Next Article in Journal
A Hybrid Swin–Mamba UNet for Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Iterative Calibration of an Archard Wear Model from Production Data: Framework, Industrial Validation and Transferability Assessment for Sheet Metal Stamping
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adaptive Boundary-Aware Fact-Checker Placement for Misinformation Suppression in Social Networks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Digital Well-Control Twin for Pressure-Window Management, Kick and Loss Risk Assessment, and Hybrid Bottom-Hole Pressure Prediction

by
Seitzhan Zaurbekov
and
Kadyrzhan Zaurbekov
*
Institute of Metallurgy and Ore Beneficiation, Satbayev University, 22а Satbaev Str., Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(12), 5920; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16125920
Submission received: 21 May 2026 / Revised: 9 June 2026 / Accepted: 9 June 2026 / Published: 11 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Decision Support Systems and Their Applications)

Abstract

Well control during drilling requires continuous assessment of bottom-hole pressure (BHP) relative to the pressure window bounded by formation and fracture pressures. This study presents a reduced-order, physics-guided digital-twin framework for well-control decision support, kick and loss risk assessment, and hybrid BHP prediction. The framework is intended as a computational decision-support prototype rather than a fully deployed, real-time, field-validated digital twin. It combines pressure-window calculations, dimensionless risk indices, bounded machine-learning correction, scenario-based event simulation, an interactive engineering dashboard, and 3D safety-envelope visualization. The machine-learning layer was trained on a predominantly augmented drilling dataset containing 909 cases, including nine field-related baseline records and 900 synthetically generated cases, and was used as a constrained correction mechanism rather than a replacement for the physics-based model. On the held-out test set, the BHP regression model achieved R2 = 0.987, MAE = 108.6 psi, and RMSE = 215.7 psi, while the well-control status classifier achieved an accuracy of 98.35%. Scenario simulations reproduced representative kick-prone and loss-prone conditions and tracked the evolution of BHP, the Pressure Safety Index, the Kick Risk Index, and the Loss Risk Index. The results show that the proposed workflow can identify underbalanced states, quantify pressure margins, evaluate mud-weight sensitivity, and support visual interpretation of well-control risk. Further field validation, real-time data integration, uncertainty quantification, and robustness testing are required before operational deployment.
Keywords: well control; digital twin; bottom-hole pressure; pressure window; kick risk; lost circulation; machine learning; hybrid modeling; drilling safety; decision support well control; digital twin; bottom-hole pressure; pressure window; kick risk; lost circulation; machine learning; hybrid modeling; drilling safety; decision support

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaurbekov, S.; Zaurbekov, K. Digital Well-Control Twin for Pressure-Window Management, Kick and Loss Risk Assessment, and Hybrid Bottom-Hole Pressure Prediction. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 5920. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16125920

AMA Style

Zaurbekov S, Zaurbekov K. Digital Well-Control Twin for Pressure-Window Management, Kick and Loss Risk Assessment, and Hybrid Bottom-Hole Pressure Prediction. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(12):5920. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16125920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaurbekov, Seitzhan, and Kadyrzhan Zaurbekov. 2026. "Digital Well-Control Twin for Pressure-Window Management, Kick and Loss Risk Assessment, and Hybrid Bottom-Hole Pressure Prediction" Applied Sciences 16, no. 12: 5920. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16125920

APA Style

Zaurbekov, S., & Zaurbekov, K. (2026). Digital Well-Control Twin for Pressure-Window Management, Kick and Loss Risk Assessment, and Hybrid Bottom-Hole Pressure Prediction. Applied Sciences, 16(12), 5920. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16125920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop