability distribution of rock with parallel, vertical and inclined mixed natural fractures under pulsed hydraulic fracturing are summarized in Figure 14, while Figure 15 illustrates their time-dependent evolution characteristics. In the initial fracture initiation stage, pulsed pressure induces only mild borehole surrounding stress concentration, with all natural fracture groups in an initial response state. As stress transfers through the matrix, vertical fractures nearest the borehole activate first, with tensile damage accumulating on fracture planes to form steadily extending vertical damage zones. Slightly distant inclined fractures respond gradually and accumulate damage at their near-well ends, while other fractures stay unactivated due to insufficient stress delivery. Damage propagates at a moderate rate, dominated by nearby dominant fracture extension and corresponding to gradual energy accumulation and preferential pathway screening. Correspondingly, seepage is dominated by intrinsic matrix pores with extremely low overall permeability. The opening of the nearest vertical fractures forms effective seepage channels, creating vertical high-permeability strips with prominent enhancement. Inclined fractures form embryonic high-permeability zones to mildly expand the seepage-affected area, while other regions retain matrix-level low permeability. This stage features initial seepage channel construction with limited increment and range, yet permeability improves earlier than in intact rock, reflecting the prior promoting effect of inherent weak planes.
During the fracture extension stage, continuous pulse energy accumulation expands the surrounding stress field to cover more fractures, and multiple sets of varied occurrences successively reach the initiation threshold. The network rapidly transforms from a “one primary + one secondary” pattern to a multi-fracture coordinated propagation system. Fractures in all directions extend intensively and simultaneously, driving sharp morphological change; inclined fractures grow fastest and evolve into secondary main fractures. Near-well damage density rises substantially, with multi-directional fractures interweaving around the borehole to preliminarily form the core of a complex network. In parallel, intensive activation and interconnection of multi-group fractures rapidly form multi-branch high-permeability channels, delivering a qualitative leap in overall seepage capacity. With synchronous multi-directional fracture breakthrough, high-permeability strips form and expand continuously, with steady growth in length and peak permeability. Inclined high-permeability zones grow fastest into secondary core flow-guiding channels. All zones interconnect in the near-well region, forming continuous high-permeability areas alongside microdamage development, greatly expanding the seepage range and building an intricate multi-directional network.
In the stable propagation stage, no new macroscopic main fractures form, and network evolution shifts to steady coordinated extension of existing multi-directional fractures along their occurrences, with the overall pattern gradually finalized. Fracture tips maintain high damage levels to sustain propagation, while near-well damage distribution and magnitude largely stabilize. Minor branch microcracks sprout along main fracture edges, slightly increasing local network complexity. As fractures extend beyond the natural fracture range, intact matrix resistance rises markedly, slowing the extension rate. The final network features multi-directional asymmetric traits: the vertically downward main fracture has the longest extension and highest damage as the core skeleton; inclined main fractures rank second as vital secondary channels; shorter secondary fractures supplement the complex near-well network. Matrix heterogeneity only induces slight local trajectory deflection without altering the overall multi-set fracture-dominated pattern. Consistently, the permeability field sees no fundamental structural change, with core evolution focused on coordinated advancement of multi-directional high-permeability zones along fracture paths. Peak permeability and band width remain largely stable, and near-well high-permeability coverage stops expanding notably. Beyond the natural fracture boundary, reduced apertures in intact rock cause slight permeability drops at zone tips and decelerated extension. The ultimate permeability field also features multi-directional asymmetric distribution, with the far-field matrix retaining original low permeability and enhancement concentrated within fracture channels.
Overall, fracture network evolution and permeability development in rock with three mixed natural fracture types form a damage-driven, multi-weak-plane-dominated nonlinear process, with seepage capacity jumps highly aligned with concentrated multi-fracture breakthrough moments. Mixed fractures lower seepage channel formation thresholds and enrich the spatial distribution dimension of the permeability field. Pulsed loading drives concentrated fracture activation via sustained energy accumulation and triggers an order-of-magnitude surge in flow capacity. The final network and seepage system feature higher complexity and wider spatial coverage than single-occurrence fracture specimens.

5.6. Regulation Laws of Fracture Propagation and Permeability Evolution Controlled by Natural Fracture Attitudes

Regulation laws of fracture propagation and seepage evolution controlled by model parameters are fully displayed through horizontal variation trends of four statistical indices in Figure 16. Mean damage, mean permeability, high permeability area ratio, and damaged area proportion of intact rock are markedly lower than all schemes with natural fractures. Index values of intact rock maintain roughly one half of the corresponding values measured from fractured rock groups. The maximum mean damage and damaged area proportion are generated under single inclined fracture conditions yet smaller permeability growth ranges are recorded compared with orthogonal fracture cases. The peak mean permeability is captured in orthogonal fracture models with superior seepage modification performance relative to other single-fracture schemes.

6. Propagation Mechanism of Fracture Network in Fractured Rock Under Pulse Fracturing

Fracture network propagation in fractured rock under pulsed hydraulic fracturing is a complex mechanical process synergistically governed by three factors: natural fracture weak-plane effect, pulse-induced cyclic fatigue damage, and rock matrix mechanical confinement. Fracture occurrence and spatial combination dominate network configuration and evolutionary paths, while fracture propagation and permeability evolution are strongly spatiotemporally coupled, following a three-stage law of initial incubation, dynamic breakthrough and stable finalization. The propagation mechanism is illustrated in Figure 17.
For single-occurrence fractured rock masses, propagation is jointly controlled by weak-plane directional guidance and pulse-induced fatigue acceleration. For parallel fractured rocks, networks develop mainly horizontally: lower-strength fracture zones concentrate borehole stress and induce preferential fracturing along fracture planes, directly determining main fracture number and strike while greatly reducing initiation pressure and propagation resistance. Cyclic pulsed loading exerts repeated stress impacts at fracture tips, promoting shear slip and tensile opening, accelerating matrix microcrack initiation and coalescence, and enabling simultaneous multi-fracture activation to avoid oversimplified networks from excessive single fracture extension. Beyond natural fracture ranges, elevated matrix resistance sharply slows propagation, and matrix heterogeneity only causes minor local trajectory deflections without altering the overall directional pattern. Inclined fractured rocks follow the same intrinsic mechanism, with inclined weak planes governing oblique network morphology. Pulsed loading accelerates stress transfer to far-field fractures, triggering sequential initiation of inclined fractures at different positions to form a collaborative multi-fracture pattern, while adjacent fracture stress interference further modulates local paths.
For multi-occurrence combined fractured rocks, propagation features hierarchical activation and higher complexity. In parallel-inclined composite rocks, pulse pressure first breaks through the central intact rock core barrier, then propagates along pre-existing weak fractures; fracture occurrence and spatial position jointly determine the energy threshold and initiation sequence. Parallel-vertical orthogonal fractured rocks follow a hierarchical rule prioritizing low-angle, near-well and trunk fractures. Sub-horizontal fractures with optimal maximum principal stress matching and lowest tensile fracture energy initiate first to form the network skeleton, while higher-threshold vertical fractures activate later to fill the network. Far-field fractures rely on trunk stress transmission and show clear initiation lag. For three-type mixed fractured rocks, multi-directional weak planes provide multi-dimensional low-resistance paths. Near-borehole fractures initiate preferentially, while remote ones activate gradually with stress transfer. Once pulse energy reaches the critical threshold, multiple fracture groups break through synchronously, markedly improving network complexity. Multi-directional propagation induces stress superposition and shielding effects, which jointly constrain stable network morphology.
Fracture propagation and permeability evolution exhibit strong positive coupling, representing two synchronous perspectives of the same fracturing process. Fracture growth is the core carrier of permeability enhancement: rocks stay tight and low-permeability without macroscopic fractures, and permeability jumps immediately upon fracture initiation, with network complexity directly governing seepage connectivity. Their spatiotemporal evolutions are fully synchronized, with the three-stage fracture pattern corresponding one-to-one to permeability variation, and fracture initiation sequence directly determining improvement timing with no obvious hysteresis. Fracture occurrence controls both processes via the same mechanism: natural fractures act as both mechanical weak planes shaping fracture geometry and preferential seepage planes governing permeability growth, fully demonstrating the inherent unity of mechanical–seepage coupling.
In summary, fracture network evolution in intact rock is dominated by matrix heterogeneity, ultimately forming complex near-well networks and far-field trunk fractures. For fractured rocks, the evolutionary core is governed by directional activation of natural weak planes, while matrix heterogeneity only regulates local fracture characteristics. Pulsed loading accelerates weak plane activation via accumulated fatigue damage; natural fractures determine evolutionary directionality and hierarchy; and matrix properties constrain propagation rates and local trajectories. Their combined action drives the seepage transition from matrix-dominated low permeability to fracture-dominated high permeability, forming a coupled fracture–seepage structure adapted to rock mass fracture distribution. The above conclusions offer clear references for matching pulse amplitude and frequency to reservoirs with diverse natural fractures and support field parameter optimization for permeability enhancement.

7. Discussion

In this study, mechanisms governing pulsed fracture network propagation within fractured rock were adopted as the research basis, and preferential fracture orientations were not determined by a single factor. It was found that fracture propagation orientations are jointly controlled by in situ stress conditions, borehole-induced stress concentration, initial attitudes of natural fractures and stress interference among adjacent fractures. The dominant constraints on overall macroscopic fracture trends are imposed by the maximum principal in situ stress. Fracture initiation near borehole zones is preferentially triggered by high stress concentration formed around boreholes. Pre-existing natural fractures are preferentially activated once local stress meets fracture failure criteria. Stress perturbation fields are generated by initiated fractures. Fracture deflection and redirection are induced through mutual interference among neighboring fractures, and the preferential fracture orientations observed in this study are finally formed.
Remarkable adjustments are made to fracture initiation positions and propagation trajectories by rock mechanical heterogeneity under pulsed loading. Damage failure tends to occur preferentially inside units with low mechanical strength to trigger local fracture deflection and generate minor secondary microcracks. For rock masses with multiple groups of natural fractures, only slight local modifications of fracture geometry are induced by matrix heterogeneity, while overall propagation trends remain dominated by inherent weak planes. Independent Weibull distributions were adopted to assign mechanical parameters in current simulations. Systematic analysis of such coupled effects will be implemented in follow-up studies.
Obvious differences in the duration of stable fracture growth and evolution can be detected through comparative analysis of simulated cases. Initial fracture initiation positions and overall propagation trends are controlled by spatial attitudes of natural fractures. Local stress fields are continuously altered by stress interference between adjacent fractures. The two above physical factors constitute the primary sources of discrepancies in fracture evolution duration. Local damage thresholds are dynamically adjusted to extend or shorten the evolution stage before stable fracture network formation. Weak disturbances induced by local microcrack generation are produced via pore pressure diffusion and rock mechanical heterogeneity. Minor influences on global propagation laws are exerted by these two factors.
Numerical simulations are performed based on geometric dimensions of laboratory rock samples in the established model. Multiple remote fracture activation responses are observed within confined regions around the injection borehole. Certain mismatches can be found between the geometric scale of the constructed model and real reservoir strata. Field reservoirs tend to exhibit relatively sparse natural fracture distributions, broader pressure propagation coverage and intricate three-dimensional fracture connection configurations. Stress shadow interactions between widely spaced fractures may become less prominent under field geological conditions. The non-contact remote activation mechanism derived from this work is associated with short-distance stress transmission and densely arranged natural fractures. Complete reproduction of full-scale reservoir geological features cannot be easily realized by the current model setup. The simulation results provide theoretical guidance for the propagation of large-scale fracture networks in field fracturing operations.

8. Conclusions

This paper establishes a numerical simulation method for pulsed hydraulic fracturing in heterogeneous fractured rock masses, and conducts simulations of fracture network propagation and permeability evolution for intact rock and fractured rocks with diverse fracture occurrences, revealing the initiation and propagation mechanisms of pulse-induced fracture networks. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
Fracture network propagation in intact rock undergoes three stages: initial initiation, extension and stable propagation. Jointly controlled by damage accumulation and preferential pathways, fractures form a dense-center and sparse-periphery distribution pattern. Spatial heterogeneity of rock mechanical parameters is the primary driver of network complexity. Pulsed loading delays rapid main fracture breakthrough, promotes microcrack development and effectively enhances near-well network complexity.
(2)
Single-occurrence natural fractures dominate network initiation positions and propagation paths, producing highly directional and asymmetric networks. Both parallel and inclined fractured rocks follow the rules of preferential near-fracture activation, sequential multi-fracture propagation and progressive matrix restriction. Fractures closest to the borehole activate first and lower initiation pressure; once extending beyond the natural fracture range, rising matrix resistance slows propagation. Matrix heterogeneity only causes local trajectory deflections without altering the overall directional propagation pattern.
(3)
Fracture propagation in multi-occurrence combined fractured rocks follows a clear hierarchical activation sequence, yielding networks with significantly higher complexity and wider spatial coverage than single-occurrence cases. The initiation sequence is jointly determined by fracture occurrence and borehole distance, generally following the order of low-angle before steep-angle fractures, and near-well before far-field fractures. Fractures of different occurrences induce each other and interconnect progressively, increasing network density and reservoir swept volume.
(4)
Fracture network propagation in fractured rock under pulsed hydraulic fracturing is synergistically controlled by three factors: weak-plane effect, pulse-induced fatigue damage and rock matrix mechanical confinement. Under cyclic pulsed stress, natural fractures can be remotely activated in a non-contact manner; they govern the overall distribution pattern and activation sequence, and dominate propagation along low stress gradient directions. Cyclic stress accelerates fatigue damage accumulation and promotes simultaneous multi-fracture activation. Matrix mechanical properties impose boundary constraints on fracture growth, controlling propagation rate and ultimate length.
(5)
A strong spatiotemporally coupled mechanics–seepage coordination mechanism exists between fracture propagation and permeability evolution, with their three evolutionary stages fully corresponding. Macroscopic main fracture breakthrough triggers the order-of-magnitude permeability surge. After pulsed hydraulic fracturing, the rock permeability exceeds 10 times its initial value, and the permeability of fractured rock is approximately twice that of intact rock. Natural fractures have the dual attributes of mechanical weak planes and preferential seepage channels, ultimately forming a seepage structure with trunk fractures as dominant conduits and microfracture zones as auxiliary paths. Complex fracture networks can drive the reservoir to a high-permeability state.

Author Contributions

H.L.: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing, Investigation. P.Y.: Writing—original draft, Validation, Investigation, Visualization. X.Z.: Validation, Supervision, Writing—review & editing. T.D.: Validation, Investigation, Visualization. B.L.: Validation, Investigation. B.H.: Supervision, Writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52374103 and 52374142), and Jiangsu Province Basic Research Program Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund Project (No. BK20241642).

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Shahzad, U. Achieving Clean Energy Transitions: How Green Innovation and Financial Development Shape Energy Usage. Energy Econ. 2025, 150, 108851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Guo, J.; Zhu, K.; Cheng, Y. Deployment of Clean Energy Technologies towards Carbon Neutrality under Resource Constraints. Energy 2024, 295, 131012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Liu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Kang, Y. The Propagation of Hydraulic Fractures in a Natural Fracture Network: A Numerical Study and Its Implications. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Li, H.; Yan, P.; Cheng, Q.; Chen, J.; Chen, S.; Dong, T.; Li, B.; Huang, B. Experimental Investigation on the Rock-Breaking Efficiency of High-Pressure Jet Drill Rod Perforation in Sandstone Roof. ACS Omega 2026, 11, 32499–32521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Zhao, J.; Ren, L.; Lin, C.; Lin, R.; Hu, D.; Wu, J.; Song, Y.; Shen, C.; Tang, D.; Jiang, H. A Review of Deep and Ultra-Deep Shale Gas Fracturing in China: Status and Directions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 209, 115111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Shen, Z.; Jia, C.; Xia, Y.; Xu, S.; Xia, X.; Cai, J. Interaction between Fracturing Fluids and Shale from the Ziliujing Formation of the Jurassic in the Sichuan Basin and the Mechanism of Imbibition-Driven Oil Displacement. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 7285–7304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Liang, B.; Chen, C.; Jia, C.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Zha, Y.; Wang, R.; Meng, Z.; Wang, H. Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) in Oil and Gas Reservoirs in China: Status, Opportunities and Challenges. Fuel 2024, 375, 132353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xue, Q.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Fang, S. Research Status and Prospects of High-Voltage Pulse Plasma Rock-Fracturing Technology. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 7261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Zhao, Y.; Liu, T.; Lin, B.; Sun, Y. Evaluation of Compressibility of Multiscale Pore-Fractures in Fractured Low-Rank Coals by Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 13133–13143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Liu, C.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X. Apparent Permeability Model for Hydraulically Fractured Coal Seams: Integrating Damage Heterogeneity, Adsorption Swelling, and Klinkenberg Effects. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 3538–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Huang, X.; Zhang, R.; Chen, M.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, L. Simulation of the Production Performance of Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Gas Reservoirs Considering the Complex Fracture Shape. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 1358–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Li, H.; Dong, T.; Huang, B. Mechanisms of proppant transport diversion and confluence in fracture networks of unconventional reservoir. Sci. Rep. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, H.; Liu, B.; He, Q. Visualized Hydraulic Fracture Re-Orientation in Directional Hydraulic Fracturing by Laboratory Experiments in Gelatin Samples. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Chen, B.; Li, S.; Tang, D. Numerical Simulation Study on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation of Multi-Cluster Fracturing of Horizontal Well in Deep Fractured Coal Seams. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2025, 318, 110983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Meng, L.; Zhang, X.; Jin, Y.; Yan, K.; Li, Z.; Fu, H.; Li, S. Prediction Model and Real-Time Diagnostics of Hydraulic Fracturing Pressure for Highly Deviated Wells in Deep Oil and Gas Reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Sun, X.; Zhao, K.; Song, X. Experimental Study on Dynamic Fracture Propagation and Evolution during Coal Seam Supercritical CO2 Fracturing. Phys. Fluids 2024, 36, 077172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Lei, Y.; Sun, Y.; Guo, H.; Wu, J.; Wang, Z.; He, L. Mechanism of Proppant Transport in Wedge-Shaped Rough Fractures during Supercritical CO2 Fracturing. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 18880–18901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Lin, Y.; Ma, T.; Li, C.; Shen, L.; Tan, X.; Luo, K.; Peng, K. Numerical Study of SC-CO2 Jet-Induced Rock Fracturing Using SPH-FEM and the RHT Model: Parameter Effects and Damage Evolution. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 11357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Jaeger, J.; Cook, N.; Zimmerman, R. Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 4th ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  20. Reeves, S.; Pekot, L.; Schatz, J.; Bomar, R.; Dereniewski, E.; Maddox, T. Pulse fracturing tests show mixed results. Oil Gas J. 1999, 97, 12. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng, Q.; Huang, B.; Shao, L.; Zhao, X.; Chen, S.; Li, H.; Wang, C. Combination of Pre-Pulse and Constant Pumping Rate Hydraulic Fracturing for Weakening Hard Coal and Rock Mass. Energies 2020, 13, 5534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. He, P.; Lu, Z.; Lu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Pan, L.; Ouyang, L.; Zhou, J. Experimental Study on Fracture Propagation and Induced Earthquake Reduction by Pulse Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Reservoirs. Gas Sci. Eng. 2023, 110, 204908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Li, H.; Huang, B.; Han, X.; Wu, Z.; Li, H.; Zhao, X. Pulse Effects on Proppant Transport and Dune Shape in Vertical Fracture Applied in Coalbed Methane Mining Engineering during the Pulse Hydraulic Fracturing. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2023, 229, 212128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Li, H.; Chen, S. Field Investigation of Multi-Stage Pulse Hydraulic Fracturing for Improving Permeability of Coal Seam in Directional Long Borehole in Underground Coal Mines. Environ. Earth Sci. 2023, 82, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Nie, B.; Ma, C.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Li, C. A Study of High-Intensity High Voltage Electric Pulse Fracturing—A Perspective on the Energy Distribution of Shock Waves. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2025, 249, 213791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Yang, R.; Lu, M.; Li, A.; Cheng, H.; Jing, M.; Huang, Z.; Li, G. Fracture Propagation and Fatigue Damage Mechanisms in Pulse Hydraulic Fracturing of Deep Coal. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2025, 52, 1074–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Shao, L.; Huang, B.; Zhao, X.; Li, H.; Chen, S. Top Coal Weakening by Pulse Hydraulic Fracturing and Roof Cutting by Directional Hydraulic Fracturing for Control of Hanging Roof in the Face End of Fully Mechanized Top Coal Caving. Lithosphere 2024, 2024, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Perkins, T.; Kern, L. Widths of hydraulic fractures. J. Pet. Technol. 1961, 13, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Belytschko, T.; Black, T. Elastic Crack Growth in Finite Elements with Minimal Remeshing. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 1999, 45, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Al-Busaidi, A.; Hazzard, J.F.; Young, R.P. Distinct Element Modeling of Hydraulically Fractured Lac Du Bonnet Granite. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 2005, 110, B06302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Kar, S.; Chaudhuri, A. Influence of Flow and Geomechanics Boundary Conditions on Hydraulic Fracturing Pattern and Evolution of Permeability between the Wells. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2024, 298, 109949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Zhang, J.; Chen, M.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; He, H.; Yang, H.; Gong, S. Topology Optimization of Orthotropic Static Structures Based on the IGA-EFGM Coupling Method. Structures 2025, 82, 110475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Zhu, Z.; Xie, J.; Du, Y.; Ren, L.; Yang, B.; Zhou, Q.; Gao, M. Theoretical Feasibility Assessment of Hydraulic Fracturing with Microwave Assistance: Insights from a Coupled Electromagnetic-Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical (ETHM) Phase-Field Simulation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2026, 204, 106563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Li, L.; Yang, T.; Tang, C.; Yang, C. Coupling analysis of hydraulic fracturing process in rock. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2003, 22, 1060–1066. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, W.; Wang, C.; Guo, T.; He, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, S.; Qu, Z. Study on the Cracking Mechanism of Hydraulic and Supercritical CO2 Fracturing in Hot Dry Rock under Thermal Stress. Energy 2021, 221, 119886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Wei, C.; Zhu, W.; Yu, Q.; Xu, T.; Jeon, S. Numerical Simulation of Excavation Damaged Zone under Coupled Thermal–Mechanical Conditions with Varying Mechanical Parameters. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2015, 75, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Sun, P.; Dong, G. Analysis on wellbore instability characteristics of fractured shale formation under thermo-hydro-solid-curing coupling. J. Liaoning Petrol. Chem. Univ. 2025, 45, 36–46. [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, Z.; Li, L.; Huang, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, M.; Zuo, J.; Li, A.; Yu, Q. Numerical Investigation on the Propagation Behavior of Hydraulic Fractures in Shale Reservoir Based on the DIP Technique. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2017, 154, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Qu, Y.; Yuan, K.; Wu, Y.; Han, A.; Liu, Y. Study on thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled damage model and fracture propagation mechanism of deep shale under high temperature and high pressure. Geophys. Prospect. Pet. 2026, 65, 764–774. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cheng, L.; Luo, Z.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wu, L. Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Damage Evolution and Fracture Activation in Enhanced Tight Oil Recovery Using a THMD Coupled Model. Comput. Geotech. 2023, 155, 105244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Zhu, W.; Tang, C. Numerical Simulation on Shear Fracture Process of Concrete Using Mesoscopic Mechanical Model. Constr. Build. Mater. 2002, 16, 453–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Wu, L.; Hou, Z.; Xie, Y.; Luo, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Cheng, L.; Wu, X.; Chen, Q.; Huang, L. Fracture Initiation and Propagation of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Fracturing in Calcite-Rich Shale: A Coupled Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanical-Chemical Simulation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2023, 167, 105389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Li, H.; Huang, B.; Cheng, Q.; Zhao, X.; Chen, B.; Zhao, L. Mechanism of single proppant pressure embedded in coal seam fracture. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 7756–7767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Rutqvist, J.; Wu, Y.; Tsang, C.; Bodvarsson, G. A Modeling Approach for Analysis of Coupled Multiphase Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer, and Deformation in Fractured Porous Rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2002, 39, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Zhang, W.; Guo, T.; Qu, Z.; Wang, Z. Research of Fracture Initiation and Propagation in HDR Fracturing under Thermal Stress from Meso-Damage Perspective. Energy 2019, 178, 508–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Zhu, W.; Tang, C. Micromechanical Model for Simulating the Fracture Process of Rock. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2004, 37, 25–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Mardia, K.; Obata, M. A new statistical description of the spatial distribution of minerals in rocks. J. Geol. 1995, 103, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Wei, C.; Li, S.; Yu, L.; Zhang, B.; Liu, R.; Pan, D.; Zhang, F. Study on Mechanism of Strength Deterioration of Rock-Like Specimen and Fracture Damage Deterioration Model Under Pulse Hydraulic Fracturing. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2023, 56, 4959–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Shao, L. The Propagation Law of Controllable Network Fractures by Pulse Hydraulic Fracturing. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China, 2025. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Random distribution of mechanical parameters of naturally fractured rock.
Figure 1. Random distribution of mechanical parameters of naturally fractured rock.
Applsci 16 08363 g001
Figure 2. Mesh generation and fitting curve.
Figure 2. Mesh generation and fitting curve.
Applsci 16 08363 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of rock surface morphologies before and after pulsed fracturing. (a). Experimental result before pulsed fracturing [49]. (b). Numerical simulation result before pulsed fracturing. (c). Experimental result after pulsed fracturing [49]. (d). Numerical simulation result after pulsed fracturing.
Figure 3. Comparison of rock surface morphologies before and after pulsed fracturing. (a). Experimental result before pulsed fracturing [49]. (b). Numerical simulation result before pulsed fracturing. (c). Experimental result after pulsed fracturing [49]. (d). Numerical simulation result after pulsed fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g003
Figure 4. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of intact rock under pulse fracturing.
Figure 4. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of intact rock under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g004
Figure 5. Temporal evolution of fracture propagation in intact rock under pulse fracturing.
Figure 5. Temporal evolution of fracture propagation in intact rock under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g005
Figure 6. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock with parallel natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 6. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock with parallel natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g006
Figure 7. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock with parallel natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 7. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock with parallel natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g007
Figure 8. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock with inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 8. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock with inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g008
Figure 9. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock with inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 9. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock with inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g009
Figure 10. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock containing parallel and inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 10. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock containing parallel and inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g010
Figure 11. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock containing parallel and inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 11. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock containing parallel and inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g011
Figure 12. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock containing orthogonal natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 12. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock containing orthogonal natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g012
Figure 13. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock with orthogonal natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 13. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock with orthogonal natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g013
Figure 14. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock containing parallel, vertical and inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 14. Fracture propagation and permeability evolution law of rock containing parallel, vertical and inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g014
Figure 15. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock with parallel, vertical and inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Figure 15. Temporal evolution of fracture and permeability in rock with parallel, vertical and inclined natural fractures under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g015
Figure 16. Comparison diagram of average rock damage, average permeability, high-permeability proportion and damaged area proportion under various working conditions.
Figure 16. Comparison diagram of average rock damage, average permeability, high-permeability proportion and damaged area proportion under various working conditions.
Applsci 16 08363 g016
Figure 17. Propagation mechanism of fracture network in fractured rock under pulse fracturing.
Figure 17. Propagation mechanism of fracture network in fractured rock under pulse fracturing.
Applsci 16 08363 g017
Table 1. Numerical simulation parameters of pulse fracturing for naturally fractured rock.
Table 1. Numerical simulation parameters of pulse fracturing for naturally fractured rock.
Parameter NameSymbolValueUnitParameter NameSymbolValueUnit
Initial porosity ϕ 0 0.01/Initial formation temperatureT0305.15K
Residual porosity ϕ L 1 × 10−3/Initial thermal conductivity of solid λ l 4W/(m·K)
Internal friction angleθ40degSpecific heat capacity of solid C s 950J/(kg·K)
Rock density ρ s 2700kg/m3Thermal expansion coefficient of solid α T 6 × 10−61/K
Fluid density ρ l 1000kg/m3Elastic modulus of intact rockE50~70GPa
Dynamic viscosity of fluidμ0.001Pa·sPoisson’s ratio of intact rockν0.20~0.24/
Specific heat ratio of fluid γ 1.0066/Tensile strength of intact rockσt12~16MPa
Frequencyf30HZTemperature of injected fluidT293.15K
AmplitudeA9MPaCompressive strength of intact rockσc200~240MPa
Fracture aperturew0.001~0.002mElastic modulus of fractures [48]E3~5GPa
Fracture lengthL0.025~0.035mPoisson’s ratio of fracturesν0.30~0.45/
Fracture quantityn20countsTensile strength of fractures [3]σt0.5~1MPa
Fluid compressibility χ l 4 × 10−101/PaCompressive strength of fracturesσc15~20MPa
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Yan, P.; Zhao, X.; Dong, T.; Li, B.; Huang, B. Mechanism of Fracture Network Propagation and Permeability Evolution in Naturally Fractured Rock Under Pulse Fracturing. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 8363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178363

AMA Style

Li H, Yan P, Zhao X, Dong T, Li B, Huang B. Mechanism of Fracture Network Propagation and Permeability Evolution in Naturally Fractured Rock Under Pulse Fracturing. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(17):8363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Haoze, Peiheng Yan, Xinglong Zhao, Tuo Dong, Binghong Li, and Bingxiang Huang. 2026. "Mechanism of Fracture Network Propagation and Permeability Evolution in Naturally Fractured Rock Under Pulse Fracturing" Applied Sciences 16, no. 17: 8363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178363

APA Style

Li, H., Yan, P., Zhao, X., Dong, T., Li, B., & Huang, B. (2026). Mechanism of Fracture Network Propagation and Permeability Evolution in Naturally Fractured Rock Under Pulse Fracturing. Applied Sciences, 16(17), 8363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178363

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop