Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Energy Production and Energy Storage from Brewer’s Spent Grain (BSG): A Review on Technologies and Enhancements for Reducing Environmental Impact and Increasing Efficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Lightweight CNN–Transformer Hybrid Network for Efficient Face Super-Resolution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Structural Ethical Infeasibility in AI-Enabled Infrastructure Systems: A Constraint-Based Diagnostic Framework

1
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755, USA
2
Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
3
Civil Engineering, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(12), 6222; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16126222 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 May 2026 / Revised: 15 June 2026 / Accepted: 17 June 2026 / Published: 20 June 2026

Abstract

AI-enabled infrastructure systems increasingly govern access to emergency services, disaster relief, and utility restoration, yet they routinely produce inequitable outcomes even when allocation algorithms apply procedurally neutral rules. The standard explanation locates the cause inside the algorithm. This paper argues instead that inequity arises from the interaction between the algorithm and the physical environment in which it operates: network topology, resource locations, and demand distribution jointly constrain what any policy can achieve, and when those constraints are sufficiently binding, ethical infeasibility is structural rather than algorithmic. We introduce a constraint-based formulation that embeds ethical requirements into the feasible region, and a hierarchical Irreducible Infeasible Subsystem (IIS) procedure that attributes infeasibility to rule design, algorithmic choice, or physical infrastructure. We further establish the Structural Infeasibility Theorem, deriving closed-form bounds on inter-group disparity across all feasible policies. The framework was applied to zone-decomposable infrastructure allocation problems generally, with a metropolitan ambulance-dispatch system serving as a concrete instantiation. The study delivers four findings. First, the minimum-service violation may not be caused by the allocation algorithm itself; rather, it may arise from the physical layout of the infrastructure. Second, the observed efficiency–equity trade-off may not be an unavoidable feature of equitable allocation, but may instead reflect the difficulty of achieving equity within an underbuilt system. Third, before new infrastructure is added, improvements in equity may represent harm redistribution rather than harm reduction. Fourth, the IIS certificate can be translated into a concrete capital-investment requirement, showing what physical change may be needed to restore ethical feasibility.
Keywords: ethical AI; infrastructure systems; constraint programming; algorithmic fairness; irreducible infeasible subsystem; emergency medical services; equity; demographic parity ethical AI; infrastructure systems; constraint programming; algorithmic fairness; irreducible infeasible subsystem; emergency medical services; equity; demographic parity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chowdhury, S.; Quddus, M.A.; Alzarrad, A. Structural Ethical Infeasibility in AI-Enabled Infrastructure Systems: A Constraint-Based Diagnostic Framework. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 6222. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16126222

AMA Style

Chowdhury S, Quddus MA, Alzarrad A. Structural Ethical Infeasibility in AI-Enabled Infrastructure Systems: A Constraint-Based Diagnostic Framework. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(12):6222. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16126222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chowdhury, Sudipta, Md Abdul Quddus, and Ammar Alzarrad. 2026. "Structural Ethical Infeasibility in AI-Enabled Infrastructure Systems: A Constraint-Based Diagnostic Framework" Applied Sciences 16, no. 12: 6222. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16126222

APA Style

Chowdhury, S., Quddus, M. A., & Alzarrad, A. (2026). Structural Ethical Infeasibility in AI-Enabled Infrastructure Systems: A Constraint-Based Diagnostic Framework. Applied Sciences, 16(12), 6222. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16126222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop