This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
An LLM–MCDM Framework with Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Recommendation Systems: A Case Study in Food Preference
by
Thanathorn Phoka
Thanathorn Phoka 1,†
,
Thanwa Wathahong
Thanwa Wathahong 2
and
Pornpimon Boriwan
Pornpimon Boriwan 3,*,†
1
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University, 99 Village No. 9, Tha Pho, Muang District, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
2
Technology Management and Innopreneurship Program, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phayathai Rd., Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, 123 Village No. 16 Mittraphap Rd., Nai-Muang, Muang District, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010117 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 November 2025
/
Revised: 11 December 2025
/
Accepted: 17 December 2025
/
Published: 22 December 2025
Abstract
Food recommender systems are pivotal in helping people make optimal dietary choices based on tremendous amounts of data. Extant studies offer different methods and techniques, but the combination of similarity search, large language models (LLMs), and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) remains underexplored. This study proposes a new system that leverages all three. First, we utilize an LLM to suggest queries from the same domain as the dish database. Then, the queries are vectorized and used for similarity search to generate a preliminary list of suggested menu items. Next, multiple LLMs provide scores for each item, which become the MCDM inputs, where Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) enhances the weighted sum scalarization technique. We evaluated the prototype on three publicly available dish datasets and at classification thresholds of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75, and the proposed domain-adaptation approach consistently outperformed the baseline query. For example, at the 0.50 threshold, precision ranged from 49.11% to 56.60%, compared with 35.40% for the baseline. Furthermore, aggregating multiple LLMs mitigates single-model bias in recommendations. To substantiate this, a bootstrap evaluation of the proposed LCCC-based consensus weighting confirms that both the estimated weights and the induced rankings are numerically stable under sampling perturbations. To further ensure the robustness and reliability of the proposed system, we validate the results against other established weighting schemes and state-of-the-art MCDM methods. Moreover, Kendall’s -based comparisons across weighting schemes and multiple MCDM methods confirm that the proposed LCCC-based framework produces highly consistent and statistically significant rankings, demonstrating strong robustness to methodological choices. This paper contributes a system architecture and design that can be adopted for other domains of recommender systems where the capability of multiple LLMs can benefit complex and multifaceted decision-making processes.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Phoka, T.; Wathahong, T.; Boriwan, P.
An LLM–MCDM Framework with Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Recommendation Systems: A Case Study in Food Preference. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010117
AMA Style
Phoka T, Wathahong T, Boriwan P.
An LLM–MCDM Framework with Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Recommendation Systems: A Case Study in Food Preference. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(1):117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010117
Chicago/Turabian Style
Phoka, Thanathorn, Thanwa Wathahong, and Pornpimon Boriwan.
2026. "An LLM–MCDM Framework with Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Recommendation Systems: A Case Study in Food Preference" Applied Sciences 16, no. 1: 117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010117
APA Style
Phoka, T., Wathahong, T., & Boriwan, P.
(2026). An LLM–MCDM Framework with Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Recommendation Systems: A Case Study in Food Preference. Applied Sciences, 16(1), 117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010117
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.