This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
A Comparison of Segmentation Methods for Semantic OctoMap Generation
Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence, Poznan University of Technology, pl. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(13), 7285; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137285 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 June 2025
/
Revised: 21 June 2025
/
Accepted: 26 June 2025
/
Published: 27 June 2025
Abstract
Semantic mapping plays a critical role in enabling autonomous vehicles to understand and navigate complex environments. Instead of computationally demanding 3D segmentation of point clouds, we propose efficient segmentation on RGB images and projection of the corresponding LIDAR measurements on the semantic OctoMap. This study presents a comparative evaluation of different semantic segmentation methods and examines the impact of input image resolution on the accuracy of 3D semantic environment reconstruction, inference time, and computational resource usage. The experiments were conducted using an ROS 2-based pipeline that combines RGB images and LiDAR point clouds. Semantic segmentation is performed using ONNX-exported deep neural networks, with class predictions projected onto corresponding 3D LiDAR data using calibrated extrinsic. The resulting semantically annotated point clouds are fused into a probabilistic 3D representation using an OctoMap, where each voxel stores both occupancy and semantic class information. Multiple encoder–decoder architectures with various backbone configurations are evaluated in terms of segmentation quality, latency, memory footprint, and GPU utilization. Furthermore, a comparison between high and low image resolutions is conducted to assess trade-offs between model accuracy and real-time applicability.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Czajka, M.; Krupka, M.; Kubacka, D.; Janiszewski, M.R.; Belter, D.
A Comparison of Segmentation Methods for Semantic OctoMap Generation. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7285.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137285
AMA Style
Czajka M, Krupka M, Kubacka D, Janiszewski MR, Belter D.
A Comparison of Segmentation Methods for Semantic OctoMap Generation. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(13):7285.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137285
Chicago/Turabian Style
Czajka, Marcin, Maciej Krupka, Daria Kubacka, Michał Remigiusz Janiszewski, and Dominik Belter.
2025. "A Comparison of Segmentation Methods for Semantic OctoMap Generation" Applied Sciences 15, no. 13: 7285.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137285
APA Style
Czajka, M., Krupka, M., Kubacka, D., Janiszewski, M. R., & Belter, D.
(2025). A Comparison of Segmentation Methods for Semantic OctoMap Generation. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 7285.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137285
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.