Next Article in Journal
Preliminary Study for Smoke Color Classification of Combustibles Using the Distribution of Light Scattering by Smoke Particles
Next Article in Special Issue
Prediction of the Absorption Characteristics of Non-Uniform Acoustic Absorbers with Grazing Flow
Previous Article in Journal
Reliability of the Polygraphic Home Sleep Test for OSA Determined by the Severity and Pattern Changes of Two Consecutive Examinations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seismic Data Denoising Based on Wavelet Transform and the Residual Neural Network
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Two-Stage Rolling Bearing Weak Fault Feature Extraction Method Combining Adaptive Morphological Filter with Frequency Band Selection Strategy

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(1), 668; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010668
by Jun Li 1, Hongchao Wang 2,*, Simin Li 3, Liang Chen 3 and Qiqian Dang 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(1), 668; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010668
Submission received: 23 November 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Active Vibration and Noise Control)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Summary: This paper combines morphological filtering (MF) with frequency band selection (FBS) to detect fault features  of rolling bearings. The approach is applied to synthetic data and an engineering vibration signal, showing that it can extract the periodic transient features of faulty bearing effectively.

The paper heavily relies on acronyms and this makes difficult to follow it. This is aggravated by the structure of the paper: the different elements of the analysis are first presented separately in Secs. 2-3, and the whole approach is not introduced until Sec. 4. The paper could be improved by explaining first the methodology/objectives and then presenting the different components. 

In general, the clarity of the exposition could be improved by limiting acronyms and unnecessary definitions (see Sec. 2 for instance).

Suggestions:

1.- Some letters denoting sub-figures are missing in Figs. 2, 6 and 8.

2.- What is exactly depicted in Figs. 6(e) and 8(e)? Where is level defined?

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

      I have revised the paper thoroughly under your comments. Thanks a lot for your valuable advice.

hongchao wang

12.9.2022

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper reports an interesting and useful mathematical analysis along with experimental work, well structured in the manuscript. The manuscript has some weaknesses. Mentioned below aspects should be taken into consideration during the revision:

I suggest adding "Nomenclature" section in the manuscript as a large number of abbreviations have been used in the manuscript.

I suggest add a brief explanation of the experiment.

 

In Fig. 2, 6 & 8 please check the caption of the sub-images in the figure

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

    I have revised the paper thoroughly under your comments. Thanks a lot for your valuable advice.

hongchao wang

12.9.2022

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop