Next Article in Journal
Optimizing an LSTM Self-Attention Architecture for Portuguese Sentiment Analysis Using a Genetic Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
Digital Twin of the European Electricity Grid: A Review of Regulatory Barriers, Technological Challenges, and Economic Opportunities
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning-Driven Acoustic Feature Classification and Pronunciation Assessment for Mandarin Learners
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization and Machine Learning in Modeling Approaches to Hybrid Energy Balance to Improve Ports’ Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Sustainable Waste Management: A Bibliometric and Thematic Review

Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 6337; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116337
Submission received: 12 May 2025 / Revised: 29 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 5 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Holistic Approaches in Artificial Intelligence and Renewable Energy)

Abstract

Sustainable waste management is a critical challenge for ecological transitions. Emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Digital Twins (DT) offer new opportunities to optimize collection, treatment, and valorization processes, thereby promoting circular economy models. This study adopts an integrated approach to analyze the state of the art and key research trajectories related to the application of these technologies in waste management. Through a bibliometric analysis based on the Scopus database and mapping with VOSviewer (version 1.6.20), three main thematic clusters were identified: (i) predictive and environmental methods, (ii) sustainability and optimization, and (iii) monitoring and environmental impacts. A qualitative analysis of the 20 most-cited articles further revealed six major research areas, including waste forecasting, recycled materials, process digitalization, and intelligent environmental monitoring. The findings indicate a growing convergence among digitalization, automation, and sustainability. The adopted approach enables the mapping of major research directions and emerging interconnections among AI, the circular economy, and predictive management, providing an up-to-date and systemic perspective on the field.

1. Introduction

Waste management represents a complex environmental and infrastructural challenge, directly affecting the quality of life, the health of urban ecosystems, and the sustainability of production and consumption models [1,2]. Global population growth, increasing urbanization, and intensive resource consumption have led to a significant rise in waste generation, with substantial environmental and economic impacts [3,4,5].
In this context, the integration of advanced digital technologies—such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and Digital Twins (DT)—is profoundly transforming the waste sector. These technologies offer innovative tools for process optimization, real-time monitoring, and predictive modeling [6,7]. When applied across waste collection, treatment, recycling, and resource recovery (i.e., the process of extracting value from waste materials), they enable more intelligent and adaptive management of material flows, reducing environmental impact and improving service efficiency [8].
Among these, the concept of the Digital Twin, a dynamic virtual replica of a physical asset or process that continuously receives real-time data, is particularly promising and stands to support the operational management of complex systems. By creating a virtual replica of physical processes, it becomes possible to simulate scenarios, optimize decision-making, and adapt treatment and recovery systems based on environmental, logistical, and socio-economic variables [9]. This allows operators to test different management strategies virtually before applying them in the real world.
Integration with AI-based predictive models further enhances the ability to anticipate critical issues, forecast incoming waste volumes, and assess the environmental performance of different management strategies [10].
Consistent with the theoretical framework outlined, Table 1 summarizes the main conceptual constructs identified in the reviewed literature, linking them to specific thematic descriptors and relevant bibliographic references. This preliminary classification provides an interpretative map of recurring research themes, facilitating the understanding of the research directions that will be further explored in the bibliometric analysis and critical discussion.
The role of AI also emerges across various domains, including the sustainable design of recycled materials, environmental risk assessment, and intelligent environmental monitoring, understood as the use of sensor-based systems, predictive analytics, and geospatial data integration to monitor and respond to environmental conditions in real time [11]. In these areas, the adoption of deep learning models, neural networks, and geospatial analysis supports more informed, data-driven decision-making, thereby strengthening the effectiveness of environmental and urban policies [12].
Building on these premises, the present study aims to provide a systematic and up-to-date analysis of the current state of research on the application of AI and DT in sustainable waste management. The paper is structured to guide the reader through a coherent and methodologically transparent path. The adopted approach consists of a bibliometric analysis of key scientific contributions indexed in the Scopus database [12,13], followed by a thematic evaluation of the 20 most-cited articles [14,15,16,17], with the goal of identifying major conceptual clusters, emerging research lines, and perspectives for technological development.

2. Methodology

The methodology adopted, in synergy with the approach proposed by Campana et al., 2025 [18], is structured into two main phases: systematic literature selection and bibliometric analysis.
A systematic literature selection process was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, aimed at identifying the most relevant academic contributions to the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Digital Twins (DT) in the context of sustainable waste management. The Scopus database served as the primary source, and a structured set of inclusion and exclusion criteria was applied to ensure thematic coherence and the scientific rigor of the selected publications [19,20].
Scopus was chosen as the sole source for bibliographic data collection [12]. Recognized as one of the most comprehensive global information resources, Scopus covers numerous disciplines and offers high-quality academic content. For this reason, it has progressively established itself as the primary database for conducting bibliometric analyses and systematic literature reviews [13].
In the second phase, a bibliometric analysis was conducted with the support of VOSviewer software, with the aim of mapping the main research trends in the field. This included identifying emerging topics, keyword co-occurrences, and collaboration networks among authors [21].
The integration of the PRISMA-based approach with bibliometric analysis provided a systematic and up-to-date overview of the evolving research landscape on the use of AI and DT in waste management. In particular, a detailed examination of the 20 most-cited articles was conducted to highlight key contributions, prevailing theoretical models, and major future research directions.

2.1. Systematic Literature Selection and Inclusion Criteria

To ensure a systematic and reproducible analysis of the scientific literature on the application of AI and Digital Twins (DT) in sustainable waste management, an approach based on the principles of the PRISMA methodology (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) was adopted [18,19].
The bibliographic search was conducted using the Scopus database, employing an advanced search string constructed as shown in Figure 1:
The search string was constructed to incorporate key synonyms and conceptually related terms frequently used within the field. Boolean operators (OR, AND) were employed to balance breadth and precision, allowing the retrieval of a wide yet thematically consistent set of documents. As such, a single, well-structured query was deemed adequate to encompass the diversity of existing research on the topic.
The initial query, executed without any filters, returned a total of 873 documents. A temporal filter was then applied, restricting the selection to publications from 2015 to 2025 to ensure the currency and relevance of the contributions. This step did not alter the total, which remained at 873 documents.
Next, to ensure the scientific rigor and reliability of the dataset, a document-type filter was applied, limiting the analysis to peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings [22]. This reduced the dataset to 674 documents.
Subsequently, a disciplinary filter was introduced, selecting only publications within the following subject areas: Engineering, Environmental Science, Computer Science, and Materials Science—identified as central to the objectives of this study. After applying this filter, the final dataset consisted of 570 documents.
The selection procedure is summarized in the PRISMA flow diagram shown in Figure 2, which adopts the standard four-phase structure: Identification, Screening, Eligibility, and Inclusion. This framework ensures a transparent and systematic presentation of how the initial dataset was progressively filtered. A simplified overview of the applied criteria is provided in Table 2.
In the identification phase, records were collected through the application of a precisely defined Boolean query. During the screening phase, non-peer-reviewed materials were excluded. The eligibility step entailed a manual assessment of the disciplinary relevance of each document. Finally, in the inclusion phase, only those records that fully met both methodological and thematic requirements were retained for analysis [23,24].

2.2. Bibliometric Analysis

From a bibliometric standpoint, VOSviewer represents a leading tool commonly adopted for the graphical representation and examination of scientific literature networks., which include information such as titles, authors, keywords, and citations [25,26]. Thanks to its versatility, the software enables the identification of research trends, impacts, and evolutionary trajectories through the analysis of citation occurrences and keyword co-occurrences [27].
Within the scientific research landscape, VOSviewer has established itself as an essential tool for visually representing bibliometric data, enabling the recognition of research gaps and thematic concentrations within specific domains and highlighting the most influential sources and authors [28,29]. Operating primarily at an aggregated level, the software is particularly effective in cluster analysis [28].
Specifically, the clustering method available in VOSviewer version 1.6.20 was applied to recurring keywords, with each thematic group assigned a distinctive color [30]. In these visualizations, the size of the nodes (circles) reflects the frequency of keyword usage, while colors represent distinct thematic clusters. The positions along the x and y axes are not semantically significant, which means the visual layout can be rotated or flipped without affecting the interpretation of the underlying relationships [31,32].
The dataset used for this analysis was exported from the Scopus database in .CSV format, ensuring compatibility with the VOSviewer software and allowing for accurate processing of bibliographic metadata. A bibliometric map was then generated based on both author keywords and indexed keywords. To produce a meaningful and readable representation, a filter was applied to include only keywords with a minimum of three occurrences within the selected corpus of articles.
This methodology effectively highlighted the most relevant concepts and areas of the highest semantic density within the research field, providing a clear visualization of emerging terms and thematic clusters present in the scientific literature [33] concerning the use of AI and DT in sustainable waste management.

2.3. Thematic Analysis of the Top-Cited Articles

In addition to the bibliometric mapping, a qualitative thematic analysis was performed on the 20 most-cited articles identified in the corpus. Each article was reviewed in full and thematically coded using an inductive approach, guided by recurring categories such as research objective, AI/ML technique, application domain, and observed or simulated outcomes. This thematic classification was conducted following a qualitative interpretive method inspired by the principles of grounded theory [34], allowing themes to emerge directly from the content of the articles without applying a predefined taxonomy. This process enabled the identification of major research streams, which were subsequently cross-referenced with the bibliometric clusters to ensure consistency, coherence, and conceptual saturation.

3. Results

3.1. Results of Bibliometric Analysis

The bibliometric analysis performed through VOSviewer produced the network visualization presented in Figure 3.
The VOSviewer mapping organizes interconnected keywords into three distinct thematic clusters, each represented by a different color for visual clarity. These clusters represent distinct yet interconnected areas of research in the application of artificial intelligence and digital technologies to sustainable waste management.
The red cluster, located on the left and central part of the map, is strongly focused on data-driven methodologies and environmental variables. This group includes keywords such as machine learning, support vector machine, deep learning, prediction, data interpretation, and artificial neural network, indicating a clear emphasis on computational tools used to analyze and model complex waste-related phenomena. Other keywords like methane, organic matter, and environmental factors suggest a research focus on the chemical and environmental dimensions of waste treatment, particularly in contexts such as landfill emissions and organic waste decomposition.
On the other hand, the green cluster, positioned on the right side of the map, highlights research related to optimization, sustainability, and the circular economy. Key terms such as artificial intelligence, digital twin, circular economy, recycling, zero carbon, and sustainable development goals reflect a growing emphasis on integrating advanced technologies into broader sustainability frameworks. This cluster captures the role of AI and digital simulations in performance assessment, process optimization, and supporting the transition to carbon-neutral waste management strategies.
A third blue cluster, positioned toward the upper part of the map, is more concentrated around human–environment interactions. It includes keywords such as air pollution, human, and environmental monitoring, pointing to research that connects waste management with public health concerns and environmental quality. The presence of water supply within the shared areas of the clusters further suggests an interdisciplinary interest in how waste systems intersect with other resource infrastructures.
Visually, the red cluster appears dense and positioned toward the center-left of the map, indicating a high level of internal connectivity among keywords related to analytical models and algorithmic processing of waste-related data. In contrast, the green cluster is more dispersed and located on the right side of the visualization, illustrating a broader systemic perspective encompassing sustainability goals and strategic innovation. Meanwhile, the blue cluster, though smaller, adds depth by emphasizing social and environmental monitoring dimensions.
Table 3 summarizes the top 10 most frequently co-occurring keywords identified through this bibliometric analysis, reinforcing the conceptual structure illustrated in the visualization. Leading the ranking is prediction (TLS = 128), a term closely aligned with the red cluster, underscoring the prominence of forecasting techniques in waste estimation and emissions modeling. Keywords such as artificial intelligence (TLS = 119) and artificial neural network (TLS = 106) also reflect the dominance of AI-based methods across the literature. These terms, alongside machine learning and environmental management, form the analytical core of the red cluster’s emphasis on computational modeling.
Notably, recycling (TLS = 94) and waste management (TLS = 90) bridge the red and green clusters, demonstrating the integration of data-driven tools with sustainability-oriented practices. Lower-ranked but conceptually important terms like adaptation strategies and adaptation strategy (TLS = 69 and 68, respectively) suggest a growing interest in flexible, resilience-focused waste management frameworks, potentially intersecting with the blue cluster’s socio-environmental themes.
The interconnections among the clusters suggest that sustainable waste management is increasingly addressed through a multi-layered approach, combining AI-based modeling, real-time environmental monitoring, and strategic planning aligned with sustainability goals. These overlaps reveal the field’s interdisciplinary nature and underscore the relevance of digital innovation in addressing the complexity of circular and low-emission waste systems.

3.2. Scientific Journals and Geographic Distribution of Research Output

Table 4 displays the top 10 most productive journals in the field of AI-based waste management and environmental applications, ranked by total number of publications. Waste Management and the Journal of Cleaner Production lead the list with 25 publications each, reflecting their central role in disseminating research on predictive modeling, recycling technologies, and smart sustainability practices.
Other notable journals include Construction and Building Materials (18 publications) and Science of the Total Environment (17 publications), which emphasize interdisciplinary approaches to construction waste, environmental quality, and technological innovation. Sustainability (Switzerland) and the Journal of Environmental Management also feature prominently, underlining the growing relevance of AI in both theoretical and applied environmental research.
This ranking highlights the increasing visibility and cross-sectoral interest in machine learning and data-driven solutions for sustainable development. For scholars and practitioners, these journals serve as key reference points for emerging trends, case studies, and methodological advancements in smart waste and resource management.
Table 5 presents a ranking of countries based on their contributions to the literature on AI and digital technologies in waste management, measured by total number of publications (TNP), total citations (TNC), and total link strength (TLS). The data reveals a geographically diverse research landscape, with a strong presence from both developed and emerging economies.
Australia leads the ranking with 39 publications and a total link strength of 23, indicating not only a high volume of output but also robust international collaboration within the field. This is followed by Saudi Arabia (25 publications, TLS = 14) and Iran (22 publications, TLS = 18), both of which demonstrate active engagement in AI-driven environmental research, with Iran showing particularly high citation impact (139 citations).
The United States ranks fourth in terms of output (16 publications), though with relatively low citation impact (52 publications), suggesting either newer entries into the field or less visibility of published work. Bangladesh (14 publications) and Denmark (8 publications) reflect rising participation from countries with growing interest in sustainability and waste-related technological innovation.
Interestingly, Hungary stands out for its high citation-to-publication ratio (90 citations from only three documents), indicating that its contributions, though limited in quantity, are of significant academic influence. Similarly, countries like the United Arab Emirates and the Netherlands, despite low publication counts, demonstrate meaningful participation, as measured by citation and collaboration metrics (TLS of six and four, respectively).
Overall, the geographical spread highlighted in Table 4 confirms the global relevance of AI in sustainable waste management and the importance of fostering international research networks. The variation in total link strength (TLS) also reflects differing levels of collaborative integration across countries, underscoring opportunities to enhance knowledge exchange and cross-border partnerships in this rapidly evolving field.

3.3. Mapping Key Research Streams Through the Most Cited Contributions

The bibliographic analysis subsequently focused on the 20 most-cited articles [15,16,18] addressing the application of AI and Digital Twins (DT) in sustainable waste management. These publications, presented in Table 6, represent foundational scientific contributions in the field. They provide a comprehensive overview of evolving research trends, influential authors and journals, and thematic priorities addressed in recent years [16,18].
The decision to analyze the most-cited rather than the most recent papers was driven by the intention to avoid imposing two consecutive temporal constraints on the bibliometric analysis—the first stemming from the predefined search period in Scopus and the second which would have resulted from selecting only the most recent publications. Thus, the analysis focuses on contributions that have had the greatest scientific impact, capturing well-established theoretical and methodological foundations in the field [15,17,18].
The analysis of the 20 most-cited articles highlights the emergence of a multidimensional and strongly interdisciplinary research landscape. Intelligent technologies are redefining how waste management challenges are addressed, with applications ranging from waste generation forecasting and recycled material design to environmental simulation and industrial optimization within the circular economy framework.
The first key research area involves the use of AI for waste generation prediction and management. Nguyen et al., 2021 [35] developed machine learning models to accurately estimate urban solid waste generation in residential areas, emphasizing the integration of socio-economic data. Similarly, Abbasi and El Hanandeh, 2016 [45] adopted a combination of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) to produce reliable monthly forecasts, demonstrating the applicability of such approaches to support urban decision-making. At the regional level, Kannangara et al., 2018 [46] employed multi-layer neural networks to model waste generation and recovery in Canada, while Vu et al., 2022 [47] showcased how Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), combined with cross-validation techniques, significantly improve waste disposal prediction accuracy.
A second major research area focuses on the use of AI and ML for optimizing recycled materials, particularly in the construction sector. Zhang et al., 2021 [36] and Feng et al., 2022 [39] developed predictive models to determine the mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of recycled concrete, including rubber-modified variations. Similarly, Tran et al., 2022 [40] and Gholampour et al., 2020 [42] applied advanced techniques such as Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), M5 Model Tree (M5Tree), and Least Squares Support Vector Regression (LSSVR) to evaluate compressive strength. At the same time, Peng and Unluer, 2023 [37] and Liu et al., 2021 [38] used hybrid models based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and nature-inspired optimization algorithms to simulate aspects such as carbonation and environmental durability of concrete, proposing data-driven solutions for sustainable building.
Digitalization for circular economy purposes emerged as another transversal research theme. Reuter, 2016 [43] proposed an integrated model to digitalize metallurgical processes and material life cycles, combining technologies such as DT and metallurgical Internet of Things (m-IoT). Likewise, Zhang et al., 2020 [50] illustrated the effectiveness of multi-objective and hybrid intelligence models in guiding the design of high-performance recycled concrete, contributing to more efficient and sustainable resource management.
The environmental management of electronic waste and heavy metal contamination also emerged as a significant area. Chen et al., 2022 [49] and Yang et al., 2021 [52] applied random forest models and geospatial analysis to identify hotspots and risk sources, while Yaseen, 2021 [48], in a comprehensive review, explored the potential of ML models to simulate contamination in soil and water resources, highlighting new perspectives for environmental monitoring. In the geotechnical domain, Jalal et al., 2021 [53] developed AI models such as ANN, ANFIS, and Gene Expression Programming (GEP) to predict the swell strength of expansive soils, supporting sustainable infrastructure design.
The role of deep learning in environmental monitoring has also been explored in the literature. Fan et al., 2023 [44] analyzed the use of AI to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), highlighting applications ranging from waste management to environmental health. Furthermore, Chen et al., 2020 [54] proposed a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based architecture for intelligent detection of water pollution using Near-Infrared (NIR) analysis, offering a promising solution for sustainable agriculture and water quality management.
Finally, growing attention has been paid to the integration of AI, DT, and industrial systems. Fisher et al., 2020 [51] presented a framework that combines data-driven methodologies with the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) to develop predictive models in production processes, with a particular focus on waste valorization and decision support in industrial contexts.
To complement the thematic categorization, a temporal analysis of the most-cited contributions from 2016 to 2023 was conducted to capture the dynamic evolution of research in this field. This dimension addresses the reviewer’s concern by highlighting how scholarly attention has shifted over time in response to technological advances and policy priorities.
The line graph below (Figure 4) illustrates the emergence and evolution of five major research themes: waste forecasting, recycled materials, environmental monitoring, digitalization and circular economy, and AI and industrial systems. The data reveal three distinct phases: an initial focus on forecasting and isolated applications of AI (2016–2018), followed by an expansion into recycled materials and optimization (2019–2021), and finally, a surge in environmental and industrial integration with Digital Twins and deep learning (2021–2023).
This trend indicates a growing systemic perspective, where AI and DT are not only used for prediction or optimization but are increasingly embedded within environmental governance, industrial valorization processes, and sustainability frameworks.
In support of this visualization, Table 7 summarizes the temporal distribution of the most-cited articles, organized by theme. This format emphasizes the continuity and expansion of specific research areas and provides direct references to key contributions over time.
This integrated temporal and thematic analysis contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how research on AI and Digital Twins for sustainable waste management has matured and diversified.

3.4. Summary of Thematic and Conceptual Clusters

Overall, the analyzed literature highlights a growing focus on the application of digital and intelligent solutions to address environmental challenges in waste management. AI is emerging not only as a predictive tool but also as a strategic enabler for the digitalization of material flows, real-time environmental monitoring, optimization of production cycles, and sustainable design. Emerging technological trajectories indicate a shift towards predictive and integrated models capable of reducing environmental impacts, valorizing waste as a resource, and supporting the transition to a circular economy.
This study is characterized by its integrated methodological approach, which combines bibliometric analysis with qualitative thematic review. This synergy enabled a comprehensive understanding of current research trajectories, mapping areas of high scientific intensity and identifying interdisciplinary connections between predictive modeling tools, digital simulation, and sustainability strategies. In particular, the emphasis on the role of AI, DT, and hybrid ML models offers an original contribution aimed at promoting a systemic and data-driven perspective on waste management.
Table 8 summarizes the results of the analysis in a structured format, associating each identified macro-theme with key authors and relevant keywords selected exclusively from those emerging in the bibliometric map (frequency ≥ 3). This organization highlights the main research lines, the most conceptually dense areas, and the semantic relationships among the thematic clusters. The combined approach, integrating conceptual clusters and keyword co-occurrence analysis, has provided a coherent and structured representation of the current scientific landscape, confirming the multidimensional and interdisciplinary nature of digital applications in sustainable waste management.
To complement the thematic clusters and enrich methodological understanding, Table 9 provides a concise overview of the main AI and ML techniques adopted in each research area. For each macro-theme, the table specifies the computational models, the underlying logic (e.g., regression, classification, and simulation), and the corresponding functional purposes (e.g., prediction, optimization, and monitoring). This summary helps clarify how digital methods concretely support scientific and operational advances in sustainable waste management.
This methodological breakdown reinforces the multidimensional nature of the field, showing how specific AI and ML techniques are strategically deployed to address diverse operational and environmental challenges. The integration of regression, simulation, and classification approaches across application domains highlights a growing convergence toward intelligent, adaptive, and predictive waste management systems.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

The analysis conducted in this study highlights how the application of advanced technologies such as AI and Digital Twins (DT) represents a strategic element in the transition toward more sustainable models of waste management [55,56]. The integration of digital solutions across collection, treatment, recycling, and valorization processes enables significant improvements in operational efficiency, traceability of material flows, and reductions in environmental impacts.
Beyond reiterating the key findings, it is crucial to frame them within a broader theoretical and applicative perspective. AI and DT should not be considered merely as technical tools but as enabling infrastructures for socio-technical transformation. Their integration redefines the ontology of waste management by shifting the focus from reactive to anticipatory systems, capable of adapting in real time to environmental and operational conditions.
The bibliometric analysis revealed two major research streams. The first focuses on forecasting and managing urban waste, demonstrating that predictive models based on Machine Learning (ML) enable more accurate estimations of waste generation in residential and regional contexts. This improves urban planning and reduces inefficiencies [35,45,46]. The second stream emphasizes the design of recycled and sustainable materials, showing how AI is used to optimize the mechanical and environmental properties of recycled aggregates, thus promoting more circular practices [36,40,42].
A third area concerns monitoring and environmental impacts, with a particular focus on AI and deep learning applications for real-time environmental analysis, pollutant detection, and risk assessment [41,47,51].
What emerges is not only a diversification of technological applications but a convergence of methods toward integrated, data-driven governance models. For instance, case studies such as the implementation of AI-based waste prediction models in Ho Chi Minh City (Nguyen et al., 2021 [35]) or real-time pollution detection using CNN architectures in agricultural areas of Southeast China (Chen et al., 2020 [54]) provide evidence of operational scalability and replicability.
In parallel, the digitalization of the circular economy emerges as a rapidly expanding domain. The use of DT in production and industrial environments enables continuous simulation of transformation and recovery processes, with the aim of optimizing resource flows in real time, reducing waste, and increasing systemic efficiency [42,49,56]. This approach supports the shift from a linear logic to an intelligent and adaptive management of post-consumer materials.
Another relevant area concerns the environmental management of electronic waste and heavy metals. Here, AI is used to predict contaminant accumulation in soils and water bodies, identifying environmental risk hotspots [48,49,50]. Random forest techniques and advanced spatial analysis have proven particularly effective in locating critical areas, contributing to the prevention and management of environmental damage [56,57].
From a practical standpoint, these insights point to specific policy and operational implications. Municipalities and industries should prioritize the integration of interoperable data infrastructures capable of supporting predictive maintenance, environmental surveillance, and materials tracking. For example, Reuter’s 2016 [43] framework for metallurgical process optimization via DT and m-IoT represents a prototype for sectoral transformation that can be generalized to other industrial chains.
The use of deep learning technologies for environmental monitoring also shows great potential. Fan et al., 2023 [44] and Chen et al., 2020 [54] demonstrate how the application of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and complex neural networks can improve pollutant detection, allowing for faster and more localized responses to environmental issues. These applications fit into an increasingly integrated vision linking environmental data, public health, and sustainability.
Finally, the integration of AI, industrial systems, and DT is confirmed as an emerging trend in production processes aimed at waste valorization. Fisher et al., 2020 [51] show how data-driven approaches, supported by methodological frameworks such as CRISP-DM, foster the adoption of intelligent technologies in industrial contexts, facilitating waste reduction and optimization of by-product management.
Theoretically, this convergence of digital intelligence and environmental planning supports the emergence of a new paradigm—what can be called “anticipatory circularity”—where waste is not only managed but preemptively optimized through real-time simulations and learning algorithms. This concept deserves further theoretical development and empirical validation in future research.
By integrating bibliometric mapping with thematic analysis, the study not only revealed zones of concentrated scientific activity but also uncovered emerging links between predictive methodologies, environmental monitoring, and circular economy models. In particular, the growing role of AI and DT stands out as key to the development of intelligent waste management systems capable of dynamically adapting to changes in material flows, environmental conditions, and territorial needs.

5. Study Limitations

Despite the integrated approach adopted and the richness of the sources analyzed, this study presents several methodological limitations that should be acknowledged.
First, the bibliometric analysis was conducted exclusively using the Scopus database, recognized as one of the most authoritative and comprehensive resources in the scientific landscape. However, this choice may have excluded significant contributions from other relevant databases, such as Web of Science or IEEE Xplore, especially in more interdisciplinary topics.
Second, the selection criteria primarily focused on technical-scientific domains, potentially underrepresenting contributions from social, economic, or political sciences, which could offer complementary perspectives on governance and the real-world implementation of intelligent waste management technologies.
A further limitation concerns the static nature of the analysis, which provides a snapshot of the literature within a specific timeframe but may not fully capture the rapid and continuous evolution of emerging technologies such as AI, IoT, or DT. Some recent developments may not yet be widely represented in the highly cited scientific literature.
Finally, it should be noted that this work adopts a conceptual and descriptive approach and does not include empirical validation of the technologies discussed. There is a lack of experimental data or case studies to assess the concrete impact of AI and DT solutions on actual waste management practices in urban or industrial settings.
To overcome these limitations and build upon the findings of this study, future research could follow several specific directions:
Conduct empirical case studies focused on the implementation of AI and DT systems in real waste management settings—particularly in smart cities or industrial symbiosis contexts—evaluating cost-effectiveness, scalability, and environmental performance.
Explore the integration of AI with regulatory frameworks and public policy tools to assess how predictive models and Digital Twins can support governance and decision-making in circular economy strategies.
Develop comparative analyses of algorithmic performance (e.g., ANN, CNN, RNN, and ANFIS) across different types of waste (municipal, industrial, hazardous) to identify the most effective configurations for specific applications.
Investigate the ethical, social, and organizational implications of AI and DT adoption in the waste sector, with attention to data governance, user acceptance, and workforce adaptation.
Expand bibliometric mapping to include emerging fields such as edge computing, blockchain, and generative AI in waste systems, which were outside the scope of this review but are gaining rapid momentum.
These research paths would not only address the current methodological gaps but also contribute to advancing the theoretical and operational maturity of intelligent waste management systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C., P.C., A.M.T. and R.R.; methodology, R.C.; software, R.C.; validation, R.C., P.C., A.M.T. and R.R.; formal analysis, R.C.; investigation, P.C. and A.M.T.; data curation, R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C.; writing—review and editing, P.C. and R.R.; visualization, R.C., P.C., A.M.T. and R.R.; supervision, P.C., A.M.T. and R.R.; project administration, P.C., A.M.T. and R.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial Intelligence
DTDigital Twin
MLMachine Learning
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
TLSTotal Link Strength
JTJournal title
TNPTotal No. of Publications
TNCTotal No. of Citations
ANFISAdaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System
k-NNk-Nearest Neighbors
RNNRecurrent Neural Network
LSTMLong Short-Term Memory
CNNConvolutional Neural Network
CRISP-DMCross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining

References

  1. Hoornweg, D.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Kennedy, C. Waste production must peak this century. Nature 2013, 502, 615–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wilson, D.C.; Velis, C.; Cheeseman, C. Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat Int. 2012, 30, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ihsanullah, I.; Alam, G.; Jamal, A.; Shaik, F. Recent advances in applications of artificial intelligence in solid waste management: A review. Chemosphere 2022, 309, 136631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Naji, K.K.; Gunduz, M.; Alhenzab, F.; Al-Hababi, H.; Al-Qahtani, A. Assessing the digital transformation readiness of the construction industry utilizing the Delphi Method. Buildings 2024, 14, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tao, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 15, 2405–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Çetin, S.; Gruis, V.; Straub, A. Digitalization for a circular economy in the building industry. Energy Build. 2022, 256, 111691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shah, K.B.; Visalakshi, S.; Guragain, D.P.; Panigrahi, R. Advancing smart city sustainability with Internet of Things and artificial intelligence aided low-cost digital twin systems for waste management. Microsyst. Technol. 2024, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. The emerging data–driven smart city and its innovative applied solutions for sustainability: The cases of London and Barcelona. Energy Inform. 2020, 3, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rocca, R.; Rosa, P.; Sassanelli, C.; Fumagalli, L.; Terzi, S. Integrating virtual reality and digital twin in circular economy practices: A laboratory application case. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hosseini, M.; Gao, P.; Vivas-Valencia, C. A social-environmental impact perspective of generative artificial intelligence. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnology 2025, 23, 100520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Feng, Y.; Wang, H.; Xia, G.; Cao, W.; Li, T.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. A machine learning-based data-driven method for risk analysis of marine accidents. J. Mar. Eng. Technol. 2025, 24, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kraus, S.; Breier, M.; Lim, W.M.; Dabić, M.; Kumar, S.; Kanbach, D.; Mukherjee, D.; Corvello, V.; Piñeiro-Chousa, J.; Liguori, E.; et al. Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2022, 16, 2577–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, K.; Liang, Q.M. Recent progress of cooperation on climate mitigation: A bibliometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 123495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hassan, M.A.U.; Mushtaq, S.; Li, T.; Yang, Z. A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most cited articles about quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. Egypt. Heart J. 2025, 77, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rogers, G.; Szomszor, M.; Adams, J. Sample size in bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2020, 125, 777–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fei, X.; Zeng, Q.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y.; Xu, F. Bibliometric analysis of 100 most-cited articles in delirium. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 931632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Campana, P.; Censi, R.; Ruggieri, R.; Amendola, C. Smart Grids and Sustainability: The Impact of Digital Technologies on the Energy Transition. Energies 2025, 18, 2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Greener, S. Evaluating literature with bibliometrics. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2022, 30, 1168–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pranckutė; R Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications 2021, 9, 12. [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, R.; Saxena, S.; Kumar, V.; Prabha, V.; Kumar, R.; Kukreti, A. Service innovation research: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Compet. Rev. Int. Bus. J. 2024, 34, 736–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weber, E.J.; Katz, P.P.; Waeckerle, J.F.; Callaham, M.L. Author perception of peer review: Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction. JAMA 2002, 287, 2790–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arya, S.; Kaji, A.H.; Boermeester, M.A. PRISMA reporting guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews. JAMA Surg. 2021, 156, 789–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Al Husaeni, D.F.; Nandiyanto, A.B.D. Bibliometric using Vosviewer with Publish or Perish (using google scholar data): From step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post COVID-19 pandemic. ASEAN J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2, 19–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Orduña-Malea, E.; Costas, R. Link-based approach to study scientific software usage: The case of VOSviewer. Scientometrics 2021, 126, 8153–8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Salgado-Cruz, M.d.l.P.; Salgado-Cruz, J.; García-Hernández, A.B.; Calderón- Domínguez, G.; Gómez-Viquez, H.; Oliver-Espinoza, R.; Fernández-Martínez, M.C.; Yáñez-Fernández, J. Chitosan as a coating for biocontrol in postharvest products: A bibliometric review. Membranes 2021, 11, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.; Xu, Z.; Škare, M. A bibliometric analysis of economic research-ekonomska istrazivanja (2007–2019). Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2020, 33, 865–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nandiyanto, A.B.D.; Biddinika, M.K.; Triawan, F. How bibliographic dataset portrays decreasing number of scientific publications from Indonesia. Indones. J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 5, 154–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eck, N.; Waltman, L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics 2017, 111, 1053–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L.; Dekker, R.; Van Den Berg, J. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2010, 61, 2405–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khalil, G.M.; Crawford, C.A.G. A bibliometric analysis of US-based research on the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2015, 48, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bellini, F.; Campana, P.; Censi, R.; Di Renzo, M.; Tarola, A.M. Energy communities in the transition to renewable sources: Innovative models of energy self-sufficiency through organic waste. Energies 2024, 17, 3789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Corbin, J.M.; Strauss, A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 1990, 13, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nguyen, X.C.; Nguyen, T.T.H.; La, D.D.; Kumar, G.; Rene, E.R.; Nguyen, D.D.; Chang, S.W.; Chung, W.J.; Nguyen, X.H.; Nguyen, V.K. Development of machine learning-based models to forecast solid waste generation in residential areas: A case study from Vietnam. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Ma, G.; Nener, B. Mixture optimization for environmental, economical and mechanical objectives in silica fume concrete: A novel frame-work based on machine learning and a new meta-heuristic algorithm. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peng, Y.; Unluer, C. Modeling the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete using hybrid machine learning algorithms. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, K.; Alam, M.S.; Zhu, J.; Zheng, J.; Chi, L. Prediction of carbonation depth for recycled aggregate concrete using ANN hybridized with swarm intelligence algorithms. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 301, 124382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Feng, W.; Wang, Y.; Sun, J.; Tang, Y.; Wu, D.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Prediction of thermo-mechanical properties of rubber-modified recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 318, 125970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tran, V.Q.; Dang, V.Q.; Ho, L.S. Evaluating compressive strength of concrete made with recycled concrete aggregates using machine learning approach. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 323, 126578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qi, C.; Fourie, A.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, Q. A strength prediction model using artificial intelligence for recycling waste tailings as cemented paste backfill. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 183, 566–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gholampour, A.; Mansouri, I.; Kisi, O.; Ozbakkaloglu, T. Evaluation of mechanical properties of concretes containing coarse recycled concrete aggregates using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), M5 model tree (M5Tree), and least squares support vector regression (LSSVR) models. Neural Comput. Appl. 2020, 32, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reuter, M.A. Digitalizing the circular economy: Circular economy engineering defined by the metallurgical internet of things. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2016, 47, 3194–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, Z.; Yan, Z.; Wen, S. Deep learning and artificial intelligence in sustainability: A review of SDGs, renewable energy, and environmental health. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abbasi, M.; El Hanandeh, A. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modelling approaches. Waste Manag. 2016, 56, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kannangara, M.; Dua, R.; Ahmadi, L.; Bensebaa, F. Modeling and prediction of regional municipal solid waste generation and diversion in Canada using machine learning approaches. Waste Manag. 2018, 74, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vu, H.L.; Ng, K.T.W.; Richter, A.; An, C. Analysis of input set characteristics and variances on k-fold cross validation for a Recurrent Neural Network model on waste disposal rate estimation. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 311, 114869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yaseen, Z.M. An insight into machine learning models era in simulating soil, water bodies and adsorption heavy metals: Review, challenges and solutions. Chemosphere 2021, 277, 130126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, H.; Wang, L.; Hu, B.; Xu, J.; Liu, X. Potential driving forces and probabilistic health risks of heavy metal accumulation in the soils from an e-waste area, southeast China. Chemosphere 2022, 289, 133182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Aslani, F.; Ma, G.; Nener, B. A hybrid intelligent system for designing optimal proportions of recycled aggregate concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fisher, O.J.; Watson, N.J.; Escrig, J.E.; Witt, R.; Porcu, L.; Bacon, D.; Rigley, M.; Gomes, R.L. Considerations, challenges and opportunities when developing data-driven models for process manufacturing systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2020, 140, 106881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, S.; Taylor, D.; Yang, D.; He, M.; Liu, X.; Xu, J. A synthesis framework using machine learning and spatial bivariate analysis to identify drivers and hotspots of heavy metal pollution of agricultural soils. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 287, 117611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jalal, F.E.; Xu, Y.; Iqbal, M.; Javed, M.F.; Jamhiri, B. Predictive modeling of swell-strength of expansive soils using artificial intelligence approaches: ANN, ANFIS and GEP. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 289, 112420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, H.; Chen, A.; Xu, L.; Xie, H.; Qiao, H.; Lin, Q.; Cai, K. A deep learning CNN architecture applied in smart near-infrared analysis of water pollution for agricultural irrigation resources. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 240, 106303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, H.; Lang, B. Machine learning and deep learning methods for intrusion detection systems: A survey. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tamrakar, U.; Shrestha, D.; Maharjan, M.; Bhattarai, B.P.; Hansen, T.M.; Tonkoski, R. Virtual inertia: Current trends and future directions. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Brezočnik, L.; Fister, I., Jr.; Podgorelec, V. Swarm intelligence algorithms for feature selection: A review. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Search query used in the Scopus database to identify relevant literature. Our elaboration.
Figure 1. Search query used in the Scopus database to identify relevant literature. Our elaboration.
Applsci 15 06337 g001
Figure 2. PRISMA diagram—document selection process. Our elaboration.
Figure 2. PRISMA diagram—document selection process. Our elaboration.
Applsci 15 06337 g002
Figure 3. Keyword co-occurrence map derived from bibliometric analysis of journal articles and conference proceedings. Our elaboration.
Figure 3. Keyword co-occurrence map derived from bibliometric analysis of journal articles and conference proceedings. Our elaboration.
Applsci 15 06337 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of research themes (2016–2023). Our elaboration.
Figure 4. Evolution of research themes (2016–2023). Our elaboration.
Applsci 15 06337 g004
Table 1. Association between constructs and thematic descriptors. Our elaboration.
Table 1. Association between constructs and thematic descriptors. Our elaboration.
ConstructDescriptionReferences
Global challengeWaste management as a global issue requiring innovative solutions[1]
Emerging technologiesAI, machine learning, advanced simulation, and modeling for waste optimization[3]
Digital TwinVirtual replicas for simulation, decision support, and system optimization[5]
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for document selection. Our elaboration.
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for document selection. Our elaboration.
PhaseInclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
IdentificationPublications indexed in Scopus database; English language; years 2015–2025Publications outside time window (pre-2015 or post-2025) (n = 0)
ScreeningPeer-reviewed documents: journal articles, reviews, and conference papersNon-peer-reviewed works: notes, editorials, book chapters, etc. (n = 199)
EligibilityBelonging to subject areas: Computer Science (COMP), Engineering (ENGI), Environmental Science (ENVI)Records from unrelated domains (e.g., social sciences, business) (n = 104)
InclusionStudies matching all previous filters and containing relevant thematic keywords(Final records included: 570)
Table 3. Rank of co-occurrence of keywords. Our elaboration.
Table 3. Rank of co-occurrence of keywords. Our elaboration.
RankKeywordTLS
1prediction128
2artificial intelligence119
3artificial neural network106
4environmental management106
5neural-networks106
6machine learning103
7recycling94
8waste management90
9adaptation strategies69
10adaptation strategy68
Note: TLS = Total Link Strength.
Table 4. Top 10 most productive journals ranked by total no. of publications. Our elaboration.
Table 4. Top 10 most productive journals ranked by total no. of publications. Our elaboration.
RankJTTNP
1Waste Management25
2Journal of Cleaner Production25
3Construction And Building Materials18
4Science Of The Total Environment17
5Lecture Notes In Networks And Systems15
6Sustainability Switzerland14
7Journal Of Environmental Management13
8Waste Management And Research11
9Resources Conservation And Recycling11
10Iop Conference Series Earth And Environmental Science11
Note: JT = Journal title; TNP = Total No. of publications.
Table 5. Countries rank with number of documents. Our elaboration.
Table 5. Countries rank with number of documents. Our elaboration.
CountryTNPTNCTLS
Australia3914923
Iran2213918
Saudi Arabia2516714
United States165214
Bangladesh146412
China91710
Denmark8658
Hungary3907
United Arab Emirates2216
Netherlands1324
Note: TNP = Total No. of Publications; TNC = Total No. of Citations; TLS = Total Link Strength.
Table 6. State-of-the-art analysis. Our elaboration.
Table 6. State-of-the-art analysis. Our elaboration.
TitleReferencesNo. of CitationsMain FocusResearch Trends
Development of machine learning-based models to forecast solid waste generation in residential areas: A case study from Vietnam[35]296Forecasting urban solid waste generation using MLImproving predictive accuracy and integrating socio-economic data
Mixture optimization for environmental, economical, and mechanical objectives in silica fume concrete[36]283Optimization of concrete mixtures with silica fume using MLMulti-objective applications for sustainability and mechanical performance
Modeling the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete using hybrid machine learning algorithms[37]269Mechanical properties of recycled concrete through hybrid ML modelsUse of SHAP/PDP for explainability in predictive models
Prediction of carbonation depth for recycled aggregate concrete using ANN hybridized with swarm intelligence algorithms[38]257Carbonation depth in recycled concrete using hybrid ANN modelsRobust ML models for durability and environmental degradation
Prediction of thermo-mechanical properties of rubber-modified recycled aggregate concrete[39]247Thermo-mechanical properties of rubber-modified recycled concretePredicting performance at high temperatures using ML
Evaluating compressive strength of concrete made with recycled concrete aggregates using machine-learning approach[40]228Estimating compressive strength of recycled concreteHybrid ML models for assessing concrete quality
A strength prediction model using artificial intelligence for recycling waste tailings as cemented paste backfill[41]199Strength prediction of mine waste-based backfillApplying BRT + PSO to reduce experimental testing
Evaluation of mechanical properties of concretes containing coarse recycled concrete aggregates using MARS, M5Tree, and LSSVR[42]183Mechanical properties evaluation with multiple ML modelsComparing AI models for accurate property prediction
Digitalizing the circular economy: Circular economy engineering defined by the metallurgical Internet of Things[43]156Digitalization of the circular economy in metallurgical processesm-IoT, Digital Twins, and systemic optimization for circular economy
Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Sustainability: A Review of SDGs, Renewable Energy, and Environmental Health[44]142Review on AI and DL use for SDGs, renewable energy, and environmental healthAI for energy optimization, waste management, and environmental health
Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modeling approaches[45]133Predicting urban waste generation using MLANFIS and kNN optimization for accurate monthly forecasts
Modeling and prediction of regional municipal solid waste generation and diversion in Canada using machine learning approaches[46]125Regional waste generation prediction in CanadaNeural networks for national waste inventories
Analysis of input set characteristics and variances on k-fold cross-validation for a Recurrent Neural Network model on waste disposal rate estimation[47]112Cross-validation effects on RNN models for waste disposalRNN-LSTM to improve waste disposal prediction accuracy
An insight into machine learning models era in simulating soil, water bodies, and adsorption heavy metals[48]109Review of ML models for heavy metal contamination in soil and waterDeveloping ML for environmental simulation and contamination management
Potential driving forces and probabilistic health risks of heavy metal accumulation in the soils from an e-waste area[49]108Drivers and health risks from heavy metals in e-waste soilsRandom forest for prediction and heavy metal mapping
A hybrid intelligent system for designing optimal proportions of recycled aggregate concrete[50]96Optimizing recycled concrete mix designs using AIHybrid models and MOO for enhanced sustainability and strength
Considerations, challenges, and opportunities when developing data-driven models for process manufacturing systems[51]92Data-driven modeling for manufacturing processesIntegrating CRISP-DM and AI for waste valorization
A synthesis framework using machine learning and spatial bivariate analysis to identify drivers and hotspots of heavy metal pollution[52]85Spatial analysis and ML for sources and hotspots of heavy metalsGeospatial approach and RF for agricultural soil management
Predictive modeling of swell-strength of expansive soils using artificial intelligence approaches: ANN, ANFIS, and GEP[53]85AI models for geotechnical properties of expansive soilsGEP and ANN for reliable environmental engineering predictions
A deep learning CNN architecture applied in smart near-infrared analysis of water pollution[54]84CNN for NIR analysis of water pollution in agricultureIntelligent models for rapid water monitoring
Table 7. Chronological distribution of top-cited articles by thematic area. Our elaboration.
Table 7. Chronological distribution of top-cited articles by thematic area. Our elaboration.
ThemeTimelineReferences
Digitalization and Circular Economy2016[43]
Waste Forecasting2016–2019[45,46,47,50]
AI and Industrial Systems2020–2021[51]
Recycled Materials2020–2023[39,41,43,50,55]
Environmental Monitoring2021–2022[48,49,52,53]
Table 8. Summary of constructs. Our elaboration.
Table 8. Summary of constructs. Our elaboration.
Macro ThemeReferencesAssociated Keywords
AI for forecasting and managing waste generation[35,45,46,47]waste management, urban waste, prediction, machine learning
AI and ML for recycled materials and sustainable concrete[36,37,38,39,40,42]recycling, artificial intelligence, optimization
Digitalization and circular economy[43,50]digital twin, circular economy
E-waste, heavy metals, and environmental management[48,49,52,53]air pollution, human, environmental monitoring
Deep learning and environmental monitoring[44,54]deep learning, sustainable development goal, zero carbon
Integration of AI, industrial systems, and DT[51]digital twin, artificial intelligence
Table 9. Summary of AI/ML methods by research area. Our elaboration.
Table 9. Summary of AI/ML methods by research area. Our elaboration.
Research AreaAI/ML Methods and PurposeReferences
AI for forecasting and managing waste generationANN, ANFIS, k-NN, RNN-LSTM—regression techniques to estimate urban and regional waste generation with high temporal accuracy.[35,45,46,47]
AI and ML for recycled materialsMARS, LSSVR, M5Tree, ANN + PSO/GA—regression and optimization models for compressive strength, carbonation, and durability prediction.[37,38,39,40,41,43,50,55]
Environmental monitoringRandom Forest, CNN, geospatial ML—classification and spatial simulation to identify pollution hotspots, heavy metals, and water contamination.[48,49,52,53]
Digitalization and circular economyDigital Twin (DT), m-IoT, hybrid AI systems—simulation and system modeling for process optimization and lifecycle management.[43,50]
Deep learning and environmental healthCNN, deep neural networks—anomaly detection and monitoring for SDG-aligned pollution control.[44,49]
AI and Industrial integrationCRISP-DM, clustering, predictive analytics—data-driven decision support and waste valorization in industrial contexts.[51]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campana, P.; Censi, R.; Tarola, A.M.; Ruggieri, R. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Sustainable Waste Management: A Bibliometric and Thematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116337

AMA Style

Campana P, Censi R, Tarola AM, Ruggieri R. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Sustainable Waste Management: A Bibliometric and Thematic Review. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(11):6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campana, Paola, Riccardo Censi, Anna Maria Tarola, and Roberto Ruggieri. 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Sustainable Waste Management: A Bibliometric and Thematic Review" Applied Sciences 15, no. 11: 6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116337

APA Style

Campana, P., Censi, R., Tarola, A. M., & Ruggieri, R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Sustainable Waste Management: A Bibliometric and Thematic Review. Applied Sciences, 15(11), 6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116337

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop