Next Article in Journal
Toward Quieter Dental Devices: Transient CFD Simulation of Airflow and Noise in Air Turbine Handpieces
Previous Article in Journal
A Low-Cost Arduino-Based I–V Curve Tracer with Automated Load Switching for PV Panel Characterization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-O-Gallate on Bone Health

by
Patrycja Wróbel
1,
Beata Czarczynska-Goslinska
2,
Kyrylo Chornovolenko
1,3,
Julia Liwarska
3,4,
Jakub Kubiak
1,
Tomasz Koczorowski
1,
Agnieszka Malinska
5,
Tomasz Goslinski
1,* and
Magdalena Waszyk-Nowaczyk
4,*
1
Chair and Department of Chemical Technology of Drugs, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 3, 60-806 Poznań, Poland
2
Chair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 3, 60-806 Poznań, Poland
3
Doctoral School, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Bukowska 70, 60-812 Poznań, Poland
4
Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Care Division, Chair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 3, 60-806 Poznań, Poland
5
Chair and Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Święcickiego 6, 60-781 Poznań, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(15), 8182; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158182
Submission received: 11 May 2025 / Revised: 22 June 2025 / Accepted: 30 June 2025 / Published: 23 July 2025

Abstract

Tea is one of the most consumed beverages in the world, belonging to the category of compounds known as tannins and flavonoids. One of the polyphenols found in large amounts in green tea leaves (Camellia sinensis) is epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (EGCG). Though EGCG has shown some pharmacological effects, to date, it has not been utilised as a therapeutic agent. This is attributed to the fact that EGCG lacks adequate stability, and it is known to degrade through epimerization or auto-oxidation processes, especially when it is exposed to light, temperature fluctuations, some pH values, or the presence of oxygen. Consuming green tea with EGCG can alleviate the effects of bone diseases, such as osteoporosis, and support faster bone regeneration in the case of fractures. Therefore, this review focuses on the current state of research, highlighting the effects of EGCG on bone biology, such as enhancing osteoblast differentiation, promoting bone mineralisation, improving bone microarchitecture, and inhibiting osteoclastogenesis through the modulation of the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway. Additionally, EGCG exerts antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and dose-dependent effects on bone cells. It also downregulates inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-1β, and COX-2) and reduces oxidative stress via the inhibition of reactive oxygen species generation and the activation of protective signalling pathways (e.g., MAPK and NF-κB). Studies in animal models confirm that EGCG supplementation leads to increased bone mass and strength. These findings collectively support the further exploration of EGCG as an adjunct in the treatment and prevention of metabolic bone diseases. The authors aim to present the relationship between EGCG and bone health, highlighting issues for future research and clinical applications.

1. Introduction

Whilst green tea (Camellia sinensis) contains various classes of chemical compounds, such as catechins, phenolic acids, polyphenolic acids, amino acids, proteins, and lipids, in this paper, we will focus on catechins as represented by flavonoids. This is significant because the following catechins are all found in green tea: epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), epicatechin gallate (ECG), epigallocatechin (EGC), and epicatechin (EC). This fact makes green tea much richer in catechins than black tea (one cup of brewed green tea contains about 200–300 mg of EGCG, whereas black tea contains only about 18 mg per cup), and subsequently, its antioxidant capacity is directly proportional to the catechin content [1,2,3,4,5]. The number and proportion of active compounds depend on various factors related to the conditions of cultivation, including soil, climate, light, geography, microorganisms, and temperature. During black tea processing, fermentation takes place, and most catechins present in fresh green tea leaves undergo oxidation to theaflavins. These substances are the origin of the characteristic features of black tea—its dark colour and astringent taste [6].
EGCG, the major catechin with a polyphenolic structure, which was first isolated from green tea, has become a popular subject of research due to its intriguing properties [7]. The number of studies on this compound has proportionally begun to increase since the early 2000s. EGCG can be found in other plants such as Camellia gymnogyna (Baiyacha), a wild tea plant species closely related to C. sinensis. Research has shown that Baiyacha contains high levels of methylated EGCG derivatives, such as 3″-methyl-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG3″Me), which are rarely observed in regular tea plants [8]. While Camellia sinensis is by far the richest and most studied source, trace amounts of EGCG or structurally related galloylated catechins have been detected in the leaves, skins, or seeds of some fruits (e.g., apples, plums, blackberries, cranberries), nuts (hazelnuts and pecans), and other plants (onions), but these levels are generally much lower [9]. EGCG has the ability to quench reactive radicals and chelate transition metal ions, avoiding the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [7]. Its varied therapeutic properties have made it a popular bioactive ingredient and drug carrier in novel formulations. Due to its antioxidant, antivirus, and anti-inflammatory effects, it seems to be a promising compound for potential use in the treatment of many diseases [2,3,8,9]. Interestingly, epigallocatechin-3-gallate has been found to influence neuroprotection, including relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis [10,11,12,13,14]. However, EGCG exhibits several limitations, such as poor solubility in lipids, low bioavailability, rapid decomposition and a short half-life. In order to overcome these limitations, it would be necessary to either use its highly effective dose in vivo to get the expected pharmacological effect and/or modify the EGCG structure. As far as structural modification is concerned, Liu et al., in their study, presented its impact on the properties of EGCG derivatives. Changes in the chemical structure contributed to improved stability, uptake by tumour cells, solubility in lipids, and the ability to penetrate cells [14].
EGCG can effectively neutralise ROS and, therefore, prevent oxidative damage in healthy cells. It reveals chemopreventive properties as it contributes to apoptosis and stops cancer cells from growing. These effects are mediated by the modulation of cell cycle regulatory proteins, the activation of killer caspases, and the suppression of oncogenic transcription and pluripotency maintenance factors. EGCG has demonstrated its ability to affect many signal transduction pathways and block telomerase activity, causing the stimulation of telomere fragmentation. Clinical studies indicate that EGCG consumption reduces tumour incidence and multiplicity in the liver, stomach, skin, lung, mammary gland, and colon [2,3]. EGCG is also considered a potential therapeutic agent able to prevent the carcinogenesis of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) that most often precede the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. EGCG may block the progression of cancer by disrupting the cell cycle and precancerous lesions of the oral cavity [13].
EGCG also exhibits neuroprotective abilities, as it is assumed to diffuse and localise in the brain. Additionally, EGCG shows potential for the prevention of Alzheimer′s disease to reduce the amino acid form of β-amyloid Aβ and Τ (tau) protein toxicity and inhibit apoptosis. Moreover, ECGG may be a promising natural neuroprotective agent for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease by reducing and preventing dopamine loss as well as inhibiting oxidative stress [15]. In addition, EGCG seems to be a promising therapeutic for reducing neuroinflammation and preventing nerve damage after intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Bao et al. 2023 [16] investigated the effects of EGCG pretreatment on neuroinflammation-mediated neuronal pyroptosis in experimental ICH in mice. They observed the alleviation of microglial pyroptosis and neuroinflammation and an improvement in neurological function [16]. EGCG has also been reported to inhibit high glucose-induced senescence in H9C2 cardiomyocytes, as well as inflammation, and oxidative stress response and to trigger peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent signalling pathways, thereby preventing diabetic cardiomyopathy [17].
The advantageous effects of EGCG on bone condition have been widely researched [1,11]. Based on the results of many studies, EGCG has been shown to play a significant regulatory role in the immune response in osteoporosis, fracture healing, and periodontitis [18,19,20]. Moreover, green tea phytochemicals were found to improve various bone loss models associated with ageing, estrogen deficiency, and chronic inflammation [21,22]. The regular consumption of green tea is associated with improved bone health. Although a higher bone mineral density (BMD) and a lower hip fracture rate are associated with a higher consumption of green tea, the relationship remains unclear [18,23]. EGCG can suppress receptors for advanced glycation end product (RAGE) expression by epigenetic regulation, which leads to chondrocyte protection against osteoarthritis [24]. Interestingly, EGCG, as a substance capable of regulating bone metabolism, also affects periodontal remodelling during orthodontics, which was studied by Zou et al. [25]. In a study on rats, it reduced orthodontic tooth movement and orthodontic-induced root resorption. Furthermore, EGCG impaired osteoclastogenesis on the pressure side and promoted osteogenesis on the tension side. Summarising, EGCG is a non-toxic, naturally occurring compound with diverse and promising biological properties and a diversity of beneficial health effects, which is worth discussing in more detail.
Considering the aforementioned properties of EGCG, this review explores the current state of research, emphasising its effects on bone density, mineralisation, and the regulation of bone metabolism, from two perspectives: functional and biochemical effects. It aims to clarify the connection between EGCG and bone health, while highlighting key areas for future research and potential clinical applications.
The literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed and Google Scholar. Searches were carried out using combinations of the following keywords: “epigallocatechin-3-gallate”, “EGCG”, “green tea polyphenols”, “bone health”, “bone metabolism”, “osteoblast”, “osteoclast”, “osteoporosis”, “bone regeneration”, and “bone density”. The authors have included scientific publications from 1 January 1985 to 30 March 2025. In the first stage of the review, the titles of the articles were carefully checked. If the title clearly indicated that the article was outside the scope of our review, the reference was rejected. If the title suggested the presence of data consistent with our interests, the publication was subject to further analysis. In the next step, the abstracts were assessed and, if still possible, the full texts were analysed. Following an initial screening of titles and abstracts, the full texts of potentially relevant studies were reviewed for eligibility. A total of 162 articles met all inclusion criteria and were included in the final review.

2. Functional Effects of EGCG

EGCG can exert various functional effects as illustrated in Figure 1. Most of these are positive, although a few adverse ones have also been reported. EGCG supplementation has been demonstrated to influence various aspects of bone formation and maintenance in both in vitro and animal trials. One of its positives is the upregulation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), which stimulates bone mineralisation [26]. Additionally, EGCG has been shown to modulate osteoblast function by selectively inhibiting the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK; p42/p44) branch of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, thereby reducing PGD2-induced HSP27 expression in osteoblasts. This process may influence cellular stress responses rather than directly promote osteoblast proliferation or differentiation [27]. EGCG has also shown the potential to induce bone regeneration through mechanisms such as enhancing bone callus formation and by modulating the collagen membrane structure and function [21]. However, in certain cases, EGCG supplementation may require co-administration with α-calcium triphosphate to effectively promote the regeneration [28]. Furthermore, the concentration levels of EGCG play a crucial role in how effective it is. High dosages of EGCG can inhibit the proliferation of mesenchymal cells involved in osteogenesis in periodontitis, while intermediate concentrations can promote it. It has been shown that an intermediate dose of 4 and 6 µM promotes human periodontal ligament cell (hPDLC) osteogenesis by increasing ALP activity and the mRNA and protein expression levels of the osteogenic markers type I collagen (COL1), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), osteopontin (OPN), and Osterix (OSX). Specifically, quantitative real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that EGCG treatment significantly upregulated the mRNA levels of COL1, RUNX2, OPN, and OSX, indicating enhanced osteogenic differentiation at these concentrations [29]. Yet another study proved that the therapeutic effects of EGCG are dose-dependent. Mah et al. conducted research in which immunodeficient mice were transplanted in vivo with human alveolar bone-derived cells (hABCs) that had been pretreated with 10 µM of EGCG and mixed with calcium phosphate carrier combined with EGCG (0.1, 0.5, or 1.5 mg) [30]. The results indicated that EGCG up to 10 µM slightly increased osteogenic differentiation, while at higher concentrations above 25 µM, the proliferation and migration of hABCs were reduced. Hard tissue formation efficiency was enhanced when the low concentration in the 0.1 mg EGCG group was used, whereas EGCG levels exceeding 0.5 mg significantly reduced hard tissue formation.
In some instances, such as human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs) and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), additional osteoinductive agents or mechanical stretching were found to induce this effect by increasing the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and accelerating osteogenic differentiation, respectively [31,32]. Notably, EGCG prevents the TNF-α-mediated inhibition of osteogenic differentiation in hBM-MSCs while concurrently modulating osteoimmunological pathways. It suppresses TNF-α-induced IL-6 synthesis in osteoblasts via the attenuation of p44/p42 MAP kinase and stress-activated protein kinases/Jun amino-terminal kinases (SAPK/JNK) pathways, thereby reducing RANKL expression and shifting the RANKL/OPG balance towards bone formation [33]. EGCG does not solely impact tissue formation but contributes to improving bone microarchitecture and preventing bone loss [34,35]. Nakagawa et al. proved that this molecule hampers bone resorption by inducing apoptosis in osteoclast cells [36]. Interestingly, one study suggested that bone resorption might be stopped by the combined actions of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, without involving apoptosis [37]. Additionally, EGCG inhibits osteoclastogenesis through multiple pathways, notably by downregulating key osteoclastogenic transcription factors, such as c-Fos and the nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1), and by suppressing RANKL-induced JNK and NF-κB signalling, thereby mitigating bone resorption. Moreover, EGCG treatment decreases osteoclast formation by suppressing key osteoclastogenic factors, downregulating c-Fos and NFATc1 expression, and inhibiting JNK and NF-κB signalling in preosteoclasts, thus directly reducing osteoclastogenesis [32,33,34,38]. These processes that impact bone homeostasis are also dependent on dosage, particularly during the early stages of osteoclastogenesis [35,38]. Osteoblast migration plays a key role both in the physiological bone metabolism and in pathological bone processes. Research performed on cloned osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells derived from a newborn mouse by Kawabata et al. [39] showed that the compound inhibited insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I)-induced osteoblast migration by attenuating IGF-I-induced p44/p42 MAP kinase phosphorylation.
The effects described above were researched using various cell lines, whose characteristics and relevance to physiological processes are outlined below. Human mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs) are the most relevant model in the context of human physiology, as they are directly derived from humans and reflect the properties of human stem cells [26,31,32,33,39,40,41]. The MC3T3-E1 line, although widely used in the in vitro studies of osteoblasts, originates from mice and does not fully replicate the processes occurring in human bone tissue [27,32,34,42,43]. Similarly, the RAW264.7 line, a murine model of macrophages and osteoclasts, is valuable for studying bone remodelling; however, interspecies differences limit the direct translation of findings to human physiology [23,43,44,45,46,47]. In summary, hBM-MSCs appear to provide the most physiologically relevant model for human studies. The MC3T3-E1 and RAW264.7 cell lines remain useful for fundamental and mechanistic research, but their applicability to directly model human physiological processes is limited.

2.1. Stimulating Mineralisation and Enhancement of Bone Formation

One of the main effects influencing bone structure is the stimulation of bone metabolism, leading to the enhancement of mineralisation. Chen et al. [26] demonstrated in their study on the D1 cell line (a murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell line) that the administration of EGCG at a dose of 1 or 10 µmol/L promotes mineralisation by increasing the osteogenic gene expressions and upregulation of ALP activity. In another study, Vali et al. observed that treatment with 1–5 µM of EGCG in SaOS-2 cells (human osteoblast (HOB)-like cells) led to an increased formation of mineralised bone nodules by enhancing osteoblast differentiation, along with a decrease in RUNX2 protein levels [48].
The improvement in bone structure and the enhancement of bone formation following EGCG supplementation have also been observed in various studies. Yamauchi et al. demonstrated that it can modulate osteoblast cell function towards bone formation by inhibiting p44/p42 MAP kinase in cloned osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells derived from newborn mouse calvaria [27]. Various bone defects and fractures can be alleviated by this compound. Rodriguez et al. observed in parietal bone rats that the combination of EGCG and α-calcium triphosphate (whose derivative is hydroxyapatite, responsible for mechanical bone strength) reduced bone defects by inducing maximum bone regeneration [28]. EGCG itself enhanced the healing of bone defects by de novo bone formation, as noted by Lin et al. [44]. One of the possibilities of facilitating the healing of bone fractures by EGCG may be its influence on enhancing bone callus formation. The study performed by Lin et al. on the right tibial bones of rats indicated that it acts by increasing the expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2), which subsequently enhances the bone mechanical properties [21]. Chu et al. demonstrated in the in vivo study on the dorsal part of the rat cranium that EGCG can also be used to modify collagen membranes, which in turn induces bone formation [45]. They indicated that an increase in the number of macrophages (M2) promoted the secretion of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and BMP-2 and upregulated the expression of RUNX-2 and osteopontin (OPN) after implantation of the EGCG-modified collagen membranes. EGCG was also found to be an anti-angiogenic agent. The study performed by Takita et al. on rats indicated the reduction in the activity of ALP and calcium content, accompanied by an increase in the content of type II collagen, which enables the simultaneous inhibition of ectopic osteogenesis and the enhancement of chondrogenesis [49].

2.2. Prevention/Alleviation of Bone Loss and Inhibition of Bone Resorption

The preservation of proper bone structure can occur through several mechanisms beyond the promotion of osteogenic differentiation or mineralisation processes. Hayashi et al. [34] showed that EGCG can prevent bone loss due to the suppression of the SAPK/JNK pathway in cloned osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells derived from newborn mouse calvaria. In contrast, Chen et al. [35] proved that EGCG treatment ameliorates bone loss and improves bone microarchitecture by enhancing osteogenesis after BMP-2 expression in the in vivo study conducted on ovariectomy-induced osteopenic rats (their proximal tibia and third lumbar spine were compared).
The main cell population responsible for bone resorption is the osteoclast. Under physiological conditions, they maintain the proper mechanical strength of bones. Sometimes, under the influence of various factors, a pathological increase in bone resorption may occur. This can be prevented, for example, by inducing osteoclast death, thereby preventing/reducing bone resorption. Nakagawa et al. [36] found that EGCG treatment leads to the inhibition of bone resorption by inducing the apoptotic death of crude murine osteoclast-like multinucleated cells (OCLs), which involves the Fenton reaction affecting caspase-3 activity. Also, Yun et al. [46] noted an apoptotic osteoclast cell death in the murine monocyte/macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7-cell-derived osteoclasts treated with EGCG. This process was caused by DNA fragmentation and caspase-3 activation. On the other hand, Yun et al. [37] showed that the expression of matrix metalloproteinases-9 (Mmp-9) genes derived from primary osteoblastic mouse cells stimulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis could be inhibited by EGCG. This study suggested that bone resorption may be inhibited not only through the induction of osteoclast apoptosis but also by modulating osteoblast–osteoclast signalling pathways.

2.3. Inhibition of Osteoclastogenesis and Osteoclast Differentiation

According to conclusions drawn from studies by Lee et al. [50] on mouse bone marrow cells, EGCG inhibited osteoclast differentiation from bone marrow cells and primary osteoblast co-cultures induced by IL-1, TNF-α, and vitamin D3 plus PGE2 by reducing c-Fos and the nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 NFATc1 expression, thereby inhibiting the RANKL-induced activation of the NF-κB and JNK/c-Jun signalling pathways. Several years later, Xu et al. [47] came to a similar conclusion that RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and F-actin ring formation were inhibited by EGCG through the downregulation of NFATc1 and c-Fos in mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. They also found that the derivative of EGCG exerted a stronger effect than the parent molecule. The effects of RANKL are reversed by osteoprotegerin (OPG). Chen et al. [19] showed that the co-culture of RAW 264.7 cells and the feeder cells ST2 treatment with EGCG resulted in an increase in OPG mRNA expression and a decrease in RANKL mRNA expression, and therefore, the RANKL/OPG ratio decreased. Moreover, a decrease in osteoclastogenesis by TRAP-positive (tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase) osteoclasts and TRAP activity, was noted.
Osteoclast differentiation is physiologically stimulated by, among others, osteoblasts. The inhibition of this process may cause a reduction in the number of osteoclasts. Kamon et al. [38] reached this conclusion after observing that EGCG decreased ALP activity and suppressed the mRNA expression of ALP and osteocalcin (OCN) in MC3T3-E1 cells, as well as in the co-cultures of osteoblasts from neonatal mouse calvaria and bone marrow cells. The treatment of pluripotent mesenchymal cells D1 with EGCG increased OPG expression and thus inhibited osteoclast differentiation and activity. Such conclusions were made by Chen et al. [26,42]. Several years later, Fujita et al. [43], using cloned osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells derived from newborn mouse calvaria, showed an inhibition of osteoclast differentiation and activation by increasing OPG release and the levels of OPG mRNA expression. Many factors can influence the conversion of monocytes to osteoclasts. One of them is NFATc1. Morinobu et al. [51] showed in the antibody-induced arthritis model of male mice that NFATc1 expression was limited by EGCG, which prevented the CD14+ monocytes from converting to osteoclasts. Simultaneously, catechin did not affect the expression of NF-κB, c-Fos, and c-Jun. In turn, Lin et al. observed on RAW 264.7 (a murine preosteoclast cell line) that osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption activity at an early stage of osteoclastogenesis were inhibited by EGCG in a dose-dependent manner through its effects on NF-κB-mediated transactivation and RANKL signalling via intranuclear NF-κB translocation [52]. In contrast, Oka et al. found in rat osteoclast precursor cells and mature osteoclasts that EGCG had an inhibitory effect on osteoclast formation and differentiation by inhibiting the enzymatic activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and the levels of MMP-9 mRNA in osteoclast precursor cells [53].
Major conclusions are as follows:
  • EGCG influences bone health by upregulating alkaline phosphatase to stimulate bone mineralisation [26].
  • It modulates osteoblast function through MAP kinase inhibition, contributing to bone tissue formation [27].
  • It can potentially induce bone regeneration by enhancing bone callus formation and modifying collagen membranes [21,45].
  • Concentration matters: high EGCG dosages inhibit mesenchymal cell proliferation in osteogenesis, while intermediate concentrations promote it [29].
  • It also prevents the inhibition of osteogenic differentiation by affecting TNF-α, and it has various effects on bone microarchitecture and osteoclasts [33,34,35,36,37].

3. Biochemical Effects of EGCG

The effects of EGCG on various biochemical pathways and potential pharmacological effects are summarised in Figure 2.
EGCG administration led to a reduction in osteoclast differentiation and activation, achieved through an increased expression of OPG mRNA [19] and the inhibition of RANKL production [54]. Additionally, it showed a greater ability to enhance OPG mRNA expression in pluripotent stem cells compared to other green tea catechins [42,43]. Numerous in vitro studies demonstrated that its supplementation was capable of suppressing RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis [44,47,50]. As mentioned previously, another crucial factor in physiological bone growth is ALP, which could be significantly activated by it. This effect was attributed to the upregulation of Runx2 gene expression and the inhibition of acid phosphatase mRNA expression [26,29,33,40,41,55]. Runx2, a key gene involved in osteoblast differentiation, was efficiently activated by it at low concentrations (typically up to 5 µM) [29,33,40,41]. Furthermore, in vitro studies showed that EGCG could overexpress other genes related to bone development, such as Osx and Bmp-2, at concentrations of up to 10 µM [26,29,31,32,33,35,40,41].
The compound also promoted the synthesis of VEGF [34,56], stimulating bone growth by influencing the SAPK/JNK pathway and reducing interleukin 6 (IL-6) synthesis, which is responsible for bone resorption [54,57,58,59]. EGCG was not only implicated in osteogenesis processes but also in the treatment of bone-related neoplasms, such as chondrosarcoma, through the activation of caspase-3 [60]. Finally, it affected MAP kinases involved in the regulation of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, either attenuating or inhibiting their activity [27,39,57,58]. It was also demonstrated that it could impede bone resorption by inducing a Fenton-type reaction, leading to the production of radicals that trigger osteoclast apoptosis [36]. Conversely, EGCG protected the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by mitigating hydrogen peroxide-related adverse effects [40].

3.1. RANK/RANKL/OPG Path Regulation

RANKL, the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK), and OPG belong to the TNFs and their receptor superfamilies. As a TNF superfamily molecule, RANKL forms a homotrimer and binds to its receptors. RANK and OPG act as monomers and homodimers, respectively. The RANKL/RANK/OPG is a crucial system for bone resorption [61]. RANK/RANKL/OPG form the essential cytokine system that is capable of regulating all ranges of osteoclast functions (proliferation, differentiation, fusion, activation, and apoptosis). The balance in bone resorption depends on the local ratio of RANKL to OPG [62]. The central regulation of osteoclast proliferation and differentiation is controlled by OPG, RANKL, and the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) [63]. RANK is found in osteoclasts and their precursors. RANKL is produced in both soluble and membrane-bound forms by osteoblasts and stromal cells in the bone marrow and has a pivotal role in osteoclastogenesis, differentiation, activation, and the apoptosis of osteoclasts. OPG is a soluble product of stromal cells and osteoblasts, and it plays the role of a decoy receptor of the RANK ligand. The function of OPG is to block the RANK-RANKL interactions, which are required for the differentiation and activation of osteoclasts [64,65].
The inhibition of the RANKL–RANK signalling pathway in bone can increase bone mass by preventing osteoclastic bone resorption [66]. The activities of RANKL are mediated by its binding to RANK. The interaction between RANKL and RANK is the preliminary key step in the osteoclastogenesis pathway. The inhibition of RANKL binding with RANK by OPG can therefore suppress bone resorption and favour bone formation [65,67]. The connection of RANKL to RANK is followed by the recruitment of the TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF). Although several of these proteins (TRAFs 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6) are involved in the RANK signalling pathway, TRAF-6 seems to be the crucial protein for RANKL signalling in osteoclasts [61,65,68]. TRAF proteins are believed to serve as second messengers that activate multiple downstream signalling pathways, including those involving transcription factors like NF-κB and c-Jun. When activated, NF-κB increases the expression of c-Fos [69,70], which subsequently combines with the NFAT-c1 to stimulate the transcription of genes involved in osteoclast activity [65]. The RANKL/RANK/OPG system, therefore, acts as a common final pathway for several cytokines and hormonal factors involved in bone resorption [61,65].
The inhibition of RANKL synthesis caused by EGCG treatment was also noted by Ishida et al. [54] on NRG cells (a mouse marrow-derived fibroblast-like cell line with osteoblast-like characteristics) and was accompanied by a reduction in the production of IL-6, which resulted in the inhibition of inflammation in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Green tea catechins (EC, EGC, ECG, EGCG) can enhance the expression of OPG mRNA in pluripotent mesenchymal cells, but of these, EGCG has the strongest effect, which leads to the inhibition of osteoclast differentiation and activity [42]. OPG production is stimulated by bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) [71]. By controlling this protein expression in osteoblasts, Fujita et al. [43] examined the effects of EGCG and coffee polyphenol chlorogenic acid (CGA) on OPG synthesis in cloned osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells derived from newborn mouse calvaria. The findings demonstrated that EGCG considerably inhibits osteoclast differentiation and activation through increasing the release of OPG triggered by BMP-4, whereas CGA has no discernible impact. Lin et al. in their study performed on RAW 264.7 indicated that by preventing RANKL-mediated NF-κB transcriptional activity and the nuclear transport of NF-κB, the inhibition of RANKL-induced differentiation of osteoclasts and the formation of resorption pits in RAW 264.7 cells and primary bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) were observed [52]. In another study, the inhibition of the JNK/c-Jun and NF-κB pathways by EGCG in mouse BMMs obtained from the femurs and tibias of 5-week-old ICR mice led to the inhibition of RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation and an induction of c-Fos and NFATc1 [50]. Another mechanism of the inhibition of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and the formation of F-actin rings was related to downregulating NFATc1 and c-Fos by EGCG in mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells [47].

3.2. Increasing Alkaline Phosphatase Activity

ALP is a metalloenzyme that plays a crucial role in the formation of hard tissue and serves as one of the bone maturation markers [72,73]. The form of phosphatase that acts within bone tissue is the liver/bone/kidney isoenzyme, also known as tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP) [72,74,75]. ALP increases the local concentrations of inorganic phosphate, promoting mineralisation while simultaneously reducing the extracellular levels of pyrophosphate, a known inhibitor of mineral formation [72]. Signalling pathways such as the wingless-related integration site (Wnt), BMP-2, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and IGFBP/IGF have been reported to control ALP expression. In particular, the Wnt-dependent activation of RUNX2 and LEF1/TCF transcription factors enhances ALP expression. The elevated serum ALP activity occurs during physiological bone growth. The activation of BMP-BMPR-Smads and/or FGF-FGFR-MAPK signalling increases ALP expression and osteoblast differentiation. IGFs are powerful ligands that activate the PI3K/Akt pathway to promote ALP expression and osteoblast differentiation [76]. The additional control of ALP expression is exerted through the actions of 1,25-(OH)2-vitamin D, retinoic acid, and parathormone [73]. ALP activity is detectable in the osteoid areas of new bone formation but not in the calcified bone matrix [77]. This is because ALP acts in the initial phase of cartilage calcification [73]. ALP plays a role in the hydrolysis of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi) to produce inorganic phosphate (Pi). The ratio between the levels of PPi and Pi is important for bone mineralisation [72,73,75].
In many in vitro studies, the influence of EGCG on ALP activity has been discussed (Table 1). In the majority of them, the increased expression of osteogenic proteins was observed and was accompanied by stimulating mineralisation, osteogenesis promotion, and the enhancement of osteogenic differentiation.

3.3. Effects on RUNX2 Protein Level

Runx2, a member of the runt-domain gene family, regulates the differentiation of osteoblasts from multipotent mesenchymal stem cells [48] and plays a fundamental role in osteoblast maturation and homeostasis [78,79,80,81]. RUNX2 enhances osteoblast differentiation at an early stage but suppresses osteoblast maturation at late stages [82]. The RUNX2 transcription factor operates by binding to the osteoblast-specific cis-acting element 2 (Ose2), located in the promoter region of all major osteoblast-related genes, where it regulates their expression. Its level and/or activity are dictated by a number of different external cues, while multiple signalling pathways that affect osteoblast function merge to and are integrated by RUNX2 [78]. The ectopic expression of RUNX2 in mesenchymal cell lines leads to the upregulation of osteoblast-specific genes like Ocn, Alp, collagenase-3 (Col3), matrix metalloproteinase-13 (Mmp-13), bone sialoprotein, and collagen type Iα1 [78,83]. The Type I isoform of RUNX2 seems to be mainly involved in the intramembranous bone formation, while the Type II isoform has an exclusive role in the endochondral bone formation [84]. During the intramembranous bone formation, the Type I isoform is widely expressed in osteoprogenitor cells and in active osteoblasts, whereas the Type II isoform expression is stringently restricted to cells lining mineralised bones [84]. RUNX2 also plays a crucial role in chondrocyte maturation by the direct regulation of Indian Hedgehog (Ihh) expression. Ihh is a signalling molecule that regulates cartilage development and bone growth. RUNX2 induces the expression of Sp7 (specificity protein 7). Sp7 (also known as Osterix) is a transcription factor essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Additionally, the cooperation among RUNX2, Sp7, and canonical Wnt signalling, a pathway important for cell proliferation and differentiation, is essential for the differentiation of preosteoblasts into immature osteoblasts [80,81]. It also induces the proliferation of osteoprogenitors by the direct regulation of fibroblast growth factor receptors like FGFR-2 and FGFR-3 expression. These receptors are involved in signalling pathways that influence the proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells [80].
In many in vitro studies, the influence of EGCG on RUNX2 protein expression was extensively examined, revealing variable outcomes depending on the cell type and experimental conditions (Table 2). In SaOS-2 cells, EGCG enhanced osteoblast differentiation and mineralised nodule formation, despite a reduction in RUNX2 protein levels [48], suggesting a RUNX2-independent mechanism of osteogenesis in this context. In contrast, most studies reported an upregulation of RUNX2 expression following EGCG treatment. For example, in hBM-MSCs, EGCG increased RUNX2 and OSX expression while preventing the TNFα-induced suppression of osteogenic differentiation [33]. In hBM-MSCs, EGCG reversed H2O2-induced damage and promoted Runx2 gene expression along with other osteogenic markers such as ALP, OSX, β-catenin, and cyclin D1 [40]. Similarly, in hMSCs, RUNX2 expression was elevated alongside BMP-2 and VEGF, contributing to enhanced osteogenic differentiation [32]. EGCG also upregulated Runx2 and other osteogenic genes in hBM-MSCs [41] and hPDLCs [29], further supporting its role in activating RUNX2-driven pathways.

3.4. Increasing Expression of the Osterix

OSX is an osteoblast-specific transcription factor required for bone formation [85,86,87,88]. It activates a repertoire of genes during the differentiation of preosteoblasts into mature osteoblasts and osteocytes and decreases osteoblast proliferation [85]. There are two main pathways through which Osx gene expression is induced: directly or indirectly [89]. RUNX2 plays a key role during bone development by directly initiating the expression of other osteogenic genes, such as Alp and Col1 in the early stage and Opn and Osx in the later stage [90]. For the RUNX2-dependent pathway, OSX inhibits chondrocyte differentiation in RUNX2-expressing precursor osteoblasts. RUNX2 expression is initially detected in prechondrogenic mesenchymal cells. As development progresses, OSX expression is induced, leading to the differentiation of RUNX2-positive cells into osteoblast precursors [86,87]. In both membranous and endochondral skeletons, OSX-null preosteoblasts are unable to differentiate into osteoblasts, which means that without OSX, mature osteoblasts are not formed [85]. Moreover, OSX inhibits the Wnt pathway [85,87]—a RUNX2-independent pathway. The Wnt pathway modulates bone formation through the control of progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation [87].
The influence of EGCG on the expression of OSX was examined in many in vitro studies, with consistently positive effects observed across various cell types (Table 3). In D1 murine mesenchymal stem cells, EGCG enhanced osteogenic differentiation by upregulating osteogenic gene expression, which included increased OSX levels [26]. In hPDLCs, EGCG significantly elevated both the mRNA and protein expression of OSX, indicating its direct role in promoting osteogenesis [29]. Similarly, in hBM-MSCs, low concentrations of EGCG stimulated OSX expression while protecting against the TNFα-induced inhibition of osteogenic differentiation [33]. In hBM-MSCs, EGCG reversed oxidative damage induced by H2O2, leading to a marked increase in OSX expression and enhanced mineralization capacity [40].
The most important class of biomolecules in bone regeneration is the BMP [91]. These proteins can regulate the function and differentiation of cells involved in bone formation and healing [92,93,94]. BMP-2 is an exceptionally potent growth factor that acts as a chemoattractant for mesenchymal stromal cells, rapidly inducing their differentiation into osteoblasts while also supporting their viability. BMP-2 is the most potent molecule in osteoinduction, essential for new bone formation [91]. The differentiation of mesenchymal cells into osteoblast precursors is induced by BMP-2 and has a beneficial effect on osteoblast maturation by increasing the expression of RUNX2 and osteoblast marker genes [95]. Xiong et al. [92] reported that besides inducing bone growth, BMP-2 and other BMPs stimulated the increase of VEGF in the bone formation process. During skeletal development, BMPs and Wnts have been implicated in the specification of osteo/chondro progenitors and remain involved in each of the subsequent stages of endochondral ossification through the regulation of RUNX2 and OSX expression [93]. BMPs can activate RUNX2, and BMP-2 has been shown to activate OSX in RUNX2 mutant cells, but whether this is direct or mediated through β-catenin is not certain [93,96]. Another possible mechanism by which BMP-2 may act is through the levels of Smad1, a BMP-specific transcription factor. In Xenopus embryos, the binding of BMP to the BMP receptor complex triggers three sequential phosphorylations in Smad1 that control the timing of the BMP signal [97]. BMP activity has also been shown to initiate transcription factor Sox9 expression as cell condensation takes place during embryonic skeletogenesis [93,94,98]. What is more, BMP-2 induces the synthesis of OPG in human osteoblasts [99].
Takita et al. studied whether the inhibition of angiogenesis enhances chondrogenesis and inhibits osteogenesis using EGCG [49]. Bone morphogenetic protein-induced osteo- and chondrogenesis was chosen as the experimental system to elucidate the biochemical mechanism of bone formation. In the study, a fibrous glass membrane (FGM) was used as a BMP carrier, mixed with 1.2 µg of rhBMP-2 and 1 or 10 µg of EGCG, and subcutaneously implanted in rats. The results showed that its supplementation increases cartilage formation and reduces bone formation. The FGM, coupled with BMP and implanted subcutaneously in rats, produced only cartilage in the membrane after 1 and 2 weeks. Increasing the dose of EGCG resulted in a decrease in the activity of alkaline phosphatase and calcium content, while it increased the content of type II collagen [49].
In numerous studies, the effect of EGCG on the expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 has been investigated, consistently demonstrating its role in promoting osteogenesis (Table 4). In an in vivo model using ovariectomy-induced osteopenic rats, EGCG mitigated bone loss by improving bone microarchitecture parameters, including BMD and trabecular bone structure, while also upregulating BMP-2 synthesis in both the proximal tibia and lumbar spine [35]. In vitro, EGCG was shown to enhance BMP-2 expression in hBM-MSCs, particularly when combined with osteoinductive agents, thereby promoting osteogenic differentiation [31]. Similarly, in hMSCs, EGCG increased BMP-2 expression alongside RUNX2 and VEGF, contributing to accelerated osteogenic commitment [32]. Additional studies confirmed that EGCG upregulated BMP-2 mRNA levels in hBM-MSCs, along with markers such as RUNX2 and ALP, leading to enhanced mineralisation and osteogenic differentiation [41]. Furthermore, in a rat tibial fracture model, EGCG treatment increased BMP-2 expression and promoted callus formation, supporting its role in fracture healing [21].

3.5. Increasing the Level of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

The inactivation of VEGF completely inhibits the invasion of blood vessels with the simultaneous impairment of trabecular bone formation and the expansion of the hypertrophic chondrocyte zone in the mouse tibial epiphyseal growth plate [100]. Within the VEGF family of proteins, the following can be found: VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, and PIGF. These proteins are bound by the receptors VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. VEGFR1 is activated by VEGF-A, -B, and PIGF, while VEGFR2 is activated by VEGF-A, -C, and -D [101]. VEGF-A is one of the critical mediators of blood vessel invasion into the cartilaginous mould. During typical distraction osteogenesis, the expression of both VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 is induced [102,103]. Furthermore, blocking VEGF-A activity in the distraction gap through the antibody-mediated inhibition of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 significantly reduces bone formation and decreases the number of blood vessels [102,104]. Another hypothesis, termed the “spontaneous rupture theory”, was proposed by Pufe et al. [105]. According to them, VEGF increases MMP expression in endothelial cells and in tendon fibroblasts themselves. The invasion of vessels and the MMP expression lead to a weakening of the normal tendon structure, which further leads to a decrease in the mechanical strain and subsequently to the spontaneous rupture. However, Hu and Olsen [106] in their study came to a different conclusion. They found that the effects of extracellular VEGF are dose-dependent: high levels of VEGF inhibit regenerative cell infiltration and the osteoinduction of mesenchymal progenitor cells, resulting in reduced bone formation. The proper levels of VEGF produced by osteoblastic cells are crucial for the coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis during the healing of small bone defects. VEGF produced by osteoblasts is important for the early angiogenic response and the infiltration of macrophages during the initial phase of inflammation. In wound healing and tumour progression, macrophage infiltration occurs before angiogenesis, and VEGF acts as a chemotactic signal for macrophages and monocytes. This is why the proangiogenic effects of osteoblast-derived VEGF involve macrophages, in addition to directly targeting endothelial cells. Optimal amounts of VEGF are crucial for therapeutic outcomes. Not only a dose dependency but also a mechanism of delivery were noted by Rumney et al. [107].
In an in vitro study performed on cloned osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells derived from newborn mouse calvaria, it was shown that the enhancement of SAPK/JNK activation in osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells could lead to an increase in PGF2α-stimulated VEGF synthesis in osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells and thus regulate capillary endothelial cell proliferation [56]. In another study performed on hMSCs with EGCG combined with mechanical stretching, it was shown that increasing the expression of RUNX2, BMP-2, and VEGF leads to an acceleration of osteogenic differentiation [32]. In another in vivo study, it was presented that the implantation of EGCG-modified collagen membrane results in an increase in the number of macrophages (M2), promotes the secretion of VEGF and BMP-2, and increases the expression of RUNX-2 and OPN. It is interesting because the collagen membrane could be used in guided bone regeneration (GBR), acting as a barrier to prevent the migration of epithelial cells and connective tissue, as well as it could maintain space for bone regeneration, and promote important biological activities including cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and differentiation [45].

3.6. Inhibition of Interleukin-6 Synthesis

Cytokines are short-lived proteins with a low molecular mass of approximately 15–20 kDa and play crucial roles in autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine signalling. These molecules play a key role in the development and activity of the immune system. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) family cytokines are classified based on the common signalling receptor subunit glycoprotein 130 kDa (gp130). Currently, this class includes eight cytokines: IL-6, IL-11, ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), oncostatin M (OSM), cardiotrophin-like cytokine (CLC), cardiotrophin 1 (CT-1), and IL-27 [108]. These cytokines demonstrate unique cell-surface expression by interacting with the specific transmembrane IL-6 receptor (mIL-6R) or its soluble forms (sIL-6R) and the signal-transducing subunit molecule gp130 [109]. In the case of the treatment of different autoimmune diseases, suppressing the IL-6 family of cytokines becomes advantageous. Furthermore, recent advances in cytokine blocking have helped reduce adverse effects related to metabolic dysfunction and bacterial infections [108].
Regarding interleukin-6, the presence of both anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory activity is induced by different biological mechanisms and sources [110]. It is well known that interferon-β2 (IFN-β2), hepatocyte-stimulating factor, and hybridoma/plasmacytoma growth factor (also known as IL-6) are mainly produced by monocytes and macrophage cells [111]. Moreover, B and T cells, hepatocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, mesangial cells, adipocytes, and several tumour cells can produce IL-6 constitutively or after stimulation [109,110,112]. IL-6 plays a significant role in the proliferation and differentiation of cells in humans. Additionally, the immunopathogenic role of IL-6 in tumour development, metastasis, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and therapeutic resistance has been proven in recent publications [109,113,114,115]. It also exerts a significant physiological effect on a wide range of functions, such as promoting B cell differentiation [58]. When osteoblasts are affected by IL-1 or IL-6, the expression of RANKL, an osteoclast differentiation factor, is induced, resulting in bone resorption [116,117,118].
According to Kaur et al. [111], triggering the trans-signalling mechanism with IL-6 promotes various pathological pathways, including those that could contribute to multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, anaemia, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer. Among these routes are JAK/STAT3, Ras/MAPK, and PI3K–PKB/Akt, and the regulation of CD4+ T cells and VEGF levels. The research of Tanaka et al. [117] provided an example of tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor (IL-6R)-neutralising monoclonal antibody. It was approved in more than 100 countries for the treatment of autoimmune diseases induced by IL-6. Additionally, patients with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated that a blockade of IL-6 activity was observed to be at least as efficient as the blockade of the tumour necrosis factor [117]. Normally, an average person′s buffer of IL-6 in the blood is in the range of 1–5 pg/mL. The concentration of cytokines rapidly increases several thousand times during inflammatory states, and under lethal septic stages, it can even reach levels of several mg/mL. Soluble sIL-6R concentration usually stays within 40–75 ng/mL, and the levels of sgp130 reach approximately 250–400 ng/mL [108]. In NRG cells, suppressing the production of interleukin 6 and RANKL by EGCG led to the inhibition of inflammation in osteomyelitis treatment [54]. The reduction of IL-6 synthesis by EGCG on osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells is caused by different mechanisms, such as the attenuation of the p44/p42 MAP kinase pathway and/or p38 MAP kinase [58,59], as well as the inhibition of the PDGF-BB-induced phosphorylation of SAPK/JNK [57].

3.7. Induction of Caspase-3

Both programmed cell death mechanisms in the human body—apoptosis and pyroptosis (an inflammatory form of cell death)—are caspase-dependent pathways. Caspases are a family of cysteine-dependent proteases that are synthesised as inactive zymogens. They are activated by dimer formation (e.g., apoptotic initiator caspases-8, -9) or by cleavage (e.g., apoptotic effector caspase-3) [119]. Caspase-3 cleaves a series of substrates and activates an endonuclease, leading to DNA fragmentation that is the hallmark of apoptosis [120]. In their overview of caspases, Svandova et al. [121] state that these proteases play not only a key role in apoptosis and inflammation, but also are multifunctional enzymes with lethal and non-lethal functions. According to recent findings, caspases are localised subcellularly. These enzymes have to be transported into the nucleus for central caspase-3 to regulate the apoptotic disintegration of the nucleus. In fact, it was discovered that activated caspase-3 is localised in the nucleus of cells during apoptosis [122]. In the case of non-apoptotic processes, it is proposed that caspase activation is locally held in subcellular compartments, leading to the availability of specific substrates. Caspase-3 is typically localised in the cytoplasm of intact cells. Another method of non-apoptotic engagement could involve sub-lethal caspase activation. This may be related to a phenomenon known as mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP); specifically, a subtype referred to as “minority MOMP”. This effect supposes that a part of the cell mitochondria is permeable. Initially, the phenomenon was discovered to trigger apoptosis via rapid caspase activation. Minority MOMP reduced caspase activation, which is insufficient to trigger cell death [123]. Instead, this caspase activity damages DNA, resulting in increased genomic instability [121,124].
The therapeutic use of caspase-3 in the treatment of several illnesses, including cancer, heart failure, and neurological disorders, has significantly increased to date [125]. Zhang et al. [126], in the review article, provided follow-up data about the remarkable impact of caspase-3 ferment inhibition by EGCG due to the reduction of cell apoptosis and restoration of mitochondrial membrane potential. Therefore, EGCG could be useful for preventing cardiovascular diseases characterised by endothelial dysfunction [127], as well as neurological diseases and models with injuries in primary retinal pigment epithelial cells [128,129].
Chondrosarcoma is a malignant tumour of cartilage tissue. Islam et al. showed in an in vitro study that EGCG significantly reduced the viability of HTB-94 human chondrosarcoma cells by activating caspase-3/CPP32-like proteases and promoting apoptosis [60]. In another study performed on the murine monocyte/macrophage cell line, Raw 264.7, it was noted that DNA fragmentation and the induction of the activation of caspase-3 in RAW 264.7 cell-derived osteoclasts could lead to osteoclast apoptosis caused in part by caspase-3 and thus the prevention of alveolar bone resorption [46].

3.8. Influence on SAPK/JNK Pathway

The family of SAPKs plays a crucial role as intracellular signalling components to transduce the various signals of agonists [56]. SAPKs are induced by protein kinase cascades that have an association with sensors or receptors on the cell surface. This leads to the dual phosphorylation of SAPKs on adjacent tyrosine and threonine residues [130]. Meanwhile, c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) can be induced mainly by pro-inflammatory cytokines or exposure to environmental stress. The JNK subfamily consists of three kinase types: JNK1, JNK2, and JNK3. These three isoforms are encoded by the Jnk1, J2, and Jnk3 genes, respectively. The first two kinases are expressed in various tissues, whereas the third one is mainly found in the brain, heart, and testes [131].
In the human body, JNK regulates various cell processes such as cell differentiation, proliferation, survival, and metabolic reprogramming, best known for its role in programmed cell death [131,132,133]. According to Yung and Giacca, these kinases respond to various cellular stress signals triggered by cytokines, free fatty acids, as well as hyperglycaemia [134]. It also stands as a key mediator in the shift from obesity to type 2 diabetes. Various disorders in humans, such as neurological conditions like neurodegenerative disease, chronic inflammatory conditions (rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease), infectious disorders, and cancer, have connections with dysregulated JNK signalling [131].
Several studies on the influence of EGCG on the SAPK/JNK pathway were performed on cloned osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells derived from newborn mouse calvaria. Tokuda et al. noted that enhanced SAPK/JNK activation in osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells promoted PGF2α-stimulated VEGF synthesis by enhancing SAPK/JNK activation in osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells and thus regulating capillary endothelial cell proliferation [56]. Takai et al. studied the inhibition of the PDGF-BB-induced phosphorylation of SAPK/JNK and found that the inhibition of PDGF-BB stimulated IL-6 synthesis via the suppression of the SAPK/JNK pathway in osteoblasts [57]. Hayashi et al. noted that the reduction in the TGF-β-stimulated induction of HSP27 in osteoblasts prevents the suppression of bone loss [34].

3.9. Attenuation of p44/p42 MAP Kinase or p44/p42 MAP Kinase and p38 MAP Kinase

The main characteristic of enzymes named kinases involves the transference of the γ-phosphate from ATP to serine, threonine, or tyrosine amino acid residues of a downstream protein substrate, therefore ensuring a communication cascade that is fundamental to eukaryotic cells [135]. Generally, kinases are dually phosphorylated at serine and threonine residues and, consequently, named Ser/Thr kinases [133,136]. MAPKs constitute a group of serine/threonine protein kinases consisting of three major subfamilies: (i) ERK p42/p44 ERK, also known as p42/p44 MAPK; (ii) c-Jun N-terminal kinases; and (iii) p38 MAPKs. The p42/p44 MAPKs are mainly involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation, while the JNKs and p38 MAPKs are involved in apoptosis, inflammation, and responses to environmental stress [137]. Rehfeldt et al. [133] described numerous interconnections between the MAPK pathways, which can occasionally make it difficult to differentiate between them. For example, the JNK and p38 pathways are commonly linked to inflammation and cellular death and are both initiated by cytokines as well as additional cellular stressors [138,139,140]. At the same time, both enzymes may not always work the same way; they can sometimes induce anti-apoptotic processes. A recent study indicates that p38 has a detrimental effect on JNK in some cellular situations [141].
The EGCG influence was studied on the cloned osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells, derived from newborn mouse calvaria. It was found that the attenuation of the p44/p42 MAP kinase pathway led to a reduction in the ET-1-stimulated IL-6 synthesis [58]. Studies performed on the same cell line also showed that the inhibition of p44/p42 MAP kinase led to the suppression of PGD2-stimulated HSP27 induction through the inhibition of p44/p42 MAP kinase and thus the modulation of osteoblast cell function towards bone formation [27]. In a similar study, the attenuation of p44/p42 MAP kinase and p38 MAP kinase led to a reduction in FGF-2-stimulated IL-6 synthesis at least partly via the attenuation of p44/p42 MAP kinase and p38 MAP kinase [59]. The suppression of p44/p42 MAP kinase can also lead to the suppression of IGF-I-induced osteoblast migration [39].

3.10. Inhibitory Effect on Matrix Metalloproteinases

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) include the family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases commonly classified on the basis of their substrates and the organization of structural domains, including collagenases (MMP-1, -8, -13, and -18), gelatinases (MMP-2 and -9), stromelysins (MMP-3 and -10), matrilysins, membrane-type (MT) MMPs, and other metalloproteinases. This enzyme family has the combined ability to degrade the organic components of the connective tissue matrix [53]. Generally, the structure of these enzymes includes a propeptide sequence, a hinge region or linker peptide, a hemopexin domain, and a catalytic metalloproteinase domain containing a catalytic zinc ion [142].
Shifts in MMP expression and activity are observed during common biological processes like pregnancy and wound healing. Moreover, such changes have also been implicated in cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis, aneurysms, and varicose veins, musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis and bone resorption, and various cancers [142]. Therefore, changes in the profiles of MMPs can be used as an important biomarker to track cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders, and cancer development in the human body.
The regeneration of bones and their repair depend on many regulated mechanisms. MMP regulation plays a key role in this process. MMPs, produced by bone cells in an active state, are essential for chondrocyte formation and development processes and the viability and functionality of osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and osteocytes [143]. Particularly, MMP-9 or gelatinase-B is also a type IV collagenase. It is primarily produced by cell types such as osteoblasts, dendritic cells, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, T-cells, macrophages, and granulocytes [142,144]. The expression of MMP-9 in osteoclasts is significantly higher than in other cell types [53]. According to Khoswanto, MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-13 play especially significant roles in bone tissue [143]. MMP-2 appears to alter bone growth by inducing osteoclast and osteoblast activity and differentiation. Animals deficient in MMP-9 exhibited abnormal bone formation mainly during endochondral ossification.
In an in vitro study, EGCG was shown to inhibit osteoclast formation and reduce MMP-9 expression in osteoblasts, which contributed to the suppression of bone resorption [37]. Additionally, in cultures of rat osteoclast precursor cells and mature osteoclasts, the inhibition of MMP-2 and MMP-9 enzymatic activity was noted, and along with decreased MMP-9 mRNA expression in precursor cells, it significantly impaired both the formation and differentiation of osteoclasts [53].

3.11. Antioxidant Properties of EGCG

EGCG reveals antioxidant activity [145,146]. However, it has also been reported that the production of hydroxyl radicals is increased by flavonoids [147]. In the Fenton reaction (Figure 3), hydroxide ions (OH) and hydroxyl radicals (OH) are formed in the reaction of iron(II) (Fe2+) with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [148]. A study by Nakagawa et al. performed on crude murine osteoclast-like multinucleated cells (OCLs) showed that the reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II) was promoted by EGCG. EGCG promoted the reduction process, and single-strand DNA breakage in a cell-free system was induced by the combination of EGCG/Fe(III)/H2O2. Single-strand DNA damage was induced by EGCG in a dose-dependent manner in the presence of both Fe(III) and H2O2, which indirectly indicates the presence of hydroxyl radicals, which are difficult to detect directly. It led to the inhibition of bone resorption by inducing the apoptotic death of murine osteoclast-like cells [36]. In contrast, Wang et al. [40] proved that the viability of hBM-MSCs improved after treatment with EGCG. The H2O2-induced adverse effect was nullified by treatment with EGCG, as evidenced by ALP activity, calcium deposition, and the gene expressions of Runx2 and Osx. EGCG also enhanced the osteogenic differentiation of hBM-MSCs.

3.12. Hormetic Properties and Toxicity of EGCG

EGCG exhibits a biphasic dose–response relationship in cellular systems: at low concentrations, it demonstrates antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and osteoprotective properties, whereas at higher concentrations, it can exert cytotoxic effects. This dual activity is attributed to the pro-oxidative potential of EGCG under specific cellular and environmental conditions [149].
In a study conducted on astrocytes, it was shown that EGCG at a high concentration (50 μM) induced mitochondrial membrane depolarisation and activated the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP). This led to a sharp decline in the inner mitochondrial membrane potential, increased permeability to ions and small molecules, and mitochondrial swelling, thereby increasing the risk of membrane rupture. Concurrently, pro-apoptotic proteins, such as cytochrome c, were released into the cytoplasm. In comparison, the effect at a concentration of 1 μM was significantly weaker [150]. Similar phenomena were observed in studies on human cancer cell lines and rat hepatocytes [151].
EGCG itself can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) via auto-oxidation at high concentrations, particularly through Fenton-like reactions in the presence of elevated levels of iron ions (Fe2⁺), such as in the liver or tumour tissues, and copper ions (Cu⁺), which may accumulate in certain inflammatory conditions [148,152,153,154]. Additionally, EGCG can enhance oxidative stress when combined with cytotoxic agents (doxorubicin and bortezomib), heavy metals (e.g., cadmium), ultraviolet radiation, or H2O2 [155,156,157,158,159].
Furthermore, excess EGCG has been shown to induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and disrupt proper protein folding, leading to the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). In mouse-derived MRPE cells, EGCG reduced the expression of chaperones and UPR markers such as GRP78, CHOP, PERK, IRE1α, and caspase-12 [128]. Similarly, in studies on the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans, EGCG modulated cadmium-induced ER stress via the PERK–eIF2α–ATF4 signalling pathway [160].
However, at higher concentrations (≥50 μM), the increased expression of UPR markers was observed, indicating an activation of the stress response and the potential induction of cell death [161]. A review by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) indicates that a daily oral dose of EGCG ≥800 mg may lead to hepatotoxicity, highlighting the importance of defining safe dose ranges and confirming the hormetic properties of this compound. In a mouse model, EGCG at a dose of 1500 mg/kg induced acute liver injury, while doses in the range of 400–800 mg/kg were toxic under conditions of dietary restriction (Figure 4) [162].
Major conclusions are as follows:
  • EGCG reduces osteoclast differentiation and activation: EGCG administration leads to a reduction in osteoclast differentiation and activation by increasing OPG mRNA expression and inhibiting RANK ligand production [19,36,42].
  • It enhances OPG mRNA expression: EGCG exhibits a stronger capacity to enhance OPG mRNA expression in pluripotent stem cells compared to other green tea catechins, contributing to its role in bone health [42].
  • It influences bone growth and osteogenesis: EGCG promotes bone growth by stimulating VEGF synthesis, affecting the SAPK/JNK pathway, and reducing IL-6 synthesis [34,56,57,58,59].

4. Conclusions and Future Research Directions

Research on the effects of EGCG, the primary polyphenol found in green tea, on bone growth and development provides substantial evidence of its potential application in the treatment of skeletal system disorders. The findings summarised in this study suggest that it plays an important role in regulating bone metabolism, offering new perspectives for the treatment of bone diseases such as osteoporosis, and significantly contributing to bone tissue regeneration. The effects on bone health are summarised in Figure 5.
EGCG demonstrates the ability to stimulate bone mineralisation by enhancing ALP activity and regulating the expression of osteogenic genes such as Runx2, Osx, and Bmp-2. In vitro studies on cell lines have shown that this compound promotes osteoblast differentiation and the formation of mineralised bone nodules. Furthermore, it supports bone regeneration by increasing bone callus formation and modifying collagen membranes. However, its effects are dose-dependent, and high concentrations (above 25 μM) may inhibit the proliferation of mesenchymal cells involved in osteogenesis, whereas intermediate concentrations (1–10 μM) promote these processes [26,28,30,48]. EGCG also exerts a protective effect on bone tissue by inhibiting bone resorption. This mechanism involves the induction of osteoclast apoptosis through its influence on the Fenton reaction and caspase-3 activation. Additionally, by regulating the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway, it reduces osteoclastogenesis. EGCG increases OPG expression while lowering the RANKL/OPG ratio, resulting in decreased osteoclast differentiation and activity, thus helping to prevent the loss of bone mass. Moreover, EGCG improves bone microarchitecture, enhancing parameters such as BMD and trabecular thickness [19,44].
It is interesting that EGCG inhibits the production of IL-6 and the activation of MAPK pathways (e.g., p44/p42 and JNK), thereby reducing inflammation and bone resorption [54]. At the same time, it stimulates the synthesis of VEGF, supporting angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Similar to most flavonoids, it exhibits antioxidant properties, neutralising reactive oxygen species. As a result, it protects bone cells from oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, key risk factors for osteoporosis and other skeletal disorders, helping to maintain healthy bone structure and enhance regenerative processes [108,109,110,112]. Additionally, it may influence calcium metabolism by modulating the expression of specific calcium transporters and receptors responsible for maintaining calcium homeostasis. Optimising calcium transport and storage in bone cells promotes more effective mineralisation and improves bone tissue quality (Figure 6) [30,40,49].
However, it is worth noting that the stability of this compound is limited because it undergoes rapid degradation on the way to epimerization and auto-oxidation, influenced by factors such as pH, temperature, and oxygen exposure [154]. This poses a challenge to its therapeutic application. Despite the fact that we already know a lot about this topic, there is still a need for more well-designed and controlled clinical trials to validate the results from preclinical studies. It is especially important for individuals at risk of osteoporosis to determine the effectiveness and safety of EGCG supplementation. What is more, research about the molecular mechanisms underlying its effects on bone cells is necessary. This is very important to provide insights into its potential therapeutic applications through the comprehension of specific pathways. Establishing a proper dose to determine the optimal influence and adverse effects for bone health is also a future research direction. Last but not least, research for the long-term effects of EGCG supplementation is necessary to assess its impact on bone mineral density, fracture risk, and overall bone quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.W.-N., P.W. and T.G.; investigation, P.W. and T.G.; writing—original draft preparation, P.W., K.C., J.L. and B.C.-G.; writing—review and editing, A.M., B.C.-G., J.K., M.W.-N., T.K. and T.G.; visualisation, T.K., J.K. and K.C.; funding acquisition, T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant number 2019/35/B/NZ7/01165.

Acknowledgments

Parts of the figures were drawn using pictures from Servier Medical Art. Servier Medical Art by Servier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (accessed on 11 May 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ALPAlkaline phosphatase
BMDBone mineral density
hBM-MSCsBone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells
BMP-2Bone morphogenetic protein 2
BMP-4Bone morphogenetic protein 4
CGAChlorogenic acid
CLCCardiotrophin-like cytokine
COL1Type I collagen
CNTFCiliary neurotrophic factor
CT-1Cardiotrophin 1
ECEpicatechin
ECGEpicatechin gallate
EGCEpigallocatechin
EGCG(–)-Epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate
ERKsExtracellular regulated p42/p44 kinases
FGRFibroblast growth factor
GTCsGreen tea catechins
GTEGreen tea extract
hABCsHuman alveolar bone-derived cells
hMSCsHuman mesenchymal stem cells
hPDLCsHuman periodontal ligament cells
ICHIntracerebral haemorrhage
IFN-β2Interferon β2
IGF-IInsulin-like growth factor 1
IhhIndian Hedgehog
ILInterleukin
JNKJun amino-terminal kinases
LIFLeukaemia inhibitory factor
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinases
M-CSFMacrophage colony-stimulating factor
MMPMatrix metalloproteinase
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa-B
NFATc1Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells 1
OCNOsteocalcin
ONCOsteonectin
OPGOsteoprotegerin
OPNOsteopontin
OSMOncostatin M
OSE2Osteoblast-specific cis-acting element 2
OSXOsterix
PiInorganic phosphate
PPiInorganic pyrophosphate
RANKReceptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B
RANKLReceptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand
ROSReactive oxygen species
RUNX2Runt-related transcription factor 2
SAPKStress-activated protein kinases
Sp7Specific protein 7
TGF-αTumour growth factor α
TGF-βTumour growth factor β
TNSALPTissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase
TNF-αTumour necrosis factor α
TRAFTNF receptor-associated factor
TRAPTartrate-resistant acid phosphatase
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor
WntWingless-related integration site

References

  1. Singh, B.N.; Shankar, S.; Srivastava, R.K. Green Tea Catechin, Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG): Mechanisms, Perspectives and Clinical Applications. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 82, 1807–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khan, N.; Afaq, F.; Saleem, M.; Ahmad, N.; Mukhtar, H. Targeting Multiple Signaling Pathways by Green Tea Polyphenol (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 2500–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mokra, D.; Joskova, M.; Mokry, J. Therapeutic Effects of Green Tea Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) in Relation to Molecular Pathways Controlling Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shen, C.-L.; Yeh, J.K.; Stoecker, B.J.; Chyu, M.-C.; Wang, J.-S. Green Tea Polyphenols Mitigate Deterioration of Bone Microarchitecture in Middle-Aged Female Rats. Bone 2009, 44, 684–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Farhan, M. Green Tea Catechins: Nature’s Way of Preventing and Treating Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, C.; Suen, C.L.-C.; Yang, C.; Quek, S.Y. Antioxidant Capacity and Major Polyphenol Composition of Teas as Affected by Geographical Location, Plantation Elevation and Leaf Grade. Food Chem. 2018, 244, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kada, T.; Kaneko, K.; Matsuzaki, S.; Matsuzaki, T.; Hora, Y. Detection and Chemical Identification of Natural Bio-Antimutagens: A Case of the Green Tea Factor. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 1985, 150, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jin, J.-Q.; Jiang, C.-K.; Yao, M.-Z.; Chen, L. Baiyacha, a Wild Tea Plant Naturally Occurring High Contents of Theacrine and 3″-Methyl-Epigallocatechin Gallate from Fujian, China. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, Y.; Long, Y.; Fang, J.; Liu, G. Advances in the Anti-Atherosclerotic Mechanisms of Epigallocatechin Gallate. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bellmann-Strobl, J.; Paul, F.; Wuerfel, J.; Dörr, J.; Infante-Duarte, C.; Heidrich, E.; Körtgen, B.; Brandt, A.; Pfüller, C.; Radbruch, H.; et al. Epigallocatechin Gallate in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflam. 2021, 8, e981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Platero, J.L.; Cuerda-Ballester, M.; Ibáñez, V.; Sancho, D.; Lopez-Rodríguez, M.M.; Drehmer, E.; de la Rubia Ortí, J.E. The Impact of Coconut Oil and Epigallocatechin Gallate on the Levels of IL-6, Anxiety and Disability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Nutrients 2020, 12, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lovera, J.; Ramos, A.; Devier, D.; Garrison, V.; Kovner, B.; Reza, T.; Koop, D.; Rooney, W.; Foundas, A.; Bourdette, D. Polyphenon E, Non-Futile at Neuroprotection in Multiple Sclerosis but Unpredictably Hepatotoxic: Phase I Single Group and Phase II Randomized Placebo-Controlled Studies. J. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 358, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jing, F.; Zhu, L.; Bai, J.; Cai, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Li, T. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate-Mediated Inhibition of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinogenesis. Arch. Oral Biol. 2023, 153, 105740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, C.; Wu, H.; Duan, H.; Hou, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, H.; Gong, L.; Wan, H.; et al. An EGCG-Mediated Self-Assembled Micellar Complex Acts as a Bioactive Drug Carrier. Food Chem. 2023, 418, 135939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Singh, N.A.; Mandal, A.K.A.; Khan, Z.A. Potential Neuroprotective Properties of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG). Nutr. J. 2015, 15, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bao, B.; Yin, X.-P.; Wen, X.-Q.; Suo, Y.-J.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Li, D.-L.; Lai, Q.; Cao, X.-M.; Qu, Q.-M. The Protective Effects of EGCG Was Associated with HO-1 Active and Microglia Pyroptosis Inhibition in Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurochem. Int. 2023, 170, 105603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wan, C.; Hu, X.; Li, M.; Rengasamy, K.R.R.; Cai, Y.; Liu, Z. Potential Protective Function of Green Tea Polyphenol EGCG against High Glucose-Induced Cardiac Injury and Aging. J. Funct. Foods 2023, 104, 105506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fan, Q.; Zhou, X.-H.; Wang, T.-F.; Zeng, F.-J.; Liu, X.; Gu, Y.; Chen, B.; Yang, J.; Pang, Z.-Y.; Liu, J.-G.; et al. Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate on Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Bone Loss in a Rat Periodontitis Model. J. Dent. Sci. 2023, 18, 1567–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, S.-T.; Kang, L.; Wang, C.-Z.; Huang, P.-J.; Huang, H.-T.; Lin, S.-Y.; Chou, S.-H.; Lu, C.-C.; Shen, P.-C.; Lin, Y.-S.; et al. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Decreases Osteoclastogenesis via Modulation of RANKL and Osteoprotegrin. Molecules 2019, 24, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cho, A.-R.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, D.-E.; Lee, J.-S.; Jung, U.-W.; Bak, E.-J.; Yoo, Y.-J.; Chung, W.-G.; Choi, S.-H. The Effect of Orally Administered Epigallocatechin-3-gallate on Ligature-induced Periodontitis in Rats. J. Periodontal Res. 2013, 48, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lin, S.-Y.; Kan, J.Y.; Lu, C.-C.; Huang, H.H.; Cheng, T.-L.; Huang, H.-T.; Ho, C.-J.; Lee, T.-C.; Chuang, S.-C.; Lin, Y.-S.; et al. Green Tea Catechin (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Facilitates Fracture Healing. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Bi, K.; He, Y.; Yan, W.; Yang, C.S.; Zhang, J. Potential Protective Mechanisms of Green Tea Polyphenol EGCG against COVID-19. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 114, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Muraki, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Ishibashi, H.; Oka, H.; Yoshimura, N.; Kawaguchi, H.; Nakamura, K. Diet and Lifestyle Associated with Increased Bone Mineral Density: Cross-Sectional Study of Japanese Elderly Women at an Osteoporosis Outpatient Clinic. J. Orthop. Sci. 2007, 12, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, X.; Shi, X.; Chen, X.; Yin, Z. Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) Can Epigenetically Regulate the Receptor of Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) to Ameliorate Osteoarthritis. J. Funct. Foods 2023, 107, 105682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zou, J.; Chen, F.; Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Sun, T.; Du, S.; Zhang, J. Effects of Green Tea Extract Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) on Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Root Resorption in Rats. Arch. Oral Biol. 2023, 150, 105691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, C.-H.; Ho, M.-L.; Chang, J.-K.; Hung, S.-H.; Wang, G.-J. Green Tea Catechin Enhances Osteogenesis in a Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Line. Osteoporos. Int. 2005, 16, 2039–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yamauchi, J.; Takai, S.; Matsushima-Nishiwaki, R.; Hanai, Y.; Doi, T.; Kato, H.; Ogura, S.; Kato, K.; Tokuda, H.; Kozawa, O. (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Inhibits Prostaglandin D2-Stimulated HSP27 Induction via Suppression of the P44/P42 MAP Kinase Pathway in Osteoblasts. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2007, 77, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rodriguez, R.; Kondo, H.; Nyan, M.; Hao, J.; Miyahara, T.; Ohya, K.; Kasugai, S. Implantation of Green Tea Catechin α-Tricalcium Phosphate Combination Enhances Bone Repair in Rat Skull Defects. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2011, 98B, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, J.; Lu, Y.; Liu, J.; Jin, C.; Meng, Y.; Pei, D. Influence of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate in Promoting Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Cells. BMC Oral Health 2019, 19, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mah, Y.-J.; Song, J.S.; Kim, S.-O.; Lee, J.-H.; Jeon, M.; Jung, U.-W.; Moon, S.J.; Kim, J.-H.; Choi, H.-J. The Effect of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) on Human Alveolar Bone Cells Both in Vitro and in Vivo. Arch. Oral Biol. 2014, 59, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jin, P.; Li, M.; Xu, G.; Zhang, K.; Zheng, L.; Zhao, J. Role of (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate in the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Enhancer or an Inducer? Exp. Ther. Med. 2015, 10, 828–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shin, J.W.; Wu, Y.; Kang, Y.G.; Kim, J.K.; Choi, H.J.; Shin, J.-W. The Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate and Mechanical Stimulation on Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Individual or Synergistic Effects. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017, 14, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, W.; Fan, J.-B.; Xu, D.-W.; Zhang, J.; Cui, Z.-M. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Protects against Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Induced Inhibition of Osteogenesis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2016, 241, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hayashi, K.; Takai, S.; Matsushima-Nishiwaki, R.; Hanai, Y.; Kato, K.; Tokuda, H.; Kozawa, O. (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Reduces Transforming Growth Factor β-Stimulated HSP27 Induction through the Suppression of Stress-Activated Protein Kinase/c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase in Osteoblasts. Life Sci. 2008, 82, 1012–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, C.-H.; Kang, L.; Lin, R.-W.; Fu, Y.-C.; Lin, Y.-S.; Chang, J.-K.; Chen, H.-T.; Chen, C.-H.; Lin, S.-Y.; Wang, G.-J.; et al. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Improves Bone Microarchitecture in Ovariectomized Rats. Menopause 2013, 20, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nakagawa, H.; Wachi, M.; Woo, J.-T.; Kato, M.; Kasai, S.; Takahashi, F.; Lee, I.-S.; Nagai, K. Fenton Reaction Is Primarily Involved in a Mechanism of (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate to Induce Osteoclastic Cell Death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 292, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yun, J.-H.; Pang, E.-K.; Kim, C.-S.; Yoo, Y.-J.; Cho, K.-S.; Chai, J.-K.; Kim, C.-K.; Choi, S.-H. Inhibitory Effects of Green Tea Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate on the Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 and on the Formation of Osteoclasts. J. Periodontal Res. 2004, 39, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kamon, M.; Zhao, R.; Sakamoto, K. Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin gallate suppressed the differentiation of murine osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2009, 34, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kawabata, T.; Tokuda, H.; Sakai, G.; Fujita, K.; Matsushima-Nishiwaki, R.; Otsuka, T.; Kozawa, O. Repression of IGF-I-Induced Osteoblast Migration by (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate through P44/P42 MAP Kinase Signaling. Biomed. Rep. 2018, 9, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, F.; Wang, B.; Han, K.; Sun, D.; Li, L. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Protects against Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Inhibition of Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lin, S.-Y.; Kang, L.; Wang, C.-Z.; Huang, H.; Cheng, T.-L.; Huang, H.-T.; Lee, M.-J.; Lin, Y.-S.; Ho, M.-L.; Wang, G.-J.; et al. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Enhances Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Molecules 2018, 23, 3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, C.-H.; Ho, M.-L.; Chang, J.-K.; Hung, S.-H.; Huang, H.-T. Green Tea Catechins Enhance the Expression of Osteoprotegerin (OPG) in Pluripotent Stem Cells. J. Orthop. Surg. Taiwan 2003, 20, 178–183. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fujita, K.; Otsuka, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Kainuma, S.; Ohguchi, R.; Kawabata, T.; Sakai, G.; Kuroyanagi, G.; Matsushima-Nishiwaki, R.; Kozawa, O.; et al. (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate but Not Chlorogenic Acid Upregulates Osteoprotegerin Synthesis through Regulation of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 in Osteoblasts. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 14, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lin, S.-Y.; Kang, L.; Chen, J.-C.; Wang, C.-Z.; Huang, H.H.; Lee, M.-J.; Cheng, T.-L.; Chang, C.-F.; Lin, Y.-S.; Chen, C.-H. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Enhances Healing of Femoral Bone Defect. Phytomedicine 2019, 55, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chu, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R.; Liu, L.; Rung, S.; Xiang, L.; Wu, Y.; Du, S.; Man, Y.; et al. Evaluation of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Modified Collagen in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) Surgery and Modulation of Macrophage Phenotype. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 99, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yun, J.-H.; Kim, C.-S.; Cho, K.-S.; Chai, J.-K.; Kim, C.-K.; Choi, S.-H. (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Induces Apoptosis, via Caspase Activation, in Osteoclasts Differentiated from RAW 264.7 Cells. J. Periodontal Res. 2007, 42, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xu, H.; Liu, T.; Li, J.; Xu, J.; Chen, F.; Hu, L.; Zhang, B.; Zi, C.; Wang, X.; Sheng, J. Oxidation Derivative of (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Inhibits RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis by Suppressing RANK Signaling Pathways in RAW 264.7 Cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 118, 109237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vali, B.; Rao, L.; Elsohemy, A. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Increases the Formation of Mineralized Bone Nodules by Human Osteoblast-like Cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2007, 18, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Takita, H.; Kikuchi, M.; Sato, Y.; Kuboki, Y. Inhibition of BMP-Induced Ectopic Bone Formation by an Antiangiogenic Agent (Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate). Connect. Tissue Res. 2002, 43, 520–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lee, J.-H.; Jin, H.; Shim, H.-E.; Kim, H.-N.; Ha, H.; Lee, Z.H. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Inhibits Osteoclastogenesis by Down-Regulating c-Fos Expression and Suppressing the Nuclear Factor-κB Signal. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 77, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Morinobu, A.; Biao, W.; Tanaka, S.; Horiuchi, M.; Jun, L.; Tsuji, G.; Sakai, Y.; Kurosaka, M.; Kumagai, S. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Suppresses Osteoclast Differentiation and Ameliorates Experimental Arthritis in Mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58, 2012–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lin, R.-W.; Chen, C.-H.; Wang, Y.-H.; Ho, M.-L.; Hung, S.-H.; Chen, I.-S.; Wang, G.-J. (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Inhibition of Osteoclastic Differentiation via NF-κB. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 379, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Oka, Y.; Iwai, S.; Amano, H.; Irie, Y.; Yatomi, K.; Ryu, K.; Yamada, S.; Inagaki, K.; Oguchi, K. Tea Polyphenols Inhibit Rat Osteoclast Formation and Differentiation. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 118, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ishida, I.; Kohda, C.; Yanagawa, Y.; Miyaoka, H.; Shimamura, T. Epigallocatechin Gallate Suppresses Expression of Receptor Activator of NF-κB Ligand (RANKL) in Staphylococcus Aureus Infection in Osteoblast-like NRG Cells. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 1042–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ko, C.H.; Lau, K.M.; Choy, W.Y.; Leung, P.C. Effects of Tea Catechins, Epigallocatechin, Gallocatechin, and Gallocatechin Gallate, on Bone Metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 7293–7297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tokuda, H.; Takai, S.; Matsushima-Nishiwaki, R.; Akamatsu, S.; Hanai, Y.; Hosoi, T.; Harada, A.; Ohta, T.; Kozawa, O. (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Enhances Prostaglandin F2α-Induced VEGF Synthesis via Upregulating SAPK/JNK Activation in Osteoblasts. J. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 100, 1146–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Takai, S.; Matsushima-Nishiwaki, R.; Adachi, S.; Natsume, H.; Minamitani, C.; Mizutani, J.; Otsuka, T.; Tokuda, H.; Kozawa, O. (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Reduces Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB-Stimulated Interleukin-6 Synthesis in Osteoblasts: Suppression of SAPK/JNK. Mediat. Inflamm. 2008, 2008, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tokuda, H.; Takai, S.; Hanai, Y.; Matsushima-Nishiwaki, R.; Hosoi, T.; Harada, A.; Ohta, T.; Kozawa, O. (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Suppresses Endothelin-1-Induced Interleukin-6 Synthesis in Osteoblasts: Inhibition of P44/P42 MAP Kinase Activation. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 1311–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tokuda, H.; Takai, S.; Hanai, Y.; Matsushima-Nishiwaki, R.; Yamauchi, J.; Harada, A.; Hosoi, T.; Ohta, T.; Kozawa, O. (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Inhibits Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor-Stimulated Interleukin-6 Synthesis in Osteoblasts. Horm. Metab. Res. 2008, 40, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Islam, S.; Islam, N.; Kermode, T.; Johnstone, B.; Mukhtar, H.; Moskowitz, R.W.; Goldberg, V.M.; Malemud, C.J.; Haqqi, T.M. Involvement of Caspase-3 in Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate-Mediated Apoptosis of Human Chondrosarcoma Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 270, 793–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ono, T.; Hayashi, M.; Sasaki, F.; Nakashima, T. RANKL Biology: Bone Metabolism, the Immune System, and Beyond. Inflamm. Regen. 2020, 40, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hofbauer, L.C.; Neubauer, A.; Heufelder, A.E. Receptor Activator of Nuclear factor-κB Ligand and Osteoprotegerin. Cancer 2001, 92, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Teitelbaum, S.L.; Ross, F.P. Genetic Regulation of Osteoclast Development and Function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4, 638–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Simonet, W.S.; Lacey, D.L.; Dunstan, C.R.; Kelley, M.; Chang, M.-S.; Lüthy, R.; Nguyen, H.Q.; Wooden, S.; Bennett, L.; Boone, T. Osteoprotegerin: A Novel Secreted Protein Involved in the Regulation of Bone Density. Cell 1997, 89, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Anandarajah, A.P. Role of RANKL in Bone Diseases. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 20, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Udagawa, N.; Koide, M.; Nakamura, M.; Nakamichi, Y.; Yamashita, T.; Uehara, S.; Kobayashi, Y.; Furuya, Y.; Yasuda, H.; Fukuda, C.; et al. Osteoclast Differentiation by RANKL and OPG Signaling Pathways. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2021, 39, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Schneeweis, L.A.; Willard, D.; Milla, M.E. Functional Dissection of Osteoprotegerin and Its Interaction with Receptor Activator of NF-kappaB Ligand. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 41155–41164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Naito, A.; Azuma, S.; Tanaka, S.; Miyazaki, T.; Takaki, S.; Takatsu, K.; Nakao, K.; Nakamura, K.; Katsuki, M.; Yamamoto, T.; et al. Severe Osteopetrosis, Defective Interleukin-1 Signalling and Lymph Node Organogenesis in TRAF6-Deficient Mice. Genes Cells Devoted Mol. Cell. Mech. 1999, 4, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Boyce, B.F.; Xing, L. Biology of RANK, RANKL, and Osteoprotegerin. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2007, 9 (Suppl. 1), S1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Martin, T.J.; Sims, N.A. RANKL/OPG; Critical Role in Bone Physiology. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2015, 16, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Kuroyanagi, G.; Tokuda, H.; Yamamoto, N.; Nishiwaki, R.M.; Mizutani, J.; Kozawa, O.; Otsuka, T. Resveratrol Amplifies BMP-4-Stimulated Osteoprotegerin Synthesis via P38 MAP Kinase in Osteoblasts. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 3849–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Vimalraj, S. Alkaline Phosphatase: Structure, Expression and Its Function in Bone Mineralization. Gene 2020, 754, 144855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Golub, E.E.; Boesze-Battaglia, K. The Role of Alkaline Phosphatase in Mineralization. Curr. Opin. Orthop. 2007, 18, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sharma, U.; Pal, D.; Prasad, R. Alkaline Phosphatase: An Overview. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2014, 29, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Harmey, D.; Hessle, L.; Narisawa, S.; Johnson, K.A.; Terkeltaub, R.; Millán, J.L. Concerted Regulation of Inorganic Pyrophosphate and Osteopontin by Akp2, Enpp1, and Ank: An Integrated Model of the Pathogenesis of Mineralization Disorders. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 164, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ling, L.; Dombrowski, C.; Foong, K.M.; Haupt, L.M.; Stein, G.S.; Nurcombe, V.; Van Wijnen, A.J.; Cool, S.M. Synergism between Wnt3a and Heparin Enhances Osteogenesis via a Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Akt/RUNX2 Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 26233–26244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Miao, D.; Scutt, A. Histochemical Localization of Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Decalcified Bone and Cartilage. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2002, 50, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ziros, P.G.; Basdra, E.K.; Papavassiliou, A.G. Runx2: Of Bone and Stretch. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 40, 1659–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Komori, T. Regulation of Osteoblast Differentiation by Runx2. In Osteoimmunology; Choi, Y., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2010; Volume 658, pp. 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Komori, T. Molecular Mechanism of Runx2-Dependent Bone Development. Mol. Cells 2020, 43, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Komori, T. Roles of Runx2 in Skeletal Development. In RUNX Proteins in Development and Cancer; Groner, Y., Ito, Y., Liu, P., Neil, J.C., Speck, N.A., van Wijnen, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; Volume 962, pp. 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, W.; Toyosawa, S.; Furuichi, T.; Kanatani, N.; Yoshida, C.; Liu, Y.; Himeno, M.; Narai, S.; Yamaguchi, A.; Komori, T. Overexpression of Cbfa1 in Osteoblasts Inhibits Osteoblast Maturation and Causes Osteopenia with Multiple Fractures. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ducy, P.; Zhang, R.; Geoffroy, V.; Ridall, A.L.; Karsenty, G. Osf2/Cbfa1: A Transcriptional Activator of Osteoblast Differentiation. Cell 1997, 89, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Xiao, Z.-S.; Hjelmeland, A.B.; Quarles, L.D. Selective Deficiency of the “Bone-Related” Runx2-II Unexpectedly Preserves Osteoblast-Mediated Skeletogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 20307–20313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhang, C. Molecular Mechanisms of Osteoblast-Specific Transcription Factor Osterix Effect on Bone Formation. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2012, 44, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Sinha, K.M.; Zhou, X. Genetic and Molecular Control of Osterix in Skeletal Formation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 975–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liu, Q.; Li, M.; Wang, S.; Xiao, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, G. Recent Advances of Osterix Transcription Factor in Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 601224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Baek, W.-Y.; Lee, M.-A.; Jung, J.W.; Kim, S.-Y.; Akiyama, H.; De Crombrugghe, B.; Kim, J.-E. Positive Regulation of Adult Bone Formation by Osteoblast-Specific Transcription Factor Osterix. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 24, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ramazzotti, G.; Fiume, R.; Chiarini, F.; Campana, G.; Ratti, S.; Billi, A.M.; Manzoli, L.; Follo, M.Y.; Suh, P.-G.; McCubrey, J.; et al. Phospholipase C-Β1 Interacts with Cyclin E in Adipose- Derived Stem Cells Osteogenic Differentiation. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2019, 71, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Komori, T. Regulation of Bone Development and Extracellular Matrix Protein Genes by RUNX2. Cell Tissue Res. 2010, 339, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Dirzu, N.; Lucaciu, O.; Dirzu, D.S.; Soritau, O.; Cenariu, D.; Crisan, B.; Tefas, L.; Campian, R.S. BMP-2 Delivery through Liposomes in Bone Regeneration. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xiong, L.; Zeng, J.; Yao, A.; Tu, Q.; Li, J.; Yan, L.; Tang, Z. BMP2-Loaded Hollow Hydroxyapatite Microspheres Exhibit Enhanced Osteoinduction and Osteogenicity in Large Bone Defects. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Rosen, V. BMP2 Signaling in Bone Development and Repair. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009, 20, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chappuis, V.; Gamer, L.; Cox, K.; Lowery, J.W.; Bosshardt, D.D.; Rosen, V. Periosteal BMP2 Activity Drives Bone Graft Healing. Bone 2012, 51, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Marie, P.J.; Debiais, F.; Haÿ, E. Regulation of Human Cranial Osteoblast Phenotype by FGF-2, FGFR-2 and BMP-2 Signaling. Histol. Histopathol. 2002, 17, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Komori, T.; Yagi, H.; Nomura, S.; Yamaguchi, A.; Sasaki, K.; Deguchi, K.; Shimizu, Y.; Bronson, R.T.; Gao, Y.H.; Inada, M.; et al. Targeted Disruption of Cbfa1 Results in a Complete Lack of Bone Formation Owing to Maturational Arrest of Osteoblasts. Cell 1997, 89, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Fuentealba, L.C.; Eivers, E.; Ikeda, A.; Hurtado, C.; Kuroda, H.; Pera, E.M.; De Robertis, E.M. Integrating Patterning Signals: Wnt/GSK3 Regulates the Duration of the BMP/Smad1 Signal. Cell 2007, 131, 980–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Barna, M.; Niswander, L. Visualization of Cartilage Formation: Insight into Cellular Properties of Skeletal Progenitors and Chondrodysplasia Syndromes. Dev. Cell 2007, 12, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hofbauer, L.C.; Dunstan, C.R.; Spelsberg, T.C.; Riggs, B.L.; Khosla, S. Osteoprotegerin Production by Human Osteoblast Lineage Cells Is Stimulated by Vitamin D, Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2, and Cytokines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 250, 776–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gerber, H.-P.; Vu, T.H.; Ryan, A.M.; Kowalski, J.; Werb, Z.; Ferrara, N. VEGF Couples Hypertrophic Cartilage Remodeling, Ossification and Angiogenesis during Endochondral Bone Formation. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Wang, X.; Bove, A.M.; Simone, G.; Ma, B. Molecular Bases of VEGFR-2-Mediated Physiological Function and Pathological Role. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 599281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Schipani, E.; Maes, C.; Carmeliet, G.; Semenza, G.L. Regulation of Osteogenesis-Angiogenesis Coupling by HIFs and VEGF. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 24, 1347–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Wang, J.; Fu, X.; Jiang, C.; Yu, L.; Wang, M.; Han, W.; Liu, L.; Wang, J. Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Transplantation Promotes Therapeutic Angiogenesis via Upregulation of the VEGF–VEGFR2 Signaling Pathway in a Rat Model of Vascular Dementia. Behav. Brain Res. 2014, 265, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Jacobsen, K.A.; Al-Aql, Z.S.; Wan, C.; Fitch, J.L.; Stapleton, S.N.; Mason, Z.D.; Cole, R.M.; Gilbert, S.R.; Clemens, T.L.; Morgan, E.F.; et al. Bone Formation During Distraction Osteogenesis Is Dependent on Both VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 Signaling. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23, 596–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Pufe, T.; Kurz, B.; Petersen, W.; Varoga, D.; Mentlein, R.; Kulow, S.; Lemke, A.; Tillmann, B. The Influence of Biomechanical Parameters on the Expression of VEGF and Endostatin in the Bone and Joint System. Ann. Anat. Anat. Anz. 2005, 187, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hu, K.; Olsen, B.R. Osteoblast-Derived VEGF Regulates Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation during Bone Repair. J. Clin. Invest. 2016, 126, 509–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rumney, R.M.H.; Lanham, S.A.; Kanczler, J.M.; Kao, A.P.; Thiagarajan, L.; Dixon, J.E.; Tozzi, G.; Oreffo, R.O.C. In Vivo Delivery of VEGF RNA and Protein to Increase Osteogenesis and Intraosseous Angiogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Rose-John, S. Interleukin-6 Family Cytokines. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a028415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Uciechowski, P.; Dempke, W.C.M. Interleukin-6: A Masterplayer in the Cytokine Network. Oncology 2020, 98, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Scheller, J.; Chalaris, A.; Schmidt-Arras, D.; Rose-John, S. The Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of the Cytokine Interleukin-6. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2011, 1813, 878–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kaur, S.; Bansal, Y.; Kumar, R.; Bansal, G. A Panoramic Review of IL-6: Structure, Pathophysiological Roles and Inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Garbers, C.; Thaiss, W.; Jones, G.W.; Waetzig, G.H.; Lorenzen, I.; Guilhot, F.; Lissilaa, R.; Ferlin, W.G.; Grötzinger, J.; Jones, S.A.; et al. Inhibition of Classic Signaling Is a Novel Function of Soluble Glycoprotein 130 (Sgp130), Which Is Controlled by the Ratio of Interleukin 6 and Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 42959–42970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Masjedi, A.; Hashemi, V.; Hojjat-Farsangi, M.; Ghalamfarsa, G.; Azizi, G.; Yousefi, M.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F. The Significant Role of Interleukin-6 and Its Signaling Pathway in the Immunopathogenesis and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 1415–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kumari, N.; Dwarakanath, B.S.; Das, A.; Bhatt, A.N. Role of Interleukin-6 in Cancer Progression and Therapeutic Resistance. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 11553–11572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Ghandadi, M.; Sahebkar, A. Interleukin-6: A Critical Cytokine in Cancer Multidrug Resistance. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Suda, T.; Takahashi, N.; Udagawa, N.; Jimi, E.; Gillespie, M.T.; Martin, T.J. Modulation of Osteoclast Differentiation and Function by the New Members of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor and Ligand Families. Endocr. Rev. 1999, 20, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tanaka, T.; Narazaki, M.; Ogata, A.; Kishimoto, T. A new era for the treatment of inflammatory autoimmune diseases by interleukin-6 blockade strategy. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Gabay, C.; Emery, P.; Van Vollenhoven, R.; Dikranian, A.; Alten, R.; Pavelka, K.; Klearman, M.; Musselman, D.; Agarwal, S.; Green, J.; et al. Tocilizumab Monotherapy versus Adalimumab Monotherapy for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (ADACTA): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Phase 4 Trial. Lancet 2013, 381, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Boatright, K.M.; Renatus, M.; Scott, F.L.; Sperandio, S.; Shin, H.; Pedersen, I.M.; Ricci, J.-E.; Edris, W.A.; Sutherlin, D.P.; Green, D.R.; et al. A Unified Model for Apical Caspase Activation. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Miura, M.; Chen, X.-D.; Allen, M.R.; Bi, Y.; Gronthos, S.; Seo, B.-M.; Lakhani, S.; Flavell, R.A.; Feng, X.-H.; Robey, P.G.; et al. A Crucial Role of Caspase-3 in Osteogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2004, 114, 1704–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Svandova, E.; Lesot, H.; Sharpe, P.; Matalova, E. Making the Head: Caspases in Life and Death. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 10, 1075751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Prokhorova, E.A.; Kopeina, G.S.; Lavrik, I.N.; Zhivotovsky, B. Apoptosis Regulation by Subcellular Relocation of Caspases. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Tait, S.W.G.; Green, D.R. Mitochondria and Cell Death: Outer Membrane Permeabilization and Beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ichim, G.; Lopez, J.; Ahmed, S.U.; Muthalagu, N.; Giampazolias, E.; Delgado, M.E.; Haller, M.; Riley, J.S.; Mason, S.M.; Athineos, D.; et al. Limited Mitochondrial Permeabilization Causes DNA Damage and Genomic Instability in the Absence of Cell Death. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 860–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Asadi, M.; Taghizadeh, S.; Kaviani, E.; Vakili, O.; Taheri-Anganeh, M.; Tahamtan, M.; Savardashtaki, A. Caspase-3: Structure, Function, and Biotechnological Aspects. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2022, 69, 1633–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zhang, S.; Cao, M.; Fang, F. The Role of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate in Autophagy and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress (ERS)-Induced Apoptosis of Human Diseases. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e924558-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Calles-Escandon, J.; Cipolla, M. Diabetes and Endothelial Dysfunction: A Clinical Perspective. Endocr. Rev. 2001, 22, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Karthikeyan, B.; Harini, L.; Krishnakumar, V.; Kannan, V.R.; Sundar, K.; Kathiresan, T. Insights on the Involvement of (–)-Epigallocatechin Gallate in ER Stress-Mediated Apoptosis in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Apoptosis 2017, 22, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Fritsche, L.G.; Fariss, R.N.; Stambolian, D.; Abecasis, G.R.; Curcio, C.A.; Swaroop, A. Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Genetics and Biology Coming Together. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2014, 15, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Lee, J.; Liu, L.; Levin, D.E. Stressing out or Stressing in: Intracellular Pathways for SAPK Activation. Curr. Genet. 2019, 65, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Yan, H.; He, L.; Lv, D.; Yang, J.; Yuan, Z. The Role of the Dysregulated JNK Signaling Pathway in the Pathogenesis of Human Diseases and Its Potential Therapeutic Strategies: A Comprehensive Review. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Davis, R.J. Signal Transduction by the JNK Group of MAP Kinases. Cell 2000, 103, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Hepp Rehfeldt, S.C.; Majolo, F.; Goettert, M.I.; Laufer, S. C-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Inhibitors as Potential Leads for New Therapeutics for Alzheimer’s Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Yung, J.H.M.; Giacca, A. Role of C-Jun N-Terminal Kinase (JNK) in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Cells 2020, 9, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Modi, V.; Dunbrack, R.L. A Structurally-Validated Multiple Sequence Alignment of 497 Human Protein Kinase Domains. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Pei, J.-J.; Braak, E.; Braak, H.; Grundke-Iqbal, I.; Iqbal, K.; Winblad, B.; Cowburn, R.F. Localization of Active Forms of C-Jun Kinase (JNK) and P38 Kinase in Alzheimer’s Disease Brains at Different Stages of Neurofibrillary Degeneration. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2001, 3, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Robinson, A.J.; Dickenson, J.M. Activation of the P38 and P42/P44 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Families by the Histamine H 1 Receptor in DDT 1 MF-2 Cells: H 1 -Receptor-Mediated MAPK Activation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 133, 1378–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Kanungo, J. DNA-PK and P38 MAPK: A Kinase Collusion in Alzheimer’s Disease? Brain Disord. Ther. 2017, 06, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Mittal, M.; Siddiqui, M.R.; Tran, K.; Reddy, S.P.; Malik, A.B. Reactive Oxygen Species in Inflammation and Tissue Injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 1126–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Coffey, E.T. Nuclear and Cytosolic JNK Signalling in Neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Yue, J.; López, J.M. Understanding MAPK Signaling Pathways in Apoptosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Cui, N.; Hu, M.; Khalil, R.A. Biochemical and Biological Attributes of Matrix Metalloproteinases. In Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 147, pp. 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Khoswanto, C. Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Bone Regeneration: Narrative Review. J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res. 2023, 13, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Nam, S.-I.; Kwon, T.-K. Dexamethasone Inhibits Interleukin-1β-Induced Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Expression in Cochlear Cells. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 7, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Anderson, R.F.; Fisher, L.J.; Hara, Y.; Harris, T.; Mak, W.B.; Melton, L.D.; Packer, J.E. Green Tea Catechins Partially Protect DNA from ·OH Radical- Induced Strand Breaks and Base Damage through Fast Chemical Repair of DNA Radicals. Carcinogenesis 2001, 22, 1189–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Bors, W.; Saran, M. Radical Scavenging by Flavonoid Antioxidants. Free Radic. Res. Commun. 1987, 2, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Canada, A.T.; Giannella, E.; Nguyen, T.D.; Mason, R.P. The Production of Reactive Oxygen Species by Dietary Flavonols. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1990, 9, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Stohs, S. Oxidative Mechanisms in the Toxicity of Metal Ions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1995, 18, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Calabrese, E.J.; Tsatsakis, A.; Agathokleous, E.; Giordano, J.; Calabrese, V. Does Green Tea Induce Hormesis? Dose-Response 2020, 18, 1559325820936170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Miao, Y.; Sun, X.; Gao, G.; Jia, X.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y.; Huang, L. Evaluation of (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG)-Induced Cytotoxicity on Astrocytes: A Potential Mechanism of Calcium Overloading-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Toxicol. In Vitro 2019, 61, 104592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Kucera, O.; Mezera, V.; Moravcova, A.; Endlicher, R.; Lotkova, H.; Drahota, Z.; Cervinkova, Z. In Vitro Toxicity of Epigallocatechin Gallate in Rat Liver Mitochondria and Hepatocytes. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 476180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Nakagawa, H.; Hasumi, K.; Woo, J.-T.; Nagai, K.; Wachi, M. Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide Primarily Contributes to the Induction of Fe(II)-Dependent Apoptosis in Jurkat Cells by (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate. Carcinogenesis 2004, 25, 1567–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zwolak, I. Epigallocatechin Gallate for Management of Heavy Metal-Induced Oxidative Stress: Mechanisms of Action, Efficacy, and Concerns. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Wei, Y.; Chen, P.; Ling, T.; Wang, Y.; Dong, R.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Han, M.; Wang, D.; Wan, X.; et al. Certain (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Auto-Oxidation Products (EAOPs) Retain the Cytotoxic Activities of EGCG. Food Chem. 2016, 204, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Helvacioğlu, S.; Hamitoğlu, M.; Yildirim, E.; Korkut, Ş.V.; Yaba, A.; Aydin, A.; Helvacioğlu, S.; Hamitoğlu, M.; Yildirim, E.; Korkut, Ş.V.; et al. Protective Effects of Rosmarinic Acid and Epigallocatechin Gallate Against Doxorubicin-Induced Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity in CHO-K1 Cells. Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 2025, 21, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Cheng, Y.; Li, X.; Fang, M.-Y.; Ye, Q.-J.; Li, Z.-M.; Ahammed, G.J. Systemic H2O2 Signaling Mediates Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate-Induced Cadmium Tolerance in Tomato. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Wnuk, E.; Zwolak, I.; Kochanowicz, E. The Physiological Levels of Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) Enhance the Cd-Induced Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in CHO-K1 Cells. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Kim, S.-Y.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, B.-J.; Rah, S.-Y.; Chung, S.M.; Im, M.-J.; Kim, U.-H. Doxorubicin-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species Generation and Intracellular Ca2+increase Are Reciprocally Modulated in Rat Cardiomyocytes. Exp. Mol. Med. 2006, 38, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Shah, J.J.; Kuhn, D.J.; Orlowski, R.Z. Bortezomib and EGCG: No Green Tea for You? Blood 2009, 113, 5695–5696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  160. Wang, S.; Chen, C.; Lu, Y. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Reduces Cd-Induced Developmental Toxicity of Bodysize in Caenorhabditis Elegans via the PEK-1/eIF-2α/ATF-4 Pathway. Molecules 2023, 28, 6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Martinotti, S.; Ranzato, E.; Burlando, B. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Induces GRP78 Accumulation in the ER and Shifts Mesothelioma Constitutive UPR into Proapoptotic ER Stress. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 7082–7090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Shi, Z.; Zhu, J.; Guo, Y.; Niu, M.; Zhang, L.; Tu, C.; Huang, Y.; Li, P.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Frontiers | Epigallocatechin Gallate During Dietary Restriction —Potential Mechanisms of Enhanced Liver Injury. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 609378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Various functional effects of EGCG on bone health.
Figure 1. Various functional effects of EGCG on bone health.
Applsci 15 08182 g001
Figure 2. The EGCG impact on biochemical effects in bone health.
Figure 2. The EGCG impact on biochemical effects in bone health.
Applsci 15 08182 g002
Figure 3. The mechanism of the Fenton reaction.
Figure 3. The mechanism of the Fenton reaction.
Applsci 15 08182 g003
Figure 4. Toxic properties of EGCG; ER—endoplasmic reticulum.
Figure 4. Toxic properties of EGCG; ER—endoplasmic reticulum.
Applsci 15 08182 g004
Figure 5. The effects of EGCG on bone health.
Figure 5. The effects of EGCG on bone health.
Applsci 15 08182 g005
Figure 6. The effects of EGCG on osteoblasts, osteoclasts, signalling axes, and bone remodelling outcomes.
Figure 6. The effects of EGCG on osteoblasts, osteoclasts, signalling axes, and bone remodelling outcomes.
Applsci 15 08182 g006
Table 1. EGCG influence on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity.
Table 1. EGCG influence on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity.
Ref.Effects in
Cytobiochemistry
Cell LineFunctional Changes and
Methodology
Cell Culture Data
InfluenceEGCG Conc.
[26]Increasing the
expression of
osteogenic genes and elevating ALP
activity
D1ALP activity assayed by chemiluminescence
ALP activity (4 days):
increased
Solvent: DMSO, diluted in culture medium
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured in DMEM, FBS, β-glycerophosphate
Transcriptional changes: mRNA expressions (Cbfa1/Runx2, Osx, Alp, osteocalcin) measured
by RT-PCR
Stimulating
mineralization
1–10 µM
[29]Increasing ALP activity, mRNA, and protein
expression of COL1, RUNX2, OPN, and OSX
hPDLCsALP activity assayed quantitatively and qualitatively
ALP activity (7 days):
Significantly increased
at 2 and 4 µM of EGCG compared to control; 10 µM showed decreased ALP
Solvent: distilled water, diluted in culture medium
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium containing
α-MEM, FBS, L-ascorbic acid, dexamethasone,
β-glycerophosphate
Promoting hPDLC
osteogenesis
4, 6 µM
[33]Increasing ALP activity/mineralization and the expression of the RUNX2 and OSXhBM-MSCsALP activity assessed by staining and colorimetric assay
Functional osteogenesis: EGCG at 5 and 10 μM promoted ALP activity
and mineralization; 20
and 40 μM had no effect
Solvent: EGCG added directly to culture media at specified concentrations
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured
in osteogenic differentiation medium containing
β-glycerol phosphate, dexamethasone, ascorbic acid 2-phosphate
Preventing TNFα inhibition of survival, osteogenic differentiation of hBM-MSCs
(EGCG low conc.)
5 µM
[41]Increasing the expression of BMP-2, RUNX2, ALP, ONC, and OCN mRNA, ALP activity, and mineralizationhBM-MSCsTranscriptional changes:
mRNA levels of RUNX2, BMP-2, ALP, osteonectin, and osteocalcin measured by RT PCR
Protein/functional changes:
ALP activity measured by chemiluminescent assay
mRNA expression (qPCR): ALP increased
ALP activity: Increased
Solvent: EGCG in DMSO, diluted in culture medium
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured
in DMEM, β-glycerophosphate
Enhancement of osteogenic differentiation of hBM-MSCs1, 10 µM
[55]Increasing ALP activity and inhibition of mRNA expression of acid phosphataseUMR-106
RAW 264.7
Protein/functional changes:
ALP activity in UMR-106 cells assessed by colorimetric assay at day 4
EGC increased ALP activity by approximately 39.3% at 10 μM and 78.7% at 20 μM relative to control
GC and GCG showed slight, insignificant decreases in ALP activity
Solvent: Catechins (EGC, GC, GCG) dissolved
in DMSO, diluted in culture medium
Osteogenic substrate/status:
UMR-106 cells cultured in DMEM with FBS
Promoting osteoblastic activity and inhibiting osteoclast differentiation5–20 µM
[38]Suppressing the expression of mRNA of ALP and OCNMC3T3-E1ALP activity and gene expression (Alp, osteocalcin) measured at 4, 7, and 10 days of continuous EGCG exposure
Protein/functional changes:
ALP activity in MC3T3-E1 cells decreased dose-dependently with EGCG (1–10 μM) over time
Solvent: EGCG sourced from Mitsui Nourin
and added directly to culture medium (α-MEM,
FBS)
Osteogenic substrate/status:
MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in α-MEM with FBS,
ascorbic acid;
for mineralisation assay, cells treated with
β-glycerophosphate after initial differentiation
Decreasing the formation of osteoclasts10 µM
Abbreviations: ALP—alkaline phosphatase; BMP-2—bone morphogenetic protein; COL1—collagen type 1; D1—murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell line; DMSO—dimethyl sulfoxide; FBS—fetal bovine serum; hBM-MSCs—human bone marrow–mesenchymal stem cells; hPDLCs—human periodontal ligament cells; α-MEM—minimum essential medium, alpha modification; OCN—osteocalcin; ONC—osteonectin; OSX—Osterix; RT-PCR—real-time PCR; RUNX2—runt-related transcription factor 2; TNFα—tumour necrosis factor-α.
Table 2. EGCG influence on the RUNX2 protein level.
Table 2. EGCG influence on the RUNX2 protein level.
Ref.Effects
in Cytobiochemistry
Cell LineFunctional Changes and
Methodology
Cell Culture Data
InfluenceEGCG Conc.
[48]Increase in osteoblast differentiation and decrease in RUNX2 protein levelsSaOS-2Protein changes:
RUNX2 protein level analysed by Western blot. No change at 6 or 24 h; significant decrease (~65% reduction)
at 48 h with
5 µM of EGCG relative to control
Solvent: PBS; EGCG directly dissolved in culture medium
Osteogenic substrate/status:
Cells cultured in Ham’s F-12 medium with FBS, dexamethasone, ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate (added to induce mineralisation)
Increasing the formation of mineralised bone nodules from HOB-like cells by enhancing osteoblast differentiation5 µM
[33]Increasing ALP activity/mineralisation and increasing the expression of the RUNX2 and OSXhBM-MSCsTranscriptional changes (qPCR): Runx2 and Osx mRNA measured at day 16
of osteogenic differentiation. TNFα
(5–20 ng/mL) decreased Runx2
and Osx expression by up to ~20% at low doses and more at higher doses; EGCG at low doses (5 and 10 µM) reversed TNFα-induced suppression, restoring mRNA levels close to control
Solvent: EGCG was added directly to the culture medium
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells induced to differentiate with
osteogenic medium containing
β-glycerophosphate, dexamethasone, ascorbic acid 2-phosphate
Preventing TNFα inhibition of survival and osteogenic differentiation of human hBM-MSCs (at low conc. of EGCG)5 µM
[32]Increasing the expression of RUNX2, BMP-2, and VEGFhMSCsRUNX2 (osteogenic marker): EGCG alone significantly increased
expression over control; mechanical stretch alone increased both RUNX2 and myocardin; EGCG with
mechanical stretching induced the highest RUNX2 expression
Solvent: EGCG added to basal culture media
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured on fibronectin-coated elastomeric PDMS membranes; osteogenic differentiation induced by mechanical stretching and/or EGCG treatment in basal media without other osteogenic supplements
EGCG added 24 h after seeding; mechanical stretch applied 24 h after seeding for 4 h per day, repeated for 4 consecutive days; cells harvested immediately after last stimulation (total ~5 days culture)
Acceleration of osteogenic differentiation25 µM
[41]Increasing the expression of BMP-2, RUNX2, ALP, ONC, and OCN mRNA as well as ALP activity and mineralisationhBM-MSCsRunx2 mRNA increased by 57% and 85% at 24 h; 169% and 203% at 48 h
for 1 and 10 µM, respectively
Solvent: EGCG powder dissolved in DMSO stock, diluted in culture medium before use
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured in standard medium supplemented with β-glycerophosphate
Enhancement of osteogenic differentiation of hBM-MSCs1 and 10 µM
[29]Increasing ALP activity, mRNA, and protein expression levels of COL1, RUNX2, OPN, and OSXhPDLCsTranscriptional changes (qRT-PCR, after 7-day treatment):
RUNX2, COL1, OSX, and OPN mRNA levels increased significantly at 4
to 8 µM of EGCG
RUNX2, COL1, and OSX mRNA peaked at 6 µM; OPN peaked at 8 µM
Described as a remarkable increase compared to control
Protein changes (Western blot, after
14 days of treatment): RUNX2 protein significantly increased only at 4 µM
Solvent: EGCG dissolved in distilled water to prepare a stock solution, diluted in prewarmed growth or osteogenic differentiation medium before use
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium (α-MEM, FBS, antibiotics) supplemented with L-ascorbic acid, dexamethasone, β-glycerophosphate; medium renewed every 3 days
Promoting hPDLC
osteogenesis
4 and 6 µM
Abbreviations: ALP—alkaline phosphatase; BMP-2—bone morphogenetic protein; COL1—collagen type 1; D1—murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell line; DMSO—dimethyl sulfoxide; FBS—fetal bovine serum; hBM-MSCs—human bone marrow–mesenchymal stem cells; hMSC—human mesenchymal stem cells; hPDLCs—human periodontal ligament cells; α-MEM—minimum essential medium, alpha modification; OCN—osteocalcin; ONC—osteonectin; OPN—osteopontin; OSX–Osterix; RUNX2—runt-related transcription factor 2; SaOS-2—human osteoblast (HOB)-like cells; TNFα—tumor necrosis factor-α; VEGF—vascular endothelial growth factor.
Table 3. EGCG influence on Osterix expression.
Table 3. EGCG influence on Osterix expression.
Ref.Effects in CytobiochemistryCell LineFunctional Changes and
Methodology
Cell Culture Data
InfluenceEGCG Conc.
[26]Increasing the expression of osteogenic genes and elevating ALP activityD1Transcriptional changes
(semi-quantitative RT-PCR): Osx mRNA increased by 66%
(1 µM) and 137% (10 µM)
Solvent: EGCG dissolved in DMSO stock, diluted in culture medium before use
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured in DMEM, FBS, sodium ascorbate, and antibiotics; β-glycerophosphate for ALP
and mineralisation assays
Stimulating mineralization1–10 µM
[29]Increasing ALP activity and mRNA and protein expression levels of COL1, RUNX2, OPN, and OSXhPDLCsTranscriptional changes: RUNX2, COL1, and OSX mRNA expression increased significantly with 4–8 μM of EGCG, peaking at 6 μM for RUNX2, COL1, and OSX
Protein expression changes (Western blot): OPN and OSX proteins upregulated at 6 μM
of EGCG; 10 μM of EGCG decreased the OSX protein compared to control
Solvent: Dissolved in distilled water as stock, diluted in culture medium before use
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium containing α-MEM, FBS, antibiotics, L-ascorbic acid, dexamethasone, β-glycerophosphate
Promoting hPDLC osteogenesis4 and 6 µM
[33]Increasing ALP activity/mineralisation and increasing the expression of the RUNX2 and OSXhBM-MSCsTranscriptional changes:
TNFα (1–20 ng/mL) dose-dependently decreased Runx2 and Osx expression up to
~20% at 5 ng/mL more
at higher doses; EGCG
(5 and 10 μM) reversed
TNFα-induced suppression
of Runx2 and Osx mRNA expression at day 16
Solvent: EGCG used at specified micromolar concentrations diluted in culture/differentiation media
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells induced to differentiate using osteogenic medium containing β-glycerol phosphate, dexamethasone, L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate
Preventing TNFα inhibition of survival and osteogenic differentiation of human hBM-MSCs (at low conc. of EGCG)5 µM
Abbreviations: ALP—alkaline phosphatase; COL1—collagen type 1; D1—murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell line; DMSO—dimethyl sulfoxide; FBS—fetal bovine serum; hBM-MSCs—human bone marrow–mesenchymal stem cells; hPDLCs—human periodontal ligament cells; α-MEM—minimum essential medium, alpha modification; OPN—osteoponin; OSX—Osterix; RT-PCR—real-time PCR; RUNX2—runt-related transcription factor 2; TNFα—tumour necrosis factor α.
Table 4. EGCG influence on the expression of BMP-2.
Table 4. EGCG influence on the expression of BMP-2.
Ref.Effects in CytobiochemistryCell Line/AnimalFunctional Changes and
Methodology
Cell Culture Data
InfluenceEGCG Conc.
[35]Attenuation of oestrogen deficiency induced decreases in BMD, BV/TV, TbTh, and TbN in the proximal tibia, an increase in TbSp in the proximal tibia, and
an increase in BV/TV and TbTh in L3, increasing the synthesis of BMP-2
12-week-old female Sprague–Dawley ovariectomy-induced osteopenic ratsProtein changes: Immunohistochemistry for BMP-2 expression in proximal tibial trabecular bone showed
An increase from 31% positive area
in the OVX group to 53% in OVX with the 10 mg/kg/day of EGCG group (approximately 70% relative increase)
Solvent: EGCG administered intraperitoneally, dissolved appropriately for injection
Osteogenic substrate/status: N/A (in vivo bone tissue analysis post-treatment)
Mitigation of bone loss and improvement in bone microarchitecture10 µM, 3.4 mg/kg/day
[31]Increasing the expression of BMP-2 (EGCG with
osteoinductive agents)
hBM-MSCsProtein changes (immunohistochemistry):
BMP-2 protein expression
increased dose-dependently with EGCG treatment, visible at days
7, 14, and 21, but less than positive control
Solvent: EGCG dissolved in DMSO stock; later culture medium
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured either in pure culture medium (no osteogenic supplements) or osteogenesis-induced medium (positive control: α-MEM, FBS, ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate, dexamethasone)
Increasing the osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs5 µM
[32]Increasing the expression of RUNX2, BMP-2, and VEGFhMSCsIntracellular signalling genes Bmp-2 and Vegf were significantly upregulated by stretch, further enhanced synergistically by stretch with EGCG; TGF-β1 also increased with stretch and stretch with EGCGSolvent: EGCG added directly to culture medium (DMEM-LG, FBS)
Osteogenic substrate/status: Basal culture medium only; no osteogenic supplements used
Acceleration of osteogenic differentiation25 µM
[41]Increasing the expression of BMP-2, RUNX2, ALP, ONC, and OCN mRNA as well as ALP activity and mineralizationhBM-MSCsTranscriptional changes (qPCR):
Bmp-2 mRNA increased ~459%
(1 µM) and 502% (10 µM) at 48 h
Solvent: EGCG stock dissolved in DMSO, diluted in culture medium before use
Osteogenic substrate/status: Cells cultured in DMEM, β-glycerophosphate
Enhancement of osteogenic differentiation of hBM-MSCs1 and 10 µM
[21]Increasing the expression of BMP-2 and enhancing bone callus formationRight tibial bones of ratsKey molecular/protein changes:
BMP-2 protein expression (IHC)
in callus tissue increased with
EGCG treatment
Solvent: DMSO
Osteogenic substrate/status: Local percutaneous injection at fracture site
Facilitating the healing of fractures of the tibia10 µM, 0.52 µg/kg in total
Abbreviations: ALP—alkaline phosphatase; BMP-2—bone morphogenetic protein 2; COL1—collagen type 1; D1—murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell line; DMEM—dulbecco’s modified eagle medium, low glucose; DMSO—dimethyl sulfoxide; FBS—fetal bovine serum; hBM-MSCs—human bone marrow–mesenchymal stem cells; hMSCs—human mesenchymal stem cells; α-MEM—minimum essential medium, alpha modification; OCN—osteocalcin; ONC—osteonectin; RUNX2—runt-related transcription factor 2; TNFα—tumour necrosis factor- α; VEGF—vascular endothelial growth factor.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wróbel, P.; Czarczynska-Goslinska, B.; Chornovolenko, K.; Liwarska, J.; Kubiak, J.; Koczorowski, T.; Malinska, A.; Goslinski, T.; Waszyk-Nowaczyk, M. Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-O-Gallate on Bone Health. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8182. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158182

AMA Style

Wróbel P, Czarczynska-Goslinska B, Chornovolenko K, Liwarska J, Kubiak J, Koczorowski T, Malinska A, Goslinski T, Waszyk-Nowaczyk M. Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-O-Gallate on Bone Health. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(15):8182. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wróbel, Patrycja, Beata Czarczynska-Goslinska, Kyrylo Chornovolenko, Julia Liwarska, Jakub Kubiak, Tomasz Koczorowski, Agnieszka Malinska, Tomasz Goslinski, and Magdalena Waszyk-Nowaczyk. 2025. "Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-O-Gallate on Bone Health" Applied Sciences 15, no. 15: 8182. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158182

APA Style

Wróbel, P., Czarczynska-Goslinska, B., Chornovolenko, K., Liwarska, J., Kubiak, J., Koczorowski, T., Malinska, A., Goslinski, T., & Waszyk-Nowaczyk, M. (2025). Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-O-Gallate on Bone Health. Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8182. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158182

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop