Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Al/CNT Nanocomposites Produced by Powder Metallurgy
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Recent Advances and Challenges in Grocery Label Detection and Recognition
Previous Article in Journal
Production and Characterization of a β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex with Platonia insignis Seed Extract as a Proposal for a Gastroprotective System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Human Activity Recognition for Assisted Living Based on Scene Understanding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Blind Image Quality Assessment with Deep Learning: A Replicability Study and Its Reproducibility in Lifelogging

IEETA/DETI, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(1), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010059
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computer Vision-Based Intelligent Systems: Challenges and Approaches)

Abstract

The wide availability and small size of different types of sensors have allowed for the acquisition of a huge amount of data about a person’s life in real time. With these data, usually denoted as lifelog data, we can analyze and understand personal experiences and behaviors. Most of the lifelog research has explored the use of visual data. However, a considerable amount of these images or videos are affected by different types of degradation or noise due to the non-controlled acquisition process. Image Quality Assessment can plays an essential role in lifelog research to deal with these data. We present in this paper a twofold study on the topic of blind image quality assessment. On the one hand, we explore the replication of the training process of a state-of-the-art deep learning model for blind image quality assessment in the wild. On the other hand, we present evidence that blind image quality assessment is an important pre-processing step to be further explored in the context of information retrieval in lifelogging applications. We consider that our efforts have been successful in the replication of the model training process, achieving similar results of inference when compared to the original version, while acknowledging a fair number of assumptions that we had to consider. Moreover, these assumptions motivated an extensive additional analysis that led to significant insights on the influence of both batch size and loss functions when training deep learning models in this context. We include preliminary results of the replicated model on a lifelogging dataset, as a potential reproducibility aspect to be considered.
Keywords: image processing; blind image quality assessment; deep learning; replicability; reproducibility; image retrieval; lifelogging image processing; blind image quality assessment; deep learning; replicability; reproducibility; image retrieval; lifelogging

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro, R.; Trifan, A.; Neves, A.J.R. Blind Image Quality Assessment with Deep Learning: A Replicability Study and Its Reproducibility in Lifelogging. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010059

AMA Style

Ribeiro R, Trifan A, Neves AJR. Blind Image Quality Assessment with Deep Learning: A Replicability Study and Its Reproducibility in Lifelogging. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(1):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro, Ricardo, Alina Trifan, and António J. R. Neves. 2023. "Blind Image Quality Assessment with Deep Learning: A Replicability Study and Its Reproducibility in Lifelogging" Applied Sciences 13, no. 1: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010059

APA Style

Ribeiro, R., Trifan, A., & Neves, A. J. R. (2023). Blind Image Quality Assessment with Deep Learning: A Replicability Study and Its Reproducibility in Lifelogging. Applied Sciences, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010059

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop