Next Article in Journal
An ECC-Based Anonymous and Fast Handover Authentication Protocol for Internet of Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of High-Intensity Therapy in Rehabilitation of Parkinson’s Disease Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Experimental Stabilization of Clay Soils in Cartagena de Indias Colombia: Influence of Porosity/Binder Index

by
Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino
1,*,
Ramon Torres Ortega
1 and
Yamid E. Nuñez de la Rosa
2,*
1
Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias 130015, Colombia
2
Faculty of Engineering and Basic Sciences, Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Bogota 110231, Colombia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 5895; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115895
Submission received: 28 April 2025 / Revised: 19 May 2025 / Accepted: 22 May 2025 / Published: 23 May 2025

Abstract

In response to the need for sustainable soil stabilization alternatives, this study explores the use of waste materials and biopolymers to improve the mechanical behavior of clay from Cartagena, Colombia. Crushed limestone waste (CLW), ground glass powder (GG), recycled gypsum (GY), xanthan gum (XG), and the combination of XG with polypropylene fibers (XG–PPF) were used as stabilizing agents. Samples were compacted at different dry densities and cured for 28 days. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) tests were conducted to assess the strength and stiffness of the treated mixtures. Results were normalized using the porosity/binder index (), leading to predictive equations with high determination coefficients (R2 = 0.94 for UCS and R2 = 0.96 for stiffness). However, XG-treated mixtures exhibited distinct behavior that prevented their inclusion in a unified predictive model, as the fitted exponent x in the porosity/binder index () differed markedly from the others. While an exponent of 0.28 was suitable for blends with mineral binders, the optimal x values for XG and XG–PPF mixtures were significantly lower at 0.02 and 0.03, respectively, reflecting their unique gel-like and fiber-reinforced characteristics. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) identified cement content and compaction density as the most influential factors, while some interactions involving the residues were not statistically significant, despite aligning with experimental trends. The findings support the technical viability of using sustainable additives to enhance soil properties with reduced environmental impact.
Keywords: construction waste; xanthan gum; porosity/binder index; strength; stiffness construction waste; xanthan gum; porosity/binder index; strength; stiffness

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baldovino, J.d.J.A.; Ortega, R.T.; Nuñez de la Rosa, Y.E. Experimental Stabilization of Clay Soils in Cartagena de Indias Colombia: Influence of Porosity/Binder Index. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115895

AMA Style

Baldovino JdJA, Ortega RT, Nuñez de la Rosa YE. Experimental Stabilization of Clay Soils in Cartagena de Indias Colombia: Influence of Porosity/Binder Index. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(11):5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baldovino, Jair de Jesús Arrieta, Ramon Torres Ortega, and Yamid E. Nuñez de la Rosa. 2025. "Experimental Stabilization of Clay Soils in Cartagena de Indias Colombia: Influence of Porosity/Binder Index" Applied Sciences 15, no. 11: 5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115895

APA Style

Baldovino, J. d. J. A., Ortega, R. T., & Nuñez de la Rosa, Y. E. (2025). Experimental Stabilization of Clay Soils in Cartagena de Indias Colombia: Influence of Porosity/Binder Index. Applied Sciences, 15(11), 5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop