Next Article in Journal
Plant-Derived Biostimulants and Liposomal Formulations in Sustainable Crop Protection and Stress Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
From Data to Autonomy: Integrating Demographic Factors and AI Models for Expert-Free Exercise Coaching
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cost Analysis and Optimization of Modern Power System Operations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

System Value Assessment and Heterogeneous Cost Allocation of Long-Duration Energy Storage Systems: A Public Asset Perspective

1
Inner Mongolia Power Trading Center Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010000, China
2
School of Electric Power, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010080, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 489; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010489
Submission received: 13 November 2025 / Revised: 29 December 2025 / Accepted: 31 December 2025 / Published: 3 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Power Systems, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

Long-duration energy storage (LDES) can deliver system-wide flexibility and decarbonization benefits, yet investment is often hindered because these benefits are diffuse and not fully monetized under conventional market structures. A public-asset-oriented valuation and cost-allocation framework is proposed for LDES. First, LDES externality benefits are quantified through a system-level optimization-based simulation on a stylized aggregated regional network, with key indicators including thermal generation cost, carbon penalty, renewable curtailment cost, involuntary load shedding, and end-user electricity expenditures. Second, LDES investment costs are allocated among thermal generators, renewable operators, grid entities, and end users via a benefit-based Nash bargaining mechanism. In the case study, introducing LDES reduces thermal generation cost by 3.92%, carbon penalties by 5.59%, and renewable curtailment expenditures by 7.07%, while eliminating load shedding. The resulting cost shares are 46.9% (renewables), 28.7% (end users), 22.4% (thermal generation), and 0.5% (grid entity), consistent with stakeholder-specific benefit distributions. Sensitivity analyses across storage capacity and placement further show diminishing marginal returns beyond near-optimal sizing and systematic shifts in cost responsibility as benefit patterns change. Overall, this framework offers a scalable, economically efficient, and equitable strategy for cost redistribution, supporting accelerated LDES adoption in future low-carbon power systems.
Keywords: long-duration energy storage; cost allocation; externality value; Nash bargaining; public asset long-duration energy storage; cost allocation; externality value; Nash bargaining; public asset

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Han, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Han, R. System Value Assessment and Heterogeneous Cost Allocation of Long-Duration Energy Storage Systems: A Public Asset Perspective. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010489

AMA Style

Wang H, Han Y, Li Z, Li J, Han R. System Value Assessment and Heterogeneous Cost Allocation of Long-Duration Energy Storage Systems: A Public Asset Perspective. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(1):489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010489

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Hao, Yue Han, Zhongchun Li, Jingyu Li, and Ruyue Han. 2026. "System Value Assessment and Heterogeneous Cost Allocation of Long-Duration Energy Storage Systems: A Public Asset Perspective" Applied Sciences 16, no. 1: 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010489

APA Style

Wang, H., Han, Y., Li, Z., Li, J., & Han, R. (2026). System Value Assessment and Heterogeneous Cost Allocation of Long-Duration Energy Storage Systems: A Public Asset Perspective. Applied Sciences, 16(1), 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010489

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop