Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Job Satisfaction Trends: A Text Mining Analysis of Employee Reviews Using the DMR Topic Model
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Data Preprocessing
2.3. Topic Coherence
2.4. DMR (Dirichlet-Multinomial Regression) Topic Model
3. Results
3.1. Topic Analysis
3.2. Topic Trends Analysis
- Ascending Patterns (Topics 18–23): Topics exhibiting increasing probability distributions post-COVID-19 included work–life balance (Topic 18), work systems (Topic 19), organizational culture (Topic 20), employee benefits (Topic 21), workplace environment (Topic 22), and software development (Topic 23). Work–life balance demonstrated notable volatility, with a sharp increase in August following a temporary decline in March 2020. Working system-related discourse showed overall upward momentum despite periodic fluctuations. Cultural topics displayed an increased amplitude of variation post-pandemic. Benefit-related discussions peaked in April 2020 after maintaining stability pre-COVID-19. Workplace environment topics showed amplified fluctuations with an overall positive trend from January 2020. Software development-related discourse exhibited consistent growth from March 2020. Working conditions, identified as a critical factor in job satisfaction in the ICT industry [18], include factors such as ventilation, lighting, tools, workspace, and facilities [19,20]. Topics such as work–life balance (Topic 18), working system (Topic 19), Organizational Culture (Topic 20), Employee benefits (Topic 21), and workplace environment and location (Topic 22) are directly associated with working conditions.
- Descending Patterns (Topics 3–6, 10, 11, 13): Topics showing declining trends post-COVID-19 included annual salary (Topic 3), task characteristics (Topic 4), supervisors (Topic 5), miscellaneous (Topic 6), commuting and overtime (Topic 10), work-related stress (Topic 11), and welfare (Topic 13). Notably, work stress peaked in January 2020 before showing an overall decline.
- Stable Patterns: The remaining topics generally maintained consistent distributions, with some exceptions. Topic 24 (workplace location and environment) exhibited a unique pattern: despite an overall flat linear trend, it showed decline after June 2019, followed by an increasing trend from January 2020 post-COVID-19.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- OECD. The Surge of Teleworking: A New Tool for Local Development? OECD Policy Brief; OECD: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Sheril, A. Remote Work Frequency Before and After COVID-19 in the United States 2020. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1122987/change-in-remote-work-trends-after-covid-in-usa/ (accessed on 21 February 2025).
- Gallup. Work Stable at Higher Rate Post-Pandemic. 2023. Available online: https://news.gallup.com/poll/510785/remote-work-stable-higher-rate-post-pandemic.aspx (accessed on 21 February 2025).
- Hopkins, J.; Bardoel, A. The future is hybrid: How organisations are designing and supporting sustainable hybrid work models in post-pandemic Australia. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selimovic, J.; Pilav-Velic, A.; Krndzija, L. Digital workplace transformation and innovation in the financial service sector. In Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation: Theory and Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 375–396. [Google Scholar]
- Papaioannou, S.K. ICT and economic resilience: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Econ. Model. 2023, 128, 106500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vet, J.M.; Nigohosyan, D.; Ferrer, J.N.; Gross, A.K.; Kuehl, S.; Flickenschild, M. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on EU Industries; European Parliament: Strasbourg, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, C.G. A study on the changes in the ICT industry after the COVID-19 pandemic. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2023, 123, 64–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seeber, I.; Johannes, E. Working from home with flexible and permeable boundaries: Exploring the role of digital workplace tools for job satisfaction. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2023, 65, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stobbe, E.J.; Groenewegen, P.P.; Schäfer, W. Job satisfaction of general practitioners: A cross-sectional survey in 34 countries. Hum. Resour. Health 2021, 19, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleischer, J.; Wanckel, C. Creativity in policy capacity: Organizational and individual determinants. Public Adm. Rev. 2024, 84, 218–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Yang, K.Q.; Peng, T.Q.; Heo, R.; Liu, H. Exploring Social Desirability Response Bias in Large Language Models: Evidence from GPT-4 Simulations. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.15442. [Google Scholar]
- Sainju, B.; Hartwell, C.; Edwards, J. Job satisfaction and employee turnover determinants in Fortune 50 companies: Insights from employee reviews from Indeed. com. Decis. Support Syst. 2021, 148, 113582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coughlan, M.; Cronin, P.; Ryan, F. Survey research: Process and limitations. Int. J. Ther. Rehabil. 2009, 16, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakin, T. Why You Shouldn’t Ignore Glassdoor; HR Magazine: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, J.R.; Mathur, A. The value of online surveys: A look back and a look ahead. Internet Res. 2018, 28, 854–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.J.; Choi, S.Y. Effects of organizational culture on employer attractiveness of hotel firms: Topic modeling approach. Complexity 2022, 2022, 4402673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mimno, D.; McCallum, A. Topic models conditioned on arbitrary features with dirichlet-multinomial regression. arXiv 2012, arXiv:1206.3278. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, V.-A.; Boyd-Graber, J.; Resnik, P.; Miler, M. Tea party in the house: A hierarchical ideal point topic model and its application to republican legislators in the 112th congress. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Beijing, China, 26–31 July 2015; pp. 1438–1448. [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, M.E.; Stewart, B.M.; Tingley, D. Navigating the local modes of big data. In Computational Social Science; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; Volume 51, pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- ISO20488:2018; Online Consumer Reviews—Principles and Requirements for Their Collection, Moderation and Publication. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
- Vriens, E.; Szekely, A.; Lipari, F.; Antonioni, A.; Sánchez, A.; Tummolini, L.; Andrighetto, G. Assessing the effects of pandemic risk on cooperation and social norms using a before-after COVID-19 comparison in two long-term experiments. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.; Kim, J.; Singh, A.; Erdem, M.; Hardin, A. Factors predicting hotel recommendations: A comparison of guest feedback before and after the hotel closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2024, 25, 1038–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouras, C.; Tsogkas, V. Improving text summarization using noun retrieval techniques. In Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems: 12th International Conference, KES 2008, Zagreb, Croatia, 3–5 September 2008, Proceedings, Part II 12; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 593–600. [Google Scholar]
- Kudo, T. MeCab: Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer. 2010. Available online: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=http://mecab.sourceforge.net/ (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Park, K. An Empirical Study of Tokenization Strategies for Various Korean NLP Tasks. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.02534. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, J.; Gerrish, S.; Wang, C.; Boyd-Graber, J.; Blei, D. Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–10 December 2009; Volume 22. [Google Scholar]
- Newman, D.; Lau, J.H.; Grieser, K.; Baldwin, T. Automatic evaluation of topic coherence. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2–4 June 2010; pp. 100–108. [Google Scholar]
- Steyvers, M.; Griffiths, T. Probabilistic topic models. In Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2007; pp. 439–460. [Google Scholar]
- Blei, D.M. Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 2012, 55, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, M.; Kim, S.; Lee, K. Ensemble analysis of topical journal ranking in bioinformatics. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2017, 68, 1564–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.H. What rather than how: A DMR topic modeling analysis of news coverage on the British Museum. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), Jeju, Republic of Korea, 13–16 February 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 167–173. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Won, J.H.; Lee, D.; Kwak, K.T. Customer shopping experience in a South Korea’s Government-run home shopping channel for small and medium enterprises based on critical incident technique and unsupervised machine learning analysis. Telemat. Inform. 2022, 68, 101777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koochemeshkian, P.; Bouguila, N. Flexible Distribution Approaches to Enhance Regression and Deep Topic Modelling Techniques. Expert Syst. 2025, 42, e13789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayanan Venkit, P.; Srinath, M.; Gautam, S.; Venkatraman, S.; Gupta, V.; Passonneau, R.J.; Wilson, S. The Sentiment Problem: A Critical Survey towards Deconstructing Sentiment Analysis. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.12318. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.; Deng, Y.; Liu, B.; Pan, S.J.; Bing, L. Sentiment analysis in the era of large language models: A reality check. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.15005. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammad, S.M. Sentiment analysis: Detecting valence, emotions, and other affectual states from text. In Emotion Measurement; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2016; pp. 201–237. [Google Scholar]
- Tsytsarau, M.; Palpanas, T. Survey on mining subjective data on the web. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2012, 24, 478–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mcauliffe, J.; Blei, D. Supervised topic models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2007, 20, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Mohr, J.W.; Bogdanov, P. Introduction—Topic models: What they are and why they matter. Poetics 2013, 41, 545–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Resnik, P.; Armstrong, W.; Claudino, L.; Nguyen, T.; Boyd-Graber, J. Beyond LDA: Exploring supervised topic modeling for depression-related language in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality, Denver, CO, USA, 5 June 2015; pp. 99–107. [Google Scholar]
- Ganga, A. Employees satisfaction in different industries: An exploratory review of the literature. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Syst. 2022, 7, 333–340. [Google Scholar]
- KANTAR. Connecting with the Workforce; KANTAR: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Arora, S.; Vyas, S. Job satisfaction at the time of COVID-19: An investigation of information technology sector in India. Mukt Shabd J. 2020, 9, 251–263. [Google Scholar]
- Zöllner, K.; Sulíková, R. Teleworking and its influence on job satisfaction. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. Res. 2021, 558863, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Smet, A.; Dowling, B.; Mugayar-Baldocchi, M.; Schaninger, B. ‘Great attrition’ or ‘great attraction’? The choice is yours. McKinsey Q. 2021, 8. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/great-attrition-or-great-attraction-the-choice-is-yours (accessed on 2 March 2025).
- Kim, D.; Kang, J.; Lim, J.I. Comparative Analysis of Job Satisfaction Factors, Using LDA Topic Modeling by Industries: The Case Study of Job Planet Reviews. J. Inf. Technol. Serv. 2016, 15, 157–171. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, B.; Lee, C.; Choi, I.; Kim, J. Analyzing determinants of job satisfaction based on two-factor theory. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Formenti, B.; Gregori, N.; Crosato, V.; Marchese, V.; Tomasoni, L.R.; Castelli, F. The impact of COVID-19 on communicable and non-communicable diseases in Africa: A narrative review. Le Infez. Med. 2022, 30, 30. [Google Scholar]
- Tabish, S.A. COVID-19 pandemic: Emerging perspectives and future trends. J. Public Health Res. 2020, 9, 1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marani, M.; Katul, G.G.; Pan, W.K.; Parolari, A.J. Intensity and frequency of extreme novel epidemics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2105482118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Date | Before Filtering | After Filtering | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Reviews | Ratio (%) | Number of Reviews | Ratio (%) | |
May 2019 | 3655 | 6.95 | 2184 | 7.31 |
Jun 2019 | 3234 | 6.15 | 1893 | 6.34 |
Jul 2019 | 3617 | 6.88 | 2100 | 7.03 |
Aug 2019 | 3266 | 6.21 | 1885 | 6.31 |
Sep 2019 | 2971 | 5.65 | 1786 | 5.98 |
Oct 2019 | 2979 | 5.67 | 1777 | 5.95 |
Nov 2019 | 3140 | 5.97 | 1775 | 5.94 |
Dec 2019 | 3175 | 6.04 | 1758 | 5.89 |
Jan 2020 | 3929 | 7.48 | 2088 | 6.99 |
Feb 2020 | 3610 | 6.87 | 1915 | 6.41 |
Mar 2020 | 3225 | 6.14 | 1775 | 5.94 |
Apr 2020 | 2807 | 5.34 | 1558 | 5.22 |
May 2020 | 2818 | 5.36 | 1575 | 5.27 |
Jun 2020 | 3158 | 6.01 | 1752 | 5.87 |
Jul 2020 | 3610 | 6.87 | 2079 | 6.96 |
Aug 2020 | 3367 | 6.41 | 1964 | 6.58 |
Total | 52,561 | 100 | 29,864 | 100 |
N-Gram | Examples |
---|---|
Uni-grams | This, is, not, a, pipe |
Bi-grams | This is, is not, not a, a pipe |
Tri-grams | This is not, is not a, not a pipe |
Main Category | Topic Number | Topic Name | Keyword | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Leadership and management | 1 | CEO | CEO, Representative, Meeting, Mindset, Employee, Opinion, Resignation, Communication, Management, Executives, Team Leader, Director, Representative Director, Executive Officer, Old-fashioned (Conservative), Disregard, Practitioner, Contents, Department Head, Board members, Leaving Work, going to Work, Flattery, Senior, Report, Schedule, Snack, Division head, Middle manager, Head, Career |
5 | Supervisor | Team Leader, Evaluation, Politics, Team member, Competence, Employee, Responsibility, Leader, Resignation, Upper management, Old-fashioned, Practical work, Job position, Practitioner, Executive Officer, CEO, Job title, Managerial level, Internal politics, Executives, Circle, Performance evaluation, Human resources, Department head, performance, Recognition, Promotion, Supervisor, Middle manager, Treatment | ||
9 | Executives | Executives, Mindset, Resignation, Representative, Management, Responsibility, Executive, Practitioner, Board members, Future, Manager, Practical work, Interest, opinion, Job transition, Politics, Circumstance, Middle manager, Industry, help, communication, Struggle, Leader, Senior, IPO, Present, Owner, attitude, Reassignment, Coffee | ||
14 | Internal politics | Old-fashioned, Supervisor, Politics, Resignation, Female, Employee, Senior, Salary, Read the atmosphere, Territorial behavior, Job position, Internal politics, Male, Team dinner, Drinking, Circle, leaving work on time, Able to leave work on time, Career, New employee, Gossip, Authoritarian culture, Lunchtime, School, Disregard, Superior, Subordinate, Corporate life, Promotion, Smoking Attitude | ||
2 | Work and life balance | 18 | Work and life balance | Annual salary, Welfare, Work–life balance, Job transition, Career, Annual salary increase, Workload, Same industry, New employee, Industry, Career, Desire, Treatment, compensation package, team by team, Old-fashioned, Effort, Work environment, System, Entry-level salary, Bonus, Incentive, Pressure to use annual leave, Stability, Department by department, Able to leave work on time, Salary table, Overtime work |
3 | Organizational culture and atmosphere | 8 | Atmosphere | Atmosphere, Flexibility, Welfare, Annual leave, Horizontal, Culture, Environment, Read the atmosphere, Commuting, System, Communication, Using annual leave, Overtime work, Work environment, Vertical, Pressure to use annual leave, Vacation, Intervention, Autonomy, Team dinner, Respect, Available, Stress, Opinion, Adaptation, Leaving work, Job position, Position, Effort, Team member, Age group |
12 | Culture | Development, Culture, Opportunity, Effort, Atmosphere, Performance, Organization, Member, Compensation, Colleague, Assessment, Environment, Passion, Executives, System, Decision making, Leader, Vision, Competence, Communication, Change, Autonomy, Talent, Responsibility, Organizational culture, Horizontal, Objective, Sharing, Collaboration, Will, System | ||
20 | Cultural system | Culture, Compensation, Old-fashioned, Vertical, Military culture, Team dinner, Authoritarian culture, Internal politics, Change, Executive, Circle, Vertical culture, Effort, Report, Military style culture, Military, Organization, Organizational culture, Military-style, Horizontal culture, Drinking, Seoul, Image, Adaptation, Innovation, Hierarchical obedience, Vertical organizational culture, Overtime work, Building, Outdated, Pride | ||
4 | Job characteristics and workload | 4 | Task | Task, Schedule, Meeting, Portfolio, Sharing, Process, Project progress, Document, Program, Test, Data, Outcome, Approach, Plat, Quality, Practitioner, Report, Brand, Help. Process, Environment, Coordination, Maintenance, Image, Report, Operator, Analysis, Feedback, Material, Explanation, Function |
11 | Work stress | Performance, Stress, Revenue, Performance pressure, Incentive, Salary, Pay, Base salary, Assessment, Employee, New employee, Manager, Burden, Team leader, Consultation, Structure, Competition, Sales pressure, Adaptation, Internet, Mental State, Senior, Field, Contract, Promotion, Knowledge, Event, Superior, Job, Incentive system | ||
19 | Work system | System, Process, Operation, Welfare, Scale, Overtime work, Unsystematic, Human resources, Career, Job position, Employee, Handover, Allocation, Procedure, Management, Human resource management, Fundamental, Adaptation, Practical work, Recruitment, Help, Medium-sized company, Workload, Composition, format, Regulation, Procedure, Use of annual leave, Approach, Plan | ||
23 | Software development | Developer, Technology, Competence, Product, Environment, Treatment, Study, New employee, Job category, Developer treatment, Technical expertise, Timeline, Maintenance, Development, Investment, Interest, Site, Research, Opportunity, Business, Process, Effort, Software, New, Knowledge, Development job field, Background, Technology development, Function, Awareness | ||
5 | Workplace environment | 2 | Workplace environment | Going to work, Building, Restroom, Lunch break, COVID-19, meeting, Space, Journalist, Article, Team dinner, Chair, Lunch, Being late, Remote work, Notice, Refrigerator, Cleaning, Workshop, Desk, Air conditioner, Summer, Laptop, Partition, Meeting room, Snack, Coffee machine, Elevator, Mask, Computer, Office relocation, Supplies |
7 | Employment types | Temporary employee, Intern, Full-time employee, Dispatch employee, Conversion to full-time employment, Recruitment, Opportunity, Treatment, Transition, Contract, Discrimination, Read the atmosphere, At the time, Employment, Temporary worker, Facility, Open recruitment, Leaving work on time, Practical work, Able to leave work on time, Supervisor, Interview, Transition from contract to full-time employment, Dispatched contract worker, Welfare, Building, Full-time recruitment, Weight, Duty | ||
10 | Commuting, overtime work | Overtime work, Leaving work, Monthly salary, Going to work, Overtime allowance, Read the atmosphere, Allowance, Annual leave, Team dinner, Weekend, Employee, Resignation, Leaving work on time, Weekend work, Vacation, Meeting, New employee, Lunch, Working on weekends, Stress, Full capacity, Dinner, Lunch break, Timeline, Event, Holiday, Out-of-office work, President, Task, Workload | ||
22 | Workplace location and environment | Welfare, Location, Building, Commuting, Facilities, In-house cafe, Lunch, Overtime work, In-house cafeteria, Meal, Cafeteria, Going to work, Lunch break, Seoul (The capital of South Korea), Surroundings, Coffee, Complimentary, Team by Team, Pangyo (A place where many ICT-related companies are located in South Korea), Gym, Developer, Convenience, Snack, Area, Nearby, Commuter bus, Discount, Shuttle bus, Golf | ||
24 | Business trip and dispatch | Business trip, China, Abroad, Foreigner, Seoul, Province, English, Executive, Headcount, Dispatch, Business trip allowance, Area, Developer, Japan, Opportunity, United States, Site, Overseas business trip, Salary, Busan, On-site, Korean, Regional business trip, Chinese, Youth, Situation, Recruitment, Response, Korean branch, Life | ||
6 | Company policies | 0 | Vacation and annual leave | Welfare, Overtime work, Annual leave, Read the atmosphere, Flexibility, Annual salary, System, Regulation, Vacation, Salary, Leaving work, Available, Use of annual leave, Pressure to use annual leave, Leaving work on time, Treatment, Workload, Environment, Promotion, Career, Developer treatment, Able to leave work on time, Investment, Career, Workload, Promotion opportunity, Senior pressure regarding annual leave, Comparative freedom, Superior, Commuting time |
7 | Compensation | 3 | Annual salary | Annual salary, New employee, Job position, Resignation, Monthly salary, Job transition, Assessment, Career, Promotion, Salary increase, Salary negotiation, Employee, Team leader, Structure, Experienced hire, Annual leave, Department manager, Entry-level salary, Superior, Years of experience, Assistant manager, Treatment, Inverted pyramid structure, Competence, Increase, Meaning, Headcount |
13 | Welfare | Welfare, Salary, Stability, Workplace environment, Effort, Headcount, System, Treatment, Atmosphere, Size, Regulation, Environment, Promotion, Benefits, Welfare benefits, Compensation, Policy, workload, Performance, Job position, Work–life balance, Employee welfare, Wages, Promotion opportunity, Building, Female, Terms, Incentive, Image | ||
21 | Benefits | Welfare, Vacation, Welfare points, System, Full capacity, Annual leave, Card, Incentive, Event, Points, Organizational restructuring, Policy, Politics, Benefits, Team by Team, In-house café, Cost, Read the atmosphere, Birthday, Gift, Discount, Pressure to use annual leave, Medical check-up, Travel, Cash, In-house cafeteria, Purchase, Coupon, Subsidy, Quarter | ||
8 | Business and management | 15 | Business | Business, Stability, Growth, Investment, Operation, Future, Revenue, Culture, Change, Structure, Executives, Organization, Industry, Market, Size, Remuneration, Technology, Opportunity, System, Vision, Situation, Challenge, Work–life balance, Present, Profit, Effort, Developer, Environment, New, New business, Management |
17 | Management and operation | Executives, Board member, Business, Operation, President, Management, System, Resignation, Politics, Welfare, Mindset, Organization, Owner, Headcount, Size, Chairman, Promotion, Human resources, Vision, Business division, Monthly salary, Core, Performance, Organizational restructuring, Circle, Future, Interest, CEO, Salary, At the time | ||
9 | Unclassified | 6 | Miscellaneous | Resignation, Monthly salary, Representative, Executives, President, Mindset, Interview, Recruitment, Responsibility, Operation, Consumables, Revenue, Salary, Lie, Building, Surroundings, Team leader, Director, Explanation, Management, New employee, Retirement allowance, Personality, Disregard, Wages, Mistake, Recommended resignation, During the interview, Rating |
16 | Careers | New employee, Dispatch, Career, Annual salary, Experienced hire, Developer, Job transition, Resignation, Headcount, Interest, Years of experience, Site, Adaption, Operation, Experienced worker, Workplace, Employee, Competence, Treatment, Dispatch site, Sense of belonging, Monthly salary, Recruitment, New employee, Salary negotiation, Dispatch employee, Opportunity, Senior, Project assignment, Mentor, Task |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, J.; Lee, D.; Park, Y. Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Job Satisfaction Trends: A Text Mining Analysis of Employee Reviews Using the DMR Topic Model. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2912. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062912
Kim J, Lee D, Park Y. Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Job Satisfaction Trends: A Text Mining Analysis of Employee Reviews Using the DMR Topic Model. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(6):2912. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062912
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Jaeyun, Daeho Lee, and Yuri Park. 2025. "Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Job Satisfaction Trends: A Text Mining Analysis of Employee Reviews Using the DMR Topic Model" Applied Sciences 15, no. 6: 2912. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062912
APA StyleKim, J., Lee, D., & Park, Y. (2025). Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Job Satisfaction Trends: A Text Mining Analysis of Employee Reviews Using the DMR Topic Model. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 2912. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062912