Motion Trajectory Prediction in Warehouse Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This paper presents a systematic literature review on the application of motion trajectory prediction in warehouse management systems and provides corresponding conclusions and discussions.
1、 In the introduction, the description of the background of warehouse management systems and motion trajectory prediction is not sufficiently clear.
2、 The introduction should delve deeper into explaining the importance and practical application of "motion trajectory prediction" in warehouse management systems. Providing more real-world examples or data to support the research motivation would enhance the persuasiveness of the background.
3、 The number of references in the paper is relatively limited. It is suggested that the authors reevaluate the references used in the literature review to ensure they cover important research in the field, especially relevant methods and applications of motion trajectory prediction in warehouse management systems.
4、 In the paper, not only should existing literature be listed, but it should also be summarized and compared. Existing research can be summarized and categorized based on different methods, and their advantages and limitations should be pointed out. Emphasize the applicability and limitations of each method in warehouse management systems and compare them with other methods to highlight the paper's unique contributions.
5、 Besides merely listing the results of existing research, a more in-depth analysis and evaluation should be conducted. Identify the innovations, shortcomings, and possible improvement directions of each literature. From a practical application perspective, discuss the feasibility and effectiveness of these methods in real warehouse management scenarios.
6、 In the conclusion, the authors can summarize the main findings of the paper and emphasize their unique insights and contributions.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Please find our responses in the attached file.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The background introduction for motion trajectory prediction in warehouse management Systems is not sufficient, especially for readers who are not familiar with this field.
The manuscript contains some long sentences, which can make it challenging to follow. Breaking them down into shorter sentences can improve readability.
It’s recommended to add some table or sketch map to summarize some vital information.
Too many algorithms were introduced in detail in this manuscript, but lack of own analysis, comparison, and summary. And the use of certain terms in these algorithms might be unclear to some readers, especially those who are not familiar with the subject matter.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Please find our responses in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
I appreciate the author for doing the review in a systematic way and following the PRISMA standard upto a level. However, the PRISMA flow diagram is missing in the manuscript.
The main drawback in this study is the number of sources used is very less. Exactly a 58 number of sources only used and it is very less. Hence, the author needs to improve the number of sources.
In section 4, the author needs to compare the outcomes from each sources, in a tabular format, in each subsection. Along with the tabular data, the author can use graphical comparison also for improving the readability.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Please find our responses in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
this manuscript meets the quality for publication
Reviewer 3 Report
I appreciate the author for an immaculate response.
