Noise Annoyance in Physical Sciences: Perspective 2015–2024
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Selection
- A total of 127 records qualified for further analysis, encompassing the following research areas: Earth and Planetary Sciences (EART), Energy (ENER), Engineering (ENGI), and Environmental Science (ENVI). This selection was driven by the focus of this review on the physical sciences’ perspective of noise annoyance, aiming to synthesize literature directly addressing the physical aspects, sources, and technological interventions related to noise. While we acknowledge that fields like medicine and social sciences offer valuable insights into the health and societal impacts of noise, their exclusion was a deliberate choice to maintain a focused analysis on the physical science domain (e.g., like medicine and social sciences). Future research could benefit from integrating findings from these excluded fields to provide a more holistic understanding of noise annoyance.
- A total of 833 records were excluded, originating from research areas such as Health Sciences (Medicine (MEDI), Nursing (NURS), Veterinary Medicine (VETE), Dentistry (DENT), Health Professions (HEAL)); Life Sciences (Agricultural and Biological Sciences (AGRI), Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology (BIOC), Immunology and Microbiology (IMMU), Neuroscience (NEUR), Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy (PHAR)); Physical Sciences (Chemical Engineering (CENG), Chemistry (CHEM), Computer Science (COMP), Materials Science (MATE), Mathematics (MATH), Physics and Astronomy (PHYS)); Social Sciences (Arts and Humanities (ARTS), Business, Management, and Accounting (BUSI), Decision Sciences (DECI), Economics, Econometrics, and Finance (ECON), Psychology (PSYC), Social Sciences (SOCI)).
2.2. Data Analysis
- Subject area—EART, ENER, ENGI, ENVI. These research areas result from the selection of articles. Research interests were located in the area of Physical Sciences limited to technical issues.
- Noise source—the surveyed articles referred to the following sources of sound: Renewable Energy, Air Transport, Rail Transport, Road Transport, Urban Noise. Regarding Renewable Energy, the category encompasses sources of energy that are naturally replenished. The following noise sources that comprise this category occurred in the articles concerning Wind Farm, Wind Power, Wind Turbine, Wind Turbine Noise, Wind Turbines, Wind Energy, Wind Projects, Wind Turbine Annoyance Assessment, and Wind Turbine Sounds. Another highlighted category was Air Transport, which refers to all modes of transportation that occur above the ground, primarily using aircraft. The articles featuring the following noise sources that make up this category are on Aircraft, Aircraft Noise, Aircraft Landing, Airport, Airports, Air Traffics, Air Traffic Control, Aviation, and Aeroacoustics. Another category highlighted was Rail Transportation, which refers to transportation that occurs on rails, primarily using trains. The following articles featured the following noise sources that make up this category: Railroad Railroads, Railway Transport, and Railroad Transportation. Another category highlighted was Road Transport, which refers to all modes of transportation that occur on roads, including cars, buses, and trucks. The following articles featured the following noise sources that make up this category: Traffic Noise, Road Traffic, Roads and Streets, Road Traffic Noise, Traffic, Traffic Emission, Road Transportation, Transportation System, Vehicles, Noise, and Transportation. Another category highlighted was Urban Noise, which refers to all noise generated within urban environments, including residential, commercial, and industrial areas. The following articles featured the following noise sources that make up this category: Neighborhood, Urban Area, City, Cities, Urban Planning, Urban Environments, Urban Air, Residential Areas, and Housing. In order to better present the breakdowns of the first two categories, they are presented graphically in Figure 2.
- Affiliation—the country of affiliation of the authors was taken into account. In the case of the occurrence of more than one author, all countries were noted. For example, if 2 authors were from Poland and 1 from France, then the category was marked as Poland, France. Based on the analysis of the texts, the following authors’ affiliations were noted: China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Malaysia, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, Other (category Other means that the country occurred only once).
- Methodology—on the basis of text analysis, the following research methods were distinguished: experiment, survey, literature analysis, case study, and conceptual. For the purpose of the article, a manual qualification was made on the basis of abstracts and content of articles. Experiment was considered as an issue in which researchers independently measured noise. Survey meant a survey technique, but provided that the researchers independently conducted the survey. Literature analysis was assigned to articles that were based on literature or already published surveys or studies. Case study meant a description of the development and implementation of a particular solution to a problem. Analysis of data from a specific cohort (SAPALDIA) was also treated as a case study, especially in the context of long-term monitoring of participants. Conceptual worksheets meant developing a model (e.g., using linear regression), or developing a theoretical concept.
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- No publication was noted in the Energy category and in the Rail Transport subcategory. Likewise, no publication was noted in the Earth and Planetary Sciences category in the areas of Rail Transport and Renewable Energy. Thus, Rail Transport in Energy and Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Renewable Energy in Earth and Planetary Sciences should be considered as potential research areas that need to be completed.
- A review of the literature revealed the following sources of sound: Renewable Energy, Air Transport, Rail Transport, Road Transport, and Urban Noise. However, it should be noted that these are not the only possible sources generating sound waves that can be treated as pollution. The listed noise sources appear to generate most of the disturbance; however, it is advisable to undertake research on sources not included in the list.
- It is advisable to expand the contextual definition of noise. Context determines which sounds will be considered undesirable. In particular, sound engineering issues indicate that noise should be equated with a disturbance relevant to the measurement result, but not subjective human perception. No publications of this type have been reported.
- Trends were observed in the distribution of interest in individual research topics. There was a marked increase in interest in the areas of Engineering (66.67% increase), Air Transport (19.04% increase), an increase in the frequency of use of the experimental method (28.12% increase) and an increase in the percentage of scientific articles (14.71% increase), and an increased number of affiliations of authors from China during the period (150% increase relative to 2015–2019).
- The largest in the distribution of interest in individual research topics was noted in Earth and Planetary Sciences (decrease of 50%) Road Transport (21.87%), a decrease in interest in conceptual papers (decrease of 16.21%), and a reduced number of affiliations of authors from Germany (decrease of 45.45%).
- In the field of the contextual perception of noise, it would be recommended to conduct research on changes in noise perception by using contextual changes. The noted studies indicate a contextual dependence of perception, but it seems that further research in that field may reveal additional contextual and extra-contextual factors shaping sound perception.
- In terms of renewable sources as sound-generating factors, wind turbines were the dominant issue. Taking into account the development of renewable energy technologies, including photovoltaic panels, hydrogenic energy, or geothermal energy, it is worth investigating the spectra of ultrasound and infrasound generated by the associated equipment.
- It is recommended to develop research on noise annoyance by modeling and simulation. A review of the literature notes a relatively small percentage of such studies. Due to the safe (conducted under controlled conditions) nature of this type of research, it allows for non-invasive testing of hypotheses.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, Y.; Huang, L.; Gou, T. Applications and Advances of Artificial Intelligence in Music Generation: A Review. 2024. Available online: https://arxiv.org/html/2409.03715v1 (accessed on 16 May 2025).
- Stanovská, M.; Tomášková, H.; Šlachtová, H.; Potužníková, D.; Argalášová, L. Health Impact of Environmental and Industrial Noise—A Narrative Review. Med. Pr. Work. Health Saf. 2024, 75, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The Health Effects of Transport Noise and Implications for Future Health Risk Assessments (Signal). Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/european-zero-pollution-dashboards/indicators/the-health-effects-of-transport-noise-and-implications-for-future-health-risk-assessments-signal (accessed on 16 May 2025).
- Gong, X.; Fenech, B.; Blackmore, C.; Chen, Y.; Rodgers, G.; Gulliver, J.; Hansell, A.L. Association between Noise Annoyance and Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rubino, C.; Liuzzi, S.; Fusaro, G.; Martellotta, F.; Scrosati, C.; Garai, M. Balancing ventilation and sound insulation in windows by means of metamaterials: A review of the state of the art. Build. Environ. 2025, 275, 112780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- How EVs Are Transforming Urban Soundscapes|GEODIS. Available online: https://geodis.com/blog/sustainable-logistics-and-decarbonation/how-evs-are-transforming-urban-soundscapes (accessed on 16 May 2025).
- Fusaro, G.; Barbaresi, L.; Guidorzi, P.; Garai, M. Investigation of the sound insulation and natural ventilation performance of a metamaterial-based open window. Build. Environ. 2024, 266, 112140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fusaro, G.; Garai, M. Acoustic Requalification of an Urban Evolving Site and Design of a Noise Barrier: A Case Study at the Bologna Engineering School. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Asmar, A.M. Assessment of Noise Pollution and Specific Mitigation Measures to Reduce It in Educational Settings and Its Impact on Students’ Academic Performance: A Review. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2025, 25, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayu, S.K. A Global Bibliometric Analysis of Hearing Loss in Ship’s Crew (2015–2024): Trends and Challenges. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci. 2025, 23, 5384–5389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilk-Jakubowski, G.; Harabin, R.; Ivanov, S. Robotics in Crisis Management: A Review. Technol. Soc. 2022, 68, 101935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, S.; Gretzel, U.; Berezina, K.; Sigala, M.; Webster, C. Progress on robotics in hospitality and tourism: A review of the literature. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2019, 10, 489–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casali, J.G. Sound and Noise: Measurement and Design Guidance. In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 459–493. [Google Scholar]
- Luz, G.A. Noise Management: International Regulations. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 673–682. [Google Scholar]
- Can, A. Noise Pollution Indicators. In Environmental Indicators; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 509–513. [Google Scholar]
- Wszołek, T.; Mleczko, D.; Pawlik, P.; Kłaczyński, M.; Małecki, P.; Stępień, B. Experimental Verification of the Usefulness of Selected Infrasound and Low-Frequency Noise (ILFN) Indicators in Assessing the Noise Annoyance of Wind Turbines. Vib. Phys. Syst. 2022, 33, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aladdin, M.F.; Jalil, N.A.A.; Guan, N.Y.; Rezali, K.A.M.; Adam, S.A. Evaluation of Human Discomfort from Combined Noise and Whole-Body Vibration in Passenger Vehicle. Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng. 2019, 16, 6808–6824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brink, M.; Schäffer, B.; Vienneau, D.; Foraster, M.; Pieren, R.; Eze, I.C.; Cajochen, C.; Probst-Hensch, N.; Röösli, M.; Wunderli, J.-M. A Survey on Exposure-Response Relationships for Road, Rail, and Aircraft Noise Annoyance: Differences between Continuous and Intermittent Noise. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paiva, K.M.; Cardoso, M.R.A.; Zannin, P.H.T. Exposure to Road Traffic Noise: Annoyance, Perception and Associated Factors among Brazil’s Adult Population. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 978–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gille, L.-A.; Marquis-Favre, C.; Morel, J. Testing of the European Union Exposure-Response Relationships and Annoyance Equivalents Model for Annoyance Due to Transportation Noises: The Need of Revised Exposure-Response Relationships and Annoyance Equivalents Model. Environ. Int. 2016, 94, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radun, J.; Maula, H.; Saarinen, P.; Keränen, J.; Alakoivu, R.; Hongisto, V. Health Effects of Wind Turbine Noise and Road Traffic Noise on People Living near Wind Turbines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 112040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zou, C.; Li, Q.; Luo, Y. Assessment of Ventilation Noise Impact from Metro Depot with Over-Track Platform Structure on Workers and Nearby Inhabitants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 9203–9218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerletti, P.; Eze, I.C.; Schaffner, E.; Foraster, M.; Viennau, D.; Cajochen, C.; Wunderli, J.-M.; Röösli, M.; Stolz, D.; Pons, M.; et al. The Independent Association of Source-Specific Transportation Noise Exposure, Noise Annoyance and Noise Sensitivity with Health-Related Quality of Life. Environ. Int. 2020, 143, 105960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Hu, Z.; Zou, C. Noise Annoyance and Vibration Perception Assessment on Passengers during Train Operation in Guangzhou Metro. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 4246–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, S.K.; Kumaraswamidhas, L.A.; Kamal, M.; Rehman, M. A Hybrid Deep Leaning Model for Prediction and Parametric Sensitivity Analysis of Noise Annoyance. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 49666–49684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Harthy, I.; Amoatey, P.; Al-Mamun, A.; Alabri, Z.; Baawain, M.S. Assessment of Noise Levels and Induced Annoyance in Nearby Residential Areas of an Airport Region in Oman. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 45596–45608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Darus, N.; Haron, Z.; Yahya, K.; Abd Halil, M.H.; Norudin, W.M.A.; Othman, M.H.; Hezmi, M.A. Impulsivity of Noise Due to Single Lightweight Vehicles Transit on Transverse Rumble Strip. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil & Environmental Engineering (CENVIRON 2017), Penang, Malaysia, 28–29 November 2017; Volume 34. [Google Scholar]
- Waye, K.P. Effects of Low Frequency Noise and Vibrations: Environmental and Occupational Perspectives. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 264–277. [Google Scholar]
- Panulinova, E.; Harabinova, S. Noise annoyance from tram traffic in the urban environment. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2022, 18, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paszkowski, W. Advanced Methods of Acoustic Signal Analysis in Assessing Noise Annoyance in an Urbanized Environment. SGEM 2018, 18, 481–488. [Google Scholar]
- Radosz, J. Psychoacoustic Metrics in the Psychological Diagnosis of Noise Annoyance. Vib. Phys. Syst. 2023, 34, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, A.; Mukherjee, A.K.; Roy, S.K.; Das, S. Assessment of Noise Levels at Renovation Site, Eastern India. Indian J. Environ. Prot. 2016, 36, 124–130. [Google Scholar]
- Purwanto, B. Potential Noise Annoyance from Ambient Air Quality Measurement Using High Volume Air Sampler (HVAS). In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 21 September 2021; Volume 909. [Google Scholar]
- Zaiton, H.; Khairulzan, Y.; Nadirah, D.; Nordiana, M.; Muhammad Azril, H.; Rosiah, A.S.; Abdul Mutalif, A.H.; Wan Mohammad Asyraf, N.; Muhammad Habab, A.H.; Zanariah, J.; et al. Noise Annoyance Produced by Commercial Vehicles Transit on Rumble Strips. E3S Web Conf. 2018, 34, 02023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maula, H.; Hongisto, V.; Saarinen, P. Noise Annoyance from Road Traffic in Finland. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality & Climate (ISIAQ), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 22–27 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Yadav, A.; Parida, M.; Choudhary, P.; Kumar, B. Analysis of Traffic Noise Annoyance at Intersections in Mid-Sized Indian Cities; Springer: Singapore, 2024; Volume 551 LNCE, pp. 473–484. [Google Scholar]
- Siwapathomchai, N.; Aimyong, N.; Patthanaissaranukool, W.; Sihabut, T. Factors Affecting Traffic Noise and Annoyance from Different Types of Roads: A Case Study in Nakorn Pathom Province, Thailand. Environ. Nat. Resour. J. 2023, 21, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rey Gozalo, G.; Barrigón Morillas, J.M.; Montes González, D.; Atanasio Moraga, P. Relationships among Satisfaction, Noise Perception, and Use of Urban Green Spaces. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 438–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schäffer, B.; Brink, M.; Schlatter, F.; Vienneau, D.; Wunderli, J.M. Residential Green Is Associated with Reduced Annoyance to Road Traffic and Railway Noise but Increased Annoyance to Aircraft Noise Exposure. Environ. Int. 2020, 143, 105885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzhambov, A.M. More Residential Greenspace Is Associated with Lower Noise Annoyance: Results from a Quantitative Synthesis of the Literature. In Traffic Noise: Exposure, Health Effects and Mitigation; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 77–104. [Google Scholar]
- Nadri, F.; Mousavifard, Z.; Mohseni, S.M.S.; Nadri, H.; Tardideh, E. Investigation of Noise Annoyance and Audiometric Results of Tehran Subway Workers and Their Relation to Noise Exposure. J. Air Pollut. Health 2023, 8, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klatte, M.; Spilski, J.; Mayerl, J.; Möhler, U.; Lachmann, T.; Bergström, K. Effects of Aircraft Noise on Reading and Quality of Life in Primary School Children in Germany: Results From the NORAH Study. Environ. Behav. 2017, 49, 390–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brink, M.; Mathieu, S.; Rüttener, S. Lowering Urban Speed Limits to 30 Km/h Reduces Noise Annoyance and Shifts Exposure–Response Relationships: Evidence from a Field Study in Zurich. Environ. Int. 2022, 170, 107651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amoatey, P.; Al-Harthy, I.; Al-Mushaifari, M.A.; Al-Jabri, K.; Al-Mamun, A. Effect of Ambient Noise on Indoor Environments in a Health Care Facility in Oman. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 15081–15097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Argalasova, L.; Mihalcik, L.; Pultznerova, A.; Simonovic, J.; Matejakova, L.; Samohyl, M.; Hirosova, K.; Babjakova, J.; Jurkovicova, J. Noise annoyance and sleep disturbance in new buildings in bratislava. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2022, 18, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argalasova, L.; Kimakova, T.; Panulinova, E.; Filova, A.; Pultznerova, A.; Jurkovicova, J. Sleep Disturbance and Noise Annoyance and Environmental Noise Exposure in Residents of Two Major Slovakian Cities. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2021, 17, 690–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasco, L.; Clavel, C.; Asensio, C.; de Arcas, G. Beyond Sound Level Monitoring: Exploitation of Social Media to Gather Citizens Subjective Response to Noise. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 658, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoatey, P.; Al-Harthy, I.; Al-Jabri, K.; Al-Mamun, A.; Baawain, M.S.; Al-Mayahi, A. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Aircraft Noise Levels, Annoyance, and Health Effects in an Urban Area in Oman. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 23407–23418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdul Mutalib, N.H.; Mashros, N.; Aminudin, E.; Zakaria, R.; Haron, Z.; Abd Talib, M.H.; Abdul Hamid, A.R. Disturbance of Traffic Noise: Evaluation on the Effects and Management on Road Corridors. In IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science; IOP: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 143. [Google Scholar]
- Sahai, A.K.; Snellen, M.; Simons, D.G. Objective Quantification of Perceived Differences between Measured and Synthesized Aircraft Sounds. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2018, 72, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pleban, D.; Szczepański, G.; Kapica, Ł.; Alikowski, A.; Łada, K.; Włudarczyk, A. Subjective Assessment of Wind Turbine Noise Annoyance—Tests in Laboratory Conditions. Vib. Phys. Syst. 2023, 34, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barros, A.; Kampen, J.K.; Vuye, C. Noise Barriers as a Mitigation Measure for Highway Traffic Noise: Empirical Evidence from Three Study Cases. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 367, 121963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oiamo, T.H.; Baxter, J.; Grgicak-Mannion, A.; Xu, X.; Luginaah, I.N. Place Effects on Noise Annoyance: Cumulative Exposures, Odour Annoyance and Noise Sensitivity as Mediators of Environmental Context. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 116, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klæboe, R. Noise and Health: Annoyance and Interference. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 661–672. [Google Scholar]
- Benocci, R.; Muchetti, S.S.; Salvi, D.; Angelini, F.; Brambilla, G.; Zambon, G. Spatial Analysis and Temporal Trend of Registered Noise Complaints in the City of Milan, Italy. Int. J. Mech. 2020, 14, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aalmoes, R.; De Bruijn, B.; Sieben, N. The Influence of Contextual Non-Auditory Factors on Drone Sound Perception. In Proceedings of the Noise and Vibration Conference & Exhibition, Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 15–18 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Stansfeld, S.; Clark, C. Mental Health Effects of Noise. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 287–294. [Google Scholar]
- Okokon, E.O.; Yli-Tuomi, T.; Turunen, A.W.; Tiittanen, P.; Juutilainen, J.; Lanki, T. Traffic Noise, Noise Annoyance and Psychotropic Medication Use. Environ. Int. 2018, 119, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pohl, J.; Gabriel, J.; Hübner, G. Understanding Stress Effects of Wind Turbine Noise—The Integrated Approach. Energy Policy 2018, 112, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hübner, G.; Pohl, J.; Hoen, B.; Firestone, J.; Rand, J.; Elliott, D.; Haac, R. Monitoring Annoyance and Stress Effects of Wind Turbines on Nearby Residents: A Comparison of U.S. and European Samples. Environ. Int. 2019, 132, 105090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, F.J.Y.; Leschinger, V.; Hübner, G.; Pohl, J. Understanding Subjective and Situational Factors of Wind Turbine Noise Annoyance. Energy Policy 2023, 173, 113361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azhdari, S.S.; Yunesian, M.; Hassanvand, M.S.; Nodehi, R.N.; Darvishali, S.; Faridi, S.; Shamsipour, M. Associations of Combined Short-Term Exposures to Ambient PM2.5 Air Pollution and Noise Annoyance on Mental Health Disorders: A Panel Study of Healthy College Students in Tehran. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2022, 15, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stansfeld, S.A.; Shipley, M. Noise Sensitivity and Future Risk of Illness and Mortality. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 520, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khomenko, S.; Cirach, M.; Barrera-Gómez, J.; Pereira-Barboza, E.; Iungman, T.; Mueller, N.; Foraster, M.; Tonne, C.; Thondoo, M.; Jephcote, C.; et al. Impact of Road Traffic Noise on Annoyance and Preventable Mortality in European Cities: A Health Impact Assessment. Environ. Int. 2022, 162, 107160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eze, I.C.; Foraster, M.; Schaffner, E.; Vienneau, D.; Pieren, R.; Imboden, M.; Wunderli, J.-M.; Cajochen, C.; Brink, M.; Röösli, M.; et al. Incidence of Depression in Relation to Transportation Noise Exposure and Noise Annoyance in the SAPALDIA Study. Environ. Int. 2020, 144, 106014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieren, R.; Bertsch, L.; Lauper, D.; Schäffer, B. Improving Future Low-Noise Aircraft Technologies Using Experimental Perception-Based Evaluation of Synthetic Flyovers. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 692, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzhambov, A.; Tilov, B.; Markevych, I.; Dimitrova, D. Residential Road Traffic Noise and General Mental Health in Youth: The Role of Noise Annoyance, Neighborhood Restorative Quality, Physical Activity, and Social Cohesion as Potential Mediators. Environ. Int. 2017, 109, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fuda, S.; Aletta, F.; Kang, J.; Astolfi, A. Sound Perception of Different Materials for the Footpaths of Urban Parks. Energy Procedia 2015, 78, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foraster, M.; Eze, I.C.; Vienneau, D.; Brink, M.; Cajochen, C.; Caviezel, S.; Héritier, H.; Schaffner, E.; Schindler, C.; Wanner, M.; et al. Long-Term Transportation Noise Annoyance Is Associated with Subsequent Lower Levels of Physical Activity. Environ. Int. 2016, 91, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pitchika, A.; Hampel, R.; Wolf, K.; Kraus, U.; Cyrys, J.; Babisch, W.; Peters, A.; Schneider, A. Long-Term Associations of Modeled and Self-Reported Measures of Exposure to Air Pollution and Noise at Residence on Prevalent Hypertension and Blood Pressure. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 593–594, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, P.J.; Park, S.H.; Jeong, J.H.; Choung, T.; Kim, K.Y. Association between Transportation Noise and Blood Pressure in Adults Living in Multi-Storey Residential Buildings. Environ. Int. 2019, 132, 105101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lefèvre, M.; Chaumond, A.; Champelovier, P.; Giorgis Allemand, L.; Lambert, J.; Laumon, B.; Evrard, A.-S. Understanding the Relationship between Air Traffic Noise Exposure and Annoyance in Populations Living near Airports in France. Environ. Int. 2020, 144, 106058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantuaria, M.L.; Brandt, J.; Løfstrøm, P.; Blanes-Vidal, V. Public Perception of Rural Environmental Quality: Moving towards a Multi-Pollutant Approach. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 170, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Li, H.; Liu, C.; Li, M.; Zou, J. Noise Exposure of Residential Areas along LRT Lines in a Mountainous City. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 568, 1283–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massonnié, J.; Frasseto, P.; Mareschal, D.; Kirkham, N.Z. Learning in Noisy Classrooms: Children’s Reports of Annoyance and Distraction from Noise Are Associated with Individual Differences in Mind-Wandering and Switching Skills. Environ. Behav. 2022, 54, 58–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoatey, P.; Al-Harthy, I.; Amankona, D.; Douban, S.; Izady, A.; Chen, M.; Al-Jabri, K.; Al-Alawi, M. Contribution of Outdoor Noise-Induced Health Risk in Schools Located in Urbanized Arid Country. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 48107–48119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fredianelli, L.; Carpita, S.; Licitra, G. A Procedure for Deriving Wind Turbine Noise Limits by Taking into Account Annoyance. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 648, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flanagan, E.; Malmqvist, E.; Oudin, A.; Sunde Persson, K.; Alkan Ohlsson, J.; Mattisson, K. Health Impact Assessment of Road Traffic Noise Exposure Based on Different Densification Scenarios in Malmö, Sweden. Environ. Int. 2023, 174, 107867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eze, I.C.; Foraster, M.; Schaffner, E.; Vienneau, D.; Héritier, H.; Pieren, R.; Thiesse, L.; Rudzik, F.; Rothe, T.; Pons, M.; et al. Transportation Noise Exposure, Noise Annoyance and Respiratory Health in Adults: A Repeated-Measures Study. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, Z.; Liu, H.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xu, F.; Jiang, C.; Yu, X.; Wu, G. Machine Learning Noise Exposure Detection of Rail Transit Drivers Using Heart Rate Variability. Transp. Saf. Environ. 2024, 6, tdad028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B.; Wen, L.; Bai, J.; Chai, Y. Effect of Road and Railway Sound on Psychological and Physiological Responses in an Office Environment. Buildings 2022, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, K.; Cao, R.; Wang, Q.; Zh, P. Progress of Research on the Effects of Traffic Noise on Human Health. Glob. Nest J. 2023, 25, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilani, T.A.; Mir, M.S.; Gilani, M.I. A Study on the Impact of Road Traffic Noise Exposure on Work Efficiency of Housewives. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 57434–57447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lauper, E.; Moser, S.; Fischer, M.; Matthies, E. Explaining Car Drivers’ Intention to Prevent Road-Traffic Noise: An Application of the Norm Activation Model. Environ. Behav. 2016, 48, 826–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ki, J.; Yun, S.-J.; Kim, W.-C.; Oh, S.; Ha, J.; Hwangbo, E.; Lee, H.; Shin, S.; Yoon, S.; Youn, H. Local Residents’ Attitudes about Wind Farms and Associated Noise Annoyance in South Korea. Energy Policy 2022, 163, 112847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frantál, B.; Van Der Horst, D.; Kunc, J.; Jaňurová, M. Landscape Disruption or Just a Lack of Economic Benefits? Exploring Factors behind the Negative Perceptions of Wind Turbines. J. Landsc. Ecol. 2017, 15, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, R.C. Quiet Areas and Urban Sustainability. Energy Procedia 2018, 153, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montes González, D.; Barrigón Morillas, J.M.; Rey-Gozalo, G. Effects of Noise on Pedestrians in Urban Environments Where Road Traffic Is the Main Source of Sound. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vilniškis, T.; Naimušin, A.; Januševičius, T. Investigation and modeling of transport noise dependence on traffic speed and impact on population annoyance. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2022, 30, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şentop Dümen, A.; Tamer Bayazıt, N. Enforcement of Acoustic Performance Assessment in Residential Buildings and Occupant Satisfaction. Build. Res. Inf. 2020, 48, 866–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bard, D.; Vardaxis, N.-G.; Sondergard, E. Acoustic Comfort Investigation in Residential Timber Buildings in Sweden. J. Sustain. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2019, 24, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Si, Y.; Abdul-Rahman, H.; Wood, L.C. Noise Annoyance and Loudness: Acoustic Performance of Residential Buildings in Tropics. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2015, 36, 680–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Mohamed, H.; Chang, J.D. The Effect of Positions of Vertical Glass Fins Inside a Double Skin Façade Air Cavity as Acoustical Barriers and Ventilation Potentials. Procedia Eng. 2016, 145, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abouel-Seoud, S.A. Active Control Analysis of Passenger Vehicle Interior Noise Produced from Tyre/Road Interaction. Int. J. Veh. Noise Vib. 2016, 12, 138–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibarra, D. Noise Attenuation of the Engine Compartment of a Vehicle. Int. J. Veh. Noise Vib. 2017, 13, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parizet, E.; Robart, R.; Pondrom, P.; Chamard, J.; Baudet, G.; Quinn, D.; Janssens, K.; Haider, M. Additional Efficient Warning Sounds for Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. In Energy and Environment; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 501–510. [Google Scholar]
- Sahai, A.K.; Snellen, M.; Simons, D.G.; Stumpf, E. Aircraft Design Optimization for Lowering Community Noise Exposure Based on Annoyance Metrics. J. Aircr. 2017, 54, 2257–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieren, R.; Le Griffon, I.; Bertsch, L.; Heusser, A.; Centracchio, F.; Weintraub, D.; Lavandier, C.; Schäffer, B. Perception-Based Noise Assessment of a Future Blended Wing Body Aircraft Concept Using Synthesized Flyovers in an Acoustic VR Environment—The ARTEM Study. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2024, 144, 108767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieren, R.; Bertsch, L.; Blinstrub, J.; Schäffer, B.; Wunderli, J.M. Simulation Process for Perception-Based Noise Optimization of Conventional and Novel Aircraft Concepts. In Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Pereda Albarrán, M.Y.; Schültke, F.; Stumpf, E. Sound Quality Assessment of Over-the-Wing Engine Configurations Applied to Continuous Descent Approaches. In Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 25–29 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Maury, C.; Bravo, T. Focussed Synthesis of a Turbulent Boundary Layer Excitation. In Proceedings of the 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Lyon, France, 30 May–1 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Dieumegard, P.; Guntzer, F.; Caillet, J.; Cafieri, S. A Realistic Rotorcraft Noise Footprint Computation for Low-Noise Trajectory Optimization. In Proceedings of the 78th Vertical Flight Society Annual Forum, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 10–12 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Kolb, A.; Mancini, S.; Rossignol, K.-S.; Ewert, R. Flap Side-Edge Noise Simulation Using Rans-Based Source Modelling. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, Virtual Event, 15–19 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Oppenheimer, C.H. Tonality Perception Lessons Learned. SAE Int. J. Adv. Curr. Prac. Mobil. 2024, 6, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar]
- Modini, S.; Graziani, G.; Bernardini, G.; Gennaretti, M. Analytical Identification of Blade-Vortex Interaction Noise Controller Suited for Miniature Trailing Edge Effectors; American Helicopter Society: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 49–56. [Google Scholar]
- Barbosa, F.C. Aircraft Emissions and Noise Review—Technological Paths for Pursuing Sustainability in the Aviation Industry; SAE: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Bocanegra, J.A.; Borelli, D.; Gaggero, T.; Rizzuto, E.; Schenone, C. Characterizing Onboard Noise in Ships: Insights from Statistical, Machine Learning and Advanced Noise Index Analyses. Ocean Eng. 2023, 285, 115273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnamurthy, S.; Rizzi, S.A. Auralization of Amplitude Modulated Helicopter Flyover Noise. In Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA, 7–11 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Guntzer, F.; Caillet, J.; Cariou, C.; Pinacho, J.-P.; Dieumegard, P.; León, E.R. A Comprehensive Helicopter Acoustic Modeling Tool Based on Simulation and Experiment. In Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 80th Annual Forum & Technology Display, Montreal, QC, Canada, 7–9 May 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Monteiro, F.D.N.; Merino-Martínez, R.; Lima Pereira, L.T. Psychoacoustic Evaluation of an Array of Distributed Propellers Under Synchrophasing Operation. In Proceedings of the 30th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (2024), Rome, Italy, 4–7 June 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Torija, A.J.; Ramos-Romero, C.; Green, N. Acoustic and Psychoacoustic Characterisation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems as a Function of Vehicle Mass and Flight Procedure. In Proceedings of the 30th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (2024), Rome, Italy, 4–7 June 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Rimjha, M.; Trani, A.; Hotle, S. Urban Air Mobility: Preliminary Noise Analysis of Commuter Operations. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2021 Forum, Virtual Event, 2–6 August 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Babetto, L.; Götz, J.; Stumpf, E. A Preliminary Acoustic Prediction Approach for Ducted Coaxial Rotors of eVTOL in UAM. In Proceedings of the AIAA AVIATION 2023 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA, 12–16 June 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer, M. Noise Footprint Assessment at a Vertiport for Different Approach and Departure Procedures of a Tilt-Wing Air-Taxi. In Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, NOISE-CON23, Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 15–18 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, K.J.; Zachos, D.; Langelaan, J.W.; Greenwood, E.; Brentner, K. Flight Path Planning for Minimization of Total Noise Exposure in Urban Air Mobility Operations. In Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Darus, N.; Haron, Z.; Bakhori, S.N.M.; Han, L.M.; Jahya, Z.; Hamid, M.F.A. Construction Noise Annoyance among the Public Residents. J. Teknol. 2015, 74, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarate, D.I.I. The Issue of Road Traffic Noise and a Probable Solution. In Traffic Noise: Exposure, Health Effects and Mitigation; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 207–244. [Google Scholar]
- Dasarathy, A.K.; Tamilselvi, M. Sound Levels at Different Zones in Chennai as a Simple Case Study for Attenuation of Noise Pollution. Pollut. Res. 2016, 35, 869–872. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, C.; Redonnet, S. Assessing the Noise Annoyances by the Air Traffic around Hong Kong International Airport. In Proceedings of the 30th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Rome, Italy, 4–7 June 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Gupta, G.; Gupta, S.H. An Exhaustive Study of Computer Simulation and Modeling for Active Noise Control. Electrica 2022, 22, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Meijden, B.; Roling, P.; Curran, R. Flexible Runway Use Modeling Using Pairwise RECAT-EU Separation Minima. In Proceedings of the 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 25–29 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Roling, P.C.; Lagerwij, S. Flexible Runway Scheduling with Non-Linear Noise Restrictions Using a Tabu Search Algorithm. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum and Ascend 2024, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 29 July–2 August 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Paszkowski, W.; Sobiech, M. The Modeling of the Acoustic Condition of Urban Environment Using Noise Annoyance Assessment. Environ. Model. Assess. 2019, 24, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graziani, S.; Petrosino, F.; Jäschke, J.; Glorioso, A.; Fusaro, R.; Viola, N. Evaluation of Sonic Boom Shock Wave Generation with CFD Methods. Aerospace 2024, 11, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loboichenko, V.; Wilk-Jakubowski, J.L.; Levterov, A.; Wilk-Jakubowski, G.; Statyvka, Y.; Shevchenko, O. Using the burning of polymer compounds to determine the applicability of the acoustic method in fire extinguishing. Polymers 2024, 16, 3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loboichenko, V.; Wilk-Jakubowski, J.; Wilk-Jakubowski, G.; Harabin, R.; Shevchenko, R.; Strelets, V.; Levterov, A.; Soshinskiy, A.; Tregub, N.; Antoshkin, O. The Use of Acoustic Effects for the Prevention and Elimination of Fires as an Element of Modern Environmental Technologies. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2022, 26, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vovchuk, T.S.; Wilk-Jakubowski, J.L.; Telelim, V.M.; Loboichenko, V.M.; Shevchenko, R.I.; Shevchenko, O.S.; Tregub, N.S. Investigation of the use of the acoustic effect in extinguishing fires of oil and petroleum products. SOCAR Proc. 2021, 2, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilk-Jakubowski, J.L.; Loboichenko, V.; Wilk-Jakubowski, G.; Yılmaz-Atay, H.; Harabin, R.; Ciosmak, J.; Ivanov, S.; Stankov, S. Acoustic Firefighting Method on the Basis of European Research: A Review: Acoustic Firefighting Method. Akustika 2023, 46, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loboichenko, V.; Wilk-Jakubowski, G.; Wilk-Jakubowski, J.L.; Ciosmak, J. Application of Low-Frequency Acoustic Waves to Extinguish Flames on the Basis of Selected Experimental Attempts. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, C.; Wang, Z.; Huang, X. Acoustic Flame Extinction by the Sound Wave or Speaker-Induced Wind? Fire Saf. J. 2021, 126, 103479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.; Tian, Z.; Lu, Y.; Ye, Q. Research Status and Progress of Acoustic Fire Extinguishing Technology. Fire 2025, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilk-Jakubowski, J.; Wilk-Jakubowski, G.; Loboichenko, V. Experimental Attempts of Using Modulated and Unmodulated Waves in Low-Frequency Acoustic Wave Flame Extinguishing Technology: A Review of Selected Cases. Stroj. Vestn.-J. Mech. Eng. 2024, 70, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negi, P.; Pathani, A.; Bhatt, B.C.; Swami, S.; Singh, R.; Gehlot, A.; Thakur, A.K.; Gupta, L.R.; Priyadarshi, N.; Twala, B.; et al. Integration of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Fire and Safety Management. Fire 2024, 7, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilk-Jakubowski, J.L.; Loboichenko, V.; Divizinyuk, M.; Wilk-Jakubowski, G.; Shevchenko, R.; Ivanov, S.; Strelets, V. Acoustic Waves and Their Application in Modern Fire Detection Using Artificial Vision Systems: A Review. Sensors 2025, 25, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, S.; Stankov, S. The Artificial Intelligence Platform with the Use of DNN to Detect Flames: A Case of Acoustic Extinguisher. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing & Optimization 2021, Hua Hin, Thailand, 30–31 December 2021; Volume 371, pp. 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azarenko, O.; Honcharenko, Y.; Divizinyuk, M.; Mirnenko, V.; Strilets, V.; Wilk-Jakubowski, J.L. The influence of air environment properties on the solution of applied problems of capturing speech information in the open terrain. Soc. Dev. Secur. 2022, 12, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azarenko, O.; Honcharenko, Y.; Divizinyuk, M.; Mirnenko, V.; Strilets, V.; Wilk-Jakubowski, J.L. Influence of anthropogenic factors on the solution of applied problems of recording language information in the open area. Soc. Dev. Secur. 2022, 12, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilk-Jakubowski, J. Total Signal Degradation of Polish 26-50 GHz Satellite Systems Due to Rain. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bocanegra, J.A.; Borelli, D.; Gaggero, T.; Rizzuto, E.; Schenon, C. A novel approach to port noise characterization using an acoustic camera. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 151903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Name | 2015–2019 | 2020–2024 | All Years | Share [%] | Chi-Square |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 56 | 56 | 112 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
Document type | |||||
Conference paper | 14 | 16 | 30 | 26.79 | χ2 = 5.92 (df = 2, p = 0.0518) |
Journal article | 34 | 39 | 73 | 65.18 | |
Book chapter | 8 | 1 | 9 | 8.04 | |
Noise source | |||||
Renewable energy | 10 | 6 | 16 | 14.29 | χ2 = 0.476 (df = 4, p = 0.975) |
Air transport | 17 | 21 | 38 | 33.93 | |
Rail transport | 6 | 7 | 13 | 11.61 | |
Road transport | 32 | 25 | 57 | 50.89 | |
Urban noise | 21 | 24 | 45 | 40.18 | |
Subject area | |||||
Environmental science | 35 | 33 | 68 | 60.71 | χ2 = 3.875 (df = 3, p = 0.275) |
Engineering | 18 | 30 | 48 | 42.86 | |
Energy | 8 | 7 | 15 | 13.39 | |
Earth and planetary sciences | 6 | 3 | 9 | 8.04 | |
Research methodology | |||||
Experiment | 32 | 41 | 73 | 65.18 | χ2 = 2.858 (df = 4, p = 0.581) |
Survey | 23 | 26 | 49 | 43.75 | |
Literature analysis | 13 | 12 | 25 | 22.32 | |
Case study | 10 | 6 | 16 | 14.29 | |
Conceptual | 37 | 31 | 68 | 60.71 |
Country | 2015–2019 | 2020–2024 | All Years | Share [%] | Chi-Square |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All countries | 56 | 56 | 112 | 100.0 | χ2 = 16.607 (df = 13, p = 0.218) |
Germany | 11 | 6 | 17 | 15.18 | |
Switzerland | 6 | 5 | 11 | 9.82 | |
France | 5 | 5 | 10 | 8.93 | |
United Kingdom | 6 | 3 | 9 | 8.04 | |
Spain | 4 | 4 | 8 | 7.14 | |
United States | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6.25 | |
China | 2 | 5 | 7 | 6.25 | |
Italy | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6.25 | |
Netherlands | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5.36 | |
India | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5.36 | |
Malaysia | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5.36 | |
Poland | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4.46 | |
Other | 13 | 20 | 33 | 29.46 |
Name | Renewable Energy | Air Transport | Rail Transport | Road Transport | Urban Noise | Total | Chi-Square |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 16 | 38 | 13 | 57 | 45 | 112 | χ2 |
Subject area | |||||||
Environmental science | 10 | 18 | 11 | 45 | 31 | 68 | χ2 = 3.387 (df = 12, p = 0.99) |
Engineering | 5 | 23 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 48 | |
Energy | 6 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | |
Earth and planetary sciences | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9 | |
Research methodology | |||||||
Experiment | 7 | 28 | 7 | 34 | 29 | 73 | χ2 = 12.352 (df = 16, p = 0.719) |
Survey | 7 | 10 | 7 | 32 | 25 | 49 | |
Literature analysis | 5 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 10 | 25 | |
Case study | 3 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 16 | |
Conceptual | 7 | 31 | 9 | 32 | 23 | 68 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wilk-Jakubowski, J.L.; Harabin, R.; Pawlik, L.; Wilk-Jakubowski, G. Noise Annoyance in Physical Sciences: Perspective 2015–2024. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6559. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126559
Wilk-Jakubowski JL, Harabin R, Pawlik L, Wilk-Jakubowski G. Noise Annoyance in Physical Sciences: Perspective 2015–2024. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(12):6559. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126559
Chicago/Turabian StyleWilk-Jakubowski, Jacek Lukasz, Radoslaw Harabin, Lukasz Pawlik, and Grzegorz Wilk-Jakubowski. 2025. "Noise Annoyance in Physical Sciences: Perspective 2015–2024" Applied Sciences 15, no. 12: 6559. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126559
APA StyleWilk-Jakubowski, J. L., Harabin, R., Pawlik, L., & Wilk-Jakubowski, G. (2025). Noise Annoyance in Physical Sciences: Perspective 2015–2024. Applied Sciences, 15(12), 6559. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126559